Revision as of 17:36, 29 October 2013 editJBUpdate (talk | contribs)76 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:41, 14 November 2024 edit undoCitation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,406,762 edits Added date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Spinixster | Category:Privately held companies of the United States | #UCB_Category 80/204 | ||
(167 intermediate revisions by 62 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|American law firm}} | |||
{{Infobox law firm | {{Infobox law firm | ||
| name = Jenner & Block LLP | | name = Jenner & Block LLP | ||
| logo = |
| logo = Jenner & Block logo.svg | ||
| headquarters = ]<br>] | | headquarters = ]<br>], ], United States | ||
| num_offices = 6<ref name=offices>{{Dead link|date=October 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, Jenner & Block; retrieved May 11, 2015.</ref> | |||
| num_offices = 4 | |||
| num_attorneys = 434<ref name="AL profile">{{cite web| url= http://www.americanlawyer.com/law-firm-profiles-result?firmname=Jenner+%26+Block+LLP |title= Jenner & Block profile| work=] | access-date=11 May 2015}}</ref> | |||
| num_attorneys = approximately 480 | |||
| num_employees = | | num_employees = | ||
| practice_areas = General practice | | practice_areas = General practice | ||
| key_people = ], Chairman;<ref></ref> |
| key_people = ], Chairman;<ref>{{Dead link|date=October 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, ''Jenner.com''</ref> Katya Jestin and Randall E. Mehrberg, Co-Managing Partners | ||
| revenue = $ |
| revenue = $408M (2014)<ref name="AL profile" /> | ||
| date_founded = 1914 | | date_founded = 1914 | ||
| founder = Jacob Newman, |
| founder = Jacob Newman, Conrad Poppenhusen, and Henry Stern<ref>{{Dead link|date=October 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, ''Jenner.com''</ref> | ||
| company_type = ] | | company_type = ] | ||
| slogan = When it's a matter of importance. | <!-- Infobox does not support the following parameter:| slogan = When it's a matter of importance. --> | ||
| homepage = | | homepage = | ||
| dissolved = <!-- Date/Reason the company dissolved, e.g., merger or bankruptcy --> | | dissolved = <!-- Date/Reason the company dissolved, e.g., merger or bankruptcy --> | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Jenner & Block''' is an American ] with offices in Century City, ], ], ], ], San Francisco, and ]<ref name=offices /> The firm is active in ], ], the public sector, and other legal fields. It has litigated several prominent cases before the ]. As of 2014, it was the 103rd-largest law firm in the US, based on '']'s'' annual ranking of firms by headcount.<ref name="AL profile" /> | |||
], site of Jenner & Block's headquarters in ].]] | |||
], home of Jenner & Block's office in ].]] | |||
], home of Jenner & Block's office in ].]] | |||
] | |||
Founded in 1914, '''Jenner & Block''' is a national law firm of approximately 480 attorneys with offices in Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, and Washington, DC. Jenner & Block is internationally recognized as a litigation powerhouse, achieving significant wins from the trial level through the U.S. Supreme Court, and for producing outstanding results in corporate transactions. Jenner & Block has been recognized as among the most elite law firms in the country; among the top U.S. pro bono firms; and as having prominent appellate, insurance, and content, media and entertainment practices. Its clients range from the top ranks of the Fortune 500, large privately held corporations and financial services institutions to emerging companies, family-run businesses and individuals. | |||
==History == | |||
Jenner & Block has played a role in some of the most consequential business matters in U.S. history. Its antitrust lawsuit of AT&T, on behalf of MCI, sowed the seeds for the eventual break-up of telecommunications monopoly in the 1980s<ref>http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1985-05-23/business/8502010799_1_blair-white-mci-execunet</ref>. In 2007, the firm filed a $1 billion copyright infringement lawsuit on behalf of Viacom against Google, the parent owner of YouTube<ref>http://news.cnet.com/2100-1030_3-6166668.html</ref>. In 2009, firm Chairman Anton Valukas was appointed as the examiner in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, and he hired Jenner & Block to produce the report that captured the findings of a year-long investigation of the bank’s finances<ref>http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/jenners_chair_anton_valukas_to_probe_lehman_bros._as_new_examiner/</ref>. In 2010, the firm oversaw General Motors’s $23.1 billion initial public offering of common stock and Series B mandatory convertible junior preferred stock – the largest U.S. IPO<ref>http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1467858/000119312510192195/ds1.htm</ref>. | |||
The firm was founded in Chicago in 1914 as Newman, Poppenhusen & Stern. In late 1928, a former chief justice of the ], ], joined the firm. Known commonly as "The Judge,"{{to whom|date=August 2016}} Thompson handled several high-profile cases for the firm. ], who served as a former assistant counsel to the ], established Jenner & Block's longstanding relationship representing ] in the 1950s.<ref>, '']'', September 30, 1988; retrieved May 14, 2015.</ref> He later was senior minority counsel on the ] inquiry staff for the ] on the ] during the ],<ref>{{cite news| url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1974/01/25/87596141.pdf| title=Man in the News: G.O.P. Aide in Inquiry| first=William E.| last=Farrel| newspaper=The New York Times |date=January 25, 1974 |page=17}}</ref> but was replaced in July 1974 after advocating for the impeachment of Nixon.<ref name="The New York Times; September 20, 1988">{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Albert E. Jenner, 81, A Watergate Counsel |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/09/20/obituaries/albert-e-jenner-81-a-watergate-counsel.html |work=The New York Times |date=September 20, 1988 |access-date=July 26, 2017}}</ref> | |||
Jenner & Block was one of the first national law firms to establish a ] practice specifically focused on appeals before the ]. A number of lawyers in the Washington office have served as clerks to the US Supreme Court.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150426082005/http://www.chambersandpartners.com/usa/firm/3580/jenner-block |date=2015-04-26 }}, Chambers and Partners; retrieved May 14, 2015.</ref><ref>, Jenner & Block; retrieved May 14, 2015.</ref> This office was once headed by Bruce Ennis, Jr., who argued more than a dozen cases before the Supreme Court, including three cases arising under different provisions of the same law, the landmark ]. The appellate practice was once led by ]. <ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150316043343/http://www.chambersandpartners.com/usa/person/172296/paul-m-smith |date=2015-03-16 }}, Chambers & Partners; retrieved May 14, 2015.</ref> ], who succeeded ] as ] during the ] administration, is a former member of the practice.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306154331/https://www.justice.gov/osg/meet-solicitor-general-0 |date=2016-03-06 }}, US Department of Justice; retrieved May 27, 2014.</ref> | |||
Jenner & Block has also established itself in recording significant victories before the Supreme Court regarding free speech, gay rights, copyright, civil procedure, political asylum and other matters. The firm’s first principal litigator, Edward R. Johnston, set the groundwork in 1925 when he earned a landmark win in an antitrust case against the government (Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association v. U.S.)<ref>https://en.wikisource.org/Maple_Flooring_Mfrs'_Association_v._United_States</ref> that allowed for trade association members to exchange information. | |||
The firm was one of the first large firms in the U.S. to establish a ] program. | |||
==History== | |||
Founded in 1914 as a partnership in Chicago, the firm has undergone several name changes. From the 1920s to the 1950s, the firm was known as Johnston, Thompson, Raymond & Mayer, led by a leading Chicago trial lawyer, Edward R. Johnston, and a former Chief Justice of the ], ]. Their early successes included defending Preston Tucker's company, Tucker Corp., against corporate financing fraud charges. After ] became a name partner in 1955, he helped the firm cement its reputation as a pro bono powerhouse and established Jenner & Block's longstanding relationship representing ]. ] was made a name partner in 1964, changing the name of the firm to Raymond Mayer Jenner & Block. The firm became known as Jenner & Block in 1969. | |||
Since its founding, the firm has had 10 names. The name of the firm was changed to Raymond Mayer Jenner & Block in 1964 after ] became a name partner. In 1969, it was shortened to its present form. | |||
The firm established a national footprint with the creation of an office in Washington, DC, in 1982<ref>http://jenner.com/about/washington</ref>. A New York office was created in 2005<ref>http://jenner.com/about/newyork</ref>, followed by an office in Los Angeles in 2009. The firm previously had a presence in Dallas and Miami. | |||
==Prominent legal work== | |||
Jenner's main offices in Chicago are currently located at 353 North Clark. The main office was located at 330 North Wabash until October 2009<ref>http://jenner.com/about/losangeles</ref>. | |||
The firm has a history of litigating and representation in prominent cases, including several argued before the ]. The firm's 1985 antitrust lawsuit of ], on behalf of ], sowed the seeds for the eventual break-up of telecommunications monopoly in the 1980s.<ref>{{cite news| url= https://www.chicagotribune.com/1985/05/23/mci-att-suit-goes-to-the-jury/| title= MCI-AT&T Suit Goes To The Jury: Firms Billions Of Dollars Apart In Damages| date= 23 May 1985| first= Christine |last= Winter| work= Chicago Tribune | access-date= 18 September 2015}}</ref> | |||
The firm's involvement in civil rights cases spans decades. In the 1960s, the firm represented prominent Chicago cardiologist ] when he was subpoenaed to testify before the ]. The firm sued the Committee, seeking to have its mandate declared unconstitutional. After eight and a half years of litigation in the 1960s and 70s, the government agreed to drop its indictment against Dr. Stamler for contempt of Congress, and the doctor agreed to drop his civil suit against the Committee. In 1975, Congress officially abolished ], by that time known as the Internal Security Committee. | |||
==Prominent Cases/Matters== | |||
In 2009, then firm chairman ] was appointed as the examiner in the ] bankruptcy, and he hired Jenner & Block to produce the report that captured the findings of a year-long investigation of the bank's finances.<ref>{{cite news|author=Dealbook| url= https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/03/11/lehman-directors-did-not-breach-duties-examiner-finds/?_r=1 |title= Court-appointed Lehman examiner unveils report| newspaper=]|date= 11 March 2010| access-date= 11 May 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url= https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703625304575115963009594440 |title= Examiner: 'Lehman Torpedoed Lehman'| first1= Mike |last1=Spector| first2= Susanne |last2= Craig | first3= Peter |last3= Lattman| work= ]| date= 11 March 2010| access-date= 11 May 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url= http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/jenners_chair_anton_valukas_to_probe_lehman_bros._as_new_examiner/| title= Jenner's Chair, Anton Valukas, to Probe Lehman Bros. as New Examiner| date= 20 January 2009|first3= Martha |last3=Neil| website= ]}} | |||
] (ongoing) | |||
</ref> In 2010, the firm oversaw ]' $23.1 billion ] of common stock and Series B mandatory convertible junior preferred stock, the largest US IPO ever at the time.<ref>{{cite web| url= https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1467858/000119312510192195/ds1.htm| date=18 August 2010| publisher= Securities and Exchange Commission |location= Washington, D.C.| title= Form S-1: Registration Statement under The Securities Act of 1933: General Motors Company| access-date= 18 September 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url= https://money.cnn.com/2010/11/17/news/companies/gm_ipo_pricing/ |title= GM IPO biggest ever| first= Chris |last= Isidore| publisher= CNN Money| date= 18 November 2010| access-date= 11 May 2015}}</ref> | |||
Jenner & Block represents Viacom in its $1 billion lawsuit against YouTube and Google for “massive intentional copyright infringement” of Viacom’s entertainment properties on the YouTube website. In 2012, the firm won an important victory for Viacom and the content industry when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants and remanded the case for further proceedings. That decision set a significant precedent interpreting the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s “safe harbors” and establishing the legal standard for copyright protection on websites like YouTube that depend upon user uploaded content to attract viewers and advertising revenue. In April, 2012, Partner Paul Smith was recognized by the American Lawyer as “Litigator of the Week” for leading his team to that appellate victory. On remand, the District Court again granted summary judgment for YouTube . The case is back in the Second Circuit with arguments expected in early 2014. Called a “landmark legal battle” (Financial Times), the case is largely viewed as one of the most significant copyright cases of our time, debating the use of copyrighted videos on Google's YouTube service without permission. | |||
The firm has achieved several victories before the US Supreme Court regarding ], gay rights, ], civil procedure, ] and other matters.{{citation needed|date= September 2015}} The firm's first principal litigator, Edward R. Johnston, earned the firm's first Supreme Court victory, a landmark antitrust case against the US government ('']'') that allowed for trade association members to exchange information.<ref>{{cite web| url= https://www.chicagotribune.com/1985/01/22/jenner-blocks-howe-the-pro-of-professional-societies/ |title= Jenner & Block's Howe the pro of professional societies| first1= James |last1=Warren| first2=Maurice |last2= Possley |first3=Joseph | last3=Tybor| work=Chicago Tribune| date=22 January 1985| access-date= 8 June 2015}}</ref> | |||
''Fox Television Stations et. al v FilmOnX LLC ''(2013) | |||
The firm represented plaintiff Stephen Law in ''Law v. Siegel'' in the US Supreme Court in 2014; it had already been representing the plaintiff Law (who had earlier represented himself) in the US Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit). The Supreme Court overturned a California court's decision to allow Law's home equity to be used as payment for legal fees to a trustee, even though the equity was protected by the state's homestead exemption.<ref name= slightly /> | |||
The firm won a significant victory for client Fox TV and the entire broadcast industry in one of a series of copyright infringement cases that threaten the current over-the-air broadcasting business model. In September 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a preliminary injunction in favor of Fox and other networks against online television streaming service FilmOn X LLC, prohibiting it from retransmitting the broadcasters’ copyrighted programs over the Internet. The injunction applies nationwide except within the boundaries of the Second Circuit, which previously ruled against the networks in a similar case. | |||
Jenner & Block has continued to represent environmental groups such as the Alliance for the Great Lakes and Natural Resources Defense Council in a ] suit against ] regarding raw sewage.<ref> (2012), 11 C 8859.</ref> | |||
''] formerly Schwarzenegger v. EMA, et al.'' (2011) | |||
===''Pro bono'' work=== | |||
Jenner & Block attorneys representing the Entertainment Merchants Association convinced the United States Supreme Court to strike down a California law restricting the sale or rental of violent video and computer games to minors, which they argued ran afoul of the First Amendment’s freedom of speech and expression provision. | |||
According to annual surveys by ''The American Lawyer'', in 2014 and 2015, Jenner & Block was the leading law firm for per-attorney hours devoted to ] work in the US.<ref name= slightly>{{cite news| url= http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202730101637/Survey-Pro-Bono-Hours-Dip-Slightly-at-Am-Law-200-Firms| title= Survey: Pro Bono Hours Dip Slightly at Am Law 200 Firms| first= M. P. |last= McQueen| work= The American Lawyer| publisher= ALM Media Properties, LLC| date= June 29, 2015 | access-date= August 13, 2016|url-access=subscription }}</ref> From 2008 to 2015, it was the leader for five of those seven years.<ref name=CSullivan>{{cite news | |||
''Lehman Brothers Examiner'' (2009-2010)<ref>http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/03/11/lehman-directors-did-not-breach-duties-examiner-finds/?_r=0</ref><ref>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703625304575115963009594440.html</ref> | |||
| title= Jenner and Exelon: A Business Case for Pro Bono | |||
| date= April 13, 2015 | |||
| first= Casey | |||
| last= Sullivan | |||
| url= https://bol.bna.com/jenner-and-exelon-a-business-case-for-pro-bono/ | |||
| work= Bloomberg Law | |||
| publisher= The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. | |||
}}</ref> | |||
Recent pro bono victories include the acquittal of Jezon Young and the 2012 acquittal of Calvin Marshall who had been charged with murder.<ref>{{cite news| url= http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20140414/NEWS01/140419890/jenner-block-taps-new-managing-partner| date= April 14, 2014| title= Jenner & Block taps new managing partner| first= Steven R. | last= Strahler| newspaper= Crain's Chicago Business| access-date= August 14, 2016}}</ref> | |||
Jenner & Block Chairman Anton R. Valukas served as Court-appointed examiner in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy matter, leading an exhaustive investigation into and producing a universally acclaimed 2,200-page report on the causes of the failure of the global financial services firm. The resulting report, dubbed the “ ]”, was made public on March 13, 2010. In 2010, Valukas was invited to testify before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services, regarding the findings in the Examiner’s Report, alongside U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Federal Reserve System Chairman Ben Bernanke and SEC Chairperson Mary Schapiro; in 2011, he testified before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance and Investment. The information and insights he shared at these hearings influenced enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act and new SEC and FASB rules, making sweeping changes to America’s financial regulatory environment. For his “central role in the credit crisis,” Directorship named Valukas one of the 100 “most influential people in the boardroom” in 2010 and The American Lawyer Magazine named him its “#1 Newsmaker of the Year.” | |||
==Notable cases== | |||
''General Motors Company IPO'' (2010) | |||
*''Maple Flooring Manufacturers' Association v. US'': The firm had an early US Supreme Court victory in an antitrust case that helped establish its appellate credentials. The firm represented the Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association, a trade association based in ]. The US government charged that the group's activities — such as sharing weekly statistics showing charges that had been made for various grades of lumber during the previous week — violated the ]. The firm's principal litigator at the time, Edward Johnston, argued that the Association shared permissible economic information. In June 1925, the Court agreed. | |||
*] cases: In the 1930s, former chief justice of the ] ] successfully defended Chicago utility czar Samuel Insull in three separate federal and state trials related to the collapse of his empire after the ]. | |||
Jenner & Block served as lead outside counsel to the newly constituted General Motors Company in its initial public offering (IPO). On November 18, 2010, GM stock returned to trading on the New York Stock Exchange under its traditional “GM” stock symbol. The IPO involved concurrent offerings of $15.8 billion of common stock by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the governments of Canada and Ontario, and a UAW VEBA (Employee Benefit) trust and the issuance by GM of $4.4 billion of a new series of convertible preferred stock. Jenner & Block also represented General Motors Company in negotiating a five-year, $5 billion secured revolving credit facility, including a letter of credit sub-facility of up to $500 million, with Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC as joint lead arrangers; Citibank, N.A. as administrative agent; Bank of America, N.A. as the syndication agent; and a syndicate of lenders. | |||
* '']'': The firm represented William Witherspoon, who had been sentenced to death for the shooting death of a police officer, on a pro bono basis. In 1968, the US Supreme Court ruled that a state statute providing the state unlimited challenge for cause of jurors who might have any objection to the death penalty gave too much bias in favor of the prosecution. The Court reasoned: "A jury that must choose between life imprisonment and capital punishment can do little more — and must do nothing less — than express the conscience of the community on the ultimate question of life or death. Yet, in a nation less than half of whose people believe in the death penalty, a jury composed exclusively of such people cannot speak for the community."<ref name= WvI>, 391 U.S. 510 (1968); accessed January 4, 2016</ref> The Court added: "To execute this death sentence would deprive of his life without the ] of the law."<ref name= WvI /> As a result of the Witherspoon decision, more than 350 inmates on death row around the nation had their death sentences lifted.<ref>{{cite news| title= The Elder Statesman |first= Kevin |last= Davis |work= 2008 Illinois Super Lawyers |date= February 2008| url= http://www.superlawyers.com/illinois/article/The-Elder-Statesman/c71c91ae-4a97-4ca2-8dcf-d2a366ae0dc4.html| access-date= January 4, 2016}}</ref> | |||
*'']'': A significant case to ensure civil rights for the gay, lesbian and transgender community. In 2003, working with the ], the firm challenged Texas' anti-sodomy statute. The US Supreme Court struck down the statute, effectively invalidating anti-sodomy laws throughout the nation.<ref name=LvT>, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)</ref> Justice ] wrote that two gay men arrested after police walked in on them having sex "are entitled to respect for their private lives. The state cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime."<ref name=LvT /> | |||
] (2005)<ref>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_04_480</ref> | |||
* ]: After ] filed for bankruptcy in 2008—the largest bankruptcy in US history—the court hired Jenner & Block's Chairman Anton Valukas to examine Lehman's collapse. Some commentators pointed to the bankruptcy as a factor contributing to the late ].<ref>{{cite news| title=Bubble Trouble| first= Robert J. |last= Shiller |website=ProjectSyndicate.com| url= http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/bubble-trouble |date= September 17, 2007| access-date= January 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url= https://money.cnn.com/2009/01/20/magazines/fortune/okeefe_schiff.fortune/index.htm | title= Peter Schiff: Oh, he saw it coming| first= Brian |last= O'Keefe| date= January 23, 2009 |website=CNN.com| access-date= January 4, 2016}}</ref> In March 2010, Valukas issued his 2,200-page report on the matter.<ref name=here>{{cite news| work= Wall Street Journal| date= March 11, 2010| title= Lehman Brothers: Here Is a Copy of the Court Examiner's Report | first= Michael |last= Corkery }}</ref> | |||
* ]: In the late 2000s, General Motors had what ''The American Lawyer'' called a "near-death" experience as it filed for bankruptcy. In 2010, the $23 billion offering by GM set the record as the largest ] (IPO) in history. Jenner & Block represented GM as it went through bankruptcy and the subsequent IPO.<ref name=amlawdaily0509>{{cite news| url= http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2009/05/weil-dewey-jenner-and-honigman-heading-gm-legal-team.html | date= May 22, 2009 | title= Weil, Dewey, Jenner, and Honigman Heading GM Legal Team| first= Brian |last= Baxter| work= The AmLaw Daily| publisher= ALM| access-date= 4 January 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url= https://blogs.wsj.com/autoshow/2009/06/01/gm-press-release-on-new-gm/ | title= GM Press Release on 'New GM' | date= June 1, 2009| author= WSJ Staff| website= ] | access-date= 4 January 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url= http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202487436229/GMs-Jump-Start | title= GM's Jump Start: Joseph Gromacki of Jenner & Block| first= Vivia |last= Chen| website= AmericanLawyer.com | date=April 1, 2011 | access-date= January 4, 2016}}</ref> | |||
The Court unanimously held that defendant peer-to-peer file sharing companies ] and ] (maker of ]) could be sued for inducing ] for acts taken in the course of marketing file sharing software. The firm represented the plaintiffs, a consortium of 28 of the largest entertainment companies (led by ] studios). | |||
*'']'': The firm represented the Entertainment Merchants Association in a battle against a California law that restricted the sale or rental of violent video games to minors. In 2011, the US Supreme Court agreed with the firm's argument that the law violated the ]'s protection of freedom of speech and expression. Justice ] wrote that depictions of violence have never been subject to government regulation.<ref name= 28scotus>{{cite news| url= https://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/28/us/28scotus.html | title= Justices Reject Ban on Violent Video Games for Children| first= Adam| last= Liptak | date= 27 June 2011| location= Washington, DC| work= The New York Times| access-date= 4 January 2016}}</ref> | |||
*'']'': The firm represented a group of broadcasting company clients in a fight against ], Inc., a company that retransmitted copyrighted television programming without broadcaster authorization for a fee.<ref name=Aereo>{{cite news| url= https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/22/business/aereo-files-for-bankruptcy.html| title= Aereo Concedes Defeat and Files for Bankruptcy| first= Emily| last= Steel | date= 21 November 2014| access-date= 4 January 2016| work= The New York Times}}</ref> In June 2014, the US Supreme Court agreed with the firm's argument that Aereo violated copyright law. Aereo filed for ] in November 2014.<ref name=Aereo /> | |||
'']'' (2003) | |||
Partner ] successfully argued a landmark civil rights case before the U.S. Supreme Court, whose decision in Lawrence v. Texas effectively invalidated same-sex anti-sodomy laws throughout the country. This landmark civil rights decision is widely considered one of the the most important gay rights decision in a generation. | |||
] (1997)<ref>https://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/supreme-court-decision-reno-v-aclu-et-al</ref> | |||
The firm represented a group of clients including the ] in challenging anti-indecency provisions of the ]. The Court struck down the provisions, agreeing with the firm that they violated the ] guarantee of freedom of speech. This was the first major Supreme Court ruling on the regulation of materials distributed via the Internet. | |||
''MCI v. AT&T'' (1980) | |||
Jenner & Block rose to national prominence as a litigation firm during its ] fight with ] in the 1970s. Jenner & Block received the assignment from its former partner, John R. Worthington, who served as the General Counsel of Microwave Communications, Inc., the company that later became ]. Jenner & Block filed a lawsuit against AT&T in March 1974 alleging that AT&T had monopolized the market for telecommunications services in violation of the ]. The case came to trial in 1980 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois based in Chicago. AT&T was represented by what is now ]. After several months of trial, on June 13, 1980, a federal jury returned a verdict in favor of MCI in the amount of $600 million. After trebling the judgment as required by the antitrust laws, the $1.8 billion judgment was the largest monetary award in the history of American law. While the judgment was eventually thrown out on appeal and the case was settled for much less, it launched the break-up of the AT&T monopoly and established MCI as AT&T's primary competitor in the long-distance telephone market. | |||
'']'' (1968) <ref>“Pileup on Death Row” by Burton H. Wolfe (1973)</ref> | |||
This landmark death penalty case invalidated the death sentence of William Witherspoon for killing a police officer. In 1964, Federal Judge ] appointed as new appeals attorneys two past chairmen of the ] Defense of Incident Prisoners Committee: Jerold S. Solovy and ]. While studying the transcripts from the trial, Jerold Solovy noticed that of 96 potential jurors questioned during the jury selection, 47 were dismissed because they had scruples against the death penalty. ]. argued in front of the United States Supreme Court that this practice lead to a jury consisting of members in favor of the death penalty due to an Illinois statute that provided challenges for cause in murder trials “of any juror who shall, on being examined, state that he has conscientious scruples against capital punishment, or that he is opposed to the same”. Under the limitations of this statute, Jenner Jr. argued that victims were no longer being tried by a fair and impartial jury, which they were guaranteed under the ] and ] Amendments. | |||
==Supreme Court practice== | |||
Jenner & Block was one of the first national law firms to establish a Washington D.C. practice specifically focused on appeals before the U.S. ]. It was once headed by the late Bruce Ennis, Jr., who argued more than a dozen cases before the Supreme Court during his career, including an unprecedented three cases arising under different provisions of the same law, the landmark ] of 1996, see Reno, Turner, and Iowa Utilities Board cases below. The appellate practice is led by ]. A number of lawyers in the Washington D.C. office are former clerks to the Supreme Court. | |||
''General Dynamics Corp. v. United States'' (2011) <ref>http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/general-dynamics-corp-v-united-states/</ref> | |||
The firm was lead counsel for General Dynamics in an important and long-running government contracts case. The Court vacated a ruling of the Federal Circuit adverse to the contractors and remanded for further proceedings. | |||
''FCC v. Nextwave'' (2003) | |||
The firm represented NextWave in its U.S. Supreme Court victory that returned to NextWave billions of dollars worth of wireless phone spectrum licenses that the Federal Communication Commission had attempted to repossess after the company failed to make installment payments on the licenses while reorganizing under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. | |||
''].'' (2003) <ref>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_02_361</ref> | |||
The firm represented a group of public libraries, library associations, library patrons, and web site publishers in challenging the constitutionality of Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), which required public libraries to use Internet filters as condition for receipt of federal subsidies. | |||
'']'' (2003) <ref>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_02_311 (2003)</ref> | |||
The firm represented a death row inmate in a case establishing that attorneys in capital cases must diligently investigate the background of their clients to find possible mitigating evidence that could sway a jury’s or a judge’s sentencing decision. The United States Supreme Court spelled out standards for "effectiveness" in the constitutional right to legal counsel guaranteed by the ]. The court set forth the ] Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases Guideline 11.8.6.(1989), as a specific guideline by which to measure effectiveness and competence of ]. Kevin Wiggins was represented by Donald Verrilli Jr. for more than a decade during the appeals process. | |||
''AT&T v. Iowa Utilities Board'' (1999) <ref>http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/attviowa/Default.htm</ref> | |||
The 1996 Telecommunications Act (Act) fundamentally altered local telephone markets by ending the monopolies traditionally given to local exchange carriers (LECs) by states and subjecting LECs to a host of duties meant to facilitate market entry. Among these duties: compelling carriers to share their networks with competitors. AT&T challenged their constitutionality on behalf of itself and other existing phone service providers. Jenner & Block successfully argued on behalf of competitive communications providers to defend authority of FCC to set UNE cost-setting methodology. In a complicated split opinion, the Court held that the FCC has rulemaking authority to uphold those provision of the Act in question. Despite the local nature of some of the LECs involved, the Court emphasized their interconnectivity with regional and national carriers. As such, the FCC could also reach local LEC markets and regulate their competitive business practices. Such regulatory authority would include the ability to tell LECs what portions of their services they had to share with new competitors, allow new competitors to use local networks without having to own them, and forbid incumbent LECs from separating their network elements before leasing them to competitors.<ref>http://ics642.wikidot.com/at-t-corp-v-iowa-utilities-board</ref> | |||
''Turner Broadcasting System v. FCC'' (1994)<ref>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_95_992</ref> | |||
The firm represented the broadcast industry in defending key provisions of new legislation governing the cable television industry, in both the Court’s initial review setting the appropriate constitutional standard and its final review that the statute met the standard. Both times, the Court’s opinions tracked the specific approach and arguments presented by Jenner & Block. | |||
''Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association v. U.S.'' (1925)<ref>http://www.mmmlaw.com/media-room/publications/articles/legal-and-ethical-issues-in-obtaining-and-sharing-information1</ref> | |||
Edward R. Johnston defended against the Department of Justice’s vigorous attack that the exchange of information by trade association members was an antitrust violation. In Maple Flooring, the Supreme Court held that there was no evidence of an agreement to raise prices or any evidence of an increase in prices as a result of the exchange of information. The Maple Flooring Manufacturers’ Association circulated to its members the price components of hard wood flooring; however, the parties to the individual transactions were not identified, the information reflected exclusively past transactions, and the information was available to consumers as well as members of the association. Even though the exchange of information by the association resulted in a stabilization of trade practices and price, the Supreme Court held that those restraints were not "unreasonable" and only became so in a competitive market situation when "improper use is made of that information through any concerted action which operates to restrain the freedom of action of those who buy and sell." | |||
==Recognition== | ==Recognition== | ||
The firm has won many awards for its work.<ref name= awardsJB> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180113035547/https://jenner.com/about/firm/about/awards |date=2018-01-13 }}, Jenner & Block; retrieved May 14, 2015.</ref> In 2012 and 2013, it was listed as one of the 20 most elite law firms by ''The American Lawyer'', with inclusion on the magazine's A-List for revenue generation, ] commitment, associate satisfaction and diversity representation.<ref name="VAULT">{{cite book|title= Vault Guide to the Top Law Firms for General Commercial Litigation|year= 2014 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yQRcAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT127|publisher=Infobase Learning|isbn=978-1-58131-913-2|page=127}}</ref> In 2012 and 2014, the firm was awarded the Chambers USA "Award for Excellence" as the top law firm for media and entertainment litigation.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150504003859/http://www.chambersandpartners.com/chambers-usa-awards-for-excellence-2012#media |date=2015-05-04 }}, Chambers & Partners; retrieved May 14, 2014.</ref> | |||
Jenner & Block has been repeatedly recognized by the legal industry. The firm was named by ] to its 2013 A-List,<ref>http://www.americanlawyer.com/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202498700231</ref> recognized by the second consecutive year as among the 20 most elite law firms in the United States. Firms are evaluated based on revenue generation, pro bono commitment, associate satisfaction and diversity representation. The firm has been named five times overall in the 10 years the ranking was instituted in 2003. | |||
Chambers USA<ref>http://www.chambersandpartners.com/guide/usa/5#</ref> again recognized Jenner & Block as among the country’s leading law firms in its 2013 edition. Jenner & Block was ranked as a leading firm in 22 areas, including six national categories and 16 state categories. Of those, the firm received six “Band 1” practice rankings, Chambers’ highest level of recommendation, based on its assessment of marketplace commentary and “the volume, complexity and size of work” undertaken. Forty attorneys were recognized as leaders in their respective practice areas. The firm also won the Chambers Award for Excellence in Insurance (Policyholder in 2013). Calling Jenner & Block a “powerful presence on both coasts and in the Midwest,” Chambers USA honored the team, led by Practice Chair John C. Mathias, for its work in “sophisticated, high-stakes” proceedings. In 2012, Chambers honored the Content, Media and Entertainment Practice with the Award for Excellence in media, observing that the firm “has an unparalleled track record in media and entertainment litigation, particularly involving copyright and content protection issues.” | |||
In 2015, '']'' named Jenner & Block to its "Appellate Hot List," a list of 20 national firms "with outstanding achievements before the US Supreme Court, federal circuit courts and state courts of last resort."<ref>{{cite web| title=The 2015 Appellate Hot List: Winning Big Cases, Changing the Law| work= The National Law Journal| date=November 16, 2015 | url= http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202742390456/The-2015-Appellate-Hot-List-Winning-Big-Cases-Changing-the-Law}}</ref> That marked the seventh consecutive year that the firm was so ranked.<ref>{{cite web| title= Jenner & Block| first=Mike |last=Sacks| work= The National Law Journal| date= November 16, 2015|url= http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202742389565/Jenner-amp-Block | access-date= January 4, 2016}}</ref> The firm was also named to ''The National Law Journal'''s 2015 "IP Hot List."<ref>{{cite web| title= The 2015 IP Hot List| work= The National Law Journal| date= June 1, 2015 | url= http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202727880211/The-2015-IP-Hot-List | access-date= January 4, 2016}}</ref> Also in 2015, ] named the firm's Bankruptcy, Workout and Corporate Reorganization Practice a "Bankruptcy Group of the Year."<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.law360.com/articles/611331/bankruptcy-group-of-the-year-jenner-block |title= Bankruptcy Group of the Year: Jenner & Block| first= Matt |last= Chiappardi| website= Law360.com| date= 14 January 2015| access-date= 11 May 2015}}</ref> | |||
In 2013, Jenner & Block was named to the ] “Appellate Hot List”<ref>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?germane=1202602421652&id=1202602413952</ref> for the fifth consecutive year base on its exemplary contributions to appellate practice and an impressive overall track record. | |||
The firm’s copyright practice also has been recognized nationally in recent years. The Legal 500<ref>http://www.legal500.com/firms/50501/53434</ref> has twice heralded Jenner & Block’s copyright practice as No. 1 in the United States – “a pre-eminent choice for copyright litigation,” with a client base “dominated by A-list heavyweights in the entertainment field.” Managing Intellectual Property magazine named Jenner & Block “Copyright Firm of the Year” in 2010 and 2011. | |||
In 2005, the firm received the ] "Legal Service Award" for its work with ] inmates.<ref>{{Dead link|date=October 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, Jenner & Block; retrieved May 16, 2015.</ref><ref name= awardsJB /> The New York office is a strong contributor to the firm's commitment to pro bono and public service. A team, along with the at ], successfully represented a proposed nationwide class of ] veterans suffering from ] who challenged their ]s from the military.<ref>{{Cite web|title = Vets Clinic Wins Case over Bad Discharges for Vietnam Veterans with PTSD - Yale Law School|url = https://www.law.yale.edu/yls-today/news/vets-clinic-wins-case-over-bad-discharges-vietnam-veterans-ptsd|website = www.law.yale.edu| date=22 June 2015 |access-date = 2015-12-15}}</ref> In addition to securing discharge upgrades for the named plaintiffs, the representation also prompted the ] to issue new guidance to the administrative boards hearing discharge upgrade requests to consider PTSD diagnoses for veterans, a result that should help thousands of veterans. | |||
==Clients== | |||
In 2015, Jenner & Block was ranked first among all US law firms in the volume of its pro bono work<ref name="AL profile" /> and has ranked first in pro bono work in five of the past seven years, according to ''The American Lawyer'' annual rankings.<ref>{{cite web| title= Pro Bono Report 2015: Treading Water| work=The American Lawyer| date=July 20, 2015| url= http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202730400870/Pro-Bono-Report-2015-Treading-Water}}</ref><ref>, Bloomberg BNA, 13 April 2015; retrieved May 11, 2015.</ref> | |||
Jenner & Block has represented currently or in the past the following clients: | |||
==Offices== | |||
*] | |||
Jenner & Block is headquartered in downtown Chicago. In 1982, the firm opened an office in Washington.<ref>, Jenner & Block</ref> In 2005, a New York City office was launched<ref>, Jenner & Block</ref> followed by the opening of a Los Angeles office in 2009. In April 2015, the firm opened a London office, its first outside the U.S.<ref>{{cite news| url= http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20150324/NEWS04/150329924/jenner-block-to-open-first-overseas-office |title= Jenner & Block to open first overseas office| first= Claire |last= Bushey| work=]|date= 24 March 2015| access-date= 11 May 2015}}</ref> | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] including in the '']'' case | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==See also== | |||
==Prominent lawyers and alumni== | |||
] | |||
*], Professor, ] | |||
*], name partner | |||
*], longtime partner, now retired | |||
*], United States District Judge for the ] | |||
*], CEO of ] | |||
*], former National Legal Director, ] | |||
*], Professor, ] | |||
*], former General Counsel, ] | |||
*], former General Counsel of ] | |||
*], name partner | |||
*], managing partner | |||
*], United States District Judge for the ] | |||
*], current partner | |||
*], Professor, ] | |||
*], Chief Legal Officer of ] | |||
*], U.S. District Judge for the ] | |||
*], General Counsel of ] | |||
*], Associate Attorney General of the United States | |||
*], current partner | |||
*], current partner | |||
*], General Counsel of ] | |||
*], current partner | |||
*], firm Chairman Emeritus | |||
*], Associate Justice of the Supreme Court | |||
*], CEO of ] | |||
*], former Dean of Washington & Lee Univ. School of Law, current partner | |||
*], former U.S. Attorney and current partner | |||
*], Founder MacArthur Justice Center and current partner | |||
*], former Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit | |||
*], former U.S. Attorney and current firm Chairman | |||
*]., Solicitor General of the United States and former Deputy White House Counsel | |||
*], ] General Counsel<ref>{{cite pressrelease |url=http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/andrew-weissmann-appointed-as-fbis-general-counsel?utm_campaign=email-Immediate&utm_medium=email&utm_source=national-press-releases&utm_content=40879|title=Andrew Weissmann Appointed as FBI’s General Counsel |publisher=FBI National Press Office |date=October 26, 2011 |accessdate=October 26, 2011}}</ref> | |||
*], longtime General Counsel of ] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* |
*{{Official website|www.jenner.com}} | ||
{{-}} | |||
{{Illinois Corporations}} | {{Illinois Corporations}} | ||
{{Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Jenner and Block}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Jenner and Block}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 01:41, 14 November 2024
American law firmHeadquarters | 353 North Clark Chicago, Illinois, United States |
---|---|
No. of offices | 6 |
No. of attorneys | 434 |
Major practice areas | General practice |
Key people | Thomas J. Perrelli, Chairman; Katya Jestin and Randall E. Mehrberg, Co-Managing Partners |
Revenue | $408M (2014) |
Date founded | 1914 |
Founder | Jacob Newman, Conrad Poppenhusen, and Henry Stern |
Company type | Limited liability partnership |
Website | Jenner & Block |
Jenner & Block is an American law firm with offices in Century City, Chicago, London, Los Angeles, New York City, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. The firm is active in corporate litigation, business transactions, the public sector, and other legal fields. It has litigated several prominent cases before the United States Supreme Court. As of 2014, it was the 103rd-largest law firm in the US, based on The American Lawyer's annual ranking of firms by headcount.
History
The firm was founded in Chicago in 1914 as Newman, Poppenhusen & Stern. In late 1928, a former chief justice of the Illinois Supreme Court, Floyd Thompson, joined the firm. Known commonly as "The Judge," Thompson handled several high-profile cases for the firm. Albert E. Jenner, Jr., who served as a former assistant counsel to the Warren Commission, established Jenner & Block's longstanding relationship representing General Dynamics in the 1950s. He later was senior minority counsel on the impeachment inquiry staff for the Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment process against Richard Nixon, but was replaced in July 1974 after advocating for the impeachment of Nixon.
Jenner & Block was one of the first national law firms to establish a Washington practice specifically focused on appeals before the U.S. Supreme Court. A number of lawyers in the Washington office have served as clerks to the US Supreme Court. This office was once headed by Bruce Ennis, Jr., who argued more than a dozen cases before the Supreme Court, including three cases arising under different provisions of the same law, the landmark Telecommunications Act of 1996. The appellate practice was once led by Paul M. Smith. Donald Verrilli Jr., who succeeded Elena Kagan as U.S. solicitor general during the Obama administration, is a former member of the practice.
The firm was one of the first large firms in the U.S. to establish a pro bono program.
Since its founding, the firm has had 10 names. The name of the firm was changed to Raymond Mayer Jenner & Block in 1964 after Samuel W. Block became a name partner. In 1969, it was shortened to its present form.
Prominent legal work
The firm has a history of litigating and representation in prominent cases, including several argued before the US Supreme Court. The firm's 1985 antitrust lawsuit of AT&T, on behalf of MCI, sowed the seeds for the eventual break-up of telecommunications monopoly in the 1980s.
The firm's involvement in civil rights cases spans decades. In the 1960s, the firm represented prominent Chicago cardiologist Jeremiah Stamler when he was subpoenaed to testify before the House Committee on Un-American Activities. The firm sued the Committee, seeking to have its mandate declared unconstitutional. After eight and a half years of litigation in the 1960s and 70s, the government agreed to drop its indictment against Dr. Stamler for contempt of Congress, and the doctor agreed to drop his civil suit against the Committee. In 1975, Congress officially abolished HUAC, by that time known as the Internal Security Committee.
In 2009, then firm chairman Anton R. Valukas was appointed as the examiner in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, and he hired Jenner & Block to produce the report that captured the findings of a year-long investigation of the bank's finances. In 2010, the firm oversaw General Motors' $23.1 billion initial public offering of common stock and Series B mandatory convertible junior preferred stock, the largest US IPO ever at the time.
The firm has achieved several victories before the US Supreme Court regarding free speech, gay rights, copyright, civil procedure, political asylum and other matters. The firm's first principal litigator, Edward R. Johnston, earned the firm's first Supreme Court victory, a landmark antitrust case against the US government (Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association v. U.S.) that allowed for trade association members to exchange information.
The firm represented plaintiff Stephen Law in Law v. Siegel in the US Supreme Court in 2014; it had already been representing the plaintiff Law (who had earlier represented himself) in the US Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit). The Supreme Court overturned a California court's decision to allow Law's home equity to be used as payment for legal fees to a trustee, even though the equity was protected by the state's homestead exemption.
Jenner & Block has continued to represent environmental groups such as the Alliance for the Great Lakes and Natural Resources Defense Council in a Clean Water Act suit against Chicago's Metropolitan Water Reclamation District regarding raw sewage.
Pro bono work
According to annual surveys by The American Lawyer, in 2014 and 2015, Jenner & Block was the leading law firm for per-attorney hours devoted to pro bono work in the US. From 2008 to 2015, it was the leader for five of those seven years.
Recent pro bono victories include the acquittal of Jezon Young and the 2012 acquittal of Calvin Marshall who had been charged with murder.
Notable cases
- Maple Flooring Manufacturers' Association v. US: The firm had an early US Supreme Court victory in an antitrust case that helped establish its appellate credentials. The firm represented the Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association, a trade association based in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The US government charged that the group's activities — such as sharing weekly statistics showing charges that had been made for various grades of lumber during the previous week — violated the Sherman Act. The firm's principal litigator at the time, Edward Johnston, argued that the Association shared permissible economic information. In June 1925, the Court agreed.
- Sam Insull cases: In the 1930s, former chief justice of the Illinois Supreme Court Floyd Thompson successfully defended Chicago utility czar Samuel Insull in three separate federal and state trials related to the collapse of his empire after the Great Depression.
- Witherspoon v. Illinois: The firm represented William Witherspoon, who had been sentenced to death for the shooting death of a police officer, on a pro bono basis. In 1968, the US Supreme Court ruled that a state statute providing the state unlimited challenge for cause of jurors who might have any objection to the death penalty gave too much bias in favor of the prosecution. The Court reasoned: "A jury that must choose between life imprisonment and capital punishment can do little more — and must do nothing less — than express the conscience of the community on the ultimate question of life or death. Yet, in a nation less than half of whose people believe in the death penalty, a jury composed exclusively of such people cannot speak for the community." The Court added: "To execute this death sentence would deprive of his life without the due process of the law." As a result of the Witherspoon decision, more than 350 inmates on death row around the nation had their death sentences lifted.
- Lawrence v. Texas: A significant case to ensure civil rights for the gay, lesbian and transgender community. In 2003, working with the Lambda Legal Defense Fund, the firm challenged Texas' anti-sodomy statute. The US Supreme Court struck down the statute, effectively invalidating anti-sodomy laws throughout the nation. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that two gay men arrested after police walked in on them having sex "are entitled to respect for their private lives. The state cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime."
- Lehman Brothers bankruptcy: After Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy in 2008—the largest bankruptcy in US history—the court hired Jenner & Block's Chairman Anton Valukas to examine Lehman's collapse. Some commentators pointed to the bankruptcy as a factor contributing to the late 2000s global financial crisis. In March 2010, Valukas issued his 2,200-page report on the matter.
- General Motors bankruptcy: In the late 2000s, General Motors had what The American Lawyer called a "near-death" experience as it filed for bankruptcy. In 2010, the $23 billion offering by GM set the record as the largest initial public offering (IPO) in history. Jenner & Block represented GM as it went through bankruptcy and the subsequent IPO.
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association: The firm represented the Entertainment Merchants Association in a battle against a California law that restricted the sale or rental of violent video games to minors. In 2011, the US Supreme Court agreed with the firm's argument that the law violated the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech and expression. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that depictions of violence have never been subject to government regulation.
- American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc.: The firm represented a group of broadcasting company clients in a fight against Aereo, Inc., a company that retransmitted copyrighted television programming without broadcaster authorization for a fee. In June 2014, the US Supreme Court agreed with the firm's argument that Aereo violated copyright law. Aereo filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in November 2014.
Recognition
The firm has won many awards for its work. In 2012 and 2013, it was listed as one of the 20 most elite law firms by The American Lawyer, with inclusion on the magazine's A-List for revenue generation, pro-bono commitment, associate satisfaction and diversity representation. In 2012 and 2014, the firm was awarded the Chambers USA "Award for Excellence" as the top law firm for media and entertainment litigation.
In 2015, The National Law Journal named Jenner & Block to its "Appellate Hot List," a list of 20 national firms "with outstanding achievements before the US Supreme Court, federal circuit courts and state courts of last resort." That marked the seventh consecutive year that the firm was so ranked. The firm was also named to The National Law Journal's 2015 "IP Hot List." Also in 2015, Law360 named the firm's Bankruptcy, Workout and Corporate Reorganization Practice a "Bankruptcy Group of the Year."
In 2005, the firm received the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty's "Legal Service Award" for its work with death row inmates. The New York office is a strong contributor to the firm's commitment to pro bono and public service. A team, along with the Veterans Legal Services Clinic at Yale Law School, successfully represented a proposed nationwide class of Vietnam War veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder who challenged their less-than-honorable discharges from the military. In addition to securing discharge upgrades for the named plaintiffs, the representation also prompted the Secretary of Defense to issue new guidance to the administrative boards hearing discharge upgrade requests to consider PTSD diagnoses for veterans, a result that should help thousands of veterans.
In 2015, Jenner & Block was ranked first among all US law firms in the volume of its pro bono work and has ranked first in pro bono work in five of the past seven years, according to The American Lawyer annual rankings.
Offices
Jenner & Block is headquartered in downtown Chicago. In 1982, the firm opened an office in Washington. In 2005, a New York City office was launched followed by the opening of a Los Angeles office in 2009. In April 2015, the firm opened a London office, its first outside the U.S.
See also
List of largest United States-based law firms by profits per partner
References
- ^ "Offices", Jenner & Block; retrieved May 11, 2015.
- ^ "Jenner & Block profile". The American Lawyer. Retrieved 11 May 2015.
- profile, Jenner.com
- Firm history, Jenner.com
- "Albert E. Jenner, 81, a Watergate Counsel", The New York Times, September 30, 1988; retrieved May 14, 2015.
- Farrel, William E. (January 25, 1974). "Man in the News: G.O.P. Aide in Inquiry" (PDF). The New York Times. p. 17.
- "Albert E. Jenner, 81, A Watergate Counsel". The New York Times. September 20, 1988. Retrieved July 26, 2017.
- "Jenner & Block LLP" Archived 2015-04-26 at the Wayback Machine, Chambers and Partners; retrieved May 14, 2015.
- "Our Firm", Jenner & Block; retrieved May 14, 2015.
- Paul M. Smith Archived 2015-03-16 at the Wayback Machine, Chambers & Partners; retrieved May 14, 2015.
- Meet the Solicitor General Archived 2016-03-06 at the Wayback Machine, US Department of Justice; retrieved May 27, 2014.
- Winter, Christine (23 May 1985). "MCI-AT&T Suit Goes To The Jury: Firms Billions Of Dollars Apart In Damages". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
- Dealbook (11 March 2010). "Court-appointed Lehman examiner unveils report". The New York Times. Retrieved 11 May 2015.
- Spector, Mike; Craig, Susanne; Lattman, Peter (11 March 2010). "Examiner: 'Lehman Torpedoed Lehman'". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 11 May 2015.
- "Jenner's Chair, Anton Valukas, to Probe Lehman Bros. as New Examiner". ABA Journal. 20 January 2009.
- "Form S-1: Registration Statement under The Securities Act of 1933: General Motors Company". Washington, D.C.: Securities and Exchange Commission. 18 August 2010. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
- Isidore, Chris (18 November 2010). "GM IPO biggest ever". CNN Money. Retrieved 11 May 2015.
- Warren, James; Possley, Maurice; Tybor, Joseph (22 January 1985). "Jenner & Block's Howe the pro of professional societies". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 8 June 2015.
- ^ McQueen, M. P. (June 29, 2015). "Survey: Pro Bono Hours Dip Slightly at Am Law 200 Firms". The American Lawyer. ALM Media Properties, LLC. Retrieved August 13, 2016.
- U.S. v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (2012), 11 C 8859.
- Sullivan, Casey (April 13, 2015). "Jenner and Exelon: A Business Case for Pro Bono". Bloomberg Law. The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
- Strahler, Steven R. (April 14, 2014). "Jenner & Block taps new managing partner". Crain's Chicago Business. Retrieved August 14, 2016.
- ^ Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968); accessed January 4, 2016
- Davis, Kevin (February 2008). "The Elder Statesman". 2008 Illinois Super Lawyers. Retrieved January 4, 2016.
- ^ Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)
- Shiller, Robert J. (September 17, 2007). "Bubble Trouble". ProjectSyndicate.com. Retrieved January 4, 2016.
- O'Keefe, Brian (January 23, 2009). "Peter Schiff: Oh, he saw it coming". CNN.com. Retrieved January 4, 2016.
- Corkery, Michael (March 11, 2010). "Lehman Brothers: Here Is a Copy of the Court Examiner's Report". Wall Street Journal.
- Baxter, Brian (May 22, 2009). "Weil, Dewey, Jenner, and Honigman Heading GM Legal Team". The AmLaw Daily. ALM. Retrieved 4 January 2016.
- WSJ Staff (June 1, 2009). "GM Press Release on 'New GM'". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 4 January 2016.
- Chen, Vivia (April 1, 2011). "GM's Jump Start: Joseph Gromacki of Jenner & Block". AmericanLawyer.com. Retrieved January 4, 2016.
- Liptak, Adam (27 June 2011). "Justices Reject Ban on Violent Video Games for Children". The New York Times. Washington, DC. Retrieved 4 January 2016.
- ^ Steel, Emily (21 November 2014). "Aereo Concedes Defeat and Files for Bankruptcy". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 January 2016.
- ^ "Awards" Archived 2018-01-13 at the Wayback Machine, Jenner & Block; retrieved May 14, 2015.
- Vault Guide to the Top Law Firms for General Commercial Litigation. Infobase Learning. 2014. p. 127. ISBN 978-1-58131-913-2.
- "Media: Jenner & Block Chambers USA Awards for Excellence 2012" Archived 2015-05-04 at the Wayback Machine, Chambers & Partners; retrieved May 14, 2014.
- "The 2015 Appellate Hot List: Winning Big Cases, Changing the Law". The National Law Journal. November 16, 2015.
- Sacks, Mike (November 16, 2015). "Jenner & Block". The National Law Journal. Retrieved January 4, 2016.
- "The 2015 IP Hot List". The National Law Journal. June 1, 2015. Retrieved January 4, 2016.
- Chiappardi, Matt (14 January 2015). "Bankruptcy Group of the Year: Jenner & Block". Law360.com. Retrieved 11 May 2015.
- "Firm honored by NCADP for death penalty reform efforts", Jenner & Block; retrieved May 16, 2015.
- "Vets Clinic Wins Case over Bad Discharges for Vietnam Veterans with PTSD - Yale Law School". www.law.yale.edu. 22 June 2015. Retrieved 2015-12-15.
- "Pro Bono Report 2015: Treading Water". The American Lawyer. July 20, 2015.
- "Jenner and Exelon: A business case for pro bono", Bloomberg BNA, 13 April 2015; retrieved May 11, 2015.
- Washington, D.C. office, Jenner & Block
- New York office, Jenner & Block
- Bushey, Claire (24 March 2015). "Jenner & Block to open first overseas office". Crain's Chicago Business. Retrieved 11 May 2015.