Misplaced Pages

Van Tuong Nguyen: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:07, 1 December 2005 editLonghair (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users168,009 edits cat← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:15, 23 November 2024 edit undoGuccizBud (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,326 editsm Australian Government: Copy edit ▸ Grammar in direct quote.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App select source 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Australian salesman convicted of drug trafficking in Singapore}}
<!-- NOTE TO EDITORS: DO NOT EDIT ATICLE TO PAST TENSE UNTIL THERE IS OFFICIAL CONFIRMATION OF THE EXECUTION IN THE MEDIA. -->
{{For|the 19th century Vietnamese politician|Nguyen Van Tuong}}
{{Redirect|Van Nguyen|the chess grandmaster|Thai Dai Van Nguyen|the poker player|Van Nguyen (poker player)}}
{{pp-move-indef}}
{{family name hatnote|Nguyễn|Vân|lang=Vietnamese}}
{{Use Australian English|date=October 2016}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2018}}
{{Infobox criminal
| name = Nguyen Tuong-van
| image_name = Van Tuong Nguyen.jpg
| image_size = 200px
| image_caption = Van Tuong Nguyen's ]
| birth_date = {{Birth date|1980|8|17|df=y}}
| birth_place = ], ]
| death_date = {{Death date and age|2005|12|2|1980|8|17|df=y}}
| death_place = ], ], ]
| alias =
| conviction = ]
| conviction_penalty = ] (x26)
| conviction_status = ]
| occupation =
| spouse =
| parents =
| children =
| death_cause = ]
}}


'''Van Tuong Nguyen''' (]: ''Nguyễn Tường Vân'', {{audio|Nguyen Tuong Van.ogg|listen|help=no}}; 17 August 1980 – 2 December 2005), ] '''Caleb''',<ref name=letters>{{Cite news|url=http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2005/11/26/1132966006680.html|title=Loving son's letters from death row|date=27 November 2005|access-date=26 July 2006|work=The Age | location=Melbourne, Australia}}</ref> was an Australian from ] convicted of drug trafficking in ]. A ], he was also addressed as '''Nguyen Tuong-van''' (阮祥雲) in the Singaporean media, his name in ], as well as in most Asian customs.
{{Australian_crime}}
{{currentevent}}
]
'''Van Tuong Nguyen''' (]: '''Nguyễn Tường Vân''', born ], ]) is a ]-]n convicted of ] in ]. His crime carries a mandatory death sentence under the ]. Despite pleas of ] from the ] and others he faces execution by ] at 6 {{AM}} ] (9 {{AM}} ]) on ] ].


] carries a mandatory ] under ], and despite pleas for ] from the ], ], the ], as well as other individuals and groups, he was ] by ] at 06:06 ] on 2 December 2005 at ] (22:06 ], 1 December 2005).
==Arrest==
On ] ] Nguyen was on his first trip overseas from Australia since immigration from Thailand as a child. After a flight from ], ], he was in transit at Gate C22 of ] awaiting a connecting flight to ], ]. When attempting to board his connecting flight his metal-rimmed sunglasses triggered a metal detector and two packets of heroin from Cambodia were found, one strapped to his body and another inside his hand luggage.


==Trials== ==Biography==
Van Tuong Nguyen and his twin brother, Dang Khoa Nguyen, were born in a ] at ] in ] to ] parents.<ref name="SMH">{{cite web|url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/meaning-of-life-found-on-death-row/2005/12/02/1133422079494.html|title=Meaning of life found on death row|date=2 December 2005|work=Sydney Morning Herald}}</ref> He did not know his father until 2001 when he travelled from the United States to Australia.<ref name="SMH"/> His mother, Kim, is ] and migrated to Australia shortly after the boys' birth.<ref name="SMH"/> In 1987, she married a Vietnamese-Australian who beat them often, according to Nguyen.<ref name="SMH"/>
] alleged that Nguyen was in possession of 396.2 grams of ], more than 25 times the amount of 15 grams that mandates a death sentence under the ]. The ] sentenced Nguyen to death for this crime on ] ].
Throughout his trial, Nguyen claimed that he was only carrying the drugs in a bid to pay off debts owed by his twin brother, Khoa (a former heroin addict), who had borrowed around AU$25,000 to help defend himself against drugs and violent offences charges three years previously.


Van was educated at St Ignatius School in ], St Joseph's Primary School in ] and ].<ref name="SMH"/> After leaving school at 18, he intended to study at ], but financial difficulties led him to work as a store clerk, door-to-door salesman, computer salesman and research marketer.<ref name="SMH"/>
Nguyen had no previous criminal record. In his police statement, he admitted that he knew he was transporting heroin but added that he had feared for the safety of his family and that prevented him from backing away from the assignment.


Van started his own computer sales business in 1999.<ref name="SMH"/> After his brother Khoa got into legal trouble, Van wound up the business.<ref name="SMH"/> He then found a sales, research and marketing job and earned between ]1,500 to A$2,500 a month (depending on how much commission he received).<ref name="SMH"/> He subsequently took long leave between June and December 2002. In his confession, he stated he was on "medication for acne that required 4 months leave".<ref name="SMH"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mrnguyen.com/weblog/data/nguyen_tuong_van.txt |title=Public Prosecutor vs Nguyen Tuong Van |access-date=1 July 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061113144647/http://www.mrnguyen.com/weblog/data/nguyen_tuong_van.txt |archive-date=13 November 2006 }}</ref>
While in Cambodia to collect the drugs he met the suppliers and confessed to smoking heroin with them twice &mdash; although he says this was under duress from his heroin supplier.


==Drug trafficking==
Since his conviction, he has been held on ] in ].
Throughout his trial, Van claimed that he was carrying the drugs in a bid to pay off debts amounting to approximately A$20,000 to A$25,000 that he owed and to repay legal fees his twin brother Khoa (a former heroin addict) had incurred in defending drug-trafficking and other criminal charges including an attack on a ] youth with a ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Nguyen's twin found guilty in samurai sword attack |url=https://www.thestar.com.my/news/regional/2005/12/04/nguyens-twin-found-guilty-in-samurai-sword-attack |access-date=2022-11-30 |website=The Star |language=en}}</ref> In addition to his own financial troubles, Van said he tried to help pay his twin brother's debt of A$12,000. His twin brother's loan had to be repaid by the end of 2002. Van could afford to repay only A$4,000, the interest on the loan.{{cn|date=October 2024}}


By October 2002, Van had been out of a job for four months and sustaining expenses which included interest on the loan and personal living costs, all totaling A$580 a month. In November 2002, Nguyen was contacted by a Chinese man named "Tan", who told him to travel to Sydney to meet a Vietnamese man named "Sun". Sun proposed that he would repay Nguyen's loans if Nguyen transported packages from Cambodia back to Melbourne and possibly Sydney, via Singapore. The man said the packages contained "white", which Nguyen understood to be heroin.{{cn|date=October 2024}}
An appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed on ]].


It was Van's first trip overseas from Australia since his immigration. He reached ] at midday on 3 December 2002 after leaving Sydney in the evening of the previous day. He met with a Cambodian man at the Lucky Burger restaurant on 4 December and was taken by car to a garage where he was forced to ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.singaporelawwatch.sg/Portals/0/Docs/Judgments/%20SGHC%2054.pdf |title=''Public Prosecutor v Nguyen Tuong Van'' SGHC 54 }}</ref> The following day, Van met his associates at the Lucky Burger and was again taken to the garage and ordered by the men to consume heroin, perhaps to help them determine if he was an undercover police officer. Van was instructed to stay in Phnom Penh until 10 December, at which point he was to meet at the Lucky Burger.{{cn|date=October 2024}}
==Pleas for Clemency==
A plea for clemency by the ] was rejected in ]. The Australian government abolished the ] in 1985, with the ] being in 1967. Australians, including members of Federal and state parliaments, are currently appealing for the decision to be reconsidered and clemency to be granted. If he is hanged, it will be the first execution of an Australian in ] since ], when ] was hanged in ] for drug trafficking.
]


On 8 December, he decided to fly to ]. On 10 December he returned to Phnom Penh, but missed his scheduled meeting at the Lucky Burger. On 11 December he was taken to the garage, where he was then instructed on how to crush heroin bricks and to strap the powdered drug packages to his body. The rest of the day was spent crushing and packaging the drugs in his hotel room. He checked out of the hotel the next day and went to the airport.
On ] ], Nguyen's family received a registered letter from the Singapore Prisons Department. It contained notice of his scheduled ] on ] ].


===Arrest and conviction===
On the same day at the ] Summit in ], Australia's Prime Minister ] made a last appeal on Nguyen's behalf to ] ]. The letter of notice by that time, however, had already been delivered to Nguyen's mother. Howard later said he was "very disappointed" Lee did not tell him of Nguyen's execution date during their morning meeting.
On boarding his flight to ] after a four-hour stopover at ], Van triggered a ]. A package of heroin from Cambodia was found strapped to his body. After the first package was discovered, Van informed the airport official about a second package in his luggage.


Van confessed to have in his possession 396.2g of heroin, more than 26 times the amount of heroin that mandates a death sentence under the ] (import or export of heroin of more than 15&nbsp;grams). The ] sentenced Van to death for this crime on 20 March 2004. After he was convicted, Van was held on ] in ].
Lee apologised to Howard in a phone call later that night, explaining that the letter sent to Mrs Nguyen had arrived a day earlier than anticipated. Singapore Foreign Affairs Minister ] also conveyed his apologies to his counterpart ].


An appeal to the ] was rejected on 20 October 2004.
Nguyen's lawyers arrived in Singapore on ] ] to inform their client of his impending execution date.


Van's family received a registered letter from the ], notifying of his scheduled ] on 2 December 2005.{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}}
On ] ] the Australian Government was considering a request made by Nguyen Tuong Van's lawyers to apply for a hearing at the ]. This would require the Singaporean government's agreement to its jurisdiction. However, Australian Foreign Minister ] considers it unlikely that the Singaporean government would agree to this. {{ref|DownerComment}}


===Pleas for clemency===
In a letter to the Mr David Hawker, the Speaker of the ] in Canberra, Mr Abdullah Tarmugi, the Speaker of the ] wrote "He was caught in possession of almost 400g of pure heroin, enough for more than 26,000 doses of heroin for drug addicts", "He knew what he was doing and the consequences of his actions." Speaking on behalf of the Singapore Government, Tarmugi said: "We are unable to condone Mr Nguyen's actions. As representatives of the people, we have an obligation to protect the lives of those who could be ruined by the drugs he was carrying."
After his sentencing in March 2004, anti-death-penalty campaigners were reported to be inundated with emails from Australians offering support for Van.<ref>{{Cite news|date=23 March 2004|title=Hundreds offer help for condemned Australian|work=Sydney Morning Herald|agency=AAP|url=http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/03/23/1079939630747.html|access-date=26 July 2006}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last1=Butcher|first1=Steve|last2=Marino|first2=Melissa|date=24 March 2004|title=Fight to save condemned man gathers support|work=The Age|agency=AAP|location=Melbourne|url=http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/03/23/1079939645448.html|access-date=26 July 2006}}</ref> Politicians<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Grattan|first1=Michelle|last2=Munro|first2=Ian|date=24 November 2005|title=Airline row link to Nguyen|work=The Age|location=Melbourne|url=http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2005/11/23/1132703253004.html|access-date=26 July 2006}}</ref> and religious figures made pleas for clemency, but these were rejected by the Singaporean government.<ref>{{Cite news|date=4 December 2005|title=Bishops' plea to save life|work=The Catholic Leader|url=http://www.catholicleader.com.au/index.php?search=2729|url-status=dead|access-date=26 July 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070518233751/http://www.catholicleader.com.au/index.php?search=2729|archive-date=18 May 2007}}</ref>


A plea for clemency by the Australian Government was rejected in October 2005.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200510/s1487963.htm |title=Melbourne man to be hanged |work=ABC News |location=Australia |date=22 October 2005 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051030030123/http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200510/s1487963.htm |archive-date=30 October 2005 }}</ref> Members of the federal and state parliaments appealed for the decision to be reconsidered and clemency to be granted.<ref name="SH-BetterMan">{{cite news |url=http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/burke-recalls-failed-plea-as-worst-day-of-his-career-20130706-2pipj.html |title=Burke recalls failed plea as 'worst day' of his career |work=] |date=7 July 2013 |access-date=7 July 2013 |author=Hardie, Giles }}</ref> His hanging was the first execution of an Australian citizen in Southeast Asia since 1993, when ] was hanged in ] for drug trafficking. Nine years earlier, ] had been sent to the Malaysian state gallows for their part in a drug smuggling case.
"We cannot allow Singapore to be used as a transit for illicit drugs in the region," Tarmugi wrote to Australian MPs. "We know this is a painful and difficult decision for Mr Nguyen's family to accept, but we hope you and your colleagues will understand our position." {{ref|TarmugiLetter}} As a transportation hub, Singapore has always been vulnerable to be used as a transit point for ] heroin.


In November 2005, during the ] in South Korea, Australian Prime Minister ] made a last appeal on Van's behalf to the Singaporean Prime Minister, ]. However, Van's mother was already informed of Van's execution date before this appeal. Howard later said he was "very disappointed" that Lee did not inform him of Van's execution date during their meeting that morning.<ref>{{Cite news|date=17 November 2005|title=Singapore sets Nguyen execution date|publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1509080.htm|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051125100738/http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1509080.htm|archive-date=25 November 2005}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Asha Popatlal|date=18 November 2005|title=Convicted Aussie drug trafficker Nguyen to hang on 2 December|url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/179180/1/.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20051124033940/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/179180/1/.html|archive-date=24 November 2005|access-date=24 July 2011|publisher=]}}</ref> Singapore Foreign Affairs Minister ] also conveyed his apologies to his counterpart ].<ref>{{Cite press release|title=Foreign Minister George Yeo's Letters to Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and Shadow Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd on the Nguyen Tuong Van Case|publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs|date=4 November 2005|url=http://app.mfa.gov.sg/internet/press/view_press.asp?post_id=1495|access-date=26 July 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070325104021/http://app.mfa.gov.sg/internet/press/view_press.asp?post_id=1495|archive-date=25 March 2007|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> Van's lawyers arrived in Singapore on 18 November 2005 to inform their client of his impending execution date.
On ] ] Australia's Human Rights Commissioner, Sev Ozdowski said Australia must keep pressuring Singapore to abandon the death penalty, even if it proves too late for Nguyen.


On 21 November 2005, the Australian Government was considering a request made by Van's lawyers to apply for a hearing at the ] which required the Singaporean government's agreement to its jurisdiction. However, Foreign Minister Downer considered it unlikely that the Singaporean government would agree.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1511278.htm |title=Little hope of court intervention in Nguyen case: Downer |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation |date=21 November 2005 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051125104700/http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1511278.htm |archive-date=25 November 2005 }}</ref> On 24 November 2005, Victorian Attorney General Rob Hulls met with Singapore's Senior Minister of State for Law and Home Affairs ] to press the case for clemency but was unsuccessful.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/singapore-will-hang-nguyen-warns-pm/2005/11/24/1132703280730.html |title=Hulls comes away empty-handed |date=24 November 2005 |work=The Age |location=Melbourne}}</ref> On 28 November 2005 ], ], said Australia must keep pressuring Singapore to abandon the death penalty, even if it proves too late for Van.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1518488.htm |title=Nguyen's mum requests last hug before execution |work=ABC News |date=28 November 2005 |access-date=26 July 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051204230358/http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1518488.htm |archive-date=4 December 2005 }}</ref>
On Thursday ], ], a day before Nguyen is to be hung, Melbourne lawyer ], SC, launched a last ditch legal tactic. He charged Nguyen with drug related offences in the ], which he hopes will allow the Australian Federal Government to extradite Nguyen. However, Justice Minister ] ruled out extradition, saying that the ] Department of Public Prosecutions would not attempt to prosecute Nguyen in Australia.


One day before Van was hanged, a lawyer launched a last-ditch legal tactic, charging Van with drug related offences in the ], which he hoped would allow the Australian Federal Government to extradite Van. However, Justice Minister ] ruled out extradition, saying that the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions would not have attempted to prosecute Van in Australia due to ] laws.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theage.com.au/world/nguyen-loophole-theory-dismissed-20051124-ge1atl.html|title = Nguyen loophole theory dismissed|date = 23 November 2005}}</ref>
A ] requires that Nguyen be in a Melbourne Magistrates Court on ], ]. Mr Walters claims that he did not wish to harm Nguyen's case by starting this tactic earlier. He says:
"There is enough time, whether people are going to move quickly is another matter, but there is enough time."


===Media coverage and public opinion===
A survey by Morgan Poll released on ] ] showed 47 percent of Australians believe Nguyen should be executed, 46 percent said the death penalty should not be carried out, and 7 percent were undecided. {{ref|MorganPoll}}
] broadcast a documentary: '']'' on 7 December 2006.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.justpunishment.com.au/ |title=Just Punishment Website |access-date=12 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130731000510/http://www.justpunishment.com.au/ |archive-date=31 July 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref> This documentary was filmed over two years, following Van's mother (Kim), his brother and his two close friends, through the appeals, and campaigns held (in Australia) before the execution day.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.abc.net.au/tv/guide/netw/200612/programs/ZY8535A001D7122006T212000.htm|title=ABC TV Guide|website=] |access-date=1 July 2007}}</ref> It was rebroadcast on the night of 8 December 2008, also on the ].


An ] conducted by ] two days after Nguyen's execution showed 52% of Australians approved of it, compared with 44% against.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2005/3944/ |title=Majority of Australians Now Believe Van Nguyen Should Have Been Hanged |access-date=29 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120324114729/http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2005/3944/ |archive-date=24 March 2012 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
==Vigils==
Under the rules of Changi Prison, death row prisoners are not allowed physical contact with their visitors. Nguyen's mother Kim has only been allowed to speak to her son through a pane of glass in the death row interview room. Following a personal appeal by John Howard, Nguyen's mother and brother were allowed to hold his hands before his hanging.


In 2013, ] produced a television drama series about the events surrounding Van's arrest, trial, unsuccessful plea for clemency and execution. '']'' starred ], ], ] and ]; and directed by ].<ref name="SH-BetterMan"/>
Campaigners will hold a ] outside the prison before his execution scheduled for 6 am SGT on 2 December 2005.


===Vigils===
The , in the Melbourne suburb Richmond; the church's primary school was in the past attended by Nguyen and twin brother. They will toll their bell 25 times at 9 am. AEDT 2 December 2005, the same time at which Nguyen is to be killed. The 25 rings will symbolise the 25 years of Nguyen's life.
A group of human rights activists held a vigil for Van in Singapore on 7 November 2005. Among those present was opposition politician ], leader of the ], who is an opponent of the mandatory death penalty.{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}}


A request was made by ] ] ] for an official ] to honour Van.<ref>{{Cite news| url = http://www.abc.net.au/northqld/stories/s1519967.htm | title = Veterans' Affairs Minister hits out at calls for minute's silence for convicted trafficker|publisher=ABC North Queensland | date = 30 November 2005|access-date=26 July 2006 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071102172209/http://www.abc.net.au/northqld/stories/s1519967.htm <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 2 November 2007}}</ref> Representatives of the ] objected, stating such tributes should be reserved for fallen soldiers or victims of ]; other groups felt it was inappropriate to "honour" a convicted trafficker of drugs which killed hundreds each year. A motion to hold a minute's silence passed in the ] 49-18 after an hour's debate.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/view/legislativeAssembly/hansard/documents/2005.pdf/2005_12_02_WEEKLY.pdf |title=Weekly Hansard |access-date=7 November 2006 |author=Queensland Legislative Assembly |date=2 December 2005 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080910185403/http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/view/legislativeAssembly/hansard/documents/2005.pdf/2005_12_02_WEEKLY.pdf |archive-date=10 September 2008 }}</ref> MPs who voted against the move walked out before the observance.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,17468606%255E1702,00.html |title=Police outrage over Nguyen tribute |publisher=News Limited |date=5 December 2005 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051211210718/http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0%2C5936%2C17468606%255E1702%2C00.html |archive-date=11 December 2005 |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
The family has been allowed access inside the prison whilst the hanging is taking place. They will not witness the event but have been granted access to be as close to Nguyen as possible at the time of his execution.

=== Execution ===
Singapore's contract hangman, Darshan Singh, gave an interview to an Australian newspaper prior to the execution in which he said he hoped to be called on to perform the execution and that his experience would ensure Van would be hanged "efficiently".<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1518962.htm |title=Executioner hopes to be called in for Nguyen hanging |publisher=Reuters |date=29 November 2005 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080420132838/http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1518962.htm |archive-date=20 April 2008 }}</ref> The result was disapprobation in both Australia and Singapore.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4477012.stm|title= Singapore executioner 'sacked'|publisher=BBC News Online|date=28 November 2005}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/hangman-ignites-outrage/2005/11/29/1133026468284.html|title=Hangman ignites outrage|publisher=Reuters|date=30 November 2005 | location=Melbourne|first1=Connie|last1=Levett|first2=Steve|last2=Butcher}}</ref> Van was ultimately hanged by another executioner.<ref>, The Age, 3 December 2005</ref>

Van was executed at 06:06 SGT on 2 December 2005. He was officially reported as dead at 07:17 SGT by the Ministry of Home Affairs. In a short statement, the Ministry said, "The sentence was carried out this morning at Changi Prison."

Van's body was released to his family and left Changi Prison about four hours after the execution. The body was taken to the Marymount Chapel of the Good Shepherd's Convent in Singapore for a private memorial service at 13:00. The family requested for the media to stay away from the chapel. His family returned to Melbourne with his body on 4 December 2005.<ref>{{Cite news| url = http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/mother-brings-home-her-lost-son/2005/12/04/1133631133288.html | title = Mother brings home her lost son|publisher=Australian Associated Press | date = 4 December 2005 | location=Melbourne}}</ref> A ] was held at ] on 7 December 2005.<ref>{{Cite news | url = http://abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200512/s1525581.htm | title = Nguyen mourners warned against vengeance | publisher = Australian Broadcasting Corporation | date = 7 December 2005 | access-date = 9 December 2005 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20051211114753/http://abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200512/s1525581.htm | archive-date = 11 December 2005 | url-status = dead | df = dmy-all }}</ref> Victorian MPs ], ], ] and ] attended the service.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Butcher |first1=Steve |title=Final applause for man 'dear to many' |url=https://www.theage.com.au/national/final-applause-for-man-dear-to-many-20051208-ge1e1d.html |access-date=1 June 2024 |work=] |publisher=Nine Entertainment |date=8 December 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240601022823/https://www.theage.com.au/national/final-applause-for-man-dear-to-many-20051208-ge1e1d.html |archive-date=1 June 2024 |language=en-AU |url-status=live}}</ref>

==Response==

===Singaporean Government===
As a transportation hub, Singapore has always been a potential transit point for ] heroin.<ref>{{cite web|date=20 July 2006|title=Field Listing – Illicit drugs|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2086.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101229044611/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2086.html|archive-date=29 December 2010|access-date=26 July 2006|publisher=]|df=dmy-all}}</ref> In a letter to ], the Speaker of the Australian House of Representatives from ], the Speaker of the Parliament of Singapore, wrote: "He was caught in possession of almost 400 grams of pure heroin, enough for more than 26,000 doses of heroin for drug addicts.... He knew what he was doing and the consequences of his actions. As representatives of the people, we have an obligation to protect the lives of those who could be ruined by the drugs he was carrying."

"We cannot allow Singapore to be used as a transit for illicit drugs in the region," Tarmugi wrote to Australian MPs. "We know this is a painful and difficult decision for Mr Nguyen's family to accept, but we hope you and your colleagues will understand our position."<ref>{{Cite news|date=24 November 2005|title=Australia 'can do more' for Nguyen|publisher=Australian Associated Press|url=http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,17344637-2,00.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051125020144/http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,17344637-2,00.html|archive-date=25 November 2005}}</ref>

In an opinion piece in the '']'', Singapore's ] in Australia, Joseph Koh, argued that "Singapore cannot afford to pull back from its tough drug trafficking position".<ref>{{Cite news|date=30 November 2005|title=Separating fact from fiction, despite a deep sense of human compassion|work=Sydney Morning Herald|url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/separating-fact-from-fiction-despite-a-deep-sense-of-humancompassion/2005/11/29/1133026464700.html}}</ref>

===Australian Government===
Australian Prime Minister John Howard used the execution of Van as a warning to young people to stay away from drugs. He told Melbourne radio station ]:

{{quote|I don't believe in capital punishment; he was a convicted drug trafficker and that is to be wholly condemned&nbsp;... don't have anything to do with drugs. Don't use them, don't touch them, don't carry them, don't traffic in them and don't imagine for a moment—for a moment—that you can risk carrying drugs anywhere in Asia without suffering the most severe consequences.<ref name="Downer">{{Cite news| url = http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2005/12/02/1133422078900.html | title = Downer lashes out at lawyer|publisher=AAP | date = 3 December 2005|access-date=26 July 2006 | location=Melbourne}}</ref>}}

Howard felt that the decision by the Singapore Government had damaged relations between the two countries but refused any economic sanctions or any punitive action against Singapore.<ref>{{Cite news|date=4 December 2005|title=Singaporean Execution Condemned|publisher=Worldpress.org|url=http://worldpress.org/Asia/2188.cfm|access-date=26 July 2006}}</ref>

Federal Health Minister ] also said that the Singapore government's decision to go ahead with the execution was wrong and that the punishment "certainly did not fit the crime.... But people do need to understand that drug trafficking is a very serious offence and it has heavy penalties in Australia and it has even more drastic penalties overseas as we have been reminded today."<ref name="Downer" />

On 23 February 2006, the Australian government rejected a bid by Singapore Airlines for permission to fly a permanent route between Sydney and the United States. This drew strong criticism from the government of Singapore. ], the ], denied that the refusal was linked to Van's hanging.<ref>{{Cite news| url = http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/singapore-angry-at-air-route-denial/2006/02/22/1140563859784.html | title = Singapore angry at air route denial|work=The Age | date = 22 February 2006 | location=Melbourne, Australia| first1=Jason | last1=Koutsoukis}}</ref>

The Australian Government was criticised by some for not taking a stronger approach to opposing Van's execution.<ref>{{Cite news|date=1 December 2005|title=How Australia failed Nguyen Tuong Van|work=The Sydney Morning Herald|url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/editorial/how-australia-failed-nguyen-tuong-van/2005/11/30/1133311102197.html|access-date=28 June 2009}}</ref><ref>{{Cite press release|title=DPP rejects last ditch legal attempt to save Nguyen|publisher=New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties|date=30 November 2005|url=http://www.nswccl.org.au/news/show_pr.php?relNum=12&relYear=2005|access-date=30 June 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091020004841/http://www.nswccl.org.au/news/show_pr.php?relNum=12&relYear=2005|archive-date=20 October 2009|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref> ] was criticised by Howard Glenn and ] for refusing to work with other human rights groups with various campaigns to prevent Van's execution, but rather asking the public to donate money to Amnesty International.<ref>{{cite web|date=16 December 2005|title=Amnesty failed Nguyen Tuong Van|url=http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=3966&page=0|access-date=28 June 2009}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
{{Portal|Australia|Singapore|Biography|Law}}
*]
{{Wikinews|Australian Van Nguyen executed in Singapore}}
*]
*]
*] *]
*] *]
*]
*]
*] *]
*]

==External links==
*
*
*
*
*
*


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist|30em}}
*{{citenews| url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200311/s998039.htm| title=Australian faces death penalty in Singapore| date=], ]| org=Australian Broadcasting Corporation}}

*{{citenews| url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200510/s1487963.htm| title=Melbourne man to be hanged| org=Australian Broadcasting Corporation| date=], ]}}
{{Authority control}}
*{{citenews| url=http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2005-10-21T100403Z_01_MOR136215_RTRUKOC_0_US-CRIME-AUSTRALIA-SINGAPORE.xml&archived=False| title=Australian to be executed in Singapore| date=], ]| org=Reuters}}
*{{citenews| url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1509080.htm| title=Singapore sets Nguyen execution date| date=], ]| org=Australian Broadcasting Corporation}}
*{{citenews| url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/179180/1/.html| title=Convicted Aussie drug trafficker Nguyen to hang on 2 Dec| date=], ]| org=Channel NewsAsia}}
*{{citenews| url=http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=3888| title=Nguyen Tuong Van - Australia cannot stand idly by| date=], ]| org=On Line Opinion}}
* {{note|DownerComment}} {{citenews| url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1511278.htm| title=Little hope of court intervention in Nguyen case: Downer| org=Australian Broadcasting Corporation| date=], ]}}
* {{note|TarmugiLetter}} {{citenews| url=http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,17344637-2,00.html| title=Letter seals Nguyen's fate| org=Daily Telegraph| date=], ]}}
*{{citenews| url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/separating-fact-from-fiction-despite-a-deep-sense-of-humancompassion/2005/11/29/1133026464700.html| title=Separating fact from fiction, despite a deep sense of human compassion| date=], ]| org=Sydney Morning Herald}}
* {{note|MorganPoll}} {{citenews| url = http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,17424360%255E1702,00.html | title = Poll shows 'hate for drug pushers |org = Herald Sun | date = ], ] }}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Nguyen, Van Tuong}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 10:15, 23 November 2024

Australian salesman convicted of drug trafficking in Singapore For the 19th century Vietnamese politician, see Nguyen Van Tuong. "Van Nguyen" redirects here. For the chess grandmaster, see Thai Dai Van Nguyen. For the poker player, see Van Nguyen (poker player). In this Vietnamese name, the surname is Nguyễn. In accordance with Vietnamese custom, this person should be referred to by the given name, Vân.

Nguyen Tuong-van
Van Tuong Nguyen's mugshot
Born(1980-08-17)17 August 1980
Songkhla, Thailand
Died2 December 2005(2005-12-02) (aged 25)
Changi Prison, Changi, Singapore
Cause of deathExecution by hanging
Criminal statusExecuted
Conviction(s)Drug trafficking
Criminal penaltyDeath (x26)

Van Tuong Nguyen (Vietnamese: Nguyễn Tường Vân, listen; 17 August 1980 – 2 December 2005), baptised Caleb, was an Australian from Melbourne, Victoria convicted of drug trafficking in Singapore. A Vietnamese Australian, he was also addressed as Nguyen Tuong-van (阮祥雲) in the Singaporean media, his name in Vietnamese custom, as well as in most Asian customs.

Drug trafficking carries a mandatory death sentence under Singapore's Misuse of Drugs Act, and despite pleas for clemency from the Australian Government, Amnesty International, the Holy See, as well as other individuals and groups, he was executed by hanging at 06:06 SST on 2 December 2005 at Changi Prison (22:06 UTC, 1 December 2005).

Biography

Van Tuong Nguyen and his twin brother, Dang Khoa Nguyen, were born in a refugee camp at Songkhla in Thailand to Vietnamese parents. He did not know his father until 2001 when he travelled from the United States to Australia. His mother, Kim, is Vietnamese and migrated to Australia shortly after the boys' birth. In 1987, she married a Vietnamese-Australian who beat them often, according to Nguyen.

Van was educated at St Ignatius School in Richmond, St Joseph's Primary School in Springvale and Mount Waverley Secondary College. After leaving school at 18, he intended to study at Deakin University, but financial difficulties led him to work as a store clerk, door-to-door salesman, computer salesman and research marketer.

Van started his own computer sales business in 1999. After his brother Khoa got into legal trouble, Van wound up the business. He then found a sales, research and marketing job and earned between A$1,500 to A$2,500 a month (depending on how much commission he received). He subsequently took long leave between June and December 2002. In his confession, he stated he was on "medication for acne that required 4 months leave".

Drug trafficking

Throughout his trial, Van claimed that he was carrying the drugs in a bid to pay off debts amounting to approximately A$20,000 to A$25,000 that he owed and to repay legal fees his twin brother Khoa (a former heroin addict) had incurred in defending drug-trafficking and other criminal charges including an attack on a Pacific Islander youth with a katana. In addition to his own financial troubles, Van said he tried to help pay his twin brother's debt of A$12,000. His twin brother's loan had to be repaid by the end of 2002. Van could afford to repay only A$4,000, the interest on the loan.

By October 2002, Van had been out of a job for four months and sustaining expenses which included interest on the loan and personal living costs, all totaling A$580 a month. In November 2002, Nguyen was contacted by a Chinese man named "Tan", who told him to travel to Sydney to meet a Vietnamese man named "Sun". Sun proposed that he would repay Nguyen's loans if Nguyen transported packages from Cambodia back to Melbourne and possibly Sydney, via Singapore. The man said the packages contained "white", which Nguyen understood to be heroin.

It was Van's first trip overseas from Australia since his immigration. He reached Phnom Penh at midday on 3 December 2002 after leaving Sydney in the evening of the previous day. He met with a Cambodian man at the Lucky Burger restaurant on 4 December and was taken by car to a garage where he was forced to smoke some powdered heroin. The following day, Van met his associates at the Lucky Burger and was again taken to the garage and ordered by the men to consume heroin, perhaps to help them determine if he was an undercover police officer. Van was instructed to stay in Phnom Penh until 10 December, at which point he was to meet at the Lucky Burger.

On 8 December, he decided to fly to Ho Chi Minh City. On 10 December he returned to Phnom Penh, but missed his scheduled meeting at the Lucky Burger. On 11 December he was taken to the garage, where he was then instructed on how to crush heroin bricks and to strap the powdered drug packages to his body. The rest of the day was spent crushing and packaging the drugs in his hotel room. He checked out of the hotel the next day and went to the airport.

Arrest and conviction

On boarding his flight to Melbourne after a four-hour stopover at Singapore Changi Airport, Van triggered a metal detector. A package of heroin from Cambodia was found strapped to his body. After the first package was discovered, Van informed the airport official about a second package in his luggage.

Van confessed to have in his possession 396.2g of heroin, more than 26 times the amount of heroin that mandates a death sentence under the Misuse of Drugs Act (import or export of heroin of more than 15 grams). The Singaporean High Court sentenced Van to death for this crime on 20 March 2004. After he was convicted, Van was held on death row in Changi Prison.

An appeal to the Court of Appeal was rejected on 20 October 2004.

Van's family received a registered letter from the Singapore Prison Service, notifying of his scheduled hanging on 2 December 2005.

Pleas for clemency

After his sentencing in March 2004, anti-death-penalty campaigners were reported to be inundated with emails from Australians offering support for Van. Politicians and religious figures made pleas for clemency, but these were rejected by the Singaporean government.

A plea for clemency by the Australian Government was rejected in October 2005. Members of the federal and state parliaments appealed for the decision to be reconsidered and clemency to be granted. His hanging was the first execution of an Australian citizen in Southeast Asia since 1993, when Michael McAuliffe was hanged in Malaysia for drug trafficking. Nine years earlier, Kevin Barlow and Brian Chambers had been sent to the Malaysian state gallows for their part in a drug smuggling case.

In November 2005, during the 2005 APEC Summit in South Korea, Australian Prime Minister John Howard made a last appeal on Van's behalf to the Singaporean Prime Minister, Lee Hsien Loong. However, Van's mother was already informed of Van's execution date before this appeal. Howard later said he was "very disappointed" that Lee did not inform him of Van's execution date during their meeting that morning. Singapore Foreign Affairs Minister George Yeo also conveyed his apologies to his counterpart Alexander Downer. Van's lawyers arrived in Singapore on 18 November 2005 to inform their client of his impending execution date.

On 21 November 2005, the Australian Government was considering a request made by Van's lawyers to apply for a hearing at the International Court of Justice which required the Singaporean government's agreement to its jurisdiction. However, Foreign Minister Downer considered it unlikely that the Singaporean government would agree. On 24 November 2005, Victorian Attorney General Rob Hulls met with Singapore's Senior Minister of State for Law and Home Affairs Ho Peng Kee to press the case for clemency but was unsuccessful. On 28 November 2005 Australia's Human Rights Commissioner, Sev Ozdowski, said Australia must keep pressuring Singapore to abandon the death penalty, even if it proves too late for Van.

One day before Van was hanged, a lawyer launched a last-ditch legal tactic, charging Van with drug related offences in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court, which he hoped would allow the Australian Federal Government to extradite Van. However, Justice Minister Chris Ellison ruled out extradition, saying that the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions would not have attempted to prosecute Van in Australia due to double jeopardy laws.

Media coverage and public opinion

ABC broadcast a documentary: Just Punishment on 7 December 2006. This documentary was filmed over two years, following Van's mother (Kim), his brother and his two close friends, through the appeals, and campaigns held (in Australia) before the execution day. It was rebroadcast on the night of 8 December 2008, also on the ABC.

An opinion poll conducted by Roy Morgan Research two days after Nguyen's execution showed 52% of Australians approved of it, compared with 44% against.

In 2013, SBS TV produced a television drama series about the events surrounding Van's arrest, trial, unsuccessful plea for clemency and execution. Better Man starred David Wenham, Claudia Karvan, Bryan Brown and Remy Hii; and directed by Khoa Do.

Vigils

A group of human rights activists held a vigil for Van in Singapore on 7 November 2005. Among those present was opposition politician Chee Soon Juan, leader of the Singapore Democratic Party, who is an opponent of the mandatory death penalty.

A request was made by Liberal MP Bruce Baird for an official minute's silence to honour Van. Representatives of the Returned and Services League objected, stating such tributes should be reserved for fallen soldiers or victims of natural disasters; other groups felt it was inappropriate to "honour" a convicted trafficker of drugs which killed hundreds each year. A motion to hold a minute's silence passed in the Legislative Assembly of Queensland 49-18 after an hour's debate. MPs who voted against the move walked out before the observance.

Execution

Singapore's contract hangman, Darshan Singh, gave an interview to an Australian newspaper prior to the execution in which he said he hoped to be called on to perform the execution and that his experience would ensure Van would be hanged "efficiently". The result was disapprobation in both Australia and Singapore. Van was ultimately hanged by another executioner.

Van was executed at 06:06 SGT on 2 December 2005. He was officially reported as dead at 07:17 SGT by the Ministry of Home Affairs. In a short statement, the Ministry said, "The sentence was carried out this morning at Changi Prison."

Van's body was released to his family and left Changi Prison about four hours after the execution. The body was taken to the Marymount Chapel of the Good Shepherd's Convent in Singapore for a private memorial service at 13:00. The family requested for the media to stay away from the chapel. His family returned to Melbourne with his body on 4 December 2005. A requiem mass was held at St. Patrick's Cathedral on 7 December 2005. Victorian MPs Geoff Hilton, Bruce Mildenhall, Sang Nguyen and Richard Wynne attended the service.

Response

Singaporean Government

As a transportation hub, Singapore has always been a potential transit point for Golden Triangle heroin. In a letter to David Hawker, the Speaker of the Australian House of Representatives from Abdullah Tarmugi, the Speaker of the Parliament of Singapore, wrote: "He was caught in possession of almost 400 grams of pure heroin, enough for more than 26,000 doses of heroin for drug addicts.... He knew what he was doing and the consequences of his actions. As representatives of the people, we have an obligation to protect the lives of those who could be ruined by the drugs he was carrying."

"We cannot allow Singapore to be used as a transit for illicit drugs in the region," Tarmugi wrote to Australian MPs. "We know this is a painful and difficult decision for Mr Nguyen's family to accept, but we hope you and your colleagues will understand our position."

In an opinion piece in the Sydney Morning Herald, Singapore's High Commissioner in Australia, Joseph Koh, argued that "Singapore cannot afford to pull back from its tough drug trafficking position".

Australian Government

Australian Prime Minister John Howard used the execution of Van as a warning to young people to stay away from drugs. He told Melbourne radio station 3AW:

I don't believe in capital punishment; he was a convicted drug trafficker and that is to be wholly condemned ... don't have anything to do with drugs. Don't use them, don't touch them, don't carry them, don't traffic in them and don't imagine for a moment—for a moment—that you can risk carrying drugs anywhere in Asia without suffering the most severe consequences.

Howard felt that the decision by the Singapore Government had damaged relations between the two countries but refused any economic sanctions or any punitive action against Singapore.

Federal Health Minister Tony Abbott also said that the Singapore government's decision to go ahead with the execution was wrong and that the punishment "certainly did not fit the crime.... But people do need to understand that drug trafficking is a very serious offence and it has heavy penalties in Australia and it has even more drastic penalties overseas as we have been reminded today."

On 23 February 2006, the Australian government rejected a bid by Singapore Airlines for permission to fly a permanent route between Sydney and the United States. This drew strong criticism from the government of Singapore. Peter Costello, the Australian Treasurer, denied that the refusal was linked to Van's hanging.

The Australian Government was criticised by some for not taking a stronger approach to opposing Van's execution. Amnesty International was criticised by Howard Glenn and Greg Barns for refusing to work with other human rights groups with various campaigns to prevent Van's execution, but rather asking the public to donate money to Amnesty International.

See also

References

  1. "Loving son's letters from death row". The Age. Melbourne, Australia. 27 November 2005. Retrieved 26 July 2006.
  2. ^ "Meaning of life found on death row". Sydney Morning Herald. 2 December 2005.
  3. "Public Prosecutor vs Nguyen Tuong Van". Archived from the original on 13 November 2006. Retrieved 1 July 2007.
  4. "Nguyen's twin found guilty in samurai sword attack". The Star. Retrieved 30 November 2022.
  5. "Public Prosecutor v Nguyen Tuong Van [2004] SGHC 54" (PDF).
  6. "Hundreds offer help for condemned Australian". Sydney Morning Herald. AAP. 23 March 2004. Retrieved 26 July 2006.
  7. Butcher, Steve; Marino, Melissa (24 March 2004). "Fight to save condemned man gathers support". The Age. Melbourne. AAP. Retrieved 26 July 2006.
  8. Grattan, Michelle; Munro, Ian (24 November 2005). "Airline row link to Nguyen". The Age. Melbourne. Retrieved 26 July 2006.
  9. "Bishops' plea to save life". The Catholic Leader. 4 December 2005. Archived from the original on 18 May 2007. Retrieved 26 July 2006.
  10. "Melbourne man to be hanged". ABC News. Australia. 22 October 2005. Archived from the original on 30 October 2005.
  11. ^ Hardie, Giles (7 July 2013). "Burke recalls failed plea as 'worst day' of his career". Sun-Herald. Retrieved 7 July 2013.
  12. "Singapore sets Nguyen execution date". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 17 November 2005. Archived from the original on 25 November 2005.
  13. Asha Popatlal (18 November 2005). "Convicted Aussie drug trafficker Nguyen to hang on 2 December". Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on 24 November 2005. Retrieved 24 July 2011.
  14. "Foreign Minister George Yeo's Letters to Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and Shadow Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd on the Nguyen Tuong Van Case" (Press release). Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 4 November 2005. Archived from the original on 25 March 2007. Retrieved 26 July 2006.
  15. "Little hope of court intervention in Nguyen case: Downer". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 21 November 2005. Archived from the original on 25 November 2005.
  16. "Hulls comes away empty-handed". The Age. Melbourne. 24 November 2005.
  17. "Nguyen's mum requests last hug before execution". ABC News. 28 November 2005. Archived from the original on 4 December 2005. Retrieved 26 July 2006.
  18. "Nguyen loophole theory dismissed". 23 November 2005.
  19. "Just Punishment Website". Archived from the original on 31 July 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2020.
  20. "ABC TV Guide". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 1 July 2007.
  21. "Majority of Australians Now Believe Van Nguyen Should Have Been Hanged". Archived from the original on 24 March 2012. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
  22. "Veterans' Affairs Minister hits out at calls for minute's silence for convicted trafficker". ABC North Queensland. 30 November 2005. Archived from the original on 2 November 2007. Retrieved 26 July 2006.
  23. Queensland Legislative Assembly (2 December 2005). "Weekly Hansard" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 September 2008. Retrieved 7 November 2006.
  24. "Police outrage over Nguyen tribute". News Limited. 5 December 2005. Archived from the original on 11 December 2005.
  25. "Executioner hopes to be called in for Nguyen hanging". Reuters. 29 November 2005. Archived from the original on 20 April 2008.
  26. "Singapore executioner 'sacked'". BBC News Online. 28 November 2005.
  27. Levett, Connie; Butcher, Steve (30 November 2005). "Hangman ignites outrage". Melbourne: Reuters.
  28. Darshan didn't do it, The Age, 3 December 2005
  29. "Mother brings home her lost son". Melbourne: Australian Associated Press. 4 December 2005.
  30. "Nguyen mourners warned against vengeance". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 7 December 2005. Archived from the original on 11 December 2005. Retrieved 9 December 2005.
  31. Butcher, Steve (8 December 2005). "Final applause for man 'dear to many'". The Age. Nine Entertainment. Archived from the original on 1 June 2024. Retrieved 1 June 2024.
  32. "Field Listing – Illicit drugs". CIA. 20 July 2006. Archived from the original on 29 December 2010. Retrieved 26 July 2006.
  33. "Australia 'can do more' for Nguyen". Australian Associated Press. 24 November 2005. Archived from the original on 25 November 2005.
  34. "Separating fact from fiction, despite a deep sense of human compassion". Sydney Morning Herald. 30 November 2005.
  35. ^ "Downer lashes out at lawyer". Melbourne: AAP. 3 December 2005. Retrieved 26 July 2006.
  36. "Singaporean Execution Condemned". Worldpress.org. 4 December 2005. Retrieved 26 July 2006.
  37. Koutsoukis, Jason (22 February 2006). "Singapore angry at air route denial". The Age. Melbourne, Australia.
  38. "How Australia failed Nguyen Tuong Van". The Sydney Morning Herald. 1 December 2005. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
  39. "DPP rejects last ditch legal attempt to save Nguyen" (Press release). New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties. 30 November 2005. Archived from the original on 20 October 2009. Retrieved 30 June 2009.
  40. "Amnesty failed Nguyen Tuong Van". 16 December 2005. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
Categories: