| Revision as of 21:01, 5 May 2006 editONUnicorn (talk | contribs)Administrators19,805 editsm →Main Picture: I wasn't logged in.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:57, 27 October 2024 edit undoMcSly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers32,216 edits Undid revision 1253704031 by 199.247.182.48 (talk) Not a WP:FORUMTag: Undo | ||
| (138 intermediate revisions by 81 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Talk header}} | |||
| {{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= | |||
| {{WikiProject Anthropology |importance=Mid }} | |||
| {{WikiProject Health and fitness |importance=High}} | |||
| {{WikiProject Transport}} | |||
| }} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| | algo = old(181d) | |||
| | archive = Talk:Walking/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| | counter = 1 | |||
| | maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| }} | |||
| {{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/University_of_California_Riverside/Evolution_of_the_First_Hominids_(Winter) | assignments = ] | reviewers = ], ], ] | start_date = 2022-01-03 | end_date = 2022-03-11 }} | |||
| ==Walking== | ==Walking== | ||
| The reference to walking with crutches is more misleading than anything: firstly it assumes underarm/axillary crutches, which are little used in major parts of the world (I can't remember the last time I saw a European using anything but forearm crutches), equally permanent users across the developed world, including the US, tend to use forearm crutches and generally won't use the described gait (which is either swing-to or swing-through depending on whether the feet are brought up to or past the crutches. More common is a three-point (crutches, left leg, right leg) or four point (right crutch, left leg, left crutch, right leg) gait. DWG, 5 Feb 2006 | The reference to walking with crutches is more misleading than anything: firstly it assumes underarm/axillary crutches, which are little used in major parts of the world (I can't remember the last time I saw a European using anything but forearm crutches), equally permanent users across the developed world, including the US, tend to use forearm crutches and generally won't use the described gait (which is either swing-to or swing-through depending on whether the feet are brought up to or past the crutches. More common is a three-point (crutches, left leg, right leg) or four point (right crutch, left leg, left crutch, right leg) gait. DWG, 5 Feb 2006 | ||
| ⚫ | ==Alternative medicine== | ||
| ==Walking speeds== | |||
| There's nothing here about the average speeds of walking on | |||
| various terrain. I'd like to know this. | |||
| I am an avid ] (that means I like to walk in wilderness areas, typically on trails and up and down hills or mountains) and a competent English speaker. From this article, I couldn't tell what you meant by "walking"--I mean, it would really help if you would explain exactly what happens, where you go, what you do, etc., when you are "walking" in the sense you describe here. --] | |||
| ::<small>undated comment above by ] 16:44, 12 September 2001</small> | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| The latest addition encapsulating walking within Alternative Health is not very convincing. There are, of course, health benefits to walking but there are plenty of reasons for walking which have nothing to do with health, for example, it is a form of ]. Would the health enthusiast care to reconsider... | The latest addition encapsulating walking within Alternative Health is not very convincing. There are, of course, health benefits to walking but there are plenty of reasons for walking which have nothing to do with health, for example, it is a form of ]. Would the health enthusiast care to reconsider... | ||
| Line 18: | Line 24: | ||
| ::PS The correct spelling of "Complimentary medicine" should be "Complementary medicine" | ::PS The correct spelling of "Complimentary medicine" should be "Complementary medicine" | ||
| ::-- ] 09:07, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC) | ::-- ] 09:07, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC) | ||
| ::: If someone put in more about the health benefits or otherwise of walking it might make sense. At the monement I don't see that it does.] 22:42, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC) | ::: If someone put in more about the health benefits or otherwise of walking it might make sense. At the monement I don't see that it does.] 22:42, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC) | ||
| : |
:I suggest that we remove the references to alternative medicine from the bottom of the article until someone cares enough to write something to actually link it in to the article; as it stands, the alt-med links at the bottom are wholly divorced from the article, and so are inappropriate. I have neither the expertise, nor time and inclination, to do so myslef... | ||
| : |
:] ] 13:45, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| ⚫ | ==Robotics== | ||
| Should this page have any reference to efforts to get robots to walk? It is a non-trivial problem, and one that hasn't been completely solved yet. | Should this page have any reference to efforts to get robots to walk? It is a non-trivial problem, and one that hasn't been completely solved yet. | ||
| == |
==References== | ||
| {{reflist}} | |||
| a) As per a question on the ], why do people swing their arms whilst walking? | |||
| b) Yes, there should be a section on getting robots to walk - could anyone contribute to this? | |||
| c) Are there any good diagrams of walking motion available? Perhaps an animated gif? | |||
| d) Info on the muscles used in walking would be good. | |||
| I think this is a really good option for the ], as there's a lot that could be done on this article that has not yet been done, and it's quite an important area in human development. And if I knew the answers to the above suggestions myself, I would add them. ]<small> ] ]</small> 16:52, 15 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The segment in section 2 stating <cite>"Others have major flaws in their urban planning and public transit that leaves them entirely dependent on the automobile and fossil fuels, being a major cause of global warming and extreme weather events."</cite> seems to me to be rather biased, or at least of an unnecessarily condemming tone. ] 23:49 07 January 2006 | |||
| == Main Picture == | |||
| I like the fact that the main picture gives a good idea of what it looks like to walk, but I think there are several problems with that picture; 1. It's too small. Its size makes it very difficult to see clearly without clicking to enlarge it or plastering your nose to the computer screen. 2. She's naked. It's not pornographic, and one DOES expect to see nudes in articles about the body or art, but I think the nudity is unnecessary in THIS ARTICLE. 3. She's going down stairs, and it might be better to have something that shows a person walking on a flat surface, as the process is a little different. Perhaps something better could be found? Additionally, it would be nice to have some pictures that illustrate how things other than humans walk. Perhaps horses (4 legs) and insects (6, or even 8 legs). What do others think? ] 21:01, 5 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:57, 27 October 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Walking article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 January 2022 and 11 March 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cornyon (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Acont061, Eric Heldt, Jpete17.
Walking
The reference to walking with crutches is more misleading than anything: firstly it assumes underarm/axillary crutches, which are little used in major parts of the world (I can't remember the last time I saw a European using anything but forearm crutches), equally permanent users across the developed world, including the US, tend to use forearm crutches and generally won't use the described gait (which is either swing-to or swing-through depending on whether the feet are brought up to or past the crutches. More common is a three-point (crutches, left leg, right leg) or four point (right crutch, left leg, left crutch, right leg) gait. DWG, 5 Feb 2006
Alternative medicine
The latest addition encapsulating walking within Alternative Health is not very convincing. There are, of course, health benefits to walking but there are plenty of reasons for walking which have nothing to do with health, for example, it is a form of transport. Would the health enthusiast care to reconsider...
- Every article can be classsified more than one way. So, it is with a lot of mainstream activities like exercise and diet. They are part of natural approaches to health such as Natural hygiene which is classified alternative medicine. I have replaced the orange box with one that doesn't even look like a box. -- John Gohde 07:40, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- John, this is certainly an improvement. However, whether it is a box or not, my point is that the extended reference to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is inappropriate. I do not readily accept the argument that since every article can be cross-referenced in more than one way this entitles a proponent for one of these ways to make a "land grab" for the topic. On that argument, we could anticipate banner cross-references cluttering up the page from every sort of enthusiast. I advocate moderation and discretion in promoting your links. For example, how about suitable links to Health as well as CAM? I am a supporter of CAM but I do not believe that it should be cross-referenced in this way. The reasons for my opinion are :firstly, the reference is unnecessarily large especially in relation to the overall size of the preceding text. One gets the impression that one is reading an entry in some faddish health advertising-supported website rather than an encyclopaedia. Secondly, the reference itself includes subreferences to major topics such as philosophy and history which is (a) misleading since they refer only to the philosophy and history of CAM (as opposed to philosophy and history in general or the philosophy and history of walking) (b) unnecessary since if the interested reader wants to find out about these topics they can follow the link from the main CAM page.
- I suggest that we remove the references to alternative medicine from the bottom of the article until someone cares enough to write something to actually link it in to the article; as it stands, the alt-med links at the bottom are wholly divorced from the article, and so are inappropriate. I have neither the expertise, nor time and inclination, to do so myslef...
- James F. (talk) 13:45, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Robotics
Should this page have any reference to efforts to get robots to walk? It is a non-trivial problem, and one that hasn't been completely solved yet.
References
Categories:- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class Anthropology articles
- Mid-importance Anthropology articles
- B-Class Health and fitness articles
- High-importance Health and fitness articles
- WikiProject Health and fitness articles
- B-Class Transport articles
- Unknown-importance Transport articles
- WikiProject Transport articles