| Revision as of 17:19, 23 April 2007 editPhyschim62 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers33,631 edits →What's going on?: admin comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:23, 23 April 2007 edit undoHkhenson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,526 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| In short, ], i.e. ], started the article in 2005 with a from a 2002 article he wrote. He feels he is the expert on this subject and will not let other views go into the article. The ] summarizes the situation. | In short, ], i.e. ], started the article in 2005 with a from a 2002 article he wrote. He feels he is the expert on this subject and will not let other views go into the article. The ] summarizes the situation. | ||
| :''Admin comment''. There appears to be a content dispute as to what constitutes {{article|capture-bonding}} which has lead to repeated reverting between {{user|Hkhenson}}, who prefers an article based mainly on his own publications, and {{user|Sadi Carnot}}, who prefers a version with a wider base of source material. The revert war has the effect of preventing improvement of the article. ] ] 17:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | :''Admin comment''. There appears to be a content dispute as to what constitutes {{article|capture-bonding}} which has lead to repeated reverting between {{user|Hkhenson}}, who prefers an article based mainly on his own publications, and {{user|Sadi Carnot}}, who prefers a version with a wider base of source material. The revert war has the effect of preventing improvement of the article. ] ] 17:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| I believe this is a biased view of the situation. I stand on my comments on the talk page and in addition would appreciate ] being asked not to delete white space or otherwise edit other posters comments on talk pages as discussed at ]. ] 21:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==== What would you like to change about that? ==== | ==== What would you like to change about that? ==== | ||
Revision as of 21:23, 23 April 2007
| Misplaced Pages Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Status | new |
| Request date | Unknown |
| Requesting party | Unknown |
]]
Request Information
Who are the involved parties?
- User:Hkhenson - someone who wrote a 2002 article on capture bonding, and feels he is the expert on the subject.
- User:Sadi Carnot - someone who is trying to clean and organize all the related articles on human bonding.
What's going on?
In short, Keith Henson, i.e. User:Hkhenson, started the article in 2005 with a paste from a 2002 article he wrote. He feels he is the expert on this subject and will not let other views go into the article. The talk page summarizes the situation.
- Admin comment. There appears to be a content dispute as to what constitutes Capture-bonding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) which has lead to repeated reverting between Hkhenson (talk · contribs), who prefers an article based mainly on his own publications, and Sadi Carnot (talk · contribs), who prefers a version with a wider base of source material. The revert war has the effect of preventing improvement of the article. Physchim62 (talk) 17:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
I believe this is a biased view of the situation. I stand on my comments on the talk page and in addition would appreciate User:Sadi Carnot being asked not to delete white space or otherwise edit other posters comments on talk pages as discussed at User_talk:Hkhenson. Keith Henson 21:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
What would you like to change about that?
Mediation Cabal, please review the situation at article capture-bonding and give your opinion.