Liturgy of Addai and Mari: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 05:41, 17 April 2007 editMidnite Critic (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users1,963 editsm →Traditionalist Roman Catholic Reaction: copyedit← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:11, 25 April 2007 edit undoCmdrObot (talk \| contribs)339,230 editsm sp: a eucological→an eucologicalNext edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:
	===Traditionalist Roman Catholic Reaction===		===Traditionalist Roman Catholic Reaction===

	Some ] groups have denounced this decision as heretical. {{Fact\|date=February 2007}} They would argue that the consequences of this determination are very weighty in that it completely overthrows the sacramental theology ratified by the Council of Trent. {{Fact\|date=February 2007}} For a sacrament to be valid three elements are necessary: the matter; the form, being in this case the words of institution; and the intention of the priest to do what the Church does. The counter-argument, which apparently lies behind Rome's decision, asserts that "the words of the institution of the Eucharist are in fact present in the anaphora of Addai and Mari, not in the form of a coherent narration and in a literal way but in a eucological and disseminated manner, that is to say they are integrated in the prayers of thanksgiving, praise and intercession which follow". {{Fact\|date=February 2007}} This argument, however, is not accepted by traditionalist Roman Catholics.		Some ] groups have denounced this decision as heretical. {{Fact\|date=February 2007}} They would argue that the consequences of this determination are very weighty in that it completely overthrows the sacramental theology ratified by the Council of Trent. {{Fact\|date=February 2007}} For a sacrament to be valid three elements are necessary: the matter; the form, being in this case the words of institution; and the intention of the priest to do what the Church does. The counter-argument, which apparently lies behind Rome's decision, asserts that "the words of the institution of the Eucharist are in fact present in the anaphora of Addai and Mari, not in the form of a coherent narration and in a literal way but in an eucological and disseminated manner, that is to say they are integrated in the prayers of thanksgiving, praise and intercession which follow". {{Fact\|date=February 2007}} This argument, however, is not accepted by traditionalist Roman Catholics.

	==External links==		==External links==

Revision as of 01:11, 25 April 2007

Eastern Christianity
Part of a series on

Mainstream communions Eastern Orthodoxy Oriental Orthodoxy (Coptic, Orthodox Tewahedo - Ethiopian and Eritrean -, Armenian, Cilicia, Syriac, Indian) Eastern Catholicism Church of the East (Assyrian and Ancient)
Independent communions Old Believers Spiritual Russian
Eastern Protestantism Armenian Evangelical Church Assyrian Evangelical Church Assyrian Pentecostal Church Believers Eastern Church of India Eastern Rite Community in Germany and the Czech Republic Evangelical Baptist Church of Georgia Evangelical Church of Egypt (Synod of the Nile) Evangelical Church of Romania Evangelical Church of the Augsburg Confession in Slovenia Evangelical Orthodox Church Kosovo Protestant Evangelical Church Mar Thoma Syrian Church P'ent'ay - Ethiopian and Eritrean Evangelical Churches Russian Evangelical Church Society for Eastern Rite Anglicanism St. Thomas Evangelical Church of India St. Valentine's Fellowship Ukrainian Lutheran Church
Eastern liturgical rites Alexandrian Coptic Ge'ez Antiochene West Syriac Malankara Armenian Byzantine East Syriac Malabar Eastern Catholic liturgy
Major controversies Arianism Nestorianism Monophysitism Miaphysitism Dyophysitism Henotikon Caesaropapism Three Chapters Monoenergism Monothelitism Dyoenergism Dyothelitism Iconoclasm Filioque Paulicianism Bogomilism Hesychasm Eastern Protestantism
Traditions Greek Melkite Syriac
Groups Antiochian Greek Arab Assyrian Copts Maronites
Other topics Christian mysticism Christology Divine Liturgy Eastern Christian history Monasticism Index of related articles Western Christianity
Christianity portal
v t e

The Holy Qurbana of Addai and Mari belongs to the East Syrian liturgical family and is in regular use in the Church of the East and the Chaldean Church. Saint Addai (disciple of Saint Thomas the Apostle) and Saint Mari (a disciple of Saint Addai) are credited with having written it. The Holy Qurbana of Addai and Mari is one of the oldest Eucharistic prayers in the Catholic Church.

The Eucharistic Liturgy has three forms: the most solemn form known as the Raza, the solemn and the simple form.

One of the special features of the Eucharist Prayer is the presence of four long prayers known as the Gehantha, which are, according to many Eucharistic scholars, the closest forms of prayer to the Jewish Prayers over the meals.

Current Roman Catholic Position

In its pure form, the anaphora does not include the Words of Institution. This has raised ecumenical concerns, since the Roman Catholic Church has traditionally considered the Words of Institution to be essential to the validity of the sacred mystery. Nevertheless, the Roman Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith concluded on January 17, 2001 that the Anaphora of Addai and Mari can be considered valid. Three reasons were given for this. First, the Anaphora of Addai and Mari dates back to the early Church. Secondly, the Church of the East otherwise has preserved the orthodox faith in regard to the Eucharist and Holy Orders. And finally, though the Words of Institution do not appear in a coherent way, they are present in a dispersed way through prayers of praise, thanksgiving and intercession. What this last point would seem to mean is that the Divine Liturgy of Addai and Mari is a reenactment of Christ's Mystical Supper, even without the Words of Institution.

Though this decision by the Roman Catholic Church is not irreformable, its ecumenical importance should not be underestimated. Because of this decision, it is thought by some that there are some circumstances in which the Church can accept an Epiclesis in place of the Words of Institution. Others maintain, however, that this decision affirms that the Words of Institution are present in an implicit way, still regarding the Words of Institution as the essential form of the Sacrament.

Chaldean Catholics, who use this rite, traditionally have inserted the Words of Institution into the anaphora; they are now beginning to cease adding the interpolation.

Traditionalist Roman Catholic Reaction

Some Traditionalist Catholic groups have denounced this decision as heretical. They would argue that the consequences of this determination are very weighty in that it completely overthrows the sacramental theology ratified by the Council of Trent. For a sacrament to be valid three elements are necessary: the matter; the form, being in this case the words of institution; and the intention of the priest to do what the Church does. The counter-argument, which apparently lies behind Rome's decision, asserts that "the words of the institution of the Eucharist are in fact present in the anaphora of Addai and Mari, not in the form of a coherent narration and in a literal way but in an eucological and disseminated manner, that is to say they are integrated in the prayers of thanksgiving, praise and intercession which follow". This argument, however, is not accepted by traditionalist Roman Catholics.

External links

Categories: