Misplaced Pages

Cyclic model: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:57, 13 December 2019 edit203.99.211.133 (talk) Undid revision 930525165 by Editor2020 (talk) - The mentioned source contains an elaborate analysis on the Hinduism scriptures. The texts which were referred during the analysis is also mentioned in the source. The analysis seems to be completely logical.Tag: Undo← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:32, 5 December 2024 edit undoWikiEditor50 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users64,583 edits Lowercase "second law of thermodynamics" following usage in main "Second law of thermodynamics" pageTag: Visual edit 
(38 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Cosmological models involving indefinite, self-sustaining cycles}}
{{Primary sources|article|date=February 2013}} {{Primary sources|article|date=February 2013}}
{{cosmology}} {{cosmology}}
A '''cyclic model''' (or '''oscillating model''') is any of several ]s in which the ] follows infinite, or indefinite, self-sustaining cycles. For example, the oscillating universe theory briefly considered by ] in 1930 theorized a universe following an ] series of oscillations, each beginning with a ] and ending with a ]; in the interim, the universe would ] for a period of time before the gravitational attraction of matter causes it to collapse back in and undergo a ]. A '''cyclic model''' (or '''oscillating model''') is any of several ]s in which the ] follows infinite, or indefinite, self-sustaining cycles. For example, the oscillating universe theory briefly considered by ] in 1930 theorized a universe following an ] series of oscillations, each beginning with a ] and ending with a ]; in the interim, the universe would ] for a period of time before the gravitational attraction of matter causes it to collapse back in and undergo a ].


==Overview== == Overview ==
In the 1920s, theoretical physicists, most notably ], considered the possibility of a cyclic model for the universe as an (everlasting) alternative to the model of an ]. However, work by ] in 1934 showed that these early attempts failed because of the cyclic problem: according to the ], entropy can only increase.<ref name="Tolman 1934"> In the 1920s, theoretical physicists, most notably ], considered the possibility of a cyclic model for the universe as an (everlasting) alternative to the model of an ]{{Citation needed|reason=Looking for Einstein's Article on the topic, Little doubt of the validity of statement|date=November 2024}}. In 1922, ] introduced the Oscillating Universe Theory.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Friedmann universe {{!}} Expanding Universe, Big Bang & Dark Energy {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/science/Friedmann-universe |access-date=2023-09-24 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref> However, work by ] in 1934 showed that these early attempts failed because of the cyclic problem: according to the ], entropy can only increase.<ref name="Tolman 1934">
{{cite book |author=Tolman |first=R. C. |title=Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology |date=1987 |publisher=Dover |isbn=978-0-486-65383-9 |location=New York |lccn=34032023 |orig-year=1934}}</ref> This implies that successive cycles grow longer and larger. Extrapolating back in time, cycles before the present one become shorter and smaller culminating again in a Big Bang and thus not replacing it. This puzzling situation remained for many decades until the early 21st century when the recently discovered ] component provided new hope for a consistent cyclic cosmology.<ref name="Frampton 2006">
{{cite book
{{cite arXiv |eprint=astro-ph/0612243 |first=P. H. |last=Frampton |title=On Cyclic Universes |date=2006}}</ref> In 2011, a five-year survey of 200,000 galaxies and spanning 7 billion years of cosmic time confirmed that "dark energy is driving our universe apart at accelerating speeds."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Dark energy is driving universe apart: NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer finds dark energy repulsive |url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110519113152.htm |access-date=2023-08-22 |website=ScienceDaily |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Mandelbaum |first1=Rachel |last2=Blake |first2=Chris |last3=Bridle |first3=Sarah |last4=Abdalla |first4=Filipe B. |last5=Brough |first5=Sarah |last6=Colless |first6=Matthew |last7=Couch |first7=Warrick |last8=Croom |first8=Scott |last9=Davis |first9=Tamara |author-link9=Tamara Davis |last10=Drinkwater |first10=Michael J. |last11=Forster |first11=Karl |last12=Glazebrook |first12=Karl |last13=Jelliffe |first13=Ben |last14=Jurek |first14=Russell J. |last15=Li |first15=I-hui |year=2011 |title=The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Direct constraints on blue galaxy intrinsic alignments at intermediate redshifts |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=410 |issue=2 |pages=844–859 |arxiv=0911.5347 |bibcode=2011MNRAS.410..844M |doi=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17485.x |s2cid=36510728 |last16=Madore |first16=Barry |last17=Martin |first17=Chris |last18=Pimbblet |first18=Kevin |last19=Poole |first19=Gregory B. |last20=Pracy |first20=Michael |last21=Sharp |first21=Rob |last22=Wisnioski |first22=Emily |last23=Woods |first23=David |last24=Wyder |first24=Ted|doi-access=free }}</ref>
|author=R. C. Tolman
|title=Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology
|publisher=Dover
|location=New York
|origyear=1934
|date=1987
|isbn=978-0-486-65383-9
|lccn=34032023
}}</ref> This implies that successive cycles grow longer and larger. Extrapolating back in time, cycles before the present one become shorter and smaller culminating again in a Big Bang and thus not replacing it. This puzzling situation remained for many decades until the early 21st century when the recently discovered ] component provided new hope for a consistent cyclic cosmology.<ref name="Frampton 2006">
{{cite arXiv
|author=P. H. Frampton
|title=On Cyclic Universes
|eprint=astro-ph/0612243
|date=2006
}}</ref> In 2011, a five-year survey of 200,000 galaxies and spanning 7 billion years of cosmic time confirmed that "dark energy is driving our universe apart at accelerating speeds."<ref></ref><ref></ref>


One new cyclic model is ] model of the ], derived from the earlier ] model. It was proposed in 2001 by ] of ] and ] of ]. The theory describes a universe exploding into existence not just once, but repeatedly over time.<ref name="Steinhardt, Turok 2001a"> One new cyclic model is the ] model of the ], derived from the earlier ] model. It was proposed in 2001 by ] of ] and ] of ]. The theory describes a universe exploding into existence not just once, but repeatedly over time.<ref name="Steinhardt, Turok 2001a">
{{cite journal |author=Steinhardt |first1=P. J. |last2=Turok |first2=N. |year=2002 |title=Cosmic Evolution in a Cyclic Universe |journal=Physical Review D |volume=65 |issue=12 |pages=126003 |arxiv=hep-th/0111098 |bibcode=2002PhRvD..65l6003S |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.65.126003 |s2cid=1342094}}</ref><ref name="Steinhardt, Turok 2001b">
{{cite journal
{{cite journal |author=Steinhardt |first1=P. J. |last2=Turok |first2=N. |date=2001 |title=A Cyclic Model of the Universe |journal=Science |volume=296 |issue=5572 |pages=1436–1439 |arxiv=hep-th/0111030 |bibcode=2002Sci...296.1436S |doi=10.1126/science.1070462 |pmid=11976408 |s2cid=1346107}}</ref> The theory could potentially explain why a repulsive form of energy known as the ], which is accelerating the expansion of the universe, is several orders of magnitude smaller than predicted by the standard ] model.
|author=P. J. Steinhardt, N. Turok
|title=Cosmic Evolution in a Cyclic Universe
|year=2002
|issue=12
|pages=126003
|volume=65
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.65.126003
|journal=Physical Review D
|arxiv=hep-th/0111098
|bibcode = 2002PhRvD..65l6003S }}</ref><ref name="Steinhardt, Turok 2001b">
{{cite journal
|author=P. J. Steinhardt, N. Turok
|title=A Cyclic Model of the Universe
|date=2001
|doi=10.1126/science.1070462
|journal=Science
|volume=296
|issue=5572
|pages=1436–1439
|pmid=11976408
|arxiv=hep-th/0111030
|bibcode = 2002Sci...296.1436S }}</ref> The theory could potentially explain why a repulsive form of energy known as the ], which is accelerating the expansion of the universe, is several orders of magnitude smaller than predicted by the standard ] model.


A different cyclic model relying on the notion of ] was proposed in 2007 by Lauris Baum and ] of the ].<ref name="Baum, Frampton 2007"> A different cyclic model relying on the notion of ] was proposed in 2007 by Lauris Baum and ] of the ].<ref name="Baum, Frampton 2007">
{{cite journal |author=Baum |first1=Lewis |last2=Frampton |first2=P. H. |year=2008 |title=Entropy of Contracting Universe in Cyclic Cosmology |journal=Modern Physics Letters A |volume=23 |issue=1 |pages=33–36 |arxiv=hep-th/0703162 |bibcode=2008MPLA...23...33B |doi=10.1142/S0217732308026170 |s2cid=719844}}</ref>
{{cite journal
|author=L. Baum, P. H. Frampton
|title=Entropy of Contracting Universe in Cyclic Cosmology
|year=2008
|pages=33–36
|volume=23
|issue=1
|doi=10.1142/S0217732308026170
|journal=Modern Physics Letters A
|arxiv=hep-th/0703162
|bibcode = 2008MPLA...23...33B }}</ref>


Other cyclic models include ] and ]. Other cyclic models include ] and ].


==The Steinhardt&ndash;Turok model== == The Steinhardt&ndash;Turok model ==
{{main|Ekpyrotic universe}}
In this cyclic model, two parallel ] planes or ] collide periodically in a higher-dimensional space.<ref name="Paul J. Steinhardt, Neil Turok 2004"> In this cyclic model, two parallel ] planes or ] collide periodically in a higher-dimensional space.<ref name="Paul J. Steinhardt, Neil Turok 2004">
{{cite journal |author=Steinhardt |first1=P. J. |last2=Turok |first2=N. |year=2005 |title=The Cyclic Model Simplified |journal=New Astronomy Reviews |volume=49 |issue=2–6 |pages=43–57 |arxiv=astro-ph/0404480 |bibcode=2005NewAR..49...43S |doi=10.1016/j.newar.2005.01.003 |s2cid=16034194}}</ref> The visible four-dimensional universe lies on one of these ]. The collisions correspond to a reversal from contraction to expansion, or a ] followed immediately by a ]. The matter and radiation we see today were generated during the most recent collision in a pattern dictated by ]s created before the branes. After billions of years the universe reached the state we observe today; after additional billions of years it will ultimately begin to contract again. ] corresponds to a force between the branes, and serves the crucial role of solving the ], ], and ] problems. Moreover, the cycles can continue indefinitely into the past and the future, and the solution is an ], so it can provide a complete history of the universe.
{{cite journal
|author=P. J. Steinhardt, N. Turok
|title=The Cyclic Model Simplified
|year=2005
|pages=43–57
|issue=2–6
|volume=49
|doi=10.1016/j.newar.2005.01.003
|journal=New Astronomy Reviews
|arxiv=astro-ph/0404480
|bibcode = 2005NewAR..49...43S }}</ref> The visible four-dimensional universe lies on one of these ]. The collisions correspond to a reversal from contraction to expansion, or a ] followed immediately by a ]. The matter and radiation we see today were generated during the most recent collision in a pattern dictated by ]s created before the branes. After billions of years the universe reached the state we observe today; after additional billions of years it will ultimately begin to contract again. ] corresponds to a force between the branes, and serves the crucial role of solving the ], ], and ] problems. Moreover, the cycles can continue indefinitely into the past and the future, and the solution is an ], so it can provide a complete history of the universe.


As ] showed, the earlier cyclic model failed because the universe would undergo inevitable ] ].<ref name="Tolman 1934" /> However, the newer cyclic model evades this by having a net expansion each cycle, preventing ] from building up. However, there remain major open issues in the model. Foremost among them is that colliding ] are not understood by string theorists, and nobody knows if the ] spectrum will be destroyed by the big crunch. Moreover, as with ], while the general character of the forces (in the ] scenario, a force between branes) required to create the ]s is known, there is no candidate from ].<ref>{{cite book As ] showed, the earlier cyclic model failed because the universe would undergo inevitable ] ].<ref name="Tolman 1934" /> However, the newer cyclic model evades this by having a net expansion each cycle, preventing ] from building up. However, there remain major open issues in the model. Foremost among them is that colliding ] are not understood by string theorists, and nobody knows if the ] spectrum will be destroyed by the big crunch. Moreover, as with ], while the general character of the forces (in the ] scenario, a force between branes) required to create the ]s is known, there is no candidate from ].<ref>{{cite book |author=Woit |first=Peter |title=Not Even Wrong |date=2006 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-09-948864-4 |location=London |author-link=Peter Woit}}</ref>
|author=]
|title= Not Even Wrong
|date= 2006
|publisher= ]
|location= London
|isbn= 978-0-09-948864-4
}}</ref>


==The Baum–Frampton model== == The Baum–Frampton model ==
This more recent cyclic model of 2007 assumes an exotic form of dark energy called ],<ref name="Baum, Frampton 2007" /><ref name="Baum, Frampton 2006"> This more recent cyclic model of 2007 assumes an exotic form of dark energy called ],<ref name="Baum, Frampton 2007" /><ref name="Baum, Frampton 2006">
{{cite journal |author=Baum |first1=L. |last2=Frampton |first2=P. H. |date=2007 |title=Turnaround in Cyclic Cosmology |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=98 |issue=7 |page=071301 |arxiv=hep-th/0610213 |bibcode=2007PhRvL..98g1301B |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.071301 |pmid=17359014 |s2cid=17698158}}</ref> which possesses negative kinetic energy and would usually cause the universe to end in a ]. This condition is achieved if the universe is dominated by dark energy with a cosmological ] parameter <math>w</math> satisfying the condition <math>w\equiv \frac{p}{\rho} <-1</math>, for ] <math>{\rho}</math> and ] p. By contrast, Steinhardt–Turok assume <math>w {\geq}-1</math>. In the Baum–Frampton model, a septillionth (or less) <!-- Use 10<sup>−X</sup> notation please-->of a second (i.e. 10<sup>−24</sup> seconds or less) before the would-be Big Rip, a turnaround occurs and only one causal patch is retained as our universe. The generic patch contains no ], ] or ]; only ] – and its entropy thereby vanishes. The ] of contraction of this much smaller universe takes place with constant vanishing entropy and with no matter including no ] which disintegrated before turnaround.
{{cite journal
|title=Turnaround in Cyclic Cosmology
|author=L. Baum and P. H. Frampton
|journal=Physical Review Letters
|volume=98 |page=071301
|date=2007
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.071301
|pmid=17359014
|issue=7
|arxiv=hep-th/0610213
|bibcode=2007PhRvL..98g1301B
}}</ref> which possesses negative kinetic energy and would usually cause the universe to end in a ]. This condition is achieved if the universe is dominated by dark energy with a cosmological ] parameter <math>w</math> satisfying the condition <math>w\equiv \frac{p}{\rho} <-1</math>, for ] <math>{\rho}</math> and ] p. By contrast, Steinhardt–Turok assume <math>w {\geq}-1</math> . In the Baum–Frampton model, a septillionth (or less) <!-- Use 10<sup>−X</sup> notation please--> of a second (i.e. 10<sup>−24</sup> seconds or less) before the would-be Big Rip, a turnaround occurs and only one causal patch is retained as our universe. The generic patch contains no ], ] or ]; only ] – and its entropy thereby vanishes. The ] of contraction of this much smaller universe takes place with constant vanishing entropy and with no matter including no ] which disintegrated before turnaround.


The idea that the universe "comes back empty" is a central new idea of this cyclic model, and avoids many difficulties confronting matter in a contracting phase such as excessive ], proliferation and expansion of ], as well as going through ]s such as those of QCD and electroweak symmetry restoration. Any of these would tend strongly to produce an unwanted premature bounce, simply to avoid violation of the ]. The condition of <math>w</math> < −1 may be logically inevitable in a truly infinitely cyclic cosmology because of the entropy problem. Nevertheless, many technical back up calculations are necessary to confirm consistency of the approach. Although the model borrows ideas from ], it is not necessarily committed to strings, or to ], yet such speculative devices may provide the most expeditious methods to investigate the ]. The value of <math>w</math> in the Baum–Frampton model can be made arbitrarily close to, but must be less than, −1. The idea that the universe "comes back empty" is a central new idea of this cyclic model, and avoids many difficulties confronting matter in a contracting phase such as excessive ], proliferation and expansion of ], as well as going through ]s such as those of QCD and electroweak symmetry restoration. Any of these would tend strongly to produce an unwanted premature bounce, simply to avoid violation of the ]. The condition of <math>w <-1</math> may be logically inevitable in a truly infinitely cyclic cosmology because of the entropy problem. Nevertheless, many technical back up calculations are necessary to confirm consistency of the approach. Although the model borrows ideas from ], it is not necessarily committed to strings, or to ], yet such speculative devices may provide the most expeditious methods to investigate the ]. The value of <math>w</math> in the Baum–Frampton model can be made arbitrarily close to, but must be less than, −1.


== Other cyclic models == == Other cyclic models ==
* ]—a general relativity based theory due to ] in which the universe expands until all the matter decays and is turned to light—so there is nothing in the universe that has any time or distance scale associated with it. This permits it to become identical with the Big Bang, so starting the next cycle. * ]—a general relativity based theory by ] in which the universe expands until all the matter decays and is turned to light—so there is nothing in the universe that has any time or distance scale associated with it. This permits it to become identical with the Big Bang, so starting the next cycle.
* ] which predicts a "quantum bridge" between contracting and expanding cosmological branches. * ] which predicts a "quantum bridge" between contracting and expanding cosmological branches.


== See also ==
==Pulsating Universe as in Hinduism==
We get reference of universe following a cyclic repetition in Hindu scriptures also. The scriptures mention that the universe has come across countless numbers of iterations before the birth of current instance. Also, according to the archives, the universe will also continue this infinite cycles in future. To denote the end of the universe, The texts used the term "Dissolution" instead of "Destruction". The major difference the Hinduism model has with today's, is Hinduism did not consider "''Time''" as something which was created along with the universe. On the contrary, they tell that "''Time''" is eternal; even after universe is dissolved, time will still remain active. The exact length of lifetime of a universe is mentioned as 4.32 Billion years. ''<sup>]</sup>''

==See also==
'''Physical cosmologies:''' '''Physical cosmologies:'''
* ] * ]
Line 122: Line 48:
* ] * ]


== Notes == == References ==
{{reflist}} {{Reflist}}


==Further reading== == Further reading ==
*{{cite book |author=Steinhardt |title=Endless Universe |last2=Turok |first2=N. |first1=P. J. |url=https://archive.org/details/endlessuniverseb0000stei |url-access=registration |publisher=Doubleday |location=New York, New York |language=en-us |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-385-50964-0}}
*{{cite book
*{{cite book |author=Tolman |first=R. C. |title=Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology |publisher=Dover |location=New York |orig-year=1934 |date=1987 |isbn=978-0-486-65383-9 |lccn=34032023}}
|author=P. J. Steinhardt, N. Turok
*{{cite journal |author=Baum |first1=L. |last2=Frampton |first2=P. H. |title=Turnaround in Cyclic Cosmology |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=98 |page=071301 |date=2007 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.071301 |pmid=17359014 |issue=7 |arxiv=hep-th/0610213 |bibcode=2007PhRvL..98g1301B |s2cid=17698158}}
|title=Endless Universe
* {{cite journal |last1=Dicke |first1=R. H. |last2=Peebles |first2=P. J. E.| last3=Roll |first3=P. G. |last4=Wilkinson |first4=D. T. |title=Cosmic Black-Body Radiation. |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |volume=142 |year=1965 |pages=414 |issn=0004-637X |doi=10.1086/148306 |bibcode=1965ApJ...142..414D |language=en}}
|url=https://archive.org/details/endlessuniverseb0000stei
|url-access=registration
|publisher=Doubleday
|location=New York
|date=2007
|isbn=978-0-385-50964-0
}}
*{{cite book
|author=R. C. Tolman
|title=Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology
|publisher=Dover
|location=New York
|origyear=1934
|date=1987
|isbn=978-0-486-65383-9
|lccn=34032023
}}
*{{cite journal
|author=L. Baum and P. H. Frampton
|title=Turnaround in Cyclic Cosmology
|journal=Physical Review Letters
|volume=98 |page=071301
|date=2007
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.071301
|pmid=17359014
|issue=7
|arxiv=hep-th/0610213
|bibcode=2007PhRvL..98g1301B
}}
*R. H. Dicke, P. J. E. Peebles, P. G. Roll and D. T. Wilkinson, "Cosmic Black-Body Radiation", ''Astrophysical Journal'' '''142''' (1965), 414. This paper discussed the oscillatory universe as one of the main cosmological possibilities of the time.
*S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, ''The large-scale structure of space-time'' (Cambridge, 1973). *S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, ''The large-scale structure of space-time'' (Cambridge, 1973).
*{{cite book |author=Penrose |first=Roger |title=Cycles of Time: an extraordinary new view of the universe |publisher=] |location=London |language=en-us |date=2010 |isbn=978-0-224-08036-1 |title-link=Cycles of Time (book)}}
*{{cite book
|author=R. Penrose
|title=Cycles of Time: an extraordinary new view of the universe
|publisher=]
|location=London
|date=2010
|isbn=978-0-224-08036-1
|title-link=Cycles of Time (book)
}}


==External links== == External links ==
* , Department of Physics, Princeton University * , Department of Physics, Princeton University
* , Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill * , Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
* *
* *
{{Portal bar|Physics|Astronomy|Stars|Spaceflight|Outer space|Solar System}}
*''''''
{{Authority control}}


] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 00:32, 5 December 2024

Cosmological models involving indefinite, self-sustaining cycles
This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources.
Find sources: "Cyclic model" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Part of a series on
Physical cosmology
Full-sky image derived from nine years' WMAP data
Early universe
Backgrounds
Expansion · Future
Components · Structure
Components
Structure
Experiments
Scientists
Subject history

A cyclic model (or oscillating model) is any of several cosmological models in which the universe follows infinite, or indefinite, self-sustaining cycles. For example, the oscillating universe theory briefly considered by Albert Einstein in 1930 theorized a universe following an eternal series of oscillations, each beginning with a Big Bang and ending with a Big Crunch; in the interim, the universe would expand for a period of time before the gravitational attraction of matter causes it to collapse back in and undergo a bounce.

Overview

In the 1920s, theoretical physicists, most notably Albert Einstein, considered the possibility of a cyclic model for the universe as an (everlasting) alternative to the model of an expanding universe. In 1922, Alexander Friedmann introduced the Oscillating Universe Theory. However, work by Richard C. Tolman in 1934 showed that these early attempts failed because of the cyclic problem: according to the second law of thermodynamics, entropy can only increase. This implies that successive cycles grow longer and larger. Extrapolating back in time, cycles before the present one become shorter and smaller culminating again in a Big Bang and thus not replacing it. This puzzling situation remained for many decades until the early 21st century when the recently discovered dark energy component provided new hope for a consistent cyclic cosmology. In 2011, a five-year survey of 200,000 galaxies and spanning 7 billion years of cosmic time confirmed that "dark energy is driving our universe apart at accelerating speeds."

One new cyclic model is the brane cosmology model of the creation of the universe, derived from the earlier ekpyrotic model. It was proposed in 2001 by Paul Steinhardt of Princeton University and Neil Turok of Cambridge University. The theory describes a universe exploding into existence not just once, but repeatedly over time. The theory could potentially explain why a repulsive form of energy known as the cosmological constant, which is accelerating the expansion of the universe, is several orders of magnitude smaller than predicted by the standard Big Bang model.

A different cyclic model relying on the notion of phantom energy was proposed in 2007 by Lauris Baum and Paul Frampton of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Other cyclic models include conformal cyclic cosmology and loop quantum cosmology.

The Steinhardt–Turok model

Main article: Ekpyrotic universe

In this cyclic model, two parallel orbifold planes or M-branes collide periodically in a higher-dimensional space. The visible four-dimensional universe lies on one of these branes. The collisions correspond to a reversal from contraction to expansion, or a Big Crunch followed immediately by a Big Bang. The matter and radiation we see today were generated during the most recent collision in a pattern dictated by quantum fluctuations created before the branes. After billions of years the universe reached the state we observe today; after additional billions of years it will ultimately begin to contract again. Dark energy corresponds to a force between the branes, and serves the crucial role of solving the monopole, horizon, and flatness problems. Moreover, the cycles can continue indefinitely into the past and the future, and the solution is an attractor, so it can provide a complete history of the universe.

As Richard C. Tolman showed, the earlier cyclic model failed because the universe would undergo inevitable thermodynamic heat death. However, the newer cyclic model evades this by having a net expansion each cycle, preventing entropy from building up. However, there remain major open issues in the model. Foremost among them is that colliding branes are not understood by string theorists, and nobody knows if the scale invariant spectrum will be destroyed by the big crunch. Moreover, as with cosmic inflation, while the general character of the forces (in the ekpyrotic scenario, a force between branes) required to create the vacuum fluctuations is known, there is no candidate from particle physics.

The Baum–Frampton model

This more recent cyclic model of 2007 assumes an exotic form of dark energy called phantom energy, which possesses negative kinetic energy and would usually cause the universe to end in a Big Rip. This condition is achieved if the universe is dominated by dark energy with a cosmological equation of state parameter w {\displaystyle w} satisfying the condition w p ρ < 1 {\displaystyle w\equiv {\frac {p}{\rho }}<-1} , for energy density ρ {\displaystyle {\rho }} and pressure p. By contrast, Steinhardt–Turok assume w 1 {\displaystyle w{\geq }-1} . In the Baum–Frampton model, a septillionth (or less) of a second (i.e. 10 seconds or less) before the would-be Big Rip, a turnaround occurs and only one causal patch is retained as our universe. The generic patch contains no quark, lepton or force carrier; only dark energy – and its entropy thereby vanishes. The adiabatic process of contraction of this much smaller universe takes place with constant vanishing entropy and with no matter including no black holes which disintegrated before turnaround.

The idea that the universe "comes back empty" is a central new idea of this cyclic model, and avoids many difficulties confronting matter in a contracting phase such as excessive structure formation, proliferation and expansion of black holes, as well as going through phase transitions such as those of QCD and electroweak symmetry restoration. Any of these would tend strongly to produce an unwanted premature bounce, simply to avoid violation of the second law of thermodynamics. The condition of w < 1 {\displaystyle w<-1} may be logically inevitable in a truly infinitely cyclic cosmology because of the entropy problem. Nevertheless, many technical back up calculations are necessary to confirm consistency of the approach. Although the model borrows ideas from string theory, it is not necessarily committed to strings, or to higher dimensions, yet such speculative devices may provide the most expeditious methods to investigate the internal consistency. The value of w {\displaystyle w} in the Baum–Frampton model can be made arbitrarily close to, but must be less than, −1.

Other cyclic models

  • Conformal cyclic cosmology—a general relativity based theory by Roger Penrose in which the universe expands until all the matter decays and is turned to light—so there is nothing in the universe that has any time or distance scale associated with it. This permits it to become identical with the Big Bang, so starting the next cycle.
  • Loop quantum cosmology which predicts a "quantum bridge" between contracting and expanding cosmological branches.

See also

Physical cosmologies:

Religion:

References

  1. "Friedmann universe | Expanding Universe, Big Bang & Dark Energy | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2023-09-24.
  2. ^ Tolman, R. C. (1987) . Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology. New York: Dover. ISBN 978-0-486-65383-9. LCCN 34032023.
  3. Frampton, P. H. (2006). "On Cyclic Universes". arXiv:astro-ph/0612243.
  4. "Dark energy is driving universe apart: NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer finds dark energy repulsive". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2023-08-22.
  5. Mandelbaum, Rachel; Blake, Chris; Bridle, Sarah; Abdalla, Filipe B.; Brough, Sarah; Colless, Matthew; Couch, Warrick; Croom, Scott; Davis, Tamara; Drinkwater, Michael J.; Forster, Karl; Glazebrook, Karl; Jelliffe, Ben; Jurek, Russell J.; Li, I-hui; Madore, Barry; Martin, Chris; Pimbblet, Kevin; Poole, Gregory B.; Pracy, Michael; Sharp, Rob; Wisnioski, Emily; Woods, David; Wyder, Ted (2011). "The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Direct constraints on blue galaxy intrinsic alignments at intermediate redshifts". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 410 (2): 844–859. arXiv:0911.5347. Bibcode:2011MNRAS.410..844M. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17485.x. S2CID 36510728.
  6. Steinhardt, P. J.; Turok, N. (2002). "Cosmic Evolution in a Cyclic Universe". Physical Review D. 65 (12): 126003. arXiv:hep-th/0111098. Bibcode:2002PhRvD..65l6003S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.126003. S2CID 1342094.
  7. Steinhardt, P. J.; Turok, N. (2001). "A Cyclic Model of the Universe". Science. 296 (5572): 1436–1439. arXiv:hep-th/0111030. Bibcode:2002Sci...296.1436S. doi:10.1126/science.1070462. PMID 11976408. S2CID 1346107.
  8. ^ Baum, Lewis; Frampton, P. H. (2008). "Entropy of Contracting Universe in Cyclic Cosmology". Modern Physics Letters A. 23 (1): 33–36. arXiv:hep-th/0703162. Bibcode:2008MPLA...23...33B. doi:10.1142/S0217732308026170. S2CID 719844.
  9. Steinhardt, P. J.; Turok, N. (2005). "The Cyclic Model Simplified". New Astronomy Reviews. 49 (2–6): 43–57. arXiv:astro-ph/0404480. Bibcode:2005NewAR..49...43S. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2005.01.003. S2CID 16034194.
  10. Woit, Peter (2006). Not Even Wrong. London: Random House. ISBN 978-0-09-948864-4.
  11. Baum, L.; Frampton, P. H. (2007). "Turnaround in Cyclic Cosmology". Physical Review Letters. 98 (7): 071301. arXiv:hep-th/0610213. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98g1301B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.071301. PMID 17359014. S2CID 17698158.

Further reading

External links

Portals: Categories: