Misplaced Pages

Talk:Dice: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:14, 10 June 2022 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,709 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Dice/Archive 2) (bot← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:20, 8 November 2024 edit undo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,549 edits Probability theory: ReplyTag: Reply 
(24 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}} {{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|archive_age=90|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} {{Talk header}}
{{Vital article
| topic = Life
| level = 4
| class = C
}}
{{Article history {{Article history
| action1 = FAC | action1 = FAC
Line 30: Line 25:
| topic = sports | topic = sports
}} }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1 = {{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1 =
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|old-user-1=Quadell|old-date-1=13:47, 29 September 2013|old-user-2=Greatpopcorn|old-date-2= 01:13, 13 November 2013}} {{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|old-user-1=Quadell|old-date-1=13:47, 29 September 2013|old-user-2=Greatpopcorn|old-date-2= 01:13, 13 November 2013}}
{{WikiProject Board and table games|class=B|importance=Top}} {{WikiProject Board and table games|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Role-playing games|class=B|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Role-playing games|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons {{WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons| importance = Mid}}
| class = B
| importance = Mid
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = no
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no>
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no>
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = <yes/no>}}
{{WP1.0
| class =
B
| importance =
Low
| b1 =
| b2 =
| b3 =
| b4 =
| b5 =
| b6 =
| category =
everydaylife
| WPCD =
| v0.5 =
| v0.7 =
pass
| v1.0 =
| VA =
| core =
| coresup =
| listas =
| small =
}}
}} }}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 131: Line 41:
}} }}


== "Infinite" sets of dice == == fair and less fair ==

How about splitting the "Rarer" table into isohedral (including "long" dice) and other? ] (]) 05:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

:I'm curious how that would look. ] (]) 13:07, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
::Most of the non-isohedral dice have the word "truncated" in the table. All ]s, all ]s and ], and (effectively) all long dice are isohedral. ] (]) 05:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

== Die or Dice ==

For articles like ], ], ] and many others, the article title is singular, though several of the objects are usually used together.

For dice, the singular can be ''die'' or ''dice'' and the plural is ''dice''. Thus, the title ] could be either, but the start of the article makes it seem to be plural:
:'''''Dice''' (sg.: '''die''' or '''dice''') are small, throwable objects ...''
(my point being: this only makes sense if the first word is understood as plural).
This is kind of odd, I think. Would this be better?
:''A '''die''' (sg. die or '''dice''', pl. '''dice''') is a small, throwable object ...
Logically, one might say this should go with renaming the article ], but I wouldn't support renaming.
Also, given title ], this would be more logical:
:''A '''dice''' (sg. dice or '''die''', pl. '''dice''') is a small, throwable object ...
but I actually prefer my first version. Or perhaps this:
:''A '''die''' (sg. also '''dice''', pl. '''dice''') is a small, throwable object ...
Thoughts? ] (]) 08:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)


:I support: A '''dice''' ({{singular}} dice or ''' die'''; {{plural form}} dice) is a small, throwable object... <span style="font-family:cursive;color:DarkBlue;cursor:help"><span>]</span><sup>(])</sup></span> 08:29, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
I don't think disphenoids can be described as an infinite set, since surely they are all the same shape but with different dimensions. Bipyramids and similar sets clearly are infinite sets, since even though they have different dimensions they also have different numbers of faces. ] (]) 15:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
::That would be logical, yes!
:It seems disphenoids can be inscribed in a rectangular box with a square base. The height of the box, relative to the side of the base, is a shape parameter - not merely a dimension. So I've undone your edit. PS: See image at ].--] (]) 19:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
::Arguably, with that lead, it would be odd that we throughout the article use the singular '''die''', and I don't think we should change that, which is why I prefer "A die (...) is".
::(We use "die" 73 times and "dice" 129 times, and though I haven't checked all 129 instances, it seems that when we use "dice" it is either plural or dice as a concept, where using the plural form is at least possible.) ] (]) 10:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
:::Only idiots use dice as a singular.--] (]) (]) 18:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
::::Why would you want to be so rude? Both forms are correct. ] (]) 16:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)


== Where, if at all, to put basic stat info for nDs dice ==
== Uncommon odd-numbered dice ==


A while back, related to some research I was doing, I needed to gather some basic info about the results you get when rolling nDs+c and nDs-c dice -- It discussed the minimum value, maximum value, and most likely value(s) you get for particular nm s and c, including when the adjusted rolls would result in a negative value. This info has been useful for my fellow gamers, and I think it would be of interest to other d20 players, as well as those interested in dice probability, and perhaps probability more generally. As far as I was able to discover, this info is not grouped together in one place on the Web -- or, if it is, I could not find after a lot of googling.
There seems to be little mention of less commonly manufactured dice in higher odd-numbered ranges, such as They are uncommon, seemingly existing for novelty, but many of them are not described or listed on the page, and deserve, IMO, mention due to their rarity and the unique challenges of making odd-numbered dice.


I've been told by a knowledgeable editor that such info is too detailed for the Dice page. Dice Notation was suggested as a location for it, but that page is about (several different) dice notations, and doesn't really get into the probability behavior of info related to them (sensible; the page is about notation, not stats). It also seems inappropriate to place this info on its own page; seems too detailed for that. So, I'd like the community's input: Is there an appropriate page for this info? Should it be on a new page after all? Or it is just too esoteric to be in Misplaced Pages?
] (]) 23:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
:Those are covered in the "Rarer variations" subsection, as they're just versions of many of those dice with more rounded edges. ] (]) 03:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


Many thanks for your advice! ] (]) 23:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
== Dice (Die) Probability 1-out-of-6 ==


== Probability theory ==
I tweaked... They are used for generating seemingly ] (])... When thrown or rolled, the die comes to rest showing a '''1-out-of-6 probability'''. ] (]) 13:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


Obviously, ] is not something we should get into detalis about in this article. However, I think one, reading this article, should be no more than a click or two away from getting info about the relevant probability theory when throwing e.g. two identical dice, or two differently coloured dice, simultaneously. Perhaps it can be fixed by adding an appropriate link in the section ], but I'm not sure how, or what to link. Ideas? ] (]) 12:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
== References to the dice found at the Burnt City ==


:I added a brief paragraph to the "Use" section, linking to probability theory. I agree, it should be somewhere in the article, and this looked like a good spot to me. ] (]) 06:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
As has been stated in other forums, both on Misplaced Pages and elsewhere on the interwebs, the claim/dating of the dice found in the Burnt city, also known as Shahr-i Sokhta, is not supported and is controversial in nature. The citations used in this article also do not support this claim. It should either be removed from the article entirely or it should be flagged as an unverified claim. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::Thanks! ] (]) 08:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:20, 8 November 2024

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dice article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
Former good articleDice was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 22, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 28, 2005Good article nomineeListed
April 22, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
Previous copyedits:
Note icon
This article was copy edited by Quadell on 13:47, 29 September 2013.
Note icon
This article was copy edited by Greatpopcorn on 01:13, 13 November 2013.
WikiProject iconBoard and table games Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRole-playing games High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDungeons & Dragons Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
D&D to-do:

view


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

fair and less fair

How about splitting the "Rarer" table into isohedral (including "long" dice) and other? —Tamfang (talk) 05:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

I'm curious how that would look. BOZ (talk) 13:07, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Most of the non-isohedral dice have the word "truncated" in the table. All Catalan solids, all bipyramids and trapezohedra, and (effectively) all long dice are isohedral. —Tamfang (talk) 05:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Die or Dice

For articles like Token, Chess piece, Coin and many others, the article title is singular, though several of the objects are usually used together.

For dice, the singular can be die or dice and the plural is dice. Thus, the title Dice could be either, but the start of the article makes it seem to be plural:

Dice (sg.: die or dice) are small, throwable objects ...

(my point being: this only makes sense if the first word is understood as plural). This is kind of odd, I think. Would this be better?

A die (sg. die or dice, pl. dice) is a small, throwable object ...

Logically, one might say this should go with renaming the article Die, but I wouldn't support renaming. Also, given title Dice, this would be more logical:

A dice (sg. dice or die, pl. dice) is a small, throwable object ...

but I actually prefer my first version. Or perhaps this:

A die (sg. also dice, pl. dice) is a small, throwable object ...

Thoughts? (talk) 08:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

I support: A dice (sg. dice or die; pl. dice) is a small, throwable object... Alexeyevitch 08:29, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
That would be logical, yes!
Arguably, with that lead, it would be odd that we throughout the article use the singular die, and I don't think we should change that, which is why I prefer "A die (...) is".
(We use "die" 73 times and "dice" 129 times, and though I haven't checked all 129 instances, it seems that when we use "dice" it is either plural or dice as a concept, where using the plural form is at least possible.) (talk) 10:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Only idiots use dice as a singular.--User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 18:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Why would you want to be so rude? Both forms are correct. (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Where, if at all, to put basic stat info for nDs dice

A while back, related to some research I was doing, I needed to gather some basic info about the results you get when rolling nDs+c and nDs-c dice -- It discussed the minimum value, maximum value, and most likely value(s) you get for particular nm s and c, including when the adjusted rolls would result in a negative value. This info has been useful for my fellow gamers, and I think it would be of interest to other d20 players, as well as those interested in dice probability, and perhaps probability more generally. As far as I was able to discover, this info is not grouped together in one place on the Web -- or, if it is, I could not find after a lot of googling.

I've been told by a knowledgeable editor that such info is too detailed for the Dice page. Dice Notation was suggested as a location for it, but that page is about (several different) dice notations, and doesn't really get into the probability behavior of info related to them (sensible; the page is about notation, not stats). It also seems inappropriate to place this info on its own page; seems too detailed for that. So, I'd like the community's input: Is there an appropriate page for this info? Should it be on a new page after all? Or it is just too esoteric to be in Misplaced Pages?

Many thanks for your advice! Eclectucator (talk) 23:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Probability theory

Obviously, probability theory is not something we should get into detalis about in this article. However, I think one, reading this article, should be no more than a click or two away from getting info about the relevant probability theory when throwing e.g. two identical dice, or two differently coloured dice, simultaneously. Perhaps it can be fixed by adding an appropriate link in the section Dice#Use, but I'm not sure how, or what to link. Ideas? (talk) 12:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

I added a brief paragraph to the "Use" section, linking to probability theory. I agree, it should be somewhere in the article, and this looked like a good spot to me. Fieari (talk) 06:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! (talk) 08:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Categories: