Misplaced Pages

Talk:Gunde Jhallumandi: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:44, 15 October 2016 editChampion (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,547 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:08, 14 November 2024 edit undoRfl0216 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users179,129 editsNo edit summary 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Film |Indian=y}}
}}

==untitled==
], you have added the tag to this film that it is a fans point of view and not a neutral point of view, can you let me know which part of the article looks like that?--] (]) 02:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC) ], you have added the tag to this film that it is a fans point of view and not a neutral point of view, can you let me know which part of the article looks like that?--] (]) 02:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
:I believe that the plot section is difficult to comprehend. - ] ('']'') ('']'') <small>(Formerly '''TheChampionMan1234''')</small> 02:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC) :I believe that the plot section is difficult to comprehend. - ] ('']'') ('']'') <small>(Formerly '''TheChampionMan1234''')</small> 02:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
::], If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--] (]) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC) ::], If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--] (]) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
:::I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - ] ('']'') ('']'') <small>(Formerly '''TheChampionMan1234''')</small> 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC) :::I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - ] ('']'') ('']'') <small>(Formerly '''TheChampionMan1234''')</small> 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
::::I can't understand why this simple story is difficult to understand. Sorry but I can't agree with you. --] (]) 03:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:08, 14 November 2024

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFilm: Indian
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

untitled

User:Champion, you have added the tag to this film that it is a fans point of view and not a neutral point of view, can you let me know which part of the article looks like that?--Ravichandra (talk) 02:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

I believe that the plot section is difficult to comprehend. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
User:Champion, If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--Ravichandra (talk) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I can't understand why this simple story is difficult to understand. Sorry but I can't agree with you. --Ravichandra (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Categories: