Misplaced Pages

Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:31, 25 January 2005 editGeni (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators37,898 edits Organization: add some sources← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:15, 29 November 2024 edit undo24.177.51.21 (talk) he was captured recently if anyone else wants to mention it 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Organization}}
'''Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty''' (SHAC) is an international ] campaign against ] (HLS), the UK's largest animal-testing laboratory, which is based in ], ] and in ] in the ].
{{Redirect|SHAC}}
SHAC was initiated by British animal rights activists ] and ] in November ] after video footage that had been shot covertly inside the laboratory was aired on British television. The film showed HLS staff abusing animals (such as shouting and laughing at them, shaking and punching them,thereby violating animal protection regulations) as well as falsifying experiments (which could lead to unsafe products being passed as safe and harming humans). The HLS staff responsible were dismissed and prosecuted, and Huntingdon Life Science's Home Office Licence to perform animal experiments was temporarily revoked. Since then, several other investigations and leaked documents have revealed further abuse and incompetence; such as staff turning up for work drunk or taking drugs at work.
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2021}}
]
{{Infobox organization
== Organization ==
| name = Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty
| logo = ]
| type =
| Non-profit_slogan =
| location = UK and US
| origins = England
| product =
| focus = ] campaign to close ]. Opposition to ].
| num_volunteers =
| num_members =
}}


'''Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty''' ('''SHAC''') was an international ] campaign to close down ] (HLS), Europe's largest contract ] laboratory. HLS tests medical and non-medical substances on around 75,000 animals every year, from rats to primates.<ref name="BBCJan182001"/><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070712081822/http://www.drugresearcher.com/news/ng.asp?n=72122-faseb-us-government-huntingdon |date=12 July 2007 }}, ''Drug Researcher'', 17 November 2006.</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2003-10-19 |title=SPLCenter.org: From Push to Shove |url=http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=42 |access-date=2021-12-30 |website= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20031019135845/http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=42 |archive-date=19 October 2003 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>Townsend, Mark. , ''The Observer'', 20 April 2003.</ref> It has been the subject of several major leaks or undercover investigations by activists and reporters since 1989.<ref name=investigations/>
SHAC activities are based on ], protests and ] against HLS, its employees, its employees' families and its business partners. By targeting clients, employees, suppliers, insurers and even the caterers and cleaners of the laboratory, they aim to scare away HLS' clientele and to render the laboratory work as difficult and costly as possible.


SHAC was started by three British animal rights activists—], ], and Natasha Dellemagne—after video footage supposed to have been shot covertly inside HLS in 1997 by ] (PETA) showed HLS staff shaking, punching, and shouting at beagles in their care.<ref>Alleyne, Richard. , ''The Daily Telegraph'', 19 January 2001.
The current spokespeople of SHAC are Greg Avery and his wife, ]. Together with his first wife Heather James, they are responsible for publishing SHAC reports, both via mail and on their website, and providing press information and interviews. They were jailed for six months in December 2001 for criminal incitement. .
*Also see , ''Countryside Undercover'', Channel Four Television, 1997.</ref> The footage was broadcast by ] in the UK, the employees were dismissed and prosecuted, and HLS's licence to perform animal experiments was revoked for six months. PETA stopped its protests against the company after HLS threatened it with legal action, and SHAC took over as a ].<ref name=DowardAug2004>Doward, Jamie and Townsend, Mark. , ''The Observer'', 1 August 2004.</ref>


The campaign used tactics ranging from non-violent protest to the alleged firebombing of houses owned by executives associated with HLS's clients and investors. The ] (SPLC), which monitors US domestic extremism, has described SHAC's ''modus operandi'' as "frankly terroristic tactics similar to those of anti-abortion extremists," and in 2005 an official with the FBI's counter-terrorism division referred to SHAC's activities in the United States as domestic terrorist threats.<ref name=":0" /><ref>Lewis, John E. , US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, 26 October 2005, accessed 17 January 2011.</ref>
The SHAC website and mailing list serves as a platform for supporters. "Action reports" are published on the website and mailed out to supporters. Also published are possible targets of the campaign and the companies that have severed their links with HLS.


In 2009 and 2010, 13 members of SHAC, including Avery, James, and Dellemagne, were jailed for between 15 months and eleven years on charges of conspiracy to blackmail or harm HLS and its suppliers.<ref name="Evers"/><ref name=Weaver>{{cite web|last=Weaver|first=Matthew|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/oct/25/animal-research-animal-welfare|title=Animal rights activists jailed for terrorising suppliers to Huntingdon Life Sciences|work=The Guardian|date=25 October 2010|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130917122937/https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/oct/25/animal-research-animal-welfare|archive-date=17 September 2013}}</ref>
SHAC is not a closed organization, but is an assembly of individuals and independent groups with shared goals and principles who are regarded by SHAC as responsible for their own actions. SHAC says it refrains from any action that might physically harm human or non-human animals. However, destruction of property and the intimidation of HLS supporters is deemed acceptable.


==Background==
] used by SHAC supporters has included violence, harassment, intimidation with death-threat letters and hoax bombs, arson, trespass, vandalism and destruction of property. Despite SHAC's stated policy of non-violent direct action, isolated physical attacks have occurred, such as the assault on Brian Cass, manager director of HLS, who was attacked outside his home in February 2001 by three men armed with pickaxe handles and CS gas. .
<!-- Deleted image removed: .</ref>]] -->
HLS tests household cleaners, pesticides, weedkillers, food additives, chemicals for use in industry, and drugs for use against Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and cancer.<ref name=BBCJan182001>, BBC News, 18 January 2001.</ref> It kills around 75,000 animals every year, including rats, rabbits, pigs, dogs, and primates (marmosets and macaques).<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050204063555/http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=42 |date=4 February 2005 }} Southern Poverty Law Group ''Intelligence Report'', Fall 2002.
*Townsend, Mark. , ''The Observer'', 20 April 2003.</ref>


The company has been the subject of several undercover investigations since 1989. Sarah Kite of the ] (BUAV) secured a job and filmed inside HLS in 1989. Zoe Broughton did the same for Channel 4 in 1996, as Michelle Rokke claimed to have done for PETA in 1997. Lucy Johnston for ''The Daily Express'' gained access in 2000. A diary kept by Kite, who worked undercover there for eight months, alleged that HLS workers routinely mishandled the animals, shouting at them, throwing them into their cages, and mocking them for having fits in response to toxicity tests. In 1997, Zoe Broughton came out with footage showing puppies being hit and shaken. A year later, Michelle Rokke allegedly obtained footage of the ] of a monkey in HLS in New Jersey, in which a technician expresses concern that the animal is inadequately anaesthetized.<ref name=investigations> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080827213152/http://www.insidehls.com/inside_kite.htm |date=27 August 2008 }}; {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080827213115/http://www.insidehls.com/inside_broughton.htm |date=27 August 2008 }} (Zoe Broughton for Channel Four in 1996); {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080827212839/http://www.insidehls.com/inside_rokke.htm |date=27 August 2008 }} (Michelle Rokke for PETA in 1997); and Johnstone, Lucy and Calvert, Jonathan. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080827213308/http://www.insidehls.com/inside_xeno.htm |date=27 August 2008 }} (Lucy Johnston for ''The Daily Express'' in 2000).
=== Relationship with the Animal Liberation Front ===
*Also see Mann, Keith. ''From Dusk 'til Dawn: An insider's view of the growth of the Animal Liberation Movement''. Puppy Pincher Press, 2007, pp. 198–199.
*, filmed at the HLS Princeton Research Center, New Jersey, accessed 20 June 2009.</ref> Between 2006 and 2008, an ] employee filmed undercover inside HLS after securing a position inside its primate toxicology unit in Cambridgeshire.<ref>, Animal Defenders International, 15 July 2009, accessed 17 January 2011.
*, indybay.org, accessed 17 January 2011.
*Also see , Animal Defenders International, shown at the European Parliament in February 2009, courtesy of ''YouTube'', accessed 17 January 2011.</ref>


According to Mark Matfield of the ], a pro-animal testing lobby group in the UK, HLS lost a great deal of business after these investigations, primarily among the pharmaceutical industry. "There was an ingrained feeling among scientists and business people that this company had transgressed in a very serious way," he said.<ref name=Rudacille>Rudacille, Deborah. ''The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The Conflict between Animal Research and Animal Protection''. University of California Press, 2001, p. 286.<!-- ISBN needed, if one exists --></ref>
The SHAC spokespersons disclaim any connection between its campaign and attacks carried out by some activists using the name ]. However, the SHAC website regularly features ALF news and Kevin Jonas, the leader of SHAC USA and temporary office helper of SHAC UK while Greg Avery was in prison, has declared his "unequivocal support for the Animal Liberation Front" . Some SHAC activists have also committed crimes which were claimed on behalf of the ALF. For example, Dave Blenkinsop was jailed both for his attack on Brian Cass and for bombing poultry vans, with the latter being claimed on behalf of the ALF. Like SHAC, the ALF is not a closed organization, but is largely a name used for certain types of actions, which are carried out all over the world by individuals or small groups. It therefore impossible to say with any certainty how much overlap there is between SHAC actions and ALF actions.


==Structure==
== Effects of campaign on HLS==


===SHAC UK===
When the SHAC campaign started in 1999, Greg Avery vowed to close HLS "within three years". While this was not achieved, SHAC's efforts have had an impact on HLS's business deals, share price and profits. The SHAC website maintains a list of companies that have severed business relations with HLS . ], this includes 101 companies and organizations. The UK ] had to insure HLS, as all previous insurers abandoned HLS after they were targeted by SHAC actions.
<!-- Deleted image removed: ] founded SHAC with Greg Avery and Natasha Dellemagne. They were sentenced in 2009 to 11 and nine years imprisonment.]] -->
SHAC was founded in November 1999 by Greg Avery; his second wife, Natasha Avery (née Dellemagne); and his first wife, Heather Nicholson (née James). Avery and Nicholson had been involved in previous high-profile campaigns against facilities in the UK that bred animals for laboratories. In 1997, after a ten-month campaign, they caused the closure of ], which bred beagles for animal research. Later that year, they started ] against Hill Grove farm in Oxfordshire, which bred cats for laboratories. The farm closed after two years.<ref name=Jonas>{{cite book|contributor-last=Jonas|contributor-first=Kevin|contributor-link=Kevin Kjonaas|contribution=Chapter: Bricks and Bullhorns|last1=Best|first1=Steven|last2=Nocella|first2=Anthony J|title=Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?: Reflections on the Liberation of Animals|publisher=Lantern Books|date=2004|page=271|quote="Today, SHAC is the intelligent and strategic continuation of such a rounded attack, effectively coupling both legal and illegal tactics ... The "SHAC campaign" has come to mean any endeavor aimed at contributing to the legal SHAC efforts, whether it be legal or not. In various legal proceedings we have distinguished SHAC the incorporated group as a news/information clearing house, and the "SHAC campaign" as all other protest activities."|isbn=978-1-59056-054-9|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1juWE6y1C1QC&pg=PA271}}</ref>


They would meet every three months to receive updates from colleagues in the United States and Europe.<ref name=Bugged>{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7657837.stm|title=Police bugged animal rights group|publisher=BBC News|date=7 October 2008|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081010145641/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7657837.stm|archive-date=10 October 2008}}</ref> Sarah Whitehead, an experienced campaigner known in the group as "Mumsy", would lead younger members and carry out up to five attacks in a night, according to the judge.<ref name=Weaver/>
In ], SHAC obtained a list of HLS shareholders. This list included the names of ''beneficial owners'': anonymous persons and companies who bought shares using the name of a third person. Shareholders included the pension funds of the ], ] cars and the ]. This list was leaked to the press and the ] ran it as their lead story. Several beneficial owners disposed of their shares after publication. Two weeks later, an equity stake of 32 million shares was placed on the ] for one pence each. HLS quotes crashed immediately. The ] closed HLS's bank account and the British government forced the ] to give them an account. The ] said "Huntingdon Life Sciences are in a nightmare situation."


===Methods===
On ] ], HLS was dropped from the ] because of HLS's share collapse; HLS's ] had fallen below NYSE limits and the NYSE did not accept HLS's revised business plan to restore its position. On ] ], HLS lost both of its ]s and its place on the main platform of ].


====Secondary and tertiary targeting====
Due to SHAC's use of public records in the sending of malicious threats to all investors in HLS, HLS moved its financial centre to the ] and incorporated in ] as Life Sciences Research, Inc., in order to take advantage of stricter U.S. securities laws, which allow greater anonymity of shareholders. HLS currently trades on the ]'s ] as "LSRI". Maryland allows shareholders with less than 5% holdings to remain anonymous. Partly as a result of this experience, the British government has changed the law so that smaller investors in a company are not publicly listed.
SHAC's ''modus operandi'' is known as secondary and tertiary targeting. Activists engage in ]—ranging from lawful protests to intimidation, harassment, and violent attacks—not only against HLS, its employees, and its employees' families, but also against secondary and tertiary targets such as HLS's business partners, and ''their'' business partners, insurers, caterers, cleaners, children's nursery schools, and office suppliers.<ref>, BBC News, 29 September 2005.
*Also see {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080801014736/http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=247787 |date=1 August 2008 }}, U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, 26 October 2005, accessed 17 January 2011.</ref> The campaign drove down HLS's profits, suppressed its share price, and made it difficult to find business and financial partners.<ref>, ''The Guardian'', 1 June 2006.
*, BBC News, 28 March 2001.</ref>


In 2001, HLS managing director in the UK, ], was beaten outside his home by three masked men – animal rights activist David Blenkinsop was sentenced to three years in prison for the attack – and HLS marketing director Andrew Gay was attacked on his doorstep with a chemical spray to his eyes that left him temporarily blinded.<ref name=":0" />


====Shareholders====
HLS was saved from bankruptcy when the its largest shareholder, American investment bank ], gave the company a 15-million-dollar loan. SHAC supporters reacted by targeting Stephens, Inc. .


On 21 December 2000, HLS was dropped from the New York Stock Exchange because its ] had fallen below NYSE limits, and on 29 March 2001, HLS lost both of its ]s and its place on the London Stock Exchange. Shortly after this, HLS moved its headquarters to the United States, incorporating as Life Sciences Research (LSR), and secured a $15m loan from investment bank ], its largest shareholder. In September 2005, after the firebombing of the homes of a Canadian brokerage employee and a British pharmaceutical executive, the New York Stock Exchange asked LSR to delay moving its listing from the ] to the main exchange.<ref>, ''The Guardian'', 8 September 2005.</ref> LSR has since transferred its listing to the ] electronic exchange. HLS is no longer a publicly traded company after being bought by CEO Andrew Baker.<ref>, ''Outsourcing'', pharma.com, 1 December 2009.</ref>
HLS is not in the clear though as is shown by their $87.5 Million debt and recently leaked documents (25th Jan 2005) . This does not provide a promising outlook for the company and investors have not returned to the company as the share price is still unstable.


In June 2005, Vancouver-based brokerage ] announced that it had dropped a client, Phytopharm PLC, in response to the May 2005 ] (ALF) firebombing of a car belonging to Canaccord executive Michael Kendall. The ALF stated on its website that activists placed an incendiary device under the car, which was in Kendall's garage at home when it caught fire during the night. Kendall and his family went into hiding. Phytopharm was targeted, as were those doing business with it, because it had business links with HLS.<ref>Won, Shirley, and Zehr, Leonard. {{dead link|date=June 2018|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}, ''The Globe and Mail'', 24 June 2005.</ref>
SHAC targets anyone who is linked to HLS ranging from suppliers, customers, investors (although this has reduced since many were able to remain anonymous) and workers. SHAC claims it is attempting to show that supporting the actions of HLS should not be acceptable in a modern society.


In May 2006, an anonymous group said it would be writing to every one of GlaxoSmithKline's 170,000 small investors warning them to sell their shares. The letters began arriving at investors' home addresses on 7 May 2006, asking that shares be sold within 14 days, and that the group be informed of the sale by e-mail via a Hotmail address.<ref>, ''The Guardian'', 9 May 2006.</ref> The number of letters sent was smaller than claimed; the BBC said at least 50 shareholders received the warning.<ref>, 9 May 2006.</ref> Writing in ''The Sunday Telegraph'' the following week, British Prime Minister ] expressed support for animal experimentation in the face of an ''"appalling ... campaign of intimidation."''<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1518328/Tony-Blair-Time-to-act-against-animal-rights-protesters.html|title=Tony Blair: Time to act against animal rights protesters|journal=The Daily Telegraph|date=2006-05-13|access-date=2018-01-26|language=en-GB|issn=0307-1235}}</ref>
==Direct Action==
SHAC direct action tactics range from passive ] to active law-breaking. SHAC supporters have also infiltrated Huntingdon Life Sciences several times and were able to shoot video footage and photos from inside the laboratories.


==Criticisms of SHAC== ===Ties to the ALF===
Kevin Kjonaas – who took charge of SHAC UK while the Averys and James were jailed for six months in 2002 – declared his support for the ALF, and ], spokesman for the ALF in the UK, attended and addressed SHAC conferences in the United States.<ref name=DowardAug2004/>


In 2006 the ALF warned that it was targeting HLS suppliers, and that year firebombed a car belonging to the finance director of Canaccord Capital, a brokerage firm. Members of SHAC said the company had acted as brokers for ], which had used HLS for contract testing.<ref>Laville, Sandra and Campbell, Duncan. , ''The Guardian'', 25 June 2006.</ref>
SHAC adversaries claim that the campaign's tactics are not working. Brian Cass claims that, since the formation of SHAC in 1999, HLS has seen the value of orders placed with it double to just under £100 million worth of custom ("Behind the razor wire with the man from Huntingdon", by Michael Pilgrim, ''The Evening Standard'', London, March 31, 2003).


The FBI linked SHAC with attacks claimed by the militant animal rights group, the ]. They issued an arrest warrant for ], who they described as being "involved with the Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty campaign", in connection with bomb attacks against two of HLS's clients in California.<ref name="Doyle">Doyle, Leonard. , ''The Telegraph'', 24 April 2009.</ref> San Diego was added to the ] List in 2009.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/wanted_terrorists/daniel-andreas-san-diego/view|title=FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists List: Daniel Andreas San Diego|date=2009-04-21|publisher=FBI|access-date=2011-01-18}}</ref>
HLS says it abides by British animal welfare laws. Critics of SHAC argue that these laws are already among the world's strictest laws on animal use in medical testing; closing down HLS would mean displacing animal testing to smaller laboratories in the UK or moving the testing to a country with less strict laws on the treatment of animals in medical testing.


==Convictions and legislation==
SHAC's efforts are susceptible to the problems common to ], namely that an innocent person may be targeted or affected. SHAC relies on stolen information regarding HLS's current clients and staff members, as HLS does not publically reveal this. This information may therefore not be timely or accurate. The company says that SHAC has occasionally harassed staff who had already left HLS.


SHAC's campaign prompted the introduction of sections 145–149 of the British ], which created new offences intended to protect animal-testing facilities, including prohibiting acts or threats intended to cause someone to terminate or not enter into a contract with such a facility.<ref>Tempest, Matthew. , ''The Guardian'', 31 January 2005</ref><ref>, House of Commons, 2005.</ref> The first person to be convicted under the Act was Joseph Harris, a doctor of ], who attacked property owned by companies supplying materials to HLS; he received a three-year sentence.<ref>, BBC News, 20 September 2006.</ref> In February 2007, a number of SHAC supporters were charged with illegal street collecting without a licence.<ref>Smit, Martina. , thisislocallondon.co.uk, 22 February 2007.</ref> According to the Metropolitan Police, two stalls in London's Oxford Street collected over £80,000 a year. In March 2007, three activists were jailed under the Act for intimidating HLS suppliers; one supplier dropped its contract with HLS after being invaded by demonstrators wearing skull masks.<ref>, BBC News, 6 March 2007.</ref>
SHAC supporters have been seen soliciting donations to their cause at street stands in the UK with leaflets and collection cans. As SHAC is not a registered charity, HLS has argued that donors cannot be sure that the funds raised are used for SHAC activities.


{{anchor|SHAC 7}}
SHAC critics claim that the campaign decorates its stands with images of animal psychology experiments from the ]s, now banned, rather than bona-fide images of animal medical testing. ]s make up 84% of animals used for testing in the UK, cats and dogs make up 0.3%, monkeys 0.1%. Use of great apes is banned. Critics say that if the picture choices at the stand are not exactly in this proportion, the SHAC supporters are misrepresenting animal experimentation and are committing a fallacious ].


===2006: SHAC 7 (U.S.)===
A major criticism of SHAC is that their claims of being non-violent are not true. ALF supporters may use the information published by SHAC for illegal purposes such as bomb-hoaxes and criminal damage (those associated with HLS often have their cars damaged by paint-stripper, for example). Also, isolated physical attacks have occurred, such as the assault on Brian Cass, manager director of HLS, who was attacked outside his home in February 2001 by three men armed with pickaxe handles and CS gas. . SHAC claim that they do not condone these illegal activities and only publish names and addresses so that people can peacefully and legally protest.
]


In March 2006, a federal jury in ], found six members of SHAC guilty of using their website to incite attacks on those who did business with HLS.<ref>Kocieniewski, David. , ''The New York Times'', 3 March 2006.</ref> Originally, seven individuals (the SHAC 7) were charged: Kevin Kjonaas (also known as Kevin Jonas, former president of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2007/animal-rights-activists-get-prison-web-threat-case|title=Animal Rights Activists Get Prison in Web Threat Case|website=Southern Poverty Law Center}}</ref>), Lauren Gazzola, ], Joshua Harper, ], Darius Fullmer, and John McGee. McGee was later dropped from the case.<ref>, ''Portland Radicle'', July 2013.</ref> They were charged with conspiracy to violate the ], in the first application of the 1992 statute. Jonas, Gazzola, Conroy, and Harper were charged with conspiracy to harass using a telecommunications device (discussing ]es), while Jonas, Gazzola, Conroy, and SHAC USA were charged with stalking via the internet. The defence of the SHAC 7 rested largely on the 1969 case '']'', in which the ] ruled that political speech is legal unless it can be shown that a defendant incited others to commit imminent unlawful acts of violence.<ref>, ''Mother Jones'', January/February 2006.</ref> During the trial, the defendants were prohibited from providing evidence of animal cruelty taking place at Huntingdon Life Sciences testing laboratories.<ref>{{cite news |last=Lennard |first=Natasha |date=January 30, 2022 |title=Prosecutors Silence Evidence of Cruel Factory Farm Practices in Animal Rights Cases |url=https://theintercept.com/2022/01/30/animal-rights-activists-dxe-trial-evidence/ |work=The Intercept |location= |access-date=February 2, 2022}}</ref>
==Legal action against SHAC==


In 2011, ] reported that Andrew Stepanian of the SHAC 7—since released—had been imprisoned in the highly restrictive ] of the U.S. federal prison system.<ref name=npr2/>
Many companies targeted by SHAC have obtained ] ]s against SHAC, under the ]. This list includes HLS itself, Chiron UK, Phytopharm, Daiichi UK, Asahi Glass, Eisai, Yamanouchi Pharma, Sankyo Pharma and BOC.


In 2019 Joaquin Phoenix produced 'The Animal People'; a documentary about the SHAC 7 defendants.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Animal People|url=https://www.finngatepictures.com/theanimalpeople|access-date=2021-05-09|website=FINNGATE|language=en}}</ref>
These injunctions compel SHAC to print the injunction on their website, so SHAC's action targets are juxtaposed with a legal notification that there is a 50-yard exclusion zone around the homes of employees and places of business. Protest outside HLS itself may only occur one day a week with police presence.


===2007: Operation Achilles (UK)===
These injunctions are not permanent. ], HLS is in court attempting to obtain a permanent injunction against SHAC. SHAC's legal argument against the enforceability of such injuctions is that, despite having hundreds of supporters, a website, mailing address, telephone information hotline, mailing list and bank account, it does not exist as a single, corporate or charitable body, and therefore its supporters cannot be legally prevented from harassing HLS.
On 1 May 2007, a series of raids—Operation Achilles—took place against SHAC in Europe, involving 700 police officers in England, Amsterdam, and Belgium.<ref name=Evers>Evers, Marco. , , ''Der Spiegel'', 19 November 2007.</ref> Thirty-two people were arrested, including Greg and Natasha Avery, and Heather Nicholson, who were charged with blackmail, along with nine others.<ref>, ''The Guardian'', 2 May 2007.</ref>
Prosecutors told jurors that a 2007 meeting between the defendants had been bugged by police, and revealed that SHAC supported illegal acts that were traced to attacks on people across Great Britain. The prosecution also alleged there was evidence of direct email links between SHAC, the Animal Liberation Front, and Animal Rights Militia.<ref>, BBC News, 6 October 2008.</ref> ''Der Spiegel'' wrote that as a result of the police operation the number of attacks on HLS and associated businesses declined drastically,<ref name=Evers/> although the day after the convictions new posts on SHAC's website indicated that the campaign would continue.<ref>, ''The Daily Telegraph'', 24 December 2008.</ref>


==See also==
==British government response==
*]
* ]


==References==
On ] ], the British Government released (PDF). The paper outlines:
<references>
{{div col}}
<ref name=npr2>
, Margot Williams and Alyson Hurt, ], 3 March 2011; retrieved 4 March 2011.</ref>
{{div col end}}</references>


==Further reading==
* The alleged benefits of medical research which, the paper says, would not be possible without animal studies;
{{Refbegin}}
* The alleged commercial value of the bio-medical industry in the UK;
;External links
* That the government is concerned for the ] of animals and that all steps to replace the use of animals have and will continue to be taken;
*
* That animal rights extremists are interested in harassment and intimidation, not in changing the law or seeking civil discourse;
*
* The government listens to law-abiding animal rights and welfare groups and enacts legislation where appropriate -- for example, ] officers now have the power to investigate animal abuse claims on the spot, and the ] test was permanently banned in the UK after peaceful, lawful lobbying by the ];
*; see on ''YouTube''.
* The existing laws used to prosecute animal rights activists;
*, describes five undercover investigations into HLS between 1989 and 2001
* Proposed amendments and new laws
*, ''Uncaged Campaigns'', accessed 17 January 2011.
* , SHAC, 9-minute video on ''YouTube'', 2006.
* , SHAC, 4-minute video on ''YouTube'', 2005.


;Books and articles
The paper specifically mentions HLS. It does not mention SHAC. It further states: "Animal rights extremists are highly organized and fully prepared to resort to a wide range of illegal tactics to intimidate and harass people engaged in lawful activity. This goes far beyond the legitimate boundaries of peaceful protest and freedom of expression. To provide an effective response, our law enforcement and criminal justice system needs to be every bit as concerted and determined in response. The Government is therefore following a clear strategy to crack down on this activity. We shall systematically enforce the law, with the police and criminal justice system working together to target extremism and extremists. We shall ensure that campaigns of intimidation and violence for extremist ends are presented to the courts as aggravating factors when sentencing those convicted of existing offences."
*Bhattacharya, Shaoni. , ''New Scientist'', 22 April 2004.
*British Home Office. , July 2004.
*Cox, Simon and Vadon, Richard. , BBC Radio 4, retrieved 18 June 2006.
*{{cite journal|title=The SHAC Model: A Critical Assessment|pages=11–28|journal=]|author=CrimethInc. Ex-Workers Collective|author-link=CrimethInc. Ex-Workers Collective|issue=6|date=Fall 2006|url=http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/rollingthunder/shac.php|access-date=28 March 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161212223223/http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/rollingthunder/shac.php|archive-date=12 December 2016|url-status=dead}}
*Gibson, Ian. ''Hansard'', 19 March 2003.
*Robbins, John. , ''The Lawyer'', 16 August 2004.
*Lennard, Natasha. '']''. 12 December 2019
{{Refend}}


{{Atestingend}}
== External Links ==
{{Animal rights|state=collapsed|topics}}
{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty}}
*
]
** of cruelty shot inside HLS by SHAC members.
]
* *
]
*
]

]
=== SHAC-critical sites ===
]
* from the ]
*
* , ''New Scientist'', April 22, 2004
*
*
**

]
]
]

Latest revision as of 01:15, 29 November 2024

Organization "SHAC" redirects here. For other uses, see SHAC (disambiguation).

Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty
FocusAnimal-rights campaign to close Huntingdon Life Sciences. Opposition to animal testing.
Location
  • UK and US
OriginsEngland

Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) was an international animal rights campaign to close down Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS), Europe's largest contract animal-testing laboratory. HLS tests medical and non-medical substances on around 75,000 animals every year, from rats to primates. It has been the subject of several major leaks or undercover investigations by activists and reporters since 1989.

SHAC was started by three British animal rights activists—Greg Avery, Heather James, and Natasha Dellemagne—after video footage supposed to have been shot covertly inside HLS in 1997 by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) showed HLS staff shaking, punching, and shouting at beagles in their care. The footage was broadcast by Channel 4 in the UK, the employees were dismissed and prosecuted, and HLS's licence to perform animal experiments was revoked for six months. PETA stopped its protests against the company after HLS threatened it with legal action, and SHAC took over as a leaderless resistance.

The campaign used tactics ranging from non-violent protest to the alleged firebombing of houses owned by executives associated with HLS's clients and investors. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which monitors US domestic extremism, has described SHAC's modus operandi as "frankly terroristic tactics similar to those of anti-abortion extremists," and in 2005 an official with the FBI's counter-terrorism division referred to SHAC's activities in the United States as domestic terrorist threats.

In 2009 and 2010, 13 members of SHAC, including Avery, James, and Dellemagne, were jailed for between 15 months and eleven years on charges of conspiracy to blackmail or harm HLS and its suppliers.

Background

HLS tests household cleaners, pesticides, weedkillers, food additives, chemicals for use in industry, and drugs for use against Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and cancer. It kills around 75,000 animals every year, including rats, rabbits, pigs, dogs, and primates (marmosets and macaques).

The company has been the subject of several undercover investigations since 1989. Sarah Kite of the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) secured a job and filmed inside HLS in 1989. Zoe Broughton did the same for Channel 4 in 1996, as Michelle Rokke claimed to have done for PETA in 1997. Lucy Johnston for The Daily Express gained access in 2000. A diary kept by Kite, who worked undercover there for eight months, alleged that HLS workers routinely mishandled the animals, shouting at them, throwing them into their cages, and mocking them for having fits in response to toxicity tests. In 1997, Zoe Broughton came out with footage showing puppies being hit and shaken. A year later, Michelle Rokke allegedly obtained footage of the vivisection of a monkey in HLS in New Jersey, in which a technician expresses concern that the animal is inadequately anaesthetized. Between 2006 and 2008, an Animal Defenders International employee filmed undercover inside HLS after securing a position inside its primate toxicology unit in Cambridgeshire.

According to Mark Matfield of the Research Defence Society, a pro-animal testing lobby group in the UK, HLS lost a great deal of business after these investigations, primarily among the pharmaceutical industry. "There was an ingrained feeling among scientists and business people that this company had transgressed in a very serious way," he said.

Structure

SHAC UK

SHAC was founded in November 1999 by Greg Avery; his second wife, Natasha Avery (née Dellemagne); and his first wife, Heather Nicholson (née James). Avery and Nicholson had been involved in previous high-profile campaigns against facilities in the UK that bred animals for laboratories. In 1997, after a ten-month campaign, they caused the closure of Consort Kennels, which bred beagles for animal research. Later that year, they started Save the Hill Grove Cats against Hill Grove farm in Oxfordshire, which bred cats for laboratories. The farm closed after two years.

They would meet every three months to receive updates from colleagues in the United States and Europe. Sarah Whitehead, an experienced campaigner known in the group as "Mumsy", would lead younger members and carry out up to five attacks in a night, according to the judge.

Methods

Secondary and tertiary targeting

SHAC's modus operandi is known as secondary and tertiary targeting. Activists engage in direct action—ranging from lawful protests to intimidation, harassment, and violent attacks—not only against HLS, its employees, and its employees' families, but also against secondary and tertiary targets such as HLS's business partners, and their business partners, insurers, caterers, cleaners, children's nursery schools, and office suppliers. A New York yacht club, for example, was covered in red paint because members of the club worked for Carr Securities, which traded in HLS shares. The campaign drove down HLS's profits, suppressed its share price, and made it difficult to find business and financial partners.

In 2001, HLS managing director in the UK, Brian Cass, was beaten outside his home by three masked men – animal rights activist David Blenkinsop was sentenced to three years in prison for the attack – and HLS marketing director Andrew Gay was attacked on his doorstep with a chemical spray to his eyes that left him temporarily blinded.

Shareholders

On 21 December 2000, HLS was dropped from the New York Stock Exchange because its market capitalization had fallen below NYSE limits, and on 29 March 2001, HLS lost both of its market makers and its place on the London Stock Exchange. Shortly after this, HLS moved its headquarters to the United States, incorporating as Life Sciences Research (LSR), and secured a $15m loan from investment bank Stephens, Inc, its largest shareholder. In September 2005, after the firebombing of the homes of a Canadian brokerage employee and a British pharmaceutical executive, the New York Stock Exchange asked LSR to delay moving its listing from the OTC Bulletin Board to the main exchange. LSR has since transferred its listing to the NYSE Arca electronic exchange. HLS is no longer a publicly traded company after being bought by CEO Andrew Baker.

In June 2005, Vancouver-based brokerage Canaccord Capital announced that it had dropped a client, Phytopharm PLC, in response to the May 2005 Animal Liberation Front (ALF) firebombing of a car belonging to Canaccord executive Michael Kendall. The ALF stated on its website that activists placed an incendiary device under the car, which was in Kendall's garage at home when it caught fire during the night. Kendall and his family went into hiding. Phytopharm was targeted, as were those doing business with it, because it had business links with HLS.

In May 2006, an anonymous group said it would be writing to every one of GlaxoSmithKline's 170,000 small investors warning them to sell their shares. The letters began arriving at investors' home addresses on 7 May 2006, asking that shares be sold within 14 days, and that the group be informed of the sale by e-mail via a Hotmail address. The number of letters sent was smaller than claimed; the BBC said at least 50 shareholders received the warning. Writing in The Sunday Telegraph the following week, British Prime Minister Tony Blair expressed support for animal experimentation in the face of an "appalling ... campaign of intimidation."

Ties to the ALF

Kevin Kjonaas – who took charge of SHAC UK while the Averys and James were jailed for six months in 2002 – declared his support for the ALF, and Robin Webb, spokesman for the ALF in the UK, attended and addressed SHAC conferences in the United States.

In 2006 the ALF warned that it was targeting HLS suppliers, and that year firebombed a car belonging to the finance director of Canaccord Capital, a brokerage firm. Members of SHAC said the company had acted as brokers for Phytopharm, which had used HLS for contract testing.

The FBI linked SHAC with attacks claimed by the militant animal rights group, the Animal Liberation Brigade. They issued an arrest warrant for Daniel Andreas San Diego, who they described as being "involved with the Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty campaign", in connection with bomb attacks against two of HLS's clients in California. San Diego was added to the FBI Most Wanted Terrorists List in 2009.

Convictions and legislation

SHAC's campaign prompted the introduction of sections 145–149 of the British Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, which created new offences intended to protect animal-testing facilities, including prohibiting acts or threats intended to cause someone to terminate or not enter into a contract with such a facility. The first person to be convicted under the Act was Joseph Harris, a doctor of molecular biology, who attacked property owned by companies supplying materials to HLS; he received a three-year sentence. In February 2007, a number of SHAC supporters were charged with illegal street collecting without a licence. According to the Metropolitan Police, two stalls in London's Oxford Street collected over £80,000 a year. In March 2007, three activists were jailed under the Act for intimidating HLS suppliers; one supplier dropped its contract with HLS after being invaded by demonstrators wearing skull masks.

2006: SHAC 7 (U.S.)

Logo of the SHAC 7 Support Group

In March 2006, a federal jury in Trenton, New Jersey, found six members of SHAC guilty of using their website to incite attacks on those who did business with HLS. Originally, seven individuals (the SHAC 7) were charged: Kevin Kjonaas (also known as Kevin Jonas, former president of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA), Lauren Gazzola, Jacob Conroy, Joshua Harper, Andrew Stepanian, Darius Fullmer, and John McGee. McGee was later dropped from the case. They were charged with conspiracy to violate the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, in the first application of the 1992 statute. Jonas, Gazzola, Conroy, and Harper were charged with conspiracy to harass using a telecommunications device (discussing black faxes), while Jonas, Gazzola, Conroy, and SHAC USA were charged with stalking via the internet. The defence of the SHAC 7 rested largely on the 1969 case Brandenburg v. Ohio, in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that political speech is legal unless it can be shown that a defendant incited others to commit imminent unlawful acts of violence. During the trial, the defendants were prohibited from providing evidence of animal cruelty taking place at Huntingdon Life Sciences testing laboratories.

In 2011, NPR reported that Andrew Stepanian of the SHAC 7—since released—had been imprisoned in the highly restrictive Communication Management Unit of the U.S. federal prison system.

In 2019 Joaquin Phoenix produced 'The Animal People'; a documentary about the SHAC 7 defendants.

2007: Operation Achilles (UK)

On 1 May 2007, a series of raids—Operation Achilles—took place against SHAC in Europe, involving 700 police officers in England, Amsterdam, and Belgium. Thirty-two people were arrested, including Greg and Natasha Avery, and Heather Nicholson, who were charged with blackmail, along with nine others. Prosecutors told jurors that a 2007 meeting between the defendants had been bugged by police, and revealed that SHAC supported illegal acts that were traced to attacks on people across Great Britain. The prosecution also alleged there was evidence of direct email links between SHAC, the Animal Liberation Front, and Animal Rights Militia. Der Spiegel wrote that as a result of the police operation the number of attacks on HLS and associated businesses declined drastically, although the day after the convictions new posts on SHAC's website indicated that the campaign would continue.

See also

References

  1. ^ "A controversial laboratory", BBC News, 18 January 2001.
  2. "New bill clamps down on animal activist activity" Archived 12 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine, Drug Researcher, 17 November 2006.
  3. ^ "SPLCenter.org: From Push to Shove". 19 October 2003. Archived from the original on 19 October 2003. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  4. Townsend, Mark. "Exposed: secrets of the animal organ lab", The Observer, 20 April 2003.
  5. ^ "The First Investigation" Archived 27 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine; "It's a Dog's Life" Archived 27 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine (Zoe Broughton for Channel Four in 1996); "HLS busted again" Archived 27 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine (Michelle Rokke for PETA in 1997); and Johnstone, Lucy and Calvert, Jonathan. "Terrible despair of animals cut up in name of research" Archived 27 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine (Lucy Johnston for The Daily Express in 2000).
  6. Alleyne, Richard. "Terror tactics that brought a company to its knees", The Daily Telegraph, 19 January 2001.
  7. ^ Doward, Jamie and Townsend, Mark. "Beauty and the beasts", The Observer, 1 August 2004.
  8. Lewis, John E. "Statement of John Lewis", US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, 26 October 2005, accessed 17 January 2011.
  9. ^ Evers, Marco. "Resisting the Animal Avengers", Part 1, Part 2, Der Spiegel, 19 November 2007.
  10. ^ Weaver, Matthew (25 October 2010). "Animal rights activists jailed for terrorising suppliers to Huntingdon Life Sciences". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 17 September 2013.
  11. "From push to shove" Archived 4 February 2005 at the Wayback Machine Southern Poverty Law Group Intelligence Report, Fall 2002.
  12. "Huntingdon Life Sciences Investigation", Animal Defenders International, 15 July 2009, accessed 17 January 2011.
  13. Rudacille, Deborah. The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The Conflict between Animal Research and Animal Protection. University of California Press, 2001, p. 286.
  14. Jonas, Kevin (2004). "Chapter: Bricks and Bullhorns". Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?: Reflections on the Liberation of Animals. By Best, Steven; Nocella, Anthony J. Lantern Books. p. 271. ISBN 978-1-59056-054-9. Today, SHAC is the intelligent and strategic continuation of such a rounded attack, effectively coupling both legal and illegal tactics ... The "SHAC campaign" has come to mean any endeavor aimed at contributing to the legal SHAC efforts, whether it be legal or not. In various legal proceedings we have distinguished SHAC the incorporated group as a news/information clearing house, and the "SHAC campaign" as all other protest activities.
  15. "Police bugged animal rights group". BBC News. 7 October 2008. Archived from the original on 10 October 2008.
  16. "Childcare group warned of 'hell'", BBC News, 29 September 2005.
  17. Lewis, John E. "Statement of John Lewis" Archived 1 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine, U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works, 26 October 2005, accessed 17 January 2011.
  18. "Money talks", The Guardian, 1 June 2006.
  19. "Huntingdon delays listing after attacks", The Guardian, 8 September 2005.
  20. "LSR goes private in Lion Holdings takeover", Outsourcing, pharma.com, 1 December 2009.
  21. Won, Shirley, and Zehr, Leonard. "When threats turn to firebombs, Canaccord cuts loose on client", The Globe and Mail, 24 June 2005.
  22. "Animal rights activists tell drug firm's small investors to sell up or else", The Guardian, 9 May 2006.
  23. Glaxo wins injunction over threat, 9 May 2006.
  24. "Tony Blair: Time to act against animal rights protesters". The Daily Telegraph. 13 May 2006. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  25. Laville, Sandra and Campbell, Duncan. "Animal rights extremists in arson spree", The Guardian, 25 June 2006.
  26. Doyle, Leonard. Animal rights activist added to FBI's most wanted terrorist list, The Telegraph, 24 April 2009.
  27. "FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists List: Daniel Andreas San Diego". FBI. 21 April 2009. Retrieved 18 January 2011.
  28. Tempest, Matthew. "Crackdown on animal rights extremists", The Guardian, 31 January 2005
  29. "Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill", House of Commons, 2005.
  30. "Animal rights protester is jailed", BBC News, 20 September 2006.
  31. Smit, Martina. "21 'illegally' collected for animal rights terror", thisislocallondon.co.uk, 22 February 2007.
  32. "Three 'violent' activists jailed", BBC News, 6 March 2007.
  33. Kocieniewski, David. "Six Animal Rights Advocates Are Convicted of Terrorism", The New York Times, 3 March 2006.
  34. "Animal Rights Activists Get Prison in Web Threat Case". Southern Poverty Law Center.
  35. "ANARCHISM, FEATURED “Sometimes We Had a Brick”, Portland Radicle, July 2013.
  36. "America's #1 Threat", Mother Jones, January/February 2006.
  37. Lennard, Natasha (30 January 2022). "Prosecutors Silence Evidence of Cruel Factory Farm Practices in Animal Rights Cases". The Intercept. Retrieved 2 February 2022.
  38. DATA & GRAPHICS: Population Of The Communications Management Units, Margot Williams and Alyson Hurt, NPR, 3 March 2011; retrieved 4 March 2011.
  39. "The Animal People". FINNGATE. Retrieved 9 May 2021.
  40. "Animal rights activists involved in bid to shut lab among 30 arrested in raids", The Guardian, 2 May 2007.
  41. "Five deny animal rights blackmail ", BBC News, 6 October 2008.
  42. "Animal activists still continuing campaign of threats and intimidation", The Daily Telegraph, 24 December 2008.

Further reading

External links
Books and articles
Animal testing
Main articles
Testing on
Issues
Controversial
experiments
Companies
Groups and
campaigns
Writers and
activists
Legislation
Animal rights
Topics (overviews, concepts, issues, cases)
Overviews
Concepts
Issues
Animal agriculture
Animal testing
Animal welfare
Fishing
Wild animals
Other
Cases
Methodologies
Observances
Advocates (academics, writers, activists)
Academics
and writers
Contemporary
Historical
Activists
Contemporary
Historical
Movement (groups, parties)
Groups
Contemporary
Historical
Parties
Activism
Media (books, films, periodicals, albums)
Books
Films
Periodicals
Journals
Magazines
Albums
Fairs and exhibitions
Categories: