Misplaced Pages

Rollerball (2002 film): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:15, 23 March 2024 edit2001:fb1:12f:43df:4b1:8daf:353c:8624 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:13, 11 November 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,807 edits Move 2 urls. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#variety.com 
(26 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 43: Line 43:
* ]<ref name="var"/> (Japan) * ]<ref name="var"/> (Japan)
* ] (United States and Canada)<ref name=afi/> * ] (United States and Canada)<ref name=afi/>
* ] (through ]; Worldwide)
}} }}
| released = {{Film date|2002|02|08}} | released = {{Film date|2002|02|08|United States|2002|03|28|Germany|2002|05|11|Japan}}
| runtime = 98 minutes<!--Theatrical runtime: 98:05--><ref name=bbfc>{{cite web | url=https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/rollerball-2002-1 | title=''ROLLERBALL'' (15) | work=] | date=February 14, 2002 | access-date=June 20, 2015}}</ref> | runtime = 98 minutes<!--Theatrical runtime: 98:05--><ref name=bbfc>{{cite web | url=https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/rollerball-2002-1 | title=''ROLLERBALL'' (15) | work=] | date=February 14, 2002 | access-date=June 20, 2015}}</ref>
| country = {{Plainlist| | country = {{Plainlist|
Line 56: Line 55:
| gross = $25.9&nbsp;million<ref name="mojo" /> | gross = $25.9&nbsp;million<ref name="mojo" />
}} }}
'''''Rollerball''''' is a 2002 ] ] directed by ]. A ] of the ], based on ]'s short story ''Roller Ball Murder'', the film stars ], ], ], ] and ]. Unlike the previous film, it has a much greater focus on action, with more muted social and political overtones than the original, and takes place in the present rather than in a future ]n society. '''''Rollerball''''' is a 2002 ] ] directed by ]. A ] of the ], based on ]'s short story ''Roller Ball Murder'', the film stars ], ], ], ] and ].


While both versions of ''Rollerball'' use the same basic premise, the 2002 version has a much greater focus on action sequences, more muted social and political overtones than the original, and takes place in the mid-2000s rather than in a future ]n society.
⚫ ''Rollerball'' was released on February 8, 2002. Upon its release, the film was critically panned, receiving criticism for the lack of the original's social critique. It was a financial disappointment grossing $25.9 million against a production budget of $70&nbsp;million.

⚫ ''Rollerball'' was released on February 8, 2002. Upon its release, the film was critically panned, receiving criticism for the lack of the original's social critique, and was a ], grossing $25.9 million against a production budget of $70&nbsp;million.


==Plot== ==Plot==
⚫ In 2005, the new sport of Rollerball, a ] involving motorcycles and a metal ball, becomes popular in many countries. Marcus Ridley invites the talented sports fanatic Jonathan Cross to join him playing for the Zhambel Horsemen in ]. Jonathan refuses, hoping to try out for the ] in some months. However, after he recklessly skates through his hometown, the police start looking for Jonathan, who is forced to accept Marcus's offer to escape them. The highly paid Marcus and Jonathan are teamed with low-paid locals, who are often severely injured in the game.
{{More plot|date=March 2015}}
⚫ In 2005, the new sport of Rollerball, an extraordinarily ] involving motorcycles and a metal ball, becomes hugely popular in many countries. Marcus Ridley invites ] hopeful Jonathan Cross to join him playing for the Zhambel Horsemen in ]. The highly paid Marcus and Jonathan are teamed with low-paid locals, who are often severely injured in the game.


In the beginning, Jonathan, the team's star player and the poster child of promoter Alexi Petrovich, is enamored by the high-octane sport, the popularity, sports cars, and his female teammate Aurora. But Jonathan and Ridley eventually discover that the cynical Alexi and his opportunistic assistant, Sanjay, have a vested interest in keeping the game as popular as possible, through planned gory "accidents" and ensuring that Jonathan and Ridley cannot quit the team and remain high-profile stars. In the beginning, Jonathan, the team's star player and the poster child of promoter Alexi Petrovich, is enamored by the high-octane sport, the popularity, sports cars, and his female teammate Aurora. The two keep their relationship a secret and refuse to put a stop to rumors that Aurora is a lesbian. During one game, one of their teammates is killed by an opponent, something that is prone to happen in a match. However, the team quickly discovers that that murder might have been planned before the game, as one of the straps of the victim's helmet had been cut and the cameras filming the event seemed ready for the death to happen. Jonathan and Ridley eventually discover that Alexi and his assistant, Sanjay, have a vested interest in keeping the game as popular as possible, through planned gory "accidents" and ensuring that Jonathan and Ridley cannot quit the team and remain high-profile stars. Both the deaths and Jonathan's talent seem to generate upticks in ratings.


After an accident almost kills Aurora, Jonathan and Ridley decide that they need to flee the country to save their lives. The two are followed by Alexi and several bodyguards, who attack the two before they can reach the Russian border. Jonathan is injured and Ridley has to leave him behind. Alexi and his men capture Jonathan and kill Ridley after the latter successfully crosses the border. Jonathan and Ridley pretend to know nothing about this situation, wanting to keep their current lifestyle, but after an "accident" almost kills Aurora, the two friends decide that they need to flee the country to save their lives. Their teammates, including Aurora, cannot join them, though, as they have families there. Jonathan and Marcus are followed by Alexi and several bodyguards, who attack the two before they can reach the Russian border. Jonathan is injured and Ridley has to leave him behind. Alexi and his men capture Jonathan and kill Ridley before the latter can cross the border.


Following the escape attempt, Alexi tries to stage a public execution of Jonathan by removing all the rules from the upcoming Rollerball match, along with trading Aurora to the opposing team (as requested by Jonathan in an attempt to get her away from danger). However, Jonathan, with the help of his teammates, start a revolution, causing the fans to see the sport for what it really is, and ultimately to kill Alexi. Jonathan says that he will keep working for Alexi if Aurora is traded to another team, wanting to keep her away from danger. Alexi complies, secretly transferring Aurora to the opposing team for the next match. Knowing he cannot trust Jonathan anymore, Alexi tries to stage a public execution of him by removing all the rules from the upcoming Rollerball match. The match becomes more violent than ever before, and many players die. However, Jonathan, with the help of players from both teams, starts a revolution, causing the fans to see the sport for what it really is. In a fit of rage, he kills Alexi and Sanjay before reuniting with Aurora.


==Cast== ==Cast==
Line 88: Line 88:
==Production== ==Production==
{{More citations needed section|date=January 2023}} {{More citations needed section|date=January 2023}}
Although the first draft of the script was considered by many{{whom|date=January 2024}} to be very good and even superior to the original film, director ] didn't like it because it focused more on social commentary, while he thought that the audience would like to see more of the Rollerball scenes. He had the original script completely re-written several times and made sure that it focused more on WWE-like showmanship, including crazy costumes and stunts, while changing the film's storyline from a modern-day success story to a classic underdog story and changing the name of the main character in the film from Jonathan E. to Jonathan Cross. Although the first draft of the script was considered by many{{according to whom|date=January 2024}} to be very good and even superior to the original film, director ] didn't like it because it focused more on social commentary, while he thought that the audience would like to see more of the Rollerball scenes. He had the original script completely re-written several times and made sure that it focused more on WWE-like showmanship, including crazy costumes and stunts, while changing the film's storyline from a modern-day success story to a classic underdog story and changing the name of the main character in the film from Jonathan E. to Jonathan Cross.


The movie was filmed in about 15 weeks, between July 24 and November 2000. McTiernan's first cut, which was over two hours long, was test screened in Las Vegas around April or May 2001, and got a very negative response from test audiences. MGM pushed the release date from May to July 13, 2001 to test the movie again, hoping that they would find the right audience for it. The movie was filmed in about 15 weeks, between July 24 and November 2000. McTiernan's first cut, which was over two hours long, was test screened in Las Vegas around April or May 2001, and got a very negative response from test audiences. MGM pushed the release date from May to July 13, 2001 to test the movie again, hoping that they would find the right audience for it.
Line 94: Line 94:
] from '']'' was invited by McTiernan for a test screening of the film in Long Island sometime after the first test screening, and in his review of McTiernan's original cut, Knowles said that the movie was bad, but was at least an unapologetic hard-R film with much nudity and some brutal violence in Rollerball scenes, but even as a workprint it was obvious how poorly the action scenes were edited, and the story was bad. "The 'Rollerball' edit I saw was one of the worst films I'd seen in my life. There was jeering in the theater," Knowles said. Knowles was also one of the people who read the original first draft of the script (the one that McTiernan rejected) and he said that it was an amazing script which solved all the problems of the original film. ] from '']'' was invited by McTiernan for a test screening of the film in Long Island sometime after the first test screening, and in his review of McTiernan's original cut, Knowles said that the movie was bad, but was at least an unapologetic hard-R film with much nudity and some brutal violence in Rollerball scenes, but even as a workprint it was obvious how poorly the action scenes were edited, and the story was bad. "The 'Rollerball' edit I saw was one of the worst films I'd seen in my life. There was jeering in the theater," Knowles said. Knowles was also one of the people who read the original first draft of the script (the one that McTiernan rejected) and he said that it was an amazing script which solved all the problems of the original film.


Following the negative test screenings, MGM ordered massive re-shoots and re-edits to be done on the film in the middle of 2001. Shortly after the test screenings, MGM appointed a new head of marketing and distribution, Robert Levin, who convinced McTiernan to let go of the summer release date. This would give the studio more time to devise a better marketing strategy and allow McTiernan to do re-shoots and to re-edit the film for a PG-13 rating, in an attempt by the studio to get a wider audience to see the film. The release date was then pushed back again from August all the way to February 2002, due to all the post production work causing delays. McTiernan shot two weeks of additional footage in late 2001 to clarify certain scenes, especially the film's ending, and also cut down the violence and all the nudity.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2002/feb/06/entertainment/et-natale6/2 |title=The Way 'Rollerball' Bounces - Page 2 - Los Angeles Times |website=articles.latimes.com |access-date=15 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141013082719/http://articles.latimes.com/2002/feb/06/entertainment/et-natale6/2 |archive-date=13 October 2014 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=June 7, 2001 |author=Harry Knowles |author-link=Harry Knowles |title=ROLLERBALL (2001) test print Review |website=Aint It Cool News |url=http://legacy.aintitcool.com/node/9240 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=February 5, 2002 |title=ROLLERBALL still sucks' |website=Aint It Cool News |url=http://legacy.aintitcool.com/node/11436 }}</ref> Following the negative test screenings, MGM ordered massive re-shoots and re-edits to be done on the film in the middle of 2001. Shortly after the test screenings, MGM appointed a new head of marketing and distribution, Robert Levin, who convinced McTiernan to let go of the summer release date. This would give the studio more time to devise a better marketing strategy and allow McTiernan to do re-shoots and to re-edit the film for a PG-13 rating, in an attempt by the studio to get a wider audience to see the film. The release date was then pushed back again from August all the way to February 2002, due to all the post production work causing delays. McTiernan shot two weeks of additional footage in late 2001 to clarify certain scenes, especially the film's ending, and also cut down the violence and all the nudity.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2002/feb/06/entertainment/et-natale6/2 |title=The Way 'Rollerball' Bounces - Page 2 - Los Angeles Times |website=] |access-date=15 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141013082719/http://articles.latimes.com/2002/feb/06/entertainment/et-natale6/2 |archive-date=13 October 2014 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=June 7, 2001 |author=Harry Knowles |author-link=Harry Knowles |title=ROLLERBALL (2001) test print Review |website=Aint It Cool News |url=http://legacy.aintitcool.com/node/9240 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=February 5, 2002 |title=ROLLERBALL still sucks' |website=Aint It Cool News |url=http://legacy.aintitcool.com/node/11436 }}</ref>


On orders from the studio, around 30 minutes were cut out of the original rough cut of the film and the entire ending was re-shot and changed. Some of the cuts were made because MGM thought the movie was "too Asian".<ref name="latimes">{{cite web |date= February 6, 2002 |title= The Way 'Rollerball' Bounces |url= https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-feb-06-et-natale6-story.html |website= ] }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= ROLLERBALL to be gutted to PG-13 and released Feb. 8th! |url= https://www.aintitcool.com/node/9743 |website= Aint It Cool News }}</ref> On orders from the studio, around 30 minutes were cut out of the original rough cut of the film and the entire ending was re-shot and changed. Some of the cuts were made because MGM thought the movie was "too Asian".<ref name="latimes">{{cite web |date= February 6, 2002 |title= The Way 'Rollerball' Bounces |url= https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-feb-06-et-natale6-story.html |website= ] }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= ROLLERBALL to be gutted to PG-13 and released Feb. 8th! |url= https://www.aintitcool.com/node/9743 |website= Aint It Cool News }}</ref>
Line 102: Line 102:


Some of the action scenes were also longer in the original cut and/or edited differently or re-shot, such as the opening scene in San Francisco which was partially re-shot after the original version of it was considered to be too confusing due to the editing. Some of the action scenes were also longer in the original cut and/or edited differently or re-shot, such as the opening scene in San Francisco which was partially re-shot after the original version of it was considered to be too confusing due to the editing.

The infamous night vision sequence was actually a re-shot version of the scene. After realizing that they shot the original version of the scene to look too dark, filmmakers had to return and re-shoot the entire sequence, delaying the movie's release for six months. Due to the issues with the budget, this scene could not be finished properly, thus it was decided to add green visual tint to the scene to make the scene look like it was shot in night vision, despite the lack of point in giving it that look.{{Citation needed|date=January 2021}}


The original score by ] was also removed, purportedly because it sounded "too Arabic", and was replaced with a new score by ]. Also, some of the other music was changed or removed from the first cut of the film.<ref>{{cite web |title=The John McTiernan's ROLLERBALL page |url= http://www.conancompletist.com/eatersofthedead/interviews/jason.htm |website=www.conancompletist.com}}</ref> The original score by ] was also removed, purportedly because it sounded "too Arabic", and was replaced with a new score by ]. Also, some of the other music was changed or removed from the first cut of the film.<ref>{{cite web |title=The John McTiernan's ROLLERBALL page |url= http://www.conancompletist.com/eatersofthedead/interviews/jason.htm |website=www.conancompletist.com}}</ref>


==Reception== ==Reception==
On ] the film has an approval rating of 3% based on 118 reviews and an average rating of 2.55/10. The site's consensus reads, "Removing the social critique of the original, this updated version of ''Rollerball'' is violent, confusing, and choppy. Klein makes for a bland hero."<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/rollerball_2002 |title= Rollerball (2002) |website= ] |publisher= ] |access-date= February 14, 2023 }}</ref> On ] the film has a score of 14 out of 100 based on reviews from 28 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".<ref>{{cite web |title= Rollerball |url= https://www.metacritic.com/movie/rollerball |website=] |access-date= May 4, 2020 }}</ref> Audiences surveyed by ] gave the film a grade B− on scale of A to F.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |title=ROLLERBALL (2002) B-|work= ] |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181220122629/https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |archive-date= December 20, 2018 }}</ref> On ] the film has an approval rating of 3% based on 119 reviews and an average rating of 2.55/10. The site's consensus reads, "Removing the social critique of the original, this updated version of ''Rollerball'' is violent, confusing, and choppy. Klein makes for a bland hero."<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/rollerball_2002 |title= Rollerball (2002) |website= ] |publisher= ] |access-date= February 14, 2023 }}</ref> On ] the film has a score of 14 out of 100 based on reviews from 28 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".<ref>{{cite web |title= Rollerball |url= https://www.metacritic.com/movie/rollerball |website=] |access-date= May 4, 2020 }}</ref> Audiences surveyed by ] gave the film a grade B− on scale of A to F.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |title=ROLLERBALL (2002) B-|work= ] |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181220122629/https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |archive-date= December 20, 2018 }}</ref>


'']'''s Trevor Johnson described it as "a checklist shaped by a 15-year-old mallrat: thrashing metal track, skateboards, motorbikes, cracked heads and Rebecca Romijn with her top off".{{Citation needed|date=June 2020}} '']'' reviewer ] called it "an incoherent mess, a jumble of footage in search of plot, meaning, rhythm and sense".<ref name="Ebert">{{cite web |last= Ebert |first= Roger |author-link= Roger Ebert |title= Rollerball movie review & film summary (2002) |url= https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/rollerball-2002 |website= ] }}</ref> The film's lead, Chris Klein, was also a subject of criticism and ridicule, being referred to as a bland hero.{{Citation needed|date=June 2020}} '']'''s Trevor Johnson described it as "a checklist shaped by a 15-year-old mallrat: thrashing metal track, skateboards, motorbikes, cracked heads and Rebecca Romijn with her top off".{{Citation needed|date=June 2020}} '']'' reviewer ] called it "an incoherent mess, a jumble of footage in search of plot, meaning, rhythm and sense".<ref name="Ebert">{{cite web |last= Ebert |first= Roger |author-link= Roger Ebert |title= Rollerball movie review & film summary (2002) |url= https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/rollerball-2002 |website= ] }}</ref> Chris Klein, the lead actor, was also a subject of criticism, with Ebert saying Klein seemed like a "nice kid" and was not convincing in what aspired to be a hard-edged violent film.<ref name="Ebert"/>


===Box office=== ===Box office===
Line 123: Line 121:
{{see also|John McTiernan#Criminal charges, felony conviction, and incarceration}} {{see also|John McTiernan#Criminal charges, felony conviction, and incarceration}}


In 2013, director ] was sent to federal prison for making a false statement to an FBI investigator in February 2006 about his hiring the private investigator ] to illegally wiretap ], the producer of the film, around August 2000.<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/die-hard-director-john-mctiernan-412690 |author= Alex Ben Block|title='Die Hard' Director John McTiernan Headed to Prison After Supreme Court Denies Appeal|date=January 15, 2013|access-date=January 15, 2013|work= ] }}</ref><ref name="OneYear">{{cite web |date= October 4, 2010 |last= Johnson |first= Ted |title= Judge sentences McTiernan to year in prison |url= https://www.variety.com/article/VR1118025109 |website= Variety }}</ref> McTiernan (who was released in 2014) had been in a disagreement with Roven about what type of film ''Rollerball'' should be, and had hired Pellicano to investigate Roven's intentions and actions.<ref>{{cite web |date= September 24, 2007 |last1=Shprintz |first1=Janet |last2=McClintock |first2=Pamela |title=John McTiernan sentenced to prison : Die Hard director lied to FBI about Pellicano |url= https://www.variety.com/article/VR1117972627 |website= Variety }}</ref> In 2013, director ] was sent to federal prison for making a false statement to an FBI investigator in February 2006 about his hiring the private investigator ] to illegally wiretap ], the producer of the film, around August 2000.<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/die-hard-director-john-mctiernan-412690 |author= Alex Ben Block|title='Die Hard' Director John McTiernan Headed to Prison After Supreme Court Denies Appeal|date=January 15, 2013|access-date=January 15, 2013|work= ] }}</ref><ref name="OneYear">{{cite web |date= October 4, 2010 |last= Johnson |first= Ted |title= Judge sentences McTiernan to year in prison |url= https://variety.com/2010/biz/news/judge-sentences-mctiernan-to-year-in-prison-1118025109/ |website= Variety }}</ref> McTiernan (who was released in 2014) had been in a disagreement with Roven about what type of film ''Rollerball'' should be, and had hired Pellicano to investigate Roven's intentions and actions.<ref>{{cite web |date= September 24, 2007 |last1=Shprintz |first1=Janet |last2=McClintock |first2=Pamela |title=John McTiernan sentenced to prison : Die Hard director lied to FBI about Pellicano |url= https://variety.com/2007/biz/markets-festivals/john-mctiernan-sentenced-to-prison-1117972627/ |website= Variety }}</ref>


== Soundtrack == == Soundtrack ==
Line 181: Line 179:
] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 20:13, 11 November 2024

2002 film by John McTiernan

Rollerball
Theatrical release poster
Directed byJohn McTiernan
Screenplay by
Based on
Produced by
Starring
CinematographySteve Mason
Edited by
Music byÉric Serra
Production
companies
Distributed by
Release dates
  • February 8, 2002 (2002-02-08) (United States)
  • March 28, 2002 (2002-03-28) (Germany)
  • May 11, 2002 (2002-05-11) (Japan)
Running time98 minutes
Countries
  • Germany
  • Japan
  • United States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$70 million
Box office$25.9 million

Rollerball is a 2002 science fiction sports film directed by John McTiernan. A remake of the 1975 film of the same name, based on William Harrison's short story Roller Ball Murder, the film stars Chris Klein, Jean Reno, LL Cool J, Rebecca Romijn and Naveen Andrews.

While both versions of Rollerball use the same basic premise, the 2002 version has a much greater focus on action sequences, more muted social and political overtones than the original, and takes place in the mid-2000s rather than in a future dystopian society.

Rollerball was released on February 8, 2002. Upon its release, the film was critically panned, receiving criticism for the lack of the original's social critique, and was a box-office bomb, grossing $25.9 million against a production budget of $70 million.

Plot

In 2005, the new sport of Rollerball, a violent extension of roller derby involving motorcycles and a metal ball, becomes popular in many countries. Marcus Ridley invites the talented sports fanatic Jonathan Cross to join him playing for the Zhambel Horsemen in Kazakhstan. Jonathan refuses, hoping to try out for the NHL in some months. However, after he recklessly skates through his hometown, the police start looking for Jonathan, who is forced to accept Marcus's offer to escape them. The highly paid Marcus and Jonathan are teamed with low-paid locals, who are often severely injured in the game.

In the beginning, Jonathan, the team's star player and the poster child of promoter Alexi Petrovich, is enamored by the high-octane sport, the popularity, sports cars, and his female teammate Aurora. The two keep their relationship a secret and refuse to put a stop to rumors that Aurora is a lesbian. During one game, one of their teammates is killed by an opponent, something that is prone to happen in a match. However, the team quickly discovers that that murder might have been planned before the game, as one of the straps of the victim's helmet had been cut and the cameras filming the event seemed ready for the death to happen. Jonathan and Ridley eventually discover that Alexi and his assistant, Sanjay, have a vested interest in keeping the game as popular as possible, through planned gory "accidents" and ensuring that Jonathan and Ridley cannot quit the team and remain high-profile stars. Both the deaths and Jonathan's talent seem to generate upticks in ratings.

Jonathan and Ridley pretend to know nothing about this situation, wanting to keep their current lifestyle, but after an "accident" almost kills Aurora, the two friends decide that they need to flee the country to save their lives. Their teammates, including Aurora, cannot join them, though, as they have families there. Jonathan and Marcus are followed by Alexi and several bodyguards, who attack the two before they can reach the Russian border. Jonathan is injured and Ridley has to leave him behind. Alexi and his men capture Jonathan and kill Ridley before the latter can cross the border.

Jonathan says that he will keep working for Alexi if Aurora is traded to another team, wanting to keep her away from danger. Alexi complies, secretly transferring Aurora to the opposing team for the next match. Knowing he cannot trust Jonathan anymore, Alexi tries to stage a public execution of him by removing all the rules from the upcoming Rollerball match. The match becomes more violent than ever before, and many players die. However, Jonathan, with the help of players from both teams, starts a revolution, causing the fans to see the sport for what it really is. In a fit of rage, he kills Alexi and Sanjay before reuniting with Aurora.

Cast

The film features cameo appearances by Pink, Slipknot, and Shane McMahon.

Production

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Although the first draft of the script was considered by many to be very good and even superior to the original film, director John McTiernan didn't like it because it focused more on social commentary, while he thought that the audience would like to see more of the Rollerball scenes. He had the original script completely re-written several times and made sure that it focused more on WWE-like showmanship, including crazy costumes and stunts, while changing the film's storyline from a modern-day success story to a classic underdog story and changing the name of the main character in the film from Jonathan E. to Jonathan Cross.

The movie was filmed in about 15 weeks, between July 24 and November 2000. McTiernan's first cut, which was over two hours long, was test screened in Las Vegas around April or May 2001, and got a very negative response from test audiences. MGM pushed the release date from May to July 13, 2001 to test the movie again, hoping that they would find the right audience for it.

Harry Knowles from Ain't it Cool News was invited by McTiernan for a test screening of the film in Long Island sometime after the first test screening, and in his review of McTiernan's original cut, Knowles said that the movie was bad, but was at least an unapologetic hard-R film with much nudity and some brutal violence in Rollerball scenes, but even as a workprint it was obvious how poorly the action scenes were edited, and the story was bad. "The 'Rollerball' edit I saw was one of the worst films I'd seen in my life. There was jeering in the theater," Knowles said. Knowles was also one of the people who read the original first draft of the script (the one that McTiernan rejected) and he said that it was an amazing script which solved all the problems of the original film.

Following the negative test screenings, MGM ordered massive re-shoots and re-edits to be done on the film in the middle of 2001. Shortly after the test screenings, MGM appointed a new head of marketing and distribution, Robert Levin, who convinced McTiernan to let go of the summer release date. This would give the studio more time to devise a better marketing strategy and allow McTiernan to do re-shoots and to re-edit the film for a PG-13 rating, in an attempt by the studio to get a wider audience to see the film. The release date was then pushed back again from August all the way to February 2002, due to all the post production work causing delays. McTiernan shot two weeks of additional footage in late 2001 to clarify certain scenes, especially the film's ending, and also cut down the violence and all the nudity.

On orders from the studio, around 30 minutes were cut out of the original rough cut of the film and the entire ending was re-shot and changed. Some of the cuts were made because MGM thought the movie was "too Asian". In the original ending, Petrovich gets killed by Sanjay and Jonathan and Aurora fly back to the US, during which Jonathan says that he will continue playing the Rollerball game in the US, and how he is now part owner of the game.

Some of the scenes that were cut for the PG-13 rating, but were never put back even in later DVD and Blu-ray so called R rated versions of the film, include lots more blood in all the Rollerball scenes and parts like skulls getting smashed, bones getting broken, teeth flying out, a scene where Aurora is topless and walks towards Jonathan in the locker room originally didn't have a shadow over her (this was added in post production to cover her up for the PG-13 rating), their sex scene was also longer, and so was their conversation while they are lying down in a sauna. Some of the other similar edits that were done on more graphic scenes in the film include digitally replacing blood spurts with sweat.

Some of the action scenes were also longer in the original cut and/or edited differently or re-shot, such as the opening scene in San Francisco which was partially re-shot after the original version of it was considered to be too confusing due to the editing.

The original score by Brian Transeau was also removed, purportedly because it sounded "too Arabic", and was replaced with a new score by Éric Serra. Also, some of the other music was changed or removed from the first cut of the film.

Reception

On Rotten Tomatoes the film has an approval rating of 3% based on 119 reviews and an average rating of 2.55/10. The site's consensus reads, "Removing the social critique of the original, this updated version of Rollerball is violent, confusing, and choppy. Klein makes for a bland hero." On Metacritic the film has a score of 14 out of 100 based on reviews from 28 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike". Audiences surveyed by CinemaScore gave the film a grade B− on scale of A to F.

Time Out's Trevor Johnson described it as "a checklist shaped by a 15-year-old mallrat: thrashing metal track, skateboards, motorbikes, cracked heads and Rebecca Romijn with her top off". Chicago Sun-Times reviewer Roger Ebert called it "an incoherent mess, a jumble of footage in search of plot, meaning, rhythm and sense". Chris Klein, the lead actor, was also a subject of criticism, with Ebert saying Klein seemed like a "nice kid" and was not convincing in what aspired to be a hard-edged violent film.

Box office

The film was a box-office flop, earning a worldwide total of $25.9 million compared to a production budget of $70 million. In 2014, the Los Angeles Times listed the film as one of the most expensive box office flops of all time.

Accolades

Rebecca Romijn was nominated for a Golden Raspberry Award as Worst Supporting Actress, where she lost to Madonna for her cameo in Die Another Day. At the 2002 Stinkers Bad Movie Awards, the film won the awards for Worst Director (McTiernan), Worst Remake, and Worst Female Fake Accent (Romijn-Stamos). Romijn-Stamos was also nominated for Worst Actress but lost to Madonna for Swept Away.

The creator of Rollerball, science fiction author William Harrison, said, "I've never watched the 2002 incarnation of Rollerball, and have no interest in it."

Controversy

See also: John McTiernan § Criminal charges, felony conviction, and incarceration

In 2013, director John McTiernan was sent to federal prison for making a false statement to an FBI investigator in February 2006 about his hiring the private investigator Anthony Pellicano to illegally wiretap Charles Roven, the producer of the film, around August 2000. McTiernan (who was released in 2014) had been in a disagreement with Roven about what type of film Rollerball should be, and had hired Pellicano to investigate Roven's intentions and actions.

Soundtrack

The score was released, but the soundtrack was not.

  1. "Boom" – P.O.D.
  2. "Told You So" – Drowning Pool
  3. "Ride" – Beautiful Creatures
  4. "Millionaire" – Rappagariya
  5. "I Am Hated" – Slipknot
  6. "Body Go" – Hardknox
  7. "Feel So Numb" – Rob Zombie
  8. "Keep Away" – Godsmack
  9. "Insane in the Brain" – Sen Dog
  10. "Flashpoint" – Fear Factory
  11. "When I Come Around" – Green Day
  12. "Crawling in the Dark" – Hoobastank
  13. "Time to Play" – Pillar
  14. "Never Gonna Stop (The Red Red Kroovy)" – Rob Zombie

References

  1. ^ "Rollerball (2002)". AFI Catalog of Feature Films. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  2. Meza, Ed (May 8, 2002). "Helkon breaks distrib ties with Buena Vista". Variety. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  3. ^ Harris, Dana (May 4, 2000). "MGM, Atlas pact for pix". Variety. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  4. "ROLLERBALL (15)". British Board of Film Classification. February 14, 2002. Retrieved June 20, 2015.
  5. ^ "Rollerball (2002)". British Film Institute. Archived from the original on December 31, 2018. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  6. ^ "Rollerball". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved August 24, 2011.
  7. "The Way 'Rollerball' Bounces - Page 2 - Los Angeles Times". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on October 13, 2014. Retrieved January 15, 2022.
  8. Harry Knowles (June 7, 2001). "ROLLERBALL (2001) test print Review". Aint It Cool News.
  9. "ROLLERBALL still sucks'". Aint It Cool News. February 5, 2002.
  10. "The Way 'Rollerball' Bounces". Los Angeles Times. February 6, 2002.
  11. "ROLLERBALL to be gutted to PG-13 and released Feb. 8th!". Aint It Cool News.
  12. "The John McTiernan's ROLLERBALL page". www.conancompletist.com.
  13. "Rollerball (2002)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  14. "Rollerball". Metacritic. Retrieved May 4, 2020.
  15. "ROLLERBALL (2002) B-". CinemaScore. Archived from the original on December 20, 2018.
  16. ^ Ebert, Roger. "Rollerball movie review & film summary (2002)". Chicago Sun-Times.
  17. Eller, Claudia, "The costliest box office flops of all time, Los Angeles Times (January 15, 2014)
  18. "Past Winners Database". The Envelope at LA Times. Archived from the original on August 15, 2007. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
  19. Alex Ben Block (January 15, 2013). "'Die Hard' Director John McTiernan Headed to Prison After Supreme Court Denies Appeal". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved January 15, 2013.
  20. Johnson, Ted (October 4, 2010). "Judge sentences McTiernan to year in prison". Variety.
  21. Shprintz, Janet; McClintock, Pamela (September 24, 2007). "John McTiernan sentenced to prison : Die Hard director lied to FBI about Pellicano". Variety.

External links

Films directed by John McTiernan
Films
Related
Categories: