Misplaced Pages

Talk:Adam Kokesh: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:57, 18 May 2013 editDA1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,789 edits →Excessive Detail and Narrative Style← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:05, 18 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,808,168 editsm +{{WP Politics |libertarianism=yes |libertarianism-importance=mid}}; cleanupTag: AWB 
(74 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Biography {{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=C|listas=Kokesh, Adam|1=
{{WikiProject Biography |military-work-group=yes |military-priority=Low}}
|living=yes
{{WikiProject Military history |class=C |B1 <!-- Referencing and citations -->=n |B2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy -->=y |B3 <!-- Structure -->=y |B4 <!-- Grammar and style -->=y |B5 <!-- Supporting materials -->=y |Biography=yes |US=yes}}
|class=start
{{WikiProject United States |importance=Low |AZ=yes|AZ-importance=low}}

|listas=Kokesh, Adam
}}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|B1=n|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Biography=yes|US=yes}}
{{WikiProject United States|class=start |importance=low|listas=Kokesh, Adam}}
{{WikiProject Journalism}} {{WikiProject Journalism}}
{{WikiProject Politics}} {{WikiProject Politics |libertarianism=yes |libertarianism-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture}}
| blp=yes
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 1
|algo = old(180d)
|archive = Talk:Adam Kokesh/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
* <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (#USPP SWAT Team) is no longer available because it was ] before. <!-- {"title":"USPP SWAT Team","appear":{"revid":480273059,"parentid":476251443,"timestamp":"2012-03-05T05:30:20Z","replaced_anchors":{"USPP SWAT TEAM":"USPP SWAT Team"},"removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"disappear":{"revid":618860909,"parentid":618394680,"timestamp":"2014-07-28T19:33:18Z","replaced_anchors":{"USPP SWAT Team":"USPP SWAT team","Rank Structure":"Rank structure","The Air Florida Flight 90 Incident":"The Air Florida Flight 90 incident"},"removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"very_different":false,"rename_to":"USPP SWAT team"} -->
}} }}


== This page is acting as a promotional website for this man ==


This really needs to be cleaned up. The man pulled out a shotgun in the centre of DC in 2016 and served jail time and most of the 2016 section is about his book. It's preposterous. The page should be deleted if no established editors are looking after it. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
{{archives}}<br/><br/><br/>
: ] and make edits you feel would improve the article. --] (]) 20:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

:There's also no mention of his ties to the far-right conspiracy program Info Wars.--] (]) 06:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
==Copyright problem removed==
: {{u|Craigboy}} The issue originally addressed by the editors above seems to have already been addressed in the article. What changes are you proposing regarding ]? Just add them to the article as the other editor suggested. ] (]) 15:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

:What "ties"? Sounds like a weasel word. I Googled Info Wars and Adam Kokesh, but found articles about him there. The website has articles about a whole bunch of public figures, not just Kokesh. Right-wing or not, it is a news website, and being written about or interviewed by them doesn't mean he has "ties" to it. I found an interview with him so if it's necessary to mention that he has been a guest, I can do that, but it sounds like trivia.--] (]) 16:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). {{#if:http://www.kokeshforcongress.com/|The material was copied from: http://www.kokeshforcongress.com/.|}}
:I mentioned it, but another editor removed it. So I'm leaving this alone now.--] (]) 17:38, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
{{#if:|The material was copied from: {{{url}}}.|}}
:I've added a "controversies" section. Feel free to contribute to it! ] (]) 04:06, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, ''unless'' it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ] if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ] if you are.) For ], we cannot accept ] text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences'' or ''phrases''. Accordingly, the material ''may'' be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original ''or'' ] from that source. Please see our ] for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators '''will''' be ] from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. <!-- Template:Cclean --> <!--Signature-->] (]) 01:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
==possible sources==


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
*"Marine Vet Faces Hearing Over Protest," By Heather Hollingsworth. ] Thursday, May 31, 2007. -] (]) 21:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


I have just modified 3 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
=="Adam vs The Man" section==
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080610085312/http://www.radaronline.com/features/2007/06/adam_kokesh_iraq_veterans_against_the_war_cindy_sheehan_1.php to http://radaronline.com/features/2007/06/adam_kokesh_iraq_veterans_against_the_war_cindy_sheehan_1.php
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/17990389/dancing-again-at-jefferson-memorial-no-arrests
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/22879607/activist-kokesh-will-run-for-president-to-abolish-us-government


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
That whole section is incredibly biased, and barely states what the show is about. All it seems to do is highlight how RT is controversial. ] (]) 06:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
:I agree it was a biased presentation and have made more NPOV. People can follow links for the praise and/or "dirt" on both Russia Today and Accuracy in Media. This article doesn't have to do it for POV purposes. ] (]) 04:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
==TJ dance party==


Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 02:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
There are two entries for this. One in the protest section, and one in adam vs the man. The first entry was in the protest section, which one should this one be in?--] (]) 04:30, 29 May 2011 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
:Both have been removed but I added it back in the protest section. There is no reason to remove this from the article like it previously was. The new source is from Fox News in D.C.--] (]) 01:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
==TJ dance party==


I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
I was at the TJ Dance Party. There were over a thousand demonstrators, easy, and there is a TON of video proof out there on the internet; Just go looking. Also, Over a hundred of us danced *inside* the rotunda uninterrupted and without harassment from the US Parks Police, who actually went out of their way to NOT interact with the dancers. Even in the Washington Post video article, you can plainly see they are inside the monument. Your wiki on this event is wholly misrepresented. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161127215002/https://acronymjournal.com/2014/07/03/adam-kokeshs-independence-day-call-to-arms-revisited/ to https://acronymjournal.com/2014/07/03/adam-kokeshs-independence-day-call-to-arms-revisited/
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to https://www.kokesh.org/


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/local/dancing-protesters-return-to-jefferson-memorial-060411 @ 1:40 "More than 40 minutes after the dancing started, the last three protesters left their own". Please properly represent this event. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
==Report on RT cancellation==
has a report. I don't know how WP:RS it is, though searching the general URL find quote a few articles, including BLP, do use it. I'm not too driven to put it in but FYI. ] (]) 15:00, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 00:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
:I wouldn't say that site is RS but it has plenty of good links, including that reports on the cancellation of the "show".
:-- ] (]) 15:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
::Read the whole article and find the links? I don't need to read no stinking... har har. Thanks. ] (]) 17:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


==Massive changes==
==Explain Advert and Unreliable Source tags==
User:Plot Spoiler put them on the other day but I don't see those problems and unless he explains specifically what needs to be fixed, the tags will be removed soon. Thanks. '']'' 03:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
:Was just checking this. I don't see the reason either. Removed tags now. For anyone wish to add them then explain on the talk page. Regards, ] <sup>(])</sup> 14:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)


Hello,
==Revamp==
This is response to the unwarranted "revert" attempt by a certain user. I have edited the article in purely productive manner. I have replaced several dead links with alternative and archived links (this required a lot of time/effort on my part). I have cleaned up certain areas and added newer citations to them. I have also added a "Personal background" section, where I have moved the info about his father, and added more info on background and family. I have also decided to break up and divide the "Protest activities" section into smaller sub-sections divided by year. And plan to add a few more protest events to that list/section. DA1 16:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
:Please do not be offended by a revert of your changes. I suggest you make the changes in smaller increments so that other editors can easily see what you've done and how you have rearranged content. IfThe edits can be unclear or time-consuming to decipher when many small changes are done in a single edit and general summary. Also please discuss content and edits and avoid references to other editors. Thank you. ] ] 17:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
::Thanks for the response. I actually tried to include larger swathes per edit, because I've seen in the past how certain users advise to use "show preview" section rather than making individual edits. I will try to be more descriptive in my edit summaries. However, I would like you to preview/analyze my edits and see if i removed anything of importance or not. I can assure you, I only added info, rearranged certain info, and mostly replaced/added links and cite. There were a lot of dead citations, and formatting inconsistencies, I spent last night and this morning fixing that. ] (]) 17:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
:::To be frank, my level of interest in this article is not high enough to warrant the time it would take me to sort through a single compound edit. My quick impression is that some of your edits are constructive and add significant information but that others make the narrative obscure and take a somewhat promotional non-encyclopedic tone and style of language. Anyway, I think many smaller edits would engage more feedback for your work here, and please be mindful not to introduce "peacock" evaluative, or promotional language into the article. ] ] 17:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
::::DA1: Not everyone defines peacock language the same. FYI. ''] - <small>]</small><big>&#x1f5fd;</big> 23:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


I've made some massive changes recently, including:
== Excessive Detail and Narrative Style ==
* Expansion to the introduction, and mentioning he is a ] candidate
* An expansion of background on Kokesh's early life, family, and military service
* Replacing the headings in the "Activism" section to human-readable subjects rather than merely years/chronology
* More background on his high-profile ''Iraq Veterans Against The War'' protests in 2007, including resulting discipline and protests in his support
* Expansion on much of his activism (incl. the protest against the high-profile cursing ban in Middleborough)
* Expansion of positions on government, abortion and foreign policy
* Additional background about ''FREEDOM!'' and the "book bomb" in January
* "Controversies" section, which is currently thin
* Moving his bid for congress out of the "Activism" section


I've added the best ]s I can find. Please let me know if there are any problems. I would appreciate any feedback! ] (]) 01:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
The recent additions, particularly the sections captioned by year, have the tone of a real-time narrative or script rather than an encyclopedic summary of notable events. I think some condensation and removal of inessential detail would help this new content deliver the important facts more clearly. Also, some of the references do not appear to be ] for the content cited to them, e.g. International Business Times "Rally a Success..." ] ] 03:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


== removing bad sources and puffery ==
:While year sections probably are not necessary and poorly sourced information should removed. But ] is a perfectly good source. Any others problematic? The purpose of wikipedia is to share relevant information, including about notable people. I think a proper rendition of the VFW commander comments belongs there, if not necessarily as its own section. Just haven't gotten around to fixing it yet. ''] - <small>]</small><big>&#x1f5fd;</big> 03:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
::Regardless of whether there is some RS journalism published on the IBT website, the cited web page is opinion and promotion and is not RS news reporting: . ] ] 12:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
:::From sounds more like that was a journalistic report, if rather enthusiastic. The next sentence ref is the problematic one. I've encouraged the editor whose been active here to come join the discussion since this except for watching out for actual BLP violations I'm not heavily invested in this article. ''] - <small>]</small><big>&#x1f5fd;</big>
Please elaborate your concern. I may not fully engage in discussion today (if its long), as I'm kind of busy, but I will eventually get around to answering it by tomorrow night for sure. ] (]) 20:10, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
: Okay, I actually read all of your comments. For some reason I only read Moore's comment and missed Specifico's. Yes, i concur with the other user that IBTimes is reliable. Also, i have been doing extensive research and comparison between sources/links before deciding to use one to a given line on the article. And what I've seen, some of the other articles out there are more fluffed up than this one you may have concern over (which i believe is unwarranted as is). I know for a fact that around 500 people attended, 300+ of whom were veterans (this is based on numerous YT statements by Kokesh himself). However, some of the other articles out there (and not many articles out there, the incident was very under-reported) state either NO attendance-figures or that over the thousands. IBTimes, actually mentioned a reliable attendance number without exaggeration or non-specificity. Also, calling something a "success" doesn't make it "opinion and promotion", it may have implied what the organizers for the event considered it to be (a success). ] (]) 20:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
:: I also would like to state, my style may seem un-preferable by some, but I'm willing to modify that as i go along. However, what matters most is the encyclopedic content, and not the narration per se. My whole aim is to clean up the article (which I've done) and continue to include relevant content throughout the years (that have been missed). As for me assigning "years", I did so as part of cleaning up the section. There were already numerous examples/events listed, and I figured it would be best to divide them by year, so as to be easier for readers and newer edits can be made in chronological order (which is seemed to lack in some respects, previously). ] (]) 20:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
{{od}Whether such an event is a success is a matter of opinion, not fact. For whatever reason, the page cited is opinion, praise and promotion. The IBT and this writer may from time to time do journalistic news reporting, but this ain't it. An attendance figure, on the other hand, seems like a fact that could be reported here if well-sourced. 500 people attended the press conference when Anthony Weiner resigned his Congressional seat, but it was not a "success." I am not criticizing your effort to add fact here, however some of it may be challenged when it lacks proper sources and some of it may be copy edited for style or excessive detail. I'm not anticipating spending much of my time here, but those will be the issues that I would expect future editors to work on. ] ] 20:45, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
:: I suggested exactly that, that its a matter of opinion ("success"), and fortunately you will see that matter of POV is not present within my edits to the Wiki article itself. Opinion stayed within the opinion piece, if that is what you consider it. According to '']'', an opinionated source does Not make it unreliable. I have made sure to that, and my edits were completely neutral. And the only thing being put into question here is a "title" of the article and not what's within it, because that seemed rather neutral as well. I only cared for the content source, not the persuasion. Being a niche event, the options are limited and the alternatives are even more "opinionated". Also, IBTimes is a genuine newspaper thats circulated in NY, its not a ]. ] (]) 20:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
:::I've gone ahead and switched the link to an alternative cite. However, i would still reiterate Misplaced Pages does not require sources to be neutral, only its own wiki articles. Though i also dispute that source was somehow opinionated anyways. ] (]) 21:07, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
::::Still promotional not factual. WP requires sources either to be factual, to be cited as the opinion of the author, or to represent broadly held opinion that is documented as such. This one doesn't qualify. ] ] 21:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
I heavily dispute this claim. And am open to a third-party to look into the sources, and arbitrate whether it is factual or not. I also dispute the assertion that somehow the source author is just making stuff up, just because you think its "promotional". The assertion is ridiculous, and ] has nothing to gain nor any affiliation from such a venture. ] (]) 21:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
:1.The assertion that "successful" is opinion and evaluation is true on its face. "Successful" is not an objective factual report. It is not that the reporter "made stuff up" as in misstating fact, it's that he stated his evaluation or opinion in a linguistic and reportorial format as if it were fact. 2. Good idea to get more editors looking at this, maybe post on RS board asking for comment. Also maybe post on various projects relating to journalism. 3. Tabloids most certainly do have something to gain by enthusiastically inflating the significance of the events about which they write. Think about it. I don't think you really believe the supermarket tabloids have nothing to gain by running stories claiming some movie star was impregnated by a runaway elephant or some politician was abducted by the little people from Pluto. Of course they have something to gain, otherwise we would not have lousy journalism all around us. If nothing else they save on the staff time, expense, and payroll of enforcing legitimate journalistic standards and practices. ] ] 22:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


This isn't a ], so I removed the excessive quotes and a lot of questionable non-RSes and self-sourcing - ] (]) 07:08, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
:: This back and forth between us is redundant and i was hoping for a ''third-party'' to give their take. And the purported "subjective" nature of the source material is irrelevant as per '']'', only the wiki article is required to be neutral and not the source material (although i still insist the material ''is'' infact neutral). Furthermore, i have already received recommendation from a Misplaced Pages moderator to use the article that you are attempting to shoot down: ''http://en.wikipedia.org/MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist#examiner.com_article_on_Ron_Paul_march'' — ] (]) 22:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
:::This is not a battle. Nobody is shooting here. I urge you to read your link RE:RS biased sources. It's not about stating opinion as if it were fact. What does it mean to say that something is "successful" without specifying successful at what or in accomplishing what end? BTW, it would be more productive, to say the least, if you announce here that you are seeking a third opinion. Others will help you to find the proper venue and to provide as much background information as possible on all sides. ] ] 22:51, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
:::I just took a look at the link you cited on the spam noticeboard. That's hardly an opinion on the issues under discussion here. Please be careful to state such matters clearly and accurately. ] ] 22:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
::::Just because the reporter calls it successful in his opinion, doesn't mean you can't state facts. It's not like "success" is such an extra-ordinarly high bar anyway; in protest terms it merely means enough people showed up to make the point organizers wanted to make (and get covered at least by IBT times). It does not mean that the protest made some big change in policy or headlines all over the country. Few protests are that successful! I think the larger community would agree that a not terribly controversial opinion ("success in protesting") does not obviate the facts presented by an award winning professional journalist. ''] - <small>]</small><big>&#x1f5fd;</big> 02:27, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
:::::Speaking of headlines all over the country, just searched his name in news.google and, not unexpectedly, quite a bit of commentary on his gun march - and 4000+ people signing up. (WP:COI??? I talked to him just once in 2007 at/after a demo - thus the photo I added to page a while back. Otherwise, just watching the passing parade.) Don't quite have energy to read and add anything from the various articles at this point. ''] - <small>]</small><big>&#x1f5fd;</big> 02:52, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
{{od}}The reporter did not "call it successful in his opinion." He stated it was successful as if that were fact, but without defining what was meant by that term, which is an evaluation not a description. Please check the definition of obviate -- your meaning is not clear. The fact that the journalist won an award for other unrelated work is irrelevant. If you have a better source for description or properly attributed reaction to this event, that would resolve the problem. ] ] 02:55, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
:I cut down the unnecessary detail. And added a better ref here. Easier to search than discuss most of the time anyway :-) ''] - <small>]</small><big>&#x1f5fd;</big> 04:16, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
:: I know its not a "battle",but that's exactly what it seemed here, when you argue back/forth because of a single source which was not even cited for its opinion but its recording of events. I second Carolmoordc's opinions. I also have observed most of the newer edits to the article, and say that I am perfectly comfortable with them. Some of them, i would have eventually made myself. I will, however, make some minor edits.] (]) 13:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:05, 18 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adam Kokesh article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Military
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Biography / North America / United States
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Military biography task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
WikiProject iconUnited States: Arizona Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconJournalism
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics: Libertarianism
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconInternet culture
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

  • ] The anchor (#USPP SWAT Team) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This page is acting as a promotional website for this man

This really needs to be cleaned up. The man pulled out a shotgun in the centre of DC in 2016 and served jail time and most of the 2016 section is about his book. It's preposterous. The page should be deleted if no established editors are looking after it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.24.235.14 (talk) 19:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

WP:BEBOLD and make edits you feel would improve the article. --Weazie (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
There's also no mention of his ties to the far-right conspiracy program Info Wars.--Craigboy (talk) 06:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Craigboy The issue originally addressed by the editors above seems to have already been addressed in the article. What changes are you proposing regarding Info Wars? Just add them to the article as the other editor suggested. Saturnalia0 (talk) 15:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
What "ties"? Sounds like a weasel word. I Googled Info Wars and Adam Kokesh, but found articles about him there. The website has articles about a whole bunch of public figures, not just Kokesh. Right-wing or not, it is a news website, and being written about or interviewed by them doesn't mean he has "ties" to it. I found an interview with him so if it's necessary to mention that he has been a guest, I can do that, but it sounds like trivia.--23mason (talk) 16:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
I mentioned it, but another editor removed it. So I'm leaving this alone now.--23mason (talk) 17:38, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
I've added a "controversies" section. Feel free to contribute to it! 84percent (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Adam Kokesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Kokesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Massive changes

Hello,

I've made some massive changes recently, including:

  • Expansion to the introduction, and mentioning he is a single-issue candidate
  • An expansion of background on Kokesh's early life, family, and military service
  • Replacing the headings in the "Activism" section to human-readable subjects rather than merely years/chronology
  • More background on his high-profile Iraq Veterans Against The War protests in 2007, including resulting discipline and protests in his support
  • Expansion on much of his activism (incl. the protest against the high-profile cursing ban in Middleborough)
  • Expansion of positions on government, abortion and foreign policy
  • Additional background about FREEDOM! and the "book bomb" in January
  • "Controversies" section, which is currently thin
  • Moving his bid for congress out of the "Activism" section

I've added the best WP:RSs I can find. Please let me know if there are any problems. I would appreciate any feedback! 84percent (talk) 01:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

removing bad sources and puffery

This isn't a WP:BROCHURE, so I removed the excessive quotes and a lot of questionable non-RSes and self-sourcing - David Gerard (talk) 07:08, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Categories: