Misplaced Pages

Fixed-point property: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:15, 5 April 2023 editGeneral Kipicus (talk | contribs)197 edits #suggestededit-add 1.0Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:51, 25 September 2024 edit undo129.104.65.7 (talk) TopologyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Mathematical property}} {{Short description|Mathematical property}}
A ] object ''X'' has '''the fixed-point property''' if every suitably well-behaved ] from ''X'' to itself has a ]. The term is most commonly used to describe ]s on which every ] mapping has a fixed point. But another use is in ], where a ] ''P'' is said to have the fixed point property if every ] on ''P'' has a fixed point. A ] object ''X'' has the '''fixed-point property''' if every suitably well-behaved ] from ''X'' to itself has a ]. The term is most commonly used to describe ]s on which every ] mapping has a fixed point. But another use is in ], where a ] ''P'' is said to have the fixed point property if every ] on ''P'' has a fixed point.


==Definition== ==Definition==
Line 29: Line 29:
The FPP is a ], i.e. is preserved by any ]. The FPP is also preserved by any ]. The FPP is a ], i.e. is preserved by any ]. The FPP is also preserved by any ].


According to ] every ] and ] ] of a ] has the FPP. More generally, according to the ] every ] and ] subset of a ] has the FPP. Compactness alone does not imply the FPP and convexity is not even a topological property so it makes sense to ask how to topologically characterize the FPP. In 1932 ] asked whether compactness together with ] could be a sufficient condition for the FPP to hold. The problem was open for 20 years until the conjecture was disproved by Kinoshita who found an example of a compact contractible space without the FPP.<ref>Kinoshita, S. On Some Contractible Continua without Fixed Point Property. ''Fund. Math.'' '''40''' (1953), 96–98</ref> According to the ], every ] and ] ] of a ] has the FPP. More generally, according to the ] every ] and ] subset of a ] has the FPP. Compactness alone does not imply the FPP and convexity is not even a topological property so it makes sense to ask how to topologically characterize the FPP. In 1932 ] asked whether compactness together with ] could be a sufficient condition for the FPP to hold. The problem was open for 20 years until the conjecture was disproved by Kinoshita who found an example of a compact contractible space without the FPP.<ref>Kinoshita, S. On Some Contractible Continua without Fixed Point Property. ''Fund. Math.'' '''40''' (1953), 96–98</ref>


==References== ==References==

Latest revision as of 13:51, 25 September 2024

Mathematical property

A mathematical object X has the fixed-point property if every suitably well-behaved mapping from X to itself has a fixed point. The term is most commonly used to describe topological spaces on which every continuous mapping has a fixed point. But another use is in order theory, where a partially ordered set P is said to have the fixed point property if every increasing function on P has a fixed point.

Definition

Let A be an object in the concrete category C. Then A has the fixed-point property if every morphism (i.e., every function) f : A A {\displaystyle f:A\to A} has a fixed point.

The most common usage is when C = Top is the category of topological spaces. Then a topological space X has the fixed-point property if every continuous map f : X X {\displaystyle f:X\to X} has a fixed point.

Examples

Singletons

In the category of sets, the objects with the fixed-point property are precisely the singletons.

The closed interval

The closed interval has the fixed point property: Let f: → be a continuous mapping. If f(0) = 0 or f(1) = 1, then our mapping has a fixed point at 0 or 1. If not, then f(0) > 0 and f(1) − 1 < 0. Thus the function g(x) = f(x) − x is a continuous real valued function which is positive at x = 0 and negative at x = 1. By the intermediate value theorem, there is some point x0 with g(x0) = 0, which is to say that f(x0) − x0 = 0, and so x0 is a fixed point.

The open interval does not have the fixed-point property. The mapping f(x) = x has no fixed point on the interval (0,1).

The closed disc

The closed interval is a special case of the closed disc, which in any finite dimension has the fixed-point property by the Brouwer fixed-point theorem.

Topology

A retract A of a space X with the fixed-point property also has the fixed-point property. This is because if r : X A {\displaystyle r:X\to A} is a retraction and f : A A {\displaystyle f:A\to A} is any continuous function, then the composition i f r : X X {\displaystyle i\circ f\circ r:X\to X} (where i : A X {\displaystyle i:A\to X} is inclusion) has a fixed point. That is, there is x A {\displaystyle x\in A} such that f r ( x ) = x {\displaystyle f\circ r(x)=x} . Since x A {\displaystyle x\in A} we have that r ( x ) = x {\displaystyle r(x)=x} and therefore f ( x ) = x . {\displaystyle f(x)=x.}

A topological space has the fixed-point property if and only if its identity map is universal.

A product of spaces with the fixed-point property in general fails to have the fixed-point property even if one of the spaces is the closed real interval.

The FPP is a topological invariant, i.e. is preserved by any homeomorphism. The FPP is also preserved by any retraction.

According to the Brouwer fixed-point theorem, every compact and convex subset of a Euclidean space has the FPP. More generally, according to the Schauder-Tychonoff fixed point theorem every compact and convex subset of a locally convex topological vector space has the FPP. Compactness alone does not imply the FPP and convexity is not even a topological property so it makes sense to ask how to topologically characterize the FPP. In 1932 Borsuk asked whether compactness together with contractibility could be a sufficient condition for the FPP to hold. The problem was open for 20 years until the conjecture was disproved by Kinoshita who found an example of a compact contractible space without the FPP.

References

  1. Kinoshita, S. On Some Contractible Continua without Fixed Point Property. Fund. Math. 40 (1953), 96–98
Category: