| Revision as of 02:22, 26 April 2007 editAntandrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators111,293 editsm Reverted edits by 68.215.10.20 (talk) to last version by Sarah← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:23, 26 April 2007 edit undoPureRED (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers7,324 edits →Please don't use personal attack on the user pages of others: RESOLVED - MisunderstandingNext edit → | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
| :You can change build to erected if you want but don't re-add ambiguous links and internal links that will never ever work. And please don't use canned "welcome to Misplaced Pages" warnings on established editors, administrators, no less. It's offensive. ''']''' 01:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | :You can change build to erected if you want but don't re-add ambiguous links and internal links that will never ever work. And please don't use canned "welcome to Misplaced Pages" warnings on established editors, administrators, no less. It's offensive. ''']''' 01:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::LOL You're very passive-aggressive, aren't you. I'd suggest you rethink the way you interact with other editors "but for the sake of being polite, I won't." ''']''' 01:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | ::LOL You're very passive-aggressive, aren't you. I'd suggest you rethink the way you interact with other editors "but for the sake of being polite, I won't." ''']''' 01:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Please don't use personal attack on the user pages of others== | |||
| The comment that you left at ] has been reverted because it is a breach of ] - please don't comment in this way on the user pages of others!--] <sup>]</sup> 01:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * Yes it is still considered a personal attack if you KNOW the person.--] <sup>]</sup> 01:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:23, 26 April 2007
|
You're doing a good job reverting vandalism. Thanks for your help and please keep it up! PeaceNT 07:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Your VandalProof Application
Dear PureRED,
Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel Bryant 08:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Clit wank
Hi there; while this article may well deserve deletion ,the reason that you have given is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. The accepted reasons are listed in WP:CSD. This article is probably best dealt with by using {{prod}}. I am aware of the potential for humour contained in this suggestion.--Anthony.bradbury 20:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Qualities
Dear PureRED,
It has come to my attention that you and I both have many of the same characteristics and qualities. I must wonder as to whether we have possibly spoken before? After all, having things in common is only a precursor to being familiar with someone. Atrophicwhisper
RFC Mike Jones
I've started a Request for Comment on Mike Jones (rapper). Since you added or reverted a edit pertaining to the subject matter of the RfC, you may be interested in contributing your opinion/statement at Talk:Mike_Jones_(rapper)#Request_for_Comment --Ted 22:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
The Condemned
It's not vandalism. What is there is taken from a magazine. That's copyright violation and not allowed by Misplaced Pages. Since you're so free to call me a vandal, I'll be free to tell an admin right now about the copyvio. --69.22.254.111 00:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- As a courtesy, I'm letting you know I've notified the admins at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. And I have no idea what you would insert the copyvio tag and then remove it --69.22.254.111 00:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, and accusing me of vandalism goes contrary to Assume Good Faith. That was wrong and unlike my action it was personal. Think about that.-- 69.22.254.111 01:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining. However, blaming it on your software is disappointing. We program our software, or we choose to use a particular software. Please take responsibility for your choosing to allow your software to make personal attack when no one attacked you. --69.22.254.111 01:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: Brunswick
What areyou talking about? I reverted edits that included the insertion of a vanity publication and a heap of internal links that will simply never work, such as "artist Simon Perry" and "Counihan Gallery in Brunswick". Sarah 01:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- You can change build to erected if you want but don't re-add ambiguous links and internal links that will never ever work. And please don't use canned "welcome to Misplaced Pages" warnings on established editors, administrators, no less. It's offensive. Sarah 01:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- LOL You're very passive-aggressive, aren't you. I'd suggest you rethink the way you interact with other editors "but for the sake of being polite, I won't." Sarah 01:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)