Talk:List of paraphilias: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:54, 10 October 2021 editCrossroads (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers21,514 editsm →Pictophilia: fix← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 18:03, 2 October 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,800 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:List of paraphilias/Archive 3) (bot
(45 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 8:		Line 8:
	}}		}}
	{{talkheader}}		{{talkheader}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=List\|1=
	{{WikiProjectBannerShell\|1=
	{{WP ~~Sexuality~~ ~~\|class=List~~ \|importance=high}}		{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality\|importance=high}}
	{{WikiProject Psychology ~~\|class=List~~ \|importance=Mid }}		{{WikiProject Psychology \|importance=Mid }}
	{{WP Lists\|class=list\|importance=low}}		{{WikiProject Lists\|class=list\|importance=low}}
	{{WikiProject Medicine~~\|class=list~~\|importance=low\|psychiatry=yes\|psychiatry-imp=}}		{{WikiProject Medicine\|importance=low\|psychiatry=yes\|psychiatry-imp=}}
	}}		}}
	{{archivebox\|auto=yes\|search=yes}}		{{archivebox\|auto=yes\|search=yes}}
Line 25:		Line 25:
	<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->		<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

	== ~~Hypnosis~~ as a paraphilia ==		== Fictophilia is not considered a paraphilia, according to the source cited. ==

			The source does not specify that fictoromanticism or fictophilia is considered a psychological paraphilia. In fact, it states that it is currently not listed as one of these, and that not enough is known to consider it one. This entry should be removed from the list of paraphilias.
	Here is a recent essay by Distinguished Psychology professor ] describing unusual sexual arousal from hypnosis as a paraphilia <ref name=griffiths>{{cite web \|url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-excess/201612/hypnosis-and-sexual-health \|title=Hypnosis And Sexual Health \|last=Griffiths \|first=Mark D. \|date=2016-12-14 \|website=] \|publisher= \|access-date=2020-02-10 \|quote=}}</ref>. It does not appear in the DSM-5 as a paraphilia, but there are a number of case studies in the psychiatric literature that establish the existence of individuals with "experience of intense sexual arousal" to atypical fantasies about hypnosis, e.g.: <ref name=merrill>{{cite journal \|last1=Merrill \|first1=George G. \|last2= \|first2= \|date=1957 \|title=Sexual complications of hypnosis \|url= \|journal=Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis \|volume=5 \|issue=3 \|pages=138-146 \|doi=10.1080/00207145708410731 \|access-date= }}</ref>
	{{Quote
	\|text=To many hypnotic subjects, hypnosis has strong sexual connotations. Freud ( 2 ) recognized this and mentioned the similarity between the states of hypnosis and of being in love. Sciiilder and Kanders(3) stress the erotic aspects of hypnosis and warn that sexual accusations may be made against the therapist. Speyer and Stokvis(4) studied the sexual fantasies of the hypnotic subject, and emphasized the importance of the subject’s erotic attitudes toward the therapist. Lorand(5) pointed out the subject’s unconscious desire for seduction by the hypnotist and correlated hypnotizability with yielding to the one from whom love was expected. Wolberg(6) also mentions the sexual attitude toward hypnosis in patients who have strong unconscious sexual needs. Kline(7) describes some types of sexual reactions during hypnotherapy and discusses their nature.}}

			Source text:
	In a 2017 study, 4% of women in one group freely reported "Sex while drugged/mind control/hypnosis" as a fantasy
			"Second, the present intention is not to propose fictophilia as a problem or a disorder. At the time of writing, fictophilia is not recognized or proposed as a specific diagnostic condition by the World Health Organization (ICD-11) or the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-5) (but see ‘paraphilia’ in both manuals). Our findings do not indicate a need to change the current state of affairs. ] (]) 20:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
	<ref name=yule>{{cite journal \|last1=Yule \|first1=Morag A. \|last2=Brotto \|first2=Lori A. \|last3=Gorzalka \|first3=Boris B. \|date=2017 \|title=Sexual Fantasy and Masturbation Among Asexual Individuals: An In-Depth Exploration \|url= \|journal=Archives of Sexual Behavior \|volume=46 \|issue= \|pages=311–328 \|doi=10.1007/s10508-016-0870-8 \|access-date= }}</ref>

			== Transvestophilia ==
	It could also be considered a sexual fetish, but ''paraphilia'' is an even better fit since the focus is not on a specific object but rather an activity or a set of fantasy scenarios, much like ], ], or ]. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>

			The description for it shouldn't be "A cross-dressing partner", considering it redirects to "Attraction to transgender people". Cross-dressing doesnt make you trans. I think that either this should have the description changed, or make a new section thing for it ] (]) 01:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
	:Those sources are not ]-compliant. Griffiths's commentary is only good enough to relay it as something he thinks, but it still doesn't belong in this article. And we shouldn't be using sources that don't explicitly identify the matter as a paraphilia. Nor should we be using very old sources, such as those from 1957, for this list. And considering all of this, the ] article needs work. I was correct to the content. ] (]) 21:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

			== Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2024 ==
	:And looking for academic sources on the topic of erotic hypnosis, it seems that the article should not even exist because the topic is not ]. ] (]) 22:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

			{{Edit semi-protected\|List of paraphilias\|answered=yes}}
	:: From what I'm hearing, it's important that unusual sexual interests be explicitly labelled a "paraphilia" in a medical text before they should appear on this list, and I have not found such a citation.
			According to the alphabetical style of this list, underneath the existing entry for "sophophilia" and above the entry for "sthenolagnia" I request the addition of "splanchnophilia." The definition of this word is "a sexual arousal in response to viscera and internal organs." While this paraphilia is very uncommon, it does exist, and was used by forensic psychiatrist "Dr. Park Dietz" in reference to Jeffrey Dahmer. ] (]) 19:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
			:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 20:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
			::https://journals.charlotte.edu/urj/article/view/1096/1155
			:: ] (]) 01:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

			== Spectrophilia ==
	:: Very much agreed that ] is in a poor state at the moment. Thank you for pointing out that it should have evidence of significant independent coverage. I have added a number of those citations in the Talk page for now, but I will be using their contents to fill in the article. ] (]) 06:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
	____

			Why isn't ] in the list? ] (]) 23:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
	{{reflist-talk}}

	== more philias part 2 ==

	* here is another list I found https://blogjob.com/lifeandliving/2014/08/24/list-of-fetishes/ <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	* here is another list I found https://thoughtcatalog.com/sylvie-quinn/2018/05/sexual-fetishes/ <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	here is another list I found https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sexual-fetish_n_4144418 <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:Those are poor sources. See ]. Also, you should learn to sign your comments. And you shouldn't start new sections for every little comment in rapid fire, so I've combined them. <span style="font-family:Palatino">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 21:16, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
	The term alphamegamia can be used when a person is sexually aroused by partners of a different age group, and "chronophilia" can describe a sexual fixation on members of a different age group. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	== "Transvestophila" name change ==

	I have no clue where the name "Transvestophilia" came from, but Transgender people are not Transvestites, so the term to describe fetishism towards Transgender people should be something more along the lines of "Transgendophilia" <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	== Pictophilia ==

	It is medical folklore from bygone days. Diagnosing someone with pictophilia is malpractice. Otherwise ] that about three quarters of US men feeling sexual needs are paraphiles, and so it is the majority of US population which feels sexual needs. In such light, pictophilia is a laughable diagnosis.

	What about negative effects or being addicted? ] has never been shown to exist. And the obsessive compulsive diagnosis makes it redundant.

	DSM-5 code for pornography use? Not any. ICD-10 code for pornography use? Not any. ICD-11 code for pornography use? Not any. So, of course it isn't paraphilia. There is a code for OCD, there is none for pictophilia.

	On page 705 of DSM-5, pictophilia would have been the most obvious paraphilia to mention, but it did not get mentioned.

	That would have solved the whole dispute about the existence of the porn addiction. There is no consensus that porn addiction exists. ] (]) 15:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
	:A lot of these aren't mentioned by name in the DSM, to my knowledge. That can still be named as paraphilias in the scientific literature, even if not a specific diagnosis. And even though some attractions are very common, an extreme, paraphilic version can still exist. We list mazophilia even though heterosexual men typically find breasts attractive, for example. You need to cite sources specifically about pictophilia to change that text. <span style="font-family:Palatino">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 04:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:03, 2 October 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of paraphilias article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months

This article is rated List-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sexology and sexuality High‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Misplaced Pages. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force.

Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

A revert I'm unhappy with

I added the following at the outset: Recently-coined names for paraphilias (abasiophilia, algolagnia, etc.) typically have a Greek origin.

This was reverted by EvergreenFir because it was not documented.

Documentation is not required for items easily verifiable. Anyone who goes to a dictionary can see these terms are coined from Greek. Is a source saying so really required?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Deisenbe (talk • contribs)

Fictophilia is not considered a paraphilia, according to the source cited.

The source does not specify that fictoromanticism or fictophilia is considered a psychological paraphilia. In fact, it states that it is currently not listed as one of these, and that not enough is known to consider it one. This entry should be removed from the list of paraphilias.

Source text: "Second, the present intention is not to propose fictophilia as a problem or a disorder. At the time of writing, fictophilia is not recognized or proposed as a specific diagnostic condition by the World Health Organization (ICD-11) or the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-5) (but see ‘paraphilia’ in both manuals). Our findings do not indicate a need to change the current state of affairs. GrilledSoup (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Transvestophilia

The description for it shouldn't be "A cross-dressing partner", considering it redirects to "Attraction to transgender people". Cross-dressing doesnt make you trans. I think that either this should have the description changed, or make a new section thing for it Smirkjuice (talk) 01:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

According to the alphabetical style of this list, underneath the existing entry for "sophophilia" and above the entry for "sthenolagnia" I request the addition of "splanchnophilia." The definition of this word is "a sexual arousal in response to viscera and internal organs." While this paraphilia is very uncommon, it does exist, and was used by forensic psychiatrist "Dr. Park Dietz" in reference to Jeffrey Dahmer. Kibblecat (talk) 19:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jamedeus (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

https://journals.charlotte.edu/urj/article/view/1096/1155

https://www.zimbardo.com/splanchnophilia-psychology-definition-history-examples/#:~:text=Splanchnophilia%20is%20a%20psychological%20condition,another%20person's%20internal%20bodily%20structures. Kibblecat (talk) 01:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Spectrophilia

Why isn't spectrophilia in the list? 2601:282:1C02:5700:0:0:0:D488 (talk) 23:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Categories: