| Revision as of 14:04, 13 July 2004 editAcegikmo1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,391 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:28, 28 October 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,683 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:William S. Burroughs/Archive 3) (bot |
| (410 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{talk header}} |
|
I (]) removed: |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Burroughs, William S.|1= |
|
:"Perhaps his great legacy has been in the creative inspiration he has offered to writers, musicians and those in the visual arts." |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-priority=High|a&e-work-group=yes}} |
|
(yes, and maybe it's in his books, or in his dress sense, or, or...) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Poetry|importance=high}} |
|
:"Nothing is true. Everything is permitted." |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Mid}} |
|
(this is Bill quoting the final words of ]) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies|person=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Missouri|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject St. Louis|importance=mid|wg=culture}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
| algo = old(365d) |
|
|
| archive = Talk:William S. Burroughs/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
| counter = 3 |
|
|
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
| minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== the apolitical outlook of burroughs == |
|
---- |
|
|
Moved this ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i get the feeling comments on burroughs politics are made by people that have not actually read his work, at least with any genuine interest. he was more interested in the visual arts, poetry, literature, the occult, science, then any kind of coherent political stance. what is said on this page is conjecture based on other things he has said that were not intrinsically political. |
|
"If you like Burroughs, or if you <i>almost</i> like Burroughs but he's a little strong for you, you may also want to take a look at |
|
|
]." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
he never espoused coherent political convictions. the vague conjectures of him being to the right is not consistent with other things he has said, like his dislike of philistinism, bourgeois ethics, orthodoxy, consumer culture. he was always subversive. he was more philosophical than political, more interested in the bigger human questions not so much on what the right policy. although anyone from 1960 reading this would be in disbelief as at the time nixon was crusading the drug war, etc. ] (]) 02:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
---- |
|
|
|
:I disagree that Burroughs was 'to the right' also, but I think it would be a mistake in general to try to describe him as 'right wing', 'left wing', or even apolitical, and that a lot of things that he did hold interest and write on were intrinsically political. As politics are concerned when writing about Burroughs I think the take in this article should be to only discuss specific things that have been said instead of trying to attribute any over arching view. ]] 17:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
And now I've removed this: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Influence on popular culture == |
|
:''Most famous for his 'Thanksgiving Prayer' and the verse "Kill a Queer for Christ".'' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burroughs is frequently referenced, sometimes explicitly, in popular culture and there seems to be no mention of it in this article. To begin with, there are numerous band names - Steely Dan, Soft Machine, and numerous others that are Burroughs references. The term "Blade Runner" also has its origins in Burroughs work, albeit, it had a very different meaning from what the scriptwriters of the film turned it into. Nevertheless, if I'm not mistaken, some royalties had to be paid to Burroughs for use of the name. In addition, Burroughs seems to have had some role in coining the term "Heavy Metal", though he wasn't referring to a musical genre. I think this topic merits a subsection under "Legacy". ] (]) 19:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
Because, well, he isn't - if he's "most famous" for anything, it's probably ''Naked Lunch''. Besides which, "Thanks for 'Kill a Queer for Christ' stickers" is a line in "Thanksgiving Prayer", not a separate piece (and yes, he was being ironic, just in case anybody thinks all those drugs made him go a bit funny in his old age...). I suppose the Prayer could be mentioned somewhere in the article, but I could't see a simple way to fit it in, so I've just taken it out - I don't think it's a great loss, because it's really quite obscure as far as I'm aware (I'm not sure it's even been published in print, it was just a track on his ''Dead City Radio'' record, I think). --] |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
Removed - ''where he lived for the next twenty-four years'' as it is completely false. Burroughs lived in Paris, the UK and New York AS WELL as in Tangiers during the aforementioned period (1952-1976). ] 20:02, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
--] 14:16, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
Added 'Word Virus' to the bibliography since it contains previously unpublished material. Added some notes about Junky/Junkie that could be tidier - not clear which edition the ISBN refers to. |
|
|
|
|
|
also... |
|
|
|
|
|
It's 'Naked Lunch', not ''''The''' Naked Lunch'. The latter (correct me if I'm wrong) is the title of the film by David Cronenberg. If someone with more time and experience could move the page and all references? |
|
|
|
|
|
:Actually, I think they both lack a "The". I'll see about moving stuff around now. --] |
|
|
|
|
|
:Done (more or less). --] |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
--] 17:17, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
I'm considering revising and expanding this page. There are a few inconsistencies and errors that I've spotted, and I for one would like Misplaced Pages to contain more info on "The only American novelist who may conceivably be possessed by genius" (quote by Norman Mailer). Were he alive today, there's a fair chance that the old bugger'd be an enthusiastic Misplaced Pages user. |
|
|
|
|
|
Who's up for helping? I'd rather have an edit war than go it alone. |
|
|
|
|
|
== The Definitive (?) article on The Definite Article == |
|
|
|
|
|
--] 06:40, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
Well (deep breath) off the top of my head (without checking the massive WSB archive) this is how I understand it - |
|
|
|
|
|
It depends where you are - It was ''''The''' Naked Lunch' on first publication in Paris (by Maurice Girodias) - |
|
|
When Barney Rossett bought it for Grove Press, they suppressed the definite article and did some minor typo revisions and then appended 'Deposition' and 'postscript' to make the work more overtly anti-drugs. The dropping of the definite article may have been to obfuscate legal proceedings (Girodias claimed foreign language rights) or it may have been to frustrate customs authroities (who were wont to sort stop-lists with leading articles - a practice any librarian could've told them was dumb - could've but didn't! |
|
|
|
|
|
Later, when John Calder put out NL in the UK he used the article (I believe he always got on better with Girodias than Rossett, and that his edition was (originally at least) 'by arrangement'). |
|
|
|
|
|
When Cronenberg made his travesty of film (no worse than any of his others) he used the US title of the book in all territories inna kinda culture-imperialist stylee. |
|
|
|
|
|
So what do we have : |
|
|
Film in all countries: NO article | |
|
|
Book in France: YES (but only in english language - french language editions drop it!) | |
|
|
Book in US : NO | |
|
|
Book in UK : YES | |
|
|
|
|
|
quite simple really... |
|
|
more info in: ''Naked Lunch : The Restored Text'' (NY:Grove Weidenfeld, 2001) |
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, the contents of the book have remained constant (front and end matter only being varied) - the next two of the 'paris' trilogy (''The Soft Machine'' and ''Ticket'' significantly vary contents across editions, but keep constant titles). |
|
|
|
|
|
So, a case can be made that: aside from his massive acknowledged influence on music, William Burroughs also invented remixology. |
|
|
|
|
|
PS no endorsement of WSB should be assumed - I don't like the dude so much. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
"A book so intense can only be adored or hated & no-one who reads it is ever the same again" - I'm concerned this is just an opinion of a single user, can we remove this line? |
|
|
--] 06:07, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I tried bringing the contributions added in that edit to a neutral point of view. What do you think of the text now? |
|
|
|
|
|
:] 13:29, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Much better. This line also bugs me = "His hobbies included guys". Is that a legitimate hobby :)? I'm sure the humourist in Burrough's would say so, but it doesn't quite read correctly. |
|
|
::--] 13:57, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Well, I don't think it's ''il''legitimate. But I agree that it's not worded properly for an encyclopaedia. Do you have any suggestion for improvement? |
|
|
|
|
|
:::] 14:04, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
|
i get the feeling comments on burroughs politics are made by people that have not actually read his work, at least with any genuine interest. he was more interested in the visual arts, poetry, literature, the occult, science, then any kind of coherent political stance. what is said on this page is conjecture based on other things he has said that were not intrinsically political.
he never espoused coherent political convictions. the vague conjectures of him being to the right is not consistent with other things he has said, like his dislike of philistinism, bourgeois ethics, orthodoxy, consumer culture. he was always subversive. he was more philosophical than political, more interested in the bigger human questions not so much on what the right policy. although anyone from 1960 reading this would be in disbelief as at the time nixon was crusading the drug war, etc. Shhsbavavaa (talk) 02:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Burroughs is frequently referenced, sometimes explicitly, in popular culture and there seems to be no mention of it in this article. To begin with, there are numerous band names - Steely Dan, Soft Machine, and numerous others that are Burroughs references. The term "Blade Runner" also has its origins in Burroughs work, albeit, it had a very different meaning from what the scriptwriters of the film turned it into. Nevertheless, if I'm not mistaken, some royalties had to be paid to Burroughs for use of the name. In addition, Burroughs seems to have had some role in coining the term "Heavy Metal", though he wasn't referring to a musical genre. I think this topic merits a subsection under "Legacy". Peter G Werner (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
