Misplaced Pages

Talk:The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:33, 18 October 2005 edit198.31.162.65 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:01, 23 November 2024 edit undoQuicoleJR (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers14,656 edits Notification: listing of Fado (character) at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
(455 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|1=
{{cvgproj}}
{{WikiProject Video games|class=GA|importance=high|Nintendo=yes}}
{{oldpeerreview}}
}}{{Merged-from|The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker Soundtrack|11 March 2008|talk=no}}
{{Article history
|action1=PR
|action1date=05 October 2005
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker/archive1
|action1result=reviewed
|action1oldid=24483379
<!--This article was rated GA in 2006 by a blocked account which added the {{GA}} tag to several articles without review. The oldid for this false contribution is 36609106 False GAN is remarked out.
|action2=GAN
|action2date=25 Jan 2006
|action2result=listed
|action2oldid=36670467
-->
|action2=WPR
|action2date=02 February 2006
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Computer and video games/Peer review/The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker
|action2result=reviewed
|action2oldid=37898572


|action3=FAC
Can someone include the original screenshots of when this was first shown off at spaceworld? Link looked even more stylized then he does in the final game.
|action3date=9 Feb 2006
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker
|action3result=promoted
|action3oldid=38859836


|action4=FAR
:Will look into this if I remember to. I guess publicly-released screenshots have no copyright, right? (], 12:10, 13 Apr 2005, GMT)
|action4date=14 July 2006
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker
|action4result=kept
|action4oldid=63336501


|action5=FTC
I wouldnt say the art style was anything close to anime-style, in fact that's why i -didn't- like it so much. I mean if that's chibi, then so is every 'toon' in america.
|action5date=22:54, 4 May 2008
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic candidates/The Legend of Zelda titles
|action5result=promoted
|action5oldid=209269438


|action6=FTR
First of all, the wording of the first paragraph is a bit wrong: "(...) the introduction of new items such as the Grappling Hook and Deku Leaf were added."
|action6date=21:05, 31 March 2010
I suppose technically there weren't any introductions before, but I doubt that's what the sentence is meant to say.
|action6link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic removal candidates/The Legend of Zelda titles/archive1
Secondly, I'm pretty sure Ocarina of Time already featured a Grappling Hook, although it might have a different function now...? ]
|action6result=demoted
|action6oldid=351811049


|action7=FAR
:Yes, there have been grappling devices before--ALttP introduced the Hookshot that has since featured in later games--but the Grappling Hook in this case is a proper "hook" with rope and all, and probably operates differently (I've never played TWW). But certainly a mention could be made that it's the intellectual descendant of the Hookshot.
|action7date=15:29, 15 May 2012
:Remember, the idea with Misplaced Pages is that if you see something wrong you can change it. Just feel free to correct anything and everything to the way you want it, and if others don't like an edit they'll change it some more. Just ] and go wild! :) ]<sup>]</sup> 6 July 2005 21:59 (UTC)
|action7link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker/archive1
::The hookshot is in ''TWW'' as well. The grappling hook has a three pronged claw and can be used for either hooking round branches or similar features and swinging from them, or thrown at enemies to steal spoils, hearts and other things. It can also be used on the boat to pull up treasure chests from the sea floor. The hookshot is pretty much the same as in ''OoT'' and ''MM'' from what I recall. ] 7 July 2005 07:24 (UTC)
|action7result=removed
:::By now I have almost finished TWW and discovered the Hookshot as well. I didn't realise it was included, and something different from the Grappling Hook (although like Ian Moody mentioned, it does work differently). The only other Zelda I played is OOT, quite a while ago, and I think you started out with a Hookshot, later upgraded to a Longshot, both different from the GH. I am ignorant no more. :) (I'm going to edit the strange sentence now.)
|action7oldid=491303068


| action8 = GAN
About the WW second quest.. Are there any other differences from the first other than the clothes of link and his sis, the DX camera, location of treasures, and the ability to understand Hylian? Do any of those things make the game worth playing again? I'm just a Zelda fanboy who needs to know!! Thanks ] 08:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
| action8date = 07:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
| action8link = /GA1
| action8result = Listed
| action8oldid = 790949576
| topic = video games
| currentstatus = GA


|maindate=November 26, 2011
== Wikibooks ==
}}{{refideas
|1=https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/miyamoto-initially-cringed-at-wind-wakers-art-style-and-asked-for-a-redesign-its-claimed/
|2=https://web.archive.org/web/20141009052639/http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/2633/features/zelda-the-man-behind-the-legend/?page=2
|3=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008002404/http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/54925/features/eiji-aonuma-interview-zelda-wind-waker-hd-was-challenging/
|4=https://archive.org/details/nintendo-dream-january-21-2003-01-21-vol-082-600dpi-ozidual/Nintendo%20Dream%202003%2001%2021%20v082%20%28J%20OCR%29/page/n15/mode/2up (interview)
|5={{cite web|first=Paula|last=Parisi|url=https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=GPS&u=wikipedia&id=GALE%7CA121283480&v=2.1&it=r&sid=bookmark-GPS&asid=338d29b3|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20240903113501/https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=GPS&u=wikipedia&id=GALE%7CA121283480&v=2.1&it=r&sid=bookmark-GPS&asid=338d29b3|title=Game points|magazine=]|archivedate=September 3, 2024|date=August 10, 2004|accessdate=|via=]}}
}}


{{Archives}}
{{wikibooks|The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker}} ] is in need of serious work. I have fixed some of the lists, but the main text of the walkthrough contains many inappropriate comments, language and needless spoilers. Lots of help is needed! ~ ] ] 01:17, 2005 July 20 (UTC)

== Intro edits ==

I've twice reverted parts of the recent edits to the introduction. The reason is that the previous version read better than the changes. Specifically:
*The following sentence is phrased awkwardly: "The element of ] has a prominent role, by facilitating sailing and being controlled with a magic conductor's baton called the Wind Waker."
*The following sentence introduces passive voice: "Instead, a distinctive cartoon-like art style was created through ], originating the ']' character." (I also don't think the sentence benefits from being broken up).
*Calling the art direction "whimsical": I don't think this is the right word choice. At any rate the previous paragraph already establishes what the art direction is like.
*The article verifies that the divisiveness among North American players contributed to weaker sales in comparison to Ocarina of Time, in fact this is a pretty significant part of the game's history. Removing that hurts the flow.
*"As a result, the subsequent '']'' (2006) has a more natural and serious look." This doesn't flow right. As a result of what exactly? As a result ''of comparatively weak sales'', Nintendo changed directions with the visuals. As a result of that decision, Twilight Princess has a more realistic style (I don't think that "natural and serious" are the right word choices)
*Splitting the sentence on the character's allies and activities strikes me as unnecessary, but I'm open to this if others support the change.
There are some good changes that I'll restore, and others that should be made. In general this introduction has suffered from content creep over the years; I'll get to work on fixing that.--] ]/] 20:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

== Would this still classify as GameCube-Only? ==

I'm aware that the two versions (OG and HD) have separate articles, but at the end of the day they're the same game at its core. Pages where the remasters are merged with the original game (] and ]) don't have either marked as exclusive for their respective consoles (Xenoblade's remaster in particular has WAY more identity than Wind Waker's in my eyes). I could totally be wrong with this thinking, and if I am, I'd appreciate a link to Misplaced Pages's policies on remakes (if such a page even exists). Thanks for reading! | ] (]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added 22:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 14#Zelda 10}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 14:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 23#Fado (character)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 03:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:01, 23 November 2024

This article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconVideo games: Nintendo High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks
AfDs Merge discussions Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Good article nominations DYK nominations Reviews and reassessments
Articles that need...
The contents of the The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker Soundtrack page were merged into The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker on 11 March 2008. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history.
Former featured articleThe Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleThe Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 26, 2011.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 5, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
February 2, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
February 9, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
July 14, 2006Featured article reviewKept
May 4, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
March 31, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
May 15, 2012Featured article reviewDemoted
July 18, 2017Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Former featured article, current good article
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Archives
Archive 1

Intro edits

I've twice reverted parts of the recent edits to the introduction. The reason is that the previous version read better than the changes. Specifically:

  • The following sentence is phrased awkwardly: "The element of wind has a prominent role, by facilitating sailing and being controlled with a magic conductor's baton called the Wind Waker."
  • The following sentence introduces passive voice: "Instead, a distinctive cartoon-like art style was created through cel shading, originating the 'Toon Link' character." (I also don't think the sentence benefits from being broken up).
  • Calling the art direction "whimsical": I don't think this is the right word choice. At any rate the previous paragraph already establishes what the art direction is like.
  • The article verifies that the divisiveness among North American players contributed to weaker sales in comparison to Ocarina of Time, in fact this is a pretty significant part of the game's history. Removing that hurts the flow.
  • "As a result, the subsequent Twilight Princess (2006) has a more natural and serious look." This doesn't flow right. As a result of what exactly? As a result of comparatively weak sales, Nintendo changed directions with the visuals. As a result of that decision, Twilight Princess has a more realistic style (I don't think that "natural and serious" are the right word choices)
  • Splitting the sentence on the character's allies and activities strikes me as unnecessary, but I'm open to this if others support the change.

There are some good changes that I'll restore, and others that should be made. In general this introduction has suffered from content creep over the years; I'll get to work on fixing that.--Cúchullain /c 20:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Would this still classify as GameCube-Only?

I'm aware that the two versions (OG and HD) have separate articles, but at the end of the day they're the same game at its core. Pages where the remasters are merged with the original game (Xenoblade Chronicles (video game) and Skies of Arcadia) don't have either marked as exclusive for their respective consoles (Xenoblade's remaster in particular has WAY more identity than Wind Waker's in my eyes). I could totally be wrong with this thinking, and if I am, I'd appreciate a link to Misplaced Pages's policies on remakes (if such a page even exists). Thanks for reading! | NJ (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

"Zelda 10" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Zelda 10 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 14 § Zelda 10 until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

"Fado (character)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Fado (character) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 23 § Fado (character) until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 03:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories: