Misplaced Pages

Prehistoric Europe: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:53, 8 May 2005 editSimonP (talk | contribs)Administrators113,127 editsm {{History of Europe}}← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:00, 12 November 2024 edit undo2a0a:ef40:3d3:3901:a122:910b:ad40:41c3 (talk) Added link to the Thaïs Bone.Tag: Visual edit 
(841 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|none}} <!-- "none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see ] -->
== Paleolithic ==
{{Infobox
|name = Prehistoric Europe
|bodystyle = off the books
|titlestyle = background:#bee5fe;
|abovestyle = background:#fcfebe; border:1px solid #5599FF;
|headerstyle = background:#ddf;
|labelstyle = background:#ddf;
|datastyle =
|title = '''Prehistoric Europe'''
|above =
|imagestyle =
|captionstyle =
|image =
|caption =
|map_type = Europe 2
|relief = yes
|header1 = '''Early Prehistory'''
|label1 =
|data1 =
|header2 =
|label2 = ]
|data2 = ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/june-2013/article/oldest-human-fossil-in-western-europe-found-in-spain |title=Oldest Human Fossil in Western Europe Found in Spain |newspaper=Popular-archaeology |access-date= December 28, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Carbonell |first1=Eudald |display-authors=etal |title=The first hominin of Europe |journal=Nature |date=27 March 2008 |volume=452 |issue=7186 |pages=465–469 |doi=10.1038/nature06815|pmid=18368116 |bibcode=2008Natur.452..465C |hdl=2027.42/62855 |s2cid=4401629 |url=https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/62855/1/nature06815.pdf }}</ref><br>]
|header3 =
|label3 =]
|data3 = ]
|header4 =
|label4 =]
|data4 = ], ] population of all regions
|header5 =
|label5 = ]
|data5 = Hunter-gatherers
|header6 =
|label6 = ]
|data6 = Agriculture,<br> herding, pottery
|header7 = '''Late Prehistory'''
|label7 =
|data7 =
|header8 =
|label8 = ]
|data8 = ], ], ]
|header9 =
|label9 = ]
|data9 = ], ], ], ], ], ]
|header10 =
|label10 = ]
|data10 = ], ], ], <br>], ], ]
|belowstyle = background:#fcfebe;
|below = {{portal-inline|Europe|size=tiny}}
}}


], ], around 3150 BC]]
'''Upper ]:'''
Europe was populated by species of '']'' since c. 900,000 years ago ('']''), associated with the '']'' technology and later to the ] one (since c. 300,000 BP).


'''Prehistoric Europe''' refers to ] before the start of written records,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/prehistory |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160925201126/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/prehistory |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 25, 2016 |title=Prehistory – definition of prehistory in English |publisher=oxford dictionaries |access-date= December 28, 2016}}</ref> beginning in the ]. As history progresses, considerable regional unevenness in cultural development emerges and grows. The region of the eastern Mediterranean is, due to its geographic proximity, greatly influenced and inspired by the classical Middle Eastern civilizations, and adopts and develops the earliest systems of communal organization and writing.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ancientscripts.com/lineara.html |title=Ancient Scripts: Linear A |newspaper=Ancientscripts.com |access-date= December 29, 2016}}</ref> The ] of Herodotus (from around 440 BC) is the oldest known European text that seeks to systematically record traditions, public affairs and notable events.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/herodotus |title=Herodotus – Ancient History |publisher=History com |access-date= December 29, 2016}}</ref>
'''Middle Paleolithic:'''
Eventually these European ''Homo erectus'' evolved into another species: '']'' (since c. 200,000 BP), associated with the ] technologies. It must be noted that our ancestors '']'' also participated in this tool-making technique for a long time and they may have first settled Europe while this Mid-Paleolithic technique was still in use, though the issue is still unclear.


==Overview==
'''Upper Paleolithic:'''
{{See also|History of Europe}}
Widely dispersed, isolated finds of individual fossils of bone fragments (Atapuerca, Mauer mandible), stone artifacts or ] suggest that during the ], spanning from 3&nbsp;million until 300,000 years ago, palaeo-human presence was rare and typically separated by thousands of years. The ]ic region of the ] in Spain represents the currently earliest known and reliably dated location of residence for more than a single generation and a group of individuals.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/989%20Archeological%20Site%20of%20Atapuerca |title=Archaeological Site of Atapuerca |publisher= UNESCO World Heritage Centre |access-date= December 28, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E05E2D9113BF933A1575AC0A9619C8B63&scp=1&sq=dmanisi%201.8%20million&st=cse | work=The New York Times | title=Fossils Reveal Clues on Human Ancestor | date=20 September 2007}}</ref>


'']'' emerged in ] between 600,000 and 350,000 years ago as the earliest body of European people that left behind a substantial tradition, a set of evaluable historic data through a rich fossil record in Europe's limestone caves and a patchwork of occupation sites over large areas. These include ] cultural ].<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1006/jasc.2002.0834 |title=The Sima de los Huesos Hominids Date to Beyond U/Th Equilibrium (>350kyr) and Perhaps to 400–500kyr: New Radiometric Dates |year=2003 |last1=Bischoff |first1=James L. |last2=Shamp |first2=Donald D. |last3=Aramburu |first3=Arantza |last4=Arsuaga |first4=Juan Luis |last5=Carbonell |first5=Eudald |last6=Bermudez de Castro |first6=J.M. |journal=Journal of Archaeological Science |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=275–80|bibcode=2003JArSc..30..275B }}</ref><ref name=Neanderthal>{{cite encyclopedia|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Neanderthal |title=Neanderthal Anthropology|quote=...Neanderthals inhabited Eurasia from the Atlantic regions… |encyclopedia= Encyclopædia Britannica |date=January 29, 2015 |access-date=September 26, 2016}}</ref> ] arrived in Mediterranean Europe during the ] between 45,000 and 43,000 years ago, and both species occupied a common habitat for several thousand years. Research has so far produced no universally accepted conclusive explanation as to what caused the Neanderthal's extinction between 40,000 and 28,000 years ago.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/13/science/14neanderthal.html?ex=1315800000&en=ca90a9bfe57071f2&ei=5089&_r=0 |title=Neanderthals' Last Stand Is Traced |newspaper= The New York Times |date=September 13, 2006 |access-date=September 26, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/science/fossil-teeth-put-humans-in-europe-earlier-than-thought.html?scp=1&sq=kents%20cavern&st=cse | work=The New York Times | title=Fossil Teeth Put Humans in Europe Earlier Than Thought | date=2 November 2011}}</ref>
'''· Ancient Upper Paleolithic:'''
What is totally clear is that the bearers of most or all Upper Paleolithic technologies were ''H. sapiens''. Some locally developed transitional cultures (] in Central Europe and ] in the Southwest) use clearly Upper Paleolithic technologies at very early dates and there are doubts abour who were their carriers: ''H. sapiens'' or Neanderthal man.


Homo sapiens later populated the entire continent during the ], and advanced north, following the retreating ice sheets of the ] that spanned between 26,500 and 19,000 years ago. A 2015 publication on ancient European DNA collected from Spain to Russia concluded that the original hunter-gatherer population had assimilated a wave of "farmers" who had arrived from the ] during the ] about 8,000 years ago.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/science/dna-deciphers-roots-of-modern-europeans.html?_r=1 |title=DNA Deciphers Roots of Modern Europeans |newspaper=The New York Times |date= June 10, 2015 |access-date= December 28, 2016}}</ref>
Nevertheless, the definitive advance of these technologies is made by the ] culture. The origins of this culture can be located in Bulgaria (proto-Aurignacian) and Hungary (first full Aurignacian). It's thought that peoples originating from the Near East were the carriers of the basics that gave birth to this culture. In any case by 35,000 BCE, the Aurignacian culture and its technology had extended through most of Europe. The last Neanderthals seem to have been forced to retreat during this process to the southern half of the ].


The Mesolithic era site ] in modern-day ], the earliest documented ] community of Europe with permanent buildings, as well as monumental art, precedes by many centuries sites previously considered to be the oldest known. The community's year-round access to a food surplus prior to the introduction of agriculture was the basis for the sedentary lifestyle.<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://www.academia.edu/1558753 |title=Lepenski Vir – Schela Cladovei culture's chronology and its interpretation |journal=Brukenthal. Acta Musei |access-date= December 29, 2016|last1=Rusu |first1=Aurelian I. |date=January 2011 }}</ref> However, the earliest record for the adoption of elements of farming can be found in ], a community with close cultural ties.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.duncancaldwell.com/Site/Prehistory_Shows.html |title=Archaeological Exhibitions |publisher=Duncancaldwell |access-date= December 29, 2016}}</ref>
The first but scarce works of art appear during this phase.


Belovode and ], also in Serbia, is currently the oldest reliably dated copper smelting site in Europe (around 7,000 years ago). It is attributed to the ], which on the contrary provides no links to the initiation of or a transition to the ] or ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/calendar/articles/20100924 |title=Serbian site may have hosted first copper makers |publisher=UCL Institute of Archaeology |access-date= December 29, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://cof.quantumfuturegroup.org/events/5439 |title=Early metallurgy: copper smelting, Belovode, Serbia: Vinča culture |newspaper=quantumfuturegroup.org |access-date= December 29, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.penn.museum/documents/publications/expedition/PDFs/21-1/Jovanovic.pdf |title=The oldest Copper Metallurgy in the Balkans |publisher=Penn Museum |access-date= December 29, 2016}}</ref>
'''· Middle Upper Paleolithic:'''
Around 22,000 BCE two new technologies/cultures appear in the southwestern region of Europe: ] and ]. They might be linked with the transitional cultures mentioned before, because their techniques have some similarities and are both very different from Aurignacian ones but this issue is thus far very obscure.


The process of smelting bronze is an imported technology with debated origins and history of geographic cultural profusion. It was established in Europe about 3200 BC in the Aegean and production was centered around Cyprus, the primary source of copper for the Mediterranean for many centuries.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/plaintexthistories.asp?historyid=ab16 |title=HISTORY OF METALLURGY |publisher=HistoryWorld.net |access-date= December 29, 2016}}</ref>
Though both cultures seem to appear in the SW, the Gravetian soon disappears there, with the notable exception of the Mediterranean coasts of Iberia. Nevertheless, it finds its way to other regions of Europe (Italy, Central and Eastern Europe), reaching even the Caucasus and the Zagros mountains.


The introduction of metallurgy, which initiated unprecedented technological progress, has also been linked with the establishment of social stratification, the distinction between rich and poor, and use of precious metals as the means to fundamentally control the dynamics of culture and society.<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://www.academia.edu/3231693 |title=The Development of Social Stratification in Bronze Age Europe (and Comments and Reply) |journal=Current Anthropology |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=1–23 |publisher=Academia.edu |access-date= December 29, 2016|last1=Gilman |first1=Antonio |last2=Cazzella |first2=Alberto |last3=Cowgill |first3=George L. |last4=Crumley |first4=Carole L. |last5=Earle |first5=Timothy |last6=Gallay |first6=Alain |last7=Harding |first7=A. F. |last8=Harrison |first8=R. J. |last9=Hicks |first9=Ronald |last10=Kohl |first10=Philip L. |last11=Lewthwaite |first11=James |last12=Schwartz |first12=Charles A. |last13=Shennan |first13=Stephen J. |last14=Sherratt |first14=Andrew |last15=Tosi |first15=Maurizio |last16=Wells |first16=Peter S. |doi=10.1086/202600 |year=1981 |s2cid=145631324 }}</ref>
The Solutrean culture, extended from northern Spain to SE France, includes not only a beautiful stone technology but also the first significant development of cave painting, the use of the needle and possibly that of the bow and arrow.


The ] culture also originates in the East through the absorption of the technological principles obtained from the ] about 1200 BC, finally arriving in Northern Europe by 500 BC.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://study.com/academy/lesson/the-hittites-civilization-history-definition.html |title=The Hittites: Civilization, History & Definition |format= Video & Lesson Transcript |newspaper=Study.com |access-date= December 29, 2016}}</ref>
The more widespread Gravetian culture is no less advanced, at least in artistic terms: sculpture (mainly ''venuses'') is the most outstanding form of creative expression of these peoples.


During the Iron Age, Central, Western and most of Eastern Europe gradually entered the actual historical period. Greek maritime colonization and Roman terrestrial conquest form the basis for the diffusion of literacy in large areas to this day. This tradition continued in an altered form and context for the most remote regions (] and ], 13th century) via the universal body of Christian texts, including the incorporation of ] and Russia into the Orthodox cultural sphere. ] and ] languages continued to be the primary and best way to communicate and express ideas in ] and the sciences all over Europe until the early modern period.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Slomp |first1=Hans |title=Europe, A Political Profile: An American companion to European politics |page=50 |date=2011 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-0313391811 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V1uzkNq8xfIC&q=Latin+and+ancient+Greek+influence+europe&pg=PA50}}</ref>
'''· Late Upper Paleolithic:'''
Around 17,000 BCE, Europe witnesses the appearance of a new culture, known as ], possibly rooted in the old Aurignacian one. This culture soon supersedes the Solutrean area and also the Gravetian of Central Europe. However, in Mediterranean Iberia, Italy and Eastern Europe, ] cultures continue evolving locally.


==Stone Age==
With the Magdalenian culture, Paleolithic development in Europe reaches its peak and this is reflected in the amazing art, owing to the previous traditions: basically paintings in the West and sculpture in Central Europe.
===Paleolithic (Old Stone Age)===
{{Further|Paleolithic Europe}}


====Oldest fossils, artifacts and sites====
(Links to Paleolithic santuaries:
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; margin: auto; width:96%"
·
|-
· )
! scope="row" style="width: 16%; font-size:100%; background:#fcfebe; color:#000000;"|Name !! scope="row" style="width: 16%; font-size:100%; background:#fcfebe; color:#000000;"|Abstract !! scope="row" style="width: 16%; font-size:100%; background:#fcfebe; color:#000000;"| Age !! scope="row" style="width: 16%; font-size:100%; background:#fcfebe; color:#000000;"|Location !! scope="row" style="width: 16%; font-size:100%; background:#fcfebe; color:#000000;"|Information !! scope="row" style="width: 16%; font-size:100%; background:#fcfebe; color:#000000;"|Coordinates
|-
| ] || '']'' || 1.77 Mio || ] || "early Homo adult with small brains but large body mass" ||{{coord|41|19|N|44|12|E|display=inline|type:landmark}}
|-
| ]<ref>{{cite web |url=https://anthropology.net/2009/12/16/lithic-assemblage-dated-to-1-57-million-years-found-at-lezignan-la-cebe-southern-france/ |title=Lithic Assemblage Dated to 1.57 Million Years Found at Lézignan-la-Cébe, Southern France |newspaper=Anthropology.net |date= 2009-12-17|access-date= December 30, 2016}}</ref> || ] ] || 1.57 Mio ||Lézignan-la-Cébe || a 30 pebble culture, lithic tools, argon dated || {{coord|43|29|N|3|26|E|display=inline|type:landmark}}
|-
| ] || ] cave || 1.5 Mio || ] || Human molar tooth (considered to be the earliest human—]/]—traces discovered in Europe outside Caucasian region), lower palaeolithic assemblages that belong to a ] non-] industry, and incised bones that may be the earliest example of human ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://vdcci.bg/kiosk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=54:kozarnika-cave&catid=14:nature&Itemid=127&lang=en |title="Kozarnika" cave |publisher=VDCCI BG |access-date=September 5, 2016 |archive-date=September 15, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160915170614/http://vdcci.bg/kiosk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=54:kozarnika-cave&catid=14:nature&Itemid=127&lang=en |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3512470.stm |title=Early human marks are "symbols" |work=BBC News |date=March 16, 2004 |access-date=September 5, 2016}}</ref> ||{{coord|43|39|N|22|42|E|display=inline|type:landmark}}
|-
| ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/a_orce.html |title=Creationist Arguments: Orce Man |newspaper=Talkorigins |access-date= December 31, 2016}}</ref> || tooth and tools || 1.4 Mio || Venta Micena ||most finds are stone tools ||{{coord|37|43|N|2|28|W|display=inline|type:landmark}}
|-
| ]<ref>{{cite journal |title=Early Pleistocene human mandible from Sima del Elefante (TE) cave site in Sierra de Atapuerca (Spain): a comparative morphological study |journal=Journal of Human Evolution |pmid=21531443 | doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.03.005 |volume=61 |issue=1 |pages=12–25 | last1 = Bermúdez | last2 = de Castro | first2 = JM | last3 = Martinón-Torres | first3 = M | last4 = Gómez-Robles | first4 = A | last5 = Prado-Simón | first5 = L | last6 = Martín-Francés | first6 = L | last7 = Lapresa | first7 = M | last8 = Olejniczak | first8 = A | last9 = Carbonell | first9 = E|year=2011 }}</ref> || '']''||1.3 Mio || ] || ||{{coord|42|22|N|3|30|W|display=inline|type:landmark}}
|-
| ] || '']'' ||600,000 || Mauer|| earliest '']'' ||{{coord|49|20|N|8|47|E|display=inline|type:landmark}}
|-
| ] || '']'' || 500,000|| ]|| ||{{coord|50|51|N|0|42|W|display=inline|type:landmark}}
|-
| ] || '']'' || 450,000 ||]|| ''proposed subspecies'' ||{{coord|42|48|N|2|45|E|display=inline|type:landmark}}
|-
| ] ||'']'' ||400,000 || ]|| ''north-western habitat maximum'' ||{{coord|51|26|N|0|17|E|display=inline|type:landmark}}
|-
| ]<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://archive.archaeology.org/9705/newsbriefs/spears.html |title=World's Oldest Spears |journal=Archaeology |volume=50 |issue=3 |date=May–June 1997 |author=Arlette P. Kouwenhoven |access-date= December 30, 2016 }}</ref> || wooden javelins || 380,000 ||Schoningen 1995|| ''active hunt'' ||{{coord|42|48|N|2|45|E|display=inline|type:landmark}}
|}


''']:''' ====Lower and Middle Paleolithic human presence====
]
Around 10,500 BCE, the ] Glacial age ends. Slowly, through the following millennia, temperatures and sea levels rise, changing the environment of prehistoric people. Nevertheless, Magdalenian culture persists until circa 8000 BCE, when it quickly evolves into two ''microlithist'' cultures: ], in Spain and southern France, and ], in northern France and Central Europe. Though there are some differences, both cultures share several traits: the creation of very small stone tools called ]s and the scarcity of figurative art, which seems to have vanished almost completely, being replaced by abstract decoration of tools.
The climatic record of the Paleolithic is characterised by the ] pattern of cyclic warmer and colder periods, including eight major cycles and numerous shorter episodes. The northern maximum of human occupation fluctuated in response to the changing conditions, and successful settlement required constant adaption capabilities and problem solving. Most of Scandinavia, the ] and Russia remained off limits for occupation during the Paleolithic and Mesolithic.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-Europe/Paleolithic-settlement |title=Paleolithic settlement |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date= December 31, 2016}}</ref> Populations were low in density and small in number throughout the Palaeolithic.<ref>{{Cite book |last=French |first=Jennifer |title=Palaeolithic Europe: A Demographic and Social Prehistory |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2021 |url=https://www.cambridge.org/gb/universitypress/subjects/archaeology/prehistory/palaeolithic-europe-demographic-and-social-prehistory?format=PB |isbn=9781108710060 |location=UK |pages=1–18}}</ref>


Associated evidence, such as stone tools, artifacts and settlement localities, is more numerous than fossilised remains of the hominin occupants themselves. The simplest pebble tools with a few flakes struck off to create an edge were found in ], Georgia, and in Spain at sites in the ] basin and near ]. The ] tool discoveries, called ''Mode 1-type assemblages'' are gradually replaced by a more complex tradition that included a range of hand axes and flake tools, the ], ''Mode 2-type assemblages''. Both types of tool sets are attributed to '']'', the earliest and for a very long time the only human in Europe and more likely to be found in the southern part of the continent. However, the Acheulean fossil record also links to the emergence of '']'', particularly its specific ] tools and handaxes. The presence of ''Homo heidelbergensis'' is documented since 600,000 BC in numerous sites in Germany, Great Britain and northern France.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=Early Evidence of Acheulean Settlement in Northwestern Europe – La Noira Site, a 700,000 Year-Old Occupation in the Center of France |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=8 |issue=11 |pages=e75529 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0075529 |pmid=24278105 |year=2013 |last1=Moncel |first1=Marie-Hélène |last2=Despriée |first2=Jackie |last3=Voinchet |first3=Pierre |last4=Tissoux |first4=Hélène |last5=Moreno |first5=Davinia |last6=Bahain |first6=Jean-Jacques |last7=Courcimault |first7=Gilles |last8=Falguères |first8=Christophe |bibcode=2013PLoSO...875529M |pmc=3835824|doi-access=free }}</ref>
In the late phase of this epi-Paleolithic period, the Sauveterrean culture evolves into the so-called ] and influences strongly its southern neighbour, clearly replacing it in Mediterranean Spain and Portugal.


Although ] generally agree that ''Homo erectus'' and ''Homo heidelbergensis'' immigrated to Europe, debates remain about migration routes and the chronology.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo/homo_2.htm |title=Early Human Evolution: Homo ergaster and erectus |publisher=palomar edu |access-date= December 31, 2016}}</ref>
The recession of the glaciers allows human colonization in Northern Europe for the first time. The ] culture, derived from the Sauveterre-Tardenois culture but with a strong personality, colonizes Denmark and the nearby regions, including parts of Britain.


The fact that '']'' is found only in a contiguous range in ] and the general acceptance of the ] hypothesis both suggest that the species has evolved locally. Again, consensus prevails on the matter, but widely debated are origin and evolution patterns.<ref>{{cite news |first=Clive |last=Cookson|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/c8260378-fc36-11e3-98b8-00144feab7de.html |title= Palaeontology: How Neanderthals evolved | newspaper= Financial Times |date=June 27, 2014 |access-date=October 28, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Callaway|first1=Ewen|title='Pit of bones' catches Neanderthal evolution in the act|journal=Nature News|date=19 June 2014|doi=10.1038/nature.2014.15430|s2cid=88427585}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/oldest-ancient-human-dna-details-dawn-of-neandertals/ |title= Oldest Ancient-Human DNA Details Dawn of Neandertals | magazine= Scientific American |date=March 14, 2016 |access-date=September 26, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/species/homo-heidelbergensis |title= ''Homo heidelbergensis'' |quote= Comparison of Neanderthal and modern human DNA suggests that the two lineages diverged from a common ancestor, most likely ''Homo heidelbergensis'' | publisher= Smithsonian Institution |date= 2010-02-14|access-date=September 26, 2016}}</ref>
== Neolithic ==
The Neanderthal fossil record ranges from Western Europe to the ] in Central Asia and the ] in the North to the ] in the South. Unlike its predecessors, they were biologically and culturally adapted to survival in cold environments and successfully extended their range to the glacial environments of Central Europe and the Russian plains. The great number and, in some cases, exceptional state of preservation of Neanderthal fossils and cultural ] enables researchers to provide a detailed and accurate data on behaviour and culture.<ref name="smithsonian">{{Cite news|url = http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/the-skeletons-of-shanidar-cave-7028477/?no-ist=&page=1|title = The Skeletons of Shanidar Cave|last = Edwards|first = Owen|date = March 2010|work = Smithsonian|access-date = 17 October 2014}}</ref><ref name=Neanderthal/> Neanderthals are associated with the ] (''Mode 3''), stone tools that first appeared approximately 160,000 years ago.<ref>{{cite book |editor1-last=Shaw |editor1-first=Ian |editor2-last=Jameson |editor2-first=Robert |title=A Dictionary of Archaeology |date=1999 |publisher= Blackwell |isbn=978-0-631-17423-3 |page=408 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8HKDtlPuM2oC&q=mousterian+40%2C000&pg=PA408|access-date=1 August 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/species/homo-neanderthalensis |title=Homo neanderthalensis |quote=...The Mousterian stone tool industry of Neanderthals is characterized by… |publisher= Smithsonian Institution |date=September 22, 2016 |access-date=September 26, 2016}}</ref>


===Upper Paleolithic===
European ] comes from the ], via ], the ] waterway and also through the ] in what regards to the East. There has been a long discussion between ''migrationists'' (who claim that the Asian peasants almost totally displaced the European native hunter-gatherers) and diffusionists (who claim that the process was slow enough to have occurred mostly through cultural transmission). Modern genetic studies seem to show that the truth is somewhere in the middle and that both processes took place, although the question is still open.
{{main|European early modern humans|Paleolithic Europe}}
''Homo sapiens'' arrived in Europe around 46,000 and 43,000 years ago via the ] and entered the continent through the ], as the fossils at the sites of ] and ] suggest.<ref name=Wilford>{{cite news |first=John Noble |last=Wilford |title=Fossil Teeth Put Humans in Europe Earlier Than Thought |newspaper=New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/science/fossil-teeth-put-humans-in-europe-earlier-than-thought.html |date=2 Nov 2011 |access-date=2012-04-19 }}</ref> With an approximate age of 46,000 years,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fewlass |first1=Helen |last2=Talamo |first2=Sahra |last3=Wacker |first3=Lukas |last4=Kromer |first4=Bernd |last5=Tuna |first5=Thibaut |last6=Fagault |first6=Yoann |last7=Bard |first7=Edouard |last8=McPherron |first8=Shannon P. |last9=Aldeias |first9=Vera |last10=Maria |first10=Raquel |last11=Martisius |first11=Naomi L. |last12=Paskulin |first12=Lindsay |last13=Rezek |first13=Zeljko |last14=Sinet-Mathiot |first14=Virginie |last15=Sirakova |first15=Svoboda |last16=Smith |first16=Geoffrey M. |last17=Spasov |first17=Rosen |last18=Welker |first18=Frido |last19=Sirakov |first19=Nikolay |last20=Tsanova |first20=Tsenka |last21=Hublin |first21=Jean-Jacques |title=A 14C chronology for the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition at Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria |journal=Nature Ecology & Evolution |date=11 May 2020 |volume=4 |issue=6 |pages=794–801 |doi=10.1038/s41559-020-1136-3 |pmid = 32393865 |hdl=11585/770560 |s2cid=218593433 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> the '']'' fossils found in Bacho Kiro cave consist of a pair of fragmented ] including at least one ]<ref>{{cite book|title=After Eden: The evolution of human domination |last=Sale |first=Kirkpatrick |publisher=Duke University Press |year=2006 |page= |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780822339380 |url-access=registration |access-date=11 November 2011|isbn=0822339382 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kuhn |first1=Steven L. |last2=Stiner |first2=Mary C. |last3=Reese |first3=David S. |last4=Güleç |first4=Erksin |title=Ornaments of the earliest Upper Paleolithic: New insights from the Levant |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |date=19 June 2001 |volume=98 |issue=13 |pages=7641–7646 |doi=10.1073/pnas.121590798 |pmid=11390976 |pmc=34721 |bibcode=2001PNAS...98.7641K |doi-access=free }}</ref> This site yielded the oldest known ornaments in Europe, ] to over 43,000 years ago.<ref>{{cite book|title=European Prehistory: A Survey|last=Milisauskas|first=Sarunas|publisher=Springer|year=1974|isbn=978-1-4419-6633-9|access-date=June 8, 2012|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gcGSn0eVs2oC&q=bulgaria&pg=PA234|quote=One of the earliest dates for an Aurignacian assemblage is greater than 43,000 BP from Bacho Kiro cave in Bulgaria&nbsp;...}}</ref>


The fossils' genetic structure indicates a recent Neanderthal ancestry and the discovery of a fragment of a skull in Israel in 2008 support the notion that humans interbred with Neanderthals in the Levant.{{citation needed|date=April 2020}}
'''· First Neolithic Culture in Thessalia:'''
Apparently related with the Anatolian culture of ], the Greek region of ] is the first place of Europe known to have developed agriculture, cattle-herding and pottery. These early stages are know as ] culture.


After the slow processes of the previous hundreds of thousands of years, a turbulent period of Neanderthal–''Homo sapiens'' coexistence demonstrated that cultural evolution had replaced biological evolution as the primary force of adaptation and change in human societies.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www2.fiu.edu/~grenierg/chapter5.htm |title=Chapter 5: Hunting & Gathering Societies |publisher=Florida International University |access-date= December 31, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.u.arizona.edu/~mstiner/pdf/Kuhn_Stiner1998b.pdf |title=Creativity in human evolution and prehistory |publisher=Arizona University |access-date= December 31, 2016}}</ref>
'''· Ancient Neolithic:'''
The Thessalian neolithic culture soon evolves in the more coherent culture of ] (c. 6000 BCE), which is the origin of the main branches of Neolithic expansion in Europe. Practically all the BalkansPeninsula is colonized in the 6th millennium from there. That expansion, reaching the easternmost Tardenoisian outposts of the upper ] gives birth to the ] culture, a significant modification of the Balkan Neolithic that will be in the origin of one of the most important branches of European neolithic: the '''Danubian''' group of cultures.


Generally small and widely dispersed fossil sites suggest that Neanderthals lived in less numerous and more socially isolated groups than ''Homo sapiens''. Tools and ] are remarkably sophisticated from the outset, but they have a slow rate of variability, and general technological inertia is noticeable during the entire fossil period. Artifacts are of utilitarian nature, and symbolic behavioral traits are undocumented before the arrival of modern humans. The ] culture, introduced by modern humans, is characterized by cut ] or ] points, fine flint ] and bladelets struck from prepared ], rather than using crude ]. The oldest examples and subsequent widespread tradition of prehistoric art originate from the ].<ref name="MellarsArcheology">{{cite journal | last1 = Mellars | first1 = P. | year = 2006 | title = Archeology and the Dispersal of Modern Humans in Europe: Deconstructing the Aurignacian | journal = Evolutionary Anthropology | volume = 15 | issue = 5| pages = 167–182 | doi=10.1002/evan.20103| s2cid = 85316570 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://eol.org/pages/4454114/details |title=Homo neanderthalensis Brief Summary |publisher=EOL |access-date=September 26, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | title =Symbolic or utilitarian? Juggling interpretations of Neanderthal behavior: new inferences from the study of engraved stone surfaces | pmid=25020018 | doi=10.4436/JASS.92007 | volume=92 | issue=92 | journal=J Anthropol Sci | pages=233–55 | last1 = Peresani | first1 = M | last2 = Dallatorre | first2 = S | last3 = Astuti | first3 = P | last4 = Dal Colle | first4 = M | last5 = Ziggiotti | first5 = S | last6 = Peretto | first6 = C| year=2014| doi-broken-date=1 November 2024 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=European Prehistory: A Survey|last=Milisauskas|first=Sarunas|publisher=Springer|year=2011|page=74|isbn=978-1-4419-6633-9|access-date=8 June 2012|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gcGSn0eVs2oC&pg=PA234 |quote=One of the earliest dates for an Aurignacian assemblage is greater than 43,000 BC from Bacho Kiro cave in Bulgaria&nbsp;...}}</ref>
In parallel, the coasts of the ] and southern ] witness the expansion of another Neolithic current of less clear origins. Settling initially in ], the bearers of the ] culture may have come from Thessalia (some of the pre-Sesklo settlements show related traits) or even from Lebanon (Byblos). They are sailors, fishermen and sheep and goat herders, and the archaeological findings show that they mixed with natives in most places.


After more than 100,000 years of uniformity, around 45,000 years ago, the Neanderthal fossil record changed abruptly. The Mousterian had quickly become more versatile and was named the ] culture, which signifies the diffusion of Aurignacian elements into Neanderthal culture. Although debated, the fact proved that Neanderthals had, to some extent, adopted the culture of modern ''Homo sapiens''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://archaeology.about.com/od/upperpaleolithic/qt/Chatelperronian-Guide.htm |title=Chatelperronian Transition to Upper Paleolithic |publisher=About.com |access-date= December 31, 2016}}</ref> However, the Neanderthal fossil record completely vanished after 40,000 years BC. Whether Neanderthals were also successful in diffusing their genetic heritage into Europe's future population or they simply went extinct and, if so, what caused the extinction cannot conclusively be answered.
Other early neolithic cultures can be found in ] and Southern ], where the epi-Gravettian locals assimilated cultural influxes from beyond the Caucasus (culture of ] and related) and in ] (Spain), where the rare Neolithic of ] appears without known origins very early (c. 5800 BCE).


] cave painting, ], 15,000 BC]]
]


Around 32,000 years ago, the ] appeared in the ] (southern ]).<ref name=orig>{{cite journal | title = The Oldest Anatomically Modern Humans from Far Southeast Europe: Direct Dating, Culture and Behavior | first1 = Sandrine | last1= Prat | first2= Stéphane C. | last2= Péan | first3= Laurent | last3= Crépin | first4 =Dorothée G. |last4= Drucker | first5 =Simon J. | last5= Puaud | first6 =Hélène | last6=Valladas | first7= Martina |last7 =Lázničková-Galetová | first8 =Johannes | last8 =van der Plicht | first9= Alexander | last9= Yanevich | journal = PLOS ONE |date = 17 June 2011 | volume = 6 | issue = 6 | pages = e20834 | publisher = plosone | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0020834 | pmid = 21698105 | pmc = 3117838 | bibcode = 2011PLoSO...620834P | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name=bbc>{{cite news | url = https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13846262 | title = Early human fossils unearthed in Ukraine | first = Jennifer | last = Carpenter |date = 20 June 2011 | publisher = BBC | access-date = 21 June 2011}}</ref> By 24,000 BC, the ] and Gravettian cultures were present in Southwestern Europe. Gravettian technology and culture have been theorised to have come with migrations of people from the Middle East, Anatolia and the Balkans, and might be linked with the transitional cultures mentioned earlier since their techniques have some similarities and are both very different from Aurignacian ones, but this issue is very obscure. The Gravettian also appeared in the ] and ] Mountains but soon disappeared from southwestern Europe, with the notable exception of the Mediterranean coasts of Iberia.
'''· Middle Neolithic:'''
This phase, starting in 5000 BCE is marked by the consolidation of the Neolithic expansion towards western and northern Europe, but also by the irruption of a new culture that, probably through violence, occupies most of the Balkans, substituting or rather subjugating the first Neolithic settlers.


The Solutrean culture, extended from northern Spain to southeastern France, includes not only a ] but also the first significant development of cave painting and the use of the needle and possibly that of the bow and arrow. The more widespread Gravettian culture is no less advanced, at least in artistic terms: sculpture (mainly ''venuses'') is the most outstanding form of creative expression of such peoples.
This is the culture of ] (Thessalia) and the related ones of ]-] (Serbia and Macedonia) and ] III-] (Bulgaria and nearby areas), this last one more hybrid than the other two.


Around 19,000 BC, Europe witnesses the appearance of a new culture, known as ], possibly rooted in the old Aurignacian one, which soon superseded the Solutrean area and also the Gravettian of Central Europe. However, in Mediterranean Iberia, Italy, the Balkans and Anatolia, ] cultures continued to evolve locally.
Meanwhile, the tiny proto-Linear Pottery culture has given birth to two very dynamic branches: the Western and Eastern ]s. The latter is basically an extension of the Balkan neolithic, but the more original western branch expands quickly, assimilating what today is Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland and even large parts of western Ukraine, Moldavia, the lowlands of Romania, and regions of France, Belgium and the Netherlands. This was all achieved in less than one thousand years. With expansion comes diversification and a number of local Danubian cultures start forming at the end of the 5th millennium.


With the Magdalenian culture, the Paleolithic development in Europe reaches its peak and this is reflected in art, owing to previous traditions of paintings and sculpture.
In the Mediterranean, the Cardium Pottery fishermen show no less dynamism and colonize/assimilate all of Italy and the the Mediterranean regions of France and Spain.


Around 12,500 BC, the ] Glacial Age ended. Slowly, through the following millennia, temperatures and sea levels rose, changing the environment of prehistoric people. Ireland and Great Britain became islands, and Scandinavia became separated from the main part of the European Peninsula. (They had all once been connected by a now-submerged region of the continental shelf known as ].) Nevertheless, the Magdalenian culture persisted until 10,000 BC, when it quickly evolved into two ''microlith'' cultures: ], in Spain and southern France, and ], in northern France and Central Europe. Despite some differences, both cultures shared several traits: the creation of very small stone tools called ]s and the scarcity of figurative art, which seems to have vanished almost completely, which was replaced by abstract decoration of tools.<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.beloit.edu/~museum/logan/paleoexhibit/masdazil.htm#thumbnails | title=Mas d'Azil|website = Logan Museum|publisher = Beloit College| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20010430150334/http://www.beloit.edu/~museum/logan/paleoexhibit/masdazil.htm |archive-date = 30 April 2001}}</ref>
Even in the Atlantic, some groups among the native hunter-gatherers start slowly incorporating the new technologies. Among those, the most noticeable regions seem to be the southwest of Iberia, influenced by the Mediterranean but specially by the Andalusian neolithic, which soon developes the first ] burials (]s) and the area around Denmark (culture of ]), influenced by the Danubian complex.


In the late phase of the epi-Paleolithic period, the Sauveterrean culture evolved into the so-called ] and strongly influenced its southern neighbour, clearly replacing it in Mediterranean Spain and Portugal. The recession of the glaciers allowed human colonisation in Northern Europe for the first time. The ] culture, derived from the Sauveterre-Tardenois culture but with a strong personality, colonised Denmark and the nearby regions, including parts of Britain.
'''· Late Neolithic:'''
This period occupies the first half of the 4th century BCE and is rather quiet. The tendencies of the previous period consolidate, so we have a fully formed Neolithic Europe with five main cultural regions:


<gallery>
]
File:Floete Schwanenknochen Geissenkloesterle Blaubeuren.jpg|], ], ] cave, 43,000 BC
File:Adorant, Geisenklösterle, Blaubeuren-Weiler, Alb-Donau-Kreis, Aurignacian culture, 35,000 to 45,000 years old, ivory - Landesmuseum Württemberg - Stuttgart, Germany - DSC02709.jpg|], Aurignacian, 42,000 to 40,000 BC
File:Loewenmensch1.jpg|], Aurignacian, c. 41,000 to 35,000 BC
File:Chauvet´s cave horses.jpg|] cave paintings, ], c. 30,000 BC
File:Vestonicka venuse edit.jpg|], ], c. 29,000 BC
File:Venus-de-Laussel-vue-generale-noir.jpg|], Gravettian, c. 23,000 BC
File:Venus of Brassempouy.jpg|], c. 23,000 BC
File:F07 0054.Ma.JPG|Antler carving, Magdalenian, 15,000 BC
</gallery>


===Mesolithic (Middle Stone Age)===
· Danubian cultures: from northern France to Western Ukraine. Now split into several local cultures, the most relevant ones being: the Romanian branch (culture of ]) that expands into Bulgaria, the ] that is preeminent in the west, and the culture of ] of Austria and western Hungary, which will have a major role in the upcoming periods.
{{main|Mesolithic Europe}}
{{further|Balkan Mesolithic|British Mesolithic|Irish Mesolithic|Azilian|Fosna–Hensbacka culture|Kunda culture}}
], France, ] culture, c. 10,000 BC.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www3.astronomicalheritage.net/index.php/show-entity?identity=83&idsubentity=1|title=The Thaïs Bone, France|website=UNESCO Portal to the Heritage of Astronomy|quote=The engraving on the Thaïs bone is a non-decorative notational system of considerable complexity. The cumulative nature of the markings together with their numerical arrangement and various other characteristics strongly suggest that the notational sequence on the main face represents a non-arithmetical record of day-by-day lunar and solar observations undertaken over a time period of as much as 3½ years. The markings appear to record the changing appearance of the moon, and in particular its crescent phases and times of invisibility, and the shape of the overall pattern suggests that the sequence was kept in step with the seasons by observations of the solstices. The latter implies that people in the Azilian period were not only aware of the changing appearance of the moon but also of the changing position of the sun, and capable of synchronizing the two. The markings on the Thaïs bone represent the most complex and elaborate time-factored sequence currently known within the corpus of Palaeolithic mobile art. The artefact demonstrates the existence, within Upper Palaeolithic (Azilian) cultures c. 12,000 years ago, of a system of time reckoning based upon observations of the phase cycle of the moon, with the inclusion of a seasonal time factor provided by observations of the solar solstices.}}</ref>|174x174px]]


A transition period in the development of human technology between the Paleolithic and the Neolithic, the ] began around 15,000 years ago. In Western Europe, the Early Mesolithic, or ], began about 14,000 years ago, in the ] of northern Spain and southern France. In other parts of Europe, the Mesolithic began by 11,500 years ago (the beginning ]) and ended with the ] of farming, which, depending on the region, occurred 8,500 to 5,500 years ago.
· Mediterranean cultures: from the Adriatic to eastern Spain, including Italy and large portions of France and Switzerland. These are also diversified into several groups.


In areas with limited glacial impact, the term "Epipaleolithic" is sometimes preferred for the period. Regions that experienced greater environmental effects as the Last Glacial Period ended had a much more apparent Mesolithic era that lasted millennia. In Northern Europe, societies were able to live well on rich food supplies from the marshlands, which had been created by the warmer climate. Such conditions produced distinctive human behaviours that are preserved in the material record, such as the Maglemosian and Azilian cultures. Such conditions delayed the coming of the Neolithic to as late as 5,500 years ago in Northern Europe.
· The area of Dimini-Vinca: Thessalia, Macedonia and Serbia, but extending its influence also to parts of the mid-Danubian basin (Tisza, ])and southern Italy.


As what ] termed the "Neolithic Package" (including agriculture, herding, polished stone axes, timber longhouses and pottery) spread into Europe, the Mesolithic way of life was marginalised and eventually disappeared.<ref>Childe 1925</ref> Controversy over the means of that dispersal is discussed below in the ''Neolithic'' section. A "]" can be distinguished between 7,200 and 5,850 years ago and ranged from Southern to Northern Europe.
· Eastern Europe: basically central and eastern Ukraine and parts of southern Russia and Byelorussia (culture of Dniepr-Don). Apparently this people were the ones who first domesticated horses (though some Paleolithic evidence could disprove it).


<gallery>
· Atlantic Europe: a mosaic of local cultures, some of them still pre-Neolithic, from Portugal to southern Sweden. Since around 3800 BCE the western regions of France incorporate also the Megalithic style of burial.
File:Laténium-dame-Monruz.jpg|], Switzerland, c. 9000 BC
File:Shigir idol.jpg|], Russia, c. 10,000 BC
File:064 Pintures de la cova dels Moros, exposició al Museu de Gavà.JPG|], Spain
File:Magura - drawings.jpg|] drawings, Bulgaria, c. 8,000- 6,000 BC
File:Boomstamkano van Pesse, Drents Museum, 1955-VIII-2.jpg|], Netherlands, c. 8000 BC
File:Huittisten hirvenpää.jpg|], Finland, c. 6500 BC
File:Lepenski Vir, muzej 13.jpg|] sculpture, Serbia, c. 7000 BC
File:Animal figurine carved from amber, Denmark.jpg|] animal figurine, ], c. 12,000 BC
File:Star Carr pendant 1.png|], Britain, c. 9000 BC
</gallery>


==Neolithic (New Stone Age)==
There are also a few independent areas: Andalusia, southern Greece and the western coasts of the Black Sea (culture of ]).
{{Main|Neolithic Europe}}
{{further|Old Europe (archaeology)}}
]


The European ] is assumed to have arrived from the Near East via ], the ] and the ]. There has been a long discussion between ''migrationists'', who claim that the Near Eastern farmers almost totally displaced the European native hunter-gatherers, and ''diffusionists'', who claim that the process was slow enough to have occurred mostly through ]. A relationship has been suggested between the spread of agriculture and the diffusion of ], with several models of migrations trying to establish a relationship, like the ], which sets the origin of Indo-European agricultural terminology in Anatolia.<ref>The supposed autochthony of Hittites, the Indo-Hittite hypothesis and the migration of agricultural "Indo-European" societies were intrinsically linked by Colin Renfrew 2001</ref>
== Chalcolithic ==


===Early Neolithic===
Also known as '''Copper Age''', European ] is a time of changes and confusion. The most relevant fact is the infiltration and invasion of large parts of the territory by people originating from Central Asia, considered by mainstream scholars to be the original ], although there are again several theories in dispute. Other phenomena are the expansion of Megalithism and the appearance of the first significant economic stratification and, related to this, the first known monarchies in the Balkan region.
Apparently related with the Anatolian culture of ], the Greek region of ] was the first place in Europe known to have acquired agriculture, cattle-herding and pottery. The early stages are known as ] culture. The Thessalian Neolithic culture soon evolved into the more coherent ] (6000 BC), which was the origin of the main branches of Neolithic expansion in Europe. The ] on the territory of modern day Bulgaria, was another early ] (Karanovo I-III ca. 62nd to 55th centuries BC) which was part of the ] and it is considered the largest and most important of the Azmak River Valley agrarian settlements.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=Native Peoples of the World: An Encyclopedia of Groups, Cultures and Contemporary Issues|last=Danver|first=Steven L.|date=2015|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9780765682222|location=Oxon|pages=271}}</ref> The Karanovo I is considered a continuation of Near Eastern settlement type.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Whittle|first1=Alasdair|title=Living Well Together? Settlement and Materiality in the Neolithic of South-East and Central Europe|last2=Hofmann|first2=Daniela|last3=Bailey|first3=Douglass W.|publisher=Oxbow Books|year=2008|isbn=978-1-78297-481-9|language=en}}</ref> The ] is dating to the period between ''c.'' 6200 and 4500 ].<ref name="Istorijski atlas">Istorijski atlas, Intersistem Kartografija, Beograd, 2010, page 11.</ref>{{sfn|Chapman|2000|p=237}} It originates in the spread of the ] of peoples and technological innovations including farming and ceramics from ]. The Starčevo culture marks its spread to the inland Balkan peninsula as the ] culture did along the Adriatic coastline. It forms part of the wider ]. Practically all of the ] was colonized in the 6th millennium from there. The expansion, reaching the easternmost Tardenoisian outposts of the upper ], gave birth to the ] culture, a significant modification of the Balkan Neolithic that was the origin of one of the most important branches of European Neolithic: the ] group of cultures. In parallel, the coasts of the ] and of southern Italy witnessed the expansion of another Neolithic current with less clear origins. Settling initially in ], the bearers of the ] culture may have come from Thessaly (some of the pre-Sesklo settlements show related traits) or even from Lebanon (Byblos). They were sailors, fishermen and sheep and goat herders, and the archaeological findings show that they mixed with natives in most places. Other early Neolithic cultures can be found in ] and Southern Russia, where the epi-Gravettian locals assimilated cultural influxes from beyond the Caucasus (e.g. the ] and related cultures) and in ] (Spain), where the rare Neolithic of ] appeared without known origins very early (c. 7800 BC).


===Middle Neolithic===
The economy of the Chalcolithic, even in the regions where copper is not used yet, is no longer that of peasant communities and tribes: now some materials are produced in specific locations and distributed to wide regions. ] of metal and stone is particularly developed in some areas, along with the processing of those materials into valuable goods.
{{Main|Middle Neolithic}}
This phase, starting 7000 years ago was marked by the consolidation of the Neolithic expansion towards western and northern Europe but also by the rise of new cultures in the Balkans, notably the ] (Thessaly) and related ] (Serbia and Romania) and ] cultures (Bulgaria and nearby areas). Meanwhile, the Proto-Linear Pottery culture gave birth to two very dynamic branches: the Western and Eastern ]s. The western branch expanded quickly, assimilating Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland and even large parts of western Ukraine, historical ], the lowlands of Romania, and regions of France, Belgium and the Netherlands, all in less than 1000 years. With this expansion came diversification and a number of local Danubian cultures started forming at the end of the 5th millennium. In the Mediterranean, the Cardium pottery fishermen showed no less dynamism and colonised or assimilated all of Italy and the Mediterranean regions of France and Spain. Even in the Atlantic, some groups among the native hunter-gatherers started the slow incorporation of the new technologies. Among them, the most noticeable regions seem to be southwestern Iberia, which was influenced by the Mediterranean but especially by the Andalusian Neolithic, which soon developed the first ] burials (]s), and the area around Denmark (] culture), influenced by the Danubian complex.


===Late Neolithic===
'''· Ancient Chalcolithic:'''
This period occupied the first half of the 6th millennium BC. The tendencies of the previous period consolidated and so there was a fully-formed Neolithic Europe, with five main cultural regions:
From c. 3500 to 3000 BCE. copper starts to be used in the Balkans, and Eastern and Central Europe. However, the key factor could be the use of horses, which would increase mobility.
# ]: from northern France to western Ukraine. Now split into several local cultures, the most relevant being the (]), the ] that was pre-eminent in the west, and the ] of Austria and western Hungary, which would have a major role in later periods.
## The area of Dimini-Vinca: Thessaly, Macedonia and Serbia but extending its influence to parts of the mid-Danubian basin (Tisza, ]) and southern Italy.
# Mediterranean cultures: from the Adriatic to eastern Spain, including Italy and large portions of France and Switzerland. They were also diversified into several groups.
# Eastern Europe: basically central and eastern ] and parts of southern Russia and ] (Dniepr-Don culture). This area has the earliest evidence for domesticated horses.
# Atlantic Europe: a mosaic of local cultures, some of them still pre-Neolithic, from Portugal to southern Sweden. In around 5800 BC, western France began to incorporate the Megalithic style of burial.


<gallery>
From c. 3500 onwards, Eastern Europe is apparently infiltrated by people originating from beyond the Volga (]), creating a plural complex known as ], that substitutes the previous Dniepr-Don culture, pushing the natives to migrate in a NW direction to the Baltic and Denmark, where they mix with natives (] A and C). Soon this migration is followed by that of the (apparently) Indo-European invaders, who settle in eastern Germany and Poland (culture of ]). Near the end of the period, another branch will leave many traces in the lower Danube area (culture of ]), in what seems to be another invasion.
File:Ancient Greece Neolithic Pottery - 28421665976.jpg|], Greece, c. 6000-5300 BC
File:NeolithicVessel B&W 1.jpg|], Bulgaria, 6th mill. BC
File:Ovcharovo tell, miniature culture scene, Bulgaria, 6th millennium BC.jpg|], Bulgaria, 5th mill. BC
File:Cultura di vinca, idolo, serbia 4500-3500 ac ca. 01.jpg|] figurine, Serbia, c. 5000 BC
File:LBK house 1.jpg|], ], 5000 BC
File:Goseck Circle 1.jpg|], Germany, 4900 BC
File:Dimini 3.jpg|], walled acropolis, Greece, c. 4800 BC
File:Gavrinis 2.jpg|] megalithic tomb, ], 4000 BC
File:Er Grah, Locmariaquer Megaliths.jpg|], ], 4500 BC
File:Monte d'Accoddi, reconstruction 1.jpg|], Sardinia, c. 3500-3000 BC.<ref>{{cite journal|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272651018|journal=Documenta Praehistorica|volume=38|title=Monte d'Accoddi and the end of the Neolithic in Sardinia (Italy)|last=Grazia Melis|first=Maria|date=2011|doi=10.4312/dp.38.16|pages=207–219}}</ref>
File:Dolmen de Menga. Interior 2.jpg|], ], c. 3700 BC
File:Irelands history.jpg|], ], 3200 BC
File:Durankulak-Golemija ostrov-Hamangia IV vessels.jpg|], ]
File:Tisza1.jpg|], ], 5300 BC<ref>{{cite web|url=https://isaw.nyu.edu/exhibitions/ritual-and-memory/objects/altar-szeged|title=Ritual and Memory: Neolithic Era and Copper Age|website=Institute for the Study of the Ancient World|date=2022}}</ref>
File:R20S09-90 (52319225595).jpg|], Sardinia, 4500 BC
File:Okoliste. Neolithic settlement 5200 BC. Bosnia and Herzegovina (cropped).jpg|], Bosnia and Herzegovina, c. 5000 BC
</gallery>


==Chalcolithic (Copper Age)==
Meanwhile the Danubian culture of ] absorbs its northern neighbours of the Czech Replublic and Poland for some centuries, only to recede in the second half of the period. In Bulgaria and Vallachia, the culture of ] evolves into a monarchy with a clearly royal cemetery near the coast of the Black Sea. This model seems to have been copied later in the Tiszan region with the culture of ]. Labor specialization, economic stratification and possibly the risk of invasion may have been the reasons behind this development. The influx of early ] (Troy I) is clear in both the expansion of metallurgy and social organization.
{{Main|Chalcolithic Europe}}
{{further|Old Europe (archaeology)}}
] elite burial, Bulgaria, 4500 BC|203x203px]]
Also known as "Copper Age", the European ] was a time of significant changes, the first of which was the invention of ]. This is first attested in the ] in the 6th millennium BC. The Balkans became a major centre for copper extraction and metallurgical production in the 5th millennium BC. Copper artefacts were traded across the region, eventually reaching eastwards across the steppes of eastern Europe as far as the ]. The 5th millennium BC also saw the appearance of economic stratification and the rise of ruling elites in the Balkan region, most notably in the ] (c. 4500 BC) in Bulgaria, which developed the first known gold metallurgy in the world.


The economy of the Chalcolithic was no longer that of peasant communities and tribes, since some materials began to be produced in specific locations and distributed to wide regions. ] of metal and stone was particularly developed in some areas, along with the processing of those materials into valuable goods.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/radiocarbon/article/view/3936 | title= The Copper Age in northern Italy | publisher=University of Arizona Libraries | access-date=December 29, 2017}}</ref>
In the western Danubian region (the Rhine and Seine basins) the culture of ] displaces its predecessor, Rössen. Meanwhile in the Mediterranean basin, several cultures (most notably ] in SE France and ] in northern Italy) converge into a functional union, of which the most significant characteristic is the distribution network of honey-coloured ]. Despite this unity, the signs of conflicts are clear, as many skeletons show violent injuries. This is the time and area where ], the famous man found in the Alps, lived.


'''Early Chalcolithic, 5500-4000 BC'''
Another significant development of this period is that the Megalithic phenomenon starts spreading to most places of the Atlantic region, bringing agriculture with it to some underdeveloped regions there.


From 5500 BC onwards, Eastern Europe was apparently infiltrated by people originating from beyond the Volga, creating a plural complex known as ], which substituted the previous ] culture in Ukraine, pushing the natives to migrate northwest to the Baltic and to Denmark, where they mixed with the natives (] A and C). The emergence of the Sredny Stog culture may be correlated with the expansion of Indo-European languages, according to the ]. Near the end of the period, around 4000 BC, another westward migration of supposed Indo-European speakers left many traces in the lower Danube area (culture of ] I) in what seems to have been an invasion.<ref>{{cite thesis |url=https://www.academia.edu/4831344 |title=Re-Examining Late Chalcolithic Cultural Collapse in South-East Europe |publisher=University of Arkansas |type=MA Thesis |access-date= January 1, 2017|last1=Smith |first1=Harvey B.}}</ref>
'''· Middle Chalcolithic:'''


] ("The Saltworks"), a prehistoric town located in present-day ], is believed by archaeologists to be the oldest town in ] - a fortified stone settlement - citadelle, inner and outer city with pottery production site and the site of a ] production facility approximately six millennia ago;<ref name=Maugh>{{cite news |title=Bulgarians find oldest European town, a salt production center |first=Thomas H. |last=Maugh II |url=https://www.latimes.com/science/la-xpm-2012-nov-01-la-sci-sn-oldest-european-town-20121101-story.html |newspaper=] |date=1 November 2012 |accessdate=1 November 2012}}</ref> it flourished ca 4700–4200 BC.<ref></ref><ref name=Squires>{{cite news |title=Archaeologists find Europe's most prehistoric town |first=Nick |last=Squires |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/bulgaria/9646541/Bulgaria-archaeologists-find-Europes-most-prehistoric-town-Provadia-Solnitsata.html |newspaper=] |date=31 October 2012 |accessdate=1 November 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://naim.bg/contentFiles/ARH_2012_1_res1.pdf |title=Salt, early complex society, urbanization: Provadia-Solnitsata (5500-4200 BC) (Abstract) |first=Vassil |last=Nikolov |publisher=] |accessdate=1 November 2012}}</ref>
This period extends along the first half of the ]E.


Meanwhile, the Danubian ] absorbed its northern neighbours in the Czech Republic and Poland for some centuries, only to recede in the second half of the period. The hierarchical model of the Varna culture seems to have been replicated later in the Tiszan region with the ]. Labour specialisation, economic stratification and possibly the risk of invasion may have been the reasons behind this development.
Most significant is the reorganization of the Danubians in the powerful ], that extends more or less to what would be the Austro-Hungarian empire in recent times. The rest of the Balkans is profoundly restructured after the invasions of the previous period but, with the exception of the culture of ] in a mountainous region, none of them show any ''eastern'' (or presumably Indo-European) traits. The new culture of ], in Bulgaria, shows the first traits of pseudo-bronze (an alloy of copper with ]). So does the first significant Aegean group: the Cycladic culture after 2800 BCE.


In the western Danubian region (the Rhine and Seine basins), the ] displaced its predecessor, the ]. Meanwhile, in the Mediterranean basin, several cultures (most notably the ] in southeastern France and the ] in northern Italy) converged into a functional union of which the most significant characteristic was the distribution network of honey-coloured ]. Despite the unity, the signs of conflicts are clear, as many skeletons show violent injuries. This was the time and area of ], the famous man found in the Alps.
In the North, for some time the supposedly Indo-European groups seem to recede temporarily, suffering a strong cultural ''danubization''.


;Middle Chalcolithic, 4000-3000 BC
In the East, the peoples of beyond the Volga (]), surely eastern Indo-Europeans, ancestors of ], ] and ], take over southern Russia and the Ukraine.
] figurine, Romania, 4000 BC|207x207px]]


This period extends through the first half of the 4th millennium BC. During this period the ] culture in Ukraine experienced a massive expansion, building the largest settlements in the world at the time, described as the first cities in the world by some scholars. The earliest known evidence for wheeled vehicles, in the form of wheeled models, also comes from Cucuteni-Trypillia sites, dated to c. 3900 BC.
In the West the only sign of unity comes from the Megalithic super-culture, which extends now from southern Sweden to southern Spain, including large parts of southern Germany as well. But the Mediterranean and Danubian groupings of the previous period appear fragmented into many smaller pieces, some of them apparently backward in technological matters.


In the Danubian region the powerful ] emerged circa 3500 BC, extending more or less across the region of ]. The rest of the Balkans was profoundly restructured after the invasions of the previous period, with the ] in the central Balkans showing pronounced eastern (or presumably Indo-European) traits. The new ] in Bulgaria (3300 BC), shows the first evidence of pseudo-bronze (or ]al bronze), as does the Baden culture and the ] (in the Aegean) after 2800 BC.<ref name="cultural" />
From c. 2800 BCE, the Danubian culture of ] pushes directly or indirectly southwards, destroying most of the rich Megalithic culture of western France.


In Eastern Europe, the ] took over southern Russia and Ukraine. In ], the only sign of unity came from the Megalithic ], which extended from southern Sweden to southern Spain, including large parts of southern Germany as well. However, the Mediterranean and Danubian groupings of the previous period appear to have fragmented into many smaller pieces, some of them apparently backward in technological matters. From 2800 BC, the Danubian ] pushed directly or indirectly southwards and destroyed most of the rich Megalithic culture of western France. After 2600 BC, several phenomena prefigured the changes of the upcoming period:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://alterling.ucoz.de/index/ethnicity_of_the_neolithic_and_eneolithic_cultures_of_eastern_europe/0-37 |title=Alternative Linguiatics – Ethnicity of the Neolithic and Chalcolithic cultures of Eastern Europe |publisher=Alterling ucoz de |access-date= January 1, 2017}}</ref>
After c. 2600 several phenomena will prefigure the changes of the upcoming period:


· Large towns with stone walls appear in two different areas of the Iberian Peninsula: one in the Portuguese region of ] (culture of ]), strongly embedded in the Atlantic Megalithic culture; the other near ] (SE Spain), centered around the large town of ], of Mediterranean character, probably affected by eastern cultural influxes ('']''). Despite the many differences the two civilizations seem to be in friendly contact and to have productive exchanges. Large towns with stone walls appeared in two different areas of the Iberian Peninsula: one in the Portuguese region of ] (culture of ]), strongly embedded in the Atlantic Megalithic culture; the other near ] (southeastern Spain), centred around the large town of ], of Mediterranean character, probably affected by eastern cultural influxes ('']''). Despite the many differences, both civilisations seem to have had friendly contact and to productive exchanges. In the area of ] (], France), a new unexpected culture of ] appears: the ] culture soon takes control of western and even northern France and Belgium. In Poland and nearby regions, the putative Indo-Europeans reorganised and reconsolidated with the culture of the Globular Amphoras. Nevertheless, the influence of many centuries in direct contact with the still-powerful Danubian peoples had greatly modified their culture.<ref name = cultural>{{cite book |last1=Haarmann |first1=Harald |title=Early civilization and literacy in Europe : an inquiry into cultural continuity in the Mediterranean world |date=1996 |publisher=Mouton de Gruyter |location=Berlin |isbn= 978-3110146516 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vXFW36L1hu4C&q=Chalcolithic+Europe&pg=PA49}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |jstor=280864 |title=Neolithic, Chalcolithic, and Early Bronze in West Mediterranean Europe |journal=American Antiquity |volume=51 |issue=4 |pages=763 |doi=10.2307/280864 |year=2017 |last1=Wells |first1=Peter S. |last2=Geddes |first2=David S. |s2cid=163672997 }}</ref>


<gallery>
· In the area of ] (], France), a new unexpected culture of ] appears: it is the culture of ], that soon takes control of western and even northern France and Belgium.
File:Grave offerings.jpg|], Bulgaria, 4500 BC
File:Neolithic Pottery (28650540752).jpg|] pottery, Ukraine
File:Maidanetske 3D model.jpg|], Ukraine, c. 3800 BC
File:Bodrogkeresztur gold.jpg|], Hungary, 4000-3600 BC
File:Malta - Qrendi - Hagar Qim and Mnajdra Archaeological Park - Hagar Qim 08 ies.jpg|] temple, ], 3600-3200 BC
File:The Sleeping Lady, 2009.jpg|] figurine, Malta, 3300–3000 BC
File:Ancient Greece Neolithic Gold Ornaments (28421389976).jpg|], Greece, c. 4000 BC
File:Baden wagon 1.jpg|], Hungary, 3300 BC
File:Skarpsallingkarret DO-9665 original.jpg|], Denmark, 3200 BC
File:Wheel 1a.jpg|], ], 3150 BC
File:Los Millares recreacion cuadro.jpg|], Spain, c. 3100 BC
File:Керносовский идол.png|] stone stele, Ukraine, c. 2600 BC
File:Campaniforme M.A.N. 04.JPG|] burial, Spain, c. 2500 BC
File:Stonehenge - panoramio - dtobias (1).jpg|], ], 2500 BC
File:Silbury 1.jpg|], Britain, c. 2400 BC
File:Blessington 1c.jpg|], Ireland, c. 2400 BC
</gallery>


==Bronze Age==
· In Poland and nearby regions, the (seemingly) Indo-Europeans reorganize and consolidate again with the culture of the Globular Amphoras. Nevertheless, the influence of many centuries in direct contact with the still-powerful Danubian peoples has greatly modified their culture.
{{Main|Bronze Age Europe}}
] marble figurine, 2700 BC|219x219px]]
Use of Bronze begins in the ] around 3200 BC. From 2500 BC the new ], whose origins were obscure but were also Indo-Europeans, displaced the Yamna peoples in the regions north and east of the Black Sea, confining them to their original area east of the Volga. Around 2400 BC, the ] replaced their predecessors and expanded to Danubian and Nordic areas of western Germany. One related branch invaded Denmark and southern Sweden (]), and the mid-Danubian basin, though showing more continuity, had clear traits of new Indo-European elites (]). Simultaneously, in the West, the Artenac peoples reached Belgium. With the partial exception of Vučedol, the Danubian cultures, which had been so buoyant just a few centuries ago, were wiped off the map of Europe. The rest of the period was the story of a mysterious phenomenon: the ], which seemed to be of a mercantile character and to have preferred being buried according to a very specific, almost invariable, ritual. Nevertheless, out of their original area of western Central Europe, they appeared only within local cultures and so they never invaded and assimilated but went to live among those peoples and kept their way of life, which is why they are believed to be merchants.


The rest of Europe remained mostly unchanged and apparently peaceful. In 2300 BC, the first Beaker Pottery appeared in Bohemia and expanded in many directions but particularly westward, along the Rhone and the seas, reaching the culture of Vila Nova (Portugal) and Catalonia (Spain) as their limits. Simultaneously but unrelatedly, in 2200 BC in the Aegean region, the ] culture decayed and was substituted by the new palatine phase of the ] culture of ].
'''· Late Chalcolithic:'''
This period extends from c. 2500 BCE to c. 1800 or 1700 BCE (depending on the region). The dates are general for the whole of Europe, and the Aegean area is already fully in the Bronze Age.


The second phase of Beaker Pottery, from 2100 BC onwards, is marked by the displacement of the centre of the phenomenon to Portugal, within the culture of Vila Nova. The new centre's influence reached to all of southern and western France but was absent in southern and western Iberia, with the notable exception of Los Millares. After 1900 BC, the centre of the Beaker Pottery returned to Bohemia, and in Iberia, a decentralisation of the phenomenon occurred, with centres in Portugal but also in Los Millares and ].
C. 2500 BCE the new ] (proto-Cymmerians), whose origins are obscure but who are also Indo-Europeans, displaces the peoples of the Jamnaja Kultura in the regions north and east of the Black Sea, confining them to their original area east of the Volga. Some of these infiltrate Poland and may have played a significant but unclear role in the transformation of the culture of the ] into the new culture of ].


], ], 1800 BC|188x188px]]
Whatever happened, the fact is that c. 2400 BCE this people of the Corded Ware replace their predecessors and expand to Danubian and Nordic areas of western Germany. One related branch invades Denmark and southern Sweden (]), while the mid-Danubian basin, though showing more continuity, shows also clear traits of new Indo-European elites (culture of ]).


Though the use of ] started much earlier in the Aegean area (c. 3.200 BC), c. 2300 BC can be considered typical for the start of the Bronze Age in Europe in general.
Simultaneously, in the west, the peoples of Artenac reach Belgium. With the partial exception of Vucedol, the Danubian cultures, so buoyant just a few centuries ago, are wiped off the map of Europe.


* c. 2300 BC, the Central European cultures of ], ], ] and pre-] started working bronze, a technique that reached them through the Balkans and Danube.
The rest of the period is the story of a mysterious phenomenon: the ]. This group seems to be of mercantile character and to like being buried according to a very specific, almost invariable, ritual. Nevertheless, out of their original area of western Central Europe, they appear only inside local cultures, so they never invaded and assimilated but rather went to live among those peoples, keeping their way of life. This is why they are believed to be merchants.
* c. 1800 BC, the culture of ], in Southwestern Spain, was substituted by that of ], fully of the Bronze Age, which may well have been a centralised state.
* c. 1700 BC is considered a reasonable date to place the start of ], after centuries of infiltration of Indo-European Greeks of an unknown origin.
* c. 1600 BC, most of these Central European cultures were unified in the powerful ]. Simultaneously but unrelatedly, the culture of ] started Phase B, which was characterised by a detectable Aegean influence ('']'' burials). About then, it is believed that ] fell under the rule of the ].
* Around 1300 BC, the Indo-European cultures of Central Europe, such as ], ] and certainly ], changed the cultural phase conforming to the expansionist ] culture, starting a quick expansion that brought them to occupy most of the Balkans, Asia Minor, where they destroyed the ] (conquering the secret of ] ]), northeastern Italy, parts of France, Belgium, the Netherlands, northeastern Spain and southwestern England.


Derivations of the sudden expansion were the ], who attacked Egypt unsuccessfully for some time, including the ] (]?) and the ], most likely Hellenised members of the group that ended invading Greek itself and destroying the might of ] and later ].
The rest of the continent remains mostly unchanged and in apparent peace.


Simultaneously, around then, the culture of ], which lasted 1300 years in its urban form, vanishes into a less spectacular one but finally with bronze. The centre of gravity of the Atlantic cultures (the ] complex) was now displaced towards Great Britain. Also about then, the ], the possible precursor of the ], appeared in central Italy, possibly with an Aegean origin.
From c. 2300 BCE the first Beaker Pottery appears in Bohemia and expands in many directions but particularly westward, along the Rhone and the sea shores, reaching the culture of Vila Nova (Portugal) and Catalonia (Spain) as their limits.


<gallery>
Simultaneously but unrelatedly, c. 2200 BCE in the Aegean region, the ] culture decays, being substituted by the new palatine phase of the ] culture of ].
File:Knossos1.jpg|] palace at ], Crete, c. 1700 BC
File:Mycenae 3a.jpg|] diadem, Greece, c. 1600 BC
File:Treasury of Atreus Mycenae.jpg|], Greece, c. 1300 BC
File:Bush Barrow.jpg|], ], 1900 BC
File:Solvognen-00100.jpg|], ], 1500 BC
File:Diadem1.jpg|] gold diadem, Spain, 1600 BC
File:Nuraghe Santu Antine 02.jpg|], Sardinia, c. 1600 BC
File:Navicella nuragica.jpg|] ship model, Sardinia, 1000 BC
File:Valchitran-treasure.jpg|], Bulgaria, c. 1300 BC
File:В музее - заповеднике Аркаим.jpg|] chariot, Russia, c. 2000 BC
File:Ricostruzione grafica della Terramara di Montale (Modena), disegno di Riccardo Merlo.jpg|], Italy, 1650–1150 BC
File:Età del bronzo finale, due spade, 1300-800 ac ca..JPG|], ], 1000 BC
File:Neues Museum, Berlin 2017 099.jpg|], Germany, c. 1000 BC
File:Cuirasses Marmesse.JPG|], France, c. 900 BC
File:Hühnenburg bei Watenstedt rekonstruktion.jpg|], Germany, c. 1100 BC
File:Spoked wheel from Arokalja.jpg|], Romania, c. 13th century BC
</gallery>


==Iron Age==
The second phase of Beaker Pottery, from c.2100 BCE onwards, is marked by the displacement of the center of this phenomenon to Portugal, inside the culture of Vila Nova. This new center's influence reaches to all southern and western France but is absent in southern and western Iberia, with the notable exception of Los Millares.
{{Main|Iron Age Europe}}
{{further|Hallstatt culture|La Tène culture|Archaeology of Northern Europe}}


Though the use of ] was known to the Aegean peoples about 1100 BC, it failed to reach Central Europe before 800 BC, when it gave way to the ], an Iron Age evolution of the ].
After c. 1900 BCE, the center of the Beaker Pottery returns to Bohemia, while in Iberia we see a decentralization of the phenomenon, with centers in Portugal but also in Los Millares and ].
Around then, the ], benefitting from the disappearance of the Greek maritime power (]) founded their first colony at the entrance of the Atlantic Ocean, in Gadir (modern ]), most likely as a merchant outpost to convey the many mineral resources of Iberia and the British Isles.


Nevertheless, from the 7th century BC onwards, the Greeks recovered their power and started their own colonial expansion, founding Massalia (modern ]) and the Iberian outpost of Emporion (modern ]). That occurred only after the ] could reconquer ] and the ] valley from the Celts, separating physically the Iberian Celts from their continental neighbours.
== Bronze Age ==


The second phase of the European Iron Age was defined particularly by the Celtic ], which started around 400 BC, followed by a large expansion of them into the Balkans, the British Isles, where they assimilated ], and other regions of France and Italy.
Though the use of ] started much earlier in the Aegean area, it is not before 1800 BCE that it reaches southern Spain, while Central Europe will wait another century (c. 1700 BCE) and the Atlantic region will remain Chalcolithic until 1300 BCE (noticeably Egypt remained in the same ''backward'' technological state until much later). In any case, the date of 1800/1700 BCE can be considered typical for the start of this stage in Europe in general, although some scholars claim earlier dates for the introduction of bronze (this may be caused by the slim barrier between copper and bronze, an ] of the former).


The decline of Celtic power under the expansive pressure of ] (originally from ] and ]) and the forming of the Roman Empire during the 1st century BC was also that of the end of prehistory, properly speaking; though many regions of Europe remained illiterate and therefore out of reach of written history for many centuries, the boundary must be placed somewhere, and that date, near the start of the calendar, seems to be quite convenient. The remaining is regional prehistory, or, in most cases, ], but no longer European prehistory, as a whole.
c. 1800 BCE, the culture of Los Millares in SW Spain is substituted by that of ], fully of the Bronze age, which may well have been a centralized state.


<gallery>
c. 1700 BCE, the Central European cultures of ], ], ] and pre-] start working the Bronze, a technique that reached them through the Balkans and Danube.
File:Protogeometric amphora BM A1124.jpg|] amphora, Greece, c. 975–950 BC
File:Corredo della tomba maschile 871 della necropoli di casal del fosso, 730-720 ac ca. 01.jpg|] warrior burial, ], 730 BC
File:Hallstatt culture Kleinklein - muscle cuirasses & double ridge helmet.jpg|] armour, Austria, 7th century BC
File:Hochdorf Chieftain's Grave reconstruction.jpg|] ], ], 530 BC
File:Palais Lassois07.jpg|], Hallstatt culture, ], 500 BC
File:Sofia - Panagyurishte Thracian Gold Treasure.jpg|], Bulgaria, 400–300 BC
File:Sveshtari Thracian tomb Bulgaria IFB.JPG|] tomb, ], 3rd century BC
File:Pektoral111.JPG|] gold pectoral, Ukraine, 4th century BC
File:Casco (51642727532).jpg|] gold helmet, Romania, c. 400 BC
File:London - British Museum - 2453.jpg|], ], c.350–50 BC
File:Broch of Mousa - geograph.org.uk - 2079773.jpg|], ], c. 300-100 BC
File:Dama de Elche.jpg|], ], 4th century BC
File:Oppidium Manching Osttor Modell.jpg|Celtic ] of ], Germany, 2nd century BC
File:Broighter Gold, Dublin, October 2010 (02).JPG|], ], c. 100 BC
File:Dôme aux dragons - Bronze gaulois de Roissy, dans le Lieu dit de La Fosse Cotheret (Val d'Oise).jpg|Chariot fitting, ], France
File:Dejbjerg wagon, Nationalmuseet Copenhagen.jpg|], ], 1st century BC
</gallery>


==Genetic history==
c. 1600 BCE is considered a good approximate date to place the start of ] Greece, after centuries of infiltration of Indo-European Greeks from an unknown origin.
{{Main|Genetic history of Europe}}
] spread ] Steppe pastoralist ancestry and ] across large parts of Eurasia.<ref>{{cite news |title=Steppe migrant thugs pacified by Stone Age farming women |url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170404084429.htm |work=] |publisher=Faculty of Science - University of Copenhagen |date=4 April 2017}}</ref>]]
The genetic history of Europe has been inferred by observing the patterns of genetic diversity across the continent and in the surrounding areas. Use has been made of both classical genetics and molecular genetics.<ref>Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1994</ref><ref>Metspalu et al. 2004</ref> Analysis of the DNA of the modern population of Europe has mainly been used but use has also been made of ancient DNA.


This analysis has shown that modern man entered Europe from the Near East before the Last Glacial Maximum but retreated to refuges in southern Europe in this cold period. Subsequently, people spread out over the whole continent, with subsequent limited migration from the Near East and Asia.<ref>Achilli et al. 2004</ref>
c. 1500 BCE, most of these Central European cultures are unified in the powerful ] culture. Simultanously but unrelatedly, the culture of El Argar starts its phase B, characterized by a detectable Aegean influence ('']'' burials). About this time, it is believed that Minoan Crete fell under the rule of the Mycenean Greeks.


According to a study in 2017, the early farmers belonged predominantly to the paternal ].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lipson|first1=Mark|last2=Szécsényi-Nagy|first2=Anna|last3=Mallick|first3=Swapan|last4=Pósa|first4=Annamária|last5=Stégmár|first5=Balázs|last6=Keerl|first6=Victoria|last7=Rohland|first7=Nadin|last8=Stewardson|first8=Kristin|last9=Ferry|first9=Matthew|date=2017-11-16|title=Parallel paleogenomic transects reveal complex genetic history of early European farmers|journal=Nature|volume=551|issue=7680|pages=368–372|doi=10.1038/nature24476|issn=0028-0836|pmc=5973800|pmid=29144465|bibcode=2017Natur.551..368L}}</ref> The maternal haplogroup ] was also frequent in the farmers.<ref>{{harvnb|Crabtree|Bogucki|2017|p=55}}</ref>
c. 1300 BCE, the Indo-European cultures of Central Europe (among them ], ] and certainly ]) change the cultural phase conforming to the expansionist ] culture, starting a quick expansion that brings them to occupy most of the Balkans, Asia Minor, where they destroy the ] (conquering the secret of ] ]), NE Italy, parts of France, Belgium, the Nederlands, NW Spain and SW England.


Evidence from genome analysis of ancient human remains suggests that the modern native populations of Europe largely descend from three distinct lineages: Mesolithic ]s, derivative of the Cro-Magnon population of Europe, ] (EEF) introduced to Europe during the ], and ] which expanded to Europe in the context of the ].<ref>{{cite news |title=When the First Farmers Arrived in Europe, Inequality Evolved |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-the-first-farmers-arrived-in-europe-inequality-evolved/ |work=Scientific American |date=1 July 2020}}</ref> The Early European Farmers migrated from Anatolia to the Balkans in large numbers during the 7th millennium BC.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lipson |first1=Mark |last2=Szécsényi-Nagy |first2=Anna |display-authors=1 |date=November 8, 2017 |title=Parallel palaeogenomic transects reveal complex genetic history of early European farmers |url= |journal=] |publisher=] |volume=551 |issue=7680 |pages=368–372 |doi=10.1038/nature24476 |pmc=5973800 |pmid=29144465 |bibcode=2017Natur.551..368L |ref={{harvid|Lipson et al.|2017}}}}</ref>
Derivations of this sudden expansion are the ] that attacked Egypt unsuccessfully for some time, including the ] and the ], most likely hellenized members of this group that ended invading Greek itself and destroying the might of ] and, later, Troy.
During the ] and early ], the EEF-derived cultures of Europe were overwhelmed by successive invasions of ] (WSHs) from the ], who carried about 60% ] (EHG) and 40% ] (CHG) admixture. These invasions led to EEF ] DNA lineages in Europe being almost entirely replaced with EHG/WSH paternal DNA (mainly ] and ]). EEF ] DNA (mainly haplogroup N) also declined, being supplanted by steppe lineages,<ref>{{cite book |last1=Crabtree |first1=Pam J. |last2=Bogucki |first2=Peter |title=European Archaeology as Anthropology: Essays in Memory of Bernard Wailes |date=25 January 2017 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |isbn=978-1-934536-90-2 |page=55 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2A76DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA55 |language=en}}p.55: "In addition, uniparental markers changed suddenly as mtDNA N1a and Y haplogroup G2a, which had been very common in the EEF agricultural population, were replaced by Y haplogroups R1a and R1b and by a variety of mtDNA haplogroups typical of the Steppe Yamnaya population. The uniparental markers show that the migrants included both men and women from the steppes."</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Översti |first1=Sanni |last2=Majander |first2=Kerttu |last3=Salmela |first3=Elina |last4=Salo |first4=Kati |last5=Arppe |first5=Laura |last6=Belskiy |first6=Stanislav |last7=Etu-Sihvola |first7=Heli |last8=Laakso |first8=Ville |last9=Mikkola |first9=Esa |last10=Pfrengle |first10=Saskia |last11=Putkonen |first11=Mikko |last12=Taavitsainen |first12=Jussi-Pekka |last13=Vuoristo |first13=Katja |last14=Wessman |first14=Anna |last15=Sajantila |first15=Antti |last16=Oinonen |first16=Markku |last17=Haak |first17=Wolfgang |last18=Schuenemann |first18=Verena J. |last19=Krause |first19=Johannes |last20=Palo |first20=Jukka U. |last21=Onkamo |first21=Päivi |title=Human mitochondrial DNA lineages in Iron-Age Fennoscandia suggest incipient admixture and eastern introduction of farming-related maternal ancestry |journal=Scientific Reports |date=15 November 2019 |volume=9 |issue=1 |pages=16883 |doi=10.1038/s41598-019-51045-8 |pmid=31729399 |pmc=6858343 |bibcode=2019NatSR...916883O |language=en |issn=2045-2322}} ""The subsequent spread of Yamnaya-related people and Corded Ware Culture in the late Neolithic and Bronze Age were accompanied with the increase of haplogroups I, U2 and T1 in Europe (See8 and references therein)."</ref> suggesting the migrations involved both males and females from the steppe. EEF mtDNA, however, remained frequent, suggesting admixture between WSH males and EEF females.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Juras |first1=Anna |last2=Chyleński |first2=Maciej |display-authors=1 |date=August 2, 2018 |title=Mitochondrial genomes reveal an east to west cline of steppe ancestry in Corded Ware populations |url= |journal=] |publisher=] |volume=8 |issue=11603 |page=11603 |doi=10.1038/s41598-018-29914-5 |pmc=6072757 |pmid=30072694 |bibcode=2018NatSR...811603J |ref={{harvid|Juras et al.|2018}}}}</ref><ref>Kristian Kristiansen, Morten E. Allentoft, Karin M. Frei, Rune Iversen, Niels N. Johannsen, Guus Kroonen, Łukasz Pospieszny, T. Douglas Price, Simon Rasmussen, Karl-Göran Sjögren, Martin Sikora, Eske Willerslev. . '']'', Volume 91, Issue 356, April 2017, pp. 334 - 347.</ref>


==Linguistic history==
Simultaneously, around this date, the culture of Vila Nova de Sao Pedro (that lasted 13 centuries in its urban form) vanishes into a less spectacular one but finally with bronze. The center of gravity of the Atlantic cultures (] complex) is now displaced towards Great Britain.
{{Main|Paleo-European languages|Pre-Indo-European languages}}
The written linguistic record in Europe first begins with the ] record of ] in the Late Bronze Age.
Unattested languages spoken in Europe in the Bronze and Iron Ages are the object of reconstruction in ], in the case of Europe predominantly ].


Indo-European is assumed to have spread from the ] at the very beginning of the Bronze Age, reaching Western Europe contemporary with the ], after about 5,000 years ago.
Also about this date, the culture of ], clear precursor of the ], appears in central Italy (possibly with an Aegean origin).


Various pre-Indo-European substrates have been postulated, but remain speculative; the "]" and "]" substrates of the Mediterranean world, an "]" (which may itself have been an early form of Indo-European), a "]" substrate ancestral to the modern ],<ref>Vennemann 2003</ref> or a more widespread presence of early ] in northern Europe.<ref>Wiik 2002.</ref>
== Iron Age ==
An early presence of Indo-European throughout Europe has also been suggested ("]").<ref>Adams and Otte 1999</ref>


] emphasizes the "great linguistic diversity" which would generally have been predominant in any area inhabited by small-scale, tribal pre-state societies.<ref name="Ringe 2009">{{cite web|last=Ringe|first=Don|title=The Linguistic Diversity of Aboriginal Europe|url=http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=980|website=Language Log|publisher=Mark Liberman|access-date=22 September 2011|author-link=Donald Ringe|date=January 6, 2009}}</ref>
Though the use of ] was known to the Aegean peoples about 1100 BCE, it didn't reach Central Europe before 800 BCE, giving way to the ], an Iron Age evolution of the culture the Urn Fields. Probably as by-product of this technological superiority of the Indo-Europeans, soon after, they clearly consolidate their positions in Italy and Iberia, penetrating deep inside those peninsulas (] founded in 753 BCE).


==See also==
Around that time the ], benefitting form the disappearance of the Greek maritime power (]) founded their first colony at the entrance of the Atlantic Ocean: in Gadir (modern ]), most likely as a merchant outpost to covey the many mineral resources of the Iberian Peninsula and the British Isles.
{{div col|colwidth=18em}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{div col end}}


==References==
Nevertheless, from the 7th century BCE onwards, the Greek nation recovers its power and starts its own colonial expansion, founding Massalia (modern ]) and its Iberian outpost of Emporion (modern ]). This last thing wasn't done before the ] could reconquer ] and the ] valley from the Celts, separating physically the Iberian Celts from their continental neighbours.
{{reflist}}


==Sources==
The second phase of the European Iron Age is defined particularly by the Celtic ] culture, that starts near 400 BCE, followed by a large expansion of this people into the Balkans, the British Isles (where they assimilated ]) and other regions of France and Italy.
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite journal | last1 = Achilli | first1 = Alessandro | last2 = Rengo | first2 = Chaira | last3 = Magri | first3 = Chiara | last4 = Battaglia | first4 = Vincenza | last5 = Olivieri | first5 = Anna | last6 = Scozari | first6 = Rosaria | last7 = Cruciani | first7 = Fulvio | last8 = Zeviani | first8 = Massimo | last9 = Briem | first9 = Egill | last10 = Carelli | first10 = Valerio | last11 = Moral | first11 = Pedro | last12 = Dugoujon | first12 = Jean-Michel | last13 = Roostalu | first13 = Urmas | last14 = Loogväli | first14 = Eva-Liss | last15 = Kivisild | first15 = Toomas | last16 = Bandelt | first16 = Hans-Jürgen | last17 = Richards | first17 = Martin | last18 = Villems | first18 = Richard | last19 = Santachiara-Benerecetti | first19 = A. Silvana | last20 = Semino | first20 = Ornella | last21 = Torroni | first21 = Antonio | year = 2004 | title = The Molecular Dissection of mtDNA Haplogroup H Confirms that the Franco-Cantabrian Glacial Refuge was a Major Source for the European Gene Pool | journal = American Journal of Human Genetics | volume = 75 | issue = 5| pages = 910–918 | doi=10.1086/425590 | pmid=15382008 | pmc=1182122}}
* {{cite journal | last1 = Adams | first1 = Jonathan | last2 = Otte | first2 = Marcel | year = 1999 | title = Did Indo-European Languages Spread Before Farming? | journal = Current Anthropology | volume = 40 | issue = 1| pages = 73–77 | doi=10.1086/515804| s2cid = 143134729 }}
* Childe, V. Gordon. 1925. ''The Dawn of European Civilization''. New York: Knopf.
* Childe V.Gordon. 1950. ''Prehistoric Migrations in Europe''. Oslo: Aschehoug.
* Cavalli-Sforza L.L., Paolo Menozzi, Alberto Piazza. 1994. ''The History and Geography of Human Genes''. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
* {{cite journal | last1 = Finnilä | first1 = Saara | last2 = Lehtonen | first2 = Mervi S. | last3 = Majamaa | first3 = Kari | year = 2001 | title = Phylogenetic Network for European mtDNA | journal = American Journal of Human Genetics | volume = 68 | issue = 6| pages = 1475–1484 | doi=10.1086/320591 | pmid=11349229 | pmc=1226134}}
* {{cite journal | last1 = Gimbutas | first1 = M | year = 1980 | title = The Kurgan wave migration (c. 3400–3200 B.C.) into Europe and the following transformation of culture | journal = Journal of Near Eastern Studies | volume = 8 | pages = 273–315 }}
* {{cite journal | last1 = Macaulay | first1 = Vincent | last2 = Richards | first2 = Martin | last3 = Hickey | first3 = Eileen | last4 = Vega | first4 = Emilce | last5 = Cruciani | first5 = Fulvio | last6 = Guida | first6 = Valentina | last7 = Scozzari | first7 = Rosaria | last8 = Bonné-Tamir | first8 = Batsheva | last9 = Sykes | first9 = Bryan | last10 = Torroni | first10 = Antonio | year = 1999 | title = The Emerging Tree of West Eurasian mtDNAs: A Synthesis of Control-Region Sequences and RFLPs | journal = American Journal of Human Genetics | volume = 64 | issue = 1| pages = 232–249 | doi=10.1086/302204 | pmid=9915963 | pmc=1377722}}
* Metspalu, Mait, Toomas Kivisild, Ene Metspalu, Jüri Parik, Georgi Hudjashov, Katrin Kaldma, Piia Serk, Monika Karmin, Doron M Behar, M Thomas P Gilbert, Phillip Endicott, Sarabjit Mastana, Surinder S Papiha, Karl Skorecki, Antonio Torroni and Richard Villems. 2004. "Most of the extant mtDNA boundaries in South and Southwest Asia were likely shaped during the initial settlement of Eurasia by anatomically modern humans." ''BMC Genetics'' 5
* Piccolo, Salvatore. 2013. ''Ancient Stones: The Prehistoric Dolmens of Sicily''. Abingdon (GB): Brazen Head Publishing.
* Renfrew, Colin. 2001. "The Anatolian origins of Proto-Indo-European and the autochthony of the Hittites." In ''Greater Anatolia and the Indo-Hittite Language Family'', ] ed., pp.&nbsp;36–63. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.
* Venemann, Theo. 2003. ''Europa Vasconica, Europa Semitica''. Trends in Linguistic Studies and Monographs No. 138. New York and Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
* Wiik, Kalevi. 2002. ''Europpalaisten Juuret''. Athens: Juvaskylä
{{refend}}


==External links==
The Celtic debacle under the expansive pressure of ] (originally from ] and ]) and the forming Roman Empire, in the last century BCE, is also that of the end of Prehistory properly speaking; though many regions of Europe remained yet illiterate and therefore out of written history for many centuries yet, we must place the boundary somewhere and this date, near the start of our calendar, seems quite convenient. The remaining is regional prehistory (or in most cases ]) but no longer European prehistory as a whole.
{{commons category-inline}}
{{Wikivoyage|Prehistoric Europe|Prehistoric Europe|travel information}}
*
*
*
*
*
*
Paleolithic sanctuaries:
*
*


{{Prehistoric Europe|state=expanded}}
== See also ==
{{Prehistoric technology}}
{{History of Europe}}


]
*]

]
]
{{History of Europe}}

Latest revision as of 12:00, 12 November 2024

Prehistoric Europe
Early Prehistory
Lower PaleolithicHomo antecessor
Homo heidelbergensis
Middle PaleolithicHomo neanderthalensis
Upper PaleolithicHomo neanderthalensis, Homo sapiens population of all regions
MesolithicHunter-gatherers
NeolithicAgriculture,
herding, pottery
Late Prehistory
ChalcolithicOld Europe (archaeology), Indo-Europeans, Varna culture
Bronze AgeMinoan Crete, Mycenaean civilization, Korakou culture, Cycladic culture, Lusatian culture, Yamnaya culture
Iron AgeAncient Greece, Thracians, Ancient Rome,
Iberians, Germanic tribes, Hallstatt culture
map Europe portal
Tarxien Temples, Malta, around 3150 BC

Prehistoric Europe refers to Europe before the start of written records, beginning in the Lower Paleolithic. As history progresses, considerable regional unevenness in cultural development emerges and grows. The region of the eastern Mediterranean is, due to its geographic proximity, greatly influenced and inspired by the classical Middle Eastern civilizations, and adopts and develops the earliest systems of communal organization and writing. The Histories of Herodotus (from around 440 BC) is the oldest known European text that seeks to systematically record traditions, public affairs and notable events.

Overview

See also: History of Europe

Widely dispersed, isolated finds of individual fossils of bone fragments (Atapuerca, Mauer mandible), stone artifacts or assemblages suggest that during the Lower Paleolithic, spanning from 3 million until 300,000 years ago, palaeo-human presence was rare and typically separated by thousands of years. The karstic region of the Atapuerca Mountains in Spain represents the currently earliest known and reliably dated location of residence for more than a single generation and a group of individuals.

Homo neanderthalensis emerged in Eurasia between 600,000 and 350,000 years ago as the earliest body of European people that left behind a substantial tradition, a set of evaluable historic data through a rich fossil record in Europe's limestone caves and a patchwork of occupation sites over large areas. These include Mousterian cultural assemblages. Modern humans arrived in Mediterranean Europe during the Upper Paleolithic between 45,000 and 43,000 years ago, and both species occupied a common habitat for several thousand years. Research has so far produced no universally accepted conclusive explanation as to what caused the Neanderthal's extinction between 40,000 and 28,000 years ago.

Homo sapiens later populated the entire continent during the Mesolithic, and advanced north, following the retreating ice sheets of the last glacial maximum that spanned between 26,500 and 19,000 years ago. A 2015 publication on ancient European DNA collected from Spain to Russia concluded that the original hunter-gatherer population had assimilated a wave of "farmers" who had arrived from the Near East during the Neolithic about 8,000 years ago.

The Mesolithic era site Lepenski Vir in modern-day Serbia, the earliest documented sedentary community of Europe with permanent buildings, as well as monumental art, precedes by many centuries sites previously considered to be the oldest known. The community's year-round access to a food surplus prior to the introduction of agriculture was the basis for the sedentary lifestyle. However, the earliest record for the adoption of elements of farming can be found in Starčevo, a community with close cultural ties.

Belovode and Pločnik, also in Serbia, is currently the oldest reliably dated copper smelting site in Europe (around 7,000 years ago). It is attributed to the Vinča culture, which on the contrary provides no links to the initiation of or a transition to the Chalcolithic or Copper Age.

The process of smelting bronze is an imported technology with debated origins and history of geographic cultural profusion. It was established in Europe about 3200 BC in the Aegean and production was centered around Cyprus, the primary source of copper for the Mediterranean for many centuries.

The introduction of metallurgy, which initiated unprecedented technological progress, has also been linked with the establishment of social stratification, the distinction between rich and poor, and use of precious metals as the means to fundamentally control the dynamics of culture and society.

The European Iron Age culture also originates in the East through the absorption of the technological principles obtained from the Hittites about 1200 BC, finally arriving in Northern Europe by 500 BC.

During the Iron Age, Central, Western and most of Eastern Europe gradually entered the actual historical period. Greek maritime colonization and Roman terrestrial conquest form the basis for the diffusion of literacy in large areas to this day. This tradition continued in an altered form and context for the most remote regions (Greenland and Eastern Balts, 13th century) via the universal body of Christian texts, including the incorporation of East Slavic peoples and Russia into the Orthodox cultural sphere. Latin and ancient Greek languages continued to be the primary and best way to communicate and express ideas in liberal arts education and the sciences all over Europe until the early modern period.

Stone Age

Paleolithic (Old Stone Age)

Further information: Paleolithic Europe

Oldest fossils, artifacts and sites

Name Abstract Age Location Information Coordinates
Dmanisi skull 5 Homo erectus 1.77 Mio Dmanisi "early Homo adult with small brains but large body mass" 41°19′N 44°12′E / 41.317°N 44.200°E / 41.317; 44.200
Lézignan-la-Cèbe Lithic Assemblage 1.57 Mio Lézignan-la-Cébe a 30 pebble culture, lithic tools, argon dated 43°29′N 3°26′E / 43.483°N 3.433°E / 43.483; 3.433
Kozarnika limestone cave 1.5 Mio Kozarnika Human molar tooth (considered to be the earliest human—Homo erectus/Homo ergaster—traces discovered in Europe outside Caucasian region), lower palaeolithic assemblages that belong to a core-and-flake non-Acheulian industry, and incised bones that may be the earliest example of human symbolic behaviour. 43°39′N 22°42′E / 43.650°N 22.700°E / 43.650; 22.700
Orce Man tooth and tools 1.4 Mio Venta Micena most finds are stone tools 37°43′N 2°28′W / 37.717°N 2.467°W / 37.717; -2.467
Pleistocene mandible Homo antecessor 1.3 Mio Atapuerca Mountains 42°22′N 3°30′W / 42.367°N 3.500°W / 42.367; -3.500
Mauer 1 Homo heidelbergensis 600,000 Mauer earliest Homo heidelbergensis 49°20′N 8°47′E / 49.333°N 8.783°E / 49.333; 8.783
Boxgrove Man Homo heidelbergensis 500,000 Boxgrove 50°51′N 0°42′W / 50.850°N 0.700°W / 50.850; -0.700
Tautavel Man Homo erectus 450,000 Tautavel proposed subspecies 42°48′N 2°45′E / 42.800°N 2.750°E / 42.800; 2.750
Swanscombe Man Homo heidelbergensis 400,000 Swanscombe north-western habitat maximum 51°26′N 0°17′E / 51.433°N 0.283°E / 51.433; 0.283
Schöningen Spears wooden javelins 380,000 Schoningen 1995 active hunt 42°48′N 2°45′E / 42.800°N 2.750°E / 42.800; 2.750

Lower and Middle Paleolithic human presence

Acheulean hand axes and hand axe-like implements, flint, 800,000–300,000 BC

The climatic record of the Paleolithic is characterised by the Pleistocene pattern of cyclic warmer and colder periods, including eight major cycles and numerous shorter episodes. The northern maximum of human occupation fluctuated in response to the changing conditions, and successful settlement required constant adaption capabilities and problem solving. Most of Scandinavia, the North European Plain and Russia remained off limits for occupation during the Paleolithic and Mesolithic. Populations were low in density and small in number throughout the Palaeolithic.

Associated evidence, such as stone tools, artifacts and settlement localities, is more numerous than fossilised remains of the hominin occupants themselves. The simplest pebble tools with a few flakes struck off to create an edge were found in Dmanisi, Georgia, and in Spain at sites in the Guadix-Baza basin and near Atapuerca. The Oldowan tool discoveries, called Mode 1-type assemblages are gradually replaced by a more complex tradition that included a range of hand axes and flake tools, the Acheulean, Mode 2-type assemblages. Both types of tool sets are attributed to Homo erectus, the earliest and for a very long time the only human in Europe and more likely to be found in the southern part of the continent. However, the Acheulean fossil record also links to the emergence of Homo heidelbergensis, particularly its specific lithic tools and handaxes. The presence of Homo heidelbergensis is documented since 600,000 BC in numerous sites in Germany, Great Britain and northern France.

Although palaeoanthropologists generally agree that Homo erectus and Homo heidelbergensis immigrated to Europe, debates remain about migration routes and the chronology.

The fact that Homo neanderthalensis is found only in a contiguous range in Eurasia and the general acceptance of the Out of Africa hypothesis both suggest that the species has evolved locally. Again, consensus prevails on the matter, but widely debated are origin and evolution patterns. The Neanderthal fossil record ranges from Western Europe to the Altai Mountains in Central Asia and the Ural Mountains in the North to the Levant in the South. Unlike its predecessors, they were biologically and culturally adapted to survival in cold environments and successfully extended their range to the glacial environments of Central Europe and the Russian plains. The great number and, in some cases, exceptional state of preservation of Neanderthal fossils and cultural assemblages enables researchers to provide a detailed and accurate data on behaviour and culture. Neanderthals are associated with the Mousterian culture (Mode 3), stone tools that first appeared approximately 160,000 years ago.

Upper Paleolithic

Main articles: European early modern humans and Paleolithic Europe

Homo sapiens arrived in Europe around 46,000 and 43,000 years ago via the Levant and entered the continent through the Danubian corridor, as the fossils at the sites of Bacho Kiro cave and Peștera cu Oase suggest. With an approximate age of 46,000 years, the Homo sapiens fossils found in Bacho Kiro cave consist of a pair of fragmented mandibles including at least one molar This site yielded the oldest known ornaments in Europe, Radiocarbon dated to over 43,000 years ago.

The fossils' genetic structure indicates a recent Neanderthal ancestry and the discovery of a fragment of a skull in Israel in 2008 support the notion that humans interbred with Neanderthals in the Levant.

After the slow processes of the previous hundreds of thousands of years, a turbulent period of Neanderthal–Homo sapiens coexistence demonstrated that cultural evolution had replaced biological evolution as the primary force of adaptation and change in human societies.

Generally small and widely dispersed fossil sites suggest that Neanderthals lived in less numerous and more socially isolated groups than Homo sapiens. Tools and Levallois points are remarkably sophisticated from the outset, but they have a slow rate of variability, and general technological inertia is noticeable during the entire fossil period. Artifacts are of utilitarian nature, and symbolic behavioral traits are undocumented before the arrival of modern humans. The Aurignacian culture, introduced by modern humans, is characterized by cut bone or antler points, fine flint blades and bladelets struck from prepared cores, rather than using crude flakes. The oldest examples and subsequent widespread tradition of prehistoric art originate from the Aurignacian.

After more than 100,000 years of uniformity, around 45,000 years ago, the Neanderthal fossil record changed abruptly. The Mousterian had quickly become more versatile and was named the Chatelperronian culture, which signifies the diffusion of Aurignacian elements into Neanderthal culture. Although debated, the fact proved that Neanderthals had, to some extent, adopted the culture of modern Homo sapiens. However, the Neanderthal fossil record completely vanished after 40,000 years BC. Whether Neanderthals were also successful in diffusing their genetic heritage into Europe's future population or they simply went extinct and, if so, what caused the extinction cannot conclusively be answered.

Lascaux cave painting, Magdalenian, 15,000 BC

Around 32,000 years ago, the Gravettian culture appeared in the Crimean Mountains (southern Ukraine). By 24,000 BC, the Solutrean and Gravettian cultures were present in Southwestern Europe. Gravettian technology and culture have been theorised to have come with migrations of people from the Middle East, Anatolia and the Balkans, and might be linked with the transitional cultures mentioned earlier since their techniques have some similarities and are both very different from Aurignacian ones, but this issue is very obscure. The Gravettian also appeared in the Caucasus and Zagros Mountains but soon disappeared from southwestern Europe, with the notable exception of the Mediterranean coasts of Iberia.

The Solutrean culture, extended from northern Spain to southeastern France, includes not only a stone technology but also the first significant development of cave painting and the use of the needle and possibly that of the bow and arrow. The more widespread Gravettian culture is no less advanced, at least in artistic terms: sculpture (mainly venuses) is the most outstanding form of creative expression of such peoples.

Around 19,000 BC, Europe witnesses the appearance of a new culture, known as Magdalenian, possibly rooted in the old Aurignacian one, which soon superseded the Solutrean area and also the Gravettian of Central Europe. However, in Mediterranean Iberia, Italy, the Balkans and Anatolia, epi-Gravettian cultures continued to evolve locally.

With the Magdalenian culture, the Paleolithic development in Europe reaches its peak and this is reflected in art, owing to previous traditions of paintings and sculpture.

Around 12,500 BC, the Würm Glacial Age ended. Slowly, through the following millennia, temperatures and sea levels rose, changing the environment of prehistoric people. Ireland and Great Britain became islands, and Scandinavia became separated from the main part of the European Peninsula. (They had all once been connected by a now-submerged region of the continental shelf known as Doggerland.) Nevertheless, the Magdalenian culture persisted until 10,000 BC, when it quickly evolved into two microlith cultures: Azilian, in Spain and southern France, and Sauveterrian, in northern France and Central Europe. Despite some differences, both cultures shared several traits: the creation of very small stone tools called microliths and the scarcity of figurative art, which seems to have vanished almost completely, which was replaced by abstract decoration of tools.

In the late phase of the epi-Paleolithic period, the Sauveterrean culture evolved into the so-called Tardenoisian and strongly influenced its southern neighbour, clearly replacing it in Mediterranean Spain and Portugal. The recession of the glaciers allowed human colonisation in Northern Europe for the first time. The Maglemosian culture, derived from the Sauveterre-Tardenois culture but with a strong personality, colonised Denmark and the nearby regions, including parts of Britain.

Mesolithic (Middle Stone Age)

Main article: Mesolithic Europe Further information: Balkan Mesolithic, British Mesolithic, Irish Mesolithic, Azilian, Fosna–Hensbacka culture, and Kunda culture
Thaïs bone, France, Azilian culture, c. 10,000 BC.

A transition period in the development of human technology between the Paleolithic and the Neolithic, the Balkan Mesolithic began around 15,000 years ago. In Western Europe, the Early Mesolithic, or Azilian, began about 14,000 years ago, in the Franco-Cantabrian region of northern Spain and southern France. In other parts of Europe, the Mesolithic began by 11,500 years ago (the beginning Holocene) and ended with the introduction of farming, which, depending on the region, occurred 8,500 to 5,500 years ago.

In areas with limited glacial impact, the term "Epipaleolithic" is sometimes preferred for the period. Regions that experienced greater environmental effects as the Last Glacial Period ended had a much more apparent Mesolithic era that lasted millennia. In Northern Europe, societies were able to live well on rich food supplies from the marshlands, which had been created by the warmer climate. Such conditions produced distinctive human behaviours that are preserved in the material record, such as the Maglemosian and Azilian cultures. Such conditions delayed the coming of the Neolithic to as late as 5,500 years ago in Northern Europe.

As what Vere Gordon Childe termed the "Neolithic Package" (including agriculture, herding, polished stone axes, timber longhouses and pottery) spread into Europe, the Mesolithic way of life was marginalised and eventually disappeared. Controversy over the means of that dispersal is discussed below in the Neolithic section. A "Ceramic Mesolithic" can be distinguished between 7,200 and 5,850 years ago and ranged from Southern to Northern Europe.

Neolithic (New Stone Age)

Main article: Neolithic Europe Further information: Old Europe (archaeology)
Chronology of agriculture introduction in Europe

The European Neolithic is assumed to have arrived from the Near East via Asia Minor, the Mediterranean and the Caucasus. There has been a long discussion between migrationists, who claim that the Near Eastern farmers almost totally displaced the European native hunter-gatherers, and diffusionists, who claim that the process was slow enough to have occurred mostly through cultural transmission. A relationship has been suggested between the spread of agriculture and the diffusion of Indo-European languages, with several models of migrations trying to establish a relationship, like the Anatolian hypothesis, which sets the origin of Indo-European agricultural terminology in Anatolia.

Early Neolithic

Apparently related with the Anatolian culture of Hacilar, the Greek region of Thessaly was the first place in Europe known to have acquired agriculture, cattle-herding and pottery. The early stages are known as pre-Sesklo culture. The Thessalian Neolithic culture soon evolved into the more coherent Sesklo culture (6000 BC), which was the origin of the main branches of Neolithic expansion in Europe. The Karanovo culture on the territory of modern day Bulgaria, was another early Neolithic culture (Karanovo I-III ca. 62nd to 55th centuries BC) which was part of the Danube civilization and it is considered the largest and most important of the Azmak River Valley agrarian settlements. The Karanovo I is considered a continuation of Near Eastern settlement type. The Starčevo culture is dating to the period between c. 6200 and 4500 BCE. It originates in the spread of the Neolithic package of peoples and technological innovations including farming and ceramics from Anatolia. The Starčevo culture marks its spread to the inland Balkan peninsula as the Cardial ware culture did along the Adriatic coastline. It forms part of the wider Starčevo–Körös–Criş culture. Practically all of the Balkan Peninsula was colonized in the 6th millennium from there. The expansion, reaching the easternmost Tardenoisian outposts of the upper Tisza, gave birth to the Proto-Linear Pottery culture, a significant modification of the Balkan Neolithic that was the origin of one of the most important branches of European Neolithic: the Danubian group of cultures. In parallel, the coasts of the Adriatic and of southern Italy witnessed the expansion of another Neolithic current with less clear origins. Settling initially in Dalmatia, the bearers of the Cardium pottery culture may have come from Thessaly (some of the pre-Sesklo settlements show related traits) or even from Lebanon (Byblos). They were sailors, fishermen and sheep and goat herders, and the archaeological findings show that they mixed with natives in most places. Other early Neolithic cultures can be found in Ukraine and Southern Russia, where the epi-Gravettian locals assimilated cultural influxes from beyond the Caucasus (e.g. the Dniepr-Donets culture and related cultures) and in Andalusia (Spain), where the rare Neolithic of La Almagra Pottery appeared without known origins very early (c. 7800 BC).

Middle Neolithic

Main article: Middle Neolithic

This phase, starting 7000 years ago was marked by the consolidation of the Neolithic expansion towards western and northern Europe but also by the rise of new cultures in the Balkans, notably the Dimini (Thessaly) and related Vinca (Serbia and Romania) and Karanovo cultures (Bulgaria and nearby areas). Meanwhile, the Proto-Linear Pottery culture gave birth to two very dynamic branches: the Western and Eastern Linear Pottery Cultures. The western branch expanded quickly, assimilating Germany, the Czech Republic, Poland and even large parts of western Ukraine, historical Moldavia, the lowlands of Romania, and regions of France, Belgium and the Netherlands, all in less than 1000 years. With this expansion came diversification and a number of local Danubian cultures started forming at the end of the 5th millennium. In the Mediterranean, the Cardium pottery fishermen showed no less dynamism and colonised or assimilated all of Italy and the Mediterranean regions of France and Spain. Even in the Atlantic, some groups among the native hunter-gatherers started the slow incorporation of the new technologies. Among them, the most noticeable regions seem to be southwestern Iberia, which was influenced by the Mediterranean but especially by the Andalusian Neolithic, which soon developed the first Megalithic burials (dolmens), and the area around Denmark (Ertebölle culture), influenced by the Danubian complex.

Late Neolithic

This period occupied the first half of the 6th millennium BC. The tendencies of the previous period consolidated and so there was a fully-formed Neolithic Europe, with five main cultural regions:

  1. Danubian culture: from northern France to western Ukraine. Now split into several local cultures, the most relevant being the (Boian culture), the Rössen culture that was pre-eminent in the west, and the Lengyel culture of Austria and western Hungary, which would have a major role in later periods.
    1. The area of Dimini-Vinca: Thessaly, Macedonia and Serbia but extending its influence to parts of the mid-Danubian basin (Tisza, Slavonia) and southern Italy.
  2. Mediterranean cultures: from the Adriatic to eastern Spain, including Italy and large portions of France and Switzerland. They were also diversified into several groups.
  3. Eastern Europe: basically central and eastern Ukraine and parts of southern Russia and Belarus (Dniepr-Don culture). This area has the earliest evidence for domesticated horses.
  4. Atlantic Europe: a mosaic of local cultures, some of them still pre-Neolithic, from Portugal to southern Sweden. In around 5800 BC, western France began to incorporate the Megalithic style of burial.

Chalcolithic (Copper Age)

Main article: Chalcolithic Europe Further information: Old Europe (archaeology)
Varna culture elite burial, Bulgaria, 4500 BC

Also known as "Copper Age", the European Chalcolithic was a time of significant changes, the first of which was the invention of copper metallurgy. This is first attested in the Vinca culture in the 6th millennium BC. The Balkans became a major centre for copper extraction and metallurgical production in the 5th millennium BC. Copper artefacts were traded across the region, eventually reaching eastwards across the steppes of eastern Europe as far as the Khavalynsk culture. The 5th millennium BC also saw the appearance of economic stratification and the rise of ruling elites in the Balkan region, most notably in the Varna culture (c. 4500 BC) in Bulgaria, which developed the first known gold metallurgy in the world.

The economy of the Chalcolithic was no longer that of peasant communities and tribes, since some materials began to be produced in specific locations and distributed to wide regions. Mining of metal and stone was particularly developed in some areas, along with the processing of those materials into valuable goods.

Early Chalcolithic, 5500-4000 BC

From 5500 BC onwards, Eastern Europe was apparently infiltrated by people originating from beyond the Volga, creating a plural complex known as Sredny Stog culture, which substituted the previous Dnieper-Donets culture in Ukraine, pushing the natives to migrate northwest to the Baltic and to Denmark, where they mixed with the natives (TRBK A and C). The emergence of the Sredny Stog culture may be correlated with the expansion of Indo-European languages, according to the Kurgan hypothesis. Near the end of the period, around 4000 BC, another westward migration of supposed Indo-European speakers left many traces in the lower Danube area (culture of Cernavodă I) in what seems to have been an invasion.

Solnitsata ("The Saltworks"), a prehistoric town located in present-day Bulgaria, is believed by archaeologists to be the oldest town in Europe - a fortified stone settlement - citadelle, inner and outer city with pottery production site and the site of a salt production facility approximately six millennia ago; it flourished ca 4700–4200 BC.

Meanwhile, the Danubian Lengyel culture absorbed its northern neighbours in the Czech Republic and Poland for some centuries, only to recede in the second half of the period. The hierarchical model of the Varna culture seems to have been replicated later in the Tiszan region with the Bodrogkeresztur culture. Labour specialisation, economic stratification and possibly the risk of invasion may have been the reasons behind this development.

In the western Danubian region (the Rhine and Seine basins), the Michelsberg culture displaced its predecessor, the Rössen culture. Meanwhile, in the Mediterranean basin, several cultures (most notably the Chasséen culture in southeastern France and the Lagozza culture in northern Italy) converged into a functional union of which the most significant characteristic was the distribution network of honey-coloured silex. Despite the unity, the signs of conflicts are clear, as many skeletons show violent injuries. This was the time and area of Ötzi, the famous man found in the Alps.

Middle Chalcolithic, 4000-3000 BC
Cucuteni figurine, Romania, 4000 BC

This period extends through the first half of the 4th millennium BC. During this period the Cucuteni-Trypillia culture in Ukraine experienced a massive expansion, building the largest settlements in the world at the time, described as the first cities in the world by some scholars. The earliest known evidence for wheeled vehicles, in the form of wheeled models, also comes from Cucuteni-Trypillia sites, dated to c. 3900 BC.

In the Danubian region the powerful Baden culture emerged circa 3500 BC, extending more or less across the region of Austria-Hungary. The rest of the Balkans was profoundly restructured after the invasions of the previous period, with the Coțofeni culture in the central Balkans showing pronounced eastern (or presumably Indo-European) traits. The new Ezero culture in Bulgaria (3300 BC), shows the first evidence of pseudo-bronze (or arsenical bronze), as does the Baden culture and the Cycladic culture (in the Aegean) after 2800 BC.

In Eastern Europe, the Yamnaya culture took over southern Russia and Ukraine. In western Europe, the only sign of unity came from the Megalithic super-culture, which extended from southern Sweden to southern Spain, including large parts of southern Germany as well. However, the Mediterranean and Danubian groupings of the previous period appear to have fragmented into many smaller pieces, some of them apparently backward in technological matters. From 2800 BC, the Danubian Seine-Oise-Marne culture pushed directly or indirectly southwards and destroyed most of the rich Megalithic culture of western France. After 2600 BC, several phenomena prefigured the changes of the upcoming period:

Large towns with stone walls appeared in two different areas of the Iberian Peninsula: one in the Portuguese region of Estremadura (culture of Vila Nova de Sao Pedro), strongly embedded in the Atlantic Megalithic culture; the other near Almería (southeastern Spain), centred around the large town of Los Millares, of Mediterranean character, probably affected by eastern cultural influxes (tholoi). Despite the many differences, both civilisations seem to have had friendly contact and to productive exchanges. In the area of Dordogne (Aquitaine, France), a new unexpected culture of bowmen appears: the Artenac culture soon takes control of western and even northern France and Belgium. In Poland and nearby regions, the putative Indo-Europeans reorganised and reconsolidated with the culture of the Globular Amphoras. Nevertheless, the influence of many centuries in direct contact with the still-powerful Danubian peoples had greatly modified their culture.

Bronze Age

Main article: Bronze Age Europe
Cycladic culture marble figurine, 2700 BC

Use of Bronze begins in the Aegean around 3200 BC. From 2500 BC the new Catacomb culture, whose origins were obscure but were also Indo-Europeans, displaced the Yamna peoples in the regions north and east of the Black Sea, confining them to their original area east of the Volga. Around 2400 BC, the Corded Ware culture replaced their predecessors and expanded to Danubian and Nordic areas of western Germany. One related branch invaded Denmark and southern Sweden (Scandinavian Single Grave culture), and the mid-Danubian basin, though showing more continuity, had clear traits of new Indo-European elites (Vučedol culture). Simultaneously, in the West, the Artenac peoples reached Belgium. With the partial exception of Vučedol, the Danubian cultures, which had been so buoyant just a few centuries ago, were wiped off the map of Europe. The rest of the period was the story of a mysterious phenomenon: the Beaker people, which seemed to be of a mercantile character and to have preferred being buried according to a very specific, almost invariable, ritual. Nevertheless, out of their original area of western Central Europe, they appeared only within local cultures and so they never invaded and assimilated but went to live among those peoples and kept their way of life, which is why they are believed to be merchants.

The rest of Europe remained mostly unchanged and apparently peaceful. In 2300 BC, the first Beaker Pottery appeared in Bohemia and expanded in many directions but particularly westward, along the Rhone and the seas, reaching the culture of Vila Nova (Portugal) and Catalonia (Spain) as their limits. Simultaneously but unrelatedly, in 2200 BC in the Aegean region, the Cycladic culture decayed and was substituted by the new palatine phase of the Minoan culture of Crete.

The second phase of Beaker Pottery, from 2100 BC onwards, is marked by the displacement of the centre of the phenomenon to Portugal, within the culture of Vila Nova. The new centre's influence reached to all of southern and western France but was absent in southern and western Iberia, with the notable exception of Los Millares. After 1900 BC, the centre of the Beaker Pottery returned to Bohemia, and in Iberia, a decentralisation of the phenomenon occurred, with centres in Portugal but also in Los Millares and Ciempozuelos.

Nebra sky disk, Germany, 1800 BC

Though the use of bronze started much earlier in the Aegean area (c. 3.200 BC), c. 2300 BC can be considered typical for the start of the Bronze Age in Europe in general.

  • c. 2300 BC, the Central European cultures of Unetice, Adlerberg, Straubing and pre-Lausitz started working bronze, a technique that reached them through the Balkans and Danube.
  • c. 1800 BC, the culture of Los Millares, in Southwestern Spain, was substituted by that of El Argar, fully of the Bronze Age, which may well have been a centralised state.
  • c. 1700 BC is considered a reasonable date to place the start of Mycenaean Greece, after centuries of infiltration of Indo-European Greeks of an unknown origin.
  • c. 1600 BC, most of these Central European cultures were unified in the powerful Tumulus culture. Simultaneously but unrelatedly, the culture of El Argar started Phase B, which was characterised by a detectable Aegean influence (pithoi burials). About then, it is believed that Minoan Crete fell under the rule of the Mycenaean Greeks.
  • Around 1300 BC, the Indo-European cultures of Central Europe, such as Celts, Italics and certainly Illyrians, changed the cultural phase conforming to the expansionist Urnfield culture, starting a quick expansion that brought them to occupy most of the Balkans, Asia Minor, where they destroyed the Hittite Empire (conquering the secret of iron smelting), northeastern Italy, parts of France, Belgium, the Netherlands, northeastern Spain and southwestern England.

Derivations of the sudden expansion were the Sea Peoples, who attacked Egypt unsuccessfully for some time, including the Philistines (Pelasgians?) and the Dorians, most likely Hellenised members of the group that ended invading Greek itself and destroying the might of Mycene and later Troy.

Simultaneously, around then, the culture of Vila Nova de Sao Pedro, which lasted 1300 years in its urban form, vanishes into a less spectacular one but finally with bronze. The centre of gravity of the Atlantic cultures (the Atlantic Bronze Age complex) was now displaced towards Great Britain. Also about then, the Villanovan culture, the possible precursor of the Etruscan civilisation, appeared in central Italy, possibly with an Aegean origin.

Iron Age

Main article: Iron Age Europe Further information: Hallstatt culture, La Tène culture, and Archaeology of Northern Europe

Though the use of iron was known to the Aegean peoples about 1100 BC, it failed to reach Central Europe before 800 BC, when it gave way to the Hallstatt culture, an Iron Age evolution of the Urnfield culture. Around then, the Phoenicians, benefitting from the disappearance of the Greek maritime power (Greek Dark Ages) founded their first colony at the entrance of the Atlantic Ocean, in Gadir (modern Cádiz), most likely as a merchant outpost to convey the many mineral resources of Iberia and the British Isles.

Nevertheless, from the 7th century BC onwards, the Greeks recovered their power and started their own colonial expansion, founding Massalia (modern Marseilles) and the Iberian outpost of Emporion (modern Empúries). That occurred only after the Iberians could reconquer Catalonia and the Ebro valley from the Celts, separating physically the Iberian Celts from their continental neighbours.

The second phase of the European Iron Age was defined particularly by the Celtic La Tène culture, which started around 400 BC, followed by a large expansion of them into the Balkans, the British Isles, where they assimilated druidism, and other regions of France and Italy.

The decline of Celtic power under the expansive pressure of Germanic tribes (originally from Scandinavia and Lower Germany) and the forming of the Roman Empire during the 1st century BC was also that of the end of prehistory, properly speaking; though many regions of Europe remained illiterate and therefore out of reach of written history for many centuries, the boundary must be placed somewhere, and that date, near the start of the calendar, seems to be quite convenient. The remaining is regional prehistory, or, in most cases, protohistory, but no longer European prehistory, as a whole.

Genetic history

Main article: Genetic history of Europe
Indo-European migrations spread Yamnaya Steppe pastoralist ancestry and Indo-European languages across large parts of Eurasia.

The genetic history of Europe has been inferred by observing the patterns of genetic diversity across the continent and in the surrounding areas. Use has been made of both classical genetics and molecular genetics. Analysis of the DNA of the modern population of Europe has mainly been used but use has also been made of ancient DNA.

This analysis has shown that modern man entered Europe from the Near East before the Last Glacial Maximum but retreated to refuges in southern Europe in this cold period. Subsequently, people spread out over the whole continent, with subsequent limited migration from the Near East and Asia.

According to a study in 2017, the early farmers belonged predominantly to the paternal Haplogroup G-M201. The maternal haplogroup N1a was also frequent in the farmers.

Evidence from genome analysis of ancient human remains suggests that the modern native populations of Europe largely descend from three distinct lineages: Mesolithic hunter-gatherers, derivative of the Cro-Magnon population of Europe, Early European Farmers (EEF) introduced to Europe during the Neolithic Revolution, and Ancient North Eurasians which expanded to Europe in the context of the Indo-European expansion. The Early European Farmers migrated from Anatolia to the Balkans in large numbers during the 7th millennium BC. During the Chalcolithic and early Bronze Age, the EEF-derived cultures of Europe were overwhelmed by successive invasions of Western Steppe Herders (WSHs) from the Pontic–Caspian steppe, who carried about 60% Eastern Hunter-Gatherer (EHG) and 40% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer (CHG) admixture. These invasions led to EEF paternal DNA lineages in Europe being almost entirely replaced with EHG/WSH paternal DNA (mainly R1b and R1a). EEF maternal DNA (mainly haplogroup N) also declined, being supplanted by steppe lineages, suggesting the migrations involved both males and females from the steppe. EEF mtDNA, however, remained frequent, suggesting admixture between WSH males and EEF females.

Linguistic history

Main articles: Paleo-European languages and Pre-Indo-European languages

The written linguistic record in Europe first begins with the Mycenaean record of early Greek in the Late Bronze Age. Unattested languages spoken in Europe in the Bronze and Iron Ages are the object of reconstruction in historical linguistics, in the case of Europe predominantly Indo-European linguistics.

Indo-European is assumed to have spread from the Pontic steppe at the very beginning of the Bronze Age, reaching Western Europe contemporary with the Beaker culture, after about 5,000 years ago.

Various pre-Indo-European substrates have been postulated, but remain speculative; the "Pelasgian" and "Tyrsenian" substrates of the Mediterranean world, an "Old European" (which may itself have been an early form of Indo-European), a "Vasconic" substrate ancestral to the modern Basque language, or a more widespread presence of early Finno-Ugric languages in northern Europe. An early presence of Indo-European throughout Europe has also been suggested ("Paleolithic continuity theory").

Donald Ringe emphasizes the "great linguistic diversity" which would generally have been predominant in any area inhabited by small-scale, tribal pre-state societies.

See also

References

  1. "Oldest Human Fossil in Western Europe Found in Spain". Popular-archaeology. Retrieved December 28, 2016.
  2. Carbonell, Eudald; et al. (27 March 2008). "The first hominin of Europe" (PDF). Nature. 452 (7186): 465–469. Bibcode:2008Natur.452..465C. doi:10.1038/nature06815. hdl:2027.42/62855. PMID 18368116. S2CID 4401629.
  3. "Prehistory – definition of prehistory in English". oxford dictionaries. Archived from the original on September 25, 2016. Retrieved December 28, 2016.
  4. "Ancient Scripts: Linear A". Ancientscripts.com. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  5. "Herodotus – Ancient History". History com. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  6. "Archaeological Site of Atapuerca". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved December 28, 2016.
  7. "Fossils Reveal Clues on Human Ancestor". The New York Times. 20 September 2007.
  8. Bischoff, James L.; Shamp, Donald D.; Aramburu, Arantza; Arsuaga, Juan Luis; Carbonell, Eudald; Bermudez de Castro, J.M. (2003). "The Sima de los Huesos Hominids Date to Beyond U/Th Equilibrium (>350kyr) and Perhaps to 400–500kyr: New Radiometric Dates". Journal of Archaeological Science. 30 (3): 275–80. Bibcode:2003JArSc..30..275B. doi:10.1006/jasc.2002.0834.
  9. ^ "Neanderthal Anthropology". Encyclopædia Britannica. January 29, 2015. Retrieved September 26, 2016. ...Neanderthals inhabited Eurasia from the Atlantic regions…
  10. "Neanderthals' Last Stand Is Traced". The New York Times. September 13, 2006. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
  11. "Fossil Teeth Put Humans in Europe Earlier Than Thought". The New York Times. 2 November 2011.
  12. "DNA Deciphers Roots of Modern Europeans". The New York Times. June 10, 2015. Retrieved December 28, 2016.
  13. Rusu, Aurelian I. (January 2011). "Lepenski Vir – Schela Cladovei culture's chronology and its interpretation". Brukenthal. Acta Musei. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  14. "Archaeological Exhibitions". Duncancaldwell. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  15. "Serbian site may have hosted first copper makers". UCL Institute of Archaeology. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  16. "Early metallurgy: copper smelting, Belovode, Serbia: Vinča culture". quantumfuturegroup.org. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  17. "The oldest Copper Metallurgy in the Balkans" (PDF). Penn Museum. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  18. "HISTORY OF METALLURGY". HistoryWorld.net. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  19. Gilman, Antonio; Cazzella, Alberto; Cowgill, George L.; Crumley, Carole L.; Earle, Timothy; Gallay, Alain; Harding, A. F.; Harrison, R. J.; Hicks, Ronald; Kohl, Philip L.; Lewthwaite, James; Schwartz, Charles A.; Shennan, Stephen J.; Sherratt, Andrew; Tosi, Maurizio; Wells, Peter S. (1981). "The Development of Social Stratification in Bronze Age Europe (and Comments and Reply)". Current Anthropology. 22 (1). Academia.edu: 1–23. doi:10.1086/202600. S2CID 145631324. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  20. "The Hittites: Civilization, History & Definition" (Video & Lesson Transcript). Study.com. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  21. Slomp, Hans (2011). Europe, A Political Profile: An American companion to European politics. ABC-CLIO. p. 50. ISBN 978-0313391811.
  22. "Lithic Assemblage Dated to 1.57 Million Years Found at Lézignan-la-Cébe, Southern France". Anthropology.net. 2009-12-17. Retrieved December 30, 2016.
  23. ""Kozarnika" cave". VDCCI BG. Archived from the original on September 15, 2016. Retrieved September 5, 2016.
  24. "Early human marks are "symbols"". BBC News. March 16, 2004. Retrieved September 5, 2016.
  25. "Creationist Arguments: Orce Man". Talkorigins. Retrieved December 31, 2016.
  26. Bermúdez; de Castro, JM; Martinón-Torres, M; Gómez-Robles, A; Prado-Simón, L; Martín-Francés, L; Lapresa, M; Olejniczak, A; Carbonell, E (2011). "Early Pleistocene human mandible from Sima del Elefante (TE) cave site in Sierra de Atapuerca (Spain): a comparative morphological study". Journal of Human Evolution. 61 (1): 12–25. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.03.005. PMID 21531443.
  27. Arlette P. Kouwenhoven (May–June 1997). "World's Oldest Spears". Archaeology. 50 (3). Retrieved December 30, 2016.
  28. "Paleolithic settlement". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved December 31, 2016.
  29. French, Jennifer (2021). Palaeolithic Europe: A Demographic and Social Prehistory. UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–18. ISBN 9781108710060.
  30. Moncel, Marie-Hélène; Despriée, Jackie; Voinchet, Pierre; Tissoux, Hélène; Moreno, Davinia; Bahain, Jean-Jacques; Courcimault, Gilles; Falguères, Christophe (2013). "Early Evidence of Acheulean Settlement in Northwestern Europe – La Noira Site, a 700,000 Year-Old Occupation in the Center of France". PLOS ONE. 8 (11): e75529. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...875529M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075529. PMC 3835824. PMID 24278105.
  31. "Early Human Evolution: Homo ergaster and erectus". palomar edu. Retrieved December 31, 2016.
  32. Cookson, Clive (June 27, 2014). "Palaeontology: How Neanderthals evolved". Financial Times. Retrieved October 28, 2015.
  33. Callaway, Ewen (19 June 2014). "'Pit of bones' catches Neanderthal evolution in the act". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.15430. S2CID 88427585.
  34. "Oldest Ancient-Human DNA Details Dawn of Neandertals". Scientific American. March 14, 2016. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
  35. "Homo heidelbergensis". Smithsonian Institution. 2010-02-14. Retrieved September 26, 2016. Comparison of Neanderthal and modern human DNA suggests that the two lineages diverged from a common ancestor, most likely Homo heidelbergensis
  36. Edwards, Owen (March 2010). "The Skeletons of Shanidar Cave". Smithsonian. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
  37. Shaw, Ian; Jameson, Robert, eds. (1999). A Dictionary of Archaeology. Blackwell. p. 408. ISBN 978-0-631-17423-3. Retrieved 1 August 2016.
  38. "Homo neanderthalensis". Smithsonian Institution. September 22, 2016. Retrieved September 26, 2016. ...The Mousterian stone tool industry of Neanderthals is characterized by…
  39. Wilford, John Noble (2 Nov 2011). "Fossil Teeth Put Humans in Europe Earlier Than Thought". New York Times. Retrieved 2012-04-19.
  40. Fewlass, Helen; Talamo, Sahra; Wacker, Lukas; Kromer, Bernd; Tuna, Thibaut; Fagault, Yoann; Bard, Edouard; McPherron, Shannon P.; Aldeias, Vera; Maria, Raquel; Martisius, Naomi L.; Paskulin, Lindsay; Rezek, Zeljko; Sinet-Mathiot, Virginie; Sirakova, Svoboda; Smith, Geoffrey M.; Spasov, Rosen; Welker, Frido; Sirakov, Nikolay; Tsanova, Tsenka; Hublin, Jean-Jacques (11 May 2020). "A 14C chronology for the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition at Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 4 (6): 794–801. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1136-3. hdl:11585/770560. PMID 32393865. S2CID 218593433.
  41. Sale, Kirkpatrick (2006). After Eden: The evolution of human domination. Duke University Press. p. 48. ISBN 0822339382. Retrieved 11 November 2011.
  42. Kuhn, Steven L.; Stiner, Mary C.; Reese, David S.; Güleç, Erksin (19 June 2001). "Ornaments of the earliest Upper Paleolithic: New insights from the Levant". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98 (13): 7641–7646. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.7641K. doi:10.1073/pnas.121590798. PMC 34721. PMID 11390976.
  43. Milisauskas, Sarunas (1974). European Prehistory: A Survey. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4419-6633-9. Retrieved June 8, 2012. One of the earliest dates for an Aurignacian assemblage is greater than 43,000 BP from Bacho Kiro cave in Bulgaria ...
  44. "Chapter 5: Hunting & Gathering Societies". Florida International University. Retrieved December 31, 2016.
  45. "Creativity in human evolution and prehistory" (PDF). Arizona University. Retrieved December 31, 2016.
  46. Mellars, P. (2006). "Archeology and the Dispersal of Modern Humans in Europe: Deconstructing the Aurignacian". Evolutionary Anthropology. 15 (5): 167–182. doi:10.1002/evan.20103. S2CID 85316570.
  47. "Homo neanderthalensis Brief Summary". EOL. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
  48. Peresani, M; Dallatorre, S; Astuti, P; Dal Colle, M; Ziggiotti, S; Peretto, C (2014). "Symbolic or utilitarian? Juggling interpretations of Neanderthal behavior: new inferences from the study of engraved stone surfaces". J Anthropol Sci. 92 (92): 233–55. doi:10.4436/JASS.92007 (inactive 1 November 2024). PMID 25020018.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  49. Milisauskas, Sarunas (2011). European Prehistory: A Survey. Springer. p. 74. ISBN 978-1-4419-6633-9. Retrieved 8 June 2012. One of the earliest dates for an Aurignacian assemblage is greater than 43,000 BC from Bacho Kiro cave in Bulgaria ...
  50. "Chatelperronian Transition to Upper Paleolithic". About.com. Retrieved December 31, 2016.
  51. Prat, Sandrine; Péan, Stéphane C.; Crépin, Laurent; Drucker, Dorothée G.; Puaud, Simon J.; Valladas, Hélène; Lázničková-Galetová, Martina; van der Plicht, Johannes; Yanevich, Alexander (17 June 2011). "The Oldest Anatomically Modern Humans from Far Southeast Europe: Direct Dating, Culture and Behavior". PLOS ONE. 6 (6). plosone: e20834. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...620834P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020834. PMC 3117838. PMID 21698105.
  52. Carpenter, Jennifer (20 June 2011). "Early human fossils unearthed in Ukraine". BBC. Retrieved 21 June 2011.
  53. "Mas d'Azil". Logan Museum. Beloit College. Archived from the original on 30 April 2001.
  54. "The Thaïs Bone, France". UNESCO Portal to the Heritage of Astronomy. The engraving on the Thaïs bone is a non-decorative notational system of considerable complexity. The cumulative nature of the markings together with their numerical arrangement and various other characteristics strongly suggest that the notational sequence on the main face represents a non-arithmetical record of day-by-day lunar and solar observations undertaken over a time period of as much as 3½ years. The markings appear to record the changing appearance of the moon, and in particular its crescent phases and times of invisibility, and the shape of the overall pattern suggests that the sequence was kept in step with the seasons by observations of the solstices. The latter implies that people in the Azilian period were not only aware of the changing appearance of the moon but also of the changing position of the sun, and capable of synchronizing the two. The markings on the Thaïs bone represent the most complex and elaborate time-factored sequence currently known within the corpus of Palaeolithic mobile art. The artefact demonstrates the existence, within Upper Palaeolithic (Azilian) cultures c. 12,000 years ago, of a system of time reckoning based upon observations of the phase cycle of the moon, with the inclusion of a seasonal time factor provided by observations of the solar solstices.
  55. Childe 1925
  56. The supposed autochthony of Hittites, the Indo-Hittite hypothesis and the migration of agricultural "Indo-European" societies were intrinsically linked by Colin Renfrew 2001
  57. Danver, Steven L. (2015). Native Peoples of the World: An Encyclopedia of Groups, Cultures and Contemporary Issues. Oxon: Routledge. p. 271. ISBN 9780765682222.
  58. Whittle, Alasdair; Hofmann, Daniela; Bailey, Douglass W. (2008). Living Well Together? Settlement and Materiality in the Neolithic of South-East and Central Europe. Oxbow Books. ISBN 978-1-78297-481-9.
  59. Istorijski atlas, Intersistem Kartografija, Beograd, 2010, page 11.
  60. Chapman 2000, p. 237. sfn error: no target: CITEREFChapman2000 (help)
  61. Grazia Melis, Maria (2011). "Monte d'Accoddi and the end of the Neolithic in Sardinia (Italy)". Documenta Praehistorica. 38: 207–219. doi:10.4312/dp.38.16.
  62. "Ritual and Memory: Neolithic Era and Copper Age". Institute for the Study of the Ancient World. 2022.
  63. "The Copper Age in northern Italy". University of Arizona Libraries. Retrieved December 29, 2017.
  64. Smith, Harvey B. Re-Examining Late Chalcolithic Cultural Collapse in South-East Europe (MA Thesis). University of Arkansas. Retrieved January 1, 2017.
  65. Maugh II, Thomas H. (1 November 2012). "Bulgarians find oldest European town, a salt production center". The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 1 November 2012.
  66. Survival of Information: the earliest prehistoric town in Europe
  67. Squires, Nick (31 October 2012). "Archaeologists find Europe's most prehistoric town". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 1 November 2012.
  68. Nikolov, Vassil. "Salt, early complex society, urbanization: Provadia-Solnitsata (5500-4200 BC) (Abstract)" (PDF). Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Retrieved 1 November 2012.
  69. ^ Haarmann, Harald (1996). Early civilization and literacy in Europe : an inquiry into cultural continuity in the Mediterranean world. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3110146516.
  70. "Alternative Linguiatics – Ethnicity of the Neolithic and Chalcolithic cultures of Eastern Europe". Alterling ucoz de. Retrieved January 1, 2017.
  71. Wells, Peter S.; Geddes, David S. (2017). "Neolithic, Chalcolithic, and Early Bronze in West Mediterranean Europe". American Antiquity. 51 (4): 763. doi:10.2307/280864. JSTOR 280864. S2CID 163672997.
  72. "Steppe migrant thugs pacified by Stone Age farming women". ScienceDaily. Faculty of Science - University of Copenhagen. 4 April 2017.
  73. Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1994
  74. Metspalu et al. 2004
  75. Achilli et al. 2004
  76. Lipson, Mark; Szécsényi-Nagy, Anna; Mallick, Swapan; Pósa, Annamária; Stégmár, Balázs; Keerl, Victoria; Rohland, Nadin; Stewardson, Kristin; Ferry, Matthew (2017-11-16). "Parallel paleogenomic transects reveal complex genetic history of early European farmers". Nature. 551 (7680): 368–372. Bibcode:2017Natur.551..368L. doi:10.1038/nature24476. ISSN 0028-0836. PMC 5973800. PMID 29144465.
  77. Crabtree & Bogucki 2017, p. 55
  78. "When the First Farmers Arrived in Europe, Inequality Evolved". Scientific American. 1 July 2020.
  79. Lipson, Mark; et al. (November 8, 2017). "Parallel palaeogenomic transects reveal complex genetic history of early European farmers". Nature. 551 (7680). Nature Research: 368–372. Bibcode:2017Natur.551..368L. doi:10.1038/nature24476. PMC 5973800. PMID 29144465.
  80. Crabtree, Pam J.; Bogucki, Peter (25 January 2017). European Archaeology as Anthropology: Essays in Memory of Bernard Wailes. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 55. ISBN 978-1-934536-90-2.p.55: "In addition, uniparental markers changed suddenly as mtDNA N1a and Y haplogroup G2a, which had been very common in the EEF agricultural population, were replaced by Y haplogroups R1a and R1b and by a variety of mtDNA haplogroups typical of the Steppe Yamnaya population. The uniparental markers show that the migrants included both men and women from the steppes."
  81. Översti, Sanni; Majander, Kerttu; Salmela, Elina; Salo, Kati; Arppe, Laura; Belskiy, Stanislav; Etu-Sihvola, Heli; Laakso, Ville; Mikkola, Esa; Pfrengle, Saskia; Putkonen, Mikko; Taavitsainen, Jussi-Pekka; Vuoristo, Katja; Wessman, Anna; Sajantila, Antti; Oinonen, Markku; Haak, Wolfgang; Schuenemann, Verena J.; Krause, Johannes; Palo, Jukka U.; Onkamo, Päivi (15 November 2019). "Human mitochondrial DNA lineages in Iron-Age Fennoscandia suggest incipient admixture and eastern introduction of farming-related maternal ancestry". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 16883. Bibcode:2019NatSR...916883O. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51045-8. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 6858343. PMID 31729399. ""The subsequent spread of Yamnaya-related people and Corded Ware Culture in the late Neolithic and Bronze Age were accompanied with the increase of haplogroups I, U2 and T1 in Europe (See8 and references therein)."
  82. Juras, Anna; et al. (August 2, 2018). "Mitochondrial genomes reveal an east to west cline of steppe ancestry in Corded Ware populations". Scientific Reports. 8 (11603). Nature Research: 11603. Bibcode:2018NatSR...811603J. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29914-5. PMC 6072757. PMID 30072694.
  83. Kristian Kristiansen, Morten E. Allentoft, Karin M. Frei, Rune Iversen, Niels N. Johannsen, Guus Kroonen, Łukasz Pospieszny, T. Douglas Price, Simon Rasmussen, Karl-Göran Sjögren, Martin Sikora, Eske Willerslev. Re-theorising mobility and the formation of culture and language among the Corded Ware Culture in Europe. Antiquity, Volume 91, Issue 356, April 2017, pp. 334 - 347.
  84. Vennemann 2003
  85. Wiik 2002.
  86. Adams and Otte 1999
  87. Ringe, Don (January 6, 2009). "The Linguistic Diversity of Aboriginal Europe". Language Log. Mark Liberman. Retrieved 22 September 2011.

Sources

  • Achilli, Alessandro; Rengo, Chaira; Magri, Chiara; Battaglia, Vincenza; Olivieri, Anna; Scozari, Rosaria; Cruciani, Fulvio; Zeviani, Massimo; Briem, Egill; Carelli, Valerio; Moral, Pedro; Dugoujon, Jean-Michel; Roostalu, Urmas; Loogväli, Eva-Liss; Kivisild, Toomas; Bandelt, Hans-Jürgen; Richards, Martin; Villems, Richard; Santachiara-Benerecetti, A. Silvana; Semino, Ornella; Torroni, Antonio (2004). "The Molecular Dissection of mtDNA Haplogroup H Confirms that the Franco-Cantabrian Glacial Refuge was a Major Source for the European Gene Pool". American Journal of Human Genetics. 75 (5): 910–918. doi:10.1086/425590. PMC 1182122. PMID 15382008.
  • Adams, Jonathan; Otte, Marcel (1999). "Did Indo-European Languages Spread Before Farming?". Current Anthropology. 40 (1): 73–77. doi:10.1086/515804. S2CID 143134729.
  • Childe, V. Gordon. 1925. The Dawn of European Civilization. New York: Knopf.
  • Childe V.Gordon. 1950. Prehistoric Migrations in Europe. Oslo: Aschehoug.
  • Cavalli-Sforza L.L., Paolo Menozzi, Alberto Piazza. 1994. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Finnilä, Saara; Lehtonen, Mervi S.; Majamaa, Kari (2001). "Phylogenetic Network for European mtDNA". American Journal of Human Genetics. 68 (6): 1475–1484. doi:10.1086/320591. PMC 1226134. PMID 11349229.
  • Gimbutas, M (1980). "The Kurgan wave migration (c. 3400–3200 B.C.) into Europe and the following transformation of culture". Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 8: 273–315.
  • Macaulay, Vincent; Richards, Martin; Hickey, Eileen; Vega, Emilce; Cruciani, Fulvio; Guida, Valentina; Scozzari, Rosaria; Bonné-Tamir, Batsheva; Sykes, Bryan; Torroni, Antonio (1999). "The Emerging Tree of West Eurasian mtDNAs: A Synthesis of Control-Region Sequences and RFLPs". American Journal of Human Genetics. 64 (1): 232–249. doi:10.1086/302204. PMC 1377722. PMID 9915963.
  • Metspalu, Mait, Toomas Kivisild, Ene Metspalu, Jüri Parik, Georgi Hudjashov, Katrin Kaldma, Piia Serk, Monika Karmin, Doron M Behar, M Thomas P Gilbert, Phillip Endicott, Sarabjit Mastana, Surinder S Papiha, Karl Skorecki, Antonio Torroni and Richard Villems. 2004. "Most of the extant mtDNA boundaries in South and Southwest Asia were likely shaped during the initial settlement of Eurasia by anatomically modern humans." BMC Genetics 5
  • Piccolo, Salvatore. 2013. Ancient Stones: The Prehistoric Dolmens of Sicily. Abingdon (GB): Brazen Head Publishing.
  • Renfrew, Colin. 2001. "The Anatolian origins of Proto-Indo-European and the autochthony of the Hittites." In Greater Anatolia and the Indo-Hittite Language Family, R. Drews ed., pp. 36–63. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.
  • Venemann, Theo. 2003. Europa Vasconica, Europa Semitica. Trends in Linguistic Studies and Monographs No. 138. New York and Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Wiik, Kalevi. 2002. Europpalaisten Juuret. Athens: Juvaskylä

External links

Media related to Prehistory of Europe at Wikimedia Commons

Paleolithic sanctuaries:

Prehistoric Europe
Sovereign states
States with limited
recognition
Prehistoric technology
Tools
Farming
Food processing
Hunting
Projectile points
Systems
Toolmaking
Other tools
Architecture
Ceremonial
Dwellings
Water management
Other architecture
Arts and culture
Material goods
Prehistoric art
Burial
Other cultural
History of Europe
Prehistory
Classical antiquity
Middle Ages
Modern period
See also
Category: