| Revision as of 03:22, 20 October 2002 editDanny (talk | contribs)41,414 edits Before telling me to read something, you should read it yourself← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:28, 14 October 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,172 edits Earth's magnetic field listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| (784 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I haven't broken a single rule, and I'm being banned by people who hold personal grudges against me. Several Wikipedians have questioned the validity of this ban, so there is clearly not consensus, and meanwhile those banning me have utterly ignored the entire dispute resolution process; in addition, they have banned me from IRC, the mailing list, and are censoring my user_talk page so as to prevent me from having any chance of ever appealing this. All I want is a fair trial before the arbitration committee, where the specific evidence against me is spelled out, and I am given a chance to present my side of the story.|decline=arbcom-l (at) lists (dot) wikimedia.org ]<sup>g</sup> 19:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| The page ] has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This was done under ], because it was an ] disambiguation page which either | |||
| Hi Lir. Great stuff you're writing. ] | |||
| :::*disambiguated only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a ]); | |||
| :::* disambiguated zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title; or | |||
| :::*was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function. | |||
| Under the ], such pages may be deleted at any time. Please ]. | |||
| Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=SmarTruck|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at ]. <!-- Template:Db-disambig-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 22:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :Right. Great stuff. Like this little gem he added to Iowa State- "Common pasttimes at Iowa State include drinking, smoking, tripping, and complaining." He's a regular Noah Webster. ] | |||
| == "Hierachy" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 24#Hierachy}} until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <small>]</small> <sup>]</sup> 08:47, 24 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ---- | |||
| <blockquote>'''No evidence of meeting ].'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Hey Lir, you might want to check out ] which explains how to cleanly move/rename a page while keeping its edit history intact. --] 23:52 Oct 3, 2002 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 20:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :While you're at it, don't forget to take a quick look over the ]. --] 00:42 Oct 4, 2002 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ---- | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 15:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| In reference to the question you posted to Mav (and please use user talk pages for that sort of thing rather than the user page itself), you can find most of what you'd want to know about character sets at ]. | |||
| ---- | |||
| Lir, if you would offer some scintilla of proof that Christopher Columbus was a slave trader prior to his 1492 voyage, people will stop reverting what you have insisted on putting into his article. But as long as you just keep changing it back without proof, people will keep reverting it again. -- ] | |||
| It's the responsibility of the person who MAKES a claim to substantiate it, it is not the responsibility of those who question it to have to dig up evidence. You sound like Helga. Again, if you can't be bothered to prove your claim, it will get reverted. -- ] | |||
| You want to insult me, go ahead and do that, it won't change the fact that you have shown no proof of your claim. Therefore, every time you claim that he was a slave trader, you will get reverted. I'll put the article on my watch list to keep track of it. -- ] | |||
| what proof do you want? Im not insulting you. You are insulting me by attacking what I have written without justification. Any iota of attempt on your part to verify this basic fact would reveal that I am correct. | |||
| HOW DARE YOU!!! You don't KNOW me, and to CLAIM that I am a racist because YOU refuse to JUSTIFY your claim is slander. I am FURIOUS! All it would take would be for you to offer ONE scintilla of proof, but you have refused to do that. I will NOT back down on this. -- ] | |||
| ---- | |||
| I've heard the slave trading bits before too, but never a citation. Could you provide that please? I'd like to look it up. And no, don't tell me to look it up now, I've tried already and not been successful (unless you count various webpages, which, well, I don't.) I'm not so good at research, so you'll have to point me to an author and a book title. :-) ] | |||
| ---- | |||
| Okay, I've poked around online (it's 11 p.m. Saturday, the library is closed) for Columbus information, and the one clear fact is that Columbus's wife was the daughter of a navigator who worked for ]. Various sources found by googling have him exploring around Thule, or trading to Madeira, or otherwise exploring or working on a sailing ship. ] | |||
| ---- | |||
| Those are all websites you gave me, so I guess I'll have to check my library for his diary. Funny it never occurred to me he might have one. ] | |||
| Lir, I have Las Casas book in front of me. He writes about what happened in the fifty years after Columbus landed in the New World. He writes NOTHING about what Columbus did before that. He writes next to nothing about Columbus himself. What exactly are you referring to in the book? ] | |||
| Actually, Lir, you just cluttered my talk page. I am not denying he was involved in the slave trade. I am agree that what happened in the Indies in the 16th century was one of the worst cases of genocide ever inflicted on a population. The question is whether his role in the slave trade (if, indeed, he was involved) before his voyage across the Atlantic is the defining statement of his life's career. BTW, he was also trading wool and other fabrics (that's from his diary, which you like to mention) and looking for cheaper routes to China and India. Slaves were one commodity he may have dealt with, that is all. Oh, and before you call me a racist, I develop curricula on genocide professionally. ] | |||
Latest revision as of 15:28, 14 October 2024
Lir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I haven't broken a single rule, and I'm being banned by people who hold personal grudges against me. Several Wikipedians have questioned the validity of this ban, so there is clearly not consensus, and meanwhile those banning me have utterly ignored the entire dispute resolution process; in addition, they have banned me from IRC, the mailing list, and are censoring my user_talk page so as to prevent me from having any chance of ever appealing this. All I want is a fair trial before the arbitration committee, where the specific evidence against me is spelled out, and I am given a chance to present my side of the story.
Decline reason:
arbcom-l (at) lists (dot) wikimedia.org Doc 19:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion of SmarTruck
The page SmarTruck has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguated only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguated zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title; or
- was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Deletion Review. Liz 22:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
"Hierachy" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hierachy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 24 § Hierachy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris 08:47, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of List of satellites which have provided data on Earth's magnetosphere
The article List of satellites which have provided data on Earth's magnetosphere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of meeting WP:NLIST.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Earth's magnetic field
Earth's magnetic field has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)