| Revision as of 00:20, 9 December 2005 editDcoetzee (talk | contribs)37,529 edits WW second quest← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 03:01, 23 November 2024 edit undoQuicoleJR (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers14,657 edits Notification: listing of Fado (character) at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle |
| (451 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|1= |
|
{{cvgproj}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Video games|class=GA|importance=high|Nintendo=yes}} |
|
{{oldpeerreview}} |
|
|
|
}}{{Merged-from|The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker Soundtrack|11 March 2008|talk=no}} |
|
|
{{Article history |
|
|
|action1=PR |
|
|
|action1date=05 October 2005 |
|
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker/archive1 |
|
|
|action1result=reviewed |
|
|
|action1oldid=24483379 |
|
|
<!--This article was rated GA in 2006 by a blocked account which added the {{GA}} tag to several articles without review. The oldid for this false contribution is 36609106 False GAN is remarked out. |
|
|
|action2=GAN |
|
|
|action2date=25 Jan 2006 |
|
|
|action2result=listed |
|
|
|action2oldid=36670467 |
|
|
--> |
|
|
|action2=WPR |
|
|
|action2date=02 February 2006 |
|
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Computer and video games/Peer review/The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker |
|
|
|action2result=reviewed |
|
|
|action2oldid=37898572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action3=FAC |
|
Can someone include the original screenshots of when this was first shown off at spaceworld? Link looked even more stylized then he does in the final game. |
|
|
|
|action3date=9 Feb 2006 |
|
|
|action3link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker |
|
|
|action3result=promoted |
|
|
|action3oldid=38859836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action4=FAR |
|
:Will look into this if I remember to. I guess publicly-released screenshots have no copyright, right? (], 12:10, 13 Apr 2005, GMT) |
|
|
|
|action4date=14 July 2006 |
|
|
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker |
|
|
|action4result=kept |
|
|
|action4oldid=63336501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action5=FTC |
|
::Misplaced Pages policy is that screenshots inherently fall under fair use. ] 23:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action5date=22:54, 4 May 2008 |
|
|
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic candidates/The Legend of Zelda titles |
|
|
|action5result=promoted |
|
|
|action5oldid=209269438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action6=FTR |
|
I wouldnt say the art style was anything close to anime-style, in fact that's why i -didn't- like it so much. I mean if that's chibi, then so is every 'toon' in america. |
|
|
|
|action6date=21:05, 31 March 2010 |
|
|
|action6link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic removal candidates/The Legend of Zelda titles/archive1 |
|
|
|action6result=demoted |
|
|
|action6oldid=351811049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action7=FAR |
|
First of all, the wording of the first paragraph is a bit wrong: "(...) the introduction of new items such as the Grappling Hook and Deku Leaf were added." |
|
|
|
|action7date=15:29, 15 May 2012 |
|
I suppose technically there weren't any introductions before, but I doubt that's what the sentence is meant to say. |
|
|
|
|action7link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker/archive1 |
|
Secondly, I'm pretty sure Ocarina of Time already featured a Grappling Hook, although it might have a different function now...? ] |
|
|
|
|action7result=removed |
|
|
|action7oldid=491303068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| action8 = GAN |
|
:Yes, there have been grappling devices before--ALttP introduced the Hookshot that has since featured in later games--but the Grappling Hook in this case is a proper "hook" with rope and all, and probably operates differently (I've never played TWW). But certainly a mention could be made that it's the intellectual descendant of the Hookshot. |
|
|
|
| action8date = 07:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC) |
|
:Remember, the idea with Misplaced Pages is that if you see something wrong you can change it. Just feel free to correct anything and everything to the way you want it, and if others don't like an edit they'll change it some more. Just ] and go wild! :) ]<sup>]</sup> 6 July 2005 21:59 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action8link = /GA1 |
|
::The hookshot is in ''TWW'' as well. The grappling hook has a three pronged claw and can be used for either hooking round branches or similar features and swinging from them, or thrown at enemies to steal spoils, hearts and other things. It can also be used on the boat to pull up treasure chests from the sea floor. The hookshot is pretty much the same as in ''OoT'' and ''MM'' from what I recall. ] 7 July 2005 07:24 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| action8result = Listed |
|
:::By now I have almost finished TWW and discovered the Hookshot as well. I didn't realise it was included, and something different from the Grappling Hook (although like Ian Moody mentioned, it does work differently). The only other Zelda I played is OOT, quite a while ago, and I think you started out with a Hookshot, later upgraded to a Longshot, both different from the GH. I am ignorant no more. :) (I'm going to edit the strange sentence now.) |
|
|
|
| action8oldid = 790949576 |
|
|
| topic = video games |
|
|
| currentstatus = GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|maindate=November 26, 2011 |
|
About the WW second quest.. Are there any other differences from the first other than the clothes of link and his sis, the DX camera, location of treasures, and the ability to understand Hylian? Do any of those things make the game worth playing again? I'm just a Zelda fanboy who needs to know!! Thanks ] 08:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC) hey everybody! i added the names of islands on a map supplied by www.z64planet.com (p.s u guys rock!) damn! wouldnt work! 0 well cyaz! |
|
|
|
}}{{refideas |
|
|
|1=https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/miyamoto-initially-cringed-at-wind-wakers-art-style-and-asked-for-a-redesign-its-claimed/ |
|
|
|2=https://web.archive.org/web/20141009052639/http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/2633/features/zelda-the-man-behind-the-legend/?page=2 |
|
|
|3=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008002404/http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/54925/features/eiji-aonuma-interview-zelda-wind-waker-hd-was-challenging/ |
|
|
|4=https://archive.org/details/nintendo-dream-january-21-2003-01-21-vol-082-600dpi-ozidual/Nintendo%20Dream%202003%2001%2021%20v082%20%28J%20OCR%29/page/n15/mode/2up (interview) |
|
|
|5={{cite web|first=Paula|last=Parisi|url=https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=GPS&u=wikipedia&id=GALE%7CA121283480&v=2.1&it=r&sid=bookmark-GPS&asid=338d29b3|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20240903113501/https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=GPS&u=wikipedia&id=GALE%7CA121283480&v=2.1&it=r&sid=bookmark-GPS&asid=338d29b3|title=Game points|magazine=]|archivedate=September 3, 2024|date=August 10, 2004|accessdate=|via=]}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Archives}} |
|
:I think the clothes and Hylian alone was reason enough to replay, especially when the game's so much fun in the first place, but each to their own. ] 00:20, 9 December 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Wikibooks == |
|
== Intro edits == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've twice reverted parts of the recent edits to the introduction. The reason is that the previous version read better than the changes. Specifically: |
|
{{wikibooks|The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker}} ] is in need of serious work. I have fixed some of the lists, but the main text of the walkthrough contains many inappropriate comments, language and needless spoilers. Lots of help is needed! ~ ] ] 01:17, 2005 July 20 (UTC) |
|
|
|
*The following sentence is phrased awkwardly: "The element of ] has a prominent role, by facilitating sailing and being controlled with a magic conductor's baton called the Wind Waker." |
|
|
*The following sentence introduces passive voice: "Instead, a distinctive cartoon-like art style was created through ], originating the ']' character." (I also don't think the sentence benefits from being broken up). |
|
|
*Calling the art direction "whimsical": I don't think this is the right word choice. At any rate the previous paragraph already establishes what the art direction is like. |
|
|
*The article verifies that the divisiveness among North American players contributed to weaker sales in comparison to Ocarina of Time, in fact this is a pretty significant part of the game's history. Removing that hurts the flow. |
|
|
*"As a result, the subsequent '']'' (2006) has a more natural and serious look." This doesn't flow right. As a result of what exactly? As a result ''of comparatively weak sales'', Nintendo changed directions with the visuals. As a result of that decision, Twilight Princess has a more realistic style (I don't think that "natural and serious" are the right word choices) |
|
|
*Splitting the sentence on the character's allies and activities strikes me as unnecessary, but I'm open to this if others support the change. |
|
|
There are some good changes that I'll restore, and others that should be made. In general this introduction has suffered from content creep over the years; I'll get to work on fixing that.--] ]/] 20:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Would this still classify as GameCube-Only? == |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm aware that the two versions (OG and HD) have separate articles, but at the end of the day they're the same game at its core. Pages where the remasters are merged with the original game (] and ]) don't have either marked as exclusive for their respective consoles (Xenoblade's remaster in particular has WAY more identity than Wind Waker's in my eyes). I could totally be wrong with this thinking, and if I am, I'd appreciate a link to Misplaced Pages's policies on remakes (if such a page even exists). Thanks for reading! | ] (]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added 22:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
|
] |
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 14#Zelda 10}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 14:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
|
] |
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 23#Fado (character)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 03:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC) |
I've twice reverted parts of the recent edits to the introduction. The reason is that the previous version read better than the changes. Specifically:
There are some good changes that I'll restore, and others that should be made. In general this introduction has suffered from content creep over the years; I'll get to work on fixing that.--Cúchullain /c 20:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
I'm aware that the two versions (OG and HD) have separate articles, but at the end of the day they're the same game at its core. Pages where the remasters are merged with the original game (Xenoblade Chronicles (video game) and Skies of Arcadia) don't have either marked as exclusive for their respective consoles (Xenoblade's remaster in particular has WAY more identity than Wind Waker's in my eyes). I could totally be wrong with this thinking, and if I am, I'd appreciate a link to Misplaced Pages's policies on remakes (if such a page even exists). Thanks for reading! | NJ (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The redirect Zelda 10 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 14 § Zelda 10 until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)