| Revision as of 09:10, 14 November 2004 editJuliaJ (talk | contribs)13 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:05, 7 November 2024 edit undo223.178.212.117 (talk) →padma not cover in this: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic |
| (374 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
==Common spellings== |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject India |importance=Top |karnataka=yes |karnataka-importance=High |tamilnadu=yes |tamilnadu-importance=Top}} |
|
Here is a result of Google searches for common misspellings of the name. This will be useful if in future there's a debate on whether this article needs to be redirected to any other spelling. Also if any other titles need to be redirected to this article. Search done on Aug 6. ] 16:46, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Dance|importance=High}} |
|
<table> |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Hinduism|importance=Mid}} |
|
<tr><td>"bharata natyam" <td align="right"> 20,100 |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Visual arts }} |
|
<tr><td> bharatanatyam <td align="right"> 17,300 |
|
|
|
}} |
|
<tr><td> bharathanatyam <td align="right"> 8,520 |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
<tr><td> bharatnatyam <td align="right"> 7,280 |
|
|
|
|archiveheader = {{Aan}} |
|
<tr><td>"bharat natyam" <td align="right"> 3,700 |
|
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 500K |
|
<tr><td>"bharatha natyam" <td align="right"> 3,210 |
|
|
|
|counter = 1 |
|
<tr><td> bharathnatyam <td align="right"> 428 |
|
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
<tr><td>"bharata nathyam" <td align="right"> 94 |
|
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
<tr><td>"bharath natyam" <td align="right"> 89 |
|
|
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
<tr><td>"bharatha nathyam" <td align="right"> 38 |
|
|
|
|archive = Talk:Bharatanatyam/Archive %(counter)d |
|
<tr><td>"bharat nathyam" <td align="right"> 19 |
|
|
|
}} |
|
<tr><td> bharatanathyam <td align="right"> 14 |
|
|
|
{{Archive box|search=yes|auto=yes}} |
|
<tr><td> bharathanathyam <td align="right"> 5 |
|
|
<tr><td> bharatnathyam <td align="right"> 4 |
|
|
</table> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== padma not cover in this == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
padma not cover in this ] (]) 18:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
---- |
|
|
Yahoo search for |
|
|
<table> |
|
|
<tr><td> bharatnatyam <td align="right"> 54,600 |
|
|
<tr><td> "bharata natyam" <td align="right"> 35,600 |
|
|
<tr><td> bharatanatyam <td align="right"> 33,300 |
|
|
<tr><td> bharathanatyam <td align="right"> 26,400 |
|
|
</table> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Medha Hari == |
|
|
|
|
|
Never heard of this name. Also, why this ugly/advertising image is added here? --] 09:55, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Dear Rrjanbiah, |
|
|
:You need to learn more about the contemporary Bharatanatyam. And the picture is not at all ugly. -- 10:10, 8 Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
But, it definitely looks like a ]. The content of the articles and the pages linked to it seems to confirm that. --] 07:13, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rrjanbiah,|Medha Hari web site pages provide non-commercial information for FREE |
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Rrjanbiah! I looked in major directories (Open Directory, Looksmart, etc) and Medha Hari is listed there. Keep yourself updated. |
|
|
] 04:20, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== From Tamil Nadu? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Is Bharatanatyam orginated from Tamil Nadu? Someone at ] added so. --] 10:01, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Dear Rrjanbiah, |
|
|
:It appears that you are not familiar with Bharatanatyam at all - 10:07, 8 Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK, Bharathanatyam is a Telugu devadasi dance which was commercialized by brahmins like Rukmani Devi. But, neither this article nor any other artcile seems to say that it is Tamilians' dance. --] 07:28, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
Partisan advertisement and promotional campaign on behalf of medha hari is clearly visible by the link and image of medha hari being put up on the page. In order that neutrality is attained such partisan publicity should not be overlooked. Is wikipedia an advertising platform ? ] 11:37, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
For Rrjanbiah: you are Telugu, aren't you? - there is no place for nationalism on Misplaced Pages |
|
|
|
|
|
For Water Fish: |
|
|
I do not perceive adding relevant content as SPAM. |
|
|
External links are supported for enriching elements (such as the multimedia content). |
|
|
Before deleting anything, you better think of the benefit of the reader: will the photo be a valuable illustration? Will external links be a valuable extention of Misplaced Pages? --] |
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with Ralph |
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
==Advertisement vandalism== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, 219.65.124.*** also called as ], also called as ] also called as ]. It is incredible to make three user pages within a span of 24 hours. People in the wikipedia knows how vandals operate. One is allowed to have multiple id but not to lobby for their own views or advertisement. |
|
|
|
|
|
By definition, linking to webpages devoted to the promotion of a single dancer is spam. It is surely not helpful and is definitely advertisement. Moreover the wikipedia gives bibliography to textbooks dealing with topics. These <b>Reference textbooks</b> are not spam, they are treatise on a subject. |
|
|
|
|
|
listing on open directory or Looksmart page or Google and professional directories like Narthaki.com, can be done, it is never taken as a criterion to validate authenticity or to be listed on an encyclopaedia. Misplaced Pages is well aware of such acts by people to legitimise their personal views. |
|
|
|
|
|
Besides being featured 3 or more times in a newspaper or television is not a criterion to be on an encyclopedia. Many major newspapers and TV channels throughout the world promote young dancers by writing and presenting about them more than one time. if one was to make encyclopedia article about all of them, then they do not even qualify half as much as the virtuosos from conservatories around the world. But wikipedia does not entertain articles even about those virtuosos from great universities. |
|
|
|
|
|
Medha Hari is probably a young dancer, and definitely not a major dancer. If that is enough criterion to be written about on the wikipedia, then in that case every music student in ] and music conservatories and ballets would have to be written about, and that is definitely not meant for the wikipedia. ] 06:25, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deleting other users' comments is inappropriate. |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: "linking to webpages devoted to the promotion of a single dancer is spam" |
|
|
|
|
|
I guess it is not "promotion": the first link gives an extended overview of the subject matter, and the second link provides the free video illustrations to the article. |
|
|
|
|
|
I welcome ] to list other 13-year-old Bharatanatyam "virtuosos from conservatories around the world" if he cares to find any: with the details info on their style and online videos. |
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to say that ] is not familiar with the topic. |
|
|
The classical dance column in the national newspaper the Hindu is similar to the Dance Magazine. Any 13-year-old dancer who is reviewed 3 times in the Dance Magazine would be worthy of being listed on Misplaced Pages. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] 09:06, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
|
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
