Revision as of 15:13, 26 October 2024 editZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,422 edits Creating FAR | Revision as of 13:06, 28 October 2024 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,456 edits what was the point of this?Next edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{Featured article tools|1=Trafford Park}}</noinclude> | {{Featured article tools|1=Trafford Park}}</noinclude> | ||
<!-- Please don't edit anything above here. Be sure to include your reasons for nominating below. --> | <!-- Please don't edit anything above here. Be sure to include your reasons for nominating below. --> | ||
:<small>''Notified: ], |
:<small>''Notified: ], ], ], ], ''</small> | ||
I am nominating this featured article for review because there are uncited statements and paragraphs, the lead is long and could be better formatted. The "Current and future transport" and "Political representation" sections are underdeveloped, and the "History" section stops at 2008. There is no "Demographics" section, although I do not know if this is possible to obtain from census or other data. ] (]) 15:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC) | I am nominating this featured article for review because there are uncited statements and paragraphs, the lead is long and could be better formatted. The "Current and future transport" and "Political representation" sections are underdeveloped, and the "History" section stops at 2008. There is no "Demographics" section, although I do not know if this is possible to obtain from census or other data. ] (]) 15:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:06, 28 October 2024
Trafford Park
Trafford Park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
As of 28 December 2024, 18:13 (UTC), this page is active and open for discussion. A FAR coordinator will advance or close this nomination when consensus is reached.Toolbox |
---|
- Notified: Parrot of Doom, Eric Corbett, WikiProject Greater Manchester, WikiProject UK geography, 06-08-2024
I am nominating this featured article for review because there are uncited statements and paragraphs, the lead is long and could be better formatted. The "Current and future transport" and "Political representation" sections are underdeveloped, and the "History" section stops at 2008. There is no "Demographics" section, although I do not know if this is possible to obtain from census or other data. Z1720 (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)