Revision as of 22:38, 20 April 2007 editAarktica (talk | contribs)4,839 edits →Thanks for the intervention.: good deal.← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:13, 22 April 2007 edit undoMaxwell123~enwiki (talk | contribs)3 edits my link additions to Deadliest Catch that were removedNext edit → | ||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
: to your Talk page. -- ] 22:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | : to your Talk page. -- ] 22:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
:: Thanks for replying so soon. I am glad to help with the chores :-) Cheers. --] 22:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | :: Thanks for replying so soon. I am glad to help with the chores :-) Cheers. --] 22:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
== my link additions to Deadliest Catch that were removed == | |||
Thanks for letting me respond. If you could read this and let me know what you think I'd appreciate it. In response to my connection to the "other" user that added in the link previously...that was me. I had to create another user name and password as I couldnt log on after trying 3 times. However, I wasn't the person who originally created the category "unofficial sites". I've read through the American Idol and Star Trek sites I mentioned and what I see on the Star Trek site is external links that are definitely not official such as a tourism vulcan themed website and another site of fanzines. On the American Idol site, the very last listed website is Vote for the worst.com. I went to that site and it has absolutely nothing to do with American Idol as far as I can see. I can also explain a little bit more of my site (which is the only one I am interested in listing. There were 2 others but they're no relation to mine). | |||
If Thom Beers created a blog or a fansite it would definitely be official but he hasn't...No one has. If this show were as long lasting as Star Trek there might be many official fansites and if it were as popular as American Idol, then there might be multiple "official" sites as well, but there's not. Mine is the only existing fansite that IS unbiased when it comes to Deadliest Catch. It's simply about the show--Deadliest Catch. It is by definition a blog, yet it's designed like a website with multiple pages. There is nothing there I sell or advertise. There are only a few sites listed in wikepedia for this show--the actual individual fishing vessel websites and they only promote and provide information in their own interest, and likewise, the Discovery Channel website also only promotes the show in reference to itself. My site on the other hand, includes many many press releases, photos, tv schedules, topic connected links, and other general information/topics that are connected to Deadliest Catch such as Alaska, the Bering sea, seafood recipes, etc...So if www.deadliestreports.wordpress.com doesn't qualify as an unofficial site or external link, could you possibly add a See Also section? Kind regard, | |||
Maxwell/opilia/Patricia |
Revision as of 12:13, 22 April 2007
Archives |
---|
My "fan"
I know who it is, and at the risk of breaking WP:DENY I made a sock/LTA evidence page at User:Gluestick22 to make it easier to identify the behavior. —dgiesc 22:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Could you please review Tax deductible theatre company real quick and see if it deserves to be deleted? Thank you! Cheers! BlackBear 01:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
username report
Sorry, I thought that religious terms weren't acceptable with the username policy.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. (talk • contribs) 04:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, it looks like Assassinking91 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is clearly inappropriete because of the profanity, but I didn't want to bring it to WP:AIV, because I already made two reports that were removed.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. (talk • contribs) 05:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Theatre Company
Thank you for the response. That's what I thought the response would be, and I'm going to put it up for AfD shortly. Thank you. BlackBear 12:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 03:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notice, and good luck editing. Cheers! BlackBear 13:28, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: Thanks
oh, it was my pleasure. cheers. West Brom 4ever 12:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Question about deleted Vibration traiing article
Hi! I was the editor who placed the speedy deletion tag on the recently created Vibration training article that you later deleted -- which was a good decision, IMHO. However, due to a recent semi-conversation with the creator of the article (see , , and ), I think I need to review my original decision to place a speedy deletion tag on the article -- not that I think that I was wrong to do so, but so that I can be sure about my thinining process, and, to be honest, I don't remember the article too well. Would it be somehow possible to (temporarily) get access to the article that was deleted, perhaps putting it in my userspace, just so I can take a look at it? Should I be approaching you about this? Anyway, thank you for your time, and thanks for serving as an administrator. -- ArglebargleIV 02:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- OK, thanks -- I just started to get a bit worried about what I did. -- ArglebargleIV 04:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Random Smiley Award
For your contributions to Misplaced Pages and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Awardoriginated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)
♠TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 20:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Check Out Something
Can you check out List of Cars characters? A user, User:TTN has taken the initiative of deleting large portions of text from that and various pages. While his reasons seem to be good, he's deleting GIANT portions, without bringing it up first on the talk pages.
At this point he's technically done several 3RRs and a violation of deleting significant portions of pages without bringing it up on the talk pages. Can you handle it? >_> -WarthogDemon 04:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
:´- (((
No please! don't block me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jsadfja (talk • contribs) 17:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC). ??? Why??? User:Sandbot--Jsadfja 18:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)--Jsadfja 18:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 22:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
WP:AIV
Could you check WP:AIV real quick? It is getting backed up pretty badly. Cool Blue 00:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry to interrupt you like that, but it's been backed up for over an hour. I've put three or four people on. Thanks! Cool Blue 00:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
FYI
User:Nikky88 is trying to contact you on his talk page. I'm attempting to deal with the issue myself, but you may wish to take a look. Oldelpaso 10:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 23:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
WRS Recovery
Hello GoD, Seriously - I don't get the problem with the links. I have had hundreds of hits since I added them and not one single complaint. The site isn't commercial, its just free advice, with lots of other useful & relevant links. It is useful to all people with WRS and it was linked to relevant sites only.
I gave it a day or so to try & digest Wiki's voluminous 'rules' and in the end I don't understand the fundamental objection to someone with WRS reaching out to help inform others who wish to learn about a cure through using WIKI.
I don't run the WRS site as it happens. I hope that you have acted in haste and that you will reconsider these actions in a more sympathetic fashion.
Could you tell me what the bracketed + or- numbers in green or red are on the 'My Watchlist' reports?
Regards Rosser 12:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 22:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Cheesebot
Please, Cheesebot is not nonsense. It is a formidible and tangible thing, can you please not delete this page again? I don't believe you are the authority in human experience in a position to deem other people's political and personal movements as "nonsense." I appreciate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sublimeirie (talk • contribs)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 22:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Cheesebot
It's back.... 4th time today. Neil916 (Talk) 22:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Deleted. I left the user a note. -- Gogo Dodo 22:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- ...and it's back again. Neil916 (Talk) 22:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted again. It's not coming back. Well, I suppose it could, but WP:BEANS... -- Gogo Dodo 22:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Just saying thank you for being vigilant and dealing with the vandal. Hopefully he doesn't return. Ciao. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epf (talk • contribs)
- You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo 07:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Dear Gogo
Dear Gogo, it is never to late for a beautiful word |
Thanks for the intervention.
Thanks for blocking 71.145.159.68. Is there a way to editors to temporarily block IPs? I found it difficult reverting the user's edits while crafting a 3RR notice. --Aarktica 22:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 22:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for replying so soon. I am glad to help with the chores :-) Cheers. --Aarktica 22:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
my link additions to Deadliest Catch that were removed
Thanks for letting me respond. If you could read this and let me know what you think I'd appreciate it. In response to my connection to the "other" user that added in the link previously...that was me. I had to create another user name and password as I couldnt log on after trying 3 times. However, I wasn't the person who originally created the category "unofficial sites". I've read through the American Idol and Star Trek sites I mentioned and what I see on the Star Trek site is external links that are definitely not official such as a tourism vulcan themed website and another site of fanzines. On the American Idol site, the very last listed website is Vote for the worst.com. I went to that site and it has absolutely nothing to do with American Idol as far as I can see. I can also explain a little bit more of my site (which is the only one I am interested in listing. There were 2 others but they're no relation to mine).
If Thom Beers created a blog or a fansite it would definitely be official but he hasn't...No one has. If this show were as long lasting as Star Trek there might be many official fansites and if it were as popular as American Idol, then there might be multiple "official" sites as well, but there's not. Mine is the only existing fansite that IS unbiased when it comes to Deadliest Catch. It's simply about the show--Deadliest Catch. It is by definition a blog, yet it's designed like a website with multiple pages. There is nothing there I sell or advertise. There are only a few sites listed in wikepedia for this show--the actual individual fishing vessel websites and they only promote and provide information in their own interest, and likewise, the Discovery Channel website also only promotes the show in reference to itself. My site on the other hand, includes many many press releases, photos, tv schedules, topic connected links, and other general information/topics that are connected to Deadliest Catch such as Alaska, the Bering sea, seafood recipes, etc...So if www.deadliestreports.wordpress.com doesn't qualify as an unofficial site or external link, could you possibly add a See Also section? Kind regard,
Maxwell/opilia/Patricia