Misplaced Pages

Institute of National Remembrance: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:11, 24 April 2007 view sourceVlad fedorov (talk | contribs)4,845 edits →Support of IPN in Jaceck Kuronia affair← Previous edit Revision as of 20:32, 24 April 2007 view source Piotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,696 edits copyedit, npov - thanks Biophys, although some of Vlad's additions are worth keepingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{totallydisputed}}
] ]
'''Institute of National Remembrance — Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation''' ({{lang-pl|Instytut Pamięci Narodowej — Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu}}; '''IPN''') is a ]-affiliated ] specializing in recent ] and ].<ref name="resinst"></ref> '''Institute of National Remembrance — Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation''' ({{lang-pl|Instytut Pamięci Narodowej — Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu}}; '''IPN''') is a ]-affiliated ] specializing in recent ] and ].<ref name="resinst"></ref>
Line 31: Line 30:


The current chairman is ], elected on ] ] (term started ] ]). The current chairman is ], elected on ] ] (term started ] ]).

Elections of new IPN president in December 2005 were accompanied with ] scandal. Janosz Kurtyka, current IPN president, was rivaled by Andrzej Przewoznik, also historian from Krakow Jaggielonian University. But Przewoznik was discredited by suddenly appeared documents which were confirming his connections with secret services. The scandal was aggravated by the fact, that these documents were coming from Krakow IPN unit, which was headed by Przewoznik himself.<ref name="ogoniek">Magazine] editorial №7, 12-18 February, 2007</ref>.


The IPN is divided into:<ref name="IPNabout"/> The IPN is divided into:<ref name="IPNabout"/>
Line 46: Line 43:
*Poles and Other Nations in the Years 1939-1989 (with a part on Poles and Ukrainians); *Poles and Other Nations in the Years 1939-1989 (with a part on Poles and Ukrainians);
*Peasants vis-a-vis People's Authority 1944-1989 (on the situation of peasants and the rural policy in the years 1944-1989) *Peasants vis-a-vis People's Authority 1944-1989 (on the situation of peasants and the rural policy in the years 1944-1989)
*].

Current lustration by IPN is obligatory for all teachers, journalists, diplomats, ministers, members of parliament, public notaries, local government officials and judges. Each year IPN issues 40 000 certificates for individuals confirming their status as individuals "''which never cooperated with secret services''". In January, 2005, the rightist journalist Bronislav Vildstein copied from IPN computer the list of 240 000 individuals and published it on the internet. <ref name="ogoniek">Magazine] editorial №7, 12-18 February, 2007</ref>.

IPN also censured popular in Poland movie "''Four tankmen and a dog''".<ref name="akopyan"> Albert Akopyan , 16 March 2007, GlobalRus analytical journal</ref>


Among the most widely reported case investigated by the IPN thus far is the ]. Other cases include: Among the most widely reported case investigated by the IPN thus far is the ]. Other cases include:
Line 79: Line 71:
] refers to the partial list of names of people persecuted by communist government and its agents which was illegaly carried out from IPN archives in 2004 by journalist ] and published in the Internet in 2005. The list gained much attention in Polish media and politics, and during that time IPN security procedures and handling of the matter were criticized.<ref name="Wild">Wojciech Czuchnowski, '''', ], last accessed on 12 May 2006</ref> ] refers to the partial list of names of people persecuted by communist government and its agents which was illegaly carried out from IPN archives in 2004 by journalist ] and published in the Internet in 2005. The list gained much attention in Polish media and politics, and during that time IPN security procedures and handling of the matter were criticized.<ref name="Wild">Wojciech Czuchnowski, '''', ], last accessed on 12 May 2006</ref>


===Use of IPN by the government of Poland=== ===Elections of the IPN president===
Elections of new IPN president in December 2005 were also criticized. ], current IPN president, was rivaled by ], a historian from ]. Przewoźnik candidature received a sever blow documents were found indicating he had connections with secret services. Przewoźnik was eventually cleared from he accusations, but in the meantime he lost the IPN elections.<ref name="PAPKP">{{pl icon}} , ], 13 December 2005, last accessed on 20 April 2007</ref>

===Use of IPN by the government===
One of the most controversial aspects of IPN is a byproduct of their organizing of previously secret archives of Polish security apparatus: revealing secret agents and collaborators (a process called '']'')<ref name="ChicTrib"/> One of the most controversial aspects of IPN is a byproduct of their organizing of previously secret archives of Polish security apparatus: revealing secret agents and collaborators (a process called '']'')<ref name="ChicTrib"/>


⚫ In 2006 and 2007 the use of IPN by the ] - primarily the ruling ] party - came under criticism by some journalists and politicians. One of the major policy changes of the PiS party was to raise the issue of unresolved crimes from the times of communist ]. The critics of the government noted the abandonment of the '']'' policy, which is forcing of all politicians, civil servants and others in positions of public trust to undergo a background check by the IPN.<ref name="ChicTrib">Tom Hundley, , 1 December 2006, ]</ref> Since the results of those background checks are public, it is alledged that the motive of the PiS government is not justice but a smear campaign on their opposition. Further, IPN itself has been criticized for reliance on possibly falsified documents of Polish communist secret police (]).<ref name="newsday"/> In addition to pro-opposition media in Poland, that issue has also been picked by some media outlets outside Poland, such as ], ] or ]. The Guardian drew a parallel to ] in ]<ref name="Guard">Daniel McLaughlin, , Wednesday July 26, 2006, ]</ref> and journalist ] of ] described the events as a political ].<ref name="newsday">Matthew McAllester, , 12 February 2007, ]</ref>
Some of Polish journalists are strong in their evaluation of IPN. Helena Luczivo of Gazeta Wyborcza maintains that "''The use of state security dossiers to discredit and defame political opponents is not a new method. The same weapon was used by communists Gomulka and Gerek and during martial law period in Poland''".<ref name="ogoniek">Magazine] editorial №7, 12-18 February, 2007</ref>.


===Kuroń and Wielgus affairs===
⚫ In 2006 and 2007 the use of IPN by the ] - primarily the ruling ] party - came under criticism by some journalists and politicians. One of the major policy changes of the PiS party was to raise the issue of unresolved crimes from the times of communist ]. The critics of the government noted the abandonment of the '']'' policy, which is forcing of all politicians, civil servants and others in positions of public trust to undergo a background check by the IPN.<ref name="ChicTrib">Tom Hundley, , 1 December 2006, ]</ref> Since the results of those background checks are public, it is alledged that the motive of the PiS government is not justice but a smear campaign on their opposition. Further, IPN itself has been criticized for reliance on possibly falsified documents of Polish communist secret police (]).<ref name="newsday"/> In addition to pro-opposition media in Poland, that issue has also been picked by some media outlets outside Poland, such as ], ] or ]. The Guardian drew a parallel to ] in ]<ref name="Guard">Daniel McLaughlin, , Wednesday July 26, 2006, ]</ref> and journalist ] of ] described the events as a political ].<ref name="newsday">Matthew McAllester, , 12 February 2007, ]</ref>
Much controversy was caused when in late 2006 Polish newspaper '']'' interpreted some of IPN presented alledging that one of the most popular Polish politicians, recently deceaesed ], might have had contacts with the communist secret police. <ref name="ŻW">{{pl icon}} ], 29 August 2006, last accessed on 20 April 2007.</ref> ] of IPN issued a statement that IPN takes no stance in this discussion, and the new documents only contribute to a better understaing of the history of ].<ref name="DUD">{{pl icon}} , ], 29 August 2006, last accessed on 20 April 2007.</ref>
] ]n ] channel, named IPN as "''unofficial ]''".<ref name="NTV"> NTV TV channel news report April 21, 2007</ref> Russian magazine ] reported that IPN is a governmental, and not academic, organization which "''performs criminal prosecution functions''" and "''rewrites history''". ] described IPN as "'']''" referring to George Orwell "1984" novel. <ref name="ogoniek">Magazine] editorial №7, 12-18 February, 2007</ref>. IPN was named by Italian newspaper "La Stampa", "''a factory of national vengeance''".<ref name="ogoniek">Magazine] editorial №7, 12-18 February, 2007</ref>.


Similar controversy was caused after revelation that ], former ], was a communist secret police informer. Archbishop Wielgus is the highest-ranking Church leader to admit that he agreed to spy for an East European communist state.<ref> Catholic News Service, ]</ref>
==Support of IPN in Jaceck Kuronia affair==


Similar documents, catalogued and made public by IPN research, surfaced several in Polish politics, with varying accusations as to what faction of Polish politicians is trying to use them to damage another faction.<ref name="ŻW"/><ref name="DUD"/>


==Response to criticism==
A number of distinguished Solidarity movement memebers, like Jaceck Kuronia, were convicted by IPN, including most recently archbiscup Stanislav Velgus nominated for Warsaw Mithropolit. <ref name="ogoniek">Magazine] editorial №7, 12-18 February, 2007</ref>. After critical publications in Polish press about IPN activities and defamation by IPN of Solidarnosc movement, an ] was published in 2006, declaring that<ref name="PAPdefends">, ] article reprinted on ]. Last accessed on 20 April 2007.</ref> : IPN actions have also attracted support as well. In 2006 an ] was published, declaring that<ref name="PAPdefends">, ] article reprinted on ]. Last accessed on 20 April 2007.</ref> :
<blockquote> <blockquote>
"] and anti-communist opposition in Poland cannot be damaged neither by scientific studies of sources, nor by resulting from it increase in our knowledge of the past. History of anti-totalitarian opposition is a property of millions of Poles and not to one social, or politicial group which usurps the right to decide which parts of national past should be disseminated and which should be silenced". "] and ] cannot be damaged by scientific studies and resulting increase in our knowledge of the past. History of opposition to ] belongs to millions of Poles and not one social or politicial group which usurps the right to decide which parts of national history should be discussed and which forgotten."
</blockquote> </blockquote>


Revision as of 20:32, 24 April 2007

File:IPN logo.jpg
IPN Logo

Institute of National Remembrance — Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation (Template:Lang-pl; IPN) is a Polish government-affiliated research institute specializing in recent history of Poland and legal science.

Its main purpose is investigating Nazi and Communist crimes committed in Poland, documenting them, providing this documentation to the public, prosecuting those who committed such crimes, and educating the public in this respect.

Purpose

IPN goals and mission statement include:

IPN collects, archives and organizes documents of Polish communist security apparatus (22 July 1944 to 31 December 1989).

Organization

IPN was created by a speciall bill on 18 December 1998.

IPN is governed by the Chairman. Chairman is chosen by supermajority (60%) of the Polish parliament (Sejm) with the approval of Senate of Poland on a request by a Collegium of IPN. Chairman has a 5-year term of office.

The first chairman of the IPN was Leon Kieres, elected by the Sejm for five years in 8 June 2000 (term 30 June 2000–29 December 2005).

The current chairman is Janusz Kurtyka, elected on 9 December 2005 (term started 29 December 2005).

The IPN is divided into:

  • Main Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation (Główna Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni Przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu)
  • Bureau of Provision and Archivization of Documents (Biuro Udostępniania i Archiwizacji Dokumentów)
  • Bureau of Public Education (Biuro Edukacji Publicznej)
  • Local chapters

Activities

The research conducted by IPN from December 2000 fall into four main topical areas:

  • Security Apparatus and Civil Resistance (with separate sub-projects devoted to Political Processes and Prisoners 1944-1956, Soviet Repressions and Crimes committed against Polish Citizens and Martial Law: a Glance after Twenty Years);
  • War, Occupation and the Polish Underground;
  • Poles and Other Nations in the Years 1939-1989 (with a part on Poles and Ukrainians);
  • Peasants vis-a-vis People's Authority 1944-1989 (on the situation of peasants and the rural policy in the years 1944-1989)

Among the most widely reported case investigated by the IPN thus far is the Jedwabne Pogrom. Other cases include:

IPN is involved in dissemination of its research results in the form of publications (particulary the "IPN Bulletin"), exhibitions, seminars and in other way. Since December 2000 IPN has organized over 30 academic conferences.

Criticism

Wildstein list

Wildstein list refers to the partial list of names of people persecuted by communist government and its agents which was illegaly carried out from IPN archives in 2004 by journalist Bronisław Wildsein and published in the Internet in 2005. The list gained much attention in Polish media and politics, and during that time IPN security procedures and handling of the matter were criticized.

Elections of the IPN president

Elections of new IPN president in December 2005 were also criticized. Janosz Kurtyka, current IPN president, was rivaled by Andrzej Przewoźnik, a historian from Jagiellonian University. Przewoźnik candidature received a sever blow documents were found indicating he had connections with secret services. Przewoźnik was eventually cleared from he accusations, but in the meantime he lost the IPN elections.

Use of IPN by the government

One of the most controversial aspects of IPN is a byproduct of their organizing of previously secret archives of Polish security apparatus: revealing secret agents and collaborators (a process called lustration)

In 2006 and 2007 the use of IPN by the Polish government - primarily the ruling Prawo i Sprawiedliwość party - came under criticism by some journalists and politicians. One of the major policy changes of the PiS party was to raise the issue of unresolved crimes from the times of communist People's Republic of Poland. The critics of the government noted the abandonment of the thick line policy, which is forcing of all politicians, civil servants and others in positions of public trust to undergo a background check by the IPN. Since the results of those background checks are public, it is alledged that the motive of the PiS government is not justice but a smear campaign on their opposition. Further, IPN itself has been criticized for reliance on possibly falsified documents of Polish communist secret police (Służba Bezpieczeństwa). In addition to pro-opposition media in Poland, that issue has also been picked by some media outlets outside Poland, such as The Guardian, Chicago Tribune or Newsday. The Guardian drew a parallel to McCarthyism in United States and journalist Matthew McAllester of Newsday described the events as a political witch hunt.

Kuroń and Wielgus affairs

Much controversy was caused when in late 2006 Polish newspaper Życie Warszawy interpreted some of IPN presented alledging that one of the most popular Polish politicians, recently deceaesed Jacek Kuroń, might have had contacts with the communist secret police. Antoni Dudek of IPN issued a statement that IPN takes no stance in this discussion, and the new documents only contribute to a better understaing of the history of Polish Roundtable Agreement.

Similar controversy was caused after revelation that Stanisław Wielgus, former Roman Catholic archbishop of Warsaw, was a communist secret police informer. Archbishop Wielgus is the highest-ranking Church leader to admit that he agreed to spy for an East European communist state.

Similar documents, catalogued and made public by IPN research, surfaced several in Polish politics, with varying accusations as to what faction of Polish politicians is trying to use them to damage another faction.

Response to criticism

IPN actions have also attracted support as well. In 2006 an open letter was published, declaring that :

"History of Solidarity and anti-communist resistance in Poland cannot be damaged by scientific studies and resulting increase in our knowledge of the past. History of opposition to totalitarism belongs to millions of Poles and not one social or politicial group which usurps the right to decide which parts of national history should be discussed and which forgotten."

This letter was signed by former Prime Minister of Poland, Jan Olszewski, mayor of Zakopane, Piotr Bąk, Polish-American professor and member of United States Holocaust Memorial Council Marek Jan Chodakiewicz, professors Tomasz Gąsowski, Tomasz Gąsowski, Piotr Franaszek and Maria Dzielska of Jagiellonian University, professor Marek Czachor of Gdańsk University of Technology, journalists and writers Marcin Wolski and Ryszard Kapuściński, Solidarity cofunder Anna Walentynowicz, and dozens of others.

References

  1. ^ Nauka polska: Instytucje naukowe - identyfikator rekordu: i6575
  2. ^ About the Institute From IPN English website. Last accessed on 20 April 2007
  3. Wojciech Czuchnowski, Bronisław Wildstein: człowiek z listą, Gazeta Wyborcza, last accessed on 12 May 2006
  4. Template:Pl icon Olejniczak: Kurtyka powinien zrezygnować, Polish Press Agency, 13 December 2005, last accessed on 20 April 2007
  5. ^ Tom Hundley, Poland looks back in anger, 1 December 2006, Chicago Tribune
  6. ^ Matthew McAllester, Poland's dirty laundry, 12 February 2007, Newsday
  7. Daniel McLaughlin, Fear of McCarthy-style purge as Poles face sack for secret police links, Wednesday July 26, 2006, The Guardian
  8. ^ Template:Pl icon [http://wiadomosci.wp.pl/wiadomosc.html?kat=9912&wid=8480045&rfbawp=1156840986.043 Kuroń prowadził negocjacje z SB, Życie Warszawy, 29 August 2006, last accessed on 20 April 2007.
  9. ^ Template:Pl icon Dudek: dokumenty o negocjacjach Kuronia z SB nie są przełomem, Polish Press Agency, 29 August 2006, last accessed on 20 April 2007.
  10. Archbishop's prompt resignation prompts Vatican embarrassment, relief Catholic News Service, 2007-01-08
  11. ^ List w "obronie historyków z IPN", Polish Press Agency article reprinted on Wirtualna Polska. Last accessed on 20 April 2007.
  12. Copy of a letter, Tezusz, Last accessed on 20 April 2007

External links

Categories: