Revision as of 15:07, 8 July 2024 editJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 edits →Added more information from the source: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:43, 5 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,841,742 editsm merge blp/living/activepol params into blp=activepol; cleanupTag: AWB |
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{British English|date=December 2019}} |
|
{{British English|date=December 2019}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|living=yes|listas=Davies-Jones, Alex|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=activepol|class=Start|listas=Davies-Jones, Alex|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-priority=low|politician-work-group=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-priority=low|politician-work-group=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|importance=low}} |
Line 6: |
Line 6: |
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
{{WikiProject Socialism|importance=}} |
|
{{WikiProject Socialism|importance=}} |
|
| blp=yes |
|
|
| activepol=yes |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
Line 19: |
Line 17: |
|
|
|
|
|
Given that the two are out on bail now, and given that this appears to have only appeared in a single source, I'm also open to the argument, raised first by @Speederzzz in an edit comment, that this is ]. But for now I just thought it best to include full information from the source so that people looking into this will have an easier time getting to the full context. ] (]) 15:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
Given that the two are out on bail now, and given that this appears to have only appeared in a single source, I'm also open to the argument, raised first by @Speederzzz in an edit comment, that this is ]. But for now I just thought it best to include full information from the source so that people looking into this will have an easier time getting to the full context. ] (]) 15:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Even though there (still) appears to be only a single source, it nevertheless provides crucial context. I'd make the argument that it matters ''more'' for that reason alone; without this solitary reference, it would appear their arrests were plainly unjustified ("arrested just for posting a video" as you said). If her filing of a police complaint is to remain in the article, so should the quote from the police – whether there's a single reliable source or fifty. <span style="border: 1px solid red; padding: 2px;">]</span> 20:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC) |
There may be some kind of difference - I would imagine so anyway, since the organisation appears to use both terms quite specifically. This bit got reverted back to "member" - which disagrees with the source - probably by accident, as the revert was really about the longer section with information sourced from nation.cymru - my edit is not about that discussion, although after research I may weigh in on that as well. Jimbo Wales (talk) 14:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Regarding the arrest of two people, I added a quote from the source of the actual police statement. Our incomplete report suggested that the two were arrested just for posting a video whereas the police quote specifically mentions harassment, public order offenses, and criminal damage.
Given that the two are out on bail now, and given that this appears to have only appeared in a single source, I'm also open to the argument, raised first by @Speederzzz in an edit comment, that this is WP:UNDUE. But for now I just thought it best to include full information from the source so that people looking into this will have an easier time getting to the full context. Jimbo Wales (talk) 15:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)