Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Romania: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:54, 5 September 2023 editXx236 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,481 edits →Lake or Lacul?: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:42, 1 December 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,335 edits →Good article reassessment for Cluj-Napoca: new sectionTag: New topic 
(46 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
⚫ {{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Romania}}
⚫ }}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 70K |maxarchivesize = 70K
|counter = 6 |counter = 8
|minthreadsleft = 10 |minthreadsleft = 10
|algo = old(60d) |algo = old(60d)
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Romania/Archive %(counter)d |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Romania/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
⚫ {{WikiProject Romania}}
{{Shortcut|WT:RO|WT:Romania|WT:ROMANIA}} {{Shortcut|WT:RO|WT:Romania|WT:ROMANIA}}
{{Search prefixes {{Search prefixes
Line 18: Line 20:
| Misplaced Pages:Romanian Wikipedians' notice board | Misplaced Pages:Romanian Wikipedians' notice board
| Misplaced Pages talk:Romanian Wikipedians' notice board | Misplaced Pages talk:Romanian Wikipedians' notice board
}}{{tmbox|image=]|text=Merged ] archives: {{archive list|root=Misplaced Pages:Romanian Wikipedians' notice board/|nobr=yes}}. Noticeboard talk archives: {{archive list|root=Misplaced Pages talk:Romanian Wikipedians' notice board/|nobr=yes}}.<br>WikiProject talk page archives: {{archive list}}.}} }}{{tmbox|image=]|text=Merged ] archives: {{archive list|root=Misplaced Pages:Romanian Wikipedians' notice board|nobr=yes}}. Noticeboard talk archives: {{archive list|root=Misplaced Pages talk:Romanian Wikipedians' notice board|nobr=yes}}.<br>WikiProject talk page archives: {{archive list}}.}}
{{Archive box|auto=yes}} {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 5
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Romania/Archive %(counter)d
⚫ }}

== Balkan Latinity WikiProject ==


⚫ == Requested move at ] ==
Hello, I've been thinking for a while of an idea for a new and certainly needed WikiProject. The ]/Vlachs, ]/Meglenites and ]/Ćiribirci are poorly known peoples in the Balkans, the only ones that are Romance-speaking apart of the Romanians. Tagging pages related to these with WikiProject templates can turn problematic, see this talk page for example , saturated with 7 different templates. I was thus thinking that giving them their own WikiProject could increase organization on Misplaced Pages about info on these peoples and increase their representation in the project, perhaps even attracting members of these groups into working at Misplaced Pages. The project could be split into three task forces for each of the three.
⚫ ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 19:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


⚫ == Good article reassessment for ] ==
If you're interested, please ping me here or message me on my talk page. Expressing your interest in the existence of such a project is enough, you will not be compromised or pressured into working in a topic area you might lose interest to soon. After (if) I recruit enough support, I will start a formal proposal and ping you there. Regards, ] ] ] 20:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
⚫ ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
:@]I'm still brand new at attempting to edit anything here, but I'm happy to help if I can. I can help with cleaning up some of the Greek language pages, so they're to the standard you'd expect to see on Misplaced Pages and not "my papou forgot what century it was & is ranting at the wall" ] (]) 11:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] <sub> '']''</sub> 17:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
::{{u|Vialitsa}}, any help is welcome. For now, you can support this project by voting for its creation here . Once it is created it will be easier to give more aims and directions to members of the project. ] ] ] 11:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
:::Oh perfect, I'm getting up to speed with the contributor standards & how to navigate! ] (]) 12:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)


== Standarization of ș vs s , ț vs t etc. ==
==Thought on categories Eastern Orthodoxy /Far-right/ Iron guard==
Currently is treated as a subset of . This maybe somehow confusing when dealing with the odd Catholic member of the Iron Guard... I would have maybe created as an intersection of two distinct sets: and . It's not that big a deal... just a thought... ] (]) 08:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
:Could be a bit excessive and specific in my opinion. I think a better option could be to also include a Catholic and far-right politics category if there is any. ] ] ] 16:27, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
::It might be too specific, granted... On the other hand the the category would have a main article (]) and, potentially, on the long term, dozens of articles given the huge number of clergymen to have been active in the organization. As wikipedia taxonomy stands now, any article is automatically in a subset of including the one about the ] ]. ] (]) 17:06, 22 September 2022 (UTC)


I propose we standardize the use of ș or s on english wikipedia.
⚫ == Requested move at ] ==
⚫ ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.] (]) 00:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


For example ] VS ] (these 2 are brothers). Both are the english versions of the article, and yet they use different versions of ș.
== ] ==
I believe, although i'd prefer using "ș", we should use "s" considering that "ș" doesnt exist in the english alphabet. Either that, or use "sh". However doing that would also start the argument of using "uh" for "ă".
I can understand standardizing it to ș too, since that is usually whats on the person's birth certificate, in Valery's and Andrei's case, even though "ș" doesnt exist in English. Although this is about the use of "ș" vs "s", realistically there proabably are instances of using a instead of ă or â, or the opposite, and most definently of t instead of ț, or vice versa. ] (]) 10:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


== ] ==
I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 18:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (])! Think of it as a ] but only for articles and media on developing countries.
== Hello, I would like to join the Project Romania ==
Hello, I would like to join the project, how do I join? I can contribute a lot to history as I'm a student looking to become a historian. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:36, 16 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Competitors may submit ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s, and ] and ] entries from/on developing countries to gain points and climb the leaderboard. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.
== Radu Dan Constantinescu ==


Romania is listed as a developing country for the purposes of this contest and articles related to it are eligible to be submitted for points, so I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content!
] was created for pay. It seems like the topic is non-notable, but I think it would be better if someone could check local sources, including offline work and clean-up it a bit. Thank you. ] (]) 23:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


Append your name to the ] today!
==Survey at ]==


Best wishes, ] (<small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small>) 07:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
] There is a survey at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 06:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)


== MfD nomination at ] ==
== FAR for Regulamentul Organic ==


"Moldovan" userboxes have been nominated for deletion. ISO 639 code for Moldovan, mo, has been deprecated. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. ] (]) 01:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
] has nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 16:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Buidhe@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Buidhe/messages&oldid=1148835610 -->


⚫ == Requested move at ] ==
== Project-independent quality assessments ==
⚫ ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] 21:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
Quality assessments by Misplaced Pages editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at ], but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent ] was approved and has been implemented to add a {{para|class}} parameter to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 07:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)


== Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon ==
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.


<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{tl|WPBannerMeta}} a new {{para|QUALITY_CRITERIA|custom}} parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. ] (]) 13:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
]
Hello WikiProject Romania:


''']''' is holding a ''' month-long ]'''!<br /><br />
⚫ == Good article reassessment for ] ==
Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme '''Around the World in 31 Days'''! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least '''31 countries''' (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
⚫ ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] <sub> '']''</sub> 21:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


We hope to see you there!
⚫ == Requested move at ] ==
⚫ ] (]) 12:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)</div>
⚫ ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran ] 14:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
== Lake or Lacul? ==
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 21:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
⚫ Do we replace Lacul with Lake? ] (]) 08:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:42, 1 December 2024

This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconRomania
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania
To-do list:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Shortcuts
SearchCombined search for Romania noticeboard and WikiProject archives Discussion of Romania-related topics has been split between this page and WP:RWNB plus its talk page. This box searches the archives of all those pages.

Search
Merged noticeboard archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. Noticeboard talk archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.
WikiProject talk page archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.

Requested move at Talk:Dobrujan Tatar dialect#Requested move 14 February 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dobrujan Tatar dialect#Requested move 14 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. asilvering (talk) 19:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Michael the Brave

Michael the Brave has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Golubac Fortress

Golubac Fortress has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 17:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Standarization of ș vs s , ț vs t etc.

I propose we standardize the use of ș or s on english wikipedia. 

For example Valery Oisteanu VS Andrei Oișteanu  (these 2 are brothers). Both are the english versions of the article, and yet they use different versions of ș.
  I believe, although i'd prefer using "ș", we should use "s" considering that "ș" doesnt exist in the english alphabet. Either that, or use "sh". However doing that would also start the argument of using "uh" for "ă".
  I can understand standardizing it to ș too, since that is usually whats on the person's birth certificate, in Valery's and Andrei's case, even though "ș" doesnt exist in English. Although this is about the use of "ș" vs "s", realistically there proabably are instances of using a instead of ă or â, or the opposite, and most definently of t instead of ț, or vice versa. John the man the plan on the train track (talk) 10:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Developing Countries WikiContest

Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries.

Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and climb the leaderboard. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.

Romania is listed as a developing country for the purposes of this contest and articles related to it are eligible to be submitted for points, so I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content!

Append your name to the DCWC signup page today!

Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (/my edits) 07:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

MfD nomination at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Moldovan userbox templates

"Moldovan" userboxes have been nominated for deletion. ISO 639 code for Moldovan, mo, has been deprecated. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Moldovan userbox templates. Lucjim (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Dodola and Perperuna#Requested move 22 August 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dodola and Perperuna#Requested move 22 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 21:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Liviu Librescu

Liviu Librescu has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon

Hello WikiProject Romania:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 12:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for History of the flags of Romania

History of the flags of Romania has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Cluj-Napoca

Cluj-Napoca has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Categories: