Revision as of 00:09, 6 November 2020 editGsquaredxc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,608 editsm v2.03b - WP:WCW project (Link equal to linktext)Tag: WPCleaner← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:51, 25 September 2024 edit undo129.104.65.7 (talk) →TopologyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Mathematical property}} | |||
A ] object ''X'' has ''' |
A ] object ''X'' has the '''fixed-point property''' if every suitably well-behaved ] from ''X'' to itself has a ]. The term is most commonly used to describe ]s on which every ] mapping has a fixed point. But another use is in ], where a ] ''P'' is said to have the fixed point property if every ] on ''P'' has a fixed point. | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
A topological space has the fixed-point property if and only if its identity map is ]. | A topological space has the fixed-point property if and only if its identity map is ]. | ||
A ] of spaces with the fixed-point property in general fails to have the fixed-point property even if one of the spaces is the closed real interval. | A ] of spaces with the fixed-point property in general fails to have the fixed-point property even if one of the spaces is the closed real interval. | ||
The FPP is a ], i.e. is preserved by any ]. The FPP is also preserved by any ]. | The FPP is a ], i.e. is preserved by any ]. The FPP is also preserved by any ]. | ||
According to ] every ] and ] ] of a ] has the FPP. More generally, according to the ] every ] and ] subset of a ] has the FPP. Compactness alone does not imply the FPP and convexity is not even a topological property so it makes sense to ask how to topologically characterize the FPP. In 1932 ] asked whether compactness together with ] could be a sufficient condition for the FPP to hold. The problem was open for 20 years until the conjecture was disproved by Kinoshita who found an example of a compact contractible space without the FPP.<ref>Kinoshita, S. On Some Contractible Continua without Fixed Point Property. ''Fund. Math.'' '''40''' (1953), 96–98</ref> | According to the ], every ] and ] ] of a ] has the FPP. More generally, according to the ] every ] and ] subset of a ] has the FPP. Compactness alone does not imply the FPP and convexity is not even a topological property so it makes sense to ask how to topologically characterize the FPP. In 1932 ] asked whether compactness together with ] could be a sufficient condition for the FPP to hold. The problem was open for 20 years until the conjecture was disproved by Kinoshita who found an example of a compact contractible space without the FPP.<ref>Kinoshita, S. On Some Contractible Continua without Fixed Point Property. ''Fund. Math.'' '''40''' (1953), 96–98</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | |||
<references/> | |||
*{{cite book | first = Norman Steenrod | last = |
*{{cite book | first = Norman Steenrod | last = Samuel Eilenberg | author-link = Samuel Eilenberg | title = Foundations of Algebraic Topology | publisher = Princeton University Press | year = 1952}} | ||
*{{cite book | first = Bernd | last = Schröder | title = Ordered Sets | publisher = Birkhäuser Boston | year = 2002}} | *{{cite book | first = Bernd | last = Schröder | title = Ordered Sets | publisher = Birkhäuser Boston | year = 2002}} | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 13:51, 25 September 2024
Mathematical propertyA mathematical object X has the fixed-point property if every suitably well-behaved mapping from X to itself has a fixed point. The term is most commonly used to describe topological spaces on which every continuous mapping has a fixed point. But another use is in order theory, where a partially ordered set P is said to have the fixed point property if every increasing function on P has a fixed point.
Definition
Let A be an object in the concrete category C. Then A has the fixed-point property if every morphism (i.e., every function) has a fixed point.
The most common usage is when C = Top is the category of topological spaces. Then a topological space X has the fixed-point property if every continuous map has a fixed point.
Examples
Singletons
In the category of sets, the objects with the fixed-point property are precisely the singletons.
The closed interval
The closed interval has the fixed point property: Let f: → be a continuous mapping. If f(0) = 0 or f(1) = 1, then our mapping has a fixed point at 0 or 1. If not, then f(0) > 0 and f(1) − 1 < 0. Thus the function g(x) = f(x) − x is a continuous real valued function which is positive at x = 0 and negative at x = 1. By the intermediate value theorem, there is some point x0 with g(x0) = 0, which is to say that f(x0) − x0 = 0, and so x0 is a fixed point.
The open interval does not have the fixed-point property. The mapping f(x) = x has no fixed point on the interval (0,1).
The closed disc
The closed interval is a special case of the closed disc, which in any finite dimension has the fixed-point property by the Brouwer fixed-point theorem.
Topology
A retract A of a space X with the fixed-point property also has the fixed-point property. This is because if is a retraction and is any continuous function, then the composition (where is inclusion) has a fixed point. That is, there is such that . Since we have that and therefore
A topological space has the fixed-point property if and only if its identity map is universal.
A product of spaces with the fixed-point property in general fails to have the fixed-point property even if one of the spaces is the closed real interval.
The FPP is a topological invariant, i.e. is preserved by any homeomorphism. The FPP is also preserved by any retraction.
According to the Brouwer fixed-point theorem, every compact and convex subset of a Euclidean space has the FPP. More generally, according to the Schauder-Tychonoff fixed point theorem every compact and convex subset of a locally convex topological vector space has the FPP. Compactness alone does not imply the FPP and convexity is not even a topological property so it makes sense to ask how to topologically characterize the FPP. In 1932 Borsuk asked whether compactness together with contractibility could be a sufficient condition for the FPP to hold. The problem was open for 20 years until the conjecture was disproved by Kinoshita who found an example of a compact contractible space without the FPP.
References
- Kinoshita, S. On Some Contractible Continua without Fixed Point Property. Fund. Math. 40 (1953), 96–98
- Samuel Eilenberg, Norman Steenrod (1952). Foundations of Algebraic Topology. Princeton University Press.
- Schröder, Bernd (2002). Ordered Sets. Birkhäuser Boston.