Misplaced Pages

Talk:Alex Davies-Jones: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:36, 14 December 2019 editPamD (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers206,040 edits banners  Latest revision as of 16:43, 5 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,842,250 editsm merge blp/living/activepol params into blp=activepol; cleanupTag: AWB 
(16 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{British English|date=December 2019}}
{{WP Bio|living=yes|listas=Davies-Jones, Alex}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=activepol|class=Start|listas=Davies-Jones, Alex|1=
{{WP UK Politics}}
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-priority=low|politician-work-group=yes}}
{{WP Women}}
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Wales|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
{{WikiProject Socialism|importance=}}
}}

== Parliamentary Supporter vs Member ==

There may be some kind of difference - I would imagine so anyway, since the organisation appears to use both terms quite specifically. This bit got reverted back to "member" - which disagrees with the source - probably by accident, as the revert was really about the longer section with information sourced from nation.cymru - my edit is not about that discussion, although after research I may weigh in on that as well. ] (]) 14:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

== Added more information from the source ==

Regarding the arrest of two people, I added a quote from the source of the actual police statement. Our incomplete report suggested that the two were arrested just for posting a video whereas the police quote specifically mentions harassment, public order offenses, and criminal damage.

Given that the two are out on bail now, and given that this appears to have only appeared in a single source, I'm also open to the argument, raised first by @Speederzzz in an edit comment, that this is ]. But for now I just thought it best to include full information from the source so that people looking into this will have an easier time getting to the full context. ] (]) 15:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

:Even though there (still) appears to be only a single source, it nevertheless provides crucial context. I'd make the argument that it matters ''more'' for that reason alone; without this solitary reference, it would appear their arrests were plainly unjustified ("arrested just for posting a video" as you said). If her filing of a police complaint is to remain in the article, so should the quote from the police – whether there's a single reliable source or fifty. <span style="border: 1px solid red; padding: 2px;">]</span> 20:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:43, 5 November 2024

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconPolitics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWales Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
WikiProject iconSocialism
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Parliamentary Supporter vs Member

There may be some kind of difference - I would imagine so anyway, since the organisation appears to use both terms quite specifically. This bit got reverted back to "member" - which disagrees with the source - probably by accident, as the revert was really about the longer section with information sourced from nation.cymru - my edit is not about that discussion, although after research I may weigh in on that as well. Jimbo Wales (talk) 14:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Added more information from the source

Regarding the arrest of two people, I added a quote from the source of the actual police statement. Our incomplete report suggested that the two were arrested just for posting a video whereas the police quote specifically mentions harassment, public order offenses, and criminal damage.

Given that the two are out on bail now, and given that this appears to have only appeared in a single source, I'm also open to the argument, raised first by @Speederzzz in an edit comment, that this is WP:UNDUE. But for now I just thought it best to include full information from the source so that people looking into this will have an easier time getting to the full context. Jimbo Wales (talk) 15:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Even though there (still) appears to be only a single source, it nevertheless provides crucial context. I'd make the argument that it matters more for that reason alone; without this solitary reference, it would appear their arrests were plainly unjustified ("arrested just for posting a video" as you said). If her filing of a police complaint is to remain in the article, so should the quote from the police – whether there's a single reliable source or fifty. GhostOfNoMeme 20:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Categories: