Talk:Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 15:22, 10 October 2022 editAnubisIbizu (talk \| contribs)434 edits →Military spouse: ReplyTag: Reply ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 10:40, 9 October 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk \| contribs)Bots1,372,816 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Ruth Bader Ginsburg/Archive 1. (BOT)
(63 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Skip to talk}}		{{Skip to talk}}
		⚫	{{Talk header\|search=yes\|disclaimer=yes\|bottom=yes}}
	{{American English}}		{{American English}}
⚫	{{Talk header\|search=yes\|disclaimer=yes\|bottom=yes}}
	{{WikiProject banner shell\|1=
	{{WikiProject Biography\|living=no\|class=GA\|listas=Ginsburg, Ruth Bader\|politician-work-group=yes\|politician-priority=high}}
⚫	{{WikiProject Law~~\|class=GA~~\|importance=high}}
⚫	{{WikiProject New York (state)~~\|class=GA~~\|importance=Low\|Columbia=yes\|Columbia-importance=Low}}
⚫	{{WikiProject New York City~~\|class=GA~~\|importance=Low}}
⚫	{{WikiProject United States courts and judges~~\|class=GA~~\|importance=High}}
⚫	{{WikiProject Jewish Women~~\|class=GA~~\|importance=low}}
⚫	}}
	{{Vital article\|level=5\|topic=People\|subpage=Jurists\|class=GA}}
	{{Article history		{{Article history
	\|action1=GAN		\|action1=GAN
Line 32:		Line 23:
	\|topic=law		\|topic=law

			\|itn1date=19 September 2020
	\|otd1date=2017-03-15
	\|otd1oldid=770364934		\|otd1date=2017-03-15\|otd1oldid=770364934
			\|otd2date=2024-03-15\|otd2oldid=1213780627
		⚫	}}

			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=GA\|vital=yes\|living=no\|listas=Ginsburg, Ruth Bader\|1=
			{{WikiProject Biography\|politician-work-group=yes\|politician-priority=high\|s&a-work-group=yes\|s&a-priority=}}
		⚫	{{WikiProject Law\|importance=high}}
		⚫	{{WikiProject New York (state)\|importance=Low\|Columbia=yes\|Columbia-importance=Low}}
		⚫	{{WikiProject New York City\|importance=Low}}
		⚫	{{WikiProject United States courts and judges\|importance=High}}
		⚫	{{WikiProject Jewish Women\|importance=low}}
			{{WikiProject Women writers\|importance=high}}
	}}		}}
	{{ITN talk\|19 September\|2020\|oldid=979131704}}
	{{Annual readership\|scale=log}}		{{Annual readership\|scale=log}}
	{{Annual report\|]\|11,884,007}}		{{Annual report\|]\|11,884,007}}
	{{Top 25 report\|Sep 30 2018\|Sep 13 2020\|until\|Sep 27 2020}}		{{Top 25 report\|Sep 30 2018\|Sep 13 2020\|until\|Sep 27 2020}}


	<!-- Archiving converted from MiszaBot and HBC Archive Indexerbot to ClueBot III by ] -->		<!-- Archiving converted from MiszaBot and HBC Archive Indexerbot to ClueBot III by ] -->
Line 48:		Line 48:
	}}		}}
	{{TOC right}}		{{TOC right}}

	== Military spouse ==

	I this mention as there is no source provided that being a "former military spouse" is particularly notable in the context of her appointment to SCOTUS. (Her husband was a reservist and was called up for ] at most 2 years of service very early in their marriage.) A related discussion is at ]. --] <sup style="color:black">]</sup> 13:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

	:Incorrect. As the Supreme Court Historical Society has stated, veterans are important in the Supreme Court because military service "on the intersecting powers of the federal government," and "Justices who have served in the armed forces prior to serving on the Court have in how those powers function.” Again, you have not proven how that is not significant or unique, as is your burden.
	:Indeed, the Supreme Court itself tracks how many of its members have served in the military.
	:Further, at least one peer-reviewed academic article has discussed how military service impacts the Supreme Court justice's perspectives while on the Court. See, e.g., Diane Marie Amann, ''John Paul Stevens,'' ''Human Rights Judge'', 74 Fordham L. Rev. 1569, 1599 (2006). Specifically with reference to their thoughts on capital punishment. Another article discussed "how military service may have influenced Justice Stevens's decision-making process." Eugene R. Fidell, ''Justice John Paul Stevens and Judicial Deference in Military Matters'', 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 999, 1010 (2010). There is no shortage of decades of articles discussing the impact of military service on Supreme Court justices.
	:And one specifically mentions Ginsburg's service as relevant.
	:Those who has brought up this topic has a personal distaste for military service members and has been trying to erase the military from multiple wiki pages. For example, ], ], ]. ] (]) 15:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:40, 9 October 2024

Skip to table of contents

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ruth Bader Ginsburg article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 18, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 23, 2017	Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited
June 17, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed
A news item involving this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "In the news" column on September 19, 2020.
Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 15, 2017, and March 15, 2024.
Current status: Good article

This

level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Misplaced Pages:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States courts and judges High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish Women Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2020, when it received 11,884,007 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Categories: