| Revision as of 12:00, 25 April 2007 editMatt57 (talk | contribs)8,665 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:01, 25 April 2007 edit undoKirbytime (talk | contribs)2,961 edits stop edit warring on my talk pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at ], at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Misplaced Pages, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at ], in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at ] - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! ]...''<small><font color="#008822">]</font></small>'' 10:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at ], at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Misplaced Pages, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at ], in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at ] - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! ]...''<small><font color="#008822">]</font></small>'' 10:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Deletion of links from 72 virgins == | |||
| Please explain why you these two links: | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| --] <sup>(]•])</sup> 03:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Non-scholarly secondary sources.--]♥] 05:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Please sign what you've written about consensus building.--<font face="monospace">](]-])</font> 09:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :kirby, "scholarly" is not a requirement for external links. All that matters is the relevance. Read ].--] <sup>(]•])</sup> 11:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I was referring to the use of those sites as sources. ]--]♥] 01:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :What is the exact policy from that page that disqualifies those sites as sources? --] <sup>(]•])</sup> 04:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::]--]♥] 06:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Whats REGFLAG'ish about the links you took down? --] <sup>(]•])</sup> 07:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Stop trolling, you know perfectly well.--]♥] 09:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Huh? Why dont you have any explanation for what you did? I will restore the links. I'll see what to do if you delete them again. --] <sup>(]•])</sup> 11:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I understand you have great regard for your religion, but can you explain why you're deleting the sourced quote from ]? If you delete text again from this article without discussing it on the Talk page, I will take this to the authorities e.g. an RfC or something. --] <sup>(]•])</sup> 11:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:01, 25 April 2007
I always respond to messages here.
|
|---|
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
|
| munafiqun |
{{Afghanistan-newspaper-stub}}
Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at Misplaced Pages:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Misplaced Pages, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 10:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)