Revision as of 19:17, 2 September 2005 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 editsm wikify← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:15, 29 November 2024 edit undo24.177.51.21 (talk) he was captured recently if anyone else wants to mention it | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Organization}} | |||
] in the ] ]] | |||
{{Redirect|SHAC}} | |||
'''Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty''' (SHAC) is an international ] campaign against ] (HLS), ]'s largest contract animal-testing laboratory, which is based in ] and Occold, ], and ] in the ]. HLS tests products like household cleaners, drugs, pesticides, food colorings, and sweeteners on around 70,000 animals every year, including rats, hamsters, guinea pigs, birds, rabbits, cats, dogs, pigs, and primates. The company has also been involved in ] experiments on wild baboons from ], according to internal documents leaked to ''Uncaged Campaigns'' and '']''. | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2021}} | |||
{{Infobox organization | |||
| name = Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty | |||
| logo = ] | |||
| type = | |||
| Non-profit_slogan = | |||
| location = UK and US | |||
| origins = England | |||
| product = | |||
| focus = ] campaign to close ]. Opposition to ]. | |||
| num_volunteers = | |||
| num_members = | |||
}} | |||
'''Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty''' ('''SHAC''') was an international ] campaign to close down ] (HLS), Europe's largest contract ] laboratory. HLS tests medical and non-medical substances on around 75,000 animals every year, from rats to primates.<ref name="BBCJan182001"/><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070712081822/http://www.drugresearcher.com/news/ng.asp?n=72122-faseb-us-government-huntingdon |date=12 July 2007 }}, ''Drug Researcher'', 17 November 2006.</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2003-10-19 |title=SPLCenter.org: From Push to Shove |url=http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=42 |access-date=2021-12-30 |website= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031019135845/http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=42 |archive-date=19 October 2003 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>Townsend, Mark. , ''The Observer'', 20 April 2003.</ref> It has been the subject of several major leaks or undercover investigations by activists and reporters since 1989.<ref name=investigations/> | |||
SHAC was started by British animal rights activists ] and Heather James in November 1999, after video footage shot covertly inside HLS by ] (PETA) was aired on British television. SHAC was launched to fill the vacuum created when PETA retreated from its campaign against HLS following the threat of legal action. | |||
SHAC was started by three British animal rights activists—], ], and Natasha Dellemagne—after video footage supposed to have been shot covertly inside HLS in 1997 by ] (PETA) showed HLS staff shaking, punching, and shouting at beagles in their care.<ref>Alleyne, Richard. , ''The Daily Telegraph'', 19 January 2001. | |||
The undercover footage showed HLS staff shouting, shaking, laughing at, and punching the animals, as well as falsifying experiments. (mpg) The individuals were dismissed and ], and Huntingdon Life Science's ] licence to perform animal experiments was temporarily revoked. Since then, other investigations and leaked documents have revealed further abuse and incompetence, such as staff turning up for work drunk, or taking drugs. Footage shot in the U.S. appears to show staff dissecting a live monkey. (Quicktime) | |||
*Also see , ''Countryside Undercover'', Channel Four Television, 1997.</ref> The footage was broadcast by ] in the UK, the employees were dismissed and prosecuted, and HLS's licence to perform animal experiments was revoked for six months. PETA stopped its protests against the company after HLS threatened it with legal action, and SHAC took over as a ].<ref name=DowardAug2004>Doward, Jamie and Townsend, Mark. , ''The Observer'', 1 August 2004.</ref> | |||
The campaign used tactics ranging from non-violent protest to the alleged firebombing of houses owned by executives associated with HLS's clients and investors. The ] (SPLC), which monitors US domestic extremism, has described SHAC's ''modus operandi'' as "frankly terroristic tactics similar to those of anti-abortion extremists," and in 2005 an official with the FBI's counter-terrorism division referred to SHAC's activities in the United States as domestic terrorist threats.<ref name=":0" /><ref>Lewis, John E. , US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, 26 October 2005, accessed 17 January 2011.</ref> | |||
] | |||
In 2009 and 2010, 13 members of SHAC, including Avery, James, and Dellemagne, were jailed for between 15 months and eleven years on charges of conspiracy to blackmail or harm HLS and its suppliers.<ref name="Evers"/><ref name=Weaver>{{cite web|last=Weaver|first=Matthew|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/oct/25/animal-research-animal-welfare|title=Animal rights activists jailed for terrorising suppliers to Huntingdon Life Sciences|work=The Guardian|date=25 October 2010|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130917122937/https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/oct/25/animal-research-animal-welfare|archive-date=17 September 2013}}</ref> | |||
== The SHAC campaign== | |||
===Organization=== | |||
{{TOCright}} | |||
SHAC activities are based on ], protests and ] against HLS, its employees, its employees' families, and its business partners. By targeting clients, employees, suppliers, insurers, and even the caterers and cleaners of the laboratory, they aim to scare away HLS's clientele and render the laboratory work as difficult and costly as possible. | |||
==Background== | |||
The SHAC spokespersons are Greg Avery and his wife, Natasha Avery. Together with his first wife, Heather James, they are responsible for publishing SHAC reports via mail and on their website, and providing press information and interviews. They were jailed for six months in December 2001 for criminal incitement. | |||
<!-- Deleted image removed: .</ref>]] --> | |||
HLS tests household cleaners, pesticides, weedkillers, food additives, chemicals for use in industry, and drugs for use against Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and cancer.<ref name=BBCJan182001>, BBC News, 18 January 2001.</ref> It kills around 75,000 animals every year, including rats, rabbits, pigs, dogs, and primates (marmosets and macaques).<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050204063555/http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=42 |date=4 February 2005 }} Southern Poverty Law Group ''Intelligence Report'', Fall 2002. | |||
*Townsend, Mark. , ''The Observer'', 20 April 2003.</ref> | |||
The company has been the subject of several undercover investigations since 1989. Sarah Kite of the ] (BUAV) secured a job and filmed inside HLS in 1989. Zoe Broughton did the same for Channel 4 in 1996, as Michelle Rokke claimed to have done for PETA in 1997. Lucy Johnston for ''The Daily Express'' gained access in 2000. A diary kept by Kite, who worked undercover there for eight months, alleged that HLS workers routinely mishandled the animals, shouting at them, throwing them into their cages, and mocking them for having fits in response to toxicity tests. In 1997, Zoe Broughton came out with footage showing puppies being hit and shaken. A year later, Michelle Rokke allegedly obtained footage of the ] of a monkey in HLS in New Jersey, in which a technician expresses concern that the animal is inadequately anaesthetized.<ref name=investigations> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080827213152/http://www.insidehls.com/inside_kite.htm |date=27 August 2008 }}; {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080827213115/http://www.insidehls.com/inside_broughton.htm |date=27 August 2008 }} (Zoe Broughton for Channel Four in 1996); {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080827212839/http://www.insidehls.com/inside_rokke.htm |date=27 August 2008 }} (Michelle Rokke for PETA in 1997); and Johnstone, Lucy and Calvert, Jonathan. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080827213308/http://www.insidehls.com/inside_xeno.htm |date=27 August 2008 }} (Lucy Johnston for ''The Daily Express'' in 2000). | |||
The SHAC website and mailing list serves as a platform for supporters. Action reports are published on the website and mailed out to subscribers. Possible targets of the campaign and the companies that have severed their links with HLS are also published. | |||
*Also see Mann, Keith. ''From Dusk 'til Dawn: An insider's view of the growth of the Animal Liberation Movement''. Puppy Pincher Press, 2007, pp. 198–199. | |||
*, filmed at the HLS Princeton Research Center, New Jersey, accessed 20 June 2009.</ref> Between 2006 and 2008, an ] employee filmed undercover inside HLS after securing a position inside its primate toxicology unit in Cambridgeshire.<ref>, Animal Defenders International, 15 July 2009, accessed 17 January 2011. | |||
*, indybay.org, accessed 17 January 2011. | |||
*Also see , Animal Defenders International, shown at the European Parliament in February 2009, courtesy of ''YouTube'', accessed 17 January 2011.</ref> | |||
According to Mark Matfield of the ], a pro-animal testing lobby group in the UK, HLS lost a great deal of business after these investigations, primarily among the pharmaceutical industry. "There was an ingrained feeling among scientists and business people that this company had transgressed in a very serious way," he said.<ref name=Rudacille>Rudacille, Deborah. ''The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The Conflict between Animal Research and Animal Protection''. University of California Press, 2001, p. 286.<!-- ISBN needed, if one exists --></ref> | |||
SHAC is not a closed organization, but an assembly of individuals and independent groups with shared goals and principles, who are regarded by SHAC as responsible for their own actions. SHAC says it refrains from any action that might physically harm human or non-human animals. However, destruction of property and the intimidation of any person benefiting from a relationship with HLS is deemed acceptable. According to Greg Avery, "hey've made their beds and now it's time to lie in them, and they're all whining." (pdf) | |||
==Structure== | |||
], managing director of HLS, was attacked by three men with pickaxe handles in February 2001.]] | |||
] by SHAC supporters has included violence, ], intimidation with death-threat letters and hoax bombs, ], ], ], and destruction of property. | |||
===SHAC UK=== | |||
Despite SHAC's stated policy of non-violent direct action, ], the managing director of HLS, was attacked outside his home in February 2001 by three men armed with pickaxe handles and CS gas. A neighbor who tried to intervene was sprayed with CS gas. Dave Blenkinsop, an ALF activist, was jailed for three years for the attack. A few months later, HLS marketing director Andrew Gay was attacked on his doorstep with a chemical spray to his eyes, leaving him temporarily blinded. | |||
<!-- Deleted image removed: ] founded SHAC with Greg Avery and Natasha Dellemagne. They were sentenced in 2009 to 11 and nine years imprisonment.]] --> | |||
SHAC was founded in November 1999 by Greg Avery; his second wife, Natasha Avery (née Dellemagne); and his first wife, Heather Nicholson (née James). Avery and Nicholson had been involved in previous high-profile campaigns against facilities in the UK that bred animals for laboratories. In 1997, after a ten-month campaign, they caused the closure of ], which bred beagles for animal research. Later that year, they started ] against Hill Grove farm in Oxfordshire, which bred cats for laboratories. The farm closed after two years.<ref name=Jonas>{{cite book|contributor-last=Jonas|contributor-first=Kevin|contributor-link=Kevin Kjonaas|contribution=Chapter: Bricks and Bullhorns|last1=Best|first1=Steven|last2=Nocella|first2=Anthony J|title=Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?: Reflections on the Liberation of Animals|publisher=Lantern Books|date=2004|page=271|quote="Today, SHAC is the intelligent and strategic continuation of such a rounded attack, effectively coupling both legal and illegal tactics ... The "SHAC campaign" has come to mean any endeavor aimed at contributing to the legal SHAC efforts, whether it be legal or not. In various legal proceedings we have distinguished SHAC the incorporated group as a news/information clearing house, and the "SHAC campaign" as all other protest activities."|isbn=978-1-59056-054-9|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1juWE6y1C1QC&pg=PA271}}</ref> | |||
They would meet every three months to receive updates from colleagues in the United States and Europe.<ref name=Bugged>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7657837.stm|title=Police bugged animal rights group|publisher=BBC News|date=7 October 2008|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081010145641/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7657837.stm|archive-date=10 October 2008}}</ref> Sarah Whitehead, an experienced campaigner known in the group as "Mumsy", would lead younger members and carry out up to five attacks in a night, according to the judge.<ref name=Weaver/> | |||
As with other forms of animal-rights activism in which individuals do not act as members of a formal organization, the attack cannot be formally attributed to SHAC. Holding SHAC responsible for establishing a "community of sympathy" for such crimes would necessitate wide-ranging constraints on ]. | |||
<br> | |||
=== Ties to Animal Liberation Front === | |||
The SHAC spokespersons disclaim any connection between their campaign and attacks carried out by activists using the name ] (ALF). However, the SHAC website features ALF news, and Kevin Jonas, the president of SHAC USA, who took charge of SHAC UK while Greg Avery was jailed for six months in 2002, has declared his "unequivocal support for the Animal Liberation Front." Robin Webb, spokesman for the ALF in the UK, regularly attends and addresses SHAC conferences in the U.S. | |||
], ] UK press officer, addresses a meeting of SHAC.]] | |||
===Methods=== | |||
"Dangerous activists are moving freely between these groups, money is changing hands and the threat is escalating," David Martosko, spokesman for the Centre for Consumer Freedom (CCF), told '']'' in August 2004. The CCF is a new pressure group formed by fast-food chains and pharmaceutical companies to combat animal-rights activism. The FBI suspects that British SHAC activists are being bankrolled by groups and individuals in the U.S. | |||
====Secondary and tertiary targeting==== | |||
Activists possibly associated with SHAC have committed crimes that were claimed on behalf of the ALF. Dave Blenkinsop was jailed for the attack on HLS managing director Brian Cass and also for bombing poultry vans, the latter claimed on behalf of the ALF. There is no firm indication that Blenkinsop was involved with SHAC, because the open nature of the organization makes it impossible to say with certainty who is involved and which actions may properly be attributed to it. | |||
SHAC's ''modus operandi'' is known as secondary and tertiary targeting. Activists engage in ]—ranging from lawful protests to intimidation, harassment, and violent attacks—not only against HLS, its employees, and its employees' families, but also against secondary and tertiary targets such as HLS's business partners, and ''their'' business partners, insurers, caterers, cleaners, children's nursery schools, and office suppliers.<ref>, BBC News, 29 September 2005. | |||
*Also see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080801014736/http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=247787 |date=1 August 2008 }}, U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, 26 October 2005, accessed 17 January 2011.</ref> The campaign drove down HLS's profits, suppressed its share price, and made it difficult to find business and financial partners.<ref>, ''The Guardian'', 1 June 2006. | |||
*, BBC News, 28 March 2001.</ref> | |||
In 2001, HLS managing director in the UK, ], was beaten outside his home by three masked men – animal rights activist David Blenkinsop was sentenced to three years in prison for the attack – and HLS marketing director Andrew Gay was attacked on his doorstep with a chemical spray to his eyes that left him temporarily blinded.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
Similarly, the ALF is not a closed organization, but is simply a name used by activists when they engage in covert, non-violent, direct action that furthers the cause of ]. Any analysis of how much overlap exists between SHAC and ALF actions is therefore speculative, although the ], ] warning by the ALF to HLS supporters, posted on the ALF website, leaves little doubt that there is a strong relationship between the activists: "If you support or raise funds for any company connected with Huntingdon Life Sciences we will track you down, come for you and destroy your property with fire." | |||
====Shareholders==== | |||
==Effects of campaign on HLS== | |||
], ] in March 2004]] | |||
When the SHAC campaign started in 1999, Greg Avery vowed to close HLS "within three years". While this has not happened, SHAC's efforts have had an impact on HLS's business deals, share price, and profits. The SHAC website maintains a list of companies, 166 of them as of June 2005, that have severed business ties with HLS. The British ] had to insure HLS because all previous insurers had abandoned them after being targeted by SHAC. | |||
On 21 December 2000, HLS was dropped from the New York Stock Exchange because its ] had fallen below NYSE limits, and on 29 March 2001, HLS lost both of its ]s and its place on the London Stock Exchange. Shortly after this, HLS moved its headquarters to the United States, incorporating as Life Sciences Research (LSR), and secured a $15m loan from investment bank ], its largest shareholder. In September 2005, after the firebombing of the homes of a Canadian brokerage employee and a British pharmaceutical executive, the New York Stock Exchange asked LSR to delay moving its listing from the ] to the main exchange.<ref>, ''The Guardian'', 8 September 2005.</ref> LSR has since transferred its listing to the ] electronic exchange. HLS is no longer a publicly traded company after being bought by CEO Andrew Baker.<ref>, ''Outsourcing'', pharma.com, 1 December 2009.</ref> | |||
===Shareholders published=== | |||
In ], SHAC obtained a list of HLS shareholders. The list included the names of ''beneficial owners'': anonymous individuals and companies who bought shares using the name of a third party. Shareholders included the pension funds of the ] (its 75,000 shares were sold in January 2000), ] cars, and the ]. | |||
In June 2005, Vancouver-based brokerage ] announced that it had dropped a client, Phytopharm PLC, in response to the May 2005 ] (ALF) firebombing of a car belonging to Canaccord executive Michael Kendall. The ALF stated on its website that activists placed an incendiary device under the car, which was in Kendall's garage at home when it caught fire during the night. Kendall and his family went into hiding. Phytopharm was targeted, as were those doing business with it, because it had business links with HLS.<ref>Won, Shirley, and Zehr, Leonard. {{dead link|date=June 2018|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}, ''The Globe and Mail'', 24 June 2005.</ref> | |||
The list was leaked to the press (''Sunday Telegraph'', ], ]) and several beneficial owners disposed of their shares. Two weeks later, an equity stake of 32 million shares was placed on the ] for one pence each. HLS quotes crashed immediately. The ] closed HLS's bank account and the British government arranged for the state-owned ] to give them an account. The British Banking Association said "Huntingdon Life Sciences are in a nightmare situation," (Huntingdon Life Sciences, financial report 2002). (pdf) | |||
In May 2006, an anonymous group said it would be writing to every one of GlaxoSmithKline's 170,000 small investors warning them to sell their shares. The letters began arriving at investors' home addresses on 7 May 2006, asking that shares be sold within 14 days, and that the group be informed of the sale by e-mail via a Hotmail address.<ref>, ''The Guardian'', 9 May 2006.</ref> The number of letters sent was smaller than claimed; the BBC said at least 50 shareholders received the warning.<ref>, 9 May 2006.</ref> Writing in ''The Sunday Telegraph'' the following week, British Prime Minister ] expressed support for animal experimentation in the face of an ''"appalling ... campaign of intimidation."''<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1518328/Tony-Blair-Time-to-act-against-animal-rights-protesters.html|title=Tony Blair: Time to act against animal rights protesters|journal=The Daily Telegraph|date=2006-05-13|access-date=2018-01-26|language=en-GB|issn=0307-1235}}</ref> | |||
===Dropped from NY stock exchange=== | |||
On ], ], HLS was dropped from the ] because of its share collapse: its ] had fallen below NYSE limits and the NYSE did not accept HLS's revised business plan. On ], ], HLS lost both of its ]s and its place on the main platform of the ]. | |||
=== |
===Ties to the ALF=== | ||
Kevin Kjonaas – who took charge of SHAC UK while the Averys and James were jailed for six months in 2002 – declared his support for the ALF, and ], spokesman for the ALF in the UK, attended and addressed SHAC conferences in the United States.<ref name=DowardAug2004/> | |||
Because of SHAC's use of public records to send malicious threats to HLS investors, HLS moved its financial centre to the ] and incorporated in ] as Life Sciences Research, Inc., in order to take advantage of stricter U.S. securities laws, which allow greater anonymity of shareholders. HLS currently trades on the ]'s ] as "LSRI". Maryland allows shareholders with less than 5% holdings to remain anonymous. Partly because of this, the British government has changed the law so that smaller investors in a company are not publicly listed. | |||
In 2006 the ALF warned that it was targeting HLS suppliers, and that year firebombed a car belonging to the finance director of Canaccord Capital, a brokerage firm. Members of SHAC said the company had acted as brokers for ], which had used HLS for contract testing.<ref>Laville, Sandra and Campbell, Duncan. , ''The Guardian'', 25 June 2006.</ref> | |||
===Saved from banktruptcy=== | |||
HLS was saved from bankruptcy when its largest shareholder, American investment bank Stephens, Inc, gave the company a $15-million loan. SHAC supporters reacted by targeting Stephens, Inc. HLS's position remains unstable, as is shown by their $87.5-million debt and by documents leaked to SHAC. | |||
The FBI linked SHAC with attacks claimed by the militant animal rights group, the ]. They issued an arrest warrant for ], who they described as being "involved with the Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty campaign", in connection with bomb attacks against two of HLS's clients in California.<ref name="Doyle">Doyle, Leonard. , ''The Telegraph'', 24 April 2009.</ref> San Diego was added to the ] List in 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/wanted_terrorists/daniel-andreas-san-diego/view|title=FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists List: Daniel Andreas San Diego|date=2009-04-21|publisher=FBI|access-date=2011-01-18}}</ref> | |||
In June 2005, a ]-based brokerage announced that it had dropped a client, Phytopharm PLC, in response to the May 2005 ALF firebombing of a car belonging to Canaccord executive Michael Kendall. The ALF stated on its website that activists placed an "incendiary device" under the car, which was in Kendall's garage at home when it caught fire during the night. Kendall and his family went into hiding. | |||
==Convictions and legislation== | |||
Phytopharm was targeted, as were those doing business with it, because it had business links with HLS. The ALF warned Phytopharm to stay away from HLS or "see your share price crash and your supporters property go up in flames." | |||
SHAC's campaign prompted the introduction of sections 145–149 of the British ], which created new offences intended to protect animal-testing facilities, including prohibiting acts or threats intended to cause someone to terminate or not enter into a contract with such a facility.<ref>Tempest, Matthew. , ''The Guardian'', 31 January 2005</ref><ref>, House of Commons, 2005.</ref> The first person to be convicted under the Act was Joseph Harris, a doctor of ], who attacked property owned by companies supplying materials to HLS; he received a three-year sentence.<ref>, BBC News, 20 September 2006.</ref> In February 2007, a number of SHAC supporters were charged with illegal street collecting without a licence.<ref>Smit, Martina. , thisislocallondon.co.uk, 22 February 2007.</ref> According to the Metropolitan Police, two stalls in London's Oxford Street collected over £80,000 a year. In March 2007, three activists were jailed under the Act for intimidating HLS suppliers; one supplier dropped its contract with HLS after being invaded by demonstrators wearing skull masks.<ref>, BBC News, 6 March 2007.</ref> | |||
==Criticism of SHAC== | |||
===Violence=== | |||
A criticism of SHAC is that their claim to be non-violent is open to challenge. Activists may use the information published by SHAC for bomb hoaxes or to cause criminal damage — those associated with HLS often have their cars damaged by paint-stripper, for example. | |||
{{anchor|SHAC 7}} | |||
The ] (SPLC), widely known for monitoring U.S. domestic extremism and reporting on the activities of hate groups, included SHAC in its fall 2002 ''Intelligence Report''. In an article entitled "From Push to Shove," the SPLC described SHAC’s ''modus operandi'' as "frankly terroristic tactics similar to those of anti-abortion extremists." | |||
===2006: SHAC 7 (U.S.)=== | |||
SHAC say they do not condone illegal activities and only publish names and addresses so that people can protest peacefully and legally. However, according to testimony to the British parliament on ], ], an internal SHAC document amounts to training for illegal harassment campaigns. Alleged quotes included: | |||
] | |||
In March 2006, a federal jury in ], found six members of SHAC guilty of using their website to incite attacks on those who did business with HLS.<ref>Kocieniewski, David. , ''The New York Times'', 3 March 2006.</ref> Originally, seven individuals (the SHAC 7) were charged: Kevin Kjonaas (also known as Kevin Jonas, former president of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2007/animal-rights-activists-get-prison-web-threat-case|title=Animal Rights Activists Get Prison in Web Threat Case|website=Southern Poverty Law Center}}</ref>), Lauren Gazzola, ], Joshua Harper, ], Darius Fullmer, and John McGee. McGee was later dropped from the case.<ref>, ''Portland Radicle'', July 2013.</ref> They were charged with conspiracy to violate the ], in the first application of the 1992 statute. Jonas, Gazzola, Conroy, and Harper were charged with conspiracy to harass using a telecommunications device (discussing ]es), while Jonas, Gazzola, Conroy, and SHAC USA were charged with stalking via the internet. The defence of the SHAC 7 rested largely on the 1969 case '']'', in which the ] ruled that political speech is legal unless it can be shown that a defendant incited others to commit imminent unlawful acts of violence.<ref>, ''Mother Jones'', January/February 2006.</ref> During the trial, the defendants were prohibited from providing evidence of animal cruelty taking place at Huntingdon Life Sciences testing laboratories.<ref>{{cite news |last=Lennard |first=Natasha |date=January 30, 2022 |title=Prosecutors Silence Evidence of Cruel Factory Farm Practices in Animal Rights Cases |url=https://theintercept.com/2022/01/30/animal-rights-activists-dxe-trial-evidence/ |work=The Intercept |location= |access-date=February 2, 2022}}</ref> | |||
<blockquote>A simple tactic has been adopted recently. Pick your target. Throw a couple of rape alarms in their roof guttering or thick hedgerow, and leg it ... Being kept awake at night hardly puts you in a good mood at work or with your family ... Another idea is to set off extra loud fireworks from a safe distance that will wake up the HLS scum and everybody else for miles around ... From the comfort of your own home, you can swamp all these bastards with send no money offers. They cause huge inconvenience and can give them a bad credit rating. Order them taxis, pizzas, curries, etc, the possibilities are endless. Above all, stay free and safe, and don't get caught. The more preparation you do the better ... Think, think, think. Don't lick stamps, use gloves when pasting stuff ... No idle talk in pubs. Burn your shoes and clothes after your night of action. </blockquote> | |||
In 2011, ] reported that Andrew Stepanian of the SHAC 7—since released—had been imprisoned in the highly restrictive ] of the U.S. federal prison system.<ref name=npr2/> | |||
Kevin Jonas, the leader of of SHAC-USA told the Southern Poverty Law Group's ''Intelligence Report'': "There's a very famous quote by John F. Kennedy. If you make peaceful revolution impossible, you make violent revolution inevitable." | |||
In 2019 Joaquin Phoenix produced 'The Animal People'; a documentary about the SHAC 7 defendants.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Animal People|url=https://www.finngatepictures.com/theanimalpeople|access-date=2021-05-09|website=FINNGATE|language=en}}</ref> | |||
===Other criticism=== | |||
===2007: Operation Achilles (UK)=== | |||
SHAC adversaries claim that the campaign's tactics are not working. HLS managing director Brian Cass says that, since the formation of SHAC in 1999, HLS has seen the value of orders placed with it double to just under £100 million worth of custom (''London Evening Standard'', ], ]). | |||
On 1 May 2007, a series of raids—Operation Achilles—took place against SHAC in Europe, involving 700 police officers in England, Amsterdam, and Belgium.<ref name=Evers>Evers, Marco. , , ''Der Spiegel'', 19 November 2007.</ref> Thirty-two people were arrested, including Greg and Natasha Avery, and Heather Nicholson, who were charged with blackmail, along with nine others.<ref>, ''The Guardian'', 2 May 2007.</ref> | |||
Prosecutors told jurors that a 2007 meeting between the defendants had been bugged by police, and revealed that SHAC supported illegal acts that were traced to attacks on people across Great Britain. The prosecution also alleged there was evidence of direct email links between SHAC, the Animal Liberation Front, and Animal Rights Militia.<ref>, BBC News, 6 October 2008.</ref> ''Der Spiegel'' wrote that as a result of the police operation the number of attacks on HLS and associated businesses declined drastically,<ref name=Evers/> although the day after the convictions new posts on SHAC's website indicated that the campaign would continue.<ref>, ''The Daily Telegraph'', 24 December 2008.</ref> | |||
HLS says it abides by British animal welfare laws. Critics of SHAC argue that these laws are already among the world's strictest laws on animal use in medical testing; closing down HLS would mean displacing animal testing to smaller laboratories in the UK, they say, or moving the testing to a country with less strict laws on animal testing. | |||
SHAC's efforts are susceptible to the problems common to ], namely that an entirely unconnected person may be targeted or affected. SHAC relies on leaked information regarding HLS's current clients and staff members, which means the details may not be timely or accurate. The company says that SHAC has occasionally harassed staff who had already left HLS. | |||
SHAC supporters have been seen soliciting donations to their cause at street stands in the UK with leaflets and collection cans. As SHAC is not a registered charity, it is obvious then that donors cannot be sure that the funds raised are used for SHAC activities. | |||
SHAC critics claim that the way the campaign decorates its stands gives a misleading impression. ]s make up 84% of animals used for testing in the UK, cats and dogs make up 0.3%, monkeys 0.1%. (though these general cross-country percentages do not indicate how many of each species is used for testing by HLS). SHAC's critics say that if the picture choices at the stands are not exactly in this proportion, the SHAC supporters are misrepresenting animal experimentation and are committing a fallacious ]. | |||
===Legal action against SHAC=== | |||
Many companies targeted by SHAC have obtained ] ]s against SHAC, under the Protection From Harassment Act. These include HLS itself, Chiron UK, Phytopharm, Daiichi UK, Asahi Glass, Eisai, Yamanouchi Pharma, Sankyo Pharma, and BOC. The injunctions compel SHAC to print the injunction on their website, so that SHAC's action targets are juxtaposed with a legal notification that there is a 50-yard exclusion zone around the homes of employees and places of business. Protest outside HLS itself may only occur one day a week with police presence. | |||
These injunctions are not permanent. HLS tried but failed to obtain a permanent injunction against SHAC, which represented itself, on ], ]. SHAC's argument against the enforceability of such injunctions was that, despite having hundreds of supporters, a website, mailing address, telephone information hotline, mailing list and bank account, it does not exist as a corporate or charitable body, and therefore its supporters cannot be legally prevented from taking action against HLS. | |||
Tim Lawson-Cruttenden, lawyer for HLS, has explored a novel legal avenue to hold SHAC financially accountable. HLS sought £205,000 reparation from the owner of a property SHAC used as a mailing address, for the costs incurred in its harassment suit, or the forfeit of the property in lieu. | |||
===British government response=== | |||
On ] ], the British government released a paper called "Animal Welfare - Human Rights: protecting people from animal rights extremists." The paper specifically mentioned HLS, though not SHAC. It stated: | |||
<blockquote>Animal rights extremists are highly organized and fully prepared to resort to a wide range of illegal tactics to intimidate and harass people engaged in lawful activity. This goes far beyond the legitimate boundaries of peaceful protest and freedom of expression. To provide an effective response, our law enforcement and criminal justice system needs to be every bit as concerted and determined in response. The Government is therefore following a clear strategy to crack down on this activity. We shall systematically enforce the law, with the police and criminal justice system working together to target extremism and extremists. We shall ensure that campaigns of intimidation and violence for extremist ends are presented to the courts as aggravating factors when sentencing those convicted of existing offences. (pdf)</blockquote> | |||
The paper outlined: | |||
* what it says are the benefits of medical research which, it states, would not be possible without animal studies; | |||
* the alleged commercial value of the bio-medical industry in the UK; | |||
* that the government is concerned for the ] of animals and that all steps to replace the use of animals have and will continue to be taken; | |||
* that animal-rights extremists are interested in harassment and intimidation, not in changing the law or seeking civil discourse; | |||
* that the government listens to law-abiding animal-rights and welfare groups and enacts legislation where appropriate — for example, ] officers now have the power to investigate animal abuse claims on the spot, and the ] test was permanently banned in the UK after peaceful, lawful lobbying by the ]; | |||
* the existing laws used to prosecute animal-rights activists; | |||
* new laws, and the proposed amendments to existing legislation. | |||
====Parallel anti-terror developments==== | |||
On ], ], a further development in Britain's already stringent anti-terror laws was proposed by Home Secretary ] in response to the ]. The new law, with cross party support, would establish the crimes of "acts preparatory to terrorism" and "indirect incitement to terrorism". This latter, in particular, seems likely to be available to pursue SHAC if cases such as the Brian Cass assault occur once the law comes into effect. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*] | *] | ||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
== |
==References== | ||
<references> | |||
{{div col}} | |||
<ref name=npr2> | |||
, Margot Williams and Alyson Hurt, ], 3 March 2011; retrieved 4 March 2011.</ref> | |||
{{div col end}}</references> | |||
==Further reading== | |||
* | |||
{{Refbegin}} | |||
* shot inside HLS by SHAC. | |||
;External links | |||
*, filmed at the Huntingdon Research Centre, England. Size: 8.6 megabytes. Format: MPEG | |||
* | |||
*, filmed at the HLS Princeton Research Centre, NJ, USA. Size: 5.8 megabytes. Format: Quicktime Movie. | |||
* | * | ||
*; see on ''YouTube''. | |||
*, a website set up by SHAC | |||
*, describes five undercover investigations into HLS between 1989 and 2001 | |||
* an article by the British Union for the Abolition of Vivesection (BUAV) | |||
*, ''Uncaged Campaigns'', accessed 17 January 2011. | |||
* by Brian Carnell, December 4, 2001 | |||
* , SHAC, 9-minute video on ''YouTube'', 2006. | |||
* (pdf) by Jon Robbins, ''The Lawyer'', August 16, 2004 | |||
* , SHAC, 4-minute video on ''YouTube'', 2005. | |||
* by Neville Dean, ''The Scotsman'', January 19, 2005 | |||
*, BBC, August 16, 2001 | |||
* by Jamie Doward and Mark Townsend, ''The Observer'', August 1, 2004 | |||
*"Terrorist target lab's shareholders," by David Harrison, ''Sunday Telegraph'', December 03, 2000 | |||
*"Behind the razor wire with the man from Huntingdon", by Michael Pilgrim, ''Evening Standard'', March 31, 2003 | |||
*, ''Centre for Consumer Freedom'', Activistcash.com, undated | |||
* ''Hansard'', March 19, 2003 | |||
* by Brian Carnell, ''Animal Rights.net, October 9, 2004 | |||
* by Rosie Murray-West, ''Daily Telegraph'', June 24, 2004 | |||
* ''Vivisection.info'', undated. | |||
* Southern Poverty Law Group ''Intelligence Report'', Fall 2002 | |||
* by Mark Townsend, ''The Observer'', April 20, 2003 | |||
*, ''Uncaged Campaigns'' | |||
;Books and articles | |||
==Further reading== | |||
*Bhattacharya, Shaoni. , ''New Scientist'', 22 April 2004. | |||
* | |||
*British Home Office. , July 2004. | |||
* | |||
*Cox, Simon and Vadon, Richard. , BBC Radio 4, retrieved 18 June 2006. | |||
* by Shaoni Bhattacharya, ''New Scientist'', April 22, 2004 | |||
*{{cite journal|title=The SHAC Model: A Critical Assessment|pages=11–28|journal=]|author=CrimethInc. Ex-Workers Collective|author-link=CrimethInc. Ex-Workers Collective|issue=6|date=Fall 2006|url=http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/rollingthunder/shac.php|access-date=28 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161212223223/http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/rollingthunder/shac.php|archive-date=12 December 2016|url-status=dead}} | |||
* | |||
*Gibson, Ian. ''Hansard'', 19 March 2003. | |||
* by Andrew Blake, director of ''Seriously Ill for Medical Research'' (SIMR), July 2000 | |||
*Robbins, John. , ''The Lawyer'', 16 August 2004. | |||
*Lennard, Natasha. '']''. 12 December 2019 | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
{{Atestingend}} | |||
] | |||
{{Animal rights|state=collapsed|topics}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty}} | |||
==Unrelated acronym== | |||
] | |||
*] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 01:15, 29 November 2024
Organization "SHAC" redirects here. For other uses, see SHAC (disambiguation).
Focus | Animal-rights campaign to close Huntingdon Life Sciences. Opposition to animal testing. |
---|---|
Location |
|
Origins | England |
Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) was an international animal rights campaign to close down Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS), Europe's largest contract animal-testing laboratory. HLS tests medical and non-medical substances on around 75,000 animals every year, from rats to primates. It has been the subject of several major leaks or undercover investigations by activists and reporters since 1989.
SHAC was started by three British animal rights activists—Greg Avery, Heather James, and Natasha Dellemagne—after video footage supposed to have been shot covertly inside HLS in 1997 by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) showed HLS staff shaking, punching, and shouting at beagles in their care. The footage was broadcast by Channel 4 in the UK, the employees were dismissed and prosecuted, and HLS's licence to perform animal experiments was revoked for six months. PETA stopped its protests against the company after HLS threatened it with legal action, and SHAC took over as a leaderless resistance.
The campaign used tactics ranging from non-violent protest to the alleged firebombing of houses owned by executives associated with HLS's clients and investors. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which monitors US domestic extremism, has described SHAC's modus operandi as "frankly terroristic tactics similar to those of anti-abortion extremists," and in 2005 an official with the FBI's counter-terrorism division referred to SHAC's activities in the United States as domestic terrorist threats.
In 2009 and 2010, 13 members of SHAC, including Avery, James, and Dellemagne, were jailed for between 15 months and eleven years on charges of conspiracy to blackmail or harm HLS and its suppliers.
Background
HLS tests household cleaners, pesticides, weedkillers, food additives, chemicals for use in industry, and drugs for use against Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and cancer. It kills around 75,000 animals every year, including rats, rabbits, pigs, dogs, and primates (marmosets and macaques).
The company has been the subject of several undercover investigations since 1989. Sarah Kite of the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) secured a job and filmed inside HLS in 1989. Zoe Broughton did the same for Channel 4 in 1996, as Michelle Rokke claimed to have done for PETA in 1997. Lucy Johnston for The Daily Express gained access in 2000. A diary kept by Kite, who worked undercover there for eight months, alleged that HLS workers routinely mishandled the animals, shouting at them, throwing them into their cages, and mocking them for having fits in response to toxicity tests. In 1997, Zoe Broughton came out with footage showing puppies being hit and shaken. A year later, Michelle Rokke allegedly obtained footage of the vivisection of a monkey in HLS in New Jersey, in which a technician expresses concern that the animal is inadequately anaesthetized. Between 2006 and 2008, an Animal Defenders International employee filmed undercover inside HLS after securing a position inside its primate toxicology unit in Cambridgeshire.
According to Mark Matfield of the Research Defence Society, a pro-animal testing lobby group in the UK, HLS lost a great deal of business after these investigations, primarily among the pharmaceutical industry. "There was an ingrained feeling among scientists and business people that this company had transgressed in a very serious way," he said.
Structure
SHAC UK
SHAC was founded in November 1999 by Greg Avery; his second wife, Natasha Avery (née Dellemagne); and his first wife, Heather Nicholson (née James). Avery and Nicholson had been involved in previous high-profile campaigns against facilities in the UK that bred animals for laboratories. In 1997, after a ten-month campaign, they caused the closure of Consort Kennels, which bred beagles for animal research. Later that year, they started Save the Hill Grove Cats against Hill Grove farm in Oxfordshire, which bred cats for laboratories. The farm closed after two years.
They would meet every three months to receive updates from colleagues in the United States and Europe. Sarah Whitehead, an experienced campaigner known in the group as "Mumsy", would lead younger members and carry out up to five attacks in a night, according to the judge.
Methods
Secondary and tertiary targeting
SHAC's modus operandi is known as secondary and tertiary targeting. Activists engage in direct action—ranging from lawful protests to intimidation, harassment, and violent attacks—not only against HLS, its employees, and its employees' families, but also against secondary and tertiary targets such as HLS's business partners, and their business partners, insurers, caterers, cleaners, children's nursery schools, and office suppliers. A New York yacht club, for example, was covered in red paint because members of the club worked for Carr Securities, which traded in HLS shares. The campaign drove down HLS's profits, suppressed its share price, and made it difficult to find business and financial partners.
In 2001, HLS managing director in the UK, Brian Cass, was beaten outside his home by three masked men – animal rights activist David Blenkinsop was sentenced to three years in prison for the attack – and HLS marketing director Andrew Gay was attacked on his doorstep with a chemical spray to his eyes that left him temporarily blinded.
Shareholders
On 21 December 2000, HLS was dropped from the New York Stock Exchange because its market capitalization had fallen below NYSE limits, and on 29 March 2001, HLS lost both of its market makers and its place on the London Stock Exchange. Shortly after this, HLS moved its headquarters to the United States, incorporating as Life Sciences Research (LSR), and secured a $15m loan from investment bank Stephens, Inc, its largest shareholder. In September 2005, after the firebombing of the homes of a Canadian brokerage employee and a British pharmaceutical executive, the New York Stock Exchange asked LSR to delay moving its listing from the OTC Bulletin Board to the main exchange. LSR has since transferred its listing to the NYSE Arca electronic exchange. HLS is no longer a publicly traded company after being bought by CEO Andrew Baker.
In June 2005, Vancouver-based brokerage Canaccord Capital announced that it had dropped a client, Phytopharm PLC, in response to the May 2005 Animal Liberation Front (ALF) firebombing of a car belonging to Canaccord executive Michael Kendall. The ALF stated on its website that activists placed an incendiary device under the car, which was in Kendall's garage at home when it caught fire during the night. Kendall and his family went into hiding. Phytopharm was targeted, as were those doing business with it, because it had business links with HLS.
In May 2006, an anonymous group said it would be writing to every one of GlaxoSmithKline's 170,000 small investors warning them to sell their shares. The letters began arriving at investors' home addresses on 7 May 2006, asking that shares be sold within 14 days, and that the group be informed of the sale by e-mail via a Hotmail address. The number of letters sent was smaller than claimed; the BBC said at least 50 shareholders received the warning. Writing in The Sunday Telegraph the following week, British Prime Minister Tony Blair expressed support for animal experimentation in the face of an "appalling ... campaign of intimidation."
Ties to the ALF
Kevin Kjonaas – who took charge of SHAC UK while the Averys and James were jailed for six months in 2002 – declared his support for the ALF, and Robin Webb, spokesman for the ALF in the UK, attended and addressed SHAC conferences in the United States.
In 2006 the ALF warned that it was targeting HLS suppliers, and that year firebombed a car belonging to the finance director of Canaccord Capital, a brokerage firm. Members of SHAC said the company had acted as brokers for Phytopharm, which had used HLS for contract testing.
The FBI linked SHAC with attacks claimed by the militant animal rights group, the Animal Liberation Brigade. They issued an arrest warrant for Daniel Andreas San Diego, who they described as being "involved with the Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty campaign", in connection with bomb attacks against two of HLS's clients in California. San Diego was added to the FBI Most Wanted Terrorists List in 2009.
Convictions and legislation
SHAC's campaign prompted the introduction of sections 145–149 of the British Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, which created new offences intended to protect animal-testing facilities, including prohibiting acts or threats intended to cause someone to terminate or not enter into a contract with such a facility. The first person to be convicted under the Act was Joseph Harris, a doctor of molecular biology, who attacked property owned by companies supplying materials to HLS; he received a three-year sentence. In February 2007, a number of SHAC supporters were charged with illegal street collecting without a licence. According to the Metropolitan Police, two stalls in London's Oxford Street collected over £80,000 a year. In March 2007, three activists were jailed under the Act for intimidating HLS suppliers; one supplier dropped its contract with HLS after being invaded by demonstrators wearing skull masks.
2006: SHAC 7 (U.S.)
In March 2006, a federal jury in Trenton, New Jersey, found six members of SHAC guilty of using their website to incite attacks on those who did business with HLS. Originally, seven individuals (the SHAC 7) were charged: Kevin Kjonaas (also known as Kevin Jonas, former president of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA), Lauren Gazzola, Jacob Conroy, Joshua Harper, Andrew Stepanian, Darius Fullmer, and John McGee. McGee was later dropped from the case. They were charged with conspiracy to violate the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, in the first application of the 1992 statute. Jonas, Gazzola, Conroy, and Harper were charged with conspiracy to harass using a telecommunications device (discussing black faxes), while Jonas, Gazzola, Conroy, and SHAC USA were charged with stalking via the internet. The defence of the SHAC 7 rested largely on the 1969 case Brandenburg v. Ohio, in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that political speech is legal unless it can be shown that a defendant incited others to commit imminent unlawful acts of violence. During the trial, the defendants were prohibited from providing evidence of animal cruelty taking place at Huntingdon Life Sciences testing laboratories.
In 2011, NPR reported that Andrew Stepanian of the SHAC 7—since released—had been imprisoned in the highly restrictive Communication Management Unit of the U.S. federal prison system.
In 2019 Joaquin Phoenix produced 'The Animal People'; a documentary about the SHAC 7 defendants.
2007: Operation Achilles (UK)
On 1 May 2007, a series of raids—Operation Achilles—took place against SHAC in Europe, involving 700 police officers in England, Amsterdam, and Belgium. Thirty-two people were arrested, including Greg and Natasha Avery, and Heather Nicholson, who were charged with blackmail, along with nine others. Prosecutors told jurors that a 2007 meeting between the defendants had been bugged by police, and revealed that SHAC supported illegal acts that were traced to attacks on people across Great Britain. The prosecution also alleged there was evidence of direct email links between SHAC, the Animal Liberation Front, and Animal Rights Militia. Der Spiegel wrote that as a result of the police operation the number of attacks on HLS and associated businesses declined drastically, although the day after the convictions new posts on SHAC's website indicated that the campaign would continue.
See also
References
- ^ "A controversial laboratory", BBC News, 18 January 2001.
- "New bill clamps down on animal activist activity" Archived 12 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine, Drug Researcher, 17 November 2006.
- ^ "SPLCenter.org: From Push to Shove". 19 October 2003. Archived from the original on 19 October 2003. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
- Townsend, Mark. "Exposed: secrets of the animal organ lab", The Observer, 20 April 2003.
- ^ "The First Investigation" Archived 27 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine; "It's a Dog's Life" Archived 27 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine (Zoe Broughton for Channel Four in 1996); "HLS busted again" Archived 27 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine (Michelle Rokke for PETA in 1997); and Johnstone, Lucy and Calvert, Jonathan. "Terrible despair of animals cut up in name of research" Archived 27 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine (Lucy Johnston for The Daily Express in 2000).
- Also see Mann, Keith. From Dusk 'til Dawn: An insider's view of the growth of the Animal Liberation Movement. Puppy Pincher Press, 2007, pp. 198–199.
- "Undercover video footage of HLS employees apparently dissecting a live monkey", filmed at the HLS Princeton Research Center, New Jersey, accessed 20 June 2009.
- Alleyne, Richard. "Terror tactics that brought a company to its knees", The Daily Telegraph, 19 January 2001.
- Also see "It's a Dog's Life", Countryside Undercover, Channel Four Television, 1997.
- ^ Doward, Jamie and Townsend, Mark. "Beauty and the beasts", The Observer, 1 August 2004.
- Lewis, John E. "Statement of John Lewis", US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, 26 October 2005, accessed 17 January 2011.
- ^ Evers, Marco. "Resisting the Animal Avengers", Part 1, Part 2, Der Spiegel, 19 November 2007.
- ^ Weaver, Matthew (25 October 2010). "Animal rights activists jailed for terrorising suppliers to Huntingdon Life Sciences". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 17 September 2013.
- "From push to shove" Archived 4 February 2005 at the Wayback Machine Southern Poverty Law Group Intelligence Report, Fall 2002.
- Townsend, Mark. "Exposed: secrets of the animal organ lab", The Observer, 20 April 2003.
- "Huntingdon Life Sciences Investigation", Animal Defenders International, 15 July 2009, accessed 17 January 2011.
- "HLS Infiltrated by Undercover Investigation", indybay.org, accessed 17 January 2011.
- Also see "Save the Primates", Animal Defenders International, shown at the European Parliament in February 2009, courtesy of YouTube, accessed 17 January 2011.
- Rudacille, Deborah. The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The Conflict between Animal Research and Animal Protection. University of California Press, 2001, p. 286.
- Jonas, Kevin (2004). "Chapter: Bricks and Bullhorns". Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?: Reflections on the Liberation of Animals. By Best, Steven; Nocella, Anthony J. Lantern Books. p. 271. ISBN 978-1-59056-054-9.
Today, SHAC is the intelligent and strategic continuation of such a rounded attack, effectively coupling both legal and illegal tactics ... The "SHAC campaign" has come to mean any endeavor aimed at contributing to the legal SHAC efforts, whether it be legal or not. In various legal proceedings we have distinguished SHAC the incorporated group as a news/information clearing house, and the "SHAC campaign" as all other protest activities.
- "Police bugged animal rights group". BBC News. 7 October 2008. Archived from the original on 10 October 2008.
- "Childcare group warned of 'hell'", BBC News, 29 September 2005.
- Also see ["U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works". Archived from the original on 1 August 2008. Retrieved 1 August 2008. U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Lewis, John E. "Statement of John Lewis" Archived 1 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine, U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, 26 October 2005, accessed 17 January 2011.
- "Money talks", The Guardian, 1 June 2006.
- "Lab firm ditched by share brokers", BBC News, 28 March 2001.
- "Huntingdon delays listing after attacks", The Guardian, 8 September 2005.
- "LSR goes private in Lion Holdings takeover", Outsourcing, pharma.com, 1 December 2009.
- Won, Shirley, and Zehr, Leonard. "When threats turn to firebombs, Canaccord cuts loose on client", The Globe and Mail, 24 June 2005.
- "Animal rights activists tell drug firm's small investors to sell up or else", The Guardian, 9 May 2006.
- Glaxo wins injunction over threat, 9 May 2006.
- "Tony Blair: Time to act against animal rights protesters". The Daily Telegraph. 13 May 2006. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
- Laville, Sandra and Campbell, Duncan. "Animal rights extremists in arson spree", The Guardian, 25 June 2006.
- Doyle, Leonard. Animal rights activist added to FBI's most wanted terrorist list, The Telegraph, 24 April 2009.
- "FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists List: Daniel Andreas San Diego". FBI. 21 April 2009. Retrieved 18 January 2011.
- Tempest, Matthew. "Crackdown on animal rights extremists", The Guardian, 31 January 2005
- "Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill", House of Commons, 2005.
- "Animal rights protester is jailed", BBC News, 20 September 2006.
- Smit, Martina. "21 'illegally' collected for animal rights terror", thisislocallondon.co.uk, 22 February 2007.
- "Three 'violent' activists jailed", BBC News, 6 March 2007.
- Kocieniewski, David. "Six Animal Rights Advocates Are Convicted of Terrorism", The New York Times, 3 March 2006.
- "Animal Rights Activists Get Prison in Web Threat Case". Southern Poverty Law Center.
- "ANARCHISM, FEATURED “Sometimes We Had a Brick”, Portland Radicle, July 2013.
- "America's #1 Threat", Mother Jones, January/February 2006.
- Lennard, Natasha (30 January 2022). "Prosecutors Silence Evidence of Cruel Factory Farm Practices in Animal Rights Cases". The Intercept. Retrieved 2 February 2022.
- DATA & GRAPHICS: Population Of The Communications Management Units, Margot Williams and Alyson Hurt, NPR, 3 March 2011; retrieved 4 March 2011.
- "The Animal People". FINNGATE. Retrieved 9 May 2021.
- "Animal rights activists involved in bid to shut lab among 30 arrested in raids", The Guardian, 2 May 2007.
- "Five deny animal rights blackmail ", BBC News, 6 October 2008.
- "Animal activists still continuing campaign of threats and intimidation", The Daily Telegraph, 24 December 2008.
Further reading
- External links
- Indymedia UK SHAC topic page
- The Shac 7
- The footage shot undercover inside HLS by PETA; see the same footage on YouTube.
- "Inside HLS", describes five undercover investigations into HLS between 1989 and 2001
- Diaries of Despair, Uncaged Campaigns, accessed 17 January 2011.
- "Hit 'Em Head On", SHAC, 9-minute video on YouTube, 2006.
- "Time for Action 3", SHAC, 4-minute video on YouTube, 2005.
- Books and articles
- Bhattacharya, Shaoni. Scientists demand law against animal rights extremism, New Scientist, 22 April 2004.
- British Home Office. "Animal Welfare—Human Rights: protecting people from animal rights extremists", July 2004.
- Cox, Simon and Vadon, Richard. "How animal rights took on the world", BBC Radio 4, retrieved 18 June 2006.
- CrimethInc. Ex-Workers Collective (Fall 2006). "The SHAC Model: A Critical Assessment". Rolling Thunder (6): 11–28. Archived from the original on 12 December 2016. Retrieved 28 March 2009.
- Gibson, Ian. Statement by Dr. Ian Gibson (Norwich, North) Hansard, 19 March 2003.
- Robbins, John. "Red in Tooth and Law", The Lawyer, 16 August 2004.
- Lennard, Natasha. How the Prosecution of Animal Rights Activists as Terrorists Foretold Today’s Criminalization of Dissent The Intercept. 12 December 2019