Revision as of 19:24, 13 February 2020 editDannyS712 bot (talk | contribs)Bots129,254 editsm →New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020: Task 8: Fix a mass message - typo in headingTag: AWB← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:20, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,069 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
(16 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Injector page edit 2 == | |||
== Re: "level-headed and balanced assessment of the situation" == | |||
No problem. This is a very delicate situation where groups have dug in trenches long before this specific issue came up. Emotions can run high, and with all the mounting ridiculousness on Twitter and FB, it's a relief to check the Talk page and find someone like you there. Please, keep it up. ] 19:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Some time ago now, you wrote: | |||
=== The above === | |||
I have left the above on my talk page not as indicative of my level-headedness, of which I possess almost none, but because in the over five years I have been editing, no-one has ever suggested before that I might be the calm voice of reason. I look forward to it happening again in 2020 or so. | |||
< If I get the time I'll chase up my copy of OUP "How steam locomotives really work" and rewrite the unsplit page. > | |||
A cynic would observe that, on this occasion, some of the other editors involved may have been associated with the "ethics in internet misogyny" crowd, and that even I look good next to them. Particularly if that cynic was me getting back to my usual unreasonable self. :-) ] (]) 16:53, 29 September 2015 | |||
Are you in a position to summarise here what the book has to say about how injectors work? Does it have the ring of truth? | |||
== ] Page Edit == | |||
(I'd like to know whether the book is worth buying for how it treats this topic). | |||
Hi, I'm the person who made the change to the https://en.wikipedia.org/Injector page that you recently undid. Can you tell me what your issue is with my edit? Also, I have no idea how to communicate on wikipedia here so please feel free to tell me I'm doing something wrong - literally just made an account to respond to your undo. Honestly, there are a lot of problems with the Venturi/Bernoulli pages as well as the related pages that I'd like to help fix ] (]) 13:22, 2 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
:It's uncited, and there are cites to say it works as the page currently describes it. ] (]) 20:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
::Uncited? It was a quote from an existing citation (#10), and I clearly cited the quote. So...how is that uncited? | |||
::The citations that, as you put it, "say it works as the page currently describes" don't actually do that. If you read citation #3, which I have, it matches my edit and not the existing text. | |||
::I can't say how accurate it aligns with #4 since that's not accessible online, but my guess is not very well since the existing explanation is factually incorrect. Nevertheless, using the existing citations on the page, I have 2 of them that agree with my change, zero that agree with the existing text, and 1 that we can't evaluate because it is inaccessible. | |||
::So...do you still believe the revert is an improvement? If it makes you happier I can replace the Operation section with an exact copy/paste from existing citation #3 (instead of the copy paste from citation #10 with you rejected). Does that work?] (]) 22:09, 2 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
:::I added cite #4, which does mention the Venturi effect, which is important; if the input steam remained above atmospheric pressure the water would never get into the combining cone at all. Much of the page is confused because it can't quite decide if it's about boiler injectors or other devices. ] (]) 22:30, 2 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
::::Can you directly quote cite #4 to me then? | |||
::::The article says "reducing its pressure to below atmospheric which enables it to entrain a fluid" implying (perhaps unintentionally?) that low-pressure is necessary to entrain the fluid. Low pressure might be required to get the fluid up into the combining cone, but per cite 3 and cite 10 it has nothing to do with the entrainment - they clearly state that's momentum exchange via friction/viscosity. | |||
::::Also, in your statement, "which does mention the Venturi effect, which is important; if the input steam remained above atmospheric pressure" - low pressure is only required in a lifting injector. It's not required in a non-lifting injector. Furthermore, what support do you have for your assertion that the low-pressure (in lifting injects) is a result of the Venturi effect rather than simple viscosity?] (]) 00:01, 3 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
TIA | |||
== Romanbow135 == | |||
] (]) 12:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
Hello. I noticed you undoing an edit by this sockpuppet user at ]. Any chance you could take a look at ] and offer some advice on how to handle cleaning up this individual's edits more generally? We're at the sad point where we may be losing long-standing London content because this user moved it to a new article without edit summary or credit, where it might get deleted at face value for being apparently "created by banned user", and I'm not sure how to handle it. (The sockpuppeteer is still blithely active, currently as ].) --] (]) 17:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
:I'm sorry, but that whole thing was a bit of a mystery to me. I'm hoping editors more familiar with the area can sort it out. Sorry. ] (]) 01:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
::General advice on how to deal with this kind of sockpuppet would also be welcome. ] was blocked a month ago and has carried on making exactly the same edits as an IP instead. I get the impression from ] that IP sockpuppets like this (flagged for weeks now) aren't a big priority? --] (]) 08:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
:I am pretty-well starting afresh, but if you ever see this, I certainly would recommend the book on this subject, yes. ] (]) 13:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
== New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019 == | |||
== i want you to create my wiki pge == | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
can you create my wiki oage? ] (]) 23:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
;Backlog | |||
Instead of reaching a magic '''300''' as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google. | |||
== New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022 == | |||
;Coordinator | |||
A proposal is taking place ] to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR. | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
;This month's refresher course | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
'']'', a 2008 essay by long since retired {{U|Ballonman}}, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading. | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
]] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue. | |||
;Deletion tags | |||
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification. | |||
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the ], but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant. | |||
;Paid editing | |||
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator <u>if appropriate</u>, and submit the issue to ] if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts. | |||
In the last 30 days, only ] have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently ] New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All {{NUMBEROFADMINS:R}} administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP. | |||
;Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion | |||
*Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for ]. | |||
*''Blank-and-Redirect'' is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed. | |||
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear. | |||
;Not English | |||
*A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with ]. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it. | |||
;Tools | |||
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs. | |||
If you have noticed a user with a ''good'' understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{tq|<nowiki>{{subst:NPR invite}}</nowiki>}} on their talk page. | |||
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See ], It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools. | |||
If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software. | |||
Assessment: The script at ] makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done. | |||
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]<br>Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
{{noping|DannyS712 bot III}} is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its . | |||
<!-- Drafted by User:MB. Copyedited by User:Kudpung. Proofread by user: DanCherek--> | |||
<small>Go ] to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.</small> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1089313003 --> | |||
] (]) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=914408718 --> | |||
== New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022 == | |||
== Merging phone surveillance articles == | |||
Hello, considering topic overlap I wanted to discuss potentially merging several pages regarding phone surveillance. I see you've recently done some edits on one of these pages, so wanted to bring it to your attention. ] would love to hear your thoughts. ] (]) 14:18, 24 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
== New Page Review newsletter November 2019 == | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | <div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | ||
Line 78: | Line 51: | ||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |- style="font-size: 86%;" | ||
|} | |} | ||
] | ]] | ||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | ||
;Backlog status | |||
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon. | |||
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new ] on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000{{efn|not including another ~6,000 redirects}} at the end of May. | |||
;Getting the queue to 0 | |||
There are now {{NUMBERINGROUP:patroller}} holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.<br> | |||
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If ''each'' reviewer soon does '''only 2 reviews a day''' over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by ''every'' reviewer doing '''only 1 review every 2 days''' - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.<br> | |||
Want to join? Consider adding the ].<br> | |||
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some ]. | |||
; Coordinator | |||
Admin {{U|Barkeep49}} has been officially invested as ] by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers. | |||
;This month's refresher course | |||
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: ] will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Misplaced Pages or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See ] to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources. | |||
;Tools | |||
*It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list. | |||
*It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar. | |||
;Reviewer Feedback | |||
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. ] will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional ] for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch ''November 13''. | |||
;Second set of eyes | |||
*Not only are ''New Page Reviewers'' the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the ] section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing ''good'' work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR. | |||
*Do be sure to have ] on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers. | |||
;Arbitration Committee | |||
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights. | |||
;Community Wish list | |||
There is to be no ] for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion. | |||
<hr> | |||
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself ] | |||
</small> | |||
</div>] (]) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=924341675 --> | |||
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.{{efn|The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.}} | |||
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message == | |||
In the last 30 days, ] have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month). | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month). | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
;Backlog drive | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by ] and ], will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up ]. ] Barnstars will be awarded. | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=926750357 --> | |||
;TIP – New school articles | |||
== New Page Review newsletter December 2019 == | |||
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Misplaced Pages's projects and policy pages. ] has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable. | |||
;Misc | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
There is a new template available, {{txl|NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder: | |||
] | |||
:{{NPP backlog}} | |||
<!-- ] --> | |||
;Reviewer of the Year | |||
] | |||
This year's Reviewer of the Year is {{noping|Rosguill}}. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult. | |||
There has been significant discussion at ] recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues. | |||
Special commendation again goes to {{noping|Onel5969}} who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to {{noping| Boleyn}} and {{noping|JTtheOG}} who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well. | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with ] and ] (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year. | |||
;Reminders | |||
*Consider staying informed on project issues by putting ] on your watchlist. | |||
*If you have noticed a user with a ''good'' understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{tq|<nowiki>{{subst:NPR invite}}</nowiki>}} on their talk page. | |||
*If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software. | |||
*To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
;Notes | |||
{{notelist}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
<!-- Drafted by User:MB. Copyedited by User:Kudpung. Proofread by user: DanCherek--> </div> | |||
] (]) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Nnadigoodluck@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1094756077 --> | |||
== NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on! == | |||
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year. | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">July 2022 Backlog Drive</span> | |||
|+Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days | |||
|rowspan=3|] | |||
!Rank | |||
!Username | |||
!Num reviews | |||
!Log | |||
|- | |- | ||
| |
| | ||
* On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. | |||
|] (]) | |||
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. | |||
| data-sort-value="Onel5969" |47,395 | |||
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
*Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. | |||
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
|2 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="Rosguill" |41,883 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|3 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="JTtheOG" |11,493 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|4 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="Arthistorian1977" |5,562 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|5 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="Boleyn" |4,866 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|6 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="DannyS712" |3,995 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|7 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="Cwmhiraeth" |3,812 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|8 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="Ymblanter" |3,655 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|9 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="CAPTAIN" |3,553 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|10 | |||
|] (]) | |||
|3,522 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|} | |} | ||
(] · ]) ''']''' 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
(''The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found ''']''''') | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Buidhe@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1096016086 --> | |||
== New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022 == | |||
;Redirect autopatrol | |||
A recent ] on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was ]. New Page Reviewers are now able to ] who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a ] whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by {{noping|DannyS712 bot III}}. | |||
;Source Guide Discussion | |||
Set to launch early in the new year is our first ] discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a ] prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the ] for more information. | |||
;This month's refresher course | |||
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on ]. Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag. | |||
</div>Delivered by ] (]) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=931696676 --> | |||
== New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020 == | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | <div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | ||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | {| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | ||
|} | |||
{| style="float: right; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |- style="font-size: 86%;" | ||
|} | |} | ||
] | |||
] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | ||
;Backlog status | |||
;Source Guide Discussion | |||
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators {{u|Buidhe}} and {{u|Zippybonzo}}, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to {{u|Dr vulpes}} who led with 880 points. See ] for further details. | |||
The first ] discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success. | |||
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the '''other 600 reviewers''' to do more! Please try to do at least '''one a day'''. | |||
;Redirects | |||
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the ]. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at ]. | |||
;Coordination: {{u|MB}} and {{u|Novem Linguae}} have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. {{u|MPGuy2824}} will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years. | |||
;Discussions and Resources | |||
*There is an ] around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles. | |||
*A recent discussion of whether ] restraunts are notable was ]. | |||
*A ] with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month. | |||
*A ] to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn. | |||
;Open letter to the WMF: The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at ]). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it ]. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive. | |||
;Refresher | |||
] generally do not need ] type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of ] for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline. | |||
;TIP - Reviewing by subject: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated ]. | |||
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095 | |||
] | |||
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
;New reviewers: The ] is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read ] exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page ]. | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
</small> | |||
;Reminders | |||
</div>16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
*Consider staying informed on project issues by putting ] on your watchlist. | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=940512118 --> | |||
*If you have noticed a user with a ''good'' understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{tq|<nowiki>{{subst:NPR invite}}</nowiki>}} on their talk page. | |||
*If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software. | |||
*To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
{{refend}} | |||
<!-- Drafted by User:MB and User:Kudpung. Proofread by User:DanCherek --> </div> | |||
Delivered by: ] (]) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1102314130 --> | |||
== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1124425182 --> | |||
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1187132125 --> | |||
== Mamie Van Doren == | |||
I made a new Stark Naked 6 film. There is no known filmer, and Mamie has said on X (https://twitter.com/Mamievandoren/status/1632611277825781761), that she intends these films to be used freely. ] (]) 23:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
:No, there she is saying there is no paywall. That is absolutely not the same as giving permission for them to be uploaded on Commons. ] (]) 23:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 --> |
Latest revision as of 00:20, 19 November 2024
Injector page edit 2
Some time ago now, you wrote:
< If I get the time I'll chase up my copy of OUP "How steam locomotives really work" and rewrite the unsplit page. >
Are you in a position to summarise here what the book has to say about how injectors work? Does it have the ring of truth?
(I'd like to know whether the book is worth buying for how it treats this topic).
TIA
81.135.234.168 (talk) 12:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- I am pretty-well starting afresh, but if you ever see this, I certainly would recommend the book on this subject, yes. Pinkbeast (talk) 13:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
i want you to create my wiki pge
can you create my wiki oage? 49.36.213.97 (talk) 23:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022
Hello Pinkbeast,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 812 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 848 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022
Hello Pinkbeast,
- Backlog status
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.
In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
- Backlog drive
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.
- TIP – New school articles
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Misplaced Pages's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
- Misc
There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}
, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 15587 articles, as of 22:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot
There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
- Reminders
- Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
- If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing
{{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page. - If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
- To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
- Notes
- not including another ~6,000 redirects
- The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!
New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022
Hello Pinkbeast,
- Backlog status
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
- Coordination
- MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
- Open letter to the WMF
- The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
- TIP - Reviewing by subject
- Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
- New reviewers
- The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
- Reminders
- Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
- If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing
{{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page. - If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
- To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Mamie Van Doren
I made a new Stark Naked 6 film. There is no known filmer, and Mamie has said on X (https://twitter.com/Mamievandoren/status/1632611277825781761), that she intends these films to be used freely. GreyChen (talk) 23:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- No, there she is saying there is no paywall. That is absolutely not the same as giving permission for them to be uploaded on Commons. Pinkbeast (talk) 23:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)