Revision as of 19:12, 25 April 2015 editDebresser (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors110,467 edits →Ideologue and Zealot: Agree + move.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:50, 4 November 2024 edit undoMonkbot (talk | contribs)Bots3,695,952 editsm Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);Tag: AWB | ||
(124 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header|search=yes}} | {{Talk header|search=yes}} | ||
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=a-i}} | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|living=no|listas=Shach, Elazar|1= | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Lithuania|importance=low}} | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Judaism|importance=Mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Israel|importance=mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Biography|needs-photo=y|s&a-work-group = y|s&a-priority = Low|politician-work-group = y|politician-priority =Mid}} | |||
|living=no | |||
|class= B | |||
|needs-photo=y | |||
|listas=Shach, Elazar | |||
|s&a-work-group = y | |||
|s&a-priority = Low | |||
|politician-work-group = y | |||
|politician-priority =Mid | |||
}} | }} | ||
}} | |||
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I|age=30|dounreplied=yes}} | |||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | ||
|target=Talk:Elazar Shach/Archive index | |target=Talk:Elazar Shach/Archive index | ||
Line 24: | Line 15: | ||
|archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | |archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 140K | |maxarchivesize = 140K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 3 | ||
|minthreadtoarchive = 1 | |minthreadtoarchive = 1 | ||
|minthreadsleft = 4 | |minthreadsleft = 4 | ||
Line 31: | Line 22: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Quote from book "Raising Roses Among the Thorns" == | |||
Please see Fladrif's comments here: | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_146#Quote_from_book_.22Raising_Roses_Among_the_Thorns.22_regarding_Rabbi_Elazar_Shach | |||
Assuming no valid objections are raised, I will be restoring the information shortly. Thanks | |||
] (]) 02:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
: No problem here. An interesting quote. Although not sure how important. ] (]) 07:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
In agreement with Yonoson, and it is very important particularly since the question of drafting Haredi yeshiva students is now even more a key topic of public discussion in Israel, after the latest Israeli elections with the Haredi leaders now in opposition it has become one of the biggest and most divisive hot potatoe political and religious issues in Israel. ] (]) 10:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Agree. If that what it is about, then that is important and actual. ] (]) 13:51, 19 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
'''NOTE''': Per ]: "Resolved: Clearly a reliable source. Underlying disputes should be raised at another DR board. Fladrif (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC) " Thank you, ] (]) 21:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
==Yeshiva University - unexplained deletion?== | |||
: Hi IZAK, thanks for the input. | |||
{{user|Winchester2313}} presumably accuses ''me'' of an , yet the diffs reveal that he himself removed the expanded text on Yeshiva University. The original text had: | |||
: Just want to clarify something, though. The quote from the book "Raising Roses Among the Thorns" () is not about the Haredi draft. That is from a different book, "Israel and the Politics of Jewish Identity: The Secular-Religious Impasse" (). | |||
: But either way, Fladrif agreed that the quotes from both books are reliable. ] (]) 22:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>'''Joseph B. Soloveitchik''' | |||
== Quote from book "Israel and the Politics of Jewish Identity: The Secular-Religious Impasse" == | |||
In a lengthy attack on Joseph B. Soloveitchik (d. 1993) of Yeshiva University, Shach accused him of writing "things that are forbidden to hear", as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy". | |||
This was discussed at length . Fladriff's conclusion: "Resolved: Clearly a reliable source. Underlying disputes should be raised at another DR board." | |||
'''The Modern Orthodox and Yeshiva University ''' | |||
Assuming no valid objections are raised, I will be restoring the quote shortly. Thanks. ] (]) 01:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Shach wrote that Yeshiva University (YU) type institutions are an entirely negative phenomenon posing a threat to the very endurance of authentic Judaism. Shach said that these modern conceptions were "an absolute disaster, causing the destruction of our Holy Torah. Even the so-called 'Touro College' in the USA is a terrible disaster, a ' churban ha-das ' (destruction of the Jewish religion)..."<sup></sup> Shach further writes that the success of those people who were able to achieve greatness in Torah despite their involvement in secular studies are "ma'aseh satan" (the work of the satanic forces), for the existence of such role models will entice others to follow suit, only to be doomed.<sup></sup></blockquote> | |||
== Edits and restoring previous version. == | |||
My amended version merged these two paragraphs under a section titled "Modern Orthodoxy" as follows: | |||
<blockquote>Shach wrote that Modern Orthodox Yeshiva University type institutions were a threat to authentic Judaism. Shach called them "an absolute disaster, causing the destruction of our Holy Torah. Even the so-called 'Touro College' in the USA is a terrible disaster, a ' churban ha-das ' (destruction of the Jewish religion)..."<sup></sup> He felt that the success of people who achieved greatness in Torah despite involvement in secular studies was the work of the "satanic forces."<sup></sup> Shach accused Joseph B. Soloveitchik of Yeshiva University of writing "things that are forbidden to hear",<sup></sup> as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy".<sup></sup></blockquote> | |||
On 6 September 2021, ] adding in its place:<blockquote>In a lengthy attack on Joseph B. Soloveitchik (d. 1993) of Yeshiva University, Shach accused him of writing "things that are forbidden to hear",<sup></sup> as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy".<sup></sup></blockquote> | |||
only to re-add the missing YU text soon after claiming it was an , when in fact he removed it himself under the guise of ''"restoring longstanding and properly sourced version"''. (NB. here "properly sourced" = ]) What is ] playing at? ] (]) 23:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
:I simply restored the longstanding text by copying the earlier (pre-revisionist) version. Shach's ] was largely on account of his frequent infamous attacks on other leading rabbis and groups, as evidenced by the majority of his mentions in sources meeting ]. ] (]) 04:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
I've restored some information and undone a few of IZAK's edits of March 2013 which make no sense and had no consensus. If anybody wants to make major changes to the structure of a controversial article they should seek consensus first and that way we can avoid a lot of the wars that went on here in the past.--C Steffen 21:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::You also simply removed it without releasing what you had removed, something you seem very prone to and I view as a form of ]. But never mind.... Now, please provide ] for your claim that Shach's notability stems from his attacks. Notwithstanding, we do not list them here like this in such an unseemly fashion. ] (]) 15:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
==Lead - Preparation area== | |||
== Position on territorial compromise == | |||
'''Elazar Menachem Man Shach''' ({{langx|he|אלעזר מנחם מן שך}}) (January 1, 1899 – November 2, 2001) was a leading ] ] of the non-Hasidic ] of ] who served as ] of ] in ]. | |||
Born in ], he escaped the impending ] after immigrating to ] where he continued his teaching career. In 1954 he took up position as one of three ] of the prestigious Ponevezh Yeshiva, along with rabbis ] and ]. Recognised for his Torah scholarship, he authored ''Avi Ezri'', a comprehensive four-volume work on ]' '']'' and eventually became a spiritual mentor to hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Jews.<ref name=SharonJ>Jeremy Sharon. (January 26, 2021). , ''Jerusalem Post''.</ref> | |||
I've removed the statement added by ] claiming that ] 'concurred with Shach's opinion' on this issue since the sources provided don't even mention Shach so its pure ]. Please don't put back any info that isn't properly sourced and really, PLEASE don't fabricate sources!--C Steffen 02:38, 13 August 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Considered one of Israel's most influential rabbis<ref>(March 25, 2009). , ''The Times''.</ref> and the undisputed leader of Lithuanian Jews in Israel from the mid-1970s until his death<ref> | |||
== Ideologue and Zealot == | |||
Leon Mock. '''', ], 2021. pg. 246.</ref> he co-headed the ], was chairman of ] and was patron to hundreds of institutions and organisations around the world,<ref>Shlomo Lorincz. , pg. 282. Feldheim Publishers, 2008.</ref> including many yeshivas he established for Sephardim.<ref>Shahar Ilan. , ''Haaretz''. Nov. 4, 2001</ref> Seen as the successor of the ],<ref>Tuvia Friling. , Brandeis University Press, 2014. pg. 255. "This Rabbi Soloveitchik was also a great admirer of Rabbi Elazar Menachem Shach, the Hazon Ish's successor as the acknowledged leader of a large part of the Israeli Haredi community...".</ref> he was held in high esteem among large portions of the non-Hasidic Ashkenazi community over whom he was able to dominate and impose his will, an attribute lacking in today's divided and factional rabbinic leadership.<ref name=SharonJ/> | |||
His uncompromising stance and strong conservative opinions often led to controversy, prompting opponents to label him a "Jewish ]".<ref name=Guardian061101>Lawrence Joffe. (November 06, 2001). , ''The Guardian''</ref> He was at forefront of a bitter struggle against ] and often railed against the secularism of Israeli society.<ref name=AP050221>Anshel Pfeffer. (Feb. 5, 2021). , ''Haaretz''.</ref> In favour of giving up ], he was seen as a political dove and fiercely opposed the establishment of Jewish settlements in the West Bank.<ref>Ariel Handel, Marco Allegra, Erez Maggor. , pg. 117. Indiana University Press. (2017)</reF> | |||
These people are NOT described in their Misplaced Pages summaries as ideologues and zealots: | |||
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, | |||
Hassan Nasrallah, | |||
Osama Bin Laden, | |||
Louis Farrakhan. | |||
Although ideologically opposed to Zionism, he was instrumental in founding two Israeli political parties (] in 1984 representing ], and ] in 1988 representing ] ]) which won disproportionate state funds for ] and other orthodox institutions.<ref name=Guardian061101/> In 1990, he emerged as a political kingmaker when he prevented religious parties joining a left-wing government on the grounds that ] was "]".<ref name=Guardian061101/> | |||
Apparently, these biased, hateful words are reserved by Jewish Misplaced Pages editors to use against learned rabbis only. I removed them and they were replaced. I removed them again. This is ''not'' the encyclopedia style that is supposed to be maintained here! ] (]) 00:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
===Comments=== | |||
Additionally, the editor who replaced those words claimed that they were "sourced" (from a Haaretz article, which is a newspaper generally unsympathetic to Haredim). I can't find the original online but I reworded it to sound more neutral and kept the source reference. I see no problem with that. ] (]) 00:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
This proposed rewrite does nothing to improve on the existing version - on the contrary, it actually replaces key contextual information and details from high quality sources with an overly lengthy and poorly sourced ramble by one editor. There is no reason to replace the existing, longstanding ''consensus'' version with this proposed sanitized version which runs afoul of ], ], ] and ]. ] (]) 04:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
:Please explain why it "runs afoul of ], ], ] and ]." Don't just keep plastering these WP:GULDILINES every time. You are not grappling with the issues at hand. You write here that the current LEAD contains "high quality sources." It contains one: '''Haaretz' daily newspaper, Shachar Ilan, November 2, 2001''. Your comments here are nonsensical. You are wasting my time. ] (]) 15:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
It seems quite clear that a certain editor is actually an activist committed to forcing their revisions onto this page with a view to creating a distorted narrative about it's highly controversial subject, rather than actually achieving ]. This is obviously disruptive editing and does not improve the page in any way. | |||
:I think you're right, ]. ], part of the Manual of Style, says that "Value-laden labels ... may express contentious opinion and are best avoided unless widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject. In some cases, in-text attribution might be a better option." If it is necessary to use the words "ideologue" and "zealot"—and I don't believe it is—we should say something like "''Haaretz'' described Shach as an ideologue and zealot". — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 03:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
The lead as well as the page in general is actually ] in it's present (and longstanding form), as opposed to the proposed 'sanitized' version. If ] insists on turning this page into a battleground, it's clear that an ANI will have to be the next stop, and I feel that perhaps a page block would be the appropriate remedy. ] (]) 06:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: I strongly disagree. I think this is another case of censoring Misplaced Pages (the first being when ] was not called "controversial", despite multiple reliable sources saying precisely that). The strange thing is that some editors prefer removing factually correct, neutrally worded, relevant and reliably sourced information from articles, and there is no outcry. Well, at least I want to register my strong disagreement with this approach. I think the words "zealot" and "ideologue" must stay. ] (]) 05:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
:It is impossible to reach "consensus" when you refuse to be specific about what precisely is unbalanced, distorted and disruptive. I totally reject your accusations. 1. The article in its current form is not balanced. 2. that the page has been longstanding in its current form is simply not an argument. 3. what is being "distorted" and how? 4. describing the subject as "highly controversial" as a reason for stifling further editing is really not helpful. 6. That my additions with numerous sourced citations is described by you as "not improving the page in any way" is just disgusting. ] (]) 11:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
A simple look at the google search results or even google news results will show that the article on Wiipedia for Shach actually grossly exaggerates his notability. Compare the following well known Orthodox Jewish 20th century rabbis: | |||
:: To counter the argument as though the text should use a qualifier like "has been described as". First of all, I can live with that, by way of compromise. But actually, this is not necessary, according to Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. If the source is reliable, then on Misplaced Pages we do not have to use such qualifiers. The opposite would lead to ridiculous situations, where every statement would need to be qualified in such a way. ] (]) 05:14, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
] - google results = 244,000 | |||
] - google results = 330,000 | |||
] google results = 336,000 | |||
] google results = 219,000 | |||
] google results = 121,000 | |||
] google results = 39,000 | |||
A look at the pitiful google news results for Elazar Shach make this even clearer with 189 results compared to 2360 for Moshe Feinstein, 5620 for Ovadia Yosef or 7180 for Menachem Schneerson. It is patently absurd for this article to be aggressively stuffed with references to every person he supposedly met while in one yeshiva or another. This reeks of a very transparent attempt to artificially exaggerate his notability by supposed association with more notable figures. The article as it reads now needs trimming, not more stuffing. Also, the issues with citing from the Yated and their writers moonlighting at similarly transparent partisan publications where we're treated to stories about the wunderkind who "reportedly........" have been raised previously and surely don't need to be relitigated?] (]) 22:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: I'd also ask MosheEmes to not compare the rabbi to terrorists, as that makes the argument emotional instead of rationale. | |||
:He either met them or he did not. (At present, the article does not actually state whom he met in yeshiva, you having previously removed it...). The ''Yated'' is currently referenced only once? I do not understand how this article "grossly exaggerates his notability". While your ghit chart proves beyond all doubt that M Schneerson was the greatest and most famous rabbi that ever lived, we rely on RS which in fact state Shach was one of, if not the most, influential rabbi in Israel, where he boasted a following far greater than Schneerson. ] (]) 23:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: Another form of compromise I could live with is have a more moderate sentence in the lead, and move the present sentence to the Political life section. ] (]) 21:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Who he met or not probably doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, nor does any of this have to do with any other rabbis. What matters is that this article present as neutral and balanced an overview as possible. In it's present form, this article does that without grossly exaggerating Shach's real-world notability.] (]) 23:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
:::Debresser, the sentence in question was lifted word-for-word from the ''Haaretz'' article. As I see it, we have three choices: (a) set it off in quotation marks and attribute it, (b) remove it as a ], or (c) paraphrase it. Until we decide, I've ] and taken course (a). — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 21:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
:What description of Shach would "grossly exaggerate" his notability? ] (]) 21:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
:I will add that you actually contradict yourself. Above you state "the article on Wiipedia for Shach actually grossly exaggerates his notability" while your previous post says "What matters is that this article present as neutral and balanced an overview as possible. In it's present form, this article does that." I will also counter that you are the one who brought up other rabbis in relation to Shach. Please try presenting a consistent argument here otherwise we end up going round in circles. ] (]) 21:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
:And while you insist on removing uncontentious material about his early years and significant information relating to the personalities who influenced him claiming it is , I would beg to disagree. There is no solid reason grounded in the guidelines which preclude us from mentioning his mentors. ] (]) 21:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
==Predecessors== | |||
Thank you. I like Malik's solution. I also think it's an exaggeration to compare this to the Sand case. I would not have made a fuss if the intro simply said Rabbi Shach was controversial. He was. "Ideologue" may be accurate but it has a negative connotation and the same could be said about secular leaders like Golda Meir. Just it won't be said because more people like her. So she's described positively as "strong-willed and straight-talking". "Zealot" is even worse, as if he's going around fomenting revolution or something. ] (]) 10:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
The text states: "The Shach family had been merchants for generations". says "His father, Rav Ezriel, was a scion of a long chain of rabbis and rabbinical judges." ...? ] (]) 13:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
==Refs== | |||
: Yes, I agree that since it is a direct quotation, it must be ascribed to its source, per ]. I repeat my proposal to move this sentence to the Political life section, especially since it is too specific now for the lead. ] (]) 19:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
{{reflist}} |
Latest revision as of 03:50, 4 November 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elazar Shach article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yeshiva University - unexplained deletion?
Winchester2313 (talk · contribs) presumably accuses me of an "unexplained deletion", yet the diffs reveal that he himself removed the expanded text on Yeshiva University. The original text had:
Joseph B. Soloveitchik
In a lengthy attack on Joseph B. Soloveitchik (d. 1993) of Yeshiva University, Shach accused him of writing "things that are forbidden to hear", as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy".
The Modern Orthodox and Yeshiva University
Shach wrote that Yeshiva University (YU) type institutions are an entirely negative phenomenon posing a threat to the very endurance of authentic Judaism. Shach said that these modern conceptions were "an absolute disaster, causing the destruction of our Holy Torah. Even the so-called 'Touro College' in the USA is a terrible disaster, a ' churban ha-das ' (destruction of the Jewish religion)..." Shach further writes that the success of those people who were able to achieve greatness in Torah despite their involvement in secular studies are "ma'aseh satan" (the work of the satanic forces), for the existence of such role models will entice others to follow suit, only to be doomed.
My amended version merged these two paragraphs under a section titled "Modern Orthodoxy" as follows:
Shach wrote that Modern Orthodox Yeshiva University type institutions were a threat to authentic Judaism. Shach called them "an absolute disaster, causing the destruction of our Holy Torah. Even the so-called 'Touro College' in the USA is a terrible disaster, a ' churban ha-das ' (destruction of the Jewish religion)..." He felt that the success of people who achieved greatness in Torah despite involvement in secular studies was the work of the "satanic forces." Shach accused Joseph B. Soloveitchik of Yeshiva University of writing "things that are forbidden to hear", as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy".
On 6 September 2021, Winchester2313 removed the Yeshiva University text himself adding in its place:
In a lengthy attack on Joseph B. Soloveitchik (d. 1993) of Yeshiva University, Shach accused him of writing "things that are forbidden to hear", as well as of "...endangering the survival of Torah-true Judaism by indoctrinating the masses with actual words of heresy".
only to re-add the missing YU text soon after claiming it was an "unexplained deletion", when in fact he removed it himself under the guise of "restoring longstanding and properly sourced version". (NB. here "properly sourced" = WP:PRIMARY) What is Winchester2313 playing at? Chesdovi (talk) 23:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- I simply restored the longstanding text by copying the earlier (pre-revisionist) version. Shach's WP:NOTABILITY was largely on account of his frequent infamous attacks on other leading rabbis and groups, as evidenced by the majority of his mentions in sources meeting WP:RS. Winchester2313 (talk) 04:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- You also simply removed it without releasing what you had removed, something you seem very prone to and I view as a form of VANDALISM. But never mind.... Now, please provide WP:RS for your claim that Shach's notability stems from his attacks. Notwithstanding, we do not list them here like this in such an unseemly fashion. Chesdovi (talk) 15:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Lead - Preparation area
Elazar Menachem Man Shach (Hebrew: אלעזר מנחם מן שך) (January 1, 1899 – November 2, 2001) was a leading Israeli rabbi of the non-Hasidic Lithuanian stream of Haredi Judaism who served as Rosh yeshiva of Ponevezh Yeshiva in Bnei Brak.
Born in Lithuania, he escaped the impending Holocaust after immigrating to Mandate Palestine where he continued his teaching career. In 1954 he took up position as one of three co-deans of the prestigious Ponevezh Yeshiva, along with rabbis Shmuel Rozovsky and Dovid Povarsky. Recognised for his Torah scholarship, he authored Avi Ezri, a comprehensive four-volume work on Maimonides' Mishneh Torah and eventually became a spiritual mentor to hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Jews.
Considered one of Israel's most influential rabbis and the undisputed leader of Lithuanian Jews in Israel from the mid-1970s until his death he co-headed the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah, was chairman of Chinuch Atzmai and was patron to hundreds of institutions and organisations around the world, including many yeshivas he established for Sephardim. Seen as the successor of the Chazon Ish, he was held in high esteem among large portions of the non-Hasidic Ashkenazi community over whom he was able to dominate and impose his will, an attribute lacking in today's divided and factional rabbinic leadership.
His uncompromising stance and strong conservative opinions often led to controversy, prompting opponents to label him a "Jewish Khomeini". He was at forefront of a bitter struggle against Chabad messianism and often railed against the secularism of Israeli society. In favour of giving up land for peace, he was seen as a political dove and fiercely opposed the establishment of Jewish settlements in the West Bank.
Although ideologically opposed to Zionism, he was instrumental in founding two Israeli political parties (Shas in 1984 representing Sepharadim, and Degel Hatorah in 1988 representing Lithuanian Ashkenazim) which won disproportionate state funds for yeshivas and other orthodox institutions. In 1990, he emerged as a political kingmaker when he prevented religious parties joining a left-wing government on the grounds that Labour was "anti-Jewish".
Comments
This proposed rewrite does nothing to improve on the existing version - on the contrary, it actually replaces key contextual information and details from high quality sources with an overly lengthy and poorly sourced ramble by one editor. There is no reason to replace the existing, longstanding consensus version with this proposed sanitized version which runs afoul of WP:BALANCED, WP:NPOV, WP:RS and WP:NOT. Winchester2313 (talk) 04:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Please explain why it "runs afoul of WP:BALANCED, WP:NPOV, WP:RS and WP:NOT." Don't just keep plastering these WP:GULDILINES every time. You are not grappling with the issues at hand. You write here that the current LEAD contains "high quality sources." It contains one: 'Haaretz' daily newspaper, Shachar Ilan, November 2, 2001. Your comments here are nonsensical. You are wasting my time. Chesdovi (talk) 15:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
It seems quite clear that a certain editor is actually an activist committed to forcing their revisions onto this page with a view to creating a distorted narrative about it's highly controversial subject, rather than actually achieving WP:CONSENSUS. This is obviously disruptive editing and does not improve the page in any way.
The lead as well as the page in general is actually WP:BALANCED in it's present (and longstanding form), as opposed to the proposed 'sanitized' version. If Chesdovi insists on turning this page into a battleground, it's clear that an ANI will have to be the next stop, and I feel that perhaps a page block would be the appropriate remedy. Winchester2313 (talk) 06:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- It is impossible to reach "consensus" when you refuse to be specific about what precisely is unbalanced, distorted and disruptive. I totally reject your accusations. 1. The article in its current form is not balanced. 2. that the page has been longstanding in its current form is simply not an argument. 3. what is being "distorted" and how? 4. describing the subject as "highly controversial" as a reason for stifling further editing is really not helpful. 6. That my additions with numerous sourced citations is described by you as "not improving the page in any way" is just disgusting. Chesdovi (talk) 11:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
A simple look at the google search results or even google news results will show that the article on Wiipedia for Shach actually grossly exaggerates his notability. Compare the following well known Orthodox Jewish 20th century rabbis: Adin Steinsaltz - google results = 244,000 Moshe Feinstein - google results = 330,000 Menachem Schneerson google results = 336,000 Ovadia Yosef google results = 219,000 Jonathan Sacks google results = 121,000 Elazar Shach google results = 39,000
A look at the pitiful google news results for Elazar Shach make this even clearer with 189 results compared to 2360 for Moshe Feinstein, 5620 for Ovadia Yosef or 7180 for Menachem Schneerson. It is patently absurd for this article to be aggressively stuffed with references to every person he supposedly met while in one yeshiva or another. This reeks of a very transparent attempt to artificially exaggerate his notability by supposed association with more notable figures. The article as it reads now needs trimming, not more stuffing. Also, the issues with citing from the Yated and their writers moonlighting at similarly transparent partisan publications where we're treated to stories about the wunderkind who "reportedly........" have been raised previously and surely don't need to be relitigated?Londoner77 (talk) 22:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- He either met them or he did not. (At present, the article does not actually state whom he met in yeshiva, you having previously removed it...). The Yated is currently referenced only once? I do not understand how this article "grossly exaggerates his notability". While your ghit chart proves beyond all doubt that M Schneerson was the greatest and most famous rabbi that ever lived, we rely on RS which in fact state Shach was one of, if not the most, influential rabbi in Israel, where he boasted a following far greater than Schneerson. Chesdovi (talk) 23:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Who he met or not probably doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, nor does any of this have to do with any other rabbis. What matters is that this article present as neutral and balanced an overview as possible. In it's present form, this article does that without grossly exaggerating Shach's real-world notability.Londoner77 (talk) 23:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- What description of Shach would "grossly exaggerate" his notability? Chesdovi (talk) 21:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- I will add that you actually contradict yourself. Above you state "the article on Wiipedia for Shach actually grossly exaggerates his notability" while your previous post says "What matters is that this article present as neutral and balanced an overview as possible. In it's present form, this article does that." I will also counter that you are the one who brought up other rabbis in relation to Shach. Please try presenting a consistent argument here otherwise we end up going round in circles. Chesdovi (talk) 21:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- And while you insist on removing uncontentious material about his early years and significant information relating to the personalities who influenced him claiming it is "non-notable", I would beg to disagree. There is no solid reason grounded in the guidelines which preclude us from mentioning his mentors. Chesdovi (talk) 21:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Predecessors
The text states: "The Shach family had been merchants for generations". This book says "His father, Rav Ezriel, was a scion of a long chain of rabbis and rabbinical judges." ...? Chesdovi (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Refs
- ^ Jeremy Sharon. (January 26, 2021). Skunk spray, burning bins highlight gov't impotence to haredi resistance, Jerusalem Post.
- (March 25, 2009). Rabbi Avraham Ravitz: Israeli politician, The Times.
- Leon Mock. The Concept of "Ruach Ra'ah" in Contemporary Rabbinic Responsa (1945–2000): Possible Relations between Knowledge of the Physical World and Traditional Knowledge in Rabbinic Judaism, De Gruyter, 2021. pg. 246.
- Shlomo Lorincz. In Their Shadow: The Chazon Ish, the Brisker Rav, Rav Shach, pg. 282. Feldheim Publishers, 2008.
- Shahar Ilan. Rabbi Schach, a Man of Wars and Battles, Haaretz. Nov. 4, 2001
- Tuvia Friling. A Jewish Kapo in Auschwitz: History, Memory, and the Politics of Survival, Brandeis University Press, 2014. pg. 255. "This Rabbi Soloveitchik was also a great admirer of Rabbi Elazar Menachem Shach, the Hazon Ish's successor as the acknowledged leader of a large part of the Israeli Haredi community...".
- ^ Lawrence Joffe. (November 06, 2001). Obituary: Rabbi Eliezer Schach, The Guardian
- Anshel Pfeffer. (Feb. 5, 2021). Opinion | How the Haredi Street Turned Racist and Ultra-nationalist, Haaretz.
- Ariel Handel, Marco Allegra, Erez Maggor. Normalizing Occupation: The Politics of Everyday Life in the West Bank Settlements, pg. 117. Indiana University Press. (2017)
- B-Class Lithuania articles
- Low-importance Lithuania articles
- B-Class Judaism articles
- Mid-importance Judaism articles
- B-Class Israel-related articles
- Mid-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Mid-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of politicians and government-people
- B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of scientists and academics
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles