Misplaced Pages

Talk:Jimmy Carr: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:28, 13 April 2024 editMartinevans123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers232,799 edits Personal life - removing inaccurate information/depression: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:24, 14 November 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,273,913 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 6 WikiProject templates. (Fix Category:Pages with redundant living parameter)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(31 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}} {{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=C|living=yes|listas=Carr, Jimmy|1= {{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=C|listas=Carr, Jimmy|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-priority=mid|a&e-work-group=yes}} {{WikiProject Biography|a&e-priority=mid|a&e-work-group=yes}}
{{WikiProject Buckinghamshire|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Buckinghamshire|importance=Low}}
Line 11: Line 11:
| algo = old(90d) | algo = old(90d)
| archive = Talk:Jimmy Carr/Archive %(counter)d | archive = Talk:Jimmy Carr/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1 | counter = 2
| maxarchivesize = 125K | maxarchivesize = 125K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
Line 18: Line 18:
}} }}
<!-- Template:Setup auto archiving --> <!-- Template:Setup auto archiving -->
== A couple of corrections == == America ==


Trying to use search engines for research is very difficult lately as the algorithms push you towards what they THINK you are looking for, regardless of how many search operators etc. you use. Which means, while researching the '''Edinburgh''' information I had to use really broad search terms, only restricted by date filters.
He was a virgin until 26 according to himself on BBC's "would I lie to you?"
He attended Burnham Grammar School in Buckinghamshire up till sixth form when he moved to RGS <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)</small>


Although an annoyance – it meant that I’ve collected a LOT of information on other un-related people, gigs and events. Much of which will probably now have to wait until the Winter for me to sort through (chores to do and all that).
:His virginity is not currently mentioned? But the schools seem to be correct. Thanks. ] (]) 17:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


Despite making so many trips Stateside (virtually once or twice a year) there are very few press reports. UK MSM are not interested (unless it’s a “cancel x person for a joke” story) and BCG / Chortle appear to be pretty much run on a shoe string and so rely on being fed stories. We don’t celebrate our UK comedy scene enough!!
== Irish ==


The LA Comedy Store, for example, is legendary (to comedians and comedy fans) as the place that developed everyone from Richard Pryor to Robin Williams to Jim Carrey. As an Alumnus of the club (a rare honour, to be bestowed upon a Brit) Carr can turn up any time he’s in town and just perform. But finding an official record is tricky – so I’ve had to leave it a bit vague and have left many appearances out (not sure the Misplaced Pages guidelines would accept single tweets from punters).
The article clearly states: "He has dual British and Irish citizenship, travels on an Irish passport, has spoken of his pride in having Irish ancestry, and was presented in 2013 with a certificate of Irish heritage in his parents' home city of ] by the city's mayor." The source is . So the fact he is British-Irish is neither "lies" nor "a typo". ] (]) 10:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)


Where I’ve felt it’s important to note an appearance I’ve used, for example, the X account of the official Comedy Store, so that it’s not just some random user who might have their account removed. Is that acceptable?
:id there any evidence or sources he has British citizenship? I've just had a quick look and he only ever refers to his Irish passport. Given the CTA there would of been a need for him to get British citizenship. ] (]) 06:21, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
::He's said it in interviews - also found it on https://ireland-calling.com/citizenship/jimmy-carr-irish-citizenship/ ] (]) 15:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


Although I would imagine some would think that listing too many TV shows is trying to turn this into IMDB – my perspective is that the American late-night shows give massive exposure and a Brit artist getting repeated invites to these shows is a huge career boost. There are many, many more shows he has appeared on – these are just the biggies.
== Tour dates ==


I’ve highlighted Netflix a fair bit as he seems to be well regarded and “plays nicely” with other comedians – hence his collaborations. Again – there are many more that I couldn’t find citations for, where has worked with / supported other US stars.
I find this site really tricky to edit - can someone else edit the Terribly Funny 2.0 date to end in 2024 please? He's adding new dates all the time but the USA is already showing as up to April 2024. Thx


The one thing that I think someone may “object” to is the section main title “America” then covering TV and stand up, which doesn’t fit the format of the paragraphs above.
https://www.jimmycarr.com/live-tour/usa/


A lot of work has gone into this so, if anyone is unhappy, can we please talk about it, rather than just nuke the lot…always nervous about doing a big update. And it’s heartbreaking when something gets removed without warning. ] (]) 13:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
] (]) 16:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


== SUFH 2023 _ Daily Mail Citation ==
:We have to be careful not to turn this article into a tour promo outlet... ] (]) 17:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
::It is a tour promo or is it just correcting inaccurate information? The page initially said that the tour ends in 2023 and it ends in 2024 (I've managed to alter it since). I didn't put the dates on there originally so my assumption was that, if it's something that you (you, meaning the site) want to display, then it should be accurate?? Happy to be corrected - but logging off for the evening. TTFN. ] (]) 17:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Yes, it's something that ''we'' (meaning you, me and other editors) might want to display. If the tour hasn't ended, then yes, the article shouldn't say it has. ] (]) 17:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
::::That's a relief! ] (]) 10:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)


Hello @]
== Bio image ==


I would like to restore my citation (2023 SUFH – Daily Mail) and so am launching this discussion.
Is someone able to update the bio image, from that 2015 one? Misplaced Pages comes out quite high in search results and this old image sticks out like a sore thumb. I can't figure out how to upload one....or I would do it myself


One of the things that I find frustrating about editing Misplaced Pages is how different people have such differing opinions (of how to apply the rules) and so, months after editing something, one person can decide that it doesn’t fit somehow and you are back at square 1 and having to dig out old notes.
Plenty of new images in his website - expand the About section to find some smaller ones https://www.jimmycarr.com/about/


I’m assuming you think the DM is an “unreliable tabloid” but in this instance it’s a properly reported story of a charity event, that occurred in a different country. With regard to this particular type of event – why would something be more legitimate if it was in the Grauniad? (or similar).
] (]) 16:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


As it’s a British Comedian at a US event it didn’t get a lot of coverage and this was the BEST overview I could find. And when I say the best – it’s getting harder and harder to find stories that are not behind a paywall and, as more MSM websites struggle financially, this is only going to get worse. I always try and find something that everyone can read and that delivers all the facts.
:The most likely reason that the image hasn't been updated yet is that all of the photos of Jimmy Carr on his website fall under copyright, so we can't use it. If we want a better photo of him, someone would have to request it from him or someone that represents him. There are some instructions on how to do this: ]. The reason our picture is from 2015 is because that was the last time a photographer took a picture of him and uploaded it to Misplaced Pages as their "own work". ]] 15:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
::There are some others at , but all are of the same age or older. A Google search for Creative Commons licenses yields a few at Flickr, but they are not very good quality. ] (]) 15:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you - I moved on a little bit, since posting this. I've got one from his new tour (2023) that I've been given permission to use (by Chambers Management) - but am waiting to find out which copyright thingy it falls under as they told me the photographer and so on - but not the classification. Soon as I get a response on that I can update it. Thx ] (]) 16:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Yes, the copyright licence is critical. I have found the whole process to be a potential minefield and have given up on a number of occasions. ] (]) 16:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
::::You've just made me even more determined to get it updated!! Wish me luck. ] (]) 16:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::You are aware that edit Misplaced Pages is a privilege, not a right?
:::::And I advice you to read ] and ]. <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">]&nbsp;]</span> 16:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::Errr - not sure why you are giving me attitude over a jokey response! ] (]) 17:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::{{small|You are aware that making jokey responses is a privilege, not a right? ] (]) 17:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC)}}
::::::::I'm thinking my fingers are going to get me into trouble, the way this has gone downhill! ] (]) 17:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::{{small|You are aware that downhill fingers are a privilege, not a right?! lol ] (])}}


With this event there is a link that I could use, from the Bob Woodruff Foundation, that says who was '''GOING''' to be there – but I thought a story, written after the event, that had proof and pictures was more appropriate.
== Informal tone, style problems, original research ==


Regardless of who is behind the URL – should accuracy and photographs not count for something? I get why there is an overall feeling that tabloids are to be avoided – but isn’t it a little knee jerk to just see “Daily Mail” and reject, without actually looking at the content?
I rolled back a bunch of changes by {{u|SecretSquirrel9}} who introduced many problems to the biography, especially regarding the podcasts. It looks like we are trying to dig up a history of his radio appearances and podcasts taken from the items themselves rather than ] sources analysing his career. The self-published website rickygervais.tumblr.com cannot be considered authoritative. Interviews with Carr are not analysis of his career.


Can we talk?        :o)) ] (]) 06:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
What record did Carr supposedly break in performing 17+ times at Birmingham Symphony Hall? How is it that petermcgraw.org is able to give Carr the honorific of "hardest working man in comedy"? Carr's own website should not be used to describe a career arc.


:Talking to myself (I find I get more sense this way!)... I've put the DM link back in as, apart from photos on places like Getty images, the only other really visible information was the announcement on the Woodruff Foundation site (which I've also added).
Style problems include using numerals for single-digit numbers rather than writing out the number. ] (]) 13:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:As mentioned above - I have inserted both as the Woodruff link was only announcing the "intent" for him to host, whereas the DM story is confirmation that it really happened. I think having both completes the circle. ] (]) 09:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


:Regrettably I think that is fully justified. It seems that ] is a new user who may be unaware of Misplaced Pages's guidelines and policies. But they are obviously very interested in Carr and are enthusiastic in trying to improve this article. I hope they can adjust/moderate their approach and will call upon fellow editors for help. ] (]) 13:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC) ::If the only independent source for something happening is the Daily Mail, it is rather an indication that it isn't that significant, I'd have to suggest. And the Mail says very little about Carr anyway. Articles aren't supposed to document every gig a comedian does, for charity or otherwise. ] (]) 10:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:::You don't think it's significant that a UK comedian has been asked to host a US charity show, headed by Springsteen and televised? What would your yardstick be? ] (]) 10:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:Hello. Few questions...
::::My yardstick is basically Misplaced Pages's, per ]. 'Significance' is determined by level of coverage in sources, not by our own personal opinions. And it seems rather unlikely that the DM would have covered this event if it wasn't for the involvement of Prince Harry. That's what their piece is about. Carr just gets mentioned in passing. ] (]) 10:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:With the Podcast area someone put a list of half a dozen on, in no order, and I'd just tidied them up and put the biggest ones on from the last 12 months (no where close to how many he did). Not sure why that is wrong as Podcasts now are the TV shows of our day? Joe Rogan gets MILLIONS more views than any other show on TV.
:::::Well it was covered by plenty of other outlets - but outside the UK. As I've mentioned before - I look for sources that the most people would be able to read. And you are the 1st person to call into question the inclusion of the actual event, rather than just the source citation. And the Woodruff site only mentioned Carr, had his picture first, and no mention of Harry - why not mention that? (playing Devil's Advocate right back at you).
:Interviews with Carr were being used by earlier citations that were broken - albeit they were sometimes being reported by newspapers. I've just looked up more recent ones on Podcasts, to make them authoritative (where it is comments about him personally).
:::::From the perspective of "significance" - how many Brits do you know (apart from Gervais) who are asked to host US events? Or vice versa. It's really hard for comedians to make inroads on the opposite side of the world - which is what I meant by the yardstick, because you were suggesting that it was some run of the mill gig. My understanding is that SUFH is a big thing (as an event celebrating the military) - so it's not like it's just a bring and buy sale appearance.
:Ok on the Gervais one - I've got other sources I could use. Don't recall using Carr's own website - although previous editors had and the link was broken as the site had had a major overhaul recently.
:::::The thing I struggle with most on here is everything is so entirely subjective and one person can end up being the arbiter of right/wrong. Would feel much more democratic if there were a voting system.
:Style problems - I copied whatever was already in use for each section (?). I didn't like some of them myself...
:Let me know and I'll have a look later. ] (]) 13:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC) :::::Time for some tennis...will chat with you later. :o) ] (]) 12:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::It there are other sources, link them here, so we can discuss them. The Woodruff site isn't independent (and says very little about Carr anyway). As for your suggestion regarding votes, that isn't how Misplaced Pages works, and you aren't going to get long-established core policy changed by arguing about it on this talk page. ] (]) 13:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
:Hello again
:::::::Morning – apols for delay replying. First of all - I’ll retract my support for using that DM article as a citation (and avoid using them in the future). Happy to admit when I’m in the wrong and, having done some deep digging, it appears that the word “hosted” had crept into a couple of stories – of which the DM is the only one I can now retrieve.
:It looks like you have virtually rolled everything back though and actually put things back which are not true, re-ordered text that i had just made chronological and removed Awards that were correctly cited. Bit confused by some of the rejections and, without knowing the reason for each one, am likely to make the same mistakes again.
:::::::I’ve made note of the help pages related to sources, for future.
:Re @] (saying call on fellow editors) - not sure how that can work when i have a lot to correct? Volunteering?
:::::::My background is SEO and there have been some concerning things going on, since the introduction of AI. I use different browsers, search engines and VPN and it’s been so hard to relocate earlier finds that I’ve had to resort to dumping info into Word documents, for future reference.
:I'd looked at lots of pages, belonging to other comedians, and analysed what information had been accepted on theirs and some of the things that have just been rolled back I've seen elsewhere (and not recent edits).
:::::::Google updates this year, for example, at one point had me raising complaints with them for things like a search that told me there were 400 results and yet refused to show me more than 10. Year filters have gone completely haywire, search operators don’t seem to function as they did and the engines seem to be trying to anticipate AI telling us an answer, rather than showing links to all sites available.
:Just when i thought i was making progress :o))
:::::::On top of that many sites are begging for cash, cutting their output – or vanishing completely and taking their archive with them (example – 20 years gone in a flash).
:T ] (]) 13:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::These are no good for sources – but just to mention, in passing, that the other issue is that some sites are retrievable by search (via Carr’s name) – but then come up as “this event has passed” or a blanked page. Example – . And also . And returns several links promising the details of his performance – none of which work. Muddies the waters a bit when searching.
::Maybe just slow down a bit and wait for others to agree? But beware of being branded as a ]. And other comedian's pages may also be wrong.... and just overlooked. As Binksternet has pointed out, reliable '''secondary sources''' are probably the key to progress here. ] (]) 13:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::In no particular order below are some of the links for the SUFH event, which he performed a spot for (does “attended” not refer to audience members?).
:::Hmmmm - I won't be a WP:SPA (eventually) but have just had a few days to myself (I'm self employed and it's quiet time), it's been cold and wet and i was getting to grips with the interface. I was only doing a few edits a day and waiting to see if stuff got rolled back - but wasn't sure how long was long enough? I've got a note of all my edits (and more than one source for much of it) but need some guidance on what i can put back, because I am mystified as to why so much was removed. ] (]) 14:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::I read bio pages for other people on here and still think (you may disagree) that these events are important contextually. Americans that I speak to are incredibly appreciative of their military and, as the only Brit on the bill, he is appreciated – especially as a repeat supporter. But he’s never going to get the same column inches, in US stories, as Springsteen / Jon Stewart and so on.
::::Yes, "how long is long enough" is a bit indeterminate. You've always got the Talk page here if you're unsure on whether or how to add something. ] (]) 14:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::For now – I’ll replace the DM citation with Business Wire (the Associated Press story is a bit messy) but am also removing the 2024 reference as that page has vanished.
:::::Sorry - feeling a bit whiney today (dental work this morning) so this was just the icing on the cake! The cake i would struggle to eat right now... I was making edits to take my mind off my teeth.
:::::::2023:                               (Asbury Park Press)                          (info on here is more generic)                       (Hungary)      (images)     (2<sup>nd</sup> story)                     (2<sup>nd</sup> story)       
:::::I did ask someone re how to do the bullet points but everything else I figured out ok (except tone of voice, it would appear). I've been in IT for years and work in SEO.
:::::::2018:        (before)     (after)    (recycling Rolling Stone)                     (radio)          ] (]) 06:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::The other thing I just thought of was how quickly would you decide i was a WP:SPA? I've got years worth of info/knowledge on comedy (especially Carr) and music / certain IT topics - but my work ebbs and flows. I'm starting a new contract at the weekend and there are only so many hours a day i can sit down, without seizing up. So would possibly be less likely to do edits on here.
:::::If you are saying "slow down" and I can see a lot wrong with that page - i could be stuck on it for weeks. Especially as I spent probably 3 times as long offline, checking out sources.
:::::I did think when i first started making edits that i wished there was a positive step - as in someone approving. So that you know you can move on to another update. ] (]) 15:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::See ], even for root canal alas, but that can happen to all of us, I guess. People may be watching, people may not. So it's always best to ask explicitly first. Again, there's no hard and fast rule on ]: those editors are usually also edit warriors, which you appear not to be. ] (]) 15:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Crikey. That's one terrifying page... I'm not sure a couple of hours of distraction is therapy though...it was just more constructive than watching comedy videos. Have you got a page for "what to do when your expensive dental insurance doesn't cover an £800 root canal"?
:::::::I've just read the page about not biting newcomers - specifically un-deletion or arbitration on points. Would I have to raise each point as a discussion on here?
:::::::For example - the 2nd para of "personal life" says he has spoken of depression and this is not true and the citation quoted only uses the words "mental health". He has discussed this a lot and specifically says that Depression is a medical issue that is treated with pharmaceuticals and that he was just sad. Basically he's said many times that people conflate Sadness with Depression and shouldn't. So that para is completely the wrong way around.
:::::::Should I re-edit it or put a discussion on here, please? Or i could just go and stick my head in the oven. Either works for me right now. ] (]) 15:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::I'd raise an example question here. It saves on gas. ] (]) 15:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Quoting ] at a newbie seems a bit OTT, Martin! SecretSquirrel is right - ]! SecretSquirrel - ''some'' of the advice above is good. ] is the key thing. So, for example, absolutely re-write the paragraph on depression/mental health, sourcing it to where somebody writes about what Carr has said on the subject. And welcome to Misplaced Pages! ]<sup>]</sup> 15:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::Oh ok. Sorry if SecretSquirrel feels bitten by me. I'll leave it to you folks. ] (]) 15:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::Thank you!
::::::::::Actually it wasn't Martin i meant - it was having 4 days of edits dumped when I'm sure they can't ALL have been bad. I'm just trying to figure out how to get the stuff out of this page that is wrong and bring it up to date.
::::::::::I've just added a reply to someone else's discussion on here re YouTube as a source. Carr (and most other of the biggest comedians) rarely gives "written" interviews any more as he's flying around the world with an insane schedule (you only have to watch his feed on X to see).
::::::::::I am 100% i won't find that in writing so my only other option would be to remove that line completely as whoever put it there has misinterpreted what the original article said (it only mentioned mental health, not depression).
::::::::::Maybe i should start a blog as "Bonkers Bunny" and then source myself ((joking)) ] (]) 15:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::{{small|Me and Binkster are ] really. A bit like ], I've always thought... ] (]) 15:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)}}
::::::::::::So you're ganing up on me, is that it?
::::::::::::I need emojis on here...so you can tell when I'm joking ] (]) 16:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::ganGing ] (]) 16:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::Likewise. That was the last thing I was attempting. Please mentally attach {{FBDB}} to most of my comments above, but especially the last one. ] (]) 16:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::I'm a woman on the edge today...beware! I'm raising questions all over the place. Going to regret this, methinks ] (]) 16:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Thx - done! ] (]) 15:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::The quickest fix is to mention Carr's works factually in chron order and not apply a dramatic arc. ] (]) 16:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::I'm a dramatic person though... (kidding). I think the problem for me is I can't see what on earth was wrong with some of the infor - see the questions that I've just raised here.
:::I was trying hard to not nuke text that other people had previously added - but it's tricky when it's kind of off enough to need a full rewrite. ] (]) 16:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


== Can't use youtube as a source? == == 1 child or 2? ==


Hello
Hi, I had a question about an edit I made which was reverted (@]) because it used YouTube as a source.


Anonymous accounts keep changing the panel on here to say "1 child" and then it goes back to 2...and now it's back to 1 again. It's DEF 2. See the first minute of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdswrDtMISc&t=11s and if you Google, around April time, there was a flurry of stories around the press "contacting his reps for comment" etc.
I understand if it was a video summarising an academic study, for example. But this is a direct recording of what Carr said, it's unclear to me why a video of someone speaking is not reliable account of their thoughts (assuming reliability is the issue)?


He's been talking about having had a 2nd child, in his gigs and podcasts, for ages and also in his Natural Born Killer special there was a routine around him talking to his son and daughter.
I'm fairly new to editing and I'm not disputing this - I'm sure I was in the wrong - just looking for clarity for future reference.


Thank you ] (]) 15:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC) So 2 is the answer. :o)) ] (]) 09:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)


:]. ] (]) 10:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
:I've got the same question. Artists are far more likely to be interviewed in a podcast than a newspaper.
::The YT video - where he says "kids". Are his own words not reliable enough? Or Natural Born Killer? I can't link to the latter as it's on Netflix.
:For example - when Carr travelled to Australia he had 7 hours flight some days, moving to the next city. Artists in this instance find it easier to jump on podcasts (sometimes from hotel rooms) than to have to be at a radio station for a specific time.
::He didn't talk about his 1st child for 18 months so has a history of keeping his private life private and only really confirmed it when he published his book.
:But I'm not sure why it makes the information any less valid? ] (]) 15:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::Personally - I give up. But this panel keeps getting changed back and forth repeatedly, mainly by anon accounts, because everyone that goes to his gigs (or watches him in Videos) know he's got "kids". Give it a week or two and someone will try and put it back to 2 again. ] (]) 10:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
:::A comedy show is not a reliable source. Surely you can understand why? ] (]) 10:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)


== Canada ==
::It's quite possibly true that Misplaced Pages policy on the use of sources like podcasts and YT videos needs some updating. But, policies and guidelines are agreed on a site-wide basis, and the best place to discuss any issues may well be ''']''' - rather than on this page. ] (]) 15:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Thank you - I've raised a discussion (not sure how to link it here)
:::Newbie2 ] (]) 16:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


Background, explanations – and some questions…
== Personal life - removing inaccurate information/depression ==


I collected the bulk of this information about a year ago and realised recently, as a result of reading about another story, that some of the websites have since vanished. I’ve had to spend a considerable amount of time re-checking the sources and then re-doing many of the searches and downloading the text for future reference. So, please go gentle on me, when critiquing my text!
I've had a bunch of edits rolled back and need some guidance, please.


I’m slotting it in between Edinburgh and America. Carr went to Edinburgh first – then JFL / Canada and then, a few months later, was on Conan. So that order makes more sense – even if they then all criss-cross each other.
For example - the 2nd para of "personal life" says he has spoken of depression and this is not true and the citation quoted only uses the words "mental health". He has discussed this a lot (in podcasts) and specifically says that Depression is a medical issue that is treated with pharmaceuticals and that he was just sad. Basically he's said many times that people conflate Sadness with Depression and shouldn't. So that para is completely the wrong way around. ] (]) 15:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


Some shows / appearances I managed to find multiple references for but, as its Canada, someone Canadian may have to let me know if I’ve chosen a lower-grade website option (drop me a chat and we can discuss what other links I may have).
::Here's a source saying he had 'bouts of depression': https://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/74912824/jimmy-carr-talks-religion-war-and-ribald-jokes-before-his-nz-tour


Sometimes my choice has been driven by the quality of the text. 2018 for example – I chose a link because the article said this was his 13<sup>th</sup> JFL – when it was in fact his 14<sup>th</sup>. In this instance I think the Montreal Gazette is generally a good option – but many of its more recent pages are now behind a paywall. BTW - Carr himself loses track of how many he’s attended as he said – when it was actually his 17<sup>th</sup>.
::He talks more about his mental health and and . The previous sentence, which read: "Carr has spoken of the ] he experienced in his 20s, while working in marketing, and credits his decision to pursue a comedy career in helping him to cope with depression", was removed ] (]) 21:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
:::Hello, good morning. The thing i was trying to be more clear about is, more recently (past couple of years) he's talked about the epidemic of male suicide and depression (and supported charities) and tried to be clearer about the distinction between sadness (which is how he felt when he left his job) and depression. Also, the original citation used only said "mental health" - so, at the very least, a diff citation was needed (preferably a more recent one).
:::BTW - That first link (religion, war and ribald jokes) has no mention of "bouts of depression" in it? I may not be awake yet - but have read it 3 times. :o))
:::Podcast chats are where he's been clearest and although he's been a teeny bit fast and loose with the terms at times (saying he can white knuckle through it) he mostly is very clear that depression is a long term disease that requires medication - and he takes nothing for it. Even after the tax thing (when he thought he'd lost everything) - his Dr gave him meds and he never took them.
:::His '''Diary of a CEO''' pod may be a good one as it's in chapters and has one on mental health (should only take you 5 mins to listen). I'm always happier to listening to someone explain themselves, rather than the interpretation of a journo. I think when you stagger off a long-haul flight and into an interview even the best of us may fluff a line or two.
:::I suppose where I'm coming from, too, is that I had a depressed parent (lifelong meds) and I also like to keep my language "clean" about the difference between the real "black dog" - and the ups and downs of coping with deaths and the problems of life. My situation probably means I honed in on those mentions more.
:::Does that make sense? ] (]) 06:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
::::I was just offering some sources, thanks. ], in that 2017 ''The Independent'' piece, agrees with him that "Not everyone who claims to be suffering from depression actually is – some of us are just sad", despite his annoying comments BBC Radio 4's '']''. ] (]) 09:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::The problem i often see is I listen to a podcast (all kinds of people) and it gets into the news, for some reason, and a teeny, subtle change of a word completely changes the context. Usually to make it more clickbait-y.
:::::And every time there is a joke controversy (usually Carr or Gervais or Chappelle) the press declare "fans were outraged" - when usually it's 3 people on X who don't like comedy and weren't at the show anyway. ] (]) 15:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::Podcast issues aside, do you think something needs to be added about Carr's mental health/ depression/ feelings of sadness? Thanks. ] (]) 15:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::::If you think it's a good idea I could cobble something together. Might be worth waiting a couple of weeks as Triggernometry said last week that they had recorded a new pod (and it's not been released yet) and another podcaster tweeted how excited he was to be "going down to London" for a record. I'm guessing that they will poss come out when the new Netflix Special drops. Or the 2 he's already done on Neal Brennan's Blocks were very interesting, talking about insecurity about looks/weight and their childhoods. Neal has had real depression and tried all kinds of meds. ] (]) 09:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::::By all means go ahead, although I think there may already be enough material in sources other than his podcasts. Not sure how ] fits in. ] (]) 11:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Sorry - missed this - bit busy with work. NB is a good friend of JC and has been on meds for 20+ years. There is a scary clip of him having ECT treatment. He's now (finally) getting relief from ayahuasca, apparently. I just thought that might be a good one to use as they get the topic in some depth (will have to re-watch it sometime). ] (]) 08:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::... "a scary clip of him having ECT treatment"? Really? ] (]) 08:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::Yeah - it's in one of the Blocks podcasts he did with JC. You know someone has bad depression when they are desperate enough to try that. ] (]) 09:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::That sounds quite significant. This must have been mentioned by ] elsewhere? ] (]) 09:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Sorry - i'm coming out of a migraine and not making much sense. Was I clear that I meant that it was Neal who had ECT? I'm so dopey i almost typed ECG earlier...should probably step away from the keyboard. ] (]) 09:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::No worries. Best discussed at ], I guess. ] (]) 09:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::I've given it a go - what do you think? I started the citation link from the point where he started to discuss ayahuasca. As his Blocks podcast was not mentioned (it's a year old) I added that section first. ] (]) 14:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::He's not really on my watchlist, sorry. But will try and have a look. ] (]) 15:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


The Gazette is also a problem for 2002-3 as its pre 2004 online archive has been dumped – (although the Shecky magazine references its earlier content).
== Magik - how can I disprove? ==


Could someone please advise me on whether a published book is counted as a “self published source”? I wasn’t clear after reading the Wiki help text. Reason being that, in Carr’s , he talks about how “the comedy myth is that you go to JFL and become a hit in the States” – but that had actually happened to him, in 2002, when he was subsequently invited to go to New York to do Conan. Can I use that? It’s an important leap in his career trajectory.
Under Filmography it says "2016 - Magik - Jacob (voice)". I've removed this once and had it undone - but how can i prove that he was NOT in this film? Wherever this information originally came from it has spread like bindweed around the web and I've already removed it from several places - after emailing his Management company (info account) and having it confirmed. Can I take it back off again? ] (]) 16:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


I’ve done my best to cut the word count down so where, for example, I say that Montreal WAS the world’s largest comedy festival – I didn’t want to repeat all of the details around its financial demise in the 2020s (which I have expanded on further down the text). Does this make sense? ComediHa! Are trying to rebuild the brand but that info belongs on the official JFL page.
:Basically, ''all'' content needs to be verifiable if challenged, and can be removed if there is no citation/reference. So yes, this can be removed. What we can't do is use something his management company replies with - that would be ]. Bear in mind, if there ''is'' a reliable source to back something up, it can stay - even if it's wrong! But iMDB - like any user-generated content site - is not a reliable source. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::I removed it once and the little devil bounced back again!! It's basically on "user contributed databases" all over the place (and I think it is on a South African Wiki too). It just WILL not die.
::Re the management company statement - I just said "i can find no concrete evidence that he was in that film, or that it's even been released. Was he?" and I got back a "NOPE" (paraphrasing). I just couldn't find where it had come from - but, whoever started it, it took on a life of its own. ] (]) 17:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


I have briefly mentioned Just pour rire and JFL, to drive search engines. I’ve Capitalised the 3 words Just For Laughs, even though Word etc. want the FOR to be lower case. NO ONE can make their mind up, from what I can see, as to which is right, and HaHaHa.com (the original, official website) frequently used JUST FOR LAUGHS. Just to confuse things the new owners () have used Just for laughs. I give up.
== Podcast links ==


2003 I mentioned that he was (again) erroneously listed as being in the Irish shows as I can find zero evidence that he was in them. Many times the listings of who would do what shows (which came out around April-July each year) did not evolve into actual appearances. I’ve spent a lot of time trying to prove/disprove each one.
This page has a Podcasts section with a handful of shows linked. I replaced that text with a table with 12 podcasts on from UK/USA and Aus, which has been rejected.


2003 I deliberately left the Leno show in the Stand Up section as the “TV” section relates to shows that came out of Canadian JFL TV productions.
What is acceptable for something like this, please? Several of the ones I'd added have MILLIONS of listenets (one being Joe Rogan) and, to some extent, podcasts are more important than some TV appearances.


2006 (and others) – I’ve named other comics involved in shows (mainly where they are bigger names) otherwise it’s a bit boring if it’s solely details of each year Carr attended. It also shows how many of the current most successful comedians have know each other for 20+ years.
Most of the ones I added were from the past 12 months - one of the older ones was Diary of a CEO which has had 1.6m views on YouTube and has also been shown on the BBC. Those kinds of numbers are a big deal for any artist - so does anyone have opinions on what is acceptable? ] (]) 16:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


2014 this counts as a JFL appearance because there are photos, on various social accounts, of him at numerous different shows. Unfortunately, they are not great sources for citations as some are just posts from audience members or mentions on Reddit that he “was great last night at xxx”.
:Misplaced Pages is probably waiting for a peer-reviewed 10-year meta-study in the ''International Journal of Podcast Studies'' before anything like that could be considered. ] (]) 16:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::Huge market. ] (]) 16:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::{{small|Yes, published by anorak-cellarnurds.uk. Well worth the $299 annual subscription. ] (]) 11:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)}}


2017 is sparse on links because it was a 375<sup>th</sup> Montreal anniversary, which drew all the press. 2022 was another year with poor quality news coverage.
== Comedy Specials ==


2018 Kill Tony is a big name in the Americas (see under ]).
There is a table (under Comedy Specials) which i added a Role column to (as each one varies re roles of Writer, Exec Producer, Associate producer etc.). This has been removed and I'm not sure why?


2021 I held back on something I was going to type about how pandemic restrictions (which went through to ) meant that 2021 was a festival bill consisting of all US / Canadian comics as the comics either couldn’t travel or didn’t want to risk it, due to rules changing at the last moment. It’s one of those things that we all “know” – but I couldn’t find an article as a citation.
I also added "Bill Burr Presents Friends Who Kill" (Netflix Special) and this is apparently also not acceptable.


2024 I’ve repositioned some text about the Jim Jefferies double-headliner tour. I’ve used an Instagram post as, although there are plenty of mentions of the JJ tour around the web, I’ve found that tour related info often gets deleted fairly quickly.
Help! ] (]) 16:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


== Filmography ==


'''Canadian TV'''
I added the 2 items below to the Filmography table and they were both removed. Can anyone tell me why, please?


2010 All Star Gala was listed on (depending on which route you enter the website – it sometimes says “not available”) so I have avoided using that (but I also chose the link for the poster).
- 1999 The Colour Of Funny - Writer


2015 The Nasty Show and Roast Invitational text could just have easily have been up in the Stand Up listings, above. I didn’t want to repeat the info in both places – is this best practice?
- 2024 Fackham Hall - Writer, Executive Producer


(I think I cited Chortle for the latter - but this one would also work https://www.comedy.co.uk/film/fackham-hall/) ] (]) 16:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


'''Canadian Charities'''
== Radio ==


Re Hope & Cope – I had downloaded the PDF documenting his 2012 appearance – but this has now been deleted (from the Hope & Cope website). However, the Gazette story mentions that 2019 is his 4<sup>th</sup> appearance – which aligns with 2012, 2015 and 2017 being the first three. ] (]) 10:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
I added the text below to the radio section and it was rejected. Can anyone tell me why, please?


:It seems overtly detailed, and the lack of references is going to be its downfall. We also don't need to link Just for Laughs in each paragraph. ] (]) 11:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Carr has appeared on BBC Radio 4's ] a total of 7 times, since 2011. He was the Museum Curator (in his 5 appearances in 2012) and a guest on the 2018 Annual Stock Take Christmas special, alongside ], ] and ]. ] (]) 16:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::There are even more JFL links now? Holy smokes, it’s a tough read. ] (]) 12:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
:::Sorry - I had my email off - took me 3 hours to do that upload.... A lot of the Citations failed (numbers in URL etc.) so I had to do them manually. Not sure what you mean by "overly detailed"? Examples?
:::I thought, in other pages that I read, things, that had Wiki pages, were always linked in each para...
:::Need to go and get some food - have a look now it's all up and I'll be back later. ] (]) 13:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)


== Podcasts ==
:Did you have any sources for all those claims? BBC episodes are usually easy to source. Thanks. ] (]) 16:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::Yes. I might have used https://www.comedy.co.uk/radio/museum_curiosity/episodes/ because it's all gathered in one place. On the BBC site there are 72 episodes and so referencing ONE person amongst them is tricky https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00k3wvk/episodes/player ] (]) 16:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::: might be better? ] (]) 16:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::::I don't know. Don't mind either way. ] (]) 16:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::have added and linked to BCG as suggested ] (]) 16:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


I feel bad about re-writing someone else’s work but the Podcasts section had an error in that the Frankie Boyle chat was 2010, when it was 2011 – see Jimmy and also FB’s Misplaced Pages page. And the link to Ivy.fm is dead so, as I’m in there, I’ll change it to Podchaser.
== Stand up comedy / Charity ==


Mention of the pandemic (being a reason for the ramping up) doesn’t make sense to me as, so far as I can see, he did (roughly) 1 podcast in 2019, 5 in 2020 and 27 in 2021. 2020 was a little higher rate than previous years and the first 4-5 pods of 2021 were recorded over Zoom – but then the rest of 2021’s “ramping up” was because 2021 was when he released his book () and he was all over radio and podcasts, sometimes multiple times a day – and often in person.
I had moved the first para down to the end (it's not currently chronological) and also moved one item down to "controversies". I was trying to prep to add more "important" milestones in such as supporting Dave Chappelle at the Hollywood Bowl and last week's gigs in India (something very few Western acts have done).


I would suggest that would have happened, regardless of the pandemic. It was just a business decision to move an international artist away from UK TV chat show circuit to a format that gave a much bigger audience.
Those "re-orders" have been returned - any ideas why?


But also, of the podcasts listed (in the original text) only Dane’s was recorded “during the pandemic”. The Comedian’s Comedian, for example, was recorded 11 Oct 2021 at one of JC’s gigs and the others were all 2022. You Made It Weird was on a stage, in Montreal, at Just For Laughs July 2022. So, describing them as “during the height of the pandemic” doesn’t really align, IMHO. Sorry to nitpick!
Also I was going to add a Charity section as there are a lot of events not mentioned and I thought it would look tidier - Princes Trust, Comic Relief, Queens Jubilee, Stand Up For Heroes (USA), Secret Policeman's Ball. Are Charity sections ok? All of these events he has performed at more than once - so it's not just a paragraph worth (have citations for all) ] (]) 16:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


The final part of my text about “everyone is jealous….” – that quote, if you Google, it, can be found on every social platform and also the LinkedIn profiles of some impressive people. I didn’t want to wax too lyrical about it – but it makes a change from seeing him being repeatedly quoted for a dodgy joke. ] (]) 13:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
== Awards ==


:I would ask you to hold off on adding anything else to the article. It isn't in fantastic shape currently thanks to recent edits, and adding anything else would create unnecessary extra work. ] (]) 13:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I lengthened the Awards list, as below, and they were bounced. Not sure why?
::Wasn't planning on anything else - but what do you think is wrong to make it "not in fantastic shape"? Genuinely asking...not trying to argue with you. :o) ] (]) 14:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
:::Too much to list here. Formatting errors, unreliable sources, duplicated wikilinks for starters. At this point you might as well continue, but expect a lot of your work to possibly be for nothing. ] (]) 14:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
::::Sorry for delay – business has been hectic. Re the duplicated wikilinks…I thought I’d be told off if I didn’t put them all in…lesson learned.
::::Proposition for you – how about, as some training for me, you tell me what wants fixing and I do it? Doesn’t have to be all at once. If we start with the Wikilinks – if you can confirm how many times each one needs adding then I could potentially tidy them up over this weekend.   ] (]) 09:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)


:I rolled the article back to before your contributions, because there were too many problems with ] and ]. The ] is too promotional. You cannot use Misplaced Pages's voice to praise Carr in such flattering terms as "introduced a new audience to the intelligence of the man behind the stage persona". This smacks of a public relations campaign. ] (]) 16:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

::Understood / links noted. The problem I had was the Podcasts section, as it is now, makes no sense. The bit about ramping up during COVID is (IMHO) not supported by evidence – mostly because not all of those shows were during that time.
The only ones i was not able to add citations for were the ones for Nuts magazine, because it went bust and the archive pages wouldn't link.
::I was trying to keep as much of the original submitters text as possible (because I know what it’s like to have your words chopped about) but, in the end, gave myself a headache trying to make it make sense and went a bit OTT. Honestly, I rewrote that last part about 15 times and, clearly, lost my way. ] (]) 09:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)


·        ] Nomination (2002)

·        ] Award: Best Stand Up (2003)

·        ] Award: Best On-Screen Newcomer (2003)

·        LAFTA Award: Best Stand Up (2004)

·        ] Nomination: Best Presenter, ''Distraction'' (2004)

·        LAFTA Award: Funniest Man (2005)

·         ] Nomination: Best Presenter, ''Distraction'' (2004)

·        LAFTA Award: Best Stand Up (2006)

·        ]: Best Live Stand Up (2006)

·        LAFTA Award: Funniest Man (2007)

·        LAFTA Award: Best Stand Up (2008)

·        Nuts Awards: Best Stand Up (2010)

·        LAFTA Award: Loaded Legend (2011)

·        Zoo Awards: Funniest Man (2011)

·        The LAFTAs: Funniest DVD for "''Being Funny''" (2012)

·        Nuts Awards: Funniest Comic (2014) ] (]) 16:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

:If the only evidence that someone won an award is the website of the organisation that bestowed it, that's a good indication that it's not sufficiently notable for inclusion. Only list significant awards that get reported by independent secondary media (and probably only ones that we have an article about, which is a good indication that the award itself is ]. ]] 09:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
::The only UK sites that tend to report this type of thing tend to be Comedy.co.uk (British Comedy Guide) and Chortle and I think my links were mostly to one or the other.
::Where I am struggling is where my citations seem to have been held to higher standards than others on the page. If you have a moment - if you look at the top Award on the page now (Time Out 2002 - which has been there for years, from what i can tell) the citation is pretty much nonsensical. I think this link would be better https://www.chortle.co.uk/comics/j/261/jimmy_carr/news - it's not perfect - but a 22 year old comedy story is mainly only on old pages like http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/3601272.stm or pages for after dinner speaker promos / his management's website.
::Should I change that one to Chortle? Do you view Chortle or the BCG as credible sources? Hoping so as they are all I've got.
::In this example link the BCG has more awards listed - but, ironically, not that one https://www.comedy.co.uk/people/jimmy_carr/ ] (]) 09:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:::It's not that you're being held to a higher standard, it's more like someone noticed what you were doing. Lots of our articles have dodgy sources (hell, someone of them have downright vandalism in them) simply because it's the encyclopaedia that anyone can edit - someone comes along, adds a dubious assertion supported by a ropey source, nobody notices, and it sits there for years. You have come along and made lots of significant changes, however, and you've asked about it on a well-attended help page, so people have noticed what you are doing, and are vetting your changes, that's all.
:::Now, as for the awards/sourcing, as I said if stuff isn't picked up in mainstream media, it probably isn't worth mentioning. A long list of awards that someone has won isn't, in my view, of any particular interest to the reader - it's the sort of puff that someone might put on their own CV or on their website, but I don't think our readership cares whether or not Carr won some award from 'Nuts' magazine. I'd probably just strip the awards back to the ones that we actually have articles about, those should be easy enough to source (and yes, that 22-year old BBC page would be fine). ]] 11:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
::::As a newbie it's a bit overwhelming how many help pages there are and so I also looked around the page(s) of a lot of other comedians for inspiration.
::::I am fine with guidance, honest....but so far (until i kicked off these specific questions) I'd only had a mass reject. Even though I'd done as suggested to me and made individual, small edits that could stand on their own.
::::Just for clarity though - I am an absolute stickler for accuracy - just not quite figured out how to apply it here yet.
::::I'll have a look at the awards list later. Walk time. ] (]) 11:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

== Awards, text ==

Re the below (which was rejected) - the 1st line I just reworded slightly (the poll name was slightly wrong) and moved down the page (from stand up) and the 2nd one I added new. Any thoughts, please?


In 2003, he was listed in ] as one of the 50 funniest acts in British comedy. In 2007, a poll on the ] website for 100 Funniest Stand-Ups of All Time, Jimmy Carr was 12th.

In 2022 TicketSource.co.uk looked at comedians, from both sides of the pond, to try and decide who was the most influential. They ranked them for estimated net worth, number of TV specials, Twitter (X) and Instagram followers, the cheapest ticket for their shows, number of Google searches and the average number of YouTube views their content gets. In the UK Jimmy Carr ranked number 1, just above ] (2<sup>nd</sup>) and ] (3<sup>rd</sup>).

Citation - https://www.ticketsource.co.uk/blog/the-worlds-most-influential-comedians ] (]) 16:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

:First of all, we should not be using informal phrases like 'the pond' - this is an encyclopaedia, are articles should be written in formal standard English. As for whether the stuff about ticketsource should be included, ask yourself whether the source is reliable. It is on ticketsource's blog. It has no byline. There is no indication that there was any editorial control, independent oversight or fact checking. Ticketsource is a commercial organisation that sells tickets for events; it is not any kind of authority about who is and is not 'influential'. YMMV, but that source looks ''to me'' like a bit of clickbait that was thrown together on the back of an envelope by an office intern who knows how to use Google, and should not be used to support any assertion in any article about any subject. ]] 09:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
::That is fine - that is the kind of direct feedback I'm looking for. I've written web copy (work and personal) for years and years but different industries /platforms have different language and I'm trying to settle mine. Thank you.
::Re Ticketsource as a story (playing Devil's Advocate) - the Sunday Times Rich List is on Misplaced Pages and this is the comedy version of that (it caused a kerfuffle among comedians who are sensitive bunch at times and highly competitive). From a comedy perspective I'm not sure it's any less valid than the awards voted for by the public. For every poll that votes 1 comic as their favourite - another one will hate them.
::Personally I don't think Rich Lists should be validated in the press or anywhere else as they are also clickbait and guesswork. I know people who know people and many of the figures are way, WAY out - and yet that list has a page all of its own.
::PS - had to look up YMMV. And kinda wish there were emojis on these discussion boards so I could show that I'm not having a rant here. ] (]) 10:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:::I'd say '']'' has far more traction/ general respect than does a ticketSource.co.uk blog. That's why it has a whole series of long-standing Misplaced Pages articles. You might have to spend more time explaining how the comedy result was calculated than there is value in giving the "result". It's much easier to count dollars than it is to count comedy? ] (]) 10:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:::Yes, this is nothing like the Sunday Times Rich List, except in the sense that they are both lists. One of them is written by a widely respected news organisation with a reputation for fact-checking, while the other is written by god-knows-whom for the blog section of a ticket vendor's website; they are not comparable. It would only be worth mentioning if independent secondary sources picked up on the story, for example if the BBC or the Guardian ran an article ''about'' the Ticketsource list - that would be an indicator that people other than ticketsource took their poll seriously. ]] 10:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

::::Agreed, we ''do'' need emojis! I mean, I nearly completely missed the sarcasm in Girth Summit's comment at first glance! "a widely respected news organisation with a reputation for fact-checking", for an organ of ]! Nicely played, GS, nicely played! ]<sup>]</sup> 11:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::Well, I didn't say the reputation was deserved... Seriously though, The Times and the Sunday Times are, according to ], considered 'generally reliable', and have been discussed often enough to warrant their own shortcut: ]. I don't believe that ticketsource enjoys the same level of standing here. ]] 11:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::Perhaps it does have more traction (and my tongue was firmly in my cheek) - but I still think it's a load of old... ] (]) 11:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::I was glad I wasn't drinking at the time or it would have been a keyboard needing a deep clean. ] (]) 11:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
::::BBC or Guardian....those bastions of truth and accuracy! (i need emojis....).
::::I think that Ticketsource thing has a value in, some ways, of showing how our culture changes. The comedians on there understand how to use Social Media (and Netflix) and are trailblazing how to build a huge career. There are marketing businesses that study Kevin Hart's methods, for example. ] (]) 11:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::As Girth Summit says, we are stuck with ]. If your political scruples don't allow you countenance such sources, WP may not be the place for you, alas. ] (]) 11:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
::::::Not sure how you got there, Martin. I didn't mention politics and was merely carrying on the joke from ] . Perhaps it's not the place for him either???
::::::My slant is very much that the Guardian LOVES Stewart Lee and very few other comedians. Some of the comedy articles on there have been shockingly bad. But from the perspective of FACTS, not politics.
::::::But my main problem with using those papers for sources is that they are behind paywalls.
::::::Which I suppose is another question - where there is a choice, is it better to choose sources that are open? ] (]) 11:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::::The main consideration should always be is the source ''reliable''. Assuming it is, then it's somewhat better to have a source that isn't behind a paywall, but that's very much a secondary consideration. Sources don't even have to be online; books, old (pre-internet) magazines, etc., are all still very much ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 12:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
::::::::I'm a stickler for facts and accuracy so I would always hesitate to use a source that I haven't been able to read and so many of our papers are behind paywalls now. It's not like you can trust the clickbait-ified links either.
::::::::I am making a note of all the advice you are giving me, btw. But it's month end and i really should get my head back into a spreadsheet! :o)) ] (]) 13:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::::e/c How did I get there, Secret? Possibly because, yes, you need emojis. (They are available if you search...) I always try to use accessible free sources, but officially WP seems to have no preference - we even still use those archaic sources called ]. But by all means, go ahead and root out any ''Grauniad'' mis-truths over at ]. ] (]) 12:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
::::::::Are they? Will have to look - but supposed to be doing some admin.
::::::::I think to bore on about the original topic (because i thought about it on a walk) - I don't "like" the Rich List because they look at income and then pretty much make a guess (I know it's a bit more involved than that). But with comedians / singers etc., they look at how many gigs they have done and what the ticket prices are and work out what they think the person has earned. But they cannot know for certain what they are worth as they don't know how much they have spent / lost in bad investments / given away etc. And I doubt anyone corrects them.
::::::::So they pretty much do the same thing as TicketSource. Data mine publicly available information and publish an opinion, dressed up as facts. IMHO. :o) ] (]) 13:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

== Tours ==

Another rejected edit of mine...I added a column to the Tours table to indicate which DVD / Netflix special applied to each one. What i was hoping to then do (but never got chance) was take that "noise" from the Stand up section.

So, instead of having things like "Carr's sixth Live DVD, ''Jimmy Carr: Making People Laugh'', was released on 8 November 2010" - I had just added "Making People Laugh" on the row for "Rapier Wit" as I thought this would make the page tidier...especially as I have some more tour related text I would like to add in.

It does partially repeat the Titles in "Comedy specials" but I didn't want to make 1 massively wide table (by combining the 2) as I'm sure it will look horrible on a mobile device.

And currently what is in the tables - is repeated up in the text.

Thoughts? ] (]) 17:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

== Television ==

I have also had bounced a table row for "2005-2006 Distraction - Presenter - Comedy Central (USA)" - linked to Comedy Central. I felt this warranted it's own row because, although the same show format, it was a whole new production crew/company and had moved from the UK to USA.

And another row that was removed "2024 Battle In The Box - Host - Dave" https://www.comedy.co.uk/tv/battle-in-the-box/ which I think has already been filmed but just not scheduled yet.

ANy idea why this vanished, please? ] (]) 17:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

== Edinburgh ==

I’ve just added a new section (under '''Stand-up comedy''') for Edinburgh – to summarise Carr’s appearances at the annual Festival. Really, really hoping that this passes muster and doesn’t get nuked – can anyone see any tweaks that are necessary, please?

I extracted this info from some broader research, on comedy festivals, that I’ve been doing for someone else’s project and have tried to convey how important this festival was to his career. And the room/venue sizes are mentioned to try and demonstrate how he moved up a gear each time he returned. Ditto the mention of TV shows – indicating audience growth.

And the 2007 mention of The Guardian attitude change was indicative of a wider backlash against big names. Some think only people like Sadowitz should be promoted – others acknowledge that a “name” at the EICC draws punters in, which is better for everyone. I suspect this debate played a part in 2014 being his last attendance, but couldn’t find a specific reference to it.

I know that, in the early years, many of our (now) big-name comedians drove up there together and have talked about the bonding process of chatting in the car / dossing down in each other’s rented flats, running around seeing shows and then eating takeaways. I just can’t find the interviews right now – but may add to the relevant people’s pages when I do (if it adds value). I’ve got a LOT of information.

I just called it “Edinburgh”, btw, because the TV festival is also mentioned in there.

Question about the 3<sup>rd</sup> paragraph in the current Stand-up section – should I eventually move that down to a chronological spot within “Edinburgh”? I moved a paragraph once previously and the change was rejected.

Paragraph 5 – the final line is a repeat of my Edinburgh info (if it gets passed). Should it stay?

And also the 7<sup>th</sup> paragraph says that Rapier Wit “….tour opened on 20 August 2009 with nine shows at the Edinburgh Festival”. That citation 46 (which will probably renumber when I add my stuff)

1.     ''. Ents24.com. from the original on 4 January 2011. Retrieved 10 March 2011.''


is now dead and the official Edinburgh programme said it was 8 shows. Shall I wait to see what you peeps say before altering/removing that?

Nervously waiting for approval…worse than being at school! ] (]) 11:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:24, 14 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jimmy Carr article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconBuckinghamshire (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire
WikiProject iconComedy High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLondon Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRadio Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconTelevision
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

America

Trying to use search engines for research is very difficult lately as the algorithms push you towards what they THINK you are looking for, regardless of how many search operators etc. you use. Which means, while researching the Edinburgh information I had to use really broad search terms, only restricted by date filters.

Although an annoyance – it meant that I’ve collected a LOT of information on other un-related people, gigs and events. Much of which will probably now have to wait until the Winter for me to sort through (chores to do and all that).

Despite making so many trips Stateside (virtually once or twice a year) there are very few press reports. UK MSM are not interested (unless it’s a “cancel x person for a joke” story) and BCG / Chortle appear to be pretty much run on a shoe string and so rely on being fed stories. We don’t celebrate our UK comedy scene enough!!

The LA Comedy Store, for example, is legendary (to comedians and comedy fans) as the place that developed everyone from Richard Pryor to Robin Williams to Jim Carrey. As an Alumnus of the club (a rare honour, to be bestowed upon a Brit) Carr can turn up any time he’s in town and just perform. But finding an official record is tricky – so I’ve had to leave it a bit vague and have left many appearances out (not sure the Misplaced Pages guidelines would accept single tweets from punters).

Where I’ve felt it’s important to note an appearance I’ve used, for example, the X account of the official Comedy Store, so that it’s not just some random user who might have their account removed. Is that acceptable?

Although I would imagine some would think that listing too many TV shows is trying to turn this into IMDB – my perspective is that the American late-night shows give massive exposure and a Brit artist getting repeated invites to these shows is a huge career boost. There are many, many more shows he has appeared on – these are just the biggies.

I’ve highlighted Netflix a fair bit as he seems to be well regarded and “plays nicely” with other comedians – hence his collaborations. Again – there are many more that I couldn’t find citations for, where has worked with / supported other US stars.

The one thing that I think someone may “object” to is the section main title “America” then covering TV and stand up, which doesn’t fit the format of the paragraphs above.

A lot of work has gone into this so, if anyone is unhappy, can we please talk about it, rather than just nuke the lot…always nervous about doing a big update. And it’s heartbreaking when something gets removed without warning. Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 13:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

SUFH 2023 _ Daily Mail Citation

Hello @Davidgerard

I would like to restore my citation (2023 SUFH – Daily Mail) and so am launching this discussion.

One of the things that I find frustrating about editing Misplaced Pages is how different people have such differing opinions (of how to apply the rules) and so, months after editing something, one person can decide that it doesn’t fit somehow and you are back at square 1 and having to dig out old notes.

I’m assuming you think the DM is an “unreliable tabloid” but in this instance it’s a properly reported story of a charity event, that occurred in a different country. With regard to this particular type of event – why would something be more legitimate if it was in the Grauniad? (or similar).

As it’s a British Comedian at a US event it didn’t get a lot of coverage and this was the BEST overview I could find. And when I say the best – it’s getting harder and harder to find stories that are not behind a paywall and, as more MSM websites struggle financially, this is only going to get worse. I always try and find something that everyone can read and that delivers all the facts.

With this event there is a link that I could use, from the Bob Woodruff Foundation, that says who was GOING to be there – but I thought a story, written after the event, that had proof and pictures was more appropriate.

Regardless of who is behind the URL – should accuracy and photographs not count for something? I get why there is an overall feeling that tabloids are to be avoided – but isn’t it a little knee jerk to just see “Daily Mail” and reject, without actually looking at the content?

Can we talk?        :o)) Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 06:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Talking to myself (I find I get more sense this way!)... I've put the DM link back in as, apart from photos on places like Getty images, the only other really visible information was the announcement on the Woodruff Foundation site (which I've also added).
As mentioned above - I have inserted both as the Woodruff link was only announcing the "intent" for him to host, whereas the DM story is confirmation that it really happened. I think having both completes the circle. Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 09:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
If the only independent source for something happening is the Daily Mail, it is rather an indication that it isn't that significant, I'd have to suggest. And the Mail says very little about Carr anyway. Articles aren't supposed to document every gig a comedian does, for charity or otherwise. AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
You don't think it's significant that a UK comedian has been asked to host a US charity show, headed by Springsteen and televised? What would your yardstick be? Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 10:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
My yardstick is basically Misplaced Pages's, per WP:DUE. 'Significance' is determined by level of coverage in sources, not by our own personal opinions. And it seems rather unlikely that the DM would have covered this event if it wasn't for the involvement of Prince Harry. That's what their piece is about. Carr just gets mentioned in passing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Well it was covered by plenty of other outlets - but outside the UK. As I've mentioned before - I look for sources that the most people would be able to read. And you are the 1st person to call into question the inclusion of the actual event, rather than just the source citation. And the Woodruff site only mentioned Carr, had his picture first, and no mention of Harry - why not mention that? (playing Devil's Advocate right back at you).
From the perspective of "significance" - how many Brits do you know (apart from Gervais) who are asked to host US events? Or vice versa. It's really hard for comedians to make inroads on the opposite side of the world - which is what I meant by the yardstick, because you were suggesting that it was some run of the mill gig. My understanding is that SUFH is a big thing (as an event celebrating the military) - so it's not like it's just a bring and buy sale appearance.
The thing I struggle with most on here is everything is so entirely subjective and one person can end up being the arbiter of right/wrong. Would feel much more democratic if there were a voting system.
Time for some tennis...will chat with you later. :o) Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 12:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
It there are other sources, link them here, so we can discuss them. The Woodruff site isn't independent (and says very little about Carr anyway). As for your suggestion regarding votes, that isn't how Misplaced Pages works, and you aren't going to get long-established core policy changed by arguing about it on this talk page. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Morning – apols for delay replying. First of all - I’ll retract my support for using that DM article as a citation (and avoid using them in the future). Happy to admit when I’m in the wrong and, having done some deep digging, it appears that the word “hosted” had crept into a couple of stories – of which the DM is the only one I can now retrieve.
I’ve made note of the help pages related to sources, for future.
My background is SEO and there have been some concerning things going on, since the introduction of AI. I use different browsers, search engines and VPN and it’s been so hard to relocate earlier finds that I’ve had to resort to dumping info into Word documents, for future reference.
Google updates this year, for example, at one point had me raising complaints with them for things like a search that told me there were 400 results and yet refused to show me more than 10. Year filters have gone completely haywire, search operators don’t seem to function as they did and the engines seem to be trying to anticipate AI telling us an answer, rather than showing links to all sites available.
On top of that many sites are begging for cash, cutting their output – or vanishing completely and taking their archive with them (example MTV news – 20 years gone in a flash).
These are no good for sources – but just to mention, in passing, that the other issue is that some sites are retrievable by search (via Carr’s name) – but then come up as “this event has passed” or a blanked page. Example – Lincoln Center. And also New York Comedy Festival. And The Guardian returns several links promising the details of his performance – none of which work. Muddies the waters a bit when searching.
In no particular order below are some of the links for the SUFH event, which he performed a spot for (does “attended” not refer to audience members?).
I read bio pages for other people on here and still think (you may disagree) that these events are important contextually. Americans that I speak to are incredibly appreciative of their military and, as the only Brit on the bill, he is appreciated – especially as a repeat supporter. But he’s never going to get the same column inches, in US stories, as Springsteen / Jon Stewart and so on.
For now – I’ll replace the DM citation with Business Wire (the Associated Press story is a bit messy) but am also removing the 2024 reference as that page has vanished.
2023: Woodruff Foundation     Pollstar     Deadline     Variety     Business Wire      800 Pound Gorilla Media     Getty Images     App.com (Asbury Park Press)    Billboard     Woodruff Foundation on YT     Good Sense Company      Independent UK     App.com (2 story)   David Clark Cause (info on here is more generic)    American Songwriter     Jambase   Ambassador Images     Forbes    Look To The Stars     Glix Agency (Hungary)    Associated Press News   Alamy (images)     Billboard (2 story)    Woodruff on Instagram     New Jersey Arts      Chortle     Jersey Evening Post    Daily Mail (2 story)    WBAL News Radio    
2018: ABC News    Forbes    Rolling Stone (before)    Rolling Stone (after)    Woodruff Foundation (recycling Rolling Stone) Globe Newswire     Variety     Madison Square Garden     Brooklyn Vegan     Alamy     WFRD (radio)    Good Morning America      Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 06:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

1 child or 2?

Hello

Anonymous accounts keep changing the panel on here to say "1 child" and then it goes back to 2...and now it's back to 1 again. It's DEF 2. See the first minute of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdswrDtMISc&t=11s and if you Google, around April time, there was a flurry of stories around the press "contacting his reps for comment" etc.

He's been talking about having had a 2nd child, in his gigs and podcasts, for ages and also in his Natural Born Killer special there was a routine around him talking to his son and daughter.

So 2 is the answer. :o)) Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 09:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

WP:RELIABLESOURCES. Seasider53 (talk) 10:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
The YT video - where he says "kids". Are his own words not reliable enough? Or Natural Born Killer? I can't link to the latter as it's on Netflix.
He didn't talk about his 1st child for 18 months so has a history of keeping his private life private and only really confirmed it when he published his book.
Personally - I give up. But this panel keeps getting changed back and forth repeatedly, mainly by anon accounts, because everyone that goes to his gigs (or watches him in Videos) know he's got "kids". Give it a week or two and someone will try and put it back to 2 again. Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 10:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
A comedy show is not a reliable source. Surely you can understand why? Seasider53 (talk) 10:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Canada

Background, explanations – and some questions…

I collected the bulk of this information about a year ago and realised recently, as a result of reading about another story, that some of the websites have since vanished. I’ve had to spend a considerable amount of time re-checking the sources and then re-doing many of the searches and downloading the text for future reference. So, please go gentle on me, when critiquing my text!

I’m slotting it in between Edinburgh and America. Carr went to Edinburgh first – then JFL / Canada and then, a few months later, was on Conan. So that order makes more sense – even if they then all criss-cross each other.

Some shows / appearances I managed to find multiple references for but, as its Canada, someone Canadian may have to let me know if I’ve chosen a lower-grade website option (drop me a chat and we can discuss what other links I may have).

Sometimes my choice has been driven by the quality of the text. 2018 for example – I chose a Montreal Gazette link because the Chortle article said this was his 13 JFL – when it was in fact his 14. In this instance I think the Montreal Gazette is generally a good option – but many of its more recent pages are now behind a paywall. BTW - Carr himself loses track of how many he’s attended as he said 2022 was his 15 – when it was actually his 17.

The Gazette is also a problem for 2002-3 as its pre 2004 online archive has been dumped – (although the Shecky magazine references its earlier content).

Could someone please advise me on whether a published book is counted as a “self published source”? I wasn’t clear after reading the Wiki help text. Reason being that, in Carr’s Before and Laughter, he talks about how “the comedy myth is that you go to JFL and become a hit in the States” – but that had actually happened to him, in 2002, when he was subsequently invited to go to New York to do Conan. Can I use that? It’s an important leap in his career trajectory.

I’ve done my best to cut the word count down so where, for example, I say that Montreal WAS the world’s largest comedy festival – I didn’t want to repeat all of the details around its financial demise in the 2020s (which I have expanded on further down the text). Does this make sense? ComediHa! Are trying to rebuild the brand but that info belongs on the official JFL page.

I have briefly mentioned Just pour rire and JFL, to drive search engines. I’ve Capitalised the 3 words Just For Laughs, even though Word etc. want the FOR to be lower case. NO ONE can make their mind up, from what I can see, as to which is right, and HaHaHa.com (the original, official website) frequently used JUST FOR LAUGHS. Just to confuse things the new owners (Comediha!) have used Just for laughs. I give up.

2003 I mentioned that he was (again) erroneously listed as being in the Irish shows as I can find zero evidence that he was in them. Many times the listings of who would do what shows (which came out around April-July each year) did not evolve into actual appearances. I’ve spent a lot of time trying to prove/disprove each one.

2003 I deliberately left the Leno show in the Stand Up section as the “TV” section relates to shows that came out of Canadian JFL TV productions.

2006 (and others) – I’ve named other comics involved in shows (mainly where they are bigger names) otherwise it’s a bit boring if it’s solely details of each year Carr attended. It also shows how many of the current most successful comedians have know each other for 20+ years.

2014 this counts as a JFL appearance because there are photos, on various social accounts, of him at numerous different shows. Unfortunately, they are not great sources for citations as some are just posts from audience members or mentions on Reddit that he “was great last night at xxx”.

2017 is sparse on links because it was a 375 Montreal anniversary, which drew all the press. 2022 was another year with poor quality news coverage.

2018 Kill Tony is a big name in the Americas (see under Tony Hinchcliffe).

2021 I held back on something I was going to type about how pandemic restrictions (which went through to 2022) meant that 2021 was a festival bill consisting of all US / Canadian comics as the comics either couldn’t travel or didn’t want to risk it, due to rules changing at the last moment. It’s one of those things that we all “know” – but I couldn’t find an article as a citation.

2024 I’ve repositioned some text about the Jim Jefferies double-headliner tour. I’ve used an Instagram post as, although there are plenty of mentions of the JJ tour around the web, I’ve found that tour related info often gets deleted fairly quickly.


Canadian TV

2010 All Star Gala was listed on Apple TV (depending on which route you enter the website – it sometimes says “not available”) so I have avoided using that (but I also chose the Tubi Tv link for the poster).

2015 The Nasty Show and Roast Invitational text could just have easily have been up in the Stand Up listings, above. I didn’t want to repeat the info in both places – is this best practice?


Canadian Charities

Re Hope & Cope – I had downloaded the PDF documenting his 2012 appearance – but this has now been deleted (from the Hope & Cope website). However, the Gazette story mentions that 2019 is his 4 appearance – which aligns with 2012, 2015 and 2017 being the first three. Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 10:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

It seems overtly detailed, and the lack of references is going to be its downfall. We also don't need to link Just for Laughs in each paragraph. Seasider53 (talk) 11:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
There are even more JFL links now? Holy smokes, it’s a tough read. Seasider53 (talk) 12:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Sorry - I had my email off - took me 3 hours to do that upload.... A lot of the Citations failed (numbers in URL etc.) so I had to do them manually. Not sure what you mean by "overly detailed"? Examples?
I thought, in other pages that I read, things, that had Wiki pages, were always linked in each para...
Need to go and get some food - have a look now it's all up and I'll be back later. Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 13:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Podcasts

I feel bad about re-writing someone else’s work but the Podcasts section had an error in that the Frankie Boyle chat was 2010, when it was 2011 – see Jimmy tweet and also FB’s Misplaced Pages page. And the link to Ivy.fm is dead so, as I’m in there, I’ll change it to Podchaser.

Mention of the pandemic (being a reason for the ramping up) doesn’t make sense to me as, so far as I can see, he did (roughly) 1 podcast in 2019, 5 in 2020 and 27 in 2021. 2020 was a little higher rate than previous years and the first 4-5 pods of 2021 were recorded over Zoom – but then the rest of 2021’s “ramping up” was because 2021 was when he released his book (Before & Laughter) and he was all over radio and podcasts, sometimes multiple times a day – and often in person.

I would suggest that would have happened, regardless of the pandemic. It was just a business decision to move an international artist away from UK TV chat show circuit to a format that gave a much bigger audience.

But also, of the podcasts listed (in the original text) only Dane’s was recorded “during the pandemic”. The Comedian’s Comedian, for example, was recorded 11 Oct 2021 at one of JC’s gigs and the others were all 2022. You Made It Weird was on a stage, in Montreal, at Just For Laughs July 2022. So, describing them as “during the height of the pandemic” doesn’t really align, IMHO. Sorry to nitpick!

The final part of my text about “everyone is jealous….” – that quote, if you Google, it, can be found on every social platform and also the LinkedIn profiles of some impressive people. I didn’t want to wax too lyrical about it – but it makes a change from seeing him being repeatedly quoted for a dodgy joke. Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 13:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

I would ask you to hold off on adding anything else to the article. It isn't in fantastic shape currently thanks to recent edits, and adding anything else would create unnecessary extra work. Seasider53 (talk) 13:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Wasn't planning on anything else - but what do you think is wrong to make it "not in fantastic shape"? Genuinely asking...not trying to argue with you. :o) Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Too much to list here. Formatting errors, unreliable sources, duplicated wikilinks for starters. At this point you might as well continue, but expect a lot of your work to possibly be for nothing. Seasider53 (talk) 14:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Sorry for delay – business has been hectic. Re the duplicated wikilinks…I thought I’d be told off if I didn’t put them all in…lesson learned.
Proposition for you – how about, as some training for me, you tell me what wants fixing and I do it? Doesn’t have to be all at once. If we start with the Wikilinks – if you can confirm how many times each one needs adding then I could potentially tidy them up over this weekend.   Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 09:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
I rolled the article back to before your contributions, because there were too many problems with WP:SYNTH and WP:PEACOCK. The WP:TONE is too promotional. You cannot use Misplaced Pages's voice to praise Carr in such flattering terms as "introduced a new audience to the intelligence of the man behind the stage persona". This smacks of a public relations campaign. Binksternet (talk) 16:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Understood / links noted. The problem I had was the Podcasts section, as it is now, makes no sense. The bit about ramping up during COVID is (IMHO) not supported by evidence – mostly because not all of those shows were during that time.
I was trying to keep as much of the original submitters text as possible (because I know what it’s like to have your words chopped about) but, in the end, gave myself a headache trying to make it make sense and went a bit OTT. Honestly, I rewrote that last part about 15 times and, clearly, lost my way. Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 09:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories: