Revision as of 00:50, 24 August 2021 editChesdovi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users22,098 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:50, 4 November 2024 edit undoMonkbot (talk | contribs)Bots3,695,952 editsm Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);Tag: AWB | ||
(91 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header|search=yes}} | {{Talk header|search=yes}} | ||
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=a-i}} | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|living=no|listas=Shach, Elazar|1= | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Lithuania|importance=low}} | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Judaism|importance=Mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Israel|importance=mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Biography|needs-photo=y|s&a-work-group = y|s&a-priority = Low|politician-work-group = y|politician-priority =Mid}} | |||
|living=no | |||
|class= B | |||
|needs-photo=y | |||
|listas=Shach, Elazar | |||
|s&a-work-group = y | |||
|s&a-priority = Low | |||
|politician-work-group = y | |||
|politician-priority =Mid | |||
}} | }} | ||
}} | |||
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=30|dounreplied=yes}} | |||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | ||
|target=Talk:Elazar Shach/Archive index | |target=Talk:Elazar Shach/Archive index | ||
Line 30: | Line 21: | ||
|archive = Talk:Elazar Shach/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Talk:Elazar Shach/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{reflist}} | |||
== External links modified == | |||
==Yeshiva University - unexplained deletion?== | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
{{user|Winchester2313}} presumably accuses ''me'' of an , yet the diffs reveal that he himself removed the expanded text on Yeshiva University. The original text had: | |||
<blockquote>'''Joseph B. Soloveitchik''' | |||
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111205073533/http://5tjt.com/local-news/11146-dreams to http://www.5tjt.com/local-news/11146-dreams | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050302143513/http://www.ourjerusalem.com/news/story/news20011106a.html to http://www.ourjerusalem.com/news/story/news20011106a.html | |||
In a lengthy attack on Joseph B. Soloveitchik (d. 1993) of Yeshiva University, Shach accused him of writing "things that are forbidden to hear", as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy". | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
'''The Modern Orthodox and Yeshiva University ''' | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
Shach wrote that Yeshiva University (YU) type institutions are an entirely negative phenomenon posing a threat to the very endurance of authentic Judaism. Shach said that these modern conceptions were "an absolute disaster, causing the destruction of our Holy Torah. Even the so-called 'Touro College' in the USA is a terrible disaster, a ' churban ha-das ' (destruction of the Jewish religion)..."<sup></sup> Shach further writes that the success of those people who were able to achieve greatness in Torah despite their involvement in secular studies are "ma'aseh satan" (the work of the satanic forces), for the existence of such role models will entice others to follow suit, only to be doomed.<sup></sup></blockquote> | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 21:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
My amended version merged these two paragraphs under a section titled "Modern Orthodoxy" as follows: | |||
<blockquote>Shach wrote that Modern Orthodox Yeshiva University type institutions were a threat to authentic Judaism. Shach called them "an absolute disaster, causing the destruction of our Holy Torah. Even the so-called 'Touro College' in the USA is a terrible disaster, a ' churban ha-das ' (destruction of the Jewish religion)..."<sup></sup> He felt that the success of people who achieved greatness in Torah despite involvement in secular studies was the work of the "satanic forces."<sup></sup> Shach accused Joseph B. Soloveitchik of Yeshiva University of writing "things that are forbidden to hear",<sup></sup> as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy".<sup></sup></blockquote> | |||
On 6 September 2021, ] adding in its place:<blockquote>In a lengthy attack on Joseph B. Soloveitchik (d. 1993) of Yeshiva University, Shach accused him of writing "things that are forbidden to hear",<sup></sup> as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy".<sup></sup></blockquote> | |||
only to re-add the missing YU text soon after claiming it was an , when in fact he removed it himself under the guise of ''"restoring longstanding and properly sourced version"''. (NB. here "properly sourced" = ]) What is ] playing at? ] (]) 23:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
:I simply restored the longstanding text by copying the earlier (pre-revisionist) version. Shach's ] was largely on account of his frequent infamous attacks on other leading rabbis and groups, as evidenced by the majority of his mentions in sources meeting ]. ] (]) 04:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
== This page needs to be cleaned up == | |||
::You also simply removed it without releasing what you had removed, something you seem very prone to and I view as a form of ]. But never mind.... Now, please provide ] for your claim that Shach's notability stems from his attacks. Notwithstanding, we do not list them here like this in such an unseemly fashion. ] (]) 15:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
==Lead - Preparation area== | |||
There is a lot of irrelevant information that is just copied from one or two hagiography's written about the subject. Apart from the obvious issue of this not being encyclopedic nor being necessarily reliably sourced, it's also a copyright violation which needs to be removed or corrected. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:14, 3 September 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
'''Elazar Menachem Man Shach''' ({{langx|he|אלעזר מנחם מן שך}}) (January 1, 1899 – November 2, 2001) was a leading ] ] of the non-Hasidic ] of ] who served as ] of ] in ]. | |||
: We can ] the source. No need to remove it to avoid copyvio issues. ] (]) 19:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
Born in ], he escaped the impending ] after immigrating to ] where he continued his teaching career. In 1954 he took up position as one of three ] of the prestigious Ponevezh Yeshiva, along with rabbis ] and ]. Recognised for his Torah scholarship, he authored ''Avi Ezri'', a comprehensive four-volume work on ]' '']'' and eventually became a spiritual mentor to hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Jews.<ref name=SharonJ>Jeremy Sharon. (January 26, 2021). , ''Jerusalem Post''.</ref> | |||
== Preface == | |||
Considered one of Israel's most influential rabbis<ref>(March 25, 2009). , ''The Times''.</ref> and the undisputed leader of Lithuanian Jews in Israel from the mid-1970s until his death<ref> | |||
The current preface reads as follows and has been in place for the best part of seven years: | |||
Leon Mock. '''', ], 2021. pg. 246.</ref> he co-headed the ], was chairman of ] and was patron to hundreds of institutions and organisations around the world,<ref>Shlomo Lorincz. , pg. 282. Feldheim Publishers, 2008.</ref> including many yeshivas he established for Sephardim.<ref>Shahar Ilan. , ''Haaretz''. Nov. 4, 2001</ref> Seen as the successor of the ],<ref>Tuvia Friling. , Brandeis University Press, 2014. pg. 255. "This Rabbi Soloveitchik was also a great admirer of Rabbi Elazar Menachem Shach, the Hazon Ish's successor as the acknowledged leader of a large part of the Israeli Haredi community...".</ref> he was held in high esteem among large portions of the non-Hasidic Ashkenazi community over whom he was able to dominate and impose his will, an attribute lacking in today's divided and factional rabbinic leadership.<ref name=SharonJ/> | |||
His uncompromising stance and strong conservative opinions often led to controversy, prompting opponents to label him a "Jewish ]".<ref name=Guardian061101>Lawrence Joffe. (November 06, 2001). , ''The Guardian''</ref> He was at forefront of a bitter struggle against ] and often railed against the secularism of Israeli society.<ref name=AP050221>Anshel Pfeffer. (Feb. 5, 2021). , ''Haaretz''.</ref> In favour of giving up ], he was seen as a political dove and fiercely opposed the establishment of Jewish settlements in the West Bank.<ref>Ariel Handel, Marco Allegra, Erez Maggor. , pg. 117. Indiana University Press. (2017)</reF> | |||
<blockquote>'''Elazar Menachem Man Shach''' ({{lang-he|אלעזר מנחם מן שך}}, Elazar Shach; January 1, 1899 ] – November 2, 2001) was a leading ] ] ] in ], ]. He also served as one of three ] of the ] in Bnei Brak, along with Rabbis ] and ]. Due to his differences with the ] leadership of the ] in 1984, he ], with whom he founded the ] party. Later, in 1988, Shach sharply criticized ], saying that, "] are not yet ready for leadership positions",<ref name="ReferenceB">'Haaretz' daily newspaper, Shachar Ilan, November 2, 2001</ref> and subsequently ] political party representing ] (non-Hasidic) ] in the Israeli ].</blockquote> | |||
Although ideologically opposed to Zionism, he was instrumental in founding two Israeli political parties (] in 1984 representing ], and ] in 1988 representing ] ]) which won disproportionate state funds for ] and other orthodox institutions.<ref name=Guardian061101/> In 1990, he emerged as a political kingmaker when he prevented religious parties joining a left-wing government on the grounds that ] was "]".<ref name=Guardian061101/> | |||
I am wondering why my more comprehensive summary, below, of Rabbi Schach's life has been reverted? | |||
===Comments=== | |||
<blockquote>'''Elazar Menachem Man Shach''' ({{lang-he|אלעזר מנחם מן שך}}) (January 1, 1899 – November 2, 2001) was a leading ] ] of the non-Hassidic ] of ] who served as ] of ] in ]. | |||
This proposed rewrite does nothing to improve on the existing version - on the contrary, it actually replaces key contextual information and details from high quality sources with an overly lengthy and poorly sourced ramble by one editor. There is no reason to replace the existing, longstanding ''consensus'' version with this proposed sanitized version which runs afoul of ], ], ] and ]. ] (]) 04:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
:Please explain why it "runs afoul of ], ], ] and ]." Don't just keep plastering these WP:GULDILINES every time. You are not grappling with the issues at hand. You write here that the current LEAD contains "high quality sources." It contains one: '''Haaretz' daily newspaper, Shachar Ilan, November 2, 2001''. Your comments here are nonsensical. You are wasting my time. ] (]) 15:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
It seems quite clear that a certain editor is actually an activist committed to forcing their revisions onto this page with a view to creating a distorted narrative about it's highly controversial subject, rather than actually achieving ]. This is obviously disruptive editing and does not improve the page in any way. | |||
Born in ], he escaped the impending ] after immigrating to ] where he continued his teaching career. In 1954 he took up position as one of three ] of the prestigious Ponevezh Yeshiva, along with rabbis ] and ]. Recognised for his Torah scholarship, he authored a four-volume Talmud commentary and eventually became a spiritual mentor to hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Jews. Held in high esteem among large portions of his constituency, he was able to dominate and impose his will over the non-Hassidic Ashkenazi community, an attribute lacking in today's divided and factional rabbinic leadership.<ref>Jeremy Sharon. (January 26, 2021). , ''Jerusalem Post''.</ref> His uncompromising stance and strong conservative opinions often led to controversy, prompting opponents to label him a "Jewish ]".<ref name=Guardian061101>Lawrence Joffe. (November 06, 2001). , ''The Guardian''</ref> He was at forefront of a bitter struggle against ] and often railed against the secularism of Israeli society, his "rabbits and pigs speech" being described as a "pivotal moment in Israeli history".<ref>Anshel Pfeffer. (Feb. 5, 2021). , ''Haaretz''.</ref> | |||
The lead as well as the page in general is actually ] in it's present (and longstanding form), as opposed to the proposed 'sanitized' version. If ] insists on turning this page into a battleground, it's clear that an ANI will have to be the next stop, and I feel that perhaps a page block would be the appropriate remedy. ] (]) 06:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
He was instrumental in founding two Israeli political parties (] in 1984 representing ], and ] in 1988 representing ] ]) which won disproportionate state funds for ] and other orthodox institutions.<ref name=Guardian061101/> In 1990, he emerged as a political kingmaker when he prevented religious parties joining a left-wing government on the grounds that ] was "]".<ref name=Guardian061101/></blockquote> | |||
:It is impossible to reach "consensus" when you refuse to be specific about what precisely is unbalanced, distorted and disruptive. I totally reject your accusations. 1. The article in its current form is not balanced. 2. that the page has been longstanding in its current form is simply not an argument. 3. what is being "distorted" and how? 4. describing the subject as "highly controversial" as a reason for stifling further editing is really not helpful. 6. That my additions with numerous sourced citations is described by you as "not improving the page in any way" is just disgusting. ] (]) 11:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
A simple look at the google search results or even google news results will show that the article on Wiipedia for Shach actually grossly exaggerates his notability. Compare the following well known Orthodox Jewish 20th century rabbis: | |||
Comments, please. ] (]) 21:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
] - google results = 244,000 | |||
] - google results = 330,000 | |||
] google results = 336,000 | |||
] google results = 219,000 | |||
] google results = 121,000 | |||
] google results = 39,000 | |||
A look at the pitiful google news results for Elazar Shach make this even clearer with 189 results compared to 2360 for Moshe Feinstein, 5620 for Ovadia Yosef or 7180 for Menachem Schneerson. It is patently absurd for this article to be aggressively stuffed with references to every person he supposedly met while in one yeshiva or another. This reeks of a very transparent attempt to artificially exaggerate his notability by supposed association with more notable figures. The article as it reads now needs trimming, not more stuffing. Also, the issues with citing from the Yated and their writers moonlighting at similarly transparent partisan publications where we're treated to stories about the wunderkind who "reportedly........" have been raised previously and surely don't need to be relitigated?] (]) 22:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
There would be multiple issues with your proposed rewrite, so I would advise against it. Just ''some'' of the problems are the obvious peacock terms, the dearth of sources complying with ] - or any sources at all (obituaries and hagiographies aren't reliable). You are correct in that the lead has been more or less unchanged for years, but that is after months of debate and discussion among many editors before reaching consensus. Considering that, I'd imagine that attempts to substantially rewrite this article would be no less controversial than Shach himself. I'd advise reading https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch as well as the part of the manual explaining what the 'lead' is supposed to be.] (]) 15:09, 15 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
:He either met them or he did not. (At present, the article does not actually state whom he met in yeshiva, you having previously removed it...). The ''Yated'' is currently referenced only once? I do not understand how this article "grossly exaggerates his notability". While your ghit chart proves beyond all doubt that M Schneerson was the greatest and most famous rabbi that ever lived, we rely on RS which in fact state Shach was one of, if not the most, influential rabbi in Israel, where he boasted a following far greater than Schneerson. ] (]) 23:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
Who he met or not probably doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, nor does any of this have to do with any other rabbis. What matters is that this article present as neutral and balanced an overview as possible. In it's present form, this article does that without grossly exaggerating Shach's real-world notability.] (]) 23:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
*Please indicate the "obvious peacock terms." | |||
:What description of Shach would "grossly exaggerate" his notability? ] (]) 21:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
*Please indicate which text needs citation. | |||
:I will add that you actually contradict yourself. Above you state "the article on Wiipedia for Shach actually grossly exaggerates his notability" while your previous post says "What matters is that this article present as neutral and balanced an overview as possible. In it's present form, this article does that." I will also counter that you are the one who brought up other rabbis in relation to Shach. Please try presenting a consistent argument here otherwise we end up going round in circles. ] (]) 21:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
*Please provide wikilink which disqualifies citing obituaries. | |||
:And while you insist on removing uncontentious material about his early years and significant information relating to the personalities who influenced him claiming it is , I would beg to disagree. There is no solid reason grounded in the guidelines which preclude us from mentioning his mentors. ] (]) 21:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
*Please provide wikilink which states that previous debate and discussions among editors precludes any further editing. | |||
*Considering ] states: "The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic. It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies," please indicate why you feel the current lead, which only mentions his role as dean and founder of two political parties, sufficiently covers all aspects of Shach's notability. | |||
** ] (]) 21:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
==Predecessors== | |||
*** After the years of constant warring on this page, a version emerged that was the result of consensus. Please ] stop the war and refrain from wholesale deletions and rewrites without real consensus. If you insist on making substantial changes, may I suggest doing one at a time ''after'' discussing with other editors first please. ] (]) 22:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
The text states: "The Shach family had been merchants for generations". says "His father, Rav Ezriel, was a scion of a long chain of rabbis and rabbinical judges." ...? ] (]) 13:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
No one wants to discuss? ] (]) | |||
You, ] , seem intent on forcing your poorly and largely ] revision of a highly controversial page. Discussion should take place and consensus be achieved before revising pages with long histories of debate and final consensus. I might also add that your stealth edits deleting well-sourced information about Shach and his many wars against other rabbis and groups won't make you look particularly honest either. Almost all of Shach's ] during his lifetime and beyond was due to his relentless attacks on other Jewish groups and sects. Your attempt to sanitize his history and make him sound like some type of piously inclined Santa Claus is unlikely to succeed - the historical record is simply too great. Instead of faking an attempt at ''discussion'' - why not read my and ]'s comments above and refrain from starting a needless ]? I'd also recommend familiarizing yourself with the page history and discussions over the years, so that you don't simply waste time rehashing old arguments. ] (]) 03:21, 22 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
:"I might also add that your stealth edits deleting well-sourced information about Shach and his many wars against other rabbis and groups won't make you look particularly honest either." Please provide evidence. ] (]) 23:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
== W1: "Following the controversy"? == | |||
<blockquote>"In 1988, Shach accused Adin Steinsaltz of heresy and was later chief among a group of rabbis banning his works. Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, however, '''approved''' of the Steinsaltz talmud '''following the controversy'''."</blockquote> | |||
{{user|Winchester2313}}, please explain how you that RMF "approved of the Steinsaltz talmud following the controversy." As far as I am aware, RMF issued an endorsement for the original Hebrew version, the controversy began after the death of RMF when the English version appeared. ] (]) 00:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
== W2: Holocoasut == | |||
{{user|Winchester2313}}, why did you , giving preference to the original: | |||
<blockquote>Shach taught that events like ] occurred because the ] accumulated, and they needed to be punished in order to rectify them. He said that, "God kept count of each and every sin, in a running count over hundreds of years, until the count amounted to six million Jews, and that is how the Holocaust occurred. So must a Jew believe, and if a Jew does not completely believe this, he is a ], and if we do not accept this as a punishment, then it is as if we don't believe in The Holy One, Blessed be He..."<ref>Yated Neeman 29/12/90. ''Mussar Iru'ay HaTekufah'' (מוסר אירועי התקופה)(2011) - pg. 36 - http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=52045&st=&pgnum=35</ref></blockquote> | |||
instead of my expanded version with superior citations: | |||
<blockquote>Shach taught that ] was a divine punishment for the ] and for their abandoning of religious observance for the ].<!--and Zionism--><ref name="Mintz1998">{{cite book|author=Jerome Mintz|title=Hasidic People|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uEP5KNUAFh0C&pg=PA377|date=August 19, 1998|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-04109-7|page=377|chapter=Notes to Page 48-52|quote=Schach has maintained that the Holocaust was the result of God's anger toward the Jews for their failure to abide by the mitzvot and their falling under the spell of Zionism and the enlightenment.}}</ref> He said "The Holy One Blessed Be He kept score for hundreds of years until it added up to six million Jews." This caused outrage in the secular Israeli media and a robust response from the ].<ref name="Millerpg392">{{cite book|author=Chaim Miller|title=Turning Judaism Outward: A Biography of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson the Seventh Lubavitcher Rebbe|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z8MNBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA392|year=2014|publisher=Kol Menachem|isbn=978-1-934152-36-2|page=392|quote=In December 1990, the Israeli media was outraged after Rabbi Shach had declared the Holocaust as "definitely a punishment. The Holy One Blessed Be He kept score for hundreds of years until it added up to six million Jews." Convinced that G-d has enacted retribution on sinful Jews for violating the Sabbath and eating pork...}}</ref><ref>Yated Neeman 29/12/90. ''Mussar Iru'ay HaTekufah'' ( (2011). pg. 36</ref> In his defence, Haredi MKs said his comments had been misconstrued and were not meant to justify Nazi atrocities.<ref name="Ayalon1993">{{cite book|author=Ami Ayalon|title=Middle East Contemporary Survey, Volume Xv: 1991|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mSTWx1bg7r4C&pg=PA467|date=December 30, 1993|publisher=The Moshe Dayan Center|isbn=978-0-8133-1869-1|page=467|quote=One such instance, early in the year, was when 93-year-old Rabbi Eliezer Schach, spiritual leader of Israel's ultra-Orthodox “haredi” community, declared that the Holocaust had occurred only because Jews had failed to adhere to the commandments of the Torah, and predicted that if Israel's Jews, under their secular leadership, were to persist in ignoring the dictates of the Bible, a further holocaust was likely to befall them. This statement, <!-- interpreted as a violent condemnation of Zionism, --> aroused an uproar of protest among the secular community. Labor MK Shevah Weiss, a Holocaust survivor, accused Schach of suggesting that Hitler and his Nazi followers, who had so brutally slaughtered the Jewish people, had acted as emissaries of the Almighty. During the bitter parliamentary debate which ensued, Haredi MKs defended the rabbi's statement by claiming that by virtue of its ignorance, the secular community had incorrectly interpreted their leader's statement, which had only sought to explain that Judaism provides both reward and punishment. Was it even conceivable, asked Rabbi Schach's defenders, that, having lost his own family in the Holocaust, he would justify the Nazis' deeds?}}</ref> Wishing to prevent deviation from the established order of prayers, he opposed the composition of new prayers to commemorate the victims of the Holocaust.<ref name="Mendels2007">{{cite book|author=Arye Edrei|editor=Doron Mendels|title=On Memory: An Interdisciplinary Approach|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zBE_q09a5mgC&pg=PA51|year=2007|publisher=Peter Lang|isbn=978-3-03911-064-3|page=51|chapter=Holocaust Memorial|quote=Rabbi Shach also gave explicit expression to this view in strongly opposing the recitation of elegies for the Holocaust on the ninth of Av: "This constitutes a breaking of boundaries and provides a precedent for those who wish to restructure and reform to utilize for justifying further reforms.}}</ref> Shach believed that the secularism of Israel society could cause another Holocaust<ref name="Landau1993pg143">{{cite book|author=David Landau|title=Piety and Power: The World of Jewish Fundamentalism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=65zXAAAAMAAJ|year=1993|publisher=Secker & Warburg|isbn=978-0-436-24156-7|page=143|quote=It was in this context that Rabbi Shach fired off one of his controversial broadsides in December 1990: "Another Holocaust could befall us tomorrow," he warned, because of the secularism of Israel society. "Remember what an old Jew is telling you. God is patient. But he keeps a tally. And one day his patience runs out, as it ran out then, when six million died."}}</ref> and he once said that if the Education Ministry were to be placed in the hands of ] MK ], it would result in "over a million Israeli children being forced into apostasy, and that would be worse than what had happened to Jewish children during the Holocaust."<ref name="Richler1994">{{cite book|author=Mordecai Richler|title=This Year in Jerusalem|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IY-gAAAAMAAJ|year=1994|publisher=Chatto & Windus|isbn=978-0-7011-6272-6|page=73|quote=Ms. Aloni's assumption of that portfolio, said Rabbi Schach, would result in over a million Israeli children being forced into apostasy, and that was worse than what had happened to Jewish children during the Holocaust.}}</ref></blockquote> | |||
...? ] (]) 00:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
==Refs== | ==Refs== | ||
{{reflist}} |
Latest revision as of 03:50, 4 November 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elazar Shach article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yeshiva University - unexplained deletion?
Winchester2313 (talk · contribs) presumably accuses me of an "unexplained deletion", yet the diffs reveal that he himself removed the expanded text on Yeshiva University. The original text had:
Joseph B. Soloveitchik
In a lengthy attack on Joseph B. Soloveitchik (d. 1993) of Yeshiva University, Shach accused him of writing "things that are forbidden to hear", as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy".
The Modern Orthodox and Yeshiva University
Shach wrote that Yeshiva University (YU) type institutions are an entirely negative phenomenon posing a threat to the very endurance of authentic Judaism. Shach said that these modern conceptions were "an absolute disaster, causing the destruction of our Holy Torah. Even the so-called 'Touro College' in the USA is a terrible disaster, a ' churban ha-das ' (destruction of the Jewish religion)..." Shach further writes that the success of those people who were able to achieve greatness in Torah despite their involvement in secular studies are "ma'aseh satan" (the work of the satanic forces), for the existence of such role models will entice others to follow suit, only to be doomed.
My amended version merged these two paragraphs under a section titled "Modern Orthodoxy" as follows:
Shach wrote that Modern Orthodox Yeshiva University type institutions were a threat to authentic Judaism. Shach called them "an absolute disaster, causing the destruction of our Holy Torah. Even the so-called 'Touro College' in the USA is a terrible disaster, a ' churban ha-das ' (destruction of the Jewish religion)..." He felt that the success of people who achieved greatness in Torah despite involvement in secular studies was the work of the "satanic forces." Shach accused Joseph B. Soloveitchik of Yeshiva University of writing "things that are forbidden to hear", as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy".
On 6 September 2021, Winchester2313 removed the Yeshiva University text himself adding in its place:
In a lengthy attack on Joseph B. Soloveitchik (d. 1993) of Yeshiva University, Shach accused him of writing "things that are forbidden to hear", as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy".
only to re-add the missing YU text soon after claiming it was an "unexplained deletion", when in fact he removed it himself under the guise of "restoring longstanding and properly sourced version". (NB. here "properly sourced" = WP:PRIMARY) What is Winchester2313 playing at? Chesdovi (talk) 23:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- I simply restored the longstanding text by copying the earlier (pre-revisionist) version. Shach's WP:NOTABILITY was largely on account of his frequent infamous attacks on other leading rabbis and groups, as evidenced by the majority of his mentions in sources meeting WP:RS. Winchester2313 (talk) 04:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- You also simply removed it without releasing what you had removed, something you seem very prone to and I view as a form of VANDALISM. But never mind.... Now, please provide WP:RS for your claim that Shach's notability stems from his attacks. Notwithstanding, we do not list them here like this in such an unseemly fashion. Chesdovi (talk) 15:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Lead - Preparation area
Elazar Menachem Man Shach (Hebrew: אלעזר מנחם מן שך) (January 1, 1899 – November 2, 2001) was a leading Israeli rabbi of the non-Hasidic Lithuanian stream of Haredi Judaism who served as Rosh yeshiva of Ponevezh Yeshiva in Bnei Brak.
Born in Lithuania, he escaped the impending Holocaust after immigrating to Mandate Palestine where he continued his teaching career. In 1954 he took up position as one of three co-deans of the prestigious Ponevezh Yeshiva, along with rabbis Shmuel Rozovsky and Dovid Povarsky. Recognised for his Torah scholarship, he authored Avi Ezri, a comprehensive four-volume work on Maimonides' Mishneh Torah and eventually became a spiritual mentor to hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Jews.
Considered one of Israel's most influential rabbis and the undisputed leader of Lithuanian Jews in Israel from the mid-1970s until his death he co-headed the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah, was chairman of Chinuch Atzmai and was patron to hundreds of institutions and organisations around the world, including many yeshivas he established for Sephardim. Seen as the successor of the Chazon Ish, he was held in high esteem among large portions of the non-Hasidic Ashkenazi community over whom he was able to dominate and impose his will, an attribute lacking in today's divided and factional rabbinic leadership.
His uncompromising stance and strong conservative opinions often led to controversy, prompting opponents to label him a "Jewish Khomeini". He was at forefront of a bitter struggle against Chabad messianism and often railed against the secularism of Israeli society. In favour of giving up land for peace, he was seen as a political dove and fiercely opposed the establishment of Jewish settlements in the West Bank.
Although ideologically opposed to Zionism, he was instrumental in founding two Israeli political parties (Shas in 1984 representing Sepharadim, and Degel Hatorah in 1988 representing Lithuanian Ashkenazim) which won disproportionate state funds for yeshivas and other orthodox institutions. In 1990, he emerged as a political kingmaker when he prevented religious parties joining a left-wing government on the grounds that Labour was "anti-Jewish".
Comments
This proposed rewrite does nothing to improve on the existing version - on the contrary, it actually replaces key contextual information and details from high quality sources with an overly lengthy and poorly sourced ramble by one editor. There is no reason to replace the existing, longstanding consensus version with this proposed sanitized version which runs afoul of WP:BALANCED, WP:NPOV, WP:RS and WP:NOT. Winchester2313 (talk) 04:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Please explain why it "runs afoul of WP:BALANCED, WP:NPOV, WP:RS and WP:NOT." Don't just keep plastering these WP:GULDILINES every time. You are not grappling with the issues at hand. You write here that the current LEAD contains "high quality sources." It contains one: 'Haaretz' daily newspaper, Shachar Ilan, November 2, 2001. Your comments here are nonsensical. You are wasting my time. Chesdovi (talk) 15:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
It seems quite clear that a certain editor is actually an activist committed to forcing their revisions onto this page with a view to creating a distorted narrative about it's highly controversial subject, rather than actually achieving WP:CONSENSUS. This is obviously disruptive editing and does not improve the page in any way.
The lead as well as the page in general is actually WP:BALANCED in it's present (and longstanding form), as opposed to the proposed 'sanitized' version. If Chesdovi insists on turning this page into a battleground, it's clear that an ANI will have to be the next stop, and I feel that perhaps a page block would be the appropriate remedy. Winchester2313 (talk) 06:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- It is impossible to reach "consensus" when you refuse to be specific about what precisely is unbalanced, distorted and disruptive. I totally reject your accusations. 1. The article in its current form is not balanced. 2. that the page has been longstanding in its current form is simply not an argument. 3. what is being "distorted" and how? 4. describing the subject as "highly controversial" as a reason for stifling further editing is really not helpful. 6. That my additions with numerous sourced citations is described by you as "not improving the page in any way" is just disgusting. Chesdovi (talk) 11:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
A simple look at the google search results or even google news results will show that the article on Wiipedia for Shach actually grossly exaggerates his notability. Compare the following well known Orthodox Jewish 20th century rabbis: Adin Steinsaltz - google results = 244,000 Moshe Feinstein - google results = 330,000 Menachem Schneerson google results = 336,000 Ovadia Yosef google results = 219,000 Jonathan Sacks google results = 121,000 Elazar Shach google results = 39,000
A look at the pitiful google news results for Elazar Shach make this even clearer with 189 results compared to 2360 for Moshe Feinstein, 5620 for Ovadia Yosef or 7180 for Menachem Schneerson. It is patently absurd for this article to be aggressively stuffed with references to every person he supposedly met while in one yeshiva or another. This reeks of a very transparent attempt to artificially exaggerate his notability by supposed association with more notable figures. The article as it reads now needs trimming, not more stuffing. Also, the issues with citing from the Yated and their writers moonlighting at similarly transparent partisan publications where we're treated to stories about the wunderkind who "reportedly........" have been raised previously and surely don't need to be relitigated?Londoner77 (talk) 22:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- He either met them or he did not. (At present, the article does not actually state whom he met in yeshiva, you having previously removed it...). The Yated is currently referenced only once? I do not understand how this article "grossly exaggerates his notability". While your ghit chart proves beyond all doubt that M Schneerson was the greatest and most famous rabbi that ever lived, we rely on RS which in fact state Shach was one of, if not the most, influential rabbi in Israel, where he boasted a following far greater than Schneerson. Chesdovi (talk) 23:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Who he met or not probably doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, nor does any of this have to do with any other rabbis. What matters is that this article present as neutral and balanced an overview as possible. In it's present form, this article does that without grossly exaggerating Shach's real-world notability.Londoner77 (talk) 23:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- What description of Shach would "grossly exaggerate" his notability? Chesdovi (talk) 21:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- I will add that you actually contradict yourself. Above you state "the article on Wiipedia for Shach actually grossly exaggerates his notability" while your previous post says "What matters is that this article present as neutral and balanced an overview as possible. In it's present form, this article does that." I will also counter that you are the one who brought up other rabbis in relation to Shach. Please try presenting a consistent argument here otherwise we end up going round in circles. Chesdovi (talk) 21:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- And while you insist on removing uncontentious material about his early years and significant information relating to the personalities who influenced him claiming it is "non-notable", I would beg to disagree. There is no solid reason grounded in the guidelines which preclude us from mentioning his mentors. Chesdovi (talk) 21:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Predecessors
The text states: "The Shach family had been merchants for generations". This book says "His father, Rav Ezriel, was a scion of a long chain of rabbis and rabbinical judges." ...? Chesdovi (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Refs
- ^ Jeremy Sharon. (January 26, 2021). Skunk spray, burning bins highlight gov't impotence to haredi resistance, Jerusalem Post.
- (March 25, 2009). Rabbi Avraham Ravitz: Israeli politician, The Times.
- Leon Mock. The Concept of "Ruach Ra'ah" in Contemporary Rabbinic Responsa (1945–2000): Possible Relations between Knowledge of the Physical World and Traditional Knowledge in Rabbinic Judaism, De Gruyter, 2021. pg. 246.
- Shlomo Lorincz. In Their Shadow: The Chazon Ish, the Brisker Rav, Rav Shach, pg. 282. Feldheim Publishers, 2008.
- Shahar Ilan. Rabbi Schach, a Man of Wars and Battles, Haaretz. Nov. 4, 2001
- Tuvia Friling. A Jewish Kapo in Auschwitz: History, Memory, and the Politics of Survival, Brandeis University Press, 2014. pg. 255. "This Rabbi Soloveitchik was also a great admirer of Rabbi Elazar Menachem Shach, the Hazon Ish's successor as the acknowledged leader of a large part of the Israeli Haredi community...".
- ^ Lawrence Joffe. (November 06, 2001). Obituary: Rabbi Eliezer Schach, The Guardian
- Anshel Pfeffer. (Feb. 5, 2021). Opinion | How the Haredi Street Turned Racist and Ultra-nationalist, Haaretz.
- Ariel Handel, Marco Allegra, Erez Maggor. Normalizing Occupation: The Politics of Everyday Life in the West Bank Settlements, pg. 117. Indiana University Press. (2017)
- B-Class Lithuania articles
- Low-importance Lithuania articles
- B-Class Judaism articles
- Mid-importance Judaism articles
- B-Class Israel-related articles
- Mid-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Mid-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of politicians and government-people
- B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of scientists and academics
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles