| Revision as of 15:36, 15 January 2007 editWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 3 sections to User talk:Tawker/Jan07← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:51, 19 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,976 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Tawker/Archive 2. (BOT) | ||
| (641 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| {{wikibreak|Tawker}} | |||
| | age =2160 | |||
| | archiveprefix =User talk:Tawker/Archive | |||
| | numberstart =1 | |||
| | maxarchsize =75000 | |||
| | header ={{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
| | minkeepthreads =5 | |||
| | format = %%i | |||
| | archivebox =yes | |||
| | box-advert=yes | |||
| }} | |||
| <!-- Template:Setup cluebot archiving --> | |||
| Older Archives (by month) @ ] | |||
| == BAG membership == | |||
| Ok, ''the bot'' takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- ] 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello. You are listed as a ] but it appears you may not be actively helping in this area anymore. Do you intend to return to BAG-related activity on Misplaced Pages, or are you happy to be removed from this list? — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 12:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
| ]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" | |||
| ::Thanks - yes I have had significant time constraints - I will look to re-engage where I can. -- ] (]) 22:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| |This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by Werdnabot. Any sections older than '''5''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived | |||
| |- | |||
| |}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-5 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Tawker/(!month)07--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| Archives (by month) @ ] | |||
| Hello, | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| ==A request for assistance== | |||
| Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. ] 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC). | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| == re: escalating warnings left by AntiVandalBot == | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| Good evening. Thanks for the quick response. On the second issue, I'm more than happy to stick with the standard Test1-4 series. That's all I normally use regardless. My question is more one of theoretical possibility. Most of the warning templates have a standardized hidden reference to the template they came from - always in the format <tt><nowiki><!-- Template:Test1 (first level warning) --></nowiki></tt>. I don't know whether it's possible for the bot to read the page's source code to look for that pattern or not. I wouldn't even consider trying to do that myself but I've seen you code things that I would have said were impossible so I figured that it couldn't hurt to ask. | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| Is there some other way that we could add a standardized tag to the most common warning templates so that the bot could recognize them and recommend escalation? Could we switch the template reference from a commented-out line to a line printed in the same color as the background or something? Or, thinking about it more, for this scenario we don't really care about the source template - maybe we only white-text the (first level warning) and ask the bot to search for that specific text in the last 5 lines of the user's page before appending the warning... | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| Again, this would be useful but is not essential. The tool is doing a lot of good work already. I'm just feeling greedy... Balance my greed against the evils of feature-creep. Thanks again. ] <small>]</small> 00:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Peninsular Northern Railroad == | |||
| AntiVandalBot reverted my edit to ] () as vandalism, and left me a message to that effect. In actuality, I was attempting to redirect the page per the result of its AfD discussion, but accidentally left out the hash mark. When I went to fix it a few seconds after the initial edit, I hit an edit conflict with AntiVandalBot, which was reverting my edit. Perhaps you could consider adding a slight time delay, maybe 30-45 seconds, to avoid these sorts of situations. Thanks, — ] <sup>''] ]''</sup> 02:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| == A very Californian RfA thanks from ] == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| {| width="90%" style="border:4px solid black; background:#f2f2ff; padding:3px; cellspacing:10px;" align=center | |||
| | <div style="border:1px solid black; background:white; padding:0px; width:150px;">]</div> | |||
| | valign="top" |Thanks for your support in my ''']''', which succeeded with a '''final tally''' of '''(97/4/4)'''! I've never been able to accept compliments gracefully, and the heavy support from this outstanding community left me at a complete loss for words -- so, a ''very belated'' ] for all of your kind words. | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| I have done and will continue to do the utmost to serve the community in this new capacity, wherever it may take me, and to set an example others might wish to follow in. With a little luck and a lot of ], this may be enough. Maybe someday the enwiki admins of the future will look back and say, "Yeah, ] was an admin." Hopefully then they don't start talking about the ''explosive'' ArbComm case I got tied into and ''oh what a drama that was'', but we'll see, won't we? | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| Surely some of you have seen me in action by now; with that in mind, I openly invite and welcome any feedback ] or ] -- help me become the best editor and sysop I can be. | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| :<big>'''''Again, thank you. –]'''''</big> | |||
| |} | |||
| :Ah, where would we be without Tawker? Count me in as a fan, both for AVB and WikipediaWeekly. Glad to have you around. Thanks for your trust. ] 13:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| ==]== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
| Page is up on Google for months and someone is repeatedly changing same out of spite and sinister/vandalism mindset. | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| Chir_73 is the admin. that protected same. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| My counsel is informed. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| My publicist is informed. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Please ban users that violate the rules. | |||
| </div> | |||
| Re-instate the page. | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| Lee Nysted, Owner; Managing Partner | |||
| NystedMusic, LLC. | |||
| www.NystedMusic.com | |||
| Lee@NystedMusic.com | |||
| www.MySpace.com/LeeNysted | |||
| www.isound.com/lee_nysted | |||
| Legal Counsel: | |||
| Frank W. Pirruccello, Esq. | |||
| www.Musiclaw1.com (''by ]'') | |||
| ::Fixed the addition to your talk page. FYI, with Chir_73 the user meant me, and no, I did not protect the page, just deleted it. -- ] | ] 18:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] again == | |||
| Having deleted this yet again myself, and recieving threats of banning and legal action as a result, I restored it and sent it to AfD in the hope that the creator/subject would accept consensus rather than repeating his threats on the talk page of every administrator involved. If you're deleted and protecting it again, could you please explain this on the AfD? Thanks – ] 20:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Done, from what I've read the subject wanted the article deleted as vandals were posting false info, hence the delete and salt. -- ] 22:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Dear Tawker, I have unblocked this user per discussion on ]. Feel free to drop a hammer on my head if you disagree. Regards, — ] 13:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I was wondering why you deleted ], since your summary was only ''(delete...)''. Shouldn't it be a redirect to ] instead, since a number of pages still link to it? Thanks. ] 19:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, I'm trying to figure out an AVB login issue, I should set that redirect.... -- ] 20:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:51, 19 November 2024
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Older Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives
BAG membership
Hello. You are listed as a member of the Bot Approvals Group but it appears you may not be actively helping in this area anymore. Do you intend to return to BAG-related activity on Misplaced Pages, or are you happy to be removed from this list? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks - yes I have had significant time constraints - I will look to re-engage where I can. -- Tawker (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)