| Revision as of 00:22, 23 November 2021 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,136,056 edits →ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message: new sectionTags: Reverted MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:54, 10 October 2024 edit undoDawgDeputy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,937 edits No nonsense allowed.Tag: Undo | ||
| (40 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Accidental block == | |||
| {{archivebox|]}} | |||
| Sorry, misclicked on your name rather than the vandal who'd posted on your talk page. ] (]) 21:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ANI report == | |||
| ==Talk page protection== | |||
| Hi - just following up on the ANI report. I've asked the other editor on their talk page not to be so in your face with warning templates, and to explain their thinking rather than edit warring; I hope you don't mind if I follow up with a couple of pointers for you too? Basically, Misplaced Pages articles should ideally be based around what independent, reliable sources say about a subject. I know if sounds a bit crazy to call 'watching a gameshow' ], but if you're figuring out the rules by watching the show, that's what you're doing - you're watching what happens, interpreting how the game works, and then writing your interpretation up here - we don't do that. My usual advice to editors is that if you can't find it in an independent, reliable source, leave it out of the article - it doesn't belong. So, yeah - I can see why they reverted you, but they didn't go about it in a very collegiate way. Hope this makes sense, let me know if you have any questions. Cheers ]] 17:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| I've semi-protected this cotton pickin' talk page for a year. I really don't like protecting user talk pages, especially for such a long time, because obviously it risks collateral damage on innocent editors, but under present circumstances it seems like the least bad option. You may like to consider doing what I have done when I've been in the same situation as you are now. I have created an alternative user talk page, called ], and when my main talk page is protected because of vandalism, I post a message on my main talk page with a link to the other one, inviting editors who can't edit the main page to post on the other one. Obviously the vandals and trolls could just post on the alternative talk page, but in practice for some reason they never do. I don't know why, but maybe there's no fun in trolling if you think it won't be publicly visible. Anyway, whatever the reason, I have used that method several times over the years, and I have found that it really does work, so I would encourage you to consider doing the same. ] (]) 15:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :Makes perfect sense. ] (]) 19:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|JBW}} My talk page on Wikiquote is semi-protected indefinitely against IP vandals, as well, and no one seems to be complaining. As to an alternative talk page, considering this vandal's level of trolling, I will just play it safe and not create an alternative until the troll is finally brought to justice (and denied unsupervised Internet privileges). ] (]) 17:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Recent edits == | |||
| Why are you {{Diff|Monopoly (game show)|prev|1032517751|reverting my edits|diffonly=yes}} and then {{Diff|Monopoly (game show)|1032517826|1032517751|reverting back|diffonly=yes}} to the language I originally used? ] (]) 13:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :Simply reverting takes up much less time. I have too much on my plate already. ] (]) 20:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == | |||
| <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
| <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </td></tr> | |||
| </table> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1056563210 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 11:54, 10 October 2024
Accidental block
Sorry, misclicked on your name rather than the vandal who'd posted on your talk page. Nthep (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Talk page protection
I've semi-protected this cotton pickin' talk page for a year. I really don't like protecting user talk pages, especially for such a long time, because obviously it risks collateral damage on innocent editors, but under present circumstances it seems like the least bad option. You may like to consider doing what I have done when I've been in the same situation as you are now. I have created an alternative user talk page, called User talk:JBW/Open, and when my main talk page is protected because of vandalism, I post a message on my main talk page with a link to the other one, inviting editors who can't edit the main page to post on the other one. Obviously the vandals and trolls could just post on the alternative talk page, but in practice for some reason they never do. I don't know why, but maybe there's no fun in trolling if you think it won't be publicly visible. Anyway, whatever the reason, I have used that method several times over the years, and I have found that it really does work, so I would encourage you to consider doing the same. JBW (talk) 15:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- @JBW: My talk page on Wikiquote is semi-protected indefinitely against IP vandals, as well, and no one seems to be complaining. As to an alternative talk page, considering this vandal's level of trolling, I will just play it safe and not create an alternative until the troll is finally brought to justice (and denied unsupervised Internet privileges). DawgDeputy (talk) 17:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)