User talk:Michael C Price: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:35, 28 April 2014 editGamebm (talk \| contribs)298 edits →FA review?← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk \| contribs)Bots3,133,055 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery
(32 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{semi-retired\|date=March 2012}}
	{{Archive box\|auto=long}}		{{Archive box\|auto=long\|age=100\|bot=MiszaBot I}}
	{{User:MiszaBot/config		{{User:MiszaBot/config
	\|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav\|noredlinks=y}}		\|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav\|noredlinks=y}}
	\|maxarchivesize = 100K		\|maxarchivesize = 100K
	\|counter = 7		\|counter = 8
	\|minthreadsleft = 5		\|minthreadsleft = 5
	\|algo = old(100d)		\|algo = old(100d)
	\|archive = User talk:Michael C Price/Archive %(counter)d		\|archive = User talk:Michael C Price/Archive %(counter)d
	}}		}}
	{{Auto archiving notice \|bot=MiszaBot I \|age=100 \|small=yes}}
	'''Welcome!'''		'''Welcome!'''

Line 34:		Line 34:


			== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
	== Question ==

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	Out of curiosity, has John Carter also been harassing you? If so, that makes four the number of editors John has been harassing. ] ] 11:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2022\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	:Not recently, since I've been semi-retired! IMO JC is a mostly civil POV pusher, which is the most insidous sort, of course, since it damages article quality in ways hard to repair. He did try to form a tag team, once, to get me permabanned, but it failed when the covert nature of it was blown. -- cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 12:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
	:: What type of POV does JC have? ] ] 13:27, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

			</div>
⚫	:~~::Roman~~ ~~Catholic.~~ -- cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 13:29, 3 ~~December~~ ~~2012~~ (UTC)
			</div>
	:::: Thanks for the information. ] ] 21:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 -->

			== Stop reverting my referenced edits. ==
	:::Pass a Method was blocked (for the 3rd time) for edit warring recently by another Admin (John Carter wasn't involved in the article). And isn't just John Carter who has disagreed with him recently. Several editors have reverted him at various articles and I warned him for a misleading edit summary and reverted some of his edits related to Raelianism. is relevant also. Don't get me wrong, John's not perfect, but as almost always, context is key. ] (]) 13:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
	::::Michael, you failed to mention in your groosly inaccurate, and frankly grossly dishonest, statements above your own history of outright POV pushing regarding your beloved Robert Eisenmanand his widely rejected opinions regarding the Ebionites. That is, basically, the only subject regarding which I have had previous dealing with you, and, frankly, as can be seen from the Arbitration records, the only person who has been sanctioned regarding that matter to date is you yourself.
	::::The best person to contact regarding this matter is actually neither Ignocrates/Ovadyah, but ]. He tried to mediate the discussion involving both of those editors, which proved impossible given the POV pushing of both of them. He is also something that I believe neither of those two parties is, which is someone who has the trust and respect of the wikipedia community regarding matters of policy and guidelines. He is also familiar with the conduct of both of those editors and myself regarding this subject. And, as Pass a Method knows, I think most people would agree, in general, my POV is toward that of the best independent reliable sources. Sadly, neither Michael not Ignocrates can really say the same thing. ] (]) 15:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
	:::::Inaccurate, as ever; same old John, eh? Yawn. -- cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 23:13, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
	:::::Speaking of frankly grossly dishonest, two attempts were made at mediation with Jayjg serving as the mediator. Both attempts ended, unsuccessfully, when John Carter unilaterally withdrew from the mediation process. ] (]) 00:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
	::::::I suspect this may be yet another attempt by John Carter to revive a dead dispute. Let's put an end to this nonsense and move on. ] (]) 00:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
	:::::::Michael, a review of your talk page will clearly show that you were subject to sanctions. And I find it laughable that Ignocrates, who so far as I can tell has done little if anything other than try to start and continue disputes, tries to criticize someone else for doing what seems to currently be his sole purpose. Pass a Method can certainly check the ArbCom records for the Ebionites case, and as I said before I think Jayjg has much reasonable comments than either of the above. And the attempts at mediation failed, honestly, because of the tag-teaming and I thought, and still think, pathological devotion to fringe theories of 2 of the 3 parties involved constituted stonewalling. I have never changed my opinion regarding that, and I think Jayjg might even agree.
	::::::In any event, to Pass a Method, I think thae Jayjg will also be able to indicate that I had serious questions regarding Ignocrates's objectivity, but even after what I thought and still think was willful harassment on his part, chose not to pursue them on the noticeboards because of his, to my eyes, impaired judgment. I say this as an indicator that neither I, nor anyone else, will actively seek action against someone provided their problems do not become too problematic to others. I once again suggest that you seek assistance with your own problems. I think Adjwilley might well be the best person for this task, given that your relationship with him is probably your closest, and least problematic on, here. ] (]) 02:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
	::::::: John, you need to seek asisstence with your patronizing tone. ] ] 10:11, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

			I put my content back and added another source. ] (]) 20:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
	== Wikilinking ==

		⚫	:You are degrading the article with changes no one else agrees with - and which are often false. wholey or partially cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 21:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
	Hello Michael,

			== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
	Regarding your revert of me "underlinking" ]. I was trying to make the article reflect this MoS guideline: ]. Is that particular guideline point not valid anymore or can we just pay no attention to it? --] (]) 15:25, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	: Hi Michael. Since you are remaining silent, I'm beginning to think that ] guideline is not an optional one. My conclusion is that you are either not aware of that guideline or that you are ignoring it just because you disagree with it. In either case - unless you give a good reason why not to do it - I'm going to revert your edit and continue to remove overlinking (as it is defined in MoS) when I encounter it. --] (]) 09:28, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2023\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	::Let me ask you a question. Do you think removing the links makes Misplaced Pages better or worse? -- cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 11:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
	:::To WANAX: Obviously we should follow MOS, but there are also pointless and tiresome conventions concerning formatting. "Over-wiki-linking" is one of them (others include bold/italic text, using the exact spacing and dashes; all letter for letter, word for word, line by line...). Over-linking it doesn't harm the article at all, it just makes it easier for the reader to click to an article. I do it sometimes. Ever seen ]? ] (]) 12:42, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

			</div>
	::::My opinion is that too many links are distracting and make the article harder to read. So yes, removing excessive linkage makes Misplaced Pages better. See ] as an example. Isn't linking Hor-Aha each and every time it occurs excessive in your opinion? Maschen: I don't agree at all that those conventions are pointless. :) I think consistency is very important and personal preference is not good enough reason to ignore MoS. However I don't think it's worth the effort to argue about this issue so I'm going to refrain from removing the links (for now).--] (]) 13:26, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 -->
			== "]" listed at ] ==
			]
			The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink\|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 11#Hyperstars}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ]]] 15:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

			== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
	== ] move request ==

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	Hello, I would like to notify of the discussion at ], in which I object to a comment you once made on the Hoyle's fallacy talk page. Thank you. --] (]) 19:59, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2024\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	== FA review? ==

			If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
	Hello,

			</div>
	I noticed that you are involved with the physics articles on Misplaced Pages, and I was wondering if you could help me out. Right now, I'm working to bring the article ] to FA status. So far, people have had many good suggestions and many positive things to say about the article, but I'm having trouble getting people to support or oppose the nomination.
			</div>

			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->
	I was wondering if you'd be willing to take a look at it and tell us your thoughts at ]. Please note that you do not have to be an expert on the subject. The article has already been checked quite carefully by other reviewers, and at this point, I'm just looking for people who can check that it meets the ].

	Please let me know if you're interested. Thanks. ] (]) 15:54, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

	==Question about energy momentum tensor==

	I have a concerning the conservation law of energy-momentum tensor. If possible, please take a look, really appreciated! ] (]) 19:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024

SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages as of March 2012.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Welcome!

Hello, Michael C Price, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

You did very nice edits on Many-worlds interpretation! Welcome to wikipedia! --DenisDiderot 10:44, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks DD -- glad you liked it. Thanks for the links. I'll probably confine myself straightforward textural edits for the near future whilst I get the hang of the metatools.--Michael C Price 12:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Bohm interpretation, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Misplaced Pages's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Stop reverting my referenced edits.

I put my content back and added another source. Johnjbarton (talk) 20:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

You are degrading the article with changes no one else agrees with - and which are often false. wholey or partially cheers, Michael C. Price 21:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Hyperstars" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hyperstars has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 11 § Hyperstars until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 15:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)