Misplaced Pages

Talk:List of paraphilias: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:57, 15 January 2019 editJMGN (talk | contribs)487 edits →Sapiosexual: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:03, 2 October 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,198 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:List of paraphilias/Archive 3) (bot 
(97 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
}} }}
{{talkheader}} {{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Psychology |class=List |importance=Mid }} {{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=high}}
{{WP Sexuality |class=List |importance=top }} {{WikiProject Psychology |importance=Mid }}
{{WP Lists|class=|importance=}} {{WikiProject Lists|class=list|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=low|psychiatry=yes|psychiatry-imp=}}
}} }}
{{archivebox|auto=yes|search=yes}} {{archivebox|auto=yes|search=yes}}
Line 24: Line 25:
<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->


== Fictophilia is not considered a paraphilia, according to the source cited. ==
== Microphilia ==


The source does not specify that fictoromanticism or fictophilia is considered a psychological paraphilia. In fact, it states that it is currently not listed as one of these, and that not enough is known to consider it one. This entry should be removed from the list of paraphilias.
], regarding and , what makes you think that drmarkgriffiths source from ] passes ]? It does not. In fact, it does not even pass ]. You stated, "''As it is an infrequent fetish, it is difficult to find direct academic studies pertaining to it.''" That should tell you something. Furthermore, as made clear at the ] article, women fantasizing about being sexual with giants is rare. Macrophilia is rare and doesn't have much in the way of academic sources either. Do stop adding microphilia to the list. ] (]) 16:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
:]. I apologize for the inconvenience. I followed up by searching my school's academic database, and could not locate any recent and reliable academic studies pertaining to Microphilia. I will not attempt to add the entry again. ] (]) 17:31, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
::], thank you. ] (]) 18:08, 16 December 2017 (UTC)


Source text:
== I can't find a name for this one ==
"Second, the present intention is not to propose fictophilia as a problem or a disorder. At the time of writing, fictophilia is not recognized or proposed as a specific diagnostic condition by the World Health Organization (ICD-11) or the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-5) (but see ‘paraphilia’ in both manuals). Our findings do not indicate a need to change the current state of affairs. ] (]) 20:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


== Transvestophilia ==
How would you call the fetish involving striped clothes? (not "stripper" related, I mean keeping the clothes on and these clothes have say, black and white stripes). It would be easier to find a partner if I could google this by its name if the name exists of course. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


The description for it shouldn't be "A cross-dressing partner", considering it redirects to "Attraction to transgender people". Cross-dressing doesnt make you trans. I think that either this should have the description changed, or make a new section thing for it ] (]) 01:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
==Sourcing==
], regarding , we go by what the reliable source state. And ] usually is not considered a ]. Notice that ephebophilia includes physical/legal adults in addition to those 15 and up? Read the sourced Ephebophilia article. It would have made more sense if you'd listed ], but, as the Hebephilia article makes clear, even hebephilia is debated as a paraphilia and mental disorder. ] (]) 05:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2024 ==
I see you did include hebephilia, but, as indicated by what I stated above, it's not on the list for a reason. I suppose we could include a note about the debate surrounding it, like (I think) we did before, but still. ] (]) 05:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)


{{Edit semi-protected|List of paraphilias|answered=yes}}
== ] ==
According to the alphabetical style of this list, underneath the existing entry for "sophophilia" and above the entry for "sthenolagnia" I request the addition of "splanchnophilia." The definition of this word is "a sexual arousal in response to viscera and internal organs." While this paraphilia is very uncommon, it does exist, and was used by forensic psychiatrist "Dr. Park Dietz" in reference to Jeffrey Dahmer. ] (]) 19:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 20:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
::https://journals.charlotte.edu/urj/article/view/1096/1155
:: ] (]) 01:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)


== Spectrophilia ==
], regarding , see ]. That is why I reverted you. Do not add poor sources, including poor medical sources, to the article. ] (]) 04:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)


Why isn't ] in the list? ] (]) 23:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
:], no problem, I figured it out. I went back and looked for other sources. However, I am noticing that others on the list are using sources such as articles from The Guardian (Oculophilia). I also noticed one did not leave a source but did link another Misplaced Pages article (Pyrophilia), is this sufficient? ] (]) 05:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
::], I again. It doesn't seem that you took the time to read WP:MEDRS; for example, what it states about ]. I'll leave a note at the ] talk page about this so that editors there might weigh in. ] (]) 05:27, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
:::] I'm a little bit confused, I looked at the ] page. Both of those sources I used were found in published journals, and were listed as peer-reviewed, so not original research. What about the item that sources an article from The Guardian only? Is there a reason why this piece is ok and these journal articles were not? ] (]) 05:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
::::], ] is not the same thing as ]. See what WP:MEDRS states about primary sources, secondary sources and literature reviews. Also, I don't work in "what about" terms. If something on the list is only sourced to '']'', then remove it. ] (]) 05:39, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::], I understand, it wasn't intended to redirect the conversation, it was only brought up because I was wondering if there was a reason why this was ok. I will remove it then. ] (]) 05:44, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

== Sapiosexual ==

"Arousal by the intelligence of other people" --] (]) 12:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:03, 2 October 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of paraphilias article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
This article is rated List-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPsychology Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLists Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Misplaced Pages. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMedicine: Psychiatry Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force.
Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3


This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

A revert I'm unhappy with

I added the following at the outset: Recently-coined names for paraphilias (abasiophilia, algolagnia, etc.) typically have a Greek origin.

This was reverted by EvergreenFir because it was not documented.

Documentation is not required for items easily verifiable. Anyone who goes to a dictionary can see these terms are coined from Greek. Is a source saying so really required?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Deisenbe (talk • contribs)

Fictophilia is not considered a paraphilia, according to the source cited.

The source does not specify that fictoromanticism or fictophilia is considered a psychological paraphilia. In fact, it states that it is currently not listed as one of these, and that not enough is known to consider it one. This entry should be removed from the list of paraphilias.

Source text: "Second, the present intention is not to propose fictophilia as a problem or a disorder. At the time of writing, fictophilia is not recognized or proposed as a specific diagnostic condition by the World Health Organization (ICD-11) or the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-5) (but see ‘paraphilia’ in both manuals). Our findings do not indicate a need to change the current state of affairs. GrilledSoup (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Transvestophilia

The description for it shouldn't be "A cross-dressing partner", considering it redirects to "Attraction to transgender people". Cross-dressing doesnt make you trans. I think that either this should have the description changed, or make a new section thing for it Smirkjuice (talk) 01:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

According to the alphabetical style of this list, underneath the existing entry for "sophophilia" and above the entry for "sthenolagnia" I request the addition of "splanchnophilia." The definition of this word is "a sexual arousal in response to viscera and internal organs." While this paraphilia is very uncommon, it does exist, and was used by forensic psychiatrist "Dr. Park Dietz" in reference to Jeffrey Dahmer. Kibblecat (talk) 19:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jamedeus (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
https://journals.charlotte.edu/urj/article/view/1096/1155
https://www.zimbardo.com/splanchnophilia-psychology-definition-history-examples/#:~:text=Splanchnophilia%20is%20a%20psychological%20condition,another%20person's%20internal%20bodily%20structures. Kibblecat (talk) 01:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Spectrophilia

Why isn't spectrophilia in the list? 2601:282:1C02:5700:0:0:0:D488 (talk) 23:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Categories: