| Revision as of 12:57, 9 August 2006 editOtto4711 (talk | contribs)59,599 editsm →What's up with this redirect -or- Here I thought I was being so clever← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:58, 12 October 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,824 edits Joan Crawford listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | #REDIRECT] | ||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the ], where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| Here are a few good links for newcomers: | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me or a helper ] on our talk page. Again, welcome! | |||
| If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the '''Talk Section''' of | |||
| ] 21:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| There's a page I want to split but I can't find step-by-step instructions on how to do it, to make sure that existing links point to the split-off page, etc. | |||
| :: What's the page, and what's the kind of splitting you want to do? -- <small> ]</small> 20:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::], I want to split the section on Katya Derevko off onto its own page and make sure all the links which currently redirect to Irina get pointed to the new page.] 21:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Also I would like to know how to insert the Character chart that's found at the bottom of the Irina page into the new page and how to add characters to the chart.] 21:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Firstly, take a look at ]. | |||
| I'm not advocating the splitting of the article - perhaps an ''Alias'' wiki (that deals just with ''Alias'') is what you are looking for. | |||
| To do the split you just create the new article. You would need to check the "What links here" for the ] page (available in the toolbox, under the search bar) to fix any links. The "Character chart" is a template available at ]. Any change to the template will affect all pages it's used on - so discuss on the talk page first.--] 22:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == OK, I give up == | |||
| How do I add something to a category page, for example http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Fictional_technology | |||
| :To add a page to that category you do not edit the category page itself. You add ''<nowiki>]</nowiki>'' at the bottom of the article you want to add. Check out any article, eg ], to see how categories are added.--] 07:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==TAR== | |||
| Hello Otto...thanks for your note. I guess the 'issue' about Frankenberry is that there are multiple editors of the page all of whom don't recall this nickname. As I stated, I've just rewatched all the episodes (not because of this!) and don't hear it. If it is in there once, does that constitue a real nickname? If I am hearing Fran N' Barry but they said Frankenberry once...does that truly need to be in the page. I guess that will be a discussion point. As you might have seen I have reopened the discussion on the TAR discussion page. With regards to having to 'prove' this, all the other nicknames are easily recalled by multiple editors thus there wasn't a need to specify an episode/timestamp. Those nicknames were used continously in multiple episodes by multiple teams. ] 12:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Andrian Lazarey== | |||
| Please do not remove maintenance tags; they are there so that editors can provide the appropriate citations and references to the information on the article. | |||
| There's no indication of where the information is from. The actual television show? The official website? A fan website? An article in '']'' or the '']''? Please leave the tag there, so that the appropriate references can be added by editors. --] 16:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I believe the Alias section would greatly benefit from an article on FTL, seeing as there is one for almost every major intelligence organization on the show. As I am not a member, I cannot do this myself, and last time I submitted an article to the article requests section, it was ignored. So, here is my article. Feel free to edit it as you will. | |||
| '''FTL''' is a fictional Chinese organized crime group on the TV series '']'' that deals in intelligence. It is featured in the first season. It is based in ] and led by Quan Li. Another known operative is the torturer Dr. Jong Lee, aka "Suit and Glasses." FTL is a rival of the ] (mainly SD-6), ], and the ]. At the beginning of the series, FTL appears to be ahead of the other groups in the hunt for artifacts of ], as many artifacts are retrieved from FTL bases. In the pilot, we learn that FTL was responsible for the death of ], a modern-day alchemist (who based his work off of Rambaldi's designs) who is later revealed to have once headed the ] project. Later in the season, FTL headquarters is raided by agents of ] led by ]. Quan Li is assassinated by Sark in public. After that, its agent roster was compromised, and presumably most of its agents were either killed or forced to work for the Man. | |||
| {{Alias}} | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I added those comments you made about Claudia to the article, which could give us an indication of what could happen during the series' run, which means we could see more models with related LGBT ties or other personal issues. ] 18:36 (UTC) 26 June 2006 | |||
| ==Production Staff== | |||
| What production staff are you talking about that have appeared in 2 out of 3 hours of Treasure Hunters?]<sup>]</sup><small>]</small><sub>]</sub> 18:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :The medical guy in episode 2 and the rescue divers and other production people who were hovering around the Browns in Hawaii.] 19:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::And this amounts to two whole hours how?]<sup>]</sup><small>]</small><sub>]</sub> 19:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::There have been three hours of programming. Production staff appeared in hour one of programming and hour three of programming. I didn't say they appeared in "two whole hours" of the show. That doesn't even make sense. | |||
| ::::Production staff are also in TAR a lot. There are production people at a zipline which I think was in season 7. Another instince was season 9 when Fran was having a hard time bungee jumping. Also, the most obvious is also season seven when Brian and Greg flip their van and the camera guy is lying on the ground.]<sup>]</sup><small>]</small><sub>]</sub> 20:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I didn't say that TAR staff are never seen on-camera. I said that the producers take pains not to break the 4th wall. See the trivia section for ] where it talks about how TAR goes as far as digitally removing members of the crew in post-production. | |||
| Honestly, I don't really care all that strongly about that particular item. I do think it's a somewhat significant difference between the two shows and it's worth including, and obviously I would prefer that it stay, but if it truly, truly bugs you so much to have it in the article then I'm not going to fuss if it gets deleted.] 20:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I would like to put back the comments about good vs. evil... They are NPOV--the point is that some viewers thought her good and others thought her evil, and the final episode resolves it (not a POV, but fact). I worry your deletion of that stemmed from some possessiveness. Please respond on my talk page--] 09:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Reversion of special characters == | |||
| Why when I edit articles do special characters (arrows, accented characters) sometimes suddenly spontaneously turn into question marks? See for example ] in which a minor edit by me nowhere near any of them caused every arrow and accented character on the page to mutate. ] 21:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :It's most likely the browser you're using, or the ] that your browser is using at the moment. Have you tried changing the encoding to Unicode ]? --<font face="verdana"><small>]</small><nowiki>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub></font>] 21:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == What's up with this redirect -or- Here I thought I was being so clever == | |||
| {{helpme}} | |||
| So I thought I would cleverly use an existing page to start a new article since the existing page was no longer necessary but instead I somehow both created the article and turned the existing page into a redirect which I can't get pointed to the right place. ] should either be deleted or redirected to ] but I can't make it happen. What am I doing wrong? ] 12:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:58, 12 October 2024
Redirect to:
Good article reassessment for Casey Donovan (actor)
Casey Donovan (actor) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Joan Crawford
Joan Crawford has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)