| Revision as of 01:02, 6 July 2016 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,291,509 editsm Archiving 48 discussion(s) to Talk:Bharatanatyam/Archive 1) (bot← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:05, 7 November 2024 edit undo223.178.212.117 (talk) →padma not cover in this: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic |
| (36 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Art|class=C}} |
|
|
{{WP India|class=C|importance=top|karnataka=yes|karnataka-importance=low|tamilnadu=yes|tamilnadu-importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject India |importance=Top |karnataka=yes |karnataka-importance=High |tamilnadu=yes |tamilnadu-importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Dance|importance=high|class=C}} |
|
{{WikiProject Dance|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Hinduism|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Visual arts }} |
|
|
}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{Aan}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{Aan}} |
| Line 13: |
Line 16: |
|
{{Archive box|search=yes|auto=yes}} |
|
{{Archive box|search=yes|auto=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== padma not cover in this == |
|
==Comments moved from ]== |
|
|
Under attack from users Water Fish and Rrjanbiah who indiscriminately erase (but do not add anything) <b>all external links section<b>. The external links contain highly relevant, unique and valuable resources (text, photo and web video). ----] 20:27, 15 Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
The so called <b>]</b> and <b>]</b> are advertisement and partisan promotion of a dancer named ]. Such spam cannot be used as a link in the wikipedia. The wikipedia is not a platform for advertisement and promotions. The purpose of these links is to promote the sales of cds and a young performer who is not even a major dancer. |
|
|
|
|
|
the ] has probably been created by the same author, it is very easy to create several links to a spam on the wikipedia. One should not be deceived by them. |
|
|
|
|
|
the user id ], ], ] ], ], ] were all created since 13th november 2004. It seems they are all created by the same person who has done considerable vandalism from 219.65.124.***; |
|
|
|
|
|
By definition, linking to webpages devoted to the promotion of a single dancer is spam. It is surely not helpful and is definitely advertisement. Moreover the wikipedia gives bibliography to textbooks dealing with topics. These <b>Reference textbooks</b> are not spam, they are treatise on a subject. |
|
|
|
|
|
listing on open directory or Looksmart page or Google and professional directories like Narthaki.com, can be done, it is never taken as a criterion to validate authenticity or to be listed on an encyclopaedia. Misplaced Pages is well aware of such acts by people to legitimise their personal views. ] 19:48, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
|
Rrjanbiah/Water Fish, |
|
|
why do you delete wholesale <b>the whole secion<b> of the external links? <b>Most of these links |
|
|
have nothing to do with Medha Hari.<b> |
|
|
I personally added a link to the <b>Mudra's web site<b> that you erased. |
|
|
So, what is the point? |
|
|
The point is that Rrjanbiah-Water Fish erases everything wholesale. |
|
|
Myself, I never 'deleted the reference texts'. |
|
|
|
|
|
] 02:59, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
{| |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| width=150px bgcolor=red|Hey, ],] || width=500px bgcolor=white|did you realize that 13th november was because normal people, who work on weekdays, may like to browse the Web on weekends???? |
|
|
|} |
|
|
] 04:36, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Tagging== |
|
|
The author is blatantly sticking to his cooked up theories and more cheeky, is accusing me of vandalism. I am new to wiki and didnt know of the talk page when i made my first few edits. Later I have discussed my concerns on the talk page too...but have met with stubborn silence. Hence tagging this page.<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 2006-01-26t03:59:29z (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
Issue being discussed |
|
|
*the author provides spurious 'proof' in the name of two links to advance his baseless argument tha BN originated in TN. my concerns vis a vis this so called 'proof' or links which supposedly 'seal' the deal are somewhere below on this page.<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 2006-01-26t04:03:54z (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
===VANDALISM!!!=== |
|
|
|
|
|
STOP IT!!! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!! ****PROVE**** TO ME BN ORIGINATED IN TN...I DONT CARE FOR "ALL THE BOOKS" U READ!!! THE LINK YOU HAVE GIVEN IS BULLSHIT!!! YES BULLSHIT!!! WIKI IS NOT YOUR PRIVATE BATHROOM TO ATTRIBUTE EVERYTHING THAT IS GOOD TO TAMIL/TAMILIANS/TAMILNADU!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
THE LINK THAT YOU HAVE GIVEN AND WHICH YOU SAY 'SEALS' THE MATTER, DOESNT SPEAK A WORD ABOUT BN'S ORIGINS!!! I AM REVERTING THIS AND IF YOU TELL ME ITS VANDALISM AM GOING TO THE ADMINS!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
WHEN I CHANGED IT THE FIRS TIME U SAID I HAVE TO DISCUSS IT IN THE TALK PAGE BEFORE I REVERT....THEN I CAME AND POSTED IN THE TALK PAGE TOO. NO REPLY FROM YOU...THEN I CHANGED THE ARTICLE AND YOU COME AND TELL ME ITS VANDALISM!!! GO TAKE A JUMP!!<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 2006-01-25t10:14:59z (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Slapping a hoax tag on a page is not an appropriate action because you disagree with one statement on it == |
|
|
<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 2006-02-06t01:33:53z (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Languages Used== |
|
|
bharatanatya is performed to karnatic(karnataka) music...and karnatic music was formulated and given a shape/grammar/syntax by the great Kannada saint and Father of Indian Classical Music, Shri. Puranadara Dasa...and Purandara Dasa composed *solely* in Kannada....<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 2006-02-09t08:18:18z (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
STOP MAKING BASELESS CLAIMS IN FAVOUR OF TAMIL... |
|
|
|
|
|
while i do not disagree that tamil is also one of the languages used in bharatanatya, the claim that tamil is the language that is 'predominantly' used is probablly incorrect!! Avoid making incorrect claims... (Provide citations as needed)<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 2006-09-22t15:56:35z (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
== I guess anyone would like to take credit for this ancient art == |
|
|
For the past 20 years i always taught Bharatanatyam was one of Thamils |
|
|
greatest cultural contribution to Indian culture. I guess nationalism,or better southern nationalism, wins. |
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.tamilnation.org/culture/dance/index.htm <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 2006-03-07t10:27:49z (UTC{{{3|}}})</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
== 'Among courtesan classes' == |
|
|
|
|
|
What are 'courtesan classes' in India? The word 'courtesan' is not a synonym of "courtly".] (]) 12:50, 17 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
:It should be linked to ] but I guess during some copyedit of the past the link or term was replaced. —]''']''' 13:52, 17 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Requested move 17 June 2016 == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top --> |
|
|
:''The following is a closed discussion of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ]. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
|
|
|
|
|
The result of the move request was: '''moved''' as proposed. ]] 10:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] → {{no redirect|Bharatanatyam}} – Bharatanatyam is the more common name. While Encyclopedia Britannica seems to prefer the , they are mostly alone. The earlier move to this name didn't seem to attract any attention, so it happened by default, therefore I'm requesting a move back to the original title. The following table is a comparison of some sources in the different variants of English. Also, MOS:TIES should be applicable here as this is a topic that has a significant tie to the country (India). India's national academy of music and dance -- ] uses almost exclusively. —]''']''' 14:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC) <small>''Relisted''. ] (]) 07:38, 25 June 2016 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
Adding a comparison table: |
|
|
{| class="wikitable" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
! Source |
|
|
! English variant |
|
|
! Usage for Bharata Natyam |
|
|
! Usage for Bharatanatyam |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| ] (]) |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| ] (]) |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|} |
|
|
That should be about enough for now. —]''']''' 14:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
padma not cover in this ] (]) 18:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
*'''Relisting comment'''. Nominator makes a very good case and if this goes another week without any participation it will be moved, but seeing as this has been discussed several times in the past I thought it best to give it another week. ] (]) 07:38, 25 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
---- |
|
|
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a ]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> |
|
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
