Misplaced Pages

Euler–Maclaurin formula: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:43, 21 August 2021 edit5.81.101.117 (talk) Derivation by mathematical induction← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:21, 15 October 2024 edit undoRsjaffe (talk | contribs)Administrators55,205 editsm clean up, typo(s) fixed: Therefore → Therefore,Tag: AWB 
(15 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Use American English|date = March 2019}}
{{Short description|Summation formula}} {{Short description|Summation formula}}
{{Use American English|date = March 2019}}
In ], the '''Euler–Maclaurin formula''' is a formula for the difference between an ] and a closely related ]. It can be used to approximate integrals by finite sums, or conversely to evaluate finite sums and ] using integrals and the machinery of ]. For example, many asymptotic expansions are derived from the formula, and ] for the sum of powers is an immediate consequence. In ], the '''Euler–Maclaurin formula''' is a formula for the difference between an ] and a closely related ]. It can be used to approximate integrals by finite sums, or conversely to evaluate finite sums and ] using integrals and the machinery of ]. For example, many asymptotic expansions are derived from the formula, and ] for the sum of powers is an immediate consequence.


Line 10: Line 10:
can be approximated by the sum (or vice versa) can be approximated by the sum (or vice versa)
<math display=block>S = f(m + 1) + \cdots + f(n - 1) + f(n)</math> <math display=block>S = f(m + 1) + \cdots + f(n - 1) + f(n)</math>
(see ]). The Euler–Maclaurin formula provides expressions for the difference between the sum and the integral in terms of the higher ]s {{math|''f''{{isup|(''k'')}}(''x'')}} evaluated at the endpoints of the interval, that is to say {{math|''x'' {{=}} ''m''}} and {{math|''x'' {{=}} ''n''}}. (see ]). The Euler–Maclaurin formula provides expressions for the difference between the sum and the integral in terms of the higher ]s {{math|''f''{{isup|(''k'')}}(''x'')}} evaluated at the endpoints of the interval, that is to say {{math|''x'' {{=}} ''m''}} and {{math|''x'' {{=}} ''n''}}.


Explicitly, for {{mvar|p}} a positive ] and a function {{math|''f''(''x'')}} that is {{mvar|p}} times ] on the interval {{math|]}}, we have Explicitly, for {{mvar|p}} a positive ] and a function {{math|''f''(''x'')}} that is {{mvar|p}} times ] on the interval {{math|}}, we have
<math display=block>S - I = \sum_{k=1}^p {\frac{B_k}{k!} \left(f^{(k - 1)}(n) - f^{(k - 1)}(m)\right)} + R_p,</math> <math display=block>S - I = \sum_{k=1}^p {\frac{B_k}{k!} \left(f^{(k - 1)}(n) - f^{(k - 1)}(m)\right)} + R_p,</math>
where {{mvar|B<sub>k</sub>}} is the {{mvar|k}}th ] (with {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} {{sfrac|1|2}}}}) and {{mvar|R<sub>p</sub>}} is an ] which depends on {{mvar|n}}, {{mvar|m}}, {{mvar|p}}, and {{mvar|f}} and is usually small for suitable values of {{mvar|p}}. where {{mvar|B<sub>k</sub>}} is the {{mvar|k}}th ] (with {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub> {{=}} {{sfrac|1|2}}}}) and {{mvar|R<sub>p</sub>}} is an ] which depends on {{mvar|n}}, {{mvar|m}}, {{mvar|p}}, and {{mvar|f}} and is usually small for suitable values of {{mvar|p}}.
Line 28: Line 28:


===The remainder term=== ===The remainder term===
{{seealso|Bernoulli polynomials}} {{see also|Bernoulli polynomials}}


The remainder term arises because the integral is usually not exactly equal to the sum. The formula may be derived by applying repeated ] to successive intervals {{math|}} for {{math|''r'' {{=}} ''m'', ''m'' + 1, …, ''n'' − 1}}. The boundary terms in these integrations lead to the main terms of the formula, and the leftover integrals form the remainder term. The remainder term arises because the integral is usually not exactly equal to the sum. The formula may be derived by applying repeated ] to successive intervals {{math|}} for {{math|''r'' {{=}} ''m'', ''m'' + 1, …, ''n'' − 1}}. The boundary terms in these integrations lead to the main terms of the formula, and the leftover integrals form the remainder term.
Line 42: Line 42:


With this notation, the remainder term {{mvar|R<sub>p</sub>}} equals With this notation, the remainder term {{mvar|R<sub>p</sub>}} equals
<math display=block>R_p = (-1)^{p+1}\int_m^n f^{(p)}(x) \frac{P_p(x)}{p!}\,dx. </math> <math display="block">R_{p} = (-1)^{p+1}\int_m^n f^{(p)}(x) \frac{P_p(x)}{p!}\,dx. </math>


When {{math|''k'' > 0}}, it can be shown that When {{math|''k'' > 0}}, it can be shown that for {{math|0 ≤ ''x'' ≤ 1}},
<math display=block>\bigl|B_k(x)\bigr| \le \frac{2 \cdot k!}{(2\pi)^k}\zeta(k),</math> <math display=block>\bigl|B_k(x)\bigr| \le \frac{2 \cdot k!}{(2\pi)^k}\zeta(k),</math>
where {{mvar|ζ}} denotes the ]; one approach to prove this inequality is to obtain the Fourier series for the polynomials {{math|''B<sub>k</sub>''(''x'')}}. The bound is achieved for even {{mvar|k}} when {{mvar|x}} is zero. The term {{math|''ζ''(''k'')}} may be omitted for odd {{mvar|k}} but the proof in this case is more complex (see Lehmer).<ref name="Lehmer">{{cite journal|last1=Lehmer|first1=D. H.|author-link=D. H. Lehmer |title=On the maxima and minima of Bernoulli polynomials | date=1940 | journal=]|volume=47|issue=8|pages=533–538 |doi=10.2307/2303833|jstor=2303833}}</ref> Using this inequality, the size of the remainder term can be estimated as where {{mvar|ζ}} denotes the ]; one approach to prove this inequality is to obtain the Fourier series for the polynomials {{math|''B<sub>k</sub>''(''x'')}}. The bound is achieved for even {{mvar|k}} when {{mvar|x}} is zero. The term {{math|''ζ''(''k'')}} may be omitted for odd {{mvar|k}} but the proof in this case is more complex (see Lehmer).<ref name="Lehmer">{{cite journal|last1=Lehmer|first1=D. H.|author-link=D. H. Lehmer |title=On the maxima and minima of Bernoulli polynomials | date=1940 | journal=]|volume=47|issue=8|pages=533–538 |doi=10.2307/2303833|jstor=2303833}}</ref> Using this inequality, the size of the remainder term can be estimated as
Line 51: Line 51:
===Low-order cases=== ===Low-order cases===


The Bernoulli numbers from {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub>}} to {{math|''B''<sub>7</sub>}} are {{math|{{sfrac|1|2}}, {{sfrac|1|6}}, 0, −{{sfrac|1|30}}, 0, {{sfrac|1|42}}, 0}}. Therefore the low-order cases of the Euler–Maclaurin formula are: The Bernoulli numbers from {{math|''B''<sub>1</sub>}} to {{math|''B''<sub>7</sub>}} are {{math|{{sfrac|1|2}}, {{sfrac|1|6}}, 0, −{{sfrac|1|30}}, 0, {{sfrac|1|42}}, 0}}. Therefore, the low-order cases of the Euler–Maclaurin formula are:
<math display=block>\begin{align} <math display=block>\begin{align}
\sum_{i=m}^n f(i) - \int_m^n f(x)\,dx &= \frac{f(m)+f(n)}{2} + \int_m^n f'(x)P_1(x)\,dx \\ \sum_{i=m}^n f(i) - \int_m^n f(x)\,dx &= \frac{f(m)+f(n)}{2} + \int_m^n f'(x)P_1(x)\,dx \\
Line 81: Line 81:


===Sums involving a polynomial=== ===Sums involving a polynomial===
{{seealso|Faulhaber's formula}} {{see also|Faulhaber's formula}}
If {{mvar|f}} is a ] and {{mvar|p}} is big enough, then the remainder term vanishes. For instance, if {{math|''f''(''x'') {{=}} ''x''<sup>3</sup>}}, we can choose {{math|''p'' {{=}} 2}} to obtain, after simplification, If {{mvar|f}} is a ] and {{mvar|p}} is big enough, then the remainder term vanishes. For instance, if {{math|''f''(''x'') {{=}} ''x''<sup>3</sup>}}, we can choose {{math|''p'' {{=}} 2}} to obtain, after simplification,
<math display=block>\sum_{i=0}^n i^3 = \left(\frac{n(n + 1)}{2}\right)^2.</math> <math display=block>\sum_{i=0}^n i^3 = \left(\frac{n(n + 1)}{2}\right)^2.</math>
Line 139: Line 139:
B_3(x) &= x^3 - \tfrac{3}{2}x^2 + \tfrac{1}{2}x, \\ B_3(x) &= x^3 - \tfrac{3}{2}x^2 + \tfrac{1}{2}x, \\
B_4(x) &= x^4 - 2x^3 + x^2 - \tfrac{1}{30}, \\ B_4(x) &= x^4 - 2x^3 + x^2 - \tfrac{1}{30}, \\
&\vdots &\,\,\,\vdots
\end{align}</math> \end{align}</math>


The values {{math|''B<sub>n</sub>''(0)}} are the ] {{math|''B''<sub>''n''</sub>}}. Notice that for {{math|''n'' ≠ 1}} we have The values {{math|''B<sub>n</sub>''(1)}} are the ] {{math|''B''<sub>''n''</sub>}}. Notice that for {{math|''n'' ≠ 1}} we have
<math display=block>B_n = B_n(0) = B_n(1),</math> <math display=block>B_n = B_n(1) = B_n(0),</math>
and for {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}}, and for {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}},
<math display=block>B_1 = B_1(0) = -B_1(1).</math> <math display=block>B_1 = B_1(1) = -B_1(0).</math>


The functions {{math|''P''<sub>''n''</sub>}} agree with the Bernoulli polynomials on the interval {{math|}} and are ] with period 1. Furthermore, except when {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}}, they are also continuous. Thus, The functions {{math|''P''<sub>''n''</sub>}} agree with the Bernoulli polynomials on the interval {{math|}} and are ] with period 1. Furthermore, except when {{math|''n'' {{=}} 1}}, they are also continuous. Thus,
Line 193: Line 193:


Summing from {{math|''k'' {{=}} 0}} to {{math|''k'' {{=}} ''n'' &minus; 1}} and substituting this for the lower order error term results in the {{math|''p'' {{=}} 2}} case of the formula, Summing from {{math|''k'' {{=}} 0}} to {{math|''k'' {{=}} ''n'' &minus; 1}} and substituting this for the lower order error term results in the {{math|''p'' {{=}} 2}} case of the formula,
<math display=block>\sum_{k=1}^n f(k) = \int_0^n f(x)\,dx + \frac{f(n) + f(0)}{2} + \frac{B_2}{2}\bigl(f'(n) - f'(0)\bigr) - \frac{1}{2}\int_0^n f''(x)P_2(x)\,dx.</math> <math display=block>\sum_{k=1}^n f(k) = \int_0^n f(x)\,dx + \frac{f(n) - f(0)}{2} + \frac{B_2}{2}\bigl(f'(n) - f'(0)\bigr) - \frac{1}{2}\int_0^n f''(x)P_2(x)\,dx.</math>


This process can be iterated. In this way we get a proof of the Euler–Maclaurin summation formula which can be formalized by ], in which the induction step relies on integration by parts and on identities for periodic Bernoulli functions. This process can be iterated. In this way we get a proof of the Euler–Maclaurin summation formula which can be formalized by ], in which the induction step relies on integration by parts and on identities for periodic Bernoulli functions.
Line 209: Line 209:
==Further reading== ==Further reading==
{{refbegin}} {{refbegin}}
* {{cite journal|first1= H. W. |last1=Gould | first2=William | last2=Squire | title = Maclaurin's second formula and its generalization | year=1963| journal=Amer. Math. Monthly | volume=70 | number=1 | pages=44-52| jstor=2312783 | mr=0146551 | doi=10.2307/2312783}} * {{cite journal|first1= H. W. |last1=Gould | first2=William | last2=Squire | title = Maclaurin's second formula and its generalization | year=1963| journal=Amer. Math. Monthly | volume=70 | number=1 | pages=44–52| jstor=2312783 | mr=0146551 | doi=10.2307/2312783}}
* {{cite web|last1=Gourdon | first1=Xavier|last2=Sebah|first2=Pascal |url=http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/Miscellaneous/bernoulli.html |title= Introduction on Bernoulli's numbers|year=2002}} * {{cite web|last1=Gourdon | first1=Xavier|last2=Sebah|first2=Pascal |url=http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/Miscellaneous/bernoulli.html |title= Introduction on Bernoulli's numbers|year=2002}}
* {{cite journal|first1=Erich | last1=Martensen | title= On the generalized Euler-Maclaurin formula|journal=Z. Angew. Math. Mech. | volume =85 | number=12 | pages=858-863 | doi=10.1002/zamm.200410217 | mr=2184846 | year=2005}} * {{cite journal|first1=Erich | last1=Martensen | title= On the generalized Euler-Maclaurin formula|journal=Z. Angew. Math. Mech. | volume =85 | number=12 | pages=858–863 | doi=10.1002/zamm.200410217 | mr=2184846 | year=2005| bibcode=2005ZaMM...85..858M | s2cid=123419717 }}
* {{cite book | first1=Hugh L. |last=Montgomery | author-link=Hugh Montgomery (mathematician) |first2=Robert C. |last2=Vaughan |author-link2=Robert Charles Vaughan (mathematician) | title=Multiplicative number theory I. Classical theory | series=Cambridge tracts in advanced mathematics | volume=97 | year=2007 | isbn=0-521-84903-9 | pages=495–519}} * {{cite book | first1=Hugh L. |last1=Montgomery | author-link=Hugh Montgomery (mathematician) |first2=Robert C. |last2=Vaughan |author-link2=Robert Charles Vaughan (mathematician) | title=Multiplicative number theory I. Classical theory | series=Cambridge tracts in advanced mathematics | volume=97 | year=2007 | isbn=978-0-521-84903-6 | pages=495–519}}
{{refend}} {{refend}}


Line 219: Line 219:


{{Leonhard Euler}} {{Leonhard Euler}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Euler-Maclaurin Formula}}
{{Calculus topics}} {{Calculus topics}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Euler-Maclaurin Formula}}
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 21:21, 15 October 2024

Summation formula

In mathematics, the Euler–Maclaurin formula is a formula for the difference between an integral and a closely related sum. It can be used to approximate integrals by finite sums, or conversely to evaluate finite sums and infinite series using integrals and the machinery of calculus. For example, many asymptotic expansions are derived from the formula, and Faulhaber's formula for the sum of powers is an immediate consequence.

The formula was discovered independently by Leonhard Euler and Colin Maclaurin around 1735. Euler needed it to compute slowly converging infinite series while Maclaurin used it to calculate integrals. It was later generalized to Darboux's formula.

The formula

If m and n are natural numbers and f(x) is a real or complex valued continuous function for real numbers x in the interval , then the integral I = m n f ( x ) d x {\displaystyle I=\int _{m}^{n}f(x)\,dx} can be approximated by the sum (or vice versa) S = f ( m + 1 ) + + f ( n 1 ) + f ( n ) {\displaystyle S=f(m+1)+\cdots +f(n-1)+f(n)} (see rectangle method). The Euler–Maclaurin formula provides expressions for the difference between the sum and the integral in terms of the higher derivatives f(x) evaluated at the endpoints of the interval, that is to say x = m and x = n.

Explicitly, for p a positive integer and a function f(x) that is p times continuously differentiable on the interval , we have S I = k = 1 p B k k ! ( f ( k 1 ) ( n ) f ( k 1 ) ( m ) ) + R p , {\displaystyle S-I=\sum _{k=1}^{p}{{\frac {B_{k}}{k!}}\left(f^{(k-1)}(n)-f^{(k-1)}(m)\right)}+R_{p},} where Bk is the kth Bernoulli number (with B1 = ⁠1/2⁠) and Rp is an error term which depends on n, m, p, and f and is usually small for suitable values of p.

The formula is often written with the subscript taking only even values, since the odd Bernoulli numbers are zero except for B1. In this case we have i = m n f ( i ) = m n f ( x ) d x + f ( n ) + f ( m ) 2 + k = 1 p 2 B 2 k ( 2 k ) ! ( f ( 2 k 1 ) ( n ) f ( 2 k 1 ) ( m ) ) + R p , {\displaystyle \sum _{i=m}^{n}f(i)=\int _{m}^{n}f(x)\,dx+{\frac {f(n)+f(m)}{2}}+\sum _{k=1}^{\left\lfloor {\frac {p}{2}}\right\rfloor }{\frac {B_{2k}}{(2k)!}}\left(f^{(2k-1)}(n)-f^{(2k-1)}(m)\right)+R_{p},} or alternatively i = m + 1 n f ( i ) = m n f ( x ) d x + f ( n ) f ( m ) 2 + k = 1 p 2 B 2 k ( 2 k ) ! ( f ( 2 k 1 ) ( n ) f ( 2 k 1 ) ( m ) ) + R p . {\displaystyle \sum _{i=m+1}^{n}f(i)=\int _{m}^{n}f(x)\,dx+{\frac {f(n)-f(m)}{2}}+\sum _{k=1}^{\left\lfloor {\frac {p}{2}}\right\rfloor }{\frac {B_{2k}}{(2k)!}}\left(f^{(2k-1)}(n)-f^{(2k-1)}(m)\right)+R_{p}.}

The remainder term

See also: Bernoulli polynomials

The remainder term arises because the integral is usually not exactly equal to the sum. The formula may be derived by applying repeated integration by parts to successive intervals for r = m, m + 1, …, n − 1. The boundary terms in these integrations lead to the main terms of the formula, and the leftover integrals form the remainder term.

The remainder term has an exact expression in terms of the periodized Bernoulli functions Pk(x). The Bernoulli polynomials may be defined recursively by B0(x) = 1 and, for k ≥ 1, B k ( x ) = k B k 1 ( x ) , 0 1 B k ( x ) d x = 0. {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}B_{k}'(x)&=kB_{k-1}(x),\\\int _{0}^{1}B_{k}(x)\,dx&=0.\end{aligned}}} The periodized Bernoulli functions are defined as P k ( x ) = B k ( x x ) , {\displaystyle P_{k}(x)=B_{k}{\bigl (}x-\lfloor x\rfloor {\bigr )},} where ⌊x⌋ denotes the largest integer less than or equal to x, so that x − ⌊x⌋ always lies in the interval [0,1).

With this notation, the remainder term Rp equals R p = ( 1 ) p + 1 m n f ( p ) ( x ) P p ( x ) p ! d x . {\displaystyle R_{p}=(-1)^{p+1}\int _{m}^{n}f^{(p)}(x){\frac {P_{p}(x)}{p!}}\,dx.}

When k > 0, it can be shown that for 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, | B k ( x ) | 2 k ! ( 2 π ) k ζ ( k ) , {\displaystyle {\bigl |}B_{k}(x){\bigr |}\leq {\frac {2\cdot k!}{(2\pi )^{k}}}\zeta (k),} where ζ denotes the Riemann zeta function; one approach to prove this inequality is to obtain the Fourier series for the polynomials Bk(x). The bound is achieved for even k when x is zero. The term ζ(k) may be omitted for odd k but the proof in this case is more complex (see Lehmer). Using this inequality, the size of the remainder term can be estimated as | R p | 2 ζ ( p ) ( 2 π ) p m n | f ( p ) ( x ) | d x . {\displaystyle \left|R_{p}\right|\leq {\frac {2\zeta (p)}{(2\pi )^{p}}}\int _{m}^{n}\left|f^{(p)}(x)\right|\,dx.}

Low-order cases

The Bernoulli numbers from B1 to B7 are ⁠1/2⁠, ⁠1/6⁠, 0, −⁠1/30⁠, 0, ⁠1/42⁠, 0. Therefore, the low-order cases of the Euler–Maclaurin formula are: i = m n f ( i ) m n f ( x ) d x = f ( m ) + f ( n ) 2 + m n f ( x ) P 1 ( x ) d x = f ( m ) + f ( n ) 2 + 1 6 f ( n ) f ( m ) 2 ! m n f ( x ) P 2 ( x ) 2 ! d x = f ( m ) + f ( n ) 2 + 1 6 f ( n ) f ( m ) 2 ! + m n f ( x ) P 3 ( x ) 3 ! d x = f ( m ) + f ( n ) 2 + 1 6 f ( n ) f ( m ) 2 ! 1 30 f ( n ) f ( m ) 4 ! m n f ( 4 ) ( x ) P 4 ( x ) 4 ! d x = f ( m ) + f ( n ) 2 + 1 6 f ( n ) f ( m ) 2 ! 1 30 f ( n ) f ( m ) 4 ! + m n f ( 5 ) ( x ) P 5 ( x ) 5 ! d x = f ( m ) + f ( n ) 2 + 1 6 f ( n ) f ( m ) 2 ! 1 30 f ( n ) f ( m ) 4 ! + 1 42 f ( 5 ) ( n ) f ( 5 ) ( m ) 6 ! m n f ( 6 ) ( x ) P 6 ( x ) 6 ! d x = f ( m ) + f ( n ) 2 + 1 6 f ( n ) f ( m ) 2 ! 1 30 f ( n ) f ( m ) 4 ! + 1 42 f ( 5 ) ( n ) f ( 5 ) ( m ) 6 ! + m n f ( 7 ) ( x ) P 7 ( x ) 7 ! d x . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\sum _{i=m}^{n}f(i)-\int _{m}^{n}f(x)\,dx&={\frac {f(m)+f(n)}{2}}+\int _{m}^{n}f'(x)P_{1}(x)\,dx\\&={\frac {f(m)+f(n)}{2}}+{\frac {1}{6}}{\frac {f'(n)-f'(m)}{2!}}-\int _{m}^{n}f''(x){\frac {P_{2}(x)}{2!}}\,dx\\&={\frac {f(m)+f(n)}{2}}+{\frac {1}{6}}{\frac {f'(n)-f'(m)}{2!}}+\int _{m}^{n}f'''(x){\frac {P_{3}(x)}{3!}}\,dx\\&={\frac {f(m)+f(n)}{2}}+{\frac {1}{6}}{\frac {f'(n)-f'(m)}{2!}}-{\frac {1}{30}}{\frac {f'''(n)-f'''(m)}{4!}}-\int _{m}^{n}f^{(4)}(x){\frac {P_{4}(x)}{4!}}\,dx\\&={\frac {f(m)+f(n)}{2}}+{\frac {1}{6}}{\frac {f'(n)-f'(m)}{2!}}-{\frac {1}{30}}{\frac {f'''(n)-f'''(m)}{4!}}+\int _{m}^{n}f^{(5)}(x){\frac {P_{5}(x)}{5!}}\,dx\\&={\frac {f(m)+f(n)}{2}}+{\frac {1}{6}}{\frac {f'(n)-f'(m)}{2!}}-{\frac {1}{30}}{\frac {f'''(n)-f'''(m)}{4!}}+{\frac {1}{42}}{\frac {f^{(5)}(n)-f^{(5)}(m)}{6!}}-\int _{m}^{n}f^{(6)}(x){\frac {P_{6}(x)}{6!}}\,dx\\&={\frac {f(m)+f(n)}{2}}+{\frac {1}{6}}{\frac {f'(n)-f'(m)}{2!}}-{\frac {1}{30}}{\frac {f'''(n)-f'''(m)}{4!}}+{\frac {1}{42}}{\frac {f^{(5)}(n)-f^{(5)}(m)}{6!}}+\int _{m}^{n}f^{(7)}(x){\frac {P_{7}(x)}{7!}}\,dx.\end{aligned}}}

Applications

The Basel problem

The Basel problem is to determine the sum 1 + 1 4 + 1 9 + 1 16 + 1 25 + = n = 1 1 n 2 . {\displaystyle 1+{\frac {1}{4}}+{\frac {1}{9}}+{\frac {1}{16}}+{\frac {1}{25}}+\cdots =\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{n^{2}}}.}

Euler computed this sum to 20 decimal places with only a few terms of the Euler–Maclaurin formula in 1735. This probably convinced him that the sum equals ⁠π/6⁠, which he proved in the same year.

Sums involving a polynomial

See also: Faulhaber's formula

If f is a polynomial and p is big enough, then the remainder term vanishes. For instance, if f(x) = x, we can choose p = 2 to obtain, after simplification, i = 0 n i 3 = ( n ( n + 1 ) 2 ) 2 . {\displaystyle \sum _{i=0}^{n}i^{3}=\left({\frac {n(n+1)}{2}}\right)^{2}.}

Approximation of integrals

The formula provides a means of approximating a finite integral. Let a < b be the endpoints of the interval of integration. Fix N, the number of points to use in the approximation, and denote the corresponding step size by h = ⁠ba/N − 1⁠. Set xi = a + (i − 1)h, so that x1 = a and xN = b. Then: I = a b f ( x ) d x h ( f ( x 1 ) 2 + f ( x 2 ) + + f ( x N 1 ) + f ( x N ) 2 ) + h 2 12 [ f ( x 1 ) f ( x N ) ] h 4 720 [ f ( x 1 ) f ( x N ) ] + {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}I&=\int _{a}^{b}f(x)\,dx\\&\sim h\left({\frac {f(x_{1})}{2}}+f(x_{2})+\cdots +f(x_{N-1})+{\frac {f(x_{N})}{2}}\right)+{\frac {h^{2}}{12}}{\bigl }-{\frac {h^{4}}{720}}{\bigl }+\cdots \end{aligned}}}

This may be viewed as an extension of the trapezoid rule by the inclusion of correction terms. Note that this asymptotic expansion is usually not convergent; there is some p, depending upon f and h, such that the terms past order p increase rapidly. Thus, the remainder term generally demands close attention.

The Euler–Maclaurin formula is also used for detailed error analysis in numerical quadrature. It explains the superior performance of the trapezoidal rule on smooth periodic functions and is used in certain extrapolation methods. Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature is essentially a change of variables to cast an arbitrary integral in terms of integrals of periodic functions where the Euler–Maclaurin approach is very accurate (in that particular case the Euler–Maclaurin formula takes the form of a discrete cosine transform). This technique is known as a periodizing transformation.

Asymptotic expansion of sums

In the context of computing asymptotic expansions of sums and series, usually the most useful form of the Euler–Maclaurin formula is n = a b f ( n ) a b f ( x ) d x + f ( b ) + f ( a ) 2 + k = 1 B 2 k ( 2 k ) ! ( f ( 2 k 1 ) ( b ) f ( 2 k 1 ) ( a ) ) , {\displaystyle \sum _{n=a}^{b}f(n)\sim \int _{a}^{b}f(x)\,dx+{\frac {f(b)+f(a)}{2}}+\sum _{k=1}^{\infty }\,{\frac {B_{2k}}{(2k)!}}\left(f^{(2k-1)}(b)-f^{(2k-1)}(a)\right),}

where a and b are integers. Often the expansion remains valid even after taking the limits a → −∞ or b → +∞ or both. In many cases the integral on the right-hand side can be evaluated in closed form in terms of elementary functions even though the sum on the left-hand side cannot. Then all the terms in the asymptotic series can be expressed in terms of elementary functions. For example, k = 0 1 ( z + k ) 2 0 1 ( z + k ) 2 d k = 1 z + 1 2 z 2 + t = 1 B 2 t z 2 t + 1 . {\displaystyle \sum _{k=0}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{(z+k)^{2}}}\sim \underbrace {\int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{(z+k)^{2}}}\,dk} _{={\dfrac {1}{z}}}+{\frac {1}{2z^{2}}}+\sum _{t=1}^{\infty }{\frac {B_{2t}}{z^{2t+1}}}.}

Here the left-hand side is equal to ψ(z), namely the first-order polygamma function defined by

ψ ( 1 ) ( z ) = d 2 d z 2 log Γ ( z ) ; {\displaystyle \psi ^{(1)}(z)={\frac {d^{2}}{dz^{2}}}\log \Gamma (z);}

the gamma function Γ(z) is equal to (z − 1)! when z is a positive integer. This results in an asymptotic expansion for ψ(z). That expansion, in turn, serves as the starting point for one of the derivations of precise error estimates for Stirling's approximation of the factorial function.

Examples

If s is an integer greater than 1 we have: k = 1 n 1 k s 1 s 1 + 1 2 1 ( s 1 ) n s 1 + 1 2 n s + i = 1 B 2 i ( 2 i ) ! [ ( s + 2 i 2 ) ! ( s 1 ) ! ( s + 2 i 2 ) ! ( s 1 ) ! n s + 2 i 1 ] . {\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}{\frac {1}{k^{s}}}\approx {\frac {1}{s-1}}+{\frac {1}{2}}-{\frac {1}{(s-1)n^{s-1}}}+{\frac {1}{2n^{s}}}+\sum _{i=1}{\frac {B_{2i}}{(2i)!}}\left.}

Collecting the constants into a value of the Riemann zeta function, we can write an asymptotic expansion: k = 1 n 1 k s ζ ( s ) 1 ( s 1 ) n s 1 + 1 2 n s i = 1 B 2 i ( 2 i ) ! ( s + 2 i 2 ) ! ( s 1 ) ! n s + 2 i 1 . {\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}{\frac {1}{k^{s}}}\sim \zeta (s)-{\frac {1}{(s-1)n^{s-1}}}+{\frac {1}{2n^{s}}}-\sum _{i=1}{\frac {B_{2i}}{(2i)!}}{\frac {(s+2i-2)!}{(s-1)!n^{s+2i-1}}}.}

For s equal to 2 this simplifies to k = 1 n 1 k 2 ζ ( 2 ) 1 n + 1 2 n 2 i = 1 B 2 i n 2 i + 1 , {\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}{\frac {1}{k^{2}}}\sim \zeta (2)-{\frac {1}{n}}+{\frac {1}{2n^{2}}}-\sum _{i=1}{\frac {B_{2i}}{n^{2i+1}}},} or k = 1 n 1 k 2 π 2 6 1 n + 1 2 n 2 1 6 n 3 + 1 30 n 5 1 42 n 7 + . {\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}{\frac {1}{k^{2}}}\sim {\frac {\pi ^{2}}{6}}-{\frac {1}{n}}+{\frac {1}{2n^{2}}}-{\frac {1}{6n^{3}}}+{\frac {1}{30n^{5}}}-{\frac {1}{42n^{7}}}+\cdots .}

When s = 1, the corresponding technique gives an asymptotic expansion for the harmonic numbers: k = 1 n 1 k γ + log n + 1 2 n k = 1 B 2 k 2 k n 2 k , {\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}{\frac {1}{k}}\sim \gamma +\log n+{\frac {1}{2n}}-\sum _{k=1}^{\infty }{\frac {B_{2k}}{2kn^{2k}}},} where γ ≈ 0.5772... is the Euler–Mascheroni constant.

Proofs

Derivation by mathematical induction

We outline the argument given in Apostol.

The Bernoulli polynomials Bn(x) and the periodic Bernoulli functions Pn(x) for n = 0, 1, 2, ... were introduced above.

The first several Bernoulli polynomials are B 0 ( x ) = 1 , B 1 ( x ) = x 1 2 , B 2 ( x ) = x 2 x + 1 6 , B 3 ( x ) = x 3 3 2 x 2 + 1 2 x , B 4 ( x ) = x 4 2 x 3 + x 2 1 30 , {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}B_{0}(x)&=1,\\B_{1}(x)&=x-{\tfrac {1}{2}},\\B_{2}(x)&=x^{2}-x+{\tfrac {1}{6}},\\B_{3}(x)&=x^{3}-{\tfrac {3}{2}}x^{2}+{\tfrac {1}{2}}x,\\B_{4}(x)&=x^{4}-2x^{3}+x^{2}-{\tfrac {1}{30}},\\&\,\,\,\vdots \end{aligned}}}

The values Bn(1) are the Bernoulli numbers Bn. Notice that for n ≠ 1 we have B n = B n ( 1 ) = B n ( 0 ) , {\displaystyle B_{n}=B_{n}(1)=B_{n}(0),} and for n = 1, B 1 = B 1 ( 1 ) = B 1 ( 0 ) . {\displaystyle B_{1}=B_{1}(1)=-B_{1}(0).}

The functions Pn agree with the Bernoulli polynomials on the interval and are periodic with period 1. Furthermore, except when n = 1, they are also continuous. Thus, P n ( 0 ) = P n ( 1 ) = B n for  n 1. {\displaystyle P_{n}(0)=P_{n}(1)=B_{n}\quad {\text{for }}n\neq 1.}

Let k be an integer, and consider the integral k k + 1 f ( x ) d x = k k + 1 u d v , {\displaystyle \int _{k}^{k+1}f(x)\,dx=\int _{k}^{k+1}u\,dv,} where u = f ( x ) , d u = f ( x ) d x , d v = P 0 ( x ) d x since  P 0 ( x ) = 1 , v = P 1 ( x ) . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}u&=f(x),\\du&=f'(x)\,dx,\\dv&=P_{0}(x)\,dx&{\text{since }}P_{0}(x)&=1,\\v&=P_{1}(x).\end{aligned}}}

Integrating by parts, we get k k + 1 f ( x ) d x = [ u v ] k k + 1 k k + 1 v d u = [ f ( x ) P 1 ( x ) ] k k + 1 k k + 1 f ( x ) P 1 ( x ) d x = B 1 ( 1 ) f ( k + 1 ) B 1 ( 0 ) f ( k ) k k + 1 f ( x ) P 1 ( x ) d x . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\int _{k}^{k+1}f(x)\,dx&={\bigl }_{k}^{k+1}-\int _{k}^{k+1}v\,du\\&={\bigl }_{k}^{k+1}-\int _{k}^{k+1}f'(x)P_{1}(x)\,dx\\&=B_{1}(1)f(k+1)-B_{1}(0)f(k)-\int _{k}^{k+1}f'(x)P_{1}(x)\,dx.\end{aligned}}}

Using B1(0) = −⁠1/2⁠, B1(1) = ⁠1/2⁠, and summing the above from k = 0 to k = n − 1, we get 0 n f ( x ) d x = 0 1 f ( x ) d x + + n 1 n f ( x ) d x = f ( 0 ) 2 + f ( 1 ) + + f ( n 1 ) + f ( n ) 2 0 n f ( x ) P 1 ( x ) d x . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\int _{0}^{n}f(x)\,dx&=\int _{0}^{1}f(x)\,dx+\cdots +\int _{n-1}^{n}f(x)\,dx\\&={\frac {f(0)}{2}}+f(1)+\dotsb +f(n-1)+{\frac {f(n)}{2}}-\int _{0}^{n}f'(x)P_{1}(x)\,dx.\end{aligned}}}

Adding ⁠f(n) − f(0)/2⁠ to both sides and rearranging, we have k = 1 n f ( k ) = 0 n f ( x ) d x + f ( n ) f ( 0 ) 2 + 0 n f ( x ) P 1 ( x ) d x . {\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}f(k)=\int _{0}^{n}f(x)\,dx+{\frac {f(n)-f(0)}{2}}+\int _{0}^{n}f'(x)P_{1}(x)\,dx.}

This is the p = 1 case of the summation formula. To continue the induction, we apply integration by parts to the error term: k k + 1 f ( x ) P 1 ( x ) d x = k k + 1 u d v , {\displaystyle \int _{k}^{k+1}f'(x)P_{1}(x)\,dx=\int _{k}^{k+1}u\,dv,} where u = f ( x ) , d u = f ( x ) d x , d v = P 1 ( x ) d x , v = 1 2 P 2 ( x ) . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}u&=f'(x),\\du&=f''(x)\,dx,\\dv&=P_{1}(x)\,dx,\\v&={\tfrac {1}{2}}P_{2}(x).\end{aligned}}}

The result of integrating by parts is [ u v ] k k + 1 k k + 1 v d u = [ f ( x ) P 2 ( x ) 2 ] k k + 1 1 2 k k + 1 f ( x ) P 2 ( x ) d x = B 2 2 ( f ( k + 1 ) f ( k ) ) 1 2 k k + 1 f ( x ) P 2 ( x ) d x . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\bigl }_{k}^{k+1}-\int _{k}^{k+1}v\,du&=\left_{k}^{k+1}-{\frac {1}{2}}\int _{k}^{k+1}f''(x)P_{2}(x)\,dx\\&={\frac {B_{2}}{2}}(f'(k+1)-f'(k))-{\frac {1}{2}}\int _{k}^{k+1}f''(x)P_{2}(x)\,dx.\end{aligned}}}

Summing from k = 0 to k = n − 1 and substituting this for the lower order error term results in the p = 2 case of the formula, k = 1 n f ( k ) = 0 n f ( x ) d x + f ( n ) f ( 0 ) 2 + B 2 2 ( f ( n ) f ( 0 ) ) 1 2 0 n f ( x ) P 2 ( x ) d x . {\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}f(k)=\int _{0}^{n}f(x)\,dx+{\frac {f(n)-f(0)}{2}}+{\frac {B_{2}}{2}}{\bigl (}f'(n)-f'(0){\bigr )}-{\frac {1}{2}}\int _{0}^{n}f''(x)P_{2}(x)\,dx.}

This process can be iterated. In this way we get a proof of the Euler–Maclaurin summation formula which can be formalized by mathematical induction, in which the induction step relies on integration by parts and on identities for periodic Bernoulli functions.

See also

References

  1. ^ Apostol, T. M. (1 May 1999). "An Elementary View of Euler's Summation Formula". The American Mathematical Monthly. 106 (5). Mathematical Association of America: 409–418. doi:10.2307/2589145. ISSN 0002-9890. JSTOR 2589145.
  2. "Digital Library of Mathematical Functions: Sums and Sequences". National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  3. Lehmer, D. H. (1940). "On the maxima and minima of Bernoulli polynomials". The American Mathematical Monthly. 47 (8): 533–538. doi:10.2307/2303833. JSTOR 2303833.
  4. Pengelley, David J. (2007). "Dances between continuous and discrete: Euler's summation formula". Euler at 300. MAA Spectrum. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. pp. 169–189. arXiv:1912.03527. MR 2349549.
  5. ^ Devries, Paul L.; Hasbrun, Javier E. (2011). A first course in computational physics (2nd ed.). Jones and Bartlett Publishers. p. 156.
  6. Abramowitz, Milton; Stegun, Irene A., eds. (1972). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. New York: Dover Publications. pp. 16, 806, 886. ISBN 978-0-486-61272-0.

Further reading

External links

Leonhard Euler
Calculus
Precalculus
Limits
Differential calculus
Integral calculus
Vector calculus
Multivariable calculus
Sequences and series
Special functions
and numbers
History of calculus
Lists
Integrals
Miscellaneous topics
Categories: