| Revision as of 14:41, 29 February 2016 editCyberbot II (talk | contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers469,511 edits Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 17:54, 2 December 2024 edit undoBonewah (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,108 edits Reverted 1 edit by 2600:6C5D:68F0:86E0:D8DB:9161:5241:8ADC (talk): Unrelated to subjectTags: Twinkle Undo |
| (224 intermediate revisions by 88 users not shown) |
| Line 20: |
Line 20: |
|
|topic=Politics and government |
|
|topic=Politics and government |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|blp=yes|class=C|listas=Palin, Sarah|1= |
|
{{WikiProjectBanners|blp=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=C|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=high|listas=Palin, Sarah}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Alaska|class=C|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Alaska|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Beauty Pageants|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Beauty Pageants|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid|American=yes|American-importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States|class=C|importance=low|USgovernors=yes|USgovernors-importance=low|USPE=Yes|USPE-importance=high|ID=Yes|ID-importance=low|listas=Palin, Sarah}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|AZ=yes|AZ-importance=low|USgovernors=yes|USgovernors-importance=low|USPE=Yes|USPE-importance=high|ID=Yes|ID-importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|class=C|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women writers|class=C|importance=|auto=inherit}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
| Line 99: |
Line 99: |
|
| org14='']'' |
|
| org14='']'' |
|
| author14=Farhad Manjool |
|
| author14=Farhad Manjool |
|
| title15= Updating a Reference Site on the Fly |
|
| title15=Updating a Reference Site on the Fly |
|
| author15= Noam Cohen |
|
| author15=Noam Cohen |
|
| date15= November 9, 2008 |
|
| date15=November 9, 2008 |
|
| url15= http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/technology/internet/10link.html |
|
| url15=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/technology/internet/10link.html |
|
| org15= '']'' |
|
| org15='']'' |
|
|author16=(none) |
|
| author16=(none) |
|
|date16=August 17, 2009 |
|
| date16=August 17, 2009 |
|
|url16=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most-viewed-Misplaced Pages-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html |
|
| url16=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most-viewed-Misplaced Pages-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html |
|
|title16=The 50 most-viewed Misplaced Pages articles in 2009 and 2008 |
|
| title16=The 50 most-viewed Misplaced Pages articles in 2009 and 2008 |
|
|org16='']'' |
|
| org16='']'' |
|
|
| author17=Andy Miller |
|
|
| title17=Welcome to Anchorpedia |
|
|
| org17='']'' |
|
|
| url17=https://www.anchoragepress.com/news/welcome-to-anchorpedia/article_ccfec22c-935e-55b7-b655-22d66ffdca3a.html |
|
|
| date17=October 10, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|author18 = Rhiannon Ruff |
|
|
|title18 = Why Misplaced Pages can be a PR problem for political campaigns |
|
|
|date18 = March 6, 2024 |
|
|
|org18 = PR Daily |
|
|
|url18 = https://www.prdaily.com/why-wikipedia-can-be-a-pr-problem-for-political-campaigns/ |
|
|
|lang18 = |
|
|
|quote18 = |
|
|
|archiveurl18 = |
|
|
|archivedate18 = <!-- do not wikilink --> |
|
|
|accessdate18 = March 6, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{Annual report|]}} |
|
<!-- please do not remove this tag --> |
|
<!-- please do not remove this tag --> |
|
{{pp-move-indef}} |
|
{{pp-move-indef}} |
|
<!--{{Notice|1=This talk page is semi-protected due the excessive vandalism as well as ]. If you want to request an edit on Palin's page click ] instead.}}--> |
|
<!--{{Notice|1=This talk page is semi-protected due the excessive vandalism as well as ]. If you want to request an edit on Palin's page click ] instead.}}--> |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Auto archiving notice|age=30 |
|
|
|index=./Archive index |
|
|
|bot=MiszaBot}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
| Line 131: |
Line 146: |
|
|indexhere=yes}} |
|
|indexhere=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== What is going on? == |
|
== RSS is, by definition, reliable == |
|
|
|
|
I came on here to figure out where she was actually from, and was shocked by this article. I can't figure out for the life of me, why it is so extensive. This person's influence is limited, and will probably be nearly forgotten in a decade or two. Can we whittle it down to what is actually relevant in a encyclopedic historical context? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
:But on the other hand she has one of the largest amounts of archived talk pages of any WP articles - and the article has often seemed to be (and remain) a bit, er, sanitized by her fans. Did you get the clue? ;) ] (]) 14:25, 7 April 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== New NEWS today, for future editing == |
|
|
|
|
|
Obvious comparisons, contrasts and competition begins. |
|
|
Headline-1: '''The first shot: Clinton vs. Palin''' |
|
|
* http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/the-first-shot-clinton-vs.-palin/article/2559261 |
|
|
QUOTE: "Two days after Sarah Palin said she is considering a bid and held up a “Ready for Hillary” car magnet during her weekend address at an Iowa conservatives convention, the group took the bait and fired back, accusing Palin of signaling the beginning of a GOP anti-Clinton crusade." -- ] (]) 15:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC) -- PS: FYI for future editing. |
|
|
|
|
|
==The 'See also' section== |
|
|
I'll be adding the 'See also' section, with one bullet item. Guidelines are that main items in the body of the article do not have a 'See also' entry. With this in mind, when her 2016 run for the presidency is dominant the 'See also' entry about her positioning can be removed. Feel free to add other 'See also' references to other pertinent WP pages not linked in the body of the article. -- ] (]) 16:17, 27 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:Once again, all I see is an offhand remark to a reporter being deemed a "news story", and hence being used to justify "evidence" of a candidacy where no other evidence exists. Hey, everyone, I declare myself to be a candidate for the ] nomination for ]. So, if I con a "reliable source" into publishing such a "fact", does that mean that I'm allowed to bludgeon Misplaced Pages with it and ignore all evidence to the contrary, or do those rules not apply because I'm not Sarah Palin?]/]/] 03:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:: I wonder how desperate some editors are going to be to avoid acknowledging the existence of that, to the point of making it appear that WashPo is all of a sudden not a reliable source because they ran a piece which isn't complimentary. Particularly relevant to the point I've been making are the following: "Still others expressed concern that the GOP is damaging its own prospects by treating Palin as though she is doing more than promoting herself and her various ventures" and "As for her presidential ambitions, Palin said she was merely answering a question lodged by a 'pesty reporter while I was promoting my Sportsman Channel show'".]/]/] 07:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Whatever Sarah Palin decides, she will be a positive factor in keeping the Conservative vote in the Republican Party. -- ] (]) 04:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:Talk pages are not a blog. ] (]) 15:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Health care section == |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm wondering what's going on with the health care section. See for one of at least 2 reverts in this section. The two "citation needed" tags just don't make sense to me. Are people really claiming that the "Affordable Healthcare act .." is not what Palin is referring to in the quote now linked to from Politico? Are they claiming that Palin isn't in favor of defunding Obamacare? In any case it's all in the reference that has been reverted. |
|
|
|
|
|
]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 13:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The problem with the "quote" from Politico is that it is highly selective about which words of Palin it takes from her response. If you read the text of what she really said, it shows how dubious the Politico selection is. I don't think anyone is saying Politico isn't a reliable source, but the way she is so selectively quoted in the section of the article under discussion renders it useless for an encyclopedic article. Thanks. ] (]) 14:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::The full text of the interview is . I see what you mean in that the topic is not just healthcare, but the rhetoric quoted seems par for the course. Perhaps you can rewrite the paragraph about her opposition to healthcare. Right now the paragraph just does not make sense. ]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 15:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
:::What about it do you feel is unclear? ] (]) 16:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
I thought I was clear above. Copying the section with comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Health care''' |
|
|
* Palin opposed the ], saying it would lead to rationing of health care by a bureaucracy, which she described using the term "]s". |
|
|
|
|
|
This legislation is the ], as modified by the ].{{citation needed|date=September 2014}}<!-- WP:RS needed; removed link to WP:SPS (Twitter, FB, WP)--> (Is this sentence needed? What does the citation needed refer to?) |
|
|
|
|
|
Palin characterizes the act as an "unfunded mandate" and supports defunding it,{{citation needed|date=September 2014}}<!-- WP:RS needed; removed link to WP:SPS (Twitter, FB, WP)--> as well as repealing portions of the act. REF (Does anybody doubt that this is true? References are only needed where there is a reasonable doubt. What isn't covered in the ref given?) |
|
|
|
|
|
]<sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 21:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've quoted Sarah word-for-word as published in a reliable source, yet you've chosen to make still another revert. The Alaska Republican party chose to make an endorsement of a more conservative candidate than Sarah in the current election, and you think that's not worthy of mention? Are you serious? Really? ] (]) 20:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
:Im perfectly OK with removing the line "This legislation is the ], as modified by the ]" and possibly adding a reference to its common name (obamacare) in the previous line. I am also OK with removing the CN tag in the next sentence. ] (]) 14:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:Yes i am. The fact that the republican party endorsed someone else is of little note. The text "However, after he was convicted of seven felonies, a week before election day" is far from neutral. Neither is the sentence before that about what the Washington Post thinks Palin 'intended'. Speculation and opinion. Yet again, ] requires that "The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." I.E. you. ] (]) 20:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
He was convicted of seven felonies that prior week. Here's the first sentence in the WP article section about him. |
|
|
<blockquote>Guilty verdict and repercussions |
|
|
On October 27, 2008, Stevens was found guilty of all seven counts of making false statements. Stevens was only the fifth sitting senator to be convicted by a jury in U.S. history,</blockquote> |
|
|
The endorsement of the AK Republican party in a congressional election is "of little note?" |
|
|
McCain also asked him to step down, as did McConnell, other Senators... What can you be thinking about? ] (]) 23:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:Interesting that you are so fixated on Steven's conviction, and not the fact that all the convictions were vacated due to 'gross prosecutorial misconduct'. Why the insistence on mentioning one and not the other? Lets leave the details of Ted Stevens' legal troubles to the the ] article. As for the endorsement or non-endorsement of the AK republican party, i stand by my statement, its of little note, just like any endorsements or non-endorsements for any of the other offices she has run for or held. A quick search of this article reveals no mention of the AK republican party's endorsement (or anyone else's endorsement) when she ran for city counsel, mayor, governor or vice president. I dont see why this one is any different. ] (]) 13:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2022 == |
|
==BLP noticeboard== |
|
|
<s>Section = 109 BLP articles labelled "Climate Change Deniers" all at once.</s> This article was placed in a "climate change deniers" category. After discussion on and the category was deleted. ] (]) 17:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Edit semi-protected|Sarah Palin|answered=yes}} |
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
Update the election results involving Sarah Palin in the 2022 Midterm Election. ] (]) 16:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 17:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== The first tea party convention was not in 2010 == |
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first teaparty convention was held at Faneuil Hall Boston on December 16, 2007. What Sarah Palin attended was some GOP PAC The tea party the original one never did and still doesn’t endorse candidates it’s a movement not a political party and not a PAC and it is not the GOP when are people going to understand this? The 2010 event she attended was decidedly Republican. I formed the first tea party coalition in New Hampshire in 2007 so I should know. You can check out our website for references. nhteapartycoalition.org ] (]) 01:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
|
I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110605090016/http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/alaska/mccain_leads_by_15_in_alaska to http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/alaska/mccain_leads_by_15_in_alaska |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Do you mean ? Because while that may have been a precursor to the Tea Party movement, it's not the Tea Party movement. It was Ron Paul's 2008 presidential campaign. – ] (]) 02:18, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== 2017 Defamation Lawsuit == |
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second circuit has ordered a new trial regarding the 2017 defamation lawsuit. |
|
Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 14:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
|
] (]) 18:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC) |
I've quoted Sarah word-for-word as published in a reliable source, yet you've chosen to make still another revert. The Alaska Republican party chose to make an endorsement of a more conservative candidate than Sarah in the current election, and you think that's not worthy of mention? Are you serious? Really? Activist (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
He was convicted of seven felonies that prior week. Here's the first sentence in the WP article section about him.
The endorsement of the AK Republican party in a congressional election is "of little note?"
McCain also asked him to step down, as did McConnell, other Senators... What can you be thinking about? Activist (talk) 23:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
The first teaparty convention was held at Faneuil Hall Boston on December 16, 2007. What Sarah Palin attended was some GOP PAC The tea party the original one never did and still doesn’t endorse candidates it’s a movement not a political party and not a PAC and it is not the GOP when are people going to understand this? The 2010 event she attended was decidedly Republican. I formed the first tea party coalition in New Hampshire in 2007 so I should know. You can check out our website for references. nhteapartycoalition.org 2601:18D:8780:C9F0:8D49:CD4F:B493:B7E1 (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
view · edit Frequently asked questions
.jpg){kind=small}
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)