| Revision as of 07:38, 12 January 2007 editSwpb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers93,237 edits →Peninsular Northern Railroad← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:51, 19 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,993 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Tawker/Archive 2. (BOT) | ||
| (654 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| {{wikibreak|Tawker}} | |||
| | age =2160 | |||
| | archiveprefix =User talk:Tawker/Archive | |||
| | numberstart =1 | |||
| | maxarchsize =75000 | |||
| | header ={{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
| | minkeepthreads =5 | |||
| | format = %%i | |||
| | archivebox =yes | |||
| | box-advert=yes | |||
| ⚫ | }} | ||
| <!-- Template:Setup cluebot archiving --> | |||
| ⚫ | Older Archives (by month) @ ] | ||
| == BAG membership == | |||
| Ok, ''the bot'' takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- ] 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello. You are listed as a ] but it appears you may not be actively helping in this area anymore. Do you intend to return to BAG-related activity on Misplaced Pages, or are you happy to be removed from this list? — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 12:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
| ]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" | |||
| ::Thanks - yes I have had significant time constraints - I will look to re-engage where I can. -- ] (]) 22:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| |This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by Werdnabot. Any sections older than '''5''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived | |||
| |- | |||
| |}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-5 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Tawker/(!month)07--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| ⚫ | Archives (by month) @ ] | ||
| Hello, | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| ==A request for assistance== | |||
| Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. ] 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC). | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| == AVB is.... not a bot? == | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| Is AntiVandalBot supposed to have a bot flag? ] suggest it doesn't have one (which is odd). If it needs a bot flag, I think you have to get a ] to do it. --] 10:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :No, AVB is '''not''' supposed to be flagged as a bot. Bots do not show up on ] by default and we want to see what AVB is doing. ]] 14:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Ah, that makes sense. Thanks --] 17:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| == My Request for Adminship == | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| {| style="background-color: #339999; border: solid 1px darkcyan;" | |||
| | ] | |||
| | style="background-color: #e8ffff; padding: 1em; border: solid 1px darkcyan;" | Thank you for your support in my ], which passed with a tally of '''117/0/1'''. I hope that my conduct as an ] lives up to the somewhat flattering confidence the community has shown in me. Please don't hesitate to leave a message on ] should you need anything or want to discuss something; though I suspect my commons bit will be of more use for you. By the way you owe Cyde an "apology" for an edit conflict <tt>;)</tt>.--]] (]) 22:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ] | |||
| == More vandalism from User talk:204.13.204.98 on 8 January == | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| It was on the ] page at the bottom. Please do something about this idiot. ] 23:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| == Logo for your AntiVandalBot == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| Hi! Out of enthusiasm about your AntiVandalBot, I made a logo for it. I posted it in AntiVandalBot's user talk page. Could you take a look? Thanks. If you want, you could modify it in any ways you like & maybe take out the "AntiVandalBot" phrase so that it could be applied to all bots in Misplaced Pages. (] 01:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)) | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| == re: escalating warnings left by AntiVandalBot == | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| Good evening. Thanks for the quick response. On the second issue, I'm more than happy to stick with the standard Test1-4 series. That's all I normally use regardless. My question is more one of theoretical possibility. Most of the warning templates have a standardized hidden reference to the template they came from - always in the format <tt><nowiki><!-- Template:Test1 (first level warning) --></nowiki></tt>. I don't know whether it's possible for the bot to read the page's source code to look for that pattern or not. I wouldn't even consider trying to do that myself but I've seen you code things that I would have said were impossible so I figured that it couldn't hurt to ask. | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| Is there some other way that we could add a standardized tag to the most common warning templates so that the bot could recognize them and recommend escalation? Could we switch the template reference from a commented-out line to a line printed in the same color as the background or something? Or, thinking about it more, for this scenario we don't really care about the source template - maybe we only white-text the (first level warning) and ask the bot to search for that specific text in the last 5 lines of the user's page before appending the warning... | |||
| ] | |||
| Again, this would be useful but is not essential. The tool is doing a lot of good work already. I'm just feeling greedy... Balance my greed against the evils of feature-creep. Thanks again. ] <small>]</small> 00:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| == Peninsular Northern Railroad == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
| AntiVandalBot reverted my edit to ] () as vandalism, and left me a message to that effect. In actuality, I was attempting to redirect the page per the result of its AfD discussion, but accidentally left out the hash mark. When I went to fix it a few seconds after the initial edit, I hit an edit conflict with AntiVandalBot, which was reverting my edit. Perhaps you could consider adding a slight time delay, maybe 30-45 seconds, to avoid these sorts of situations. Thanks, — ] <sup>''] ]''</sup> 02:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| :That makes sense. — ] <sup>''] ]''</sup> 07:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 18:51, 19 November 2024
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Older Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives
BAG membership
Hello. You are listed as a member of the Bot Approvals Group but it appears you may not be actively helping in this area anymore. Do you intend to return to BAG-related activity on Misplaced Pages, or are you happy to be removed from this list? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks - yes I have had significant time constraints - I will look to re-engage where I can. -- Tawker (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)