Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rama: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:40, 30 August 2023 editRama (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users44,661 edits Demerliac request 25 August 2023← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:45, 19 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,219 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Rama/Archive 16) (bot 
(18 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
---- ----


== Museum photography, metadata, and French exhibits ==
== ''Volcan'' and ''Conception'' ==


Hello,
Hi Rama, {{u|Acad Ronin}}, I got ] a while ago and seperately a cropped detail of it. The institution got horribly mixed up on the title, they differ for both images. I believe this is ''The Pinco ''Conception'' in Battle with Xebec Le ''Volcan'', 1804''. The Volcan is flying a British flag, RN? Its not inconceivable that the names are mixed up against type here. I can't find the caption, its been chopped off. Any ideas? ] (]) 09:53, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
: Not quite clear what is in the canton of the flag of the xebec, but it certainly could be the Red Ensign.
: In 1804 the Republic of Italy was an ally of France, so either ''Volcan'' was the literal name of the xebec but she was in the hands of an enemy of Italy, or ''Volcan'' is a translation.
: Cheers! ] (]) 14:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
::It's this pic, that shows the ]? Dont know if you saw it? ] (]) 16:08, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
::: Ah yes, the image I saw was lower resolution, this one leaves no doubt. Definitly the British Red Ensign. ] (]) 17:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
::::So far, I haven't been able to find a ''Volcano'' in ''Lloyd's Register'' or ''Lloyd's List''. ] (]) 23:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)


I'm new to contributing to Wikimedia and Misplaced Pages, with a specific interest and focus of mine being Mesoamerican history and archeology, and contributing photos from museums on those topics. I was wanting to get in touch with you regarding advice for taking and processing photos; best practices for how to list and present metadata and information on file pages and via Wikidata, as well as to talk about potentially you taking some photos of specific exhibits in France.
== French Naval Ship at sail ==


Please let me know if you're able or interested to talk about any of this!
Hi Rama, Is there any value to uploading this ? Best regards. ] (]) 09:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
: Hello,
: there is always value in such images, be it for the image itself. Now, of course, I am not sure that I see any French warship on this image, but that is another question...
: Cheers! ] (]) 10:06, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
:: Thanks, I'll leave it for another. If it's a type I woud load it. I don't upload fantasy stuff, knowingly as a rule. ] (]) 14:15, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
==Demerliac request 10 August 2023==
Hi Rama, could you please see if Demerliac has anything on the following two privateers: 1}''Jeune Adele'' in the article {{ship||Pitt|1799 ship}}; 2) ''Legere'', in the article {{ship||Sultana|1787 ship}}?. Thanks, ] (]) 23:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
: Hello,
:* ''Jeune Adèle'' (no 2745, p.321): privateer schooner commissioned in Guadeloupe circa June 1806, with cruises in June, October November of that year under a Captain Le Prieur with 61 men and 14 6-pounders.
:* ''Légère'': not quite certain but she might be no 2590 p.286: privateer from an unknown home port, operating in the Mediterranean from April 1799, captured by HMS ''Flora'' on 28 April 1799.
: Cheers! ] (]) 07:53, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
::Thanks. Both useful, particularly ''Jeune Adele''. It is unusual that we have useful info from the Caribbean. I have added the info to the two articles. Regards, ] (]) 11:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
::: I was impressed to see how much you managed to gather about ''Légère'', you have much more than Demerliac! ] (]) 12:28, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
::::Thanks. I have to credit Google, and particularity Google books. Regard, ] (]) 22:22, 14 August 2023 (UTC)


] (]) 03:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
==Demerliac request 14 August 2023==
==] of ]==
Hi Rama, in 1798, A French privateer named ''Zeliee'', or ''Zele'', captured {{ship||Betsey|1790 ship}}, and I am hoping that Demerliac has something on the privateer. Thanks, ] (]) 22:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
]
:In 1806, the privateer ''Guadaloupienne'' captured {{ship||Ariadne|1795 ship|2}}. Does Demerliac have anything on ''Guadaloupienne''?. Thanks, ] (]) 17:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)


The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under ], this ''']''' will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article.
:: Hello,
::* ''Zélé'' (no 2293, p.263), a privateer from Nantes commissioned in December 1798. Cruise from December 1798 under René-Joseph Salaun until captured by HMS ''Melpomene'' on 28 February 1799.
::* ''Gouadeloupéenne'': I have no ship of that name or close that matches the date, sorry.
:: Cheers! ] (]) 17:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
:::Thanks. A 50% hit rate is not bad for what we are doing. By the way, how would you translate the phrase, "La Zele amarina La Charlotte"? I found a small reference to ''Zele'' in Nicolierre-Teijero's book on the Nantes corsairs, but am not sure how to translate that. Regards, ] (]) 17:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
:::: "''Zélé'' took possession of ''Charlotte''". A rather special sense for "''amariner''" that few native speakers would know, assuming they would know that verb at all. Cheers! ] (]) 18:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
::::Thanks. Thought so. Interestingly, neither Google translate nor Bing had any clue. So clearly, a very unusual use. Nicolierre-Teijero's book was published in 1896, and was specialized, so unsurprising that he used it. Cheers, ] (]) 19:47, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

== ] of ] ==
]


If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp/dated}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Sławomir Zgrzywa|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> ] (]) 17:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
<blockquote>'''This weapon did not exist, Conway's 1922-1946 and French Cruisers 1922-1956 all state Algerie only had the modele 1924. The only "modele 1931" is the turret mounting used on Algerie which is already mentioned in the modele 1924 article. And from going through a few books on the French cruisers, Naval Weapons of World War Two seems to be the only book that actually mentions its existence (Jane's Fighting Ships also mentions an improved gun, but doesn't provide any details other than "better shells and longer range", which the other 2 books (and even Naval Weapons) state is because of newly introduced shells in the late 1920s/early 1930s) and is probably the origin of this misconception'''</blockquote>
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 10:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, ] (]) 10:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)


</div>
==Demerliac request 25 August 2023==
</div>
Hi Rama: in 1807, the French privateer ''General Ferrand'' captured {{ship||Beaver|1796 ship}}. In 1793, the English privateer {{ship||Resolution|1793 privateer}} captured two French vessels, ''St Jean de Lone'', which may have had a letter of marque, and ''Vigie'', which was a privateer. Also, in 1799, ''Resolution'' recaptured a vessel that the French privateer ''Bellona'' had captured. Does Demerliac have anything about these four vessels? Thanks, ] (]) 10:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->
::An editor has suggested that {{ship||Port au Prince|1790 ship}} was the former French privateer ''Général Dumourier''. Can Demerliac shed any light on this? Thanks. ] (]) 23:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
::: Hello,
:::* ''Général Ferrand'': no 2714, p.318: privateer commissioned in Saint-Domingue from December 1806 to April 1807
:::* ''St Jean de Lone'': Nothing about her I fear
:::* ''Vigie'': 2157, p. 251: a privateer schooner from an unknown home port, active in the Channel in 1799 with 71 men and 14 guns. Captured by ''Resolution'' on 25 May 1799.
:::* ''Bellona'': probably named ''Bellone'', but I do not have a compatible entry.
:::* ''Général Dumourier'': I have three entries:
:::** ''Général Dumourier'': no 2337, p.266 was a privateer from Bordeaux under a Captain Bernard Dihins (or Dihinx), with 196 men and 22 6-pounders. A British squadron captured her off the Azores, and brought her to Portsmouth, where she was broken up in search of Spanish gold captured from a galleon that was tough to be hidden on board. A rather romantic story, but that rules her our as a candidate.
:::** ''Général Dumourier'' or ''Grand Dumouriez'': no 2897, p.308 a privateer commissioned at Mauritius in July 1793 under Gabriel-Vincent Burguez
:::** ''Dumourier'': no 2965, p. 314, a privateer from an unknown homeport, commissioned in 1795 with 180 men and 20 guns. She was catpured by HMS ''Phaeton'' in 1795.
::: Demerliac suspects that 2897 and 2965 could in fact be the same ship. Since neither 2337 nor 2965 have fates compatible with what I see in the article, it might be that 2897 was in fact not 2965 and is the ship ''Port au Prince''; or that we are about another ship entirely that went below Demerliac's radar. I am afraid I cannot be more conclusive from these records.
::: Cheers! ] (]) 07:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:45, 19 November 2024

This is Rama's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 31 days 

Archives : 1 - 50 | 51 - 100 | 101 - 150 | 151 - 200 | 201 - 250| 251 - 300 | 301 - 350 | 351 - 400 | 401 - 450 | 451 - 500

more archive 1 (hand-made because something seems broken with the automatic archive)


Museum photography, metadata, and French exhibits

Hello,

I'm new to contributing to Wikimedia and Misplaced Pages, with a specific interest and focus of mine being Mesoamerican history and archeology, and contributing photos from museums on those topics. I was wanting to get in touch with you regarding advice for taking and processing photos; best practices for how to list and present metadata and information on file pages and via Wikidata, as well as to talk about potentially you taking some photos of specific exhibits in France.

Please let me know if you're able or interested to talk about any of this!

MajoraZ (talk) 03:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sławomir Zgrzywa

Notice

The article Sławomir Zgrzywa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Misplaced Pages policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AusLondonder (talk) 17:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Surveillante class frigate default image

Template:Surveillante class frigate default image has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)