Revision as of 14:18, 22 January 2023 view sourceLuxtaythe2nd (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,351 edits Adding short description: "Proposal for peace between Israel and Palestine"Tag: Shortdesc helper← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 19:12, 23 October 2024 view source Jlwoodwa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers75,958 edits Add categorization templates (via redirect-helper) |
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
⚫ |
#REDIRECT ] |
|
{{Short description|Proposal for peace between Israel and Palestine}} |
|
|
{{pp-30-500|small=yes}} |
|
|
{{Cleanup rewrite|date=November 2021|the ACPR proposal is barely notable, and the Isocracy one is non-notable, but this term is notable because of its use in media and academia (see also "no-state solution")}} |
|
|
{{Israel-Palestinian peace process}} |
|
|
In the context of the ], a '''zero-state solution''', based on a proposal by the {{ill|Ariel Center for Policy Research|he|מרכז אריאל למחקרי מדיניות}} (ACPR), assumes that there is no unique Palestinian identity and that the ] in the ] should get "restoration of ]ian ]" while Egypt should have responsibility for the ]. ] thus has no reason to agree to assimilate them or provide them with a state, since they were part of those countries until their territory was captured in the 1967 ]. This proposal is very similar to the ] advocated by some commentators. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell| |
|
==Overview == |
|
|
|
{{R with history}} |
|
The approach generally assumes that Israel will expand to fill the ] in 1967. Specific proposals differ as whether the present Palestinians can remain where they are, as non-citizens of Israel, or are expected to return to the territory of their national identity. |
|
|
|
{{R with Wikidata item}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
There has been opposition to this plan from Palestinians, Jordanians and Egyptians.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/world/middleeast/12egypt.html|title=Gaza Crisis Imperils 2-State Solution|first=Michael|last=Slackman|date=16 December 2017|publisher=|via=NYTimes.com}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
The proposal by ACPR, the "Framework Proposal for a National Strategy Regarding Judea and Samaria and the Issue of Eretz Israel Arabs", describes an objective of "Consolidating a political proposal with the intention of halting Israel's defeatist campaign that is manifest in its most extreme form in the conduct of the Olmert Government". It assumes that there is no unique Palestinian identity and that the Palestinians in the West Bank should get "restoration of Jordanian citizenship" while Egypt should have responsibility for the Gaza Strip. It proposes a unilateral solution because it does not believe ] will accept: |
|
|
|
|
|
* Extending Israeli sovereignty over the ] |
|
|
* "] is ]" and restoration of Jordanian citizenship to the Arabs in the West Bank |
|
|
* Municipal autonomy for the Arabs of the West Bank (on the basis of the Camp David Accords) accompanied by a total disarmament of the autonomous areas |
|
|
* The areas of Arab settlements located on private property (the Mosaic Program by Dr. Yuval Arnon Ohanna) |
|
|
* Military liquidation of the military infrastructure in Gaza and according responsibility for the area to Egypt |
|
|
* ]: Equal rights in exchange for equal obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
== See also == |
|
|
|
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
⚫ |
* ] |
|
|
|
|
|
==References== |
|
|
{{Reflist}} |
|
|
{{Citizendium}} |
|
|
|
|
|
==External links== |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|