Misplaced Pages

Damiano Defence: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:27, 24 July 2017 editBanedon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,648 edits Giving some ideas behind the opening in the lede← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:44, 3 December 2024 edit undoIhardlythinkso (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers75,120 edits Undid revision 1260862799 by CakeEater17928 (talk) the annotations are implied from the ref'd sourceTag: Undo 
(33 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
| |
| |

|rd|nd|bd|qd|kd|bd|nd|rd |rd|nd|bd|qd|kd|bd|nd|rd
|pd|pd|pd|pd| | |pd|pd |pd|pd|pd|pd| | |pd|pd
Line 28: Line 27:
#] ] #] ]


The defence is one of the oldest chess openings, with games dating back to the 16th century. It is a weak opening, and leads to either a forced win or a large advantage for White after 3. Nxe5. Even if White does not go for this continuation, simple development leads to an advantage since 2...f6 weakened Black's kingside as well as took away the best square for the knight on g8. The defence is one of the oldest chess openings, with games dating back to the 16th century. It is a weak opening that gives a large advantage for White after 3.Nxe5. Even if White does not go for this continuation, simple {{chessgloss|development}} leads to an advantage since 2...f6 prevents the g8-knight from developing to f6 and weakens Black's {{chessgloss|kingside}}.


The ] code for the Damiano Defence is C40 (]). The '']'' code for the Damiano Defence is C40 (]).
{{chess notation|pos=toc}} {{AN chess|pos=toc}}


==3.d4 and 3.Bc4== ==3.d4 and 3.Bc4==
Black's 2...f6? is a weak move that exposes Black's ], weakens Black's ] and takes away his ] best square. The moves 3.d4 and 3.Bc4 are strong replies; ] wrote (substituting algebraic notation for his ]), "Simple and potent is 3.Bc4 d6 4.d4 Nc6 5.c3, after which Black chokes to death."<ref>], ''Chess Openings: Theory and Practice'', Simon and Schuster, 1964, p. 227 n. 31.</ref> Black's 2...f6{{chesspunc|?}} is a weak move that exposes Black's ], weakens their kingside and prevents Black from developing their ] to f6. The moves 3.d4 and 3.Bc4 are strong replies; ] wrote (substituting algebraic notation for his ]), "Simple and potent is 3.Bc4 d6 4.d4 Nc6 5.c3, after which Black chokes to death."<ref>], ''Chess Openings: Theory and Practice'', Simon and Schuster, 1964, p. 227 n. 31.</ref>


==3.Nxe5!== ==3.Nxe5!==
Line 40: Line 39:
| tright | tright
| |

|rd|nd|bd|qd| |bd|nd|rd |rd|nd|bd|qd| |bd|nd|rd
|pd|pd|pd| | | |pd| |pd|pd|pd| | | |pd|
Line 49: Line 47:
|pl|pl|pl|pl| |pl|pl| |pl|pl|pl|pl| |pl|pl|
|rl|nl|bl| |kl| | |rl |rl|nl|bl| |kl| | |rl
|Position after 8...h5. |Position after 8...h5
}} }}
Most forceful, however, is the knight ] 3.Nxe5!<ref>''Understanding the Chess Openings'', Sam Collins, 2005, p. 28.</ref> Taking the knight with 3...fxe5? exposes Black to a deadly attack after 4.Qh5+ Ke7 (4...g6 loses to 5.Qxe5+, ]ing king and ]) 5.Qxe5+ Kf7 6.Bc4+ d5! (6...Kg6?? 7.Qf5+ is devastating and leads to mate shortly after) 7.Bxd5+ Kg6 8.h4 (8.d4? Bd6!) h5 (diagram; 8...h6 is similar, except Black can't play 9...Bxb7 because of 10. Qf5#) 9.Bxb7! Bd6 (9...Bxb7 10.Qf5+ Kh6 11.d4+ g5 12.Qf7! mates quickly) 10.Qa5!, when Black's best is 10...Nc6 11.Bxc6 Rb8, and now White will be ahead by several pawns. ] notes that Black's opening is thus sometimes described as "the five pawns ]".<ref name="Pandolfinip.92">], ''Chess Openings: Traps and Zaps'', Simon & Schuster, 1989, p. 92. {{ISBN|0-671-65690-2}}.</ref> Alternatively, White can continue developing his ], remaining four pawns up. In either case, White has a clearly winning position. The most forceful move is the knight ] 3.Nxe5{{chesspunc|!}}<ref>''Understanding the Chess Openings'', Sam Collins, 2005, p. 28.</ref> Taking the knight with 3...fxe5? exposes Black to a deadly attack after 4.Qh5+ Ke7 (4...g6 loses to 5.Qxe5+, ]ing king and ], leaving Black down ], though other options are worse) 5.Qxe5+ Kf7 6.Bc4+ d5! (6...Kg6{{chesspunc|??}} 7.Qf5+ is devastating and leads to ] shortly after) 7.Bxd5+ Kg6 8.h4 (8.d4? Bd6!) 8...h5 (see diagram; 8...h6 is similar, except Black cannot play 9...Bxb7 because of 10.Qf5{{chessAN|#}}) 9.Bxb7! Bd6 (9...Bxb7 10.Qf5+ Kh6 11.d4+ g5 12.Qf7! mates quickly) 10.Qa5!, when Black's best is 10...Nc6 11.Bxc6 Rb8, and now White can play 12.Qxa7 with five extra pawns. ] notes that Black's opening is thus sometimes described as "the five pawns {{chessgloss|gambit}}".<ref name="Pandolfinip.92">], ''Chess Openings: Traps and Zaps'', Simon & Schuster, 1989, p. 92. {{ISBN|0-671-65690-2}}.</ref> Alternatively, White can continue developing their ], remaining four pawns up. In either case, White has a clearly winning position.


Since taking the knight is fatal, after 3.Nxe5 Black should instead play 3...Qe7!<ref name="Pandolfinip.91">Pandolfini 1989, p. 91.</ref> (other Black third moves, such as 3...d5, lead to 4. Qh5+! g6 5. Nxg6!). After 4.Nf3 (4.Qh5+? g6 5.Nxg6 Qxe4+ 6.Be2 Qxg6 leaves Black ahead a piece for a pawn) <ref name="Pandolfinip.91"/> Qxe4+ 5.Be2, Black has regained the pawn but has lost time and weakened his kingside, and will lose more time when White chases the ] with Nc3, or 0-0, Re1, and a move by the ] on e2. ] in '']'' analyzes instead 4...d5 5.d3 dxe4 6.dxe4, when White had a small advantage in ]–], St. Petersburg 1897.<ref>''Modern Chess Openings, 15th Edition'', Random House Puzzles & Games, 2008, p. 156. {{ISBN|978-0-8129-3682-7}}.</ref> Since taking the knight is fatal, after 3.Nxe5 Black should instead play 3...Qe7!<ref name="Pandolfinip.91">Pandolfini 1989, p. 91.</ref> (Other Black third moves, such as 3...d5, lead to 4. Qh5+! g6 5. Nxg6!) After 4.Nf3 (4.Qh5+? g6 5.Nxg6 Qxe4+ 6.Be2 Qxg6 leaves Black ahead a piece for a pawn)<ref name="Pandolfinip.91" /> 4...Qxe4+ 5.Be2, Black has regained the pawn but has lost {{chessgloss|time}} and weakened their kingside, and will lose more time when White chases the ] with Nc3, or 0-0, Re1, and a move by the ] on e2. ] in '']'' analyses instead 4...d5 5.d3 dxe4 6.dxe4, when White had a small advantage in ]–], ] 1897.<ref>''Modern Chess Openings, 15th Edition'', Random House Puzzles & Games, 2008, p. 156. {{ISBN|978-0-8129-3682-7}}.</ref>


The fact that Black can only regain the pawn with 3...Qe7! shows that 2...f6? did not really defend the e-pawn at all. Indeed, even a relatively useless move like 2...a6?! is less risky than 2...f6?. After 2...a6?! 3.Nxe5, Black could still regain the pawn with 3...Qe7 4.d4 d6, when he would have done so without weakening his kingside or depriving the king's knight of its best square. The fact that Black can only regain the pawn with 3...Qe7! shows that 2...f6? did not really defend the e-pawn at all. Indeed, even a relatively useless move like 2...a6{{chesspunc|?!}} is less risky than 2...f6? After 2...a6?! 3.Nxe5, Black could still regain the pawn with 3...Qe7 4.d4 d6, but has not weakened the kingside or prevented the {{chessgloss|king's knight}} from developing to f6.


==History== ==History==
{{Chess diagram small {{Chess diagram small
| tright |tright
|Schiffers vs. Chigorin, 1897
|

|rd| | | |kd|bd|nd|rd |rd| | | |kd|bd|nd|rd
|pd|pd|pd|bd| | |pd|pd |pd|pd|pd|bd| | |pd|pd
Line 70: Line 67:
|pl|pl|pl| |bl|pl|pl|pl |pl|pl|pl| |bl|pl|pl|pl
|rl| |bl|ql| |rl|kl| |rl| |bl|ql| |rl|kl|
|Position after 10.Ne5!, White wins Black's queen. If the Knight is captured, 11. Bh5 pins the queen to the king, while 10...Qf5 leads to 11. Bg4 and the queen is trapped (11...Qxe5 12. Qxd7#). |Position after 10.Ne5!, White wins Black's queen. If the knight is captured, 11.Bh5 pins the queen to the king, while 10...Qf5 leads to 11.Bg4 and the queen is trapped (11...Qxe5 12.Qxd7#).
}} }}


Ironically, the opening is named after the ] ] ] (1480–1544), who condemned it as weak. In 1847, ] wrote of 2...f6, "This move occurs in the old work of Damiano, who gives some ingenious variations on it. ], and later authors, have hence entitled it 'Damiano's Gambit'."<ref>Howard Staunton, ''The Chess-Player's Handbook'', Henry C. Bohn, 1847, p. 60.</ref> Staunton's contemporary ] instead, more logically, reserved the term "Damiano Gambit" for the knight sacrifice played by White on the third move: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5.<ref>Walker wrote of the knight sacrifice, "This constitutes the Damiano Gambit." George Walker, ''The Art of Chess-Play: A New Treatise on the Game of Chess'' (4th ed. 1846), Sherwood, Gilbert, & Piper, p. 236.</ref> Staunton referred to 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6, a highly respected move then and now, as "Damiano's defence to the K. Kt.'s opening".<ref>Staunton, p. 64.</ref> The opening is named after the Portuguese chess author ] (1480–1544), despite the fact that he condemned it as weak and the book may actually be ]’s writing that he signed. In 1847, ] wrote of 2...f6, "This move occurs in the old work of Damiano, who gives some ingenious variations on it. ], and later authors, have hence entitled it 'Damiano's Gambit'."<ref>Howard Staunton, ''The Chess-Player's Handbook'', Henry C. Bohn, 1847, p. 60.</ref> Instead, Staunton's contemporary ] more logically reserved the term "Damiano Gambit" for the knight sacrifice played by White on the third move: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5.<ref>Walker wrote of the knight sacrifice, "This constitutes the Damiano Gambit." George Walker, ''The Art of Chess-Play: A New Treatise on the Game of Chess'' (4th ed. 1846), Sherwood, Gilbert, & Piper, p. 236.</ref> Staunton referred to 2...Nc6, a highly respected move then and now, as "Damiano's defence to the {{chessgloss|king knight|K. Kt.}}'s opening".<ref>Staunton, p. 64.</ref>


The Damiano Defence is never seen today in top-level play. The greatest player to play the Damiano in serious master competition was Mikhail Chigorin. As noted above, he played the 3...Qe7 line in a game against Emmanuel Schiffers at ] 1897. Chigorin lost his queen on move 10 (see diagram), but Schiffers played so weakly that Chigorin later missed a brilliant ] mate and only escaped when Schiffers agreed to a ] in a winning position.<ref>{{cite web The Damiano Defence is never seen today in top-level play. The greatest player to play the Damiano in serious master competition was Chigorin. As noted above, he played the 3...Qe7 line in a game against Schiffers at St. Petersburg 1897. Chigorin lost his queen on move 10 (see diagram), but Schiffers played so weakly that Chigorin later missed a brilliant {{chessgloss|forced mate}} and only escaped when Schiffers agreed to a ] in a winning position.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/diary_12.htm|title=The Richter riddle|work=Open Chess Diary (scroll down to No. 222)|accessdate=2006-03-20}}</ref> Robert McGregor played the Damiano in a 1964 ] against ], essaying 3...Qe7 4.Nf3 d5 5.d3 dxe4 6.dxe4 Qxe4+ 7.Be2 Bf5, and drew, although Fischer did not play the best moves.<ref>. Chessstuff.blogspot.com. Retrieved on 2009-04-02.</ref>
|url=http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/diary_12.htm
|title=The Richter riddle
|work=OPEN CHESS DIARY (scroll down to No. 222)
|accessdate=2006-03-20}}</ref> Robert McGregor played the Damiano in a 1964 ] against ], essaying 3...Qe7 4.Nf3 d5 5.d3 dxe4 6.dxe4 Qxe4+ 7.Be2 Bf5, and drew, although Fischer did not play the best moves.<ref>. Chessstuff.blogspot.com. Retrieved on 2009-04-02.</ref>


==References == ==References ==
{{reflist}} {{Reflist|30em}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{wikibooks|Chess Opening Theory|1. e4/1...e5/2. Nf3/2...f6|Damiano Defence}} {{wikibooks|Chess Opening Theory|1. e4/1...e5/2. Nf3/2...f6|Damiano Defence}}

*{{cite web *{{cite web
| url=http://kenilworthian.blogspot.ca/2010/07/defeating-damianos-defense.html | url=http://kenilworthian.blogspot.ca/2010/07/defeating-damianos-defense.html
Line 92: Line 84:
| publisher=The Kenilworthian | publisher=The Kenilworthian
| date=2010-07-28 | date=2010-07-28
| accessdate=2012-07-20}} A comprehensive list of material available online about Damiano's Defense. | accessdate=2012-07-20}} A comprehensive list of material available online about Damiano's Defence.

{{Chess}}
{{Authority control}}


] ]

Latest revision as of 03:44, 3 December 2024

Chess opening
Damiano Defence
abcdefgh
8a8 black rookb8 black knightc8 black bishopd8 black queene8 black kingf8 black bishopg8 black knighth8 black rooka7 black pawnb7 black pawnc7 black pawnd7 black pawng7 black pawnh7 black pawnf6 black pawne5 black pawne4 white pawnf3 white knighta2 white pawnb2 white pawnc2 white pawnd2 white pawnf2 white pawng2 white pawnh2 white pawna1 white rookb1 white knightc1 white bishopd1 white queene1 white kingf1 white bishoph1 white rook8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Moves1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6
ECOC40
Named afterPedro Damiano
ParentKing's Knight Opening

The Damiano Defence is a chess opening beginning with the moves:

  1. e4 e5
  2. Nf3 f6?

The defence is one of the oldest chess openings, with games dating back to the 16th century. It is a weak opening that gives a large advantage for White after 3.Nxe5. Even if White does not go for this continuation, simple development leads to an advantage since 2...f6 prevents the g8-knight from developing to f6 and weakens Black's kingside.

The ECO code for the Damiano Defence is C40 (King's Knight Opening).

This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.

3.d4 and 3.Bc4

Black's 2...f6? is a weak move that exposes Black's king, weakens their kingside and prevents Black from developing their knight to f6. The moves 3.d4 and 3.Bc4 are strong replies; I.A. Horowitz wrote (substituting algebraic notation for his descriptive notation), "Simple and potent is 3.Bc4 d6 4.d4 Nc6 5.c3, after which Black chokes to death."

3.Nxe5!

abcdefgh
8a8 black rookb8 black knightc8 black bishopd8 black queenf8 black bishopg8 black knighth8 black rooka7 black pawnb7 black pawnc7 black pawng7 black pawng6 black kingd5 white bishope5 white queenh5 black pawne4 white pawnh4 white pawna2 white pawnb2 white pawnc2 white pawnd2 white pawnf2 white pawng2 white pawna1 white rookb1 white knightc1 white bishope1 white kingh1 white rook8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 8...h5

The most forceful move is the knight sacrifice 3.Nxe5! Taking the knight with 3...fxe5? exposes Black to a deadly attack after 4.Qh5+ Ke7 (4...g6 loses to 5.Qxe5+, forking king and rook, leaving Black down the exchange, though other options are worse) 5.Qxe5+ Kf7 6.Bc4+ d5! (6...Kg6?? 7.Qf5+ is devastating and leads to mate shortly after) 7.Bxd5+ Kg6 8.h4 (8.d4? Bd6!) 8...h5 (see diagram; 8...h6 is similar, except Black cannot play 9...Bxb7 because of 10.Qf5#) 9.Bxb7! Bd6 (9...Bxb7 10.Qf5+ Kh6 11.d4+ g5 12.Qf7! mates quickly) 10.Qa5!, when Black's best is 10...Nc6 11.Bxc6 Rb8, and now White can play 12.Qxa7 with five extra pawns. Bruce Pandolfini notes that Black's opening is thus sometimes described as "the five pawns gambit". Alternatively, White can continue developing their pieces, remaining four pawns up. In either case, White has a clearly winning position.

Since taking the knight is fatal, after 3.Nxe5 Black should instead play 3...Qe7! (Other Black third moves, such as 3...d5, lead to 4. Qh5+! g6 5. Nxg6!) After 4.Nf3 (4.Qh5+? g6 5.Nxg6 Qxe4+ 6.Be2 Qxg6 leaves Black ahead a piece for a pawn) 4...Qxe4+ 5.Be2, Black has regained the pawn but has lost time and weakened their kingside, and will lose more time when White chases the queen with Nc3, or 0-0, Re1, and a move by the bishop on e2. Nick de Firmian in Modern Chess Openings analyses instead 4...d5 5.d3 dxe4 6.dxe4, when White had a small advantage in Emmanuel SchiffersMikhail Chigorin, St. Petersburg 1897.

The fact that Black can only regain the pawn with 3...Qe7! shows that 2...f6? did not really defend the e-pawn at all. Indeed, even a relatively useless move like 2...a6?! is less risky than 2...f6? After 2...a6?! 3.Nxe5, Black could still regain the pawn with 3...Qe7 4.d4 d6, but has not weakened the kingside or prevented the king's knight from developing to f6.

History

Schiffers vs. Chigorin, 1897
abcdefgh
8a8 black rooke8 black kingf8 black bishopg8 black knighth8 black rooka7 black pawnb7 black pawnc7 black pawnd7 black bishopg7 black pawnh7 black pawnc6 black knightf6 black pawng6 black queene5 white knightc3 white knighta2 white pawnb2 white pawnc2 white pawne2 white bishopf2 white pawng2 white pawnh2 white pawna1 white rookc1 white bishopd1 white queenf1 white rookg1 white king8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Position after 10.Ne5!, White wins Black's queen. If the knight is captured, 11.Bh5 pins the queen to the king, while 10...Qf5 leads to 11.Bg4 and the queen is trapped (11...Qxe5 12.Qxd7#).

The opening is named after the Portuguese chess author Pedro Damiano (1480–1544), despite the fact that he condemned it as weak and the book may actually be Francesc Vicent’s writing that he signed. In 1847, Howard Staunton wrote of 2...f6, "This move occurs in the old work of Damiano, who gives some ingenious variations on it. Lopez, and later authors, have hence entitled it 'Damiano's Gambit'." Instead, Staunton's contemporary George Walker more logically reserved the term "Damiano Gambit" for the knight sacrifice played by White on the third move: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5. Staunton referred to 2...Nc6, a highly respected move then and now, as "Damiano's defence to the K. Kt.'s opening".

The Damiano Defence is never seen today in top-level play. The greatest player to play the Damiano in serious master competition was Chigorin. As noted above, he played the 3...Qe7 line in a game against Schiffers at St. Petersburg 1897. Chigorin lost his queen on move 10 (see diagram), but Schiffers played so weakly that Chigorin later missed a brilliant forced mate and only escaped when Schiffers agreed to a draw in a winning position. Robert McGregor played the Damiano in a 1964 simultaneous exhibition against Bobby Fischer, essaying 3...Qe7 4.Nf3 d5 5.d3 dxe4 6.dxe4 Qxe4+ 7.Be2 Bf5, and drew, although Fischer did not play the best moves.

References

  1. I.A. Horowitz, Chess Openings: Theory and Practice, Simon and Schuster, 1964, p. 227 n. 31.
  2. Understanding the Chess Openings, Sam Collins, 2005, p. 28.
  3. Bruce Pandolfini, Chess Openings: Traps and Zaps, Simon & Schuster, 1989, p. 92. ISBN 0-671-65690-2.
  4. ^ Pandolfini 1989, p. 91.
  5. Modern Chess Openings, 15th Edition, Random House Puzzles & Games, 2008, p. 156. ISBN 978-0-8129-3682-7.
  6. Howard Staunton, The Chess-Player's Handbook, Henry C. Bohn, 1847, p. 60.
  7. Walker wrote of the knight sacrifice, "This constitutes the Damiano Gambit." George Walker, The Art of Chess-Play: A New Treatise on the Game of Chess (4th ed. 1846), Sherwood, Gilbert, & Piper, p. 236.
  8. Staunton, p. 64.
  9. "The Richter riddle". Open Chess Diary (scroll down to No. 222). Retrieved 2006-03-20.
  10. Bobby Fischer and Damiano's Defense. Chessstuff.blogspot.com. Retrieved on 2009-04-02.

External links

  • "Defeating Damiano's Defense". The Kenilworthian. 2010-07-28. Retrieved 2012-07-20. A comprehensive list of material available online about Damiano's Defence.
Chess
Outline
Equipment
History
Rules
Terms
Tactics
Strategy
Openings
Flank opening
King's Pawn Game
Queen's Pawn Game
Other
Endgames
Tournaments
Art and media
Related
Categories: