Revision as of 22:06, 29 January 2023 editJArthur1984 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,821 edits Incorrect. Not self-published. This is a peer-reviewed academic text originally published by Brill Academic Publishers in the European market and then re-published in the American market by Haymarket.Tag: Undo← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:45, 26 September 2024 edit undoAhri Boy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,119 editsNo edit summaryTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit | ||
(19 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Aspect of Chinese industry}} | {{Short description|Aspect of Chinese industry}} | ||
{{undue weight|date=May 2021}} | |||
]] is the leading producer of ] in ], accounting for about 20% of the world's cotton production and 80% of China's domestic cotton production. Critics of the industry's practices have alleged widespread human rights abuses, prompting global boycotts. China rejects accusations that any human rights abuses occur either within the '''Xinjiang cotton industry''' or within China overall. | ]] is the leading producer of ] in ], accounting for about 20% of the world's cotton production and 80% of China's domestic cotton production. Critics of the industry's practices have alleged widespread human rights abuses, prompting global boycotts. China rejects accusations that any human rights abuses occur either within the '''Xinjiang cotton industry''' or within China overall. | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
Throughout the lattermost portions of the 20th century, the government of China sought to turn Xinjiang into a regional cotton-producing powerhouse.<ref name="NB2000" /><ref name="Millward299" /> The management of cotton production in the region was heavily reformed in 1975, though this led to significantly decreased yields in 1976 and 1977.<ref>Xinjian Li, Qing He, Yujiang Yuan, and Fenglan Tang "Cold disasters: the most serious meteorological disasters to the cotton production in Xinjiang, China", Proc. SPIE 4890, Ecosystems Dynamics, Ecosystem-Society Interactions, and Remote Sensing Applications for Semi-Arid and Arid Land, (14 July 2003); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.466189 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210611050702/https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/?SSO=1 |date=2021-06-11 }}</ref> However, production rebounded and grew significantly after these years; cotton harvests increased by a factor of 27 between 1977 and 1997, when a total yield of 1.5 million tons was recorded.<ref name="NB2000">{{cite journal |last1=Becqelin |first1=Nicolas |title=Xinjiang in the Nineties |journal=] |date=July 2000 |volume=44 |issue=44 |pages=65–90 |doi=10.2307/2667477 |publisher=]|jstor=2667477 |s2cid=144549708 }}</ref><ref name="Millward299">{{cite book |last1=Millward |first1=James A |title=Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang |date=July 2009 |publisher=] |isbn=9780231139250 |page=299}}</ref> During the 1990s, the ] began to contribute significantly to Xinjiang's economy, being responsible for 40% of the region's cotton production in 1997.<ref name="NB2000" /> The mid-1990s also saw China use protectionist trade policies to support cotton growers, with the government paying a 20% higher price to purchase domestic cotton than foreign cotton of the same quality in order to support the cotton industry.<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last=Sautman|first=Barry|date=2000|title=Is Xinjiang an Internal Colony?|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23615559|journal=Inner Asia|volume=2|issue=2|pages=239–271|doi=10.1163/146481700793647788|jstor=23615559|access-date=2021-05-06|archive-date=2021-05-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210510154850/https://www.jstor.org/stable/23615559|url-status=live}}</ref> Despite the growth in cotton production until that point, Xinjiang's economy went into a recession during the late 1990s owing in part to a decrease in the international demand for cotton.<ref name=":8" /> Nevertheless, by the end of the 2nd millennium AD, half of the value of Xinjiang's total agricultural production was derived from cotton;<ref name=":8" /> Xinjiang had become the largest cotton-producing province in China and produced over one-quarter of all of China's domestically grown cotton by 2001.<ref name="Millward299" /> | Throughout the lattermost portions of the 20th century, the government of China sought to turn Xinjiang into a regional cotton-producing powerhouse.<ref name="NB2000" /><ref name="Millward299" /> The management of cotton production in the region was heavily reformed in 1975, though this led to significantly decreased yields in 1976 and 1977.<ref>Xinjian Li, Qing He, Yujiang Yuan, and Fenglan Tang "Cold disasters: the most serious meteorological disasters to the cotton production in Xinjiang, China", Proc. SPIE 4890, Ecosystems Dynamics, Ecosystem-Society Interactions, and Remote Sensing Applications for Semi-Arid and Arid Land, (14 July 2003); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.466189 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210611050702/https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/?SSO=1 |date=2021-06-11 }}</ref> However, production rebounded and grew significantly after these years; cotton harvests increased by a factor of 27 between 1977 and 1997, when a total yield of 1.5 million tons was recorded.<ref name="NB2000">{{cite journal |last1=Becqelin |first1=Nicolas |title=Xinjiang in the Nineties |journal=] |date=July 2000 |volume=44 |issue=44 |pages=65–90 |doi=10.2307/2667477 |publisher=]|jstor=2667477 |s2cid=144549708 }}</ref><ref name="Millward299">{{cite book |last1=Millward |first1=James A |title=Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang |date=July 2009 |publisher=] |isbn=9780231139250 |page=299}}</ref> During the 1990s, the ] began to contribute significantly to Xinjiang's economy, being responsible for 40% of the region's cotton production in 1997.<ref name="NB2000" /> The mid-1990s also saw China use protectionist trade policies to support cotton growers, with the government paying a 20% higher price to purchase domestic cotton than foreign cotton of the same quality in order to support the cotton industry.<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last=Sautman|first=Barry|date=2000|title=Is Xinjiang an Internal Colony?|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23615559|journal=Inner Asia|volume=2|issue=2|pages=239–271|doi=10.1163/146481700793647788|jstor=23615559|access-date=2021-05-06|archive-date=2021-05-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210510154850/https://www.jstor.org/stable/23615559|url-status=live}}</ref> Despite the growth in cotton production until that point, Xinjiang's economy went into a recession during the late 1990s owing in part to a decrease in the international demand for cotton.<ref name=":8" /> Nevertheless, by the end of the 2nd millennium AD, half of the value of Xinjiang's total agricultural production was derived from cotton;<ref name=":8" /> Xinjiang had become the largest cotton-producing province in China and produced over one-quarter of all of China's domestically grown cotton by 2001.<ref name="Millward299" /> | ||
In 2003 China began prioritizing ] over upland cotton, due to ELS |
In 2003 China began prioritizing ] over upland cotton, due to ELS cotton's climactic preferences this shifted the Chinese cotton industry from the Yangtze River Region and Huang He Region to Xinjiang.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Mullins |first1=Anna |title=The Past, Present, Future Of Chinese ELS Cotton |url=https://www.cottongrower.com/cotton-production/production-outlook-acreage/the-past-present-future-of-chinese-els-cotton/ |website=www.cottongrower.com |date=29 January 2009 |publisher=Cotton Grower |access-date=3 May 2021 |archive-date=28 September 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170928055617/http://www.cottongrower.com/cotton-production/production-outlook-acreage/the-past-present-future-of-chinese-els-cotton/ |url-status=live }}</ref> As of 2009, the bulk of China's cotton supply was harvested through the use of labor-heavy cultivation methods. At that time, cotton in the region faced unique challenges in production, with over one-fifth of cotton plants experiencing disease and chronic shortages of laborers willing to pick cotton hindering the efficiency and effectiveness of cotton cultivation.<ref>Zhao, X., & Tisdell, C. A. (2009). ''The sustainability of cotton production in China and in Australia: Comparative economic and environmental issues'' (Working Paper No. 1741-2016-140564). http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.55338 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210611050705/https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/55338 |date=2021-06-11 }}</ref> | ||
In 2019, Xinjiang was responsible for 84% of |
In 2019, Xinjiang was responsible for 84% of China's cotton production. Most of the cotton grown in Xinjiang is high quality extra-long staple length cotton.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Cosgrove |first1=Emma |title=Uighur labor will be tough to avoid with about 20% of cotton connected to Xinjiang: GlobalData |url=https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/uighur-labor-will-be-tough-to-avoid-in-cotton-supply-chains/586217/ |website=www.supplychaindive.com |publisher=Supply Chain Dive |access-date=3 May 2021 |archive-date=7 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210407234102/https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/uighur-labor-will-be-tough-to-avoid-in-cotton-supply-chains/586217/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Annual production is approximately 5 million tonnes. Due to trade tensions and allegations of forced labor, pressure has been placed on cotton growers and suppliers, with small firms being the hardest hit.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Zhou |first1=Cissy |title=Xinjiang cotton ban uncertainties weigh on Chinese farmers, smaller textile firms |url=https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3129610/xinjiang-cotton-ban-uncertainties-weigh-chinese-farmers |website=www.scmp.com |date=16 April 2021 |publisher=South China Morning Post |access-date=3 May 2021 |archive-date=3 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210503042112/https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3129610/xinjiang-cotton-ban-uncertainties-weigh-chinese-farmers |url-status=live }}</ref> Xinjiang accounts for a fifth of the world's cotton production.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Davidson|first1=Helen|title=Xinjiang: more than half a million forced to pick cotton, report suggests|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/15/xinjiang-china-more-than-half-a-million-forced-to-pick-cotton-report-finds|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210502234352/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/15/xinjiang-china-more-than-half-a-million-forced-to-pick-cotton-report-finds|archive-date=2 May 2021|access-date=3 May 2021|website=]|date=15 December 2020}}</ref> | ||
] is one of the main importers of Xinjiang cotton.<ref name=":Han">{{Cite book |last=Han |first=Enze |title=The Ripple Effect: China's Complex Presence in Southeast Asia |date=2024 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-19-769659-0 |location=New York, NY}}</ref>{{Rp|page=45}} | |||
== Forced labor allegations == | == Forced labor allegations == | ||
{{POV section|date=May 2021}} | {{POV section|date=May 2021}} | ||
The cotton industry in Xinjiang has been accused of using large-scale ] in the production of cotton following the creation of the ].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Keena|first=Colm|date=29 April 2021|title='We don't know if he is alive': Uighur woman speaks out on jailing of father in Xinjiang|newspaper=]|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/asia-pacific/we-don-t-know-if-he-is-alive-uighur-woman-speaks-out-on-jailing-of-father-in-xinjiang-1.4551124|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=30 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210430131811/https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/asia-pacific/we-don-t-know-if-he-is-alive-uighur-woman-speaks-out-on-jailing-of-father-in-xinjiang-1.4551124|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Allen-Ebrahimian|first=Bethany|date=5 Jan 2021|title=The scope of forced labor in Xinjiang is bigger than we knew|work=]|url=https://www.axios.com/xinjiang-forced-labor-uyghurs-a3b58b6e-c98f-4ce4-ae52-7b4a37fa61f5.html|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=3 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210503235620/https://www.axios.com/xinjiang-forced-labor-uyghurs-a3b58b6e-c98f-4ce4-ae52-7b4a37fa61f5.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Kriebitz|first1=Alexander|last2=Man|first2=Raphael|date=22 May 2020|title=The Xinjiang Case and Its Implications from a Business Ethics Perspective|journal=]|volume=21|issue=3|pages=243–265|doi=10.1007/s12142-020-00591-0|s2cid=219509907|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite news|date=14 January 2021|title=U.S. to block cotton from Chinese region over Uighur crackdown|work=]|agency=]|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-s-block-cotton-chinese-region-over-uighur-crackdown-n1254237|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=3 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210503235621/https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-s-block-cotton-chinese-region-over-uighur-crackdown-n1254237|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=9 January 2021|title=Congress is moving to block goods made with the forced labour of Uyghurs|newspaper=]|url=https://www.economist.com/united-states/2021/01/09/congress-is-moving-to-block-goods-made-with-the-forced-labour-of-uyghurs|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=4 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504133156/https://www.economist.com/united-states/2021/01/09/congress-is-moving-to-block-goods-made-with-the-forced-labour-of-uyghurs|url-status=live}}</ref> The Chinese government rejects these accusations pointing to inconsistencies in the evidence from former Xinjiang residents.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-04-25|title=Why getting to the heart of Xinjiang forced labour claims is so hard|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3131010/xinjiang-cotton-why-it-so-hard-find-out-truth-about-forced|access-date=2021-08-27|website=South China Morning Post|language=en}}</ref> Instead, China characterises such programs as efforts to stimulate economic growth, provide vocational training and help combat ].<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite news|last=|first=|date=2021-03-25|title=Old H&M comment on 'forced labour' in China's Xinjiang raises online storm|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-xinjiang-cotton-idUSKBN2BG1G4|access-date=2021-08-27}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2021-03-26|title=Xinjiang cotton: Western clothes brands vanish as backlash grows|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-56533560|access-date=2021-08-27}}</ref> | The cotton industry in Xinjiang has been accused of using large-scale ] in the production of cotton following the creation of the ].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Keena|first=Colm|date=29 April 2021|title='We don't know if he is alive': Uighur woman speaks out on jailing of father in Xinjiang|newspaper=]|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/asia-pacific/we-don-t-know-if-he-is-alive-uighur-woman-speaks-out-on-jailing-of-father-in-xinjiang-1.4551124|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=30 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210430131811/https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/asia-pacific/we-don-t-know-if-he-is-alive-uighur-woman-speaks-out-on-jailing-of-father-in-xinjiang-1.4551124|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Allen-Ebrahimian|first=Bethany|date=5 Jan 2021|title=The scope of forced labor in Xinjiang is bigger than we knew|work=]|url=https://www.axios.com/xinjiang-forced-labor-uyghurs-a3b58b6e-c98f-4ce4-ae52-7b4a37fa61f5.html|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=3 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210503235620/https://www.axios.com/xinjiang-forced-labor-uyghurs-a3b58b6e-c98f-4ce4-ae52-7b4a37fa61f5.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Kriebitz|first1=Alexander|last2=Man|first2=Raphael|date=22 May 2020|title=The Xinjiang Case and Its Implications from a Business Ethics Perspective|journal=]|volume=21|issue=3|pages=243–265|doi=10.1007/s12142-020-00591-0|s2cid=219509907|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite news|date=14 January 2021|title=U.S. to block cotton from Chinese region over Uighur crackdown|work=]|agency=]|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-s-block-cotton-chinese-region-over-uighur-crackdown-n1254237|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=3 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210503235621/https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-s-block-cotton-chinese-region-over-uighur-crackdown-n1254237|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=9 January 2021|title=Congress is moving to block goods made with the forced labour of Uyghurs|newspaper=]|url=https://www.economist.com/united-states/2021/01/09/congress-is-moving-to-block-goods-made-with-the-forced-labour-of-uyghurs|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=4 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504133156/https://www.economist.com/united-states/2021/01/09/congress-is-moving-to-block-goods-made-with-the-forced-labour-of-uyghurs|url-status=live}}</ref> The Chinese government rejects these accusations pointing to inconsistencies in the evidence from former Xinjiang residents.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-04-25|title=Why getting to the heart of Xinjiang forced labour claims is so hard|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3131010/xinjiang-cotton-why-it-so-hard-find-out-truth-about-forced|access-date=2021-08-27|website=South China Morning Post|language=en|archive-date=2021-08-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210827035128/https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3131010/xinjiang-cotton-why-it-so-hard-find-out-truth-about-forced|url-status=live}}</ref> Instead, China characterises such programs as efforts to stimulate economic growth, provide vocational training and help combat ].<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite news|last=|first=|date=2021-03-25|title=Old H&M comment on 'forced labour' in China's Xinjiang raises online storm|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-xinjiang-cotton-idUSKBN2BG1G4|access-date=2021-08-27|archive-date=2021-03-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210329030419/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-xinjiang-cotton-idUSKBN2BG1G4|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2021-03-26|title=Xinjiang cotton: Western clothes brands vanish as backlash grows|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-56533560|access-date=2021-08-27|archive-date=2021-04-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210410182810/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-56533560|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
=== Reactions === | === Reactions === | ||
==== Reactions by business groups ==== | ==== Reactions by business groups ==== | ||
In March 2020, the ] (BCI) suspended licensing and assurance activities in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China due to "persistent allegations" of forced labor in the region.<ref>{{Cite web|title=BCI Pulls Out of Xinjiang|url=https://www.ecotextile.com/2020032725887/materials-production-news/bci-pulls-out-of-xinjiang.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210327144821/https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3AMJIDWDenhG4J%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecotextile.com%2F2020032725887%2Fmaterials-production-news%2Fbci-pulls-out-of-xinjiang.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-b-d|archive-date=2021-03-27|access-date=2021-05-03}}</ref> In October 2020, BCI ceased all field-level activities in Xinjiang, citing "sustained allegations of forced labour and other human rights abuses" in the region leading to "an increasingly untenable operating environment".<ref>{{Cite web|date=21 October 2020|title=Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) Update|url=https://bettercotton.org/where-is-better-cotton-grown/china/announcement-bci-suspends-licensing-in-western-china/|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201130201935/https://bettercotton.org/where-is-better-cotton-grown/china/announcement-bci-suspends-licensing-in-western-china/|archive-date=2020-11-30|access-date=2021-03-26|website=Better Cotton Initiative}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Clark|first=Evan|date=2020-10-21|title=Better Cotton Initiative Stops Xinjiang Field Activity|url=https://wwd.com/business-news/government-trade/bci-better-cotton-xinjiang-uyghur-china-field-1234641790/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210329002255/https://wwd.com/business-news/government-trade/bci-better-cotton-xinjiang-uyghur-china-field-1234641790/|archive-date=2021-03-29|access-date=2021-03-29|website=WWD|language=en-US}}</ref> On March 26, 2021, the BCI Shanghai representative office said it found no evidence of forced labor in Xinjiang. The office stated that since 2012, the Xinjiang project site has performed second-party credibility audits and third-party verifications over the years, to reach their findings.<ref>{{Cite news|title=BCI China Finds No Forced Labor|newspaper = Reuters|date = 26 March 2021|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bci-cotton-xinjiang/china-branch-of-cotton-trade-body-finds-no-forced-labour-in-xinjiang-idUSKBN2BI1KH?il=0|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210326113542/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bci-cotton-xinjiang/china-branch-of-cotton-trade-body-finds-no-forced-labour-in-xinjiang-idUSKBN2BI1KH?il=0|archive-date=2021-03-26|access-date=2021-05-03}}</ref> BCI subsequently removed its October 2020 statement from its website regarding the ceasing of field-level activities in Xinjiang.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Allen-Ebrahimian|first=Bethany|date=April 13, 2021|title=Xinjiang statement removed from cotton watchdog website|work=]|url=https://www.axios.com/xinjiang-cotton-watchdog-c32fd43b-16dd-4faf-a25a-2aebe9f892fd.html|url-status=live|access-date=April 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413155854/https://www.axios.com/xinjiang-cotton-watchdog-c32fd43b-16dd-4faf-a25a-2aebe9f892fd.html|archive-date=April 13, 2021}}</ref> | In March 2020, the ] (BCI) suspended licensing and assurance activities in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China due to "persistent allegations" of forced labor in the region.<ref>{{Cite web|title=BCI Pulls Out of Xinjiang|date=27 March 2020 |url=https://www.ecotextile.com/2020032725887/materials-production-news/bci-pulls-out-of-xinjiang.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210327144821/https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3AMJIDWDenhG4J%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecotextile.com%2F2020032725887%2Fmaterials-production-news%2Fbci-pulls-out-of-xinjiang.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-b-d|archive-date=2021-03-27|access-date=2021-05-03}}</ref> In October 2020, BCI ceased all field-level activities in Xinjiang, citing "sustained allegations of forced labour and other human rights abuses" in the region leading to "an increasingly untenable operating environment".<ref>{{Cite web|date=21 October 2020|title=Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) Update|url=https://bettercotton.org/where-is-better-cotton-grown/china/announcement-bci-suspends-licensing-in-western-china/|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201130201935/https://bettercotton.org/where-is-better-cotton-grown/china/announcement-bci-suspends-licensing-in-western-china/|archive-date=2020-11-30|access-date=2021-03-26|website=Better Cotton Initiative}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Clark|first=Evan|date=2020-10-21|title=Better Cotton Initiative Stops Xinjiang Field Activity|url=https://wwd.com/business-news/government-trade/bci-better-cotton-xinjiang-uyghur-china-field-1234641790/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210329002255/https://wwd.com/business-news/government-trade/bci-better-cotton-xinjiang-uyghur-china-field-1234641790/|archive-date=2021-03-29|access-date=2021-03-29|website=WWD|language=en-US}}</ref> On March 26, 2021, the BCI Shanghai representative office said it found no evidence of forced labor in Xinjiang. The office stated that since 2012, the Xinjiang project site has performed second-party credibility audits and third-party verifications over the years, to reach their findings.<ref>{{Cite news|title=BCI China Finds No Forced Labor|newspaper = Reuters|date = 26 March 2021|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bci-cotton-xinjiang/china-branch-of-cotton-trade-body-finds-no-forced-labour-in-xinjiang-idUSKBN2BI1KH?il=0|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210326113542/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bci-cotton-xinjiang/china-branch-of-cotton-trade-body-finds-no-forced-labour-in-xinjiang-idUSKBN2BI1KH?il=0|archive-date=2021-03-26|access-date=2021-05-03}}</ref> BCI subsequently removed its October 2020 statement from its website regarding the ceasing of field-level activities in Xinjiang.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Allen-Ebrahimian|first=Bethany|date=April 13, 2021|title=Xinjiang statement removed from cotton watchdog website|work=]|url=https://www.axios.com/xinjiang-cotton-watchdog-c32fd43b-16dd-4faf-a25a-2aebe9f892fd.html|url-status=live|access-date=April 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210413155854/https://www.axios.com/xinjiang-cotton-watchdog-c32fd43b-16dd-4faf-a25a-2aebe9f892fd.html|archive-date=April 13, 2021}}</ref> | ||
After the ] issued restrictions on the imports of cotton in Xinjiang in September 2020, global businesses began to decrease their use of cotton produced in Xinjiang.<ref name=":4">{{Cite news|last1=Horio|first1=Munemasa|last2=Hama|first2=Misa|date=2 May 2021|title=Xinjiang cotton and Myanmar jade show human rights pressure on commodities|work=]|url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Markets/Commodities/Xinjiang-cotton-and-Myanmar-jade-show-human-rights-pressure-on-commodities|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=4 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504230629/https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Markets/Commodities/Xinjiang-cotton-and-Myanmar-jade-show-human-rights-pressure-on-commodities|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite news|last1=Bermingham|first1=Finbarr|last2=Delaney|first2=Robert|last3=Fromer|first3=Jacob|date=15 September 2020|title=US issues restrictions on import of Xinjiang cotton and apparel products, citing forced labour|work=]|url=https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3101536/us-issues-restrictions-import-xinjiang-cotton-and-apparel|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=28 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210428082600/https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3101536/us-issues-restrictions-import-xinjiang-cotton-and-apparel|url-status=live}}</ref> | After the ] issued restrictions on the imports of cotton in Xinjiang in September 2020, global businesses began to decrease their use of cotton produced in Xinjiang.<ref name=":4">{{Cite news|last1=Horio|first1=Munemasa|last2=Hama|first2=Misa|date=2 May 2021|title=Xinjiang cotton and Myanmar jade show human rights pressure on commodities|work=]|url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Markets/Commodities/Xinjiang-cotton-and-Myanmar-jade-show-human-rights-pressure-on-commodities|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=4 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504230629/https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Markets/Commodities/Xinjiang-cotton-and-Myanmar-jade-show-human-rights-pressure-on-commodities|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite news|last1=Bermingham|first1=Finbarr|last2=Delaney|first2=Robert|last3=Fromer|first3=Jacob|date=15 September 2020|title=US issues restrictions on import of Xinjiang cotton and apparel products, citing forced labour|work=]|url=https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3101536/us-issues-restrictions-import-xinjiang-cotton-and-apparel|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=28 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210428082600/https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3101536/us-issues-restrictions-import-xinjiang-cotton-and-apparel|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
Chinese ] has called the reporting on forced labor in Xinjiang "baseless" and stated that any sort of boycott or sanction would harm cotton workers in Xinjiang.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|title=China slams U.S. for blocking cotton imports from Xinjiang - Xinhua {{!}} English.news.cn|url=http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-12/03/c_139561496.htm|access-date=2021-05-03|website=www.xinhuanet.com|archive-date=2021-05-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504155118/http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-12/03/c_139561496.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> A commentary published by the Chinese state-run ] said that BCI was part of a "western smear campaign".<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite web|title=Xinhua Commentary: BCI's cotton boycott against China is hasty and doomed to fail - Xinhua {{!}} English.news.cn|url=http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-03/30/c_139846876.htm|access-date=2021-05-03|website=www.xinhuanet.com|archive-date=2021-03-30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210330163926/http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-03/30/c_139846876.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Public opinion in China has largely been in line with the position of state media and institutions. Perceptions of popular opinion may be distorted because of widespread censorship of posts which do not match the ] (CCP) line.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Datt |first1=Angeli |title=The CCP Hand Behind China's Xinjiang Cotton Backlash |url=https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/the-ccp-hand-behind-chinas-xinjiang-cotton-backlash/ |website=thediplomat.com |publisher=The Diplomat |access-date=7 May 2021 |archive-date=6 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506124252/https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/the-ccp-hand-behind-chinas-xinjiang-cotton-backlash/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | Chinese ] has called the reporting on forced labor in Xinjiang "baseless" and stated that any sort of boycott or sanction would harm cotton workers in Xinjiang.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|title=China slams U.S. for blocking cotton imports from Xinjiang - Xinhua {{!}} English.news.cn|url=http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-12/03/c_139561496.htm|access-date=2021-05-03|website=www.xinhuanet.com|archive-date=2021-05-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504155118/http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-12/03/c_139561496.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> A commentary published by the Chinese state-run ] said that BCI was part of a "western smear campaign".<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite web|title=Xinhua Commentary: BCI's cotton boycott against China is hasty and doomed to fail - Xinhua {{!}} English.news.cn|url=http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-03/30/c_139846876.htm|access-date=2021-05-03|website=www.xinhuanet.com|archive-date=2021-03-30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210330163926/http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-03/30/c_139846876.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Public opinion in China has largely been in line with the position of state media and institutions. Perceptions of popular opinion may be distorted because of widespread censorship of posts which do not match the ] (CCP) line.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Datt |first1=Angeli |title=The CCP Hand Behind China's Xinjiang Cotton Backlash |url=https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/the-ccp-hand-behind-chinas-xinjiang-cotton-backlash/ |website=thediplomat.com |publisher=The Diplomat |access-date=7 May 2021 |archive-date=6 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506124252/https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/the-ccp-hand-behind-chinas-xinjiang-cotton-backlash/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
Decisions by various companies to stop buying Xinjiang cotton have led more than 40 celebrities from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, including ], ], Uyghur actress ], ], ], and ], to sever ties with those companies.<ref>{{cite news|last=Yan|first=Lim Ruey|date=26 March 2021|title=Over 40 celebrities end ties with fashion companies over Xinjiang cotton allegations|publisher=Straits Times|url=https://www.straitstimes.com/life/entertainment/celebrities-end-ties-with-fashion-companies-over-xinjiang-cotton-allegations|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210329065302/https://www.straitstimes.com/life/entertainment/celebrities-end-ties-with-fashion-companies-over-xinjiang-cotton-allegations|archive-date=29 March 2021|accessdate=3 May 2021}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite web|last1=Zhang|first1=Tianwei|last2=Ap|first2=Tiffany|last3=Clark|first3=Evan|date=2021-03-25|title=Xinjiang Cotton: Li Ning, Anta Shares Surge While Nike, Adidas, Burberry Hit With Backlash|url=https://wwd.com/business-news/retail/xinjiang-cotton-ban-china-nike-uniqlo-hm-1234787090/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210327230352/https://wwd.com/business-news/retail/xinjiang-cotton-ban-china-nike-uniqlo-hm-1234787090/|archive-date=2021-03-27|access-date=2021-03-28|website=WWD|language=en-US}}</ref> In March 2021, Chinese consumers began boycotting companies which had vowed not to use cotton from Xinjiang. Chinese consumers criticized ], which in September 2020 announced it would stop using a Chinese manufacturer accused of using forced labor, citing the BCI's decision to stop licensing Xinjiang cotton.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|last=McDonald|first=Joe|date=2021-03-25|title=China attacks foreign clothing, shoe brands over Xinjiang|url=https://apnews.com/article/china-boycott-hm-over-xinjiang-9e9a27b7179bd7a34330b8325ac37cdb|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210325225609/https://apnews.com/article/china-boycott-hm-over-xinjiang-9e9a27b7179bd7a34330b8325ac37cdb|archive-date=2021-03-25|access-date=2021-03-26|website=AP News}}</ref> '']'', the official newspaper of the ], named ], ] and all BCI members in online posts, calling for Chinese consumers to boycott these brands.<ref>{{Cite web|author=Ben Westcott and Laura He|title=H&M and Nike are facing a boycott in China over Xinjiang cotton statements|url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/25/business/hm-nike-xinjiang-cotton-boycott-intl-hnk/index.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210418112515/https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/25/business/hm-nike-xinjiang-cotton-boycott-intl-hnk/index.html|archive-date=2021-04-18|access-date=2021-03-28|website=CNN}}</ref> Amid the boycotts, Chinese sportswear company ] announced it was exiting the BCI, citing their statement on Xinjiang as "seriously concerning".<ref name=":3" /> In addition TV platforms blurred the logos of companies which were part of the controversy. It is near impossible to get accurate information about the situation in Xinjiang domestically in China.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Jordan |first1=Zoe |title=Xinjiang Cotton and the Shift in China's Censorship Approach |url=https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/xinjiang-cotton-and-the-shift-in-chinas-censorship-approach/ |website=thediplomat.com |publisher=The Diplomat |access-date=5 May 2021 |archive-date=4 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504171643/https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/xinjiang-cotton-and-the-shift-in-chinas-censorship-approach/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | Decisions by various companies to stop buying Xinjiang cotton have led more than 40 celebrities from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, including ], ], Uyghur actress ], ], ], and ], to sever ties with those companies.<ref>{{cite news|last=Yan|first=Lim Ruey|date=26 March 2021|title=Over 40 celebrities end ties with fashion companies over Xinjiang cotton allegations|publisher=Straits Times|url=https://www.straitstimes.com/life/entertainment/celebrities-end-ties-with-fashion-companies-over-xinjiang-cotton-allegations|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210329065302/https://www.straitstimes.com/life/entertainment/celebrities-end-ties-with-fashion-companies-over-xinjiang-cotton-allegations|archive-date=29 March 2021|accessdate=3 May 2021}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite web|last1=Zhang|first1=Tianwei|last2=Ap|first2=Tiffany|last3=Clark|first3=Evan|date=2021-03-25|title=Xinjiang Cotton: Li Ning, Anta Shares Surge While Nike, Adidas, Burberry Hit With Backlash|url=https://wwd.com/business-news/retail/xinjiang-cotton-ban-china-nike-uniqlo-hm-1234787090/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210327230352/https://wwd.com/business-news/retail/xinjiang-cotton-ban-china-nike-uniqlo-hm-1234787090/|archive-date=2021-03-27|access-date=2021-03-28|website=WWD|language=en-US}}</ref> In March 2021, Chinese consumers began boycotting companies which had vowed not to use cotton from Xinjiang. Chinese consumers criticized ], which in September 2020 announced it would stop using a Chinese manufacturer accused of using forced labor, citing the BCI's decision to stop licensing Xinjiang cotton.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|last=McDonald|first=Joe|date=2021-03-25|title=China attacks foreign clothing, shoe brands over Xinjiang|url=https://apnews.com/article/china-boycott-hm-over-xinjiang-9e9a27b7179bd7a34330b8325ac37cdb|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210325225609/https://apnews.com/article/china-boycott-hm-over-xinjiang-9e9a27b7179bd7a34330b8325ac37cdb|archive-date=2021-03-25|access-date=2021-03-26|website=AP News}}</ref> '']'', the official newspaper of the ], named ], ] and all BCI members in online posts, calling for Chinese consumers to boycott these brands.<ref>{{Cite web|author=Ben Westcott and Laura He|title=H&M and Nike are facing a boycott in China over Xinjiang cotton statements|url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/25/business/hm-nike-xinjiang-cotton-boycott-intl-hnk/index.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210418112515/https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/25/business/hm-nike-xinjiang-cotton-boycott-intl-hnk/index.html|archive-date=2021-04-18|access-date=2021-03-28|website=CNN|date=25 March 2021 }}</ref> Amid the boycotts, Chinese sportswear company ] announced it was exiting the BCI, citing their statement on Xinjiang as "seriously concerning".<ref name=":3" /> In addition TV platforms blurred the logos of companies which were part of the controversy. It is near impossible to get accurate information about the situation in Xinjiang domestically in China.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Jordan |first1=Zoe |title=Xinjiang Cotton and the Shift in China's Censorship Approach |url=https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/xinjiang-cotton-and-the-shift-in-chinas-censorship-approach/ |website=thediplomat.com |publisher=The Diplomat |access-date=5 May 2021 |archive-date=4 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210504171643/https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/xinjiang-cotton-and-the-shift-in-chinas-censorship-approach/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
] has accused the United States of hypocrisy over the issue pointing to the legacy of ] particularly the history of ] and ] of ] in the cotton fields of the ]. In March 2021 she ] two pictures side by side, one a historical photo of cotton farmers in Mississippi and the other a photo of three smiling workers collecting cotton in Xinjiang, with the caption "#Mississippi in 1908 vs #Xinjiang in 2015 A shotgun and several hounds vs smiles and harvests. Forced labor?"<ref>{{cite news |last1=Xiao |first1=Eva |title=China Used Twitter, Facebook More Than Ever Last Year for Xinjiang Propaganda |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-used-twitter-facebook-more-than-ever-last-year-for-xinjiang-propaganda-11617101007 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=30 March 2021 |access-date=6 May 2021 |archive-date=5 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210505223808/https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-used-twitter-facebook-more-than-ever-last-year-for-xinjiang-propaganda-11617101007 |url-status=live }}</ref> | ] has accused the United States of hypocrisy over the issue pointing to the legacy of ] particularly the history of ] and ] of ] in the cotton fields of the ]. In March 2021 she ] two pictures side by side, one a historical photo of cotton farmers in Mississippi and the other a photo of three smiling workers collecting cotton in Xinjiang, with the caption "#Mississippi in 1908 vs #Xinjiang in 2015 A shotgun and several hounds vs smiles and harvests. Forced labor?"<ref>{{cite news |last1=Xiao |first1=Eva |title=China Used Twitter, Facebook More Than Ever Last Year for Xinjiang Propaganda |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-used-twitter-facebook-more-than-ever-last-year-for-xinjiang-propaganda-11617101007 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=30 March 2021 |access-date=6 May 2021 |archive-date=5 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210505223808/https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-used-twitter-facebook-more-than-ever-last-year-for-xinjiang-propaganda-11617101007 |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
In September 24, 2024, China raised the issue of cotton with ]<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-09-24 |title=China raises Xinjiang cotton with parent firm for Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger |url=https://www.scmp.com/economy/global-economy/article/3279760/china-probe-calvin-klein-tommy-hilfiger-parent-firm-over-xinjiang-cotton |access-date=2024-09-26 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref> | |||
===== United States ===== | ===== United States ===== | ||
Line 39: | Line 42: | ||
In July 2020, the United States passed the ], which instituted tracking and reporting requirements regarding China's abuses against Turkic Muslims and called for sanctions on individuals and organizations involved in the persecution thereof.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web|date=2021|title=US Responses to China's Crimes Against the Uyghurs|url=https://www.ushmm.org/genocide-prevention/countries/china/case-study/response/us-responses-to-chinas-crimes-against-the-uyghurs|url-status=live|access-date=5 May 2021|website=]|archive-date=5 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210505055926/https://www.ushmm.org/genocide-prevention/countries/china/case-study/response/us-responses-to-chinas-crimes-against-the-uyghurs}}</ref> | In July 2020, the United States passed the ], which instituted tracking and reporting requirements regarding China's abuses against Turkic Muslims and called for sanctions on individuals and organizations involved in the persecution thereof.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web|date=2021|title=US Responses to China's Crimes Against the Uyghurs|url=https://www.ushmm.org/genocide-prevention/countries/china/case-study/response/us-responses-to-chinas-crimes-against-the-uyghurs|url-status=live|access-date=5 May 2021|website=]|archive-date=5 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210505055926/https://www.ushmm.org/genocide-prevention/countries/china/case-study/response/us-responses-to-chinas-crimes-against-the-uyghurs}}</ref> | ||
According to the ], "he US Department of Homeland Security detained shipments at United States ports of entry containing cotton and cotton products originating from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps based on credible information that these products were made using forced labor."<ref name=":6" /> In September 2020, the United States began to restrict the imports of cotton from Xinjiang.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":5" /> In January 2021, the United States banned the import of cotton produced in Xinjiang in a move aimed at pressuring the Chinese Government to end the ].<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Waller|first1=James|last2=Salazar Albornoz|first2=Mariana|date=27 April 2021|title=Crime and No Punishment? China's Abuses Against the Uyghurs|url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/789548|journal=]|volume=22|issue=1|pages=100–111|doi=10.1353/gia.2021.0000|s2cid=235855240 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Bain|first=Marc|date=13 January 2021|title=The US is intensifying its crackdown on forced labor in China's Xinjiang region|work=]|url=https://qz.com/1956856/the-us-has-issued-a-sweeping-ban-on-cotton-from-chinas-xinjiang/|access-date=3 May 2021|archive-date=30 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210430095059/https://qz.com/1956856/the-us-has-issued-a-sweeping-ban-on-cotton-from-chinas-xinjiang/|url-status=live}}</ref> | According to the ], "he US Department of Homeland Security detained shipments at United States ports of entry containing cotton and cotton products originating from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps based on credible information that these products were made using forced labor."<ref name=":6" /> In September 2020, the United States began to restrict the imports of cotton from Xinjiang.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":5" /> In January 2021, the United States banned the import of cotton produced in Xinjiang in a move aimed at pressuring the Chinese Government to end the ].<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Waller|first1=James|last2=Salazar Albornoz|first2=Mariana|date=27 April 2021|title=Crime and No Punishment? China's Abuses Against the Uyghurs|url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/789548|journal=]|volume=22|issue=1|pages=100–111|doi=10.1353/gia.2021.0000|s2cid=235855240|access-date=4 May 2021|archive-date=25 April 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220425051340/https://muse.jhu.edu/article/789548|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Bain|first=Marc|date=13 January 2021|title=The US is intensifying its crackdown on forced labor in China's Xinjiang region|work=]|url=https://qz.com/1956856/the-us-has-issued-a-sweeping-ban-on-cotton-from-chinas-xinjiang/|access-date=3 May 2021|archive-date=30 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210430095059/https://qz.com/1956856/the-us-has-issued-a-sweeping-ban-on-cotton-from-chinas-xinjiang/|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
The United States-based ] has described Xinjiang as a "cotton ]".<ref name=":7">{{Cite news|last=Bain|first=Marc|title=Clothing made by Chinese forced labor is likely being sold in the US|work=]|url=https://qz.com/1732084/forced-uyghur-labor-in-chinas-xinjiang-could-be-making-us-sold-clothing/|url-status=live|access-date=2019-12-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191204233540/https://qz.com/1732084/forced-uyghur-labor-in-chinas-xinjiang-could-be-making-us-sold-clothing/|archive-date=2019-12-04}}</ref> | The United States-based ] has described Xinjiang as a "cotton ]".<ref name=":7">{{Cite news|last=Bain|first=Marc|title=Clothing made by Chinese forced labor is likely being sold in the US|work=]|url=https://qz.com/1732084/forced-uyghur-labor-in-chinas-xinjiang-could-be-making-us-sold-clothing/|url-status=live|access-date=2019-12-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191204233540/https://qz.com/1732084/forced-uyghur-labor-in-chinas-xinjiang-could-be-making-us-sold-clothing/|archive-date=2019-12-04}}</ref> | ||
=====Taiwan===== | =====Taiwan===== | ||
In 2021, Taiwanese Legislative Speaker ] said that cotton from |
In 2021, Taiwanese Legislative Speaker ] said that cotton from China's Xinjiang region was not just a political issue but was becoming a human rights issue.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Strong |first1=Matthew |title=Xinjiang cotton is a human rights issue: Taiwan legislative speaker |url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4161982 |website=www.taiwannews.com.tw |date=27 March 2021 |publisher=Taiwan News |access-date=5 May 2021 |archive-date=5 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210505233153/https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4161982 |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
Asked about the controversy, Taipei Mayor ] said that “The trade war between the US and China will certainly continue, but China still has to improve its human rights.”<ref>{{cite web |last1=I-chia |first1=Lee |title=Ko weighs in on Xinjiang cotton |url=https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2021/03/29/2003754690 |website=www.taipeitimes.com |date=29 March 2021 |publisher=Taipei Times |access-date=5 May 2021 |archive-date=5 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210505233643/https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2021/03/29/2003754690 |url-status=live }}</ref> | Asked about the controversy, Taipei Mayor ] said that “The trade war between the US and China will certainly continue, but China still has to improve its human rights.”<ref>{{cite web |last1=I-chia |first1=Lee |title=Ko weighs in on Xinjiang cotton |url=https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2021/03/29/2003754690 |website=www.taipeitimes.com |date=29 March 2021 |publisher=Taipei Times |access-date=5 May 2021 |archive-date=5 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210505233643/https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2021/03/29/2003754690 |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
===== United Kingdom ===== | ===== United Kingdom ===== | ||
The London |
The London-based ] has spoken out against conditions in the Xinjiang cotton industry and has pressured both businesses and governments to address the situation.<ref>{{cite web |last1=SUTHERLAND |first1=EMILY |title=Are you selling China's slave cotton? |url=https://www.drapersonline.com/insight/analysis/are-you-selling-chinas-slave-cotton |website=www.drapersonline.com |date=2 March 2021 |publisher=Drapers |access-date=13 July 2021 |archive-date=13 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210713230059/https://www.drapersonline.com/insight/analysis/are-you-selling-chinas-slave-cotton |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
In April 2020, the ] (WUC) presented to UK's ] evidence of forced labour in Xinjiang and argued that the NCA should have investigated the UK's cotton proceeds under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA). The NCA declined investigation, after which the WUC challenged the NCA in court and was dismissed by the High Court in January 2023.<ref name="leigh-day-2024">{{cite web |last1=Renshaw |first1=Matthew |last2=Hayward |first2=Anthony |title=UK companies risk prosecution after National Crime Agency’s failure to investigate cotton imports from the Uyghur region is ruled unlawful |url=https://www.leighday.co.uk/news/blog/2024-blogs/uk-companies-risk-prosecution-after-national-crime-agency-s-failure-to-investigate-cotton-imports-from-the-uyghur-region-is-ruled-unlawful/ |website=Leigh day |access-date=5 August 2024}}</ref> | |||
In June 2024, the ] ruled that the ] must reconsider whether to open an investigation into cotton from Xinjiang. In response, UK director of the WUC, Rahima Mahmut, called the decision "a monumental victory and a moral triumph"<ref>{{Cite news |date=June 27, 2024 |title=Uyghur group wins appeal over UK investigation into 'slave labour' cotton |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uyghur-group-wins-appeal-over-uk-probe-into-slave-labour-cotton-2024-06-27/ |access-date=July 1, 2024 |work=] |archive-date=June 27, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240627193708/https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uyghur-group-wins-appeal-over-uk-probe-into-slave-labour-cotton-2024-06-27/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==== Academic analysis ==== | ==== Academic analysis ==== | ||
] (Associate Professor of Economics at ]) and ] (Associate Professor in Sociology at ]) write that there is insufficient support for claims of forced labor in Xinjiang. They cite the historic significance of Uyghur agricultural workers as a long-standing labor force for manual cotton harvesting and staffing companies' widespread recruitment of Uyghur workers due to lower travel costs. In their view, "... the labor demand of Uyghur seasonal cotton pickers in south Xinjiang is largely decided by its relatively low degree of agricultural capitalization, not due to the 'special treatment' towards labor migrants of a certain ethnic minority."<ref name="The Political Economy of US Sanctions against China 2021 pp. 306–320">{{cite book | author=Zhun Xu and Fangfei Lin|title=Sanctions as War | chapter=The Political Economy of US Sanctions against China | publisher=BRILL | date=9 December 2021 | doi=10.1163/9789004501201_019 | pages=306–320|isbn=9789004501201 |s2cid=245392880 }}</ref> | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Line 66: | Line 73: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 16:45, 26 September 2024
Aspect of Chinese industryXinjiang is the leading producer of cotton in China, accounting for about 20% of the world's cotton production and 80% of China's domestic cotton production. Critics of the industry's practices have alleged widespread human rights abuses, prompting global boycotts. China rejects accusations that any human rights abuses occur either within the Xinjiang cotton industry or within China overall.
History
The cotton industry has a long history in Xinjiang, with cotton having been grown in the region since the 1st millennium AD.
Modern era
At the turn of the 20th century, Xinjiang was a producer of raw goods, including cotton. Turfan was Xinjiang's biggest producer of cotton, with 60% of its cotton exported to Russia, and around 45% of Kashgar's exports (1.35 million roubles out of 3 million total exports) to Russia in 1902 were of cotton cloth. The Russian Revolution coincided with a decrease in cotton exports from Xinjiang to Russia, significantly harming the cotton industry and the local economy as a whole.
Throughout the lattermost portions of the 20th century, the government of China sought to turn Xinjiang into a regional cotton-producing powerhouse. The management of cotton production in the region was heavily reformed in 1975, though this led to significantly decreased yields in 1976 and 1977. However, production rebounded and grew significantly after these years; cotton harvests increased by a factor of 27 between 1977 and 1997, when a total yield of 1.5 million tons was recorded. During the 1990s, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps began to contribute significantly to Xinjiang's economy, being responsible for 40% of the region's cotton production in 1997. The mid-1990s also saw China use protectionist trade policies to support cotton growers, with the government paying a 20% higher price to purchase domestic cotton than foreign cotton of the same quality in order to support the cotton industry. Despite the growth in cotton production until that point, Xinjiang's economy went into a recession during the late 1990s owing in part to a decrease in the international demand for cotton. Nevertheless, by the end of the 2nd millennium AD, half of the value of Xinjiang's total agricultural production was derived from cotton; Xinjiang had become the largest cotton-producing province in China and produced over one-quarter of all of China's domestically grown cotton by 2001.
In 2003 China began prioritizing extra-long staple (ELS) cotton over upland cotton, due to ELS cotton's climactic preferences this shifted the Chinese cotton industry from the Yangtze River Region and Huang He Region to Xinjiang. As of 2009, the bulk of China's cotton supply was harvested through the use of labor-heavy cultivation methods. At that time, cotton in the region faced unique challenges in production, with over one-fifth of cotton plants experiencing disease and chronic shortages of laborers willing to pick cotton hindering the efficiency and effectiveness of cotton cultivation.
In 2019, Xinjiang was responsible for 84% of China's cotton production. Most of the cotton grown in Xinjiang is high quality extra-long staple length cotton. Annual production is approximately 5 million tonnes. Due to trade tensions and allegations of forced labor, pressure has been placed on cotton growers and suppliers, with small firms being the hardest hit. Xinjiang accounts for a fifth of the world's cotton production.
Vietnam is one of the main importers of Xinjiang cotton.
Forced labor allegations
The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (May 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The cotton industry in Xinjiang has been accused of using large-scale forced labor in the production of cotton following the creation of the Xinjiang internment camps. The Chinese government rejects these accusations pointing to inconsistencies in the evidence from former Xinjiang residents. Instead, China characterises such programs as efforts to stimulate economic growth, provide vocational training and help combat extremism.
Reactions
Reactions by business groups
In March 2020, the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) suspended licensing and assurance activities in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China due to "persistent allegations" of forced labor in the region. In October 2020, BCI ceased all field-level activities in Xinjiang, citing "sustained allegations of forced labour and other human rights abuses" in the region leading to "an increasingly untenable operating environment". On March 26, 2021, the BCI Shanghai representative office said it found no evidence of forced labor in Xinjiang. The office stated that since 2012, the Xinjiang project site has performed second-party credibility audits and third-party verifications over the years, to reach their findings. BCI subsequently removed its October 2020 statement from its website regarding the ceasing of field-level activities in Xinjiang.
After the United States issued restrictions on the imports of cotton in Xinjiang in September 2020, global businesses began to decrease their use of cotton produced in Xinjiang.
Reactions by country
China
Chinese state media has called the reporting on forced labor in Xinjiang "baseless" and stated that any sort of boycott or sanction would harm cotton workers in Xinjiang. A commentary published by the Chinese state-run Xinhua News Agency said that BCI was part of a "western smear campaign". Public opinion in China has largely been in line with the position of state media and institutions. Perceptions of popular opinion may be distorted because of widespread censorship of posts which do not match the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) line.
Decisions by various companies to stop buying Xinjiang cotton have led more than 40 celebrities from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, including Eddie Peng, Eason Chan, Uyghur actress Dilraba Dilmurat, Huang Xuan, Victoria Song, and Zhou Dongyu, to sever ties with those companies. In March 2021, Chinese consumers began boycotting companies which had vowed not to use cotton from Xinjiang. Chinese consumers criticized H&M, which in September 2020 announced it would stop using a Chinese manufacturer accused of using forced labor, citing the BCI's decision to stop licensing Xinjiang cotton. People's Daily, the official newspaper of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, named New Balance, Burberry and all BCI members in online posts, calling for Chinese consumers to boycott these brands. Amid the boycotts, Chinese sportswear company Anta Sports announced it was exiting the BCI, citing their statement on Xinjiang as "seriously concerning". In addition TV platforms blurred the logos of companies which were part of the controversy. It is near impossible to get accurate information about the situation in Xinjiang domestically in China.
Hua Chunying has accused the United States of hypocrisy over the issue pointing to the legacy of racism in the United States particularly the history of slavery and exploitation of African Americans in the cotton fields of the American South. In March 2021 she tweeted two pictures side by side, one a historical photo of cotton farmers in Mississippi and the other a photo of three smiling workers collecting cotton in Xinjiang, with the caption "#Mississippi in 1908 vs #Xinjiang in 2015 A shotgun and several hounds vs smiles and harvests. Forced labor?"
In September 24, 2024, China raised the issue of cotton with PVH Corp.
United States
See also: Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention ActIn July 2020, the United States passed the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act, which instituted tracking and reporting requirements regarding China's abuses against Turkic Muslims and called for sanctions on individuals and organizations involved in the persecution thereof.
According to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, "he US Department of Homeland Security detained shipments at United States ports of entry containing cotton and cotton products originating from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps based on credible information that these products were made using forced labor." In September 2020, the United States began to restrict the imports of cotton from Xinjiang. In January 2021, the United States banned the import of cotton produced in Xinjiang in a move aimed at pressuring the Chinese Government to end the persecution of Uyghurs in China.
The United States-based Uyghur Human Rights Project has described Xinjiang as a "cotton gulag".
Taiwan
In 2021, Taiwanese Legislative Speaker You Si-kun said that cotton from China's Xinjiang region was not just a political issue but was becoming a human rights issue.
Asked about the controversy, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je said that “The trade war between the US and China will certainly continue, but China still has to improve its human rights.”
United Kingdom
The London-based Anti-Slavery International has spoken out against conditions in the Xinjiang cotton industry and has pressured both businesses and governments to address the situation.
In April 2020, the World Uyghur Congress (WUC) presented to UK's National Crime Agency evidence of forced labour in Xinjiang and argued that the NCA should have investigated the UK's cotton proceeds under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA). The NCA declined investigation, after which the WUC challenged the NCA in court and was dismissed by the High Court in January 2023.
In June 2024, the Court of Appeal ruled that the National Crime Agency must reconsider whether to open an investigation into cotton from Xinjiang. In response, UK director of the WUC, Rahima Mahmut, called the decision "a monumental victory and a moral triumph"
Academic analysis
Zhun Xu (Associate Professor of Economics at John Jay College) and Fangfei Lin (Associate Professor in Sociology at Xinjiang University) write that there is insufficient support for claims of forced labor in Xinjiang. They cite the historic significance of Uyghur agricultural workers as a long-standing labor force for manual cotton harvesting and staffing companies' widespread recruitment of Uyghur workers due to lower travel costs. In their view, "... the labor demand of Uyghur seasonal cotton pickers in south Xinjiang is largely decided by its relatively low degree of agricultural capitalization, not due to the 'special treatment' towards labor migrants of a certain ethnic minority."
See also
References
- Millward, James A (July 2009). Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang. Columbia University Press. p. 48. ISBN 9780231139250.
- ^ Millward, James A (July 2009). Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang. Columbia University Press. p. 157. ISBN 9780231139250.
- Millward, James A (July 2009). Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang. Columbia University Press. p. 186. ISBN 9780231139250.
- ^ Becqelin, Nicolas (July 2000). "Xinjiang in the Nineties". The China Journal. 44 (44). University of Chicago Press: 65–90. doi:10.2307/2667477. JSTOR 2667477. S2CID 144549708.
- ^ Millward, James A (July 2009). Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang. Columbia University Press. p. 299. ISBN 9780231139250.
- Xinjian Li, Qing He, Yujiang Yuan, and Fenglan Tang "Cold disasters: the most serious meteorological disasters to the cotton production in Xinjiang, China", Proc. SPIE 4890, Ecosystems Dynamics, Ecosystem-Society Interactions, and Remote Sensing Applications for Semi-Arid and Arid Land, (14 July 2003); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.466189 Archived 2021-06-11 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Sautman, Barry (2000). "Is Xinjiang an Internal Colony?". Inner Asia. 2 (2): 239–271. doi:10.1163/146481700793647788. JSTOR 23615559. Archived from the original on 2021-05-10. Retrieved 2021-05-06.
- Mullins, Anna (29 January 2009). "The Past, Present, Future Of Chinese ELS Cotton". www.cottongrower.com. Cotton Grower. Archived from the original on 28 September 2017. Retrieved 3 May 2021.
- Zhao, X., & Tisdell, C. A. (2009). The sustainability of cotton production in China and in Australia: Comparative economic and environmental issues (Working Paper No. 1741-2016-140564). http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.55338 Archived 2021-06-11 at the Wayback Machine
- Cosgrove, Emma. "Uighur labor will be tough to avoid with about 20% of cotton connected to Xinjiang: GlobalData". www.supplychaindive.com. Supply Chain Dive. Archived from the original on 7 April 2021. Retrieved 3 May 2021.
- Zhou, Cissy (16 April 2021). "Xinjiang cotton ban uncertainties weigh on Chinese farmers, smaller textile firms". www.scmp.com. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 3 May 2021. Retrieved 3 May 2021.
- Davidson, Helen (15 December 2020). "Xinjiang: more than half a million forced to pick cotton, report suggests". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2 May 2021. Retrieved 3 May 2021.
- Han, Enze (2024). The Ripple Effect: China's Complex Presence in Southeast Asia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-769659-0.
- Keena, Colm (29 April 2021). "'We don't know if he is alive': Uighur woman speaks out on jailing of father in Xinjiang". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 30 April 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
- Allen-Ebrahimian, Bethany (5 Jan 2021). "The scope of forced labor in Xinjiang is bigger than we knew". Axios. Archived from the original on 3 May 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
- Kriebitz, Alexander; Man, Raphael (22 May 2020). "The Xinjiang Case and Its Implications from a Business Ethics Perspective". Human Rights Review. 21 (3): 243–265. doi:10.1007/s12142-020-00591-0. S2CID 219509907.
- ^ "U.S. to block cotton from Chinese region over Uighur crackdown". NBC News. Associated Press. 14 January 2021. Archived from the original on 3 May 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
- "Congress is moving to block goods made with the forced labour of Uyghurs". The Economist. 9 January 2021. Archived from the original on 4 May 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
- "Why getting to the heart of Xinjiang forced labour claims is so hard". South China Morning Post. 2021-04-25. Archived from the original on 2021-08-27. Retrieved 2021-08-27.
- "Old H&M comment on 'forced labour' in China's Xinjiang raises online storm". Reuters. 2021-03-25. Archived from the original on 2021-03-29. Retrieved 2021-08-27.
- "Xinjiang cotton: Western clothes brands vanish as backlash grows". BBC News. 2021-03-26. Archived from the original on 2021-04-10. Retrieved 2021-08-27.
- "BCI Pulls Out of Xinjiang". 27 March 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-03-27. Retrieved 2021-05-03.
- "Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) Update". Better Cotton Initiative. 21 October 2020. Archived from the original on 2020-11-30. Retrieved 2021-03-26.
- Clark, Evan (2020-10-21). "Better Cotton Initiative Stops Xinjiang Field Activity". WWD. Archived from the original on 2021-03-29. Retrieved 2021-03-29.
- "BCI China Finds No Forced Labor". Reuters. 26 March 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-03-26. Retrieved 2021-05-03.
- Allen-Ebrahimian, Bethany (April 13, 2021). "Xinjiang statement removed from cotton watchdog website". Axios. Archived from the original on April 13, 2021. Retrieved April 14, 2021.
- ^ Horio, Munemasa; Hama, Misa (2 May 2021). "Xinjiang cotton and Myanmar jade show human rights pressure on commodities". Nikkei Asia. Archived from the original on 4 May 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
- ^ Bermingham, Finbarr; Delaney, Robert; Fromer, Jacob (15 September 2020). "US issues restrictions on import of Xinjiang cotton and apparel products, citing forced labour". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
- ^ "China slams U.S. for blocking cotton imports from Xinjiang - Xinhua | English.news.cn". www.xinhuanet.com. Archived from the original on 2021-05-04. Retrieved 2021-05-03.
- "Xinhua Commentary: BCI's cotton boycott against China is hasty and doomed to fail - Xinhua | English.news.cn". www.xinhuanet.com. Archived from the original on 2021-03-30. Retrieved 2021-05-03.
- Datt, Angeli. "The CCP Hand Behind China's Xinjiang Cotton Backlash". thediplomat.com. The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2021.
- Yan, Lim Ruey (26 March 2021). "Over 40 celebrities end ties with fashion companies over Xinjiang cotton allegations". Straits Times. Archived from the original on 29 March 2021. Retrieved 3 May 2021.
- ^ Zhang, Tianwei; Ap, Tiffany; Clark, Evan (2021-03-25). "Xinjiang Cotton: Li Ning, Anta Shares Surge While Nike, Adidas, Burberry Hit With Backlash". WWD. Archived from the original on 2021-03-27. Retrieved 2021-03-28.
- McDonald, Joe (2021-03-25). "China attacks foreign clothing, shoe brands over Xinjiang". AP News. Archived from the original on 2021-03-25. Retrieved 2021-03-26.
- Ben Westcott and Laura He (25 March 2021). "H&M and Nike are facing a boycott in China over Xinjiang cotton statements". CNN. Archived from the original on 2021-04-18. Retrieved 2021-03-28.
- Jordan, Zoe. "Xinjiang Cotton and the Shift in China's Censorship Approach". thediplomat.com. The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 4 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- Xiao, Eva (30 March 2021). "China Used Twitter, Facebook More Than Ever Last Year for Xinjiang Propaganda". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 5 May 2021. Retrieved 6 May 2021.
- "China raises Xinjiang cotton with parent firm for Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger". South China Morning Post. 2024-09-24. Retrieved 2024-09-26.
- ^ "US Responses to China's Crimes Against the Uyghurs". United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. 2021. Archived from the original on 5 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- Waller, James; Salazar Albornoz, Mariana (27 April 2021). "Crime and No Punishment? China's Abuses Against the Uyghurs". Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. 22 (1): 100–111. doi:10.1353/gia.2021.0000. S2CID 235855240. Archived from the original on 25 April 2022. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
- Bain, Marc (13 January 2021). "The US is intensifying its crackdown on forced labor in China's Xinjiang region". Quartz. Archived from the original on 30 April 2021. Retrieved 3 May 2021.
- Bain, Marc. "Clothing made by Chinese forced labor is likely being sold in the US". Quartz. Archived from the original on 2019-12-04. Retrieved 2019-12-04.
- Strong, Matthew (27 March 2021). "Xinjiang cotton is a human rights issue: Taiwan legislative speaker". www.taiwannews.com.tw. Taiwan News. Archived from the original on 5 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- I-chia, Lee (29 March 2021). "Ko weighs in on Xinjiang cotton". www.taipeitimes.com. Taipei Times. Archived from the original on 5 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- SUTHERLAND, EMILY (2 March 2021). "Are you selling China's slave cotton?". www.drapersonline.com. Drapers. Archived from the original on 13 July 2021. Retrieved 13 July 2021.
- Renshaw, Matthew; Hayward, Anthony. "UK companies risk prosecution after National Crime Agency's failure to investigate cotton imports from the Uyghur region is ruled unlawful". Leigh day. Retrieved 5 August 2024.
- "Uyghur group wins appeal over UK investigation into 'slave labour' cotton". Reuters. June 27, 2024. Archived from the original on June 27, 2024. Retrieved July 1, 2024.
- Zhun Xu and Fangfei Lin (9 December 2021). "The Political Economy of US Sanctions against China". Sanctions as War. BRILL. pp. 306–320. doi:10.1163/9789004501201_019. ISBN 9789004501201. S2CID 245392880.
World cotton production | ||
---|---|---|