Misplaced Pages

Talk:Muchu Chhish: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:12, 10 October 2023 editRedWolf (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators94,808 edits start class← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:53, 28 October 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,250,031 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Mountains}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= {{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Pakistan|importance=start|class=stub|Gilgit=yes}} {{WikiProject Pakistan|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Mountains|class=start|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Mountains|importance=Low}}
}} }}


Latest revision as of 14:53, 28 October 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconPakistan Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMountains Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dagestani reddit user is claiming they made it

Around 10 September 2023 a reddit user from Dagestan claimed that his expedition made the summit. They have a number of pictures and videos that seem to lend credence to their claim. MyIP19216811 (talk) 04:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Someone keeps editing it back to say "unclimbed" despite the photos and videos posted on reddit and mountaineering talk boards 192.0.182.43 (talk) 15:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
A reddit post isn't a reliable source. See WP:UGC which lists reddit as an example of an unacceptable user-generated source. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
No buzzkill about it. I agree it is unverified until they publish it somewhere legit. Best wishes to them. MyIP19216811 (talk) 15:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Sorry to be a buzzkill, but it's just a couple of videos that don't show much background, with gear that seems suspiciously light for the conditions they claim to have encountered. Could be... many places that aren't Muchu Chhish. Not to mention that there are quite a few details that don't quite add up. Could be a not-that-experienced, non-English-speaking mountaineer barely communicating on Gilgit wifi, could be a hoax. The original poster has mentioned that they've emailed the AAJ, and a couple other mountaineering news sources have also expressed interest, so if it's not a hoax, it'll likely be verified by them in the following months. 86.124.148.88 (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
not sure how reliable this source is, but just to add more info : (the article says "confirmation still pending" though so I think it would be premature to add anything to the Wiki page).WanderingTrad (talk) 06:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
That article doesn´t seem to contain anything beyond information contained in the redit posts. It´s likely the author of that article doesn´t have any information beyond the reddit posts. Doesn´t even feature topo of the alleged route. 94.112.64.47 (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
No one who says that is ever sorry to be a buzzkill, lol.
We will await verification, and we'll be happy that you can no longer be able buzzkill. 38.147.229.99 (talk) 17:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

The claimed ascent has been debunked: . Personally, I feel that when somebody claims to have climbed a mountain, but none of their photos resemble that mountain, we should be sceptical. bobrayner (talk) 11:32, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Categories: