Talk:Race to the bottom: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 12:40, 13 March 2021 editTgm1024 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users544 edits →This is not an example of "race to the bottom" NOT the definition.: new section← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 15:12, 4 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk \| contribs)Bots1,372,347 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Race to the bottom/Archives/2021. (BOT)
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talk header}}		{{Talk header}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Start\|
	{{WikiProjectBannerShell\|1=
	{{WikiProject Business~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Mid}}		{{WikiProject Business\|importance=Mid}}
	{{WikiProject Economics~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject Economics\|importance=Low}}
	{{WikiProject Globalization~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Mid}}		{{WikiProject Globalization\|importance=Mid}}
	{{WikiProject Philosophy\|ethics=yes~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject Philosophy\|ethics=yes\|importance=Low}}
	{{WikiProject Trade~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Mid}}		{{WikiProject Trade\|importance=Mid}}
	}}		}}
	{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:Race to the bottom/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}		{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:Race to the bottom/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}

	== Bias ==

	This article reads from a very leftist perspective, thanks in large part to relying upon left-wing sources. There are important game theory applications of this term and nowhere does this discuss the "Delaware Effect" (opposite of the "California Effect" which has been called "race to the top" before Obama lifted the term). I imagine one could make a ] argument to have this deleted. <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 19:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

	:Probably from your perspective, the very thing, the concept of a race to the bottom is left biased. Certainly the notion that wages are low is a left perspective, by rightist perspective they can't be too low, the lower the better for "entrepreneurship". Contrary to what you say, the main space text and much of the back matter make clear the opposite is the case (the immediately prior comment is an (accurate if inarticulate) exception). I have corrected this by at least making clear what the metaphor is about. The ubiquity of right wing perspectives, while in rapid decay from the pile up of its effects, allows such obvious glaring mistakes of fact. ] (]) 06:04, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

	::The clarification I've added to the lede was stimulated by the tagging which is justified by the right wing obfuscation of the meaning of the term just referred to. I would remove the tag but the body of the article still so solidly reflects that obfuscation that it is still justified. ] (]) 09:48, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

	== This is not an example of "race to the bottom" NOT the definition. ==


	The entire article is predicated on an article called "racing to the bottom". This is a mistake, because that article may be an example of race to the bottom, but it is not the definition.

	The term "race to the bottom" has always included inter- and intra-company decisions that among many things involve the decisions to lower quality in order to compete in volume. It's actually a fairly economically terrifying dynamic playing out today, and this article is only confusing people.
	] (]) 12:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:12, 4 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Race to the bottom article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Globalization Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Trade Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Categories:

Revision as of 12:40, 13 March 2021 editTgm1024 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users544 edits →This is not an example of "race to the bottom" NOT the definition.: new section← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 15:12, 4 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk \| contribs)Bots1,372,347 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Race to the bottom/Archives/2021. (BOT)
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talk header}}		{{Talk header}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Start\|
	{{WikiProjectBannerShell\|1=
	{{WikiProject Business~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Mid}}		{{WikiProject Business\|importance=Mid}}
	{{WikiProject Economics~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject Economics\|importance=Low}}
	{{WikiProject Globalization~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Mid}}		{{WikiProject Globalization\|importance=Mid}}
	{{WikiProject Philosophy\|ethics=yes~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Low}}		{{WikiProject Philosophy\|ethics=yes\|importance=Low}}
	{{WikiProject Trade~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=Mid}}		{{WikiProject Trade\|importance=Mid}}
	}}		}}
	{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:Race to the bottom/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}		{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:Race to the bottom/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}

	== Bias ==

	This article reads from a very leftist perspective, thanks in large part to relying upon left-wing sources. There are important game theory applications of this term and nowhere does this discuss the "Delaware Effect" (opposite of the "California Effect" which has been called "race to the top" before Obama lifted the term). I imagine one could make a ] argument to have this deleted. <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 19:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

	:Probably from your perspective, the very thing, the concept of a race to the bottom is left biased. Certainly the notion that wages are low is a left perspective, by rightist perspective they can't be too low, the lower the better for "entrepreneurship". Contrary to what you say, the main space text and much of the back matter make clear the opposite is the case (the immediately prior comment is an (accurate if inarticulate) exception). I have corrected this by at least making clear what the metaphor is about. The ubiquity of right wing perspectives, while in rapid decay from the pile up of its effects, allows such obvious glaring mistakes of fact. ] (]) 06:04, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

	::The clarification I've added to the lede was stimulated by the tagging which is justified by the right wing obfuscation of the meaning of the term just referred to. I would remove the tag but the body of the article still so solidly reflects that obfuscation that it is still justified. ] (]) 09:48, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

	== This is not an example of "race to the bottom" NOT the definition. ==


	The entire article is predicated on an article called "racing to the bottom". This is a mistake, because that article may be an example of race to the bottom, but it is not the definition.

	The term "race to the bottom" has always included inter- and intra-company decisions that among many things involve the decisions to lower quality in order to compete in volume. It's actually a fairly economically terrifying dynamic playing out today, and this article is only confusing people.
	] (]) 12:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)