Revision as of 12:51, 11 October 2020 editHulmem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,293 edits →Legacy: reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:58, 8 October 2024 edit undoCenterone (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,733 editsm →Categorize under Films about time travel: adding a bracket to my own comment | ||
(51 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Talk header}} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Film|American-task-force |
{{WikiProject Film|American-task-force=yes}} | ||
{{WikiProject Science Fiction |
{{WikiProject Science Fiction|importance=Low}} | ||
{{WikiProject Comedy |
{{WikiProject Comedy|importance=Mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject 20th Century Studios |importance=Low}} | |||
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|USfilm=yes|USfilm-importance=low}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{To do}} | {{To do}} | ||
{{Find sources notice}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| algo = old(90d) | | algo = old(90d) | ||
| archive = Talk:Idiocracy/Archive %(counter |
| archive = Talk:Idiocracy/Archive %(counter | ||
Water )d | |||
| counter = 2 | | counter = 2 | ||
| maxarchivesize = 150K | | maxarchivesize = 150K | ||
Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
| minthreadsleft = 2 | | minthreadsleft = 2 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Auto archiving notice|=Lowercase sigmabot III|age= |units= 90 days}} | |||
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion == | |||
== Political Bias == | |||
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: | |||
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2022-12-12T18:22:37.961162 | Idiocracy (30639266695).jpg --> | |||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 18:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Should be protected? == | |||
The section of Commentary seems to state in a factual manner that Trump's policies mirror ineffective and unintellectual themes of Idiocracy, rather than clarifying that that is what the article in question is making claim to. I believe this needs to be reworded to accurately reflect it is an opinion, not factual, in order to follow Misplaced Pages's guidelines on neutrality. ] (]) 02:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
Reverted a defacement claiming it was a 'documentary'. How do I propose locking a page? ] (]) 20:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
: I'd say it is pretty cautiously worded already "others expressed opinions". I edited the bit about the Salon.com article to make it more neutral since the author of that article was warning the left against making simplistic comparisons that would alienate people, so that should be providing a counterpoint but perhaps it needs to rephrased again to make it clearer. Maybe the article should explain that Trump is in the ] (and incidentally ] is not). | |||
: I can understand that because the section includes many left wing opinions it might seem biased but I do think it is accurately presenting those left wing opinions in a fair way. | |||
: What if any specific changes to the wording would you suggest? -- ] (]) 00:25, 8 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
:: I made an attempt to remove a bit of bias from the "Legacy" section and renamed it to better fit the content. Feel free to let me know or change it if you disagree, but I think it retains its meaning without being overtly controversial. {<sub>]</sub> <span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;">]</span><sup>]</sup>} 05:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
::: I restored the ] before I saw this comment. I think the recent repeated vandalism doesn't deserve the level of consideration you've shown. The wording "wrestler turned president" was not unintentional, it was quite deliberate. Donald Trump was inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame in 2003. This topic didn't get just a few articles, it was covered in Time magazine. and many others. If anything the section is too restrained and doesn't offer half enough explanation, analysis, and emphasis, for the amount of coverage it has received. Also I wouldn't limit the Legacy section to Trump. It has been a big deal but it has hardly been the only time people have compared the state of society to the film Idiocracy. | |||
::: Trump voters are gonna Trump. Misplaced Pages editors should do what is best for this article even if it means having to revert and be vigilant. -- ] (]) 04:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::: That seems fair. If the community here agrees that the section is acceptable, which seems to be the case, I am happy to continue reverting the vandals. Thanks! <span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;">]</span> 14:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:] is over thataway, but FWIW when I look at the edit history I'm not seeing a very strong case for protecting it at this time. Cheers. ] (]) 02:58, 3 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Table to prose == | |||
== Character list == | |||
I'm just going to note here that the article would be greatly improved by changing the table in the Box office section to ]. I'm not ready to do it myself yet, and I don't want to slap a big ugly ] tag on it, so I mention it here in case anyone is feeling enthusiastic and might do it before I eventually get around to it. -- ] (]) 13:45, 8 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
Why do the characters' descriptions describe their positions at the end of the movie? ] (]) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Legacy == | |||
== Categorize under Films about time travel == | |||
The whole Legacy section is leftist gibberish and a good example of the POV problem that plagues Misplaced Pages. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
While there is no ''actual'' time travel in Idiocracy, it is an important part of the plot and a prevalent theme of the film. The phrase "time machine" is currently used in the article four times. | |||
: You can have your own opinions but you can't have your own facts. The fact is it happened, many leftist commentators and the director and writer of the film made comparisons between this film and Trump and this was all reported in ] publications. Take a look at ] and enjoy the Trump references in that article instead. -- ] (]) 04:43, 11 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
Given that ] is described as listing "the titles of films that include the theme of time travel," Idiocracy belongs in the category. ] (]) 14:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:It's difficult for me to believe that that category is intended to include films in which no time travel occurs. That said, are there other films within that category that feature no time travel? ] (]) 17:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
:So yes, it is a "fact" that some Hollywood people and leftist commentators have political opinions. This is a common journalistic technique in use today—reporting someone's political narrative (i.e., opinion) and claiming it as a fact in the sense that the person actually said it. Is it really surprising or notable that leftist commentators and the director and writer of the film (i.e., Hollywood types) made comparisons between this film and Trump? I don't think so. IMHO, the Legacy section is merely promoting a political narrative that Trump and his supporters are idiots, and I don't think the section is appropriate for this Misplaced Pages article. —] (]) 12:51, 11 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
::I don't know if there are others in the list that don't include time travel (or only include suspended animation). But I don't see how that should exclude a film from a list, given that the list is described as "This category lists the titles of films that include the theme of time travel." If that description is inadequate, and the category should only include films in which time travel occurs, then maybe the description should be revised. Though, of course, then we'd really want to be sure that there are no others on the list, and that's not really the subject to discus here. | |||
::I just wanted to mention that Idiocracy takes the #2 spot on . | |||
::It also makes top 10 in a poll of . That's user generated, but shows that many people think of Idiocracy as a time travel movie. | |||
::And it's #9 in . ] (]) 03:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::If another reasonably experienced editor chimes in supporting the inclusion of the category (you're welcome to consider asking at ], I won't push back against it, but until that time I maintain that time travel isn't so much a theme of the film as it is a plot device used to get to the point in time that the majority of the plot focuses upon. ] (]) 05:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I'll try asking there. But just to clarify for anyone else reading this, my argument is not that it should be included because time travel (actually, suspended animation) is a "plot device used to get to the point in time." If that were all, I would agree that it's not a time travel movie. It's because once they're in the future, they spend a majority of the film on an adventure trying to go back in time. ] (]) 13:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::FWIW, I agree with you that the underlying issue may be that the category itself needs clarification. But I see we're now discussing at ] (though it might have been better to link to this discussion), and will continue the discussion there. ] (]) 16:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::I guess the question is... is sleeping really time travel? Is the story of Rip Van Winkle time travel? Is the story of Sleeping Beauty time travel? Futurama... is kind of borderline, as Fry sleeps due to a cryogenic accident (later ] to have been intentionally caused by an alien, Nibbler, who knew they needed Fry in the future to prevent destruction), but also because in it the professor actually invents real time travel. My initial feeling is that Idiocracy isn't really a time travel film, especially as the time travel isn't intentional -- it was only supposed to be a short-term experiment.. waking up in the distant future is due to a comedy of errors and neglect. ] (]) 19:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Again, I don't think the suspended animation is what makes Idiocracy a time travel film. As I said above: | |||
:::::::"But just to clarify for anyone else reading this, my argument is not that it should be included because time travel (actually, suspended animation) is a "plot device used to get to the point in time." If that were all, I would agree that it's not a time travel movie. ''It's because once they're in the future, they spend a majority of the film on an adventure trying to go back in time.''" ] (]) 20:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:58, 8 October 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Idiocracy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Idiocracy: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2007-04-12
|
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Should be protected?
Reverted a defacement claiming it was a 'documentary'. How do I propose locking a page? Fredirc (talk) 20:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- WP:RFPP is over thataway, but FWIW when I look at the edit history I'm not seeing a very strong case for protecting it at this time. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 02:58, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Character list
Why do the characters' descriptions describe their positions at the end of the movie? Daytman (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Categorize under Films about time travel
While there is no actual time travel in Idiocracy, it is an important part of the plot and a prevalent theme of the film. The phrase "time machine" is currently used in the article four times. Given that Category:Films about time travel is described as listing "the titles of films that include the theme of time travel," Idiocracy belongs in the category. FriendlyPedant (talk) 14:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's difficult for me to believe that that category is intended to include films in which no time travel occurs. That said, are there other films within that category that feature no time travel? DonIago (talk) 17:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know if there are others in the list that don't include time travel (or only include suspended animation). But I don't see how that should exclude a film from a list, given that the list is described as "This category lists the titles of films that include the theme of time travel." If that description is inadequate, and the category should only include films in which time travel occurs, then maybe the description should be revised. Though, of course, then we'd really want to be sure that there are no others on the list, and that's not really the subject to discus here.
- I just wanted to mention that Idiocracy takes the #2 spot on The Guardian's 2023 top 20 list of time travel movies.
- It also makes top 10 in a poll of time travel comedies on IMDB. That's user generated, but shows that many people think of Idiocracy as a time travel movie.
- And it's #9 in Screen Rant's 2023 top 15 time travel movies list. FriendlyPedant (talk) 03:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- If another reasonably experienced editor chimes in supporting the inclusion of the category (you're welcome to consider asking at WT:FILM, I won't push back against it, but until that time I maintain that time travel isn't so much a theme of the film as it is a plot device used to get to the point in time that the majority of the plot focuses upon. DonIago (talk) 05:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'll try asking there. But just to clarify for anyone else reading this, my argument is not that it should be included because time travel (actually, suspended animation) is a "plot device used to get to the point in time." If that were all, I would agree that it's not a time travel movie. It's because once they're in the future, they spend a majority of the film on an adventure trying to go back in time. FriendlyPedant (talk) 13:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- FWIW, I agree with you that the underlying issue may be that the category itself needs clarification. But I see we're now discussing at WT:FILM (though it might have been better to link to this discussion), and will continue the discussion there. DonIago (talk) 16:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I guess the question is... is sleeping really time travel? Is the story of Rip Van Winkle time travel? Is the story of Sleeping Beauty time travel? Futurama... is kind of borderline, as Fry sleeps due to a cryogenic accident (later retconned to have been intentionally caused by an alien, Nibbler, who knew they needed Fry in the future to prevent destruction), but also because in it the professor actually invents real time travel. My initial feeling is that Idiocracy isn't really a time travel film, especially as the time travel isn't intentional -- it was only supposed to be a short-term experiment.. waking up in the distant future is due to a comedy of errors and neglect. Centerone (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Again, I don't think the suspended animation is what makes Idiocracy a time travel film. As I said above:
- "But just to clarify for anyone else reading this, my argument is not that it should be included because time travel (actually, suspended animation) is a "plot device used to get to the point in time." If that were all, I would agree that it's not a time travel movie. It's because once they're in the future, they spend a majority of the film on an adventure trying to go back in time." FriendlyPedant (talk) 20:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I guess the question is... is sleeping really time travel? Is the story of Rip Van Winkle time travel? Is the story of Sleeping Beauty time travel? Futurama... is kind of borderline, as Fry sleeps due to a cryogenic accident (later retconned to have been intentionally caused by an alien, Nibbler, who knew they needed Fry in the future to prevent destruction), but also because in it the professor actually invents real time travel. My initial feeling is that Idiocracy isn't really a time travel film, especially as the time travel isn't intentional -- it was only supposed to be a short-term experiment.. waking up in the distant future is due to a comedy of errors and neglect. Centerone (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- FWIW, I agree with you that the underlying issue may be that the category itself needs clarification. But I see we're now discussing at WT:FILM (though it might have been better to link to this discussion), and will continue the discussion there. DonIago (talk) 16:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'll try asking there. But just to clarify for anyone else reading this, my argument is not that it should be included because time travel (actually, suspended animation) is a "plot device used to get to the point in time." If that were all, I would agree that it's not a time travel movie. It's because once they're in the future, they spend a majority of the film on an adventure trying to go back in time. FriendlyPedant (talk) 13:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- If another reasonably experienced editor chimes in supporting the inclusion of the category (you're welcome to consider asking at WT:FILM, I won't push back against it, but until that time I maintain that time travel isn't so much a theme of the film as it is a plot device used to get to the point in time that the majority of the plot focuses upon. DonIago (talk) 05:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class film articles
- B-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- B-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- B-Class Comedy articles
- Mid-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- B-Class 20th Century Studios articles
- Low-importance 20th Century Studios articles
- B-Class 20th Century Studios articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject 20th Century Studios articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance American cinema articles
- American cinema articles with to-do lists
- WikiProject United States articles
- Misplaced Pages pages with to-do lists